research-article

Playing with Streakiness in Online Games: How Players Perceive and React to Winning and Losing Streaks in League of Legends

Authors:

Eli Suzuki-GillAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Paper No.: 578, Pages 1 - 14

https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174152

Published: 21 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Streakiness refers to observed tendency towards consecutive appearances of particular patterns. In video games, streakiness is oftentimes inevitable, where a player keeps winning or losing for a short period. However, the phenomenon remains understudied in present online game research. How do players perceive streakiness? How does it impact player experience (PX)? How should streakiness be taken into consideration for the design of PX? In this paper, we address these questions through a qualitative study of player discussions about streakiness in League of Legends. We found that players developed various ways to describe a streak. Both winning and losing streaks negatively impacted PX. Players devised numerous strategies to manage streakiness, among which disengagement was a primary means. We analyze streakiness as a social construct through which players coped with complex game systems. We discuss design implications for managing streakiness in online games.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (pn4527.mp4)

Download
267.25 MB

References

[1]

Jim Albert. 2004. Streakiness in Team Performance. CHANCE 17, 3: 37--43.

[2]

Jim Albert and Jay Bennett. 2003. Curve ball?: baseball, statistics, and the role of chance in the game. Copernicus Books.

[3]

Ahmer Arif, John J. Robinson, Stephanie A. Stanek, Elodie S. Fichet, Paul Townsend, Zena Worku, and Kate Starbird. 2017. A Closer Look at the Self-Correcting Crowd: Examining Corrections in Online Rumors. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, 155--168.

Digital Library

[4]

Peter Ayton and Ilan Fischer. 2004. The hot hand fallacy and the gambler's fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness? Memory&Cognition 32, 8: 1369--1378.

[5]

Michael Bar-Eli, Simcha Avugos, and Markus Raab. 2006. Twenty years of "hot hand" research: Review and critique. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 7, 6: 525--553.

[6]

Jared L. Bleak and Christina M. Frederick. 1998. Supersititious Behavior in Sport: Levels of Effectiveness and Determinants of Use in Three Collegiate Sports. Journal of Sport Behavior 21, 1.

[7]

Gifford W. Bradley. 1978. Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, 1: 56--71.

[8]

Kurt A. Carlson and Suzanne B. Shu. 2007. The rule of three: How the third event signals the emergence of a streak. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 104, 1: 113--121.

[9]

Trevor I. Case, Julie Fitness, David R. Cairns, and Richard J. Stevenson. 2004. Coping With Uncertainty: Superstitious Strategies and Secondary Control1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34, 4: 848--871.

[10]

Dongseong Choi and Jinwoo Kim. 2004. Why People Continue to Play Online Games: In Search of Critical Design Factors to Increase Customer Loyalty to Online Contents. CyberPsychology&Behavior 7, 1: 11--24.

[11]

Trina Choontanom and Bonnie Nardi. 2012. Theorycrafting: The Art and Science of Using Numbers to Interpret the World. In Games, Learning, and Society: Learning and Meaning in the Digital Age. Cambridge University Press, London, 185--209.

[12]

Colin F. Camerer. 1989. Does the Basketball Market Believe in the 'Hot Hand,'? The American Economic Review 79, 5: 1257--1261.

[13]

Robert A. Connolly and Richard J. Rendleman. 2008. Skill, Luck, and Streaky Play on the PGA Tour. Journal of the American Statistical Association 103, 481: 74--88.

[14]

Clara Crivellaro, Rob Comber, John Bowers, Peter C. Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. A pool of dreams: facebook, politics and the emergence of a social movement. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14, 3573--3582.

Digital Library

[15]

Lee Crust and Mark Nesti. 2006. A Review of Psychological Momentum in Sports: Why qualitative research is needed. The Online Journal of Sport Psychology 8, 1.

[16]

Peter Csapo, Simcha Avugos, Markus Raab, and Michael Bar-Eli. 2015. The effect of perceived streakiness on the shot-taking behaviour of basketball players. European Journal of Sport Science 15, 7: 647--654.

[17]

Lori F. Cummins, Michael R. Nadorff, and Anita E. Kelly. 2009. Winning and positive affect can lead to reckless gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 23, 2: 287--294.

[18]

Thomas Debeauvais, Bonnie Nardi, Diane J. Schiano, Nicolas Ducheneaut, and Nicholas Yee. 2011. If you build it they might stay: retention mechanisms in World of Warcraft. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games - FDG '11, 180--187.

Digital Library

[19]

Ansgar E. Depping and Regan L. Mandryk. 2017. Why is This Happening to Me?: How Player Attribution can Broaden our Understanding of Player Experience. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, 1040--1052.

