Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3219104.3229256acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespearcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract
Public Access

Automated synchronization and boundary condition application for the Cactus Framework

Published: 22 July 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The Einstein Toolkit (ETK) is an open-source software platform for computational simulations in relativistic astrophysics and gravitational physics. The Cactus Framework (Cactus) comprises the core component of the ETK and handles creation of distributed data structures, parallelism, I/O, checkpointing, etc. The current Cactus scheduling system relies on the manual synchronization of ghost zones for grid functions (i.e. distributed matrices). Unfortunately, deciding which subroutines should synchronize which grid functions is a non-trivial problem. Incorrect synchronization can result in over synchronization (a performance problem) or under synchronization (an error). This issue also creates a barrier for new users and collaborators. We are developing a new scheduling and synchronization method for Cactus to improve the accessibility and efficiency of the ETK. Synchronization and application of boundary conditions are now handled automatically by Cactus. The new approach requires each subroutine to have "read" and "write" declarations for individual grid functions. Before scheduled functions run, Cactus checks these declarations and performs any synchronization or boundary conditions as needed. This method removes the difficulty of deciding where synchronization should take place and removes unneeded synchronizations. The only knowledge required to provide these declarations is what grid functions a given subroutine uses and on which parts of the grid they are read or written. This new system is a first step in improving Cactus' scheduling methods to use more advanced and scalable techniques.

References

[1]
Tom Goodale, Gabrielle Allen, Gerd Lanfermann, Joan Massó, Thomas Radke, Edward Seidel, and John Shalf. J.M.L.M. Palma, A.A. Sousa, J. Dongarra, V. Hernéndez (Eds.). 2003. The Cactus Framework and Toolkit: Design and Applications. In High Performance Computing for Computational Science --- VECPAR 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2565, 197--227. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
[2]
Frank Löffler, Joshua Faber, Eloisa Bentivegna, Tanja Bode, Peter Diener, Roland Haas, Ian Hinder, Bruno C. Mundim, Christian D. Ott, Erik Schnetter, Gabrielle Allen, Manuela Campanelli, and Pablo Laguna. 2012. The Einstein Toolkit: A Community Computational Infrastructure for Relativistic Astrophysics. Classical and Quantum Gravity 29(11).

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
PEARC '18: Proceedings of the Practice and Experience on Advanced Research Computing: Seamless Creativity
July 2018
652 pages
ISBN:9781450364461
DOI:10.1145/3219104
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 July 2018

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ACM proceedings
  2. Cactus Framework
  3. Einstein Toolkit
  4. Frameworks
  5. Ghost Zones
  6. Synchronization

Qualifiers

  • Extended-abstract
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

PEARC '18

Acceptance Rates

PEARC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 79 of 123 submissions, 64%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 133 of 202 submissions, 66%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 141
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)49
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media