Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Fast Convergence in the Double Oral Auction

Published: 22 December 2017 Publication History

Abstract

A classical trading experiment consists of a set of unit demand buyers and unit supply sellers with identical items. Each agent’s value or opportunity cost for the item is his private information, and preferences are quasilinear. Trade between agents employs a double oral auction (DOA) in which both buyers and sellers call out bids or offers that an auctioneer recognizes. Transactions resulting from accepted bids and offers are recorded. This continues until there are no more acceptable bids or offers. Remarkably, the experiment consistently terminates in a Walrasian price. The main result of this article is a mechanism in the spirit of the DOA that converges to a Walrasian equilibrium in a polynomial number of steps, thus providing a theoretical basis for the empirical phenomenon described previously. It is well known that computation of a Walrasian equilibrium for this market corresponds to solving a maximum weight bipartite matching problem. The uncoordinated but mildly rational responses of agents thus solve in a distributed fashion a maximum weight bipartite matching problem that is encoded by their private valuations. We show, furthermore, that every Walrasian equilibrium is reachable by some sequence of responses. This is in contrast to the well-known auction algorithms for this problem that only allow one side to make offers and thus essentially choose an equilibrium that maximizes the surplus for the side making offers. Our results extend to the setting where not every agent pair is allowed to trade with each other.

References

[1]
Mohsen Bayati, Christian Borgs, Jennifer T. Chayes, Yash Kanoria, and Andrea Montanari. 2015. Bargaining dynamics in exchange networks. Journal of Economic Theory 156, 417--454.
[2]
Dimitri P. Bertsekas. 1979. A Distributed Algorithm for the Assignment Problem. Working Paper. Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
[3]
Dimitri P. Bertsekas. 1991. Linear Network Optimization: Algorithms and Codes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[4]
Dimitri P. Bertsekas and David A. Castaon. 1992. A forward/reverse auction algorithm for asymmetric assignment problems. Computational Optimization and Applications 1, 3, 277--297.
[5]
Edward H. Chamberlin. 1948. An experimental imperfect market. Journal of Political Economy 56, 2, 95--108.
[6]
Vincent P. Crawford and Elsie Marie Knoer. 1981. Job matching with heterogeneous firms and workers. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 49, 2, 437--450.
[7]
Gabrielle Demange, David Gale, and Marilda Sotomayor. 1986. Multi-item auctions. Journal of Political Economy 94, 4, 863--872.
[8]
Daniel P. Friedman and John Rust. 1993. The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories, and Evidence. Vol. 14. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
[9]
David Gale and Lloyd S. Shapley. 1962. College admissions and the stability of marriage. American Mathematical Monthly 69, 1, 9--15.
[10]
Yashodhan Kanoria, Mohsen Bayati, Christian Borgs, Jennifer T. Chayes, and Andrea Montanari. 2011. Fast convergence of natural bargaining dynamics in exchange networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’11). 1518--1537.
[11]
Donald E. Knuth. 1976. Mariages Stables et Leurs Relations Avec d8autres Problèmes combinatoires. Presses de l’Université de Montréal. http://books.google.com/books?id=eAmFAAAAIAAJ.
[12]
Harold W. Kuhn. 2010. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. In 50 Years of Integer Programming 1958-2008: From the Early Years to the State-of-the-Art. Springer, 29--47.
[13]
Rajeev Motwani and Prabhakar Raghavan. 2010. Randomized Algorithms. Chapman 8 Hall/CRC.
[14]
Heinrich H. Nax and Bary S. R. Pradelski. 2015. Evolutionary dynamics and equitable core selection in assignment games. International Journal of Game Theory 44, 4, 903--932.
[15]
Heinrich H. Nax, Bary S. R. Pradelski, and H. Peyton Young. 2013. Decentralized dynamics to optimal and stable states in the assignment game. In Proceedings of the 2013 52nd Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC’13). 2391--2397.
[16]
Bary S. R. Pradelski. 2015. Decentralized dynamics and fast convergence in the assignment game: Extended abstract. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC’15). ACM, New York, NY, 43--43.
[17]
Alvin E. Roth and John H. Vande Vate. 1990. Random paths to stability in two-sided matching. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 58, 1475--1480.
[18]
Lloyd S. Shapley and Martin Shubik. 1971. The assignment game I: The core. International Journal of Game Theory 1, 1, 111--130.
[19]
Vernon L. Smith. 1962. An experimental study of competitive market behavior. Journal of Political Economy 70, 2, 111--137.
[20]
Vernon L. Smith. 1991. Papers in Experimental Economics. Cambridge University Press.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation
ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation  Volume 5, Issue 4
Special Issue on Wine'15
November 2017
146 pages
ISSN:2167-8375
EISSN:2167-8383
DOI:10.1145/3174276
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 December 2017
Accepted: 01 April 2017
Revised: 01 December 2016
Received: 01 July 2016
Published in TEAC Volume 5, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tag

  1. Double oral auction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 175
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
Reflects downloads up to 02 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media