Digital Library

[20]

Jill P. Dimond, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne Larose, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback!: the role of storytelling online in a social movement organization. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '13, 477--489.

Digital Library

[21]

Scott Donaldson. 2015. Mechanics and Metagame: Exploring Binary Expertise in League of Legends. Games and Culture: 1--19.

[22]

Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, and Alex Kirlik. 2016. First I "like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 2371--2382.

Digital Library

[23]

Motahhare Eslami, Kristen Vaccaro, Karrrie Karahalios, and Kevin Hamilton. 2017. "Be careful; things can be worse than they appear": Understanding Biased Algorithms and Users' Behavior around Them in Rating Platforms. In ICWSM.

[24]

Batya Friedman and Helen Nissenbaum. 1996. Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 14, 3: 330--347.

Digital Library

[25]

Riot Games. 2017. Matchmaking Guide. support.riotgames.com. Retrieved from https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/201752954-Matchmaking-Guide

[26]

Thomas Gilovich, Robert Vallone, and Amos Tversky. 1985. The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology 17, 3: 295--314.

[27]

Brett Green and Jeffrey Zwiebel. 2016. The Hot-Hand Fallacy: Cognitive Mistakes or Equilibrium Adjustments? Evidence from Major League Baseball. In Sports Analytics Conference.

[28]

Mark D. Griffiths and Carolyn Bingham. 2005. A study of superstitious beliefs among bingo players. Journal of Gambling Issues 13.

[29]

Kevin A. Hallgren. 2012. Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology 8, 1: 23--34.

[30]

Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. The three paradigms of HCI. alt.chi.

[31]

Nerilee Hing, Louise Holdsworth, Margaret Tiyce, and Helen Breen. 2014. Stigma and problem gambling: current knowledge and future research directions. International Gambling Studies 14, 1: 64--81.

[32]

Shang H Hsu, Ming C Chuang, and Chien C Chang. 2000. A semantic differential study of designers' and users' product form perception. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 25, 4: 375--391.

[33]

Robin Hunicke. 2005. The case for dynamic difficulty adjustment in games. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology - ACE '05, 429--433.

Digital Library

[34]

Ioanna Iacovides, Anna L. Cox, Patrick McAndrew, James Aczel, and Eileen Scanlon. 2015. Game-Play Breakdowns and Breakthroughs: Exploring the Relationship Between Action, Understanding, and Involvement. Human--Computer Interaction 30, 3--4: 202--231.

Digital Library

[35]

Daniel Johnson, Lennart E. Nacke, and Peta Wyeth. 2015. All about that Base: Differing Player Experiences in Video Game Genres and the Unique Case of MOBA Games. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, 2265--2274.

Digital Library

[36]

Faltin Karlsen. 2011. Theorycrafting: from collective intelligence to intrinsic satisfaction. In DiGRA.

[37]

Brian L. Keeley. 1999. Of Conspiracy Theories. The Journal of Philosophy 96, 3: 109--126.

[38]

Jooyeon Kim, Brian C. Keegan, Sungjoon Park, and Alice Oh. 2016. The Proficiency-Congruency Dilemma: Virtual Team Design and Performance in Multiplayer Online Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 4351--4365.

Digital Library

[39]

Suck Won Kim and Jon E Grant. 2001. Personality dimensions in pathological gambling disorder and obsessive--compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Research 104, 3: 205--212.

[40]

Young Ji Kim, David Engel, Anita Williams Woolley, Jeffrey Yu-Ting Lin, Naomi McArthur, and Thomas W. Malone. 2017. What Makes a Strong Team?: Using Collective Intelligence to Predict Team Performance in League of Legends. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, 2316--2329.

Digital Library

[41]

Yubo Kou and Xinning Gui. 2014. Playing with strangers: understanding temporary teams in League of Legends. In Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play - CHI PLAY '14, 161--169.

Digital Library

[42]

Yubo Kou, Xinning Gui, and Yong Ming Kow. 2016. Ranking Practices and Distinction in League of Legends. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play - CHI PLAY '16, 4--9.

Digital Library

[43]

Yubo Kou and Bonnie Nardi. 2013. Regulating Anti-Social Behavior on the Internet: The Example of League of Legends. In iConference 2013 Proceedings, 616--622.

[44]

Klaus Krippendorff. 1980. Content analysis?: an introduction to its methodology. SAGE Publications.

[45]

Juhi Kulshrestha, Motahhare Eslami, Johnnatan Messias, Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Saptarshi Ghosh, Krishna P. Gummadi, and Karrie Karahalios. 2017. Quantifying Search Bias: Investigating Sources of Bias for Political Searches in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, 417--432.

