Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3473682.3480279acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

FlowMotion: Exploring the Intuitiveness of Fluid Motion Based Communication in eHMI Design for Vehicle-Pedestrian Communication

Published: 22 September 2021 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    External Human-Machine interfaces (eHMIs) are typically proposed to facilitate explicit communication of vehicle intent to pedestrians. However, implicit communication through vehicle kinematics or movement patterns is shown to be the primary indicator of driving behavior and intention in traffic, for both manually-driven and automated vehicles. Unfortunately, subtle changes in kinematics are often hard to perceive and make it difficult to comprehend a vehicle’s consequent intention. We created a novel eHMI concept by using fluid movements to highlight and exaggerate the movement of the vehicle, and therefore emphasize this movement-based implicit communication. Preliminary results showed that the movement of the fluid called attention to subtle changes in the acceleration and deceleration of the vehicle, and was able to effectively indicate the nature of the change of vehicle speed, which in turn alluded to its intentions in traffic. This approach explores design solutions to highlight vehicle kinematics in facilitating communication of vehicle intention in traffic, for both automated vehicles of the future, and manually-driven vehicles of today.

    References

    [1]
    Koen de Clercq, Andre Dietrich, Juan Pablo Núñez Velasco, Joost de Winter, and Riender Happee. 2019. External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions. Human Factors (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819836343
    [2]
    Debargha Dey, Azra Habibovic, Andreas Löcken, Philipp Wintersberger, Bastian Pfleging, Andreas Riener, Marieke Martens, and Jacques Terken. 2020. Taming the eHMI jungle: A classification taxonomy to guide, compare, and assess the design principles of automated vehicles’ external human-machine interfaces. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100174
    [3]
    Debargha Dey, Azra Habibovic, Bastian Pfleging, Marieke Martens, and Jacques Terken. 2020. Color and Animation Preferences for a Light Band EHMI in Interactions Between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376325
    [4]
    Debargha Dey, Andrii Matviienko, Melanie Berger, Bastian Pfleging, Marieke Martens, and Jacques Terken. 2020. Communicating the Intention of an Automated Vehicle to Pedestrians: the Contributions of eHMI and Vehicle Behavior. Information Technology Submitted, Special Issue: Automotive User Interfaces in the Age of Automation (2020). https://doi.org/10.1515/ITIT-2020-0025
    [5]
    Debargha Dey and Jacques Terken. 2017. Pedestrian Interaction with Vehicles: Roles of Explicit and Implicit Communication. In AutomotiveUI ’17 ACM 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. Oldenburg. https://doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3123009
    [6]
    Debargha Dey, Francesco Walker, Marieke Martens, and Jacques Terken. 2019. Gaze patterns in pedestrian interaction with vehicles: Towards effective design of external human-machine interfaces for automated vehicles. In Proceedings - 11th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2019. 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344523
    [7]
    Y. B. Eisma, S. van Bergen, S. M. ter Brake, M. T.T. Hensen, W. J. Tempelaar, and J. C.F. de Winter. 2020. External human-machine interfaces: The effect of display location on crossing intentions and eye movements. Information (Switzerland) 11, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/info11010013
    [8]
    Stefanie M. Faas, Lesley Ann Mathis, and Martin Baumann. 2020. External HMI for self-driving vehicles: Which information shall be displayed?Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 68 (jan 2020), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.009
    [9]
    Eugene Hecht. 2002. Optics (4th ed.ed.). Addison-Wesley, Reading Mass.
    [10]
    Christopher R. Hudson, Shuchisnigdha Deb, Daniel W. Carruth, John McGinley, and Darren Frey. 2019. Pedestrian Perception of Autonomous Vehicles with External Interacting Features. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 781 (2019), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94334-3_5
    [11]
    Dylan Moore, Rebecca Currano, G. Ella Strack, and David Sirkin. 2019. The case for implicit external human-machine interfaces for autonomous vehicles. Proceedings - 11th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2019 (2019), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3345320
    [12]
    J. Farley Norman, Heather E. Ross, Laura M. Hawkes, and Jennifer R. Long. 2003. Aging and the perception of speed. Perception 32, 1 (2003), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3478
    [13]
    Michael Pernkopf and Helmut Tiesler-wittig. 2018. Lighting for automated vehicles – Discussion on ways forward. Technical Report April. 24–27pages. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU74wK_RlTohttps://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2018/wp29gre/GRE-79-35e.PDF
    [14]
    Andreas Riener, Myounhoon Jeon, and Ignacio Alvarez. 2021. User Experience Design in the Era of Automated Driving. Vol. 980. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77726-5
    [15]
    Malte Risto, Colleen Emmenegger, Erik Vinkhuyzen, Melissa Cefkin, and Jim Hollan. 2017. Human-Vehicle Interfaces: The Power of Vehicle Movement Gestures in Human Road User Coordination. (2017), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1633
    [16]
    Jiaming Shi, Changxu Wu, and Xiuying Qian. 2020. The effects of multiple factors on elderly pedestrians’ speed perception and stopping distance estimation of approaching vehicles. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12, 13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135308
    [17]
    Helmut Tiesler-Wittig. 2019. Functional Application, Regulatory Requirements and Their Future Opportunities for Lighting of Automated Driving Systems. Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0848
    [18]
    Erik Vinkhuyzen and Melissa Cefkin. 2016. Developing Socially Acceptable Autonomous Vehicles. Proceedings of the Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference (EPIC) (2016), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/1559-8918.2016.01108
    [19]
    Annette Werner. 2018. New Colours for Autonomous Driving: An Evaluation of Chromaticities for the External Lighting Equipment of Autonomous Vehicles. ColourTurn 10, 3 (2018), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.25538/tct.v0i1.692

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Towards Safe Encounters between Pedestrians and Autonomous Driverless Vehicles: Comparing Adults and Children's Perceptions of External Human Machine Interface Design FeaturesProceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3594806.3594827(165-170)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2023

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AutomotiveUI '21 Adjunct: 13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
    September 2021
    234 pages
    ISBN:9781450386418
    DOI:10.1145/3473682
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 September 2021

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Keywords: eHMI
    2. VRU
    3. automated vehicles
    4. car-pedestrian interaction
    5. communication
    6. fluid motion
    7. vehicle kinematics

    Qualifiers

    • Work in progress
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    AutomotiveUI '21
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

    Upcoming Conference

    AutomotiveUI '24

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Towards Safe Encounters between Pedestrians and Autonomous Driverless Vehicles: Comparing Adults and Children's Perceptions of External Human Machine Interface Design FeaturesProceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3594806.3594827(165-170)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2023

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media