Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173686acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Phone vs. Tangible in Museums: A Comparative Study

Published: 19 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Despite years of HCI research on digital technology in museums, it is still unclear how different interactions impact on visitors'. A comparative evaluation of smart replicas, phone app and smart cards looked at the personal preferences, behavioural change, and the appeal of mobiles in museums. 76 participants used all three interaction modes and gave their opinions in a questionnaire; participants interaction was also observed. The results show the phone is the most disliked interaction mode while tangible interaction (smart card and replica combined) is the most liked. Preference for the phone favour mobility to the detriment of engagement with the exhibition. Different behaviours when interacting with the phone or the tangibles where observed. The personal visiting style appeared to be only marginally affected by the device. Visitors also expect museums to provide the phones against the current trend of developing apps in a "bring your own device" approach.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (pn1745.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Archeomatica 2016 Museo Glass Beacon: indagine sul gradimento della visita in realtá aumentata ai Mercati di Traiano https://www.archeomatica.it/musei/museoglass-beacon-indagine-gradimento-della-visita-realtaaumentata-mercati-di-traiano (accessed 15.9.2017)
[2]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77--101.
[3]
Carlotta Capurro, Dries Nollet and Daniel Pletinkx 2015. Tangible interfaces for digital museum applications The Virtex and Virtex Light systems in the Keys to Rome exhibition. Proc of Digital Heritage, Granada, IEEE, 271--276.
[4]
Luigina Ciolfi, Gabriela Avram, Laura Maye, Nicholas Dulake, Mark T. Marshall, Dick van Dijk, D. and Fiona McDermott. 2016. Articulating Co-Design in Museums: Reflection on Two Participatory Processes, Proceedings of CSCW 2016, New York: ACM, 13--25.
[5]
Luigina Ciolfi and Marc McLoughlin. 2012. Of Turf Fires, Fine Linen and Porter Cake: Design for Living History, ACM Interactions, XIX.5 September + October, 18--21.
[6]
Deloitte Global Mobile Consumer Survey 2016, NL edition.https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitt e/nl/Documents/technology-mediatelecommunications/deloitte-nl-tmt-global-mobileconsumer-survey-2016.pdf (accessed 14.9.2017)
[7]
Lotte de Reus, Jouke Verlinden, Maaike Roozenburg. 2013 Nonlinear stories told by cups and saucers: Smart Replicas with responsive 3D audio. Ar{t} Magazine, 3, 34--39.
[8]
Maria Economou and E. Meintani. 2011. Promising beginning? Evaluating museum mobile phone apps. Proc. of Rethinking Technology in Museums 2011: Emerging experiences, Limerick, Ireland, 26--27 May 2011.
[9]
John Falk. 2009 Identity and the Museum Visitor Experience, Left Coast Press.
[10]
Kieran Ferris, Liam Bannon, Luigina Ciolfi, Paul Gallagher, Tony Hall, and Marilyn Lennon. 2004. Shaping experiences in the hunt museum: a design case study. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS '04). ACM, 205--214.
[11]
Lesley Fosh, Steve Benford, Stuart Reeves, Boriana Koleva and Patrick Brundell. 2013. 'See Me, Feel Me, Touch Me, Hear Me': Trajectories and Interpretations in a Sculpture Garden. In Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 149--158.
[12]
Gallery One, Cleveland Museum of Art. 2013. Video. (7 March 2013.). Retrieved September 22, 2015 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWJqd6lyJ-E (accessed 15.9.2017)
[13]
Kerry Hannon. 2016 Museums, the New Social Media Darlings. The New York Times, 28 October https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/arts/design/muse ums-the-new-social-media-darlings.html?mcubz=1 (accessed 15.9.2017)
[14]
Adrian Hazzard, Steve Benford and Gary Burnett. 2015 Sculpting a mobile music soundtrack. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), 387--396.
[15]
Uta Hinrichs and Sheelagh Carpendale 2011. Gestures in the Wild: Studying Multi-touch Gesture Sequences on Interactive Tabletop Exhibit. In Proc. of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 3023--3032.
[16]
Eva Hornecker. 2008. I don't understand it either but it's cool" -- Visitor Interactions with a Multi-touch Table in a Museum. In Proceedings of IEEE Tabletop, 121--128.
[17]
Jean Ho Chu, Daniel Harley, Jamie Kwan, Melanie McBride, and Ali Mazalek. 2016. Sensing History: Contextualizing Artifacts with Sensory Interactions and Narrative Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, 1294--1302.
[18]
Andrew Lewis 2013. What do visitors say about using mobile devices in Museums? V&A -- Victoria and Albert Museum http://www.vam.ac.uk/blog/digitalmedia/museum-visitors-using-mobile (accessed 15.9.2017)
[19]
David McGookin, Koray Tahiroălu, Tuomas Vaittinen, Mikko Kytö, Beatrice Monastero, and Juan Carlos Vasquez. 2017. Exploring Seasonality in Mobile Cultural Heritage. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, 6101--6105.
[20]
Mark T. Marshall, Nicholas Dulake, Luigina Ciolfi, Daniele Duranti, Daniela Petrelli. 2016. Using Tangible Smart Replicas as Controls for an Interactive Museum Exhibition. In Proceedings of TEI 2016 -- Tenth Anniversary Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI16), New York: ACM, 159--167
[21]