Digital Library

[46]

Alex Leavitt, Brian C. Keegan, and Joshua Clark. 2016. Ping to Win?: Non-Verbal Communication and Team Performance in Competitive Online Multiplayer Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 4337--4350.

Digital Library

[47]

Jeroen S. Lemmens, Patti M. Valkenburg, and Jochen Peter. 2011. Psychosocial causes and consequences of pathological gaming. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 1: 144--152.

Digital Library

[48]

Elisa D. Mekler, Julia Ayumi Bopp, Alexandre N. Tuch, Klaus Opwis, Elisa D. Mekler, Julia Ayumi Bopp, Alexandre N. Tuch, and Klaus Opwis. 2014. A systematic review of quantitative studies on the enjoyment of digital entertainment games. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14, 927--936.

Digital Library

[49]

Megan A. Moreno, Natalie Goniu, Peter S. Moreno, and Douglas Diekema. 2013. Ethics of Social Media Research: Common Concerns and Practical Considerations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16, 9: 708--713.

[50]

Lennart Nacke and Anders Drachen. 2011. Towards a Framework of Player Experience Research. In EPEX'2011.

[51]

Bonnie Nardi and Justin Harris. 2006. Strangers and friends: collaborative play in world of warcraft. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '06, 149.

Digital Library

[52]

Christopher Paul. 2011. Optimizing Play: How Theorycraft Changes Gameplay and Design. Game Studies 11, 2.

[53]

Serge Petralito, Florian Brühlmann, Glena Iten, Elisa D. Mekler, and Klaus Opwis. 2017. A Good Reason to Die: How Avatar Death and High Challenges Enable Positive Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, 5087--5097.

Digital Library

[54]

Matt Porter. 2016. League of Legends Surpasses 100 Million Monthly Active Players. ign.com. Retrieved from http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/09/14/league-of-legends-surpasses-100-million-monthly-active-players

[55]

Andrew K. Przybylski, C. Scott Rigby, and Richard M. Ryan. 2010. A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology 14, 2: 154--166.

[56]

Matthew J. Rockloff and Grant Schofield. 2004. Factor Analysis of Barriers to Treatment for Problem Gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies 20, 2: 121--126.

[57]

Paul Rogers. 1998. The Cognitive Psychology of Lottery Gambling: A Theoretical Review. Journal of Gambling Studies 14, 2: 111--134.

[58]

Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55, 1: 68--78.

[59]

Phillip Shaver, Judith Schwartz, Donald Kirson, and Cary O'Connor. 1987. Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 6: 1061--1086.

[60]

Kenneth B. Shores, Yilin He, Kristina L. Swanenburg, Robert Kraut, and John Riedl. 2014. The identification of deviance and its impact on retention in a multiplayer game. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work&social computing - CSCW '14, 1356--1365.

Digital Library

[61]

C. Sire and S. Redner. 2008. Undestanding Baseball Team Standings and Streaks. The European Physical Journal B 67: 473--481.

[62]

Kate Starbird, Emma Spiro, Isabelle Edwards, Kaitlyn Zhou, Jim Maddock, and Sindhuja Narasimhan. 2016. Could This Be True?: I Think So! Expressed Uncertainty in Online Rumoring. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 360--371.

Digital Library

[63]

Avrum Stroll. 1994. Moore and Wittgenstein on Certainty. Oxford University Press.

[64]

April Tyack, Peta Wyeth, and Daniel Johnson. 2016. The Appeal of MOBA Games: What Makes People Start, Stay, and Stop. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play - CHI PLAY '16, 313--325.

Digital Library

[65]

Kellie Vella, Daniel Johnson, Vanessa Wan Sze Cheng, Tracey Davenport, Jo Mitchell, Madison Klarkowski, and Cody Phillips. 2017. A Sense of Belonging: Pokémon GO and Social Connectedness.

[66]

Karl E. Weick. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications.

[67]

Alison Jing Xu, Rami Zwick, and Norbert Schwarz. 2012. Washing away your (good or bad) luck: Physical cleansing affects risk-taking behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141, 1: 26--30.

[68]

Juemin Xu and Nigel Harvey. 2014. Carry on winning: The gamblers' fallacy creates hot hand effects in online gambling. Cognition 131, 2: 173--180.

[69]

Yan Xu, Xiang Cao, Abigail Sellen, Ralf Herbrich, and Thore Graepel. 2011. Sociable killers: Understanding Social Relationships in an Online First-person Shooter Game. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '11, 197.

