Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Effects of Tactile Textures on Preference in Visuo-Tactile Exploration

Published: 21 May 2021 Publication History

Abstract

The use of haptic technologies has recently become immensely essential in Human-Computer Interaction to improve user experience and performance. With the introduction of tactile feedback on a touchscreen device, commonly known as surface haptics, several applications and interaction paradigms have become a reality. However, the effects of tactile feedback on the preference of 2D images in visuo-tactile exploration task on touchscreen devices remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated differences of preference score (the tendency of participants to like/dislike a 2D image based on its visual and tactile properties), reach time, interaction time, and response time under four conditions of feedback: no tactile feedback, high-quality of tactile information (sharp tactile texture), low-quality of tactile information (blurred tactile texture), and incorrect tactile information (mismatch tactile texture). The tactile feedback is rendered in the form of roughness that is simulated by modulating the friction between the finger and the surface and is derived from the 2D image. Thirty-six participants completed visuo-tactile exploration tasks for a total of 36 trials (3 2D images × 4 tactile textures × 3 repetitions). Results showed that the presence of tactile feedback enhanced users’ preference (tactile feedback conditions were rated significantly higher than the no tactile feedback condition for preference regardless of the quality/correctness of tactile feedback). This finding is also supported through results from self-reporting where 88.89% of participants preferred to experience the 2D image with tactile feedback. Additionally, the presence of tactile feedback resulted in significantly larger interaction time and response time compared to the no tactile feedback condition. Furthermore, the quality and correctness of tactile information significantly impacted the preference rating (sharp tactile textures were rated statistically higher than blurred tactile and mismatched tactile textures). All of these findings demonstrate that tactile feedback plays a crucial role in users’ preference and thus motivates further the development of surface haptic technologies.