NMC Horizon Museum Edition 2016 http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2016-nmc-horizon-reportmuseum-EN.pdf (accessed 15.9.2017)
[22]
Daniela Petrelli, Luigina Ciolfi, Dick van Dijk, Eva Hornecker, Elena Not, Albrecht Schmidt. 2013. Integrating material and digital: a new way for cultural heritage. ACM Interactions, 20(4), 58--63.
[23]
Daniela Petrelli, Nicholas Dulake, Mark T. Marshall, Hub Kockelkorn, Anna Pisetti. 2016. Do it together: The effect of curators, designers, and technologists sharing the making of new interactive visitors' experiences. Proc. of Museums and the Web 2016 (MW2016) http://mw2016.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/do-ittogether-the-effect-of-curators-designers-andtechnologists-sharing-the-making-of-new-interactivevisitors-experiences/ (accessed 11.12.2017)
[24]
Daniela Petrelli and Elena Not. 2005. User-centred design of flexible hypermedia for a mobile guide: reflections on the HyperAudio experience. UMUAI User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 15(3--4), 303--338
[25]
Daniela Petrelli, Mark T. Marshall, Sinead O'Brien, Patrick McEntaggart, Ian Gwilt. 2016. Tangible data souvenirs as a bridge between a physical museum visit and online digital experience. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 1--15.
[26]
Daniela Petrelli, Alessandro Soranzo, Luigina Ciolfi and John Reidy. 2016. Exploring the aesthetics of tangible interaction: experiments on the perception of hybrid objects. In Proc. Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction TEI 2016. ACM Press.
[27]
Margaret H. Szymanski, Paul M. Aoki, Rebecca E. Grinter, Amy Hurst, James Thornton, and Alison Woodruff. 2007. Sotto Voce: Facilitating Social Learning in a Historic House. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 17: 5--34.
[28]
Scott Sayre. 2015 Bring it on: Ensuring the success of BYOD programming in the musuem environment. Proc. Of Museums and the Web. http://mw2015.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/bringit-on-ensuring-the-success-of-byod-programming-inthe-museum-environment/ (accessed 15.9.2017)
[29]
Beverly Serrell and Britt Raphling. 1992 Computers on the Exhibit Floor. Curator -- The Museum Journal, 35, 3: 181--189.
[30]
Smithsonian Institution. 2002. The Making of Exhibitions: Purpose, Structure, Role, and Process. http://www.si.edu/content/opanda/docs/rpts2002/02.10. makingexhibitions.final.pdf (accessed 15.9.2017)
[31]
Neal Stimler. 2013 Seeing the Met through Glass. http://www.metmuseum.org/blogs/digitalunderground/posts/2013/seeing-the-met-through-glass (accessed 15.9.2017)
[32]
Robyn Taylor, John Bowers, Bettina Nissen, Gavin Wood, Qasim Chaudhry, Peter Wright, Lindsey Bruce, Sarah Glynn, Helen Mallinson, and Roy Bearpark. 2015. Making Magic: Designing for Open Interactions in Museum Settings. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '15). ACM, 313--322.
[33]
Eliseo Veron and Martine Lavasseur. 1983. Ethnographie de l'exposition, Bibliotheque Public d'Information, Centre George Pompidou, Paris.
[34]
Dirk vom Lehn and Christian Heath. 2003. Displacing the object: mobile technology and interpretive resources. Proc. of Cultural Institution and Digital Technology.http://www.archimuse.com/publishing/ichi m03/088C.pdf
[35]
Philipp Wacker, Kerstin Kreutz, Florian Heller, and Jan Borchers. 2016. Maps and Location: Acceptance of Modern Interaction Techniques for Audio Guides. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, 10671071.
[36]
Ron Wakkary and Marek Hatala. 2007. Situated play in a tangible interface and adaptive audio museum guide. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11, 171--191.
[37]
Ron Wakkary, Marek Hatala, Kevin Muise, Karen Tanenbaum, Greg Corness, Bardia Mohabbati and Jim Budd. 2009. Kurio: A Museum Guide for Families. In Proceedings of Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI'09), ACM, 215--222.
[38]
Alexandra Weilenmann, Thomas Hillman, and Beata Jungselius. 2013. Instagram at the museum: communicating the museum experience through social photo sharing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, 1843--1852.
[39]
Massimo Zancanaro, Tzvika Kuflik, Zvi Boger, Dina Goren-Bar and Dan Goldwasser, Analyzing Museum Visitors' Behaviour Pattern, Proceedings of the User Modeling UM 2007, LNAI 4511 (2207) 238--246.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluating User Experience in the Context of Cultural Heritage Dissemination Using Extended Reality: A Case Study of the Dacian Bronze Matrix with Hollow DesignJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/363993317:2(1-21)Online publication date: 9-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Griot-Style Methodology: Longitudinal Study of Navigating Design With Unwritten StoriesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642682(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Interactive description to enhance accessibility and experience of deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals in museumsUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-023-00983-223:2(913-926)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Phone vs. Tangible in Museums: A Comparative Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2018
    8489 pages
    ISBN:9781450356206
    DOI:10.1145/3173574
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 19 April 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Badges

    • Honorable Mention

    Author Tags

    1. comparison
    2. mobile phone
    3. museum
    4. tangible interaction

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • EU FP7

    Conference

    CHI '18
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 666 of 2,590 submissions, 26%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)59
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Evaluating User Experience in the Context of Cultural Heritage Dissemination Using Extended Reality: A Case Study of the Dacian Bronze Matrix with Hollow DesignJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/363993317:2(1-21)Online publication date: 9-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Griot-Style Methodology: Longitudinal Study of Navigating Design With Unwritten StoriesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642682(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Interactive description to enhance accessibility and experience of deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals in museumsUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-023-00983-223:2(913-926)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Serious Games to Enhance Education. Play, Technology and Archaeology in a Spanish museumRevista Colombiana de Educación10.17227/rce.num89-13992(59-85)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Exploring Digital Means to Engage Visitors with Roman Culture: Virtual Reality vs. Tangible InteractionJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/362536716:4(1-18)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Loci Stories: Exploring Design for Polyvocality Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596114(15-30)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
    • (2023)HeritageSite AR: An Exploration Game for Quality Education and Sustainable Cultural Heritage✱Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3583837(1-8)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Morphing Identity: Exploring Self-Other Identity Continuum through Interpersonal Facial Morphing ExperienceProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580853(1-15)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)CubeMuseum AR: A Tangible Augmented Reality Interface for Cultural Heritage Learning and Museum GiftingInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.217135040:6(1409-1437)Online publication date: 6-Feb-2023
    • (2022)Social Media Analytics as a Tool for Cultural Spaces—The Case of Twitter Trending TopicsBig Data and Cognitive Computing10.3390/bdcc60200636:2(63)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media