Digital Library

[70]

Shumaila Yousafzai, Zaheer Hussain, and Mark Griffiths. 2014. Social responsibility in online videogaming: What should the videogame industry do? Addiction Research&Theory 22, 3: 181--185.

Cited By

Zhang ZKou Y(2024)Casual Competition by Design: A Study of the All Random All Mid (ARAM) Mode in League of LegendsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869928:CSCW2(1-28)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686992
Tyack AMekler E(2024)Self-Determination Theory and HCI Games Research: Unfulfilled Promises and Unquestioned ParadigmsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/367323031:3(1-74)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3673230
Deng DTrepanowski RLi MZhang YBujić MHamari J(2024)Streaks and Coping: Decoding Player Performance in League of Legends Using Big Data from Top Players' MatchesCompanion Proceedings of the 2024 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play10.1145/3665463.3678787(50-55)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3665463.3678787
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Playing with Streakiness in Online Games: How Players Perceive and React to Winning and Losing Streaks in League of Legends
1. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

Playing with strangers: understanding temporary teams in league of legends
CHI PLAY '14: Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play

Game researchers have extensively studied how players form long-term social organizations such as guilds and clans to accomplish complex tasks such as raiding in online games. Few studies have paid attention to how temporary teams (or pickup groups) ...
Using Machine Learning to Predict Game Outcomes Based on Player-Champion Experience in League of Legends
FDG '21: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games

League of Legends (LoL) is the most widely played multiplayer online battle arena (MOBA) game in the world. An important aspect of LoL is competitive ranked play, which utilizes a skill-based matchmaking system to form fair teams. However, players’ ...
Streaks and Coping: Decoding Player Performance in League of Legends Using Big Data from Top Players' Matches
CHI PLAY Companion '24: Companion Proceedings of the 2024 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play

Among athletes and sports fans, it is common to believe that one victory leads to another. Such an effect is known as the hot-hand effect or, simply, a winning streak. This effect was most often associated with traditional sports, however, people ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2018

8489 pages

ISBN:9781450356206

DOI:10.1145/3173574

General Chairs:
Regan Mandryk
University of Saskatchewan, Canada
,
Mark Hancock
University of Waterloo, Canada
,
Program Chairs:
Mark Perry
Brunel University London, UK
,
Anna Cox
University College London, UK

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 April 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CHI '18

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '18: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 21 - 26, 2018

Montreal QC, Canada

Acceptance Rates

CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 666 of 2,590 submissions, 26%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

19
Total Citations
View Citations
955
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)125
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26

Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Zhang ZKou Y(2024)Casual Competition by Design: A Study of the All Random All Mid (ARAM) Mode in League of LegendsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869928:CSCW2(1-28)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686992
Tyack AMekler E(2024)Self-Determination Theory and HCI Games Research: Unfulfilled Promises and Unquestioned ParadigmsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/367323031:3(1-74)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3673230
Deng DTrepanowski RLi MZhang YBujić MHamari J(2024)Streaks and Coping: Decoding Player Performance in League of Legends Using Big Data from Top Players' MatchesCompanion Proceedings of the 2024 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play10.1145/3665463.3678787(50-55)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3665463.3678787
Kou YMoradzadeh SGui X(2024)Trading as Gambling: Social Investing and Financial Risks on the r/WallStreetBets SubredditProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642768(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642768
Chen QBellucci AJacucci G(2024)“I’d rather drink in VRChat”: Understanding Drinking in Social Virtual RealityProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642405(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642405
Kang HSuh CKim H(2024)Match experiences affect interest: Impacts of matchmaking and performance on churn in a competitive gameHeliyon10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24891(e24891)Online publication date: Jan-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24891
Shan DXu JLiu TZhang YDai ZZheng YLiu CWei YDai Z(2023)Subjective attitudes moderate the social connectedness in esports gaming during COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional studyFrontiers in Public Health10.3389/fpubh.2022.102011410Online publication date: 4-Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1020114
Beres NKlarkowski MMandryk R(2023)Playing with Emotions: A Systematic Review Examining Emotions and Emotion Regulation in Esports PerformanceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36110417:CHI PLAY(558-587)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3611041
Aeschbach LKayser DBerbert De Castro Hüsler AOpwis KBrühlmann F(2023)The psychology of esports players’ ELO HellComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.107828147:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107828
Aguerri JSantisteban MMiró-Llinares F(2023)The Enemy Hates Best? Toxicity in League of Legends and Its Content Moderation ImplicationsEuropean Journal on Criminal Policy and Research10.1007/s10610-023-09541-129:3(437-456)Online publication date: 24-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-023-09541-1
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents