Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3171221.3171244acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Futuristic Autobiographies: Weaving Participant Narratives to Elicit Values around Robots

Published: 26 February 2018 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we motivate and introduce Futuristic Autobiographies, a method inspired by design fiction for eliciting values and perspectives on the future of technologies from participants such as users, designers, and researchers. Futuristic autobiographies are the creative work of the researchers and participants. Grounded in empirical and background work, researchers pose several stories involving the participant as a character about a future state with robots. Participants are then asked to weave fictional autobiographies to explain what led to this future state. Via a case study in which futuristic autobiographies were used with 23 roboticists, we detail the process involved in developing and implementing this method. When futuristic autobiographies are employed and carefully crafted from background research, they allow informants to speak for themselves on how their practices and values are intertwined now and in the future. We highlight both the benefits and challenges of futuristic autobiographies as a way to elicit rich stories about values. We argue that futuristic autobiographies are a promising addition to the current qualitative methods toolkit used in HRI.

References

[1]
Shiri Azenkot, Catherine Feng, and Maya Cakmak. 2016. Enabling Building Service Robots to Guide Blind People: A Participatory Design Approach. In TheEleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '16). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 3--10. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id= 2906831.2906835
[2]
Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2015. Humanistic HCI. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 8, 4 (2015), 1--185. {3} Mark Blythe. 2017. Research Fiction: Storytelling, Plot and Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5400--5411.
[3]
Mark Blythe, Kristina Andersen, Rachel Clarke, and Peter Wright. 2016. AntiSolutionist Strategies: Seriously Silly Design Fiction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4968--4978.
[4]
Praminda Caleb-Solly, Sanja Dogramadzi, David Ellender, Tina Fear, and Herjan van den Heuvel. 2014. A Mixed-method Approach to Evoke Creative and Holistic Thinking About Robots in a Home Environment. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 374--381.
[5]
John M Carroll. 2000. Making use: scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. MIT press, Cambridge, MA.
[6]
Kathy Charmaz. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory (2 ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd, London.
[7]
EunJeong Cheon and Norman Makoto Su. 2016. Integrating Roboticist Values into a Design Framework for Humanoid Robots. In The Human-Robot Interaction Pioneers Workshop, held in conjunction with the Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '16). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 603--604. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2906831.2907002
[8]
EunJeong Cheon and Norman Makoto Su. 2016. Integrating Roboticist Values into a Value Sensitive Design Framework for Humanoid Robots. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '16). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 375--382. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2906831. 2906895
[9]
EunJeong Cheon and Norman Makoto Su. 2017. Configuring the User: "Robots Have Needs Too". In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 191--206.
[10]
Nazli Cila, Iskander Smit, Elisa Giaccardi, and Ben Kröse. 2017. Products As Agents: Metaphors for Designing the Products of the IoT Age. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 448--459.
[11]
Scott Clifford, Vijeth Iyengar, Roberto Cabeza, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. 2015. Moral foundations vignettes: A standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory. Behavior research methods 47, 4 (2015), 1178--1198.
[12]
Brian R. Duffy and Karolina Zawieska. 2012. Suspension of disbelief in social robotics. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 484--489.
[13]
Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative everything : design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/ speculative-everything
[14]
Oriel FeldmanHall, Dean Mobbs, Davy Evans, Lucy Hiscox, Lauren Navrady, and Tim Dalgleish. 2012. What we say and what we do: the relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices. Cognition 123, 3 (2012), 434--441.
[15]
Sarah Grace Fields. 2016. Incorporation of Generational Learning in Familiar Interfaces and Systems: A Design Fiction. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 355--361.
[16]
Nick Foster. 2013. The Future Mundane. (2013). www.core77.com/posts/25678/ the-future-mundane-25678
[17]
Batya Friedman. 2004. Value Sensitive Design. In Berkshire encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Berkshire Pub. Group, Great Barrington, MA, 769-- 774.
[18]
Kentaro Go and John M Carroll. 2004. The blind men and the elephant: Views of scenario-based system design. interactions 11, 6 (2004), 44--53.
[19]
Ellie Harmon, Chris Bopp, and Amy Voida. 2017. The Design Fictions of Philanthropic IT: Stuck Between an Imperfect Present and an Impossible Future. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7015--7028.
[20]
Nassim JafariNaimi, Lisa Nathan, and Ian Hargraves. 2015. Values as Hypotheses: Design, Inquiry, and the Service of Values. Design Issues 31, 4 (2015), 91--104.
[21]
Malte F. Jung. 2017. Affective Grounding in Human-Robot Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 263--273.
[22]
Sarah Kriz, Toni D. Ferro, Pallavi Damera, and John R. Porter. 2010. Fictional robots as a data source in HRI research: Exploring the link between science fiction and interactional expectations. In 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 458--463.
[23]
Christopher A. Le Dantec, Erika Shehan Poole, and Susan P. Wyche. 2009. Values As Lived Experience: Evolving Value Sensitive Design in Support of Value Discovery. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1141--1150.
[24]
Hee Rin Lee, Selma Ŝabanović, Wan-Ling Chang, Shinichi Nagata, Jennifer Piatt, Casey Bennett, and David Hakken. 2017. Steps Toward Participatory Design of Social Robots: Mutual Learning with Older Adults with Depression. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 244--253.
[25]
Christina Lichtenthäeler, Annika Peters, Sascha Griffiths, and Alexandra Kirsch. 2013. Be a Robot!: Robot Navigation Patterns in a Path Crossing Scenario. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI '13). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 181--182. http://dl.acm.org/ citation.cfm?id=2447556.2447627
[26]
Joseph Lindley and Paul Coulton. 2016. Pushing the Limits of Design Fiction: The Case For Fictional Research Papers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4032--4043.
[27]
Joseph Lindley and Robert Potts. 2014. A Machine Learning: An Example of HCI Prototyping with Design Fiction. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1081--1084.
[28]
Joseph Lindley and Dhruv Sharma. 2016. Operationalising Design Fiction for Ethical Computing. SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 45, 3 (2016), 79--83.
[29]
Daniel Pargman, Elina Eriksson, Mattias Höjer, Ulrika Gunnarsson Östling, and Luciane Aguiar Borges. 2017. The (Un)Sustainability of Imagined Future Information Societies. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 773--785.
[30]
Sebastian Prost, Elke Mattheiss, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. From Awareness to Empowerment: Using Design Fiction to Explore Paths Towards a Sustainable Energy Future. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1649--1658.
[31]
Paul Robinette, Wenchen Li, Robert Allen, Ayanna M. Howard, and Alan R. Wagner. 2016. Overtrust of Robots in Emergency Evacuation Scenarios. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '16). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 101--108. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm? id=2906831.2906851
[32]
Selma Ŝabanović, Eric Meisner, Linnda R Caporael, Volkan Isler, and Jeff Trinkle. 2009. Outside-in design for interdisciplinary HRI research. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Experimental Design for Real-World Systems. The AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA, 41--48.
[33]
Selma Ŝabanovic, Marek P Michalowski, and Linnda R Caporael. 2007. Making Friends: Building Social Robots through Interdisciplinary Collaboration. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics. The AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA, 71--77.
[34]
Elizabeth B-N Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design 4, 1 (2008), 5--18.
[35]
Eduardo Benitez Sandoval, Omar Mubin, and Mohammad Obaid. 2014. Human robot interaction and fiction: A contradiction. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 54--63.
[36]
Eric Spaulding and Haakon Faste. 2013. Design-driven Narrative: Using Stories to Prototype and Build Immersive Design Worlds. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2843--2852.
[37]
Bruce Sterling. 2013. Bruce Sterling - Fantasy prototypes and real disruption - YouTube. (2013). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7KErICTSHU
[38]
Bruce Sterling. 2013. Patently untrue: fleshy defibrillators and synchronised baseball are changing the future. WIRED UK (2013). http://www.wired.co.uk/ article/patently-untrue
[39]
Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[40]
S. Shyam Sundar, T. Franklin Waddell, and Eun Hwa Jung. 2016. The Hollywood Robot Syndrome: Media Effects on Older Adults? Attitudes Toward Robots and Adoption Intentions. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '16). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 343--350. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2906831.2906890
[41]
Joshua Tanenbaum. 2014. Design Fictional Interactions: Why HCI Should Care About Stories. interactions 21, 5 (2014), 22--23.
[42]
Joshua Tanenbaum, Karen Tanenbaum, and Ron Wakkary. 2012. Steampunk As Design Fiction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factorsin Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1583--1592.
[43]
Daniel H. Wilson. 2015. Chasing Our Science Fiction Future. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 245--245.
[44]
Matthew Wood, Gavin Wood, and Madeline Balaam. 2017. "They'Re Just Tixel Pits, Man": Disputing the 'Reality' of Virtual Reality Pornography Through the Story Completion Method. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5439--5451.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Co-experiential futuring: Where speculative design and arts meet futures studiesFutures10.1016/j.futures.2025.103549166(103549)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2024)From care practices to speculative vignettes–design considerations for robots in good careFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2024.134736711Online publication date: 9-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Drinking Chai with Your (AI) Programming Partner: Value Tensions in the Tokenization of Future Human-AI Collaborative WorkProceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3663384.3663390(1-15)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Futuristic Autobiographies: Weaving Participant Narratives to Elicit Values around Robots