References

[1]
Abdenaceur Abdouni, Gilles Moreau, Roberto Vargiolu, and Hassan Zahouani. 2018. Static and active tactile perception and touch anisotropy: Aging and gender effect. Scientific Reports 8, 1 (2018), 14240.
[2]
Bruce Banter. 2010. Touch screens and touch surfaces are enriched by haptic force-feedback. Information Display 26, 3 (2010), 26–30.
[3]
Cagatay Basdogan, Frédéric Giraud, Vincent Levesque, and Seungmoon Choi. 2020. A review of surface haptics: Enabling tactile effects on touch surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 13, 3 (2020), 450–470.
[4]
Olivier Bau, Ivan Poupyrev, Ali Israr, and Chris Harrison. 2010. TeslaTouch: Electrovibration for touch surfaces. In Proceedings of the 23nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 283–292.
[5]
Séréna Bochereau, Stephen Sinclair, and Vincent Hayward. 2018. Perceptual constancy in the reproduction of virtual tactile textures with surface displays. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 15, 2 (2018), 10.
[6]
Stephen Brewster, Faraz Chohan, and Lorna Brown. 2007. Tactile feedback for mobile interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 159–162.
[7]
William Buxton, Ralph Hill, and Peter Rowley. 1985. Issues and techniques in touch-sensitive tablet input. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. 215–224.
[8]
Xiaojuan Chen, Fei Shao, C. J. Barnes, Tom Childs, and Brian Henson. 2009. Exploring relationships between touch perception and surface physical properties. International Journal of Design 3, 2 (2009), 67–76.
[9]
Erik C. Chubb, J. Edward Colgate, and Michael A. Peshkin. 2010. Shiverpad: A glass haptic surface that produces shear force on a bare finger. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 3, 3 (2010), 189–198.
[10]
Frédéric Giraud, Tomohiro Hara, Christophe Giraud-Audine, Michel Amberg, Betty Lemaire-Semail, and Masaya Takasaki. 2018. Evaluation of a friction reduction based haptic surface at high frequency. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS’18). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 210–215.
[11]
Abdelwahab Hamam, Mohamad Eid, and Abdulmotaleb El Saddik. 2013. Effect of kinesthetic and tactile haptic feedback on the quality of experience of edutainment applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications 67, 2 (2013), 455–472.
[12]
Mikel L. Hartman and Harve E. Rawson. 1992. Differences in and correlates of sensation seeking in male and female athletes and nonathletes. Personality and Individual Differences 13, 7 (1992), 805–812.
[13]
David Hecht and Miriam Reiner. 2009. Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli. Experimental Brain Research 193, 2 (2009), 307–314.
[14]
Rachel S. Herz and Elizabeth D. Cahill. 1997. Differential use of sensory information in sexual behavior as a function of gender. Human Nature 8, 3 (1997), 275–286.
[15]
Eve Hoggan, Stephen A. Brewster, and Jody Johnston. 2008. Investigating the effectiveness of tactile feedback for mobile touchscreens. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1573–1582.
[16]
Jeonggoo Kang, Heewon Kim, Seungmoon Choi, Ki-Duk Kim, and Jeha Ryu. 2016. Investigation on low voltage operation of electrovibration display. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 10, 3 (2016), 371–381.
[17]
Dong-Ryul Kim, Ki-Hwan Jang, Won-Shik Chu, Dahyun Choi, Woo Il Lee, Caroline Sunyong Lee, and Sung-Hoon Ahn. 2019. Preference for case materials in smart devices: A comparative study in Korea, USA, and Tanzania. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 20, 5 (2019), 749–767.
[18]
Anne Klöcker, Calogero Maria Oddo, Domenico Camboni, Massimo Penta, and Jean-Louis Thonnard. 2014. Physical factors influencing pleasant touch during passive fingertip stimulation. PLoS ONE 9, 7 (2014), e101361.
[19]
Anne Klöcker, Michael Wiertlewski, Vincent Théate, Vincent Hayward, and Jean-Louis Thonnard. 2013. Physical factors influencing pleasant touch during tactile exploration. PLoS ONE 8, 11 (2013), e79085.
[20]
Martin Krzywinski and Naomi Altman. 2014. Visualizing samples with box plots. Nature Methods 11 (2014), 119–120.
[21]
Joseph Luk, Jerome Pasquero, Shannon Little, Karon MacLean, Vincent Levesque, and Vincent Hayward. 2006. A role for haptics in mobile interaction: Initial design using a handheld tactile display prototype. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 171–180.
[22]
Emanuela Maggioni, Erika Agostinelli, and Marianna Obrist. 2017. Measuring the added value of haptic feedback. In Proceedings of the 2017 9th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX’17). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1–6.
[23]
Francis McGlone, Johan Wessberg, and Håkan Olausson. 2014. Discriminative and affective touch: Sensing and feeling. Neuron 82, 4 (2014), 737–755.
[24]
David J. Meyer, Michael A. Peshkin, and J. Edward Colgate. 2013. Fingertip friction modulation due to electrostatic attraction. In Proceedings of the 2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC’13). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 43–48.
[25]
David J. Meyer, Michaël Wiertlewski, Michael A. Peshkin, and J. Edward Colgate. 2014. Dynamics of ultrasonic and electrostatic friction modulation for rendering texture on haptic surfaces. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS’14). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 63–67.
[26]
Joe Mullenbach, Craig Shultz, A. Marie Piper, Michael Peshkin, and J. Edward Colgate. 2013. TPad Fire: Surface haptic tablet. In Proceedings of the Conference on Haptic and Audio Interaction Design (HAID’13).
[27]
Richard L. Oliver and Gerald Linda. 1981. Effect of satisfaction and its antecedents on consumer preference and intention. In NA—Advances in Consumer Research Volume 08, K. B. Monroe (Ed.). Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI, 88–93.
[28]
Robert E. Oum, Debra Lieberman, and Alison Aylward. 2011. A feel for disgust: Tactile cues to pathogen presence. Cognition and Emotion 25, 4 (2011), 717–725.
[29]
Wanjoo Park, Da-Hye Kim, Sung-Phil Kim, Jong-Hwan Lee, and Laehyun Kim. 2018. Gamma EEG correlates of haptic preferences for a dial interface. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 22324–22331.
[30]
Craig D. Shultz, Michael A. Peshkin, and J. Edward Colgate. 2015. Surface haptics via electroadhesion: Expanding electrovibration with Johnsen and Rahbek. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC’15). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 57–62.
[31]
Siegfried L. Sporer. 1993. Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineups.Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 1 (1993), 22.
[32]
Eckehard Steinbach, Matti Strese, Mohamad Eid, Xun Liu, Amit Bhardwaj, Qian Liu, Mohammad Al-Ja’afreh, et al. 2018. Haptic codecs for the Tactile Internet. Proceedings of the IEEE 107, 2 (2018), 447–470.
[33]
Hideyuki Tamura, Shunji Mori, and Takashi Yamawaki. 1978. Textural features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 8, 6 (1978), 460–473.
[34]
Martin Wollschlaeger, Thilo Sauter, and Juergen Jasperneite. 2017. The future of industrial communication: Automation networks in the era of the Internet of Things and Industry 4.0. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine 11, 1 (2017), 17–27.
[35]
Takumi Yokosaka, Scinob Kuroki, Junji Watanabe, and Shin’ya Nishida. 2017. Estimating tactile perception by observing explorative hand motion of others. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 11, 2 (2017), 192–203.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluation of Haptic Textures for Tangible Interfaces for the Tactile InternetElectronics10.3390/electronics1318377513:18(3775)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Two-finger Stiffness Discrimination with the Stochastic Resonance EffectACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/363025421:2(1-17)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Effects of Tactile Interruption on Hand-Eye Coordination Task Performance2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00024(104-111)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Effects of Tactile Textures on Preference in Visuo-Tactile Exploration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
    ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 18, Issue 2
    April 2021
    78 pages
    ISSN:1544-3558
    EISSN:1544-3965
    DOI:10.1145/3465476
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 May 2021
    Accepted: 01 January 2021
    Revised: 01 January 2021
    Received: 01 January 2020
    Published in TAP Volume 18, Issue 2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Haptic texture
    2. affective computing
    3. tactile perception

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    • Office of Naval Research

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)187
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Evaluation of Haptic Textures for Tangible Interfaces for the Tactile InternetElectronics10.3390/electronics1318377513:18(3775)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Two-finger Stiffness Discrimination with the Stochastic Resonance EffectACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/363025421:2(1-17)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Effects of Tactile Interruption on Hand-Eye Coordination Task Performance2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00024(104-111)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
    • (2023)Adaptive visual–tactile fusion recognition for robotic operation of multi-material systemFrontiers in Neurorobotics10.3389/fnbot.2023.118138317Online publication date: 20-Jun-2023
    • (2022)Usability Tests for Texture Comparison in an Electroadhesion-Based Haptic DeviceMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti61201086:12(108)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Combined virtual bumps and textures on electrostatic friction tactile displays2022 IEEE 11th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE)10.1109/GCCE56475.2022.10014107(315-317)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2022

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media