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HRI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
    February 2018
    468 pages
    ISBN:9781450349536
    DOI:10.1145/3171221
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 February 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. design fiction
    2. human-robot interaction
    3. qualitative methods
    4. value sensitive design

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    HRI '18
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    HRI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 49 of 206 submissions, 24%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    HRI '25
    ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
    March 4 - 6, 2025
    Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)94
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Co-experiential futuring: Where speculative design and arts meet futures studiesFutures10.1016/j.futures.2025.103549166(103549)Online publication date: Feb-2025
    • (2024)From care practices to speculative vignettes–design considerations for robots in good careFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2024.134736711Online publication date: 9-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Drinking Chai with Your (AI) Programming Partner: Value Tensions in the Tokenization of Future Human-AI Collaborative WorkProceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3663384.3663390(1-15)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Out of Place Robot in the Wild: Envisioning Urban Robot Contextual Adaptability Challenges Through a Design ProbeExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651002(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Charting the Future of AI in Project-Based Learning: A Co-Design Exploration with StudentsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642807(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Seam Work and Simulacra of Societal Impact in Networking Research: A Critical Technical Practice ApproachProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642337(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Exploring cultural imaginaries of robots with children with brittle bone disease: a participatory design studyMedical Humanities10.1136/medhum-2024-013039(medhum-2024-013039)Online publication date: 19-Dec-2024
    • (2023)Engaging the General Public in Speculation on Human-Building Interaction Futures at a Pop-up Event: A Design Fiction ApproachProceedings of the 26th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3616961.3616966(154-168)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2023
    • (2023)AI Consent Futures: A Case Study on Voice Data Collection with CliniciansProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101077:CSCW2(1-30)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Powerful Futures: How a Big Tech Company Envisions Humans and Technologies in the Workplace of the FutureProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101037:CSCW2(1-35)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media