Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3478431.3499295acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What is a Computer Scientist?: Unpacking the Ontological Beliefs of Black and Hispanic Female Computing Students

Published: 22 February 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic women in computer science is a long-standing problem that looks bleak at every level - undergraduate and graduate. This is prompting scholars to explore reasons for these low participation rates. One framework used to understand participation and persistence in STEM fields is identity. Prior work in computer science education suggest that identity is a strong indicator of persistence in these fields. However, it is hard to understand students' perception of identity without also understanding ontological beliefs with regards to a computer scientist. In this study, we explore the nature of a computer scientist. Guided by social identity theory, we designed a study that asked students to describe their definition or ontological belief of what constitutes a computer scientist in contrast to their ability to ascribe a computer science identity to self. Leveraging qualitative methods, we interviewedn = 24 women in computer science (Black and Hispanic, undergraduate and graduate students), in order to explore the role their ontological beliefs had on their computer science identity salience. The research questions guiding this work are: (1) How do Black and Hispanic women describe or define computer scientists? (2) What impact does this definition have on Black and Hispanic women's ability to claim a computing identity? Results suggest that the wide variation in definitions has a negative impact on computer science identity salience. The findings from this work suggest that computing should consider the impacts of the current messaging of what constitutes a computer scientist.

References

[1]
Anita P. Chikkatur and Cheryl Jones-Walker. 2013. The influence of researcher identity on ethnographies in multiracial schools. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26, 7 (2013), 829--847.
[2]
John W Creswell and Cheryl N Poth. 2016. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
[3]
Barbara J Daley. 2004. Using concept maps in qualitative research. (2004).
[4]
Jennifer Dempsey, Richard Snodgrass, Isabel Kishi, and Allison Titcomb. 2015. The emerging role of self-perception in student intentions. (2015), 108--113. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677305
[5]
Lorelle Espinosa. 2011. Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review 81, 2 (2011), 209--241.
[6]
George Foster, Simona Gandrabur, Philippe Langlais, Pierre Plamondon, Graham Russell, and Michel Simard. 2003. Statistical Machine Translation: Rapid Development with Limited Resources. In Proceedings of MT Summit IX. New Orleans, USA, 110--119.
[7]
Juan C. Garibay. 2015. STEM students' social agency and views on working for social change: Are STEM disciplines developing socially and civically responsible students? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52, 5 (2015), 610--632. https: //doi.org/10.1002/tea.21203
[8]
Francisco J Gutierrez, Jocelyn Simmonds, Cecilia Casanova, Cecilia Sotomayor, and Nancy Hitschfeld. 2018. Coding or hacking? Exploring inaccurate views on computing and computer scientists among K-6 learners in Chile. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 993--998.
[9]
Alexandria K Hansen, Hilary A Dwyer, Ashley Iveland, Mia Talesfore, Lacy Wright, Danielle B Harlow, and Diana Franklin. 2017. Assessing children's understanding of the work of computer scientists: The draw-a-computer-scientist test. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education. 279--284.
[10]
Trudy Howles. 2009. A study of attrition and the use of student learning communities in the computer science introductory programming sequence. Computer science education 19, 1 (2009), 1--13.
[11]
Paivi Kinnunen, Matthew Butler, Michael Morgan, Aletta Nylen, Anne-Kathrin Peters, Jane Sinclair, Sara Kalvala, and Erkki Pesonen. 2018. Understanding initial undergraduate expectations and identity in computing studies. European Journal of Engineering Education 43, 2 (2018), 201--218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797. 2016.1146233
[12]
Jonathan Mahadeo, Zahra Hazari, and Geoff Potvin. 2020. Developing a computing identity framework: Understanding computer science and information technology career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 1 (2020), 1--14.
[13]
N Noy, Deborah L McGuinness, et al. 2001. Ontology development 101. Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University 2001 (2001).
[14]
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. 2018. Assessing and responding to the growth of computer science undergraduate enrollments. National Academies Press.
[15]
Sarah L Rodriguez and Kathleen Lehman. 2017. Developing the next generation of diverse computer scientists: the need for enhanced, intersectional computing identity theory. Computer Science Education 27, 3--4 (2017), 229--247.
[16]
Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip Sadler. 2020. The intersection of being black and being a woman: Examining the effect of social computing relationships on computer science career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 2 (2020), 1--15.
[17]
Johnny Saldaña and Matt Omasta. 2016. Qualitative research: Analyzing life. Sage Publications.
[18]
Ruth HV Sealy and Val Singh. 2010. The importance of role models and demographic context for senior women's work identity development. International Journal of Management Reviews 12, 3 (2010), 284--300.
[19]
Irving Seidman. 2006. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press.
[20]
Sheldon Stryker and Peter J Burke. 2000. The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social psychology quarterly (2000), 284--297.
[21]
Mohsen Taheri, Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Mark Weiss, Michael Georgiopoulos, Ken Christensen, Tiana Solis, Atalie Garcia, and Deepa Chari. 2018. A structural equation model analysis of computing identity sub-constructs and student academic persistence. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1--7.
[22]
National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education. 2018. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). https://nces.ed.gov/ ipeds/use-the-data
[23]
Sepehr Vakil. 2020. "I've always been scared that someday I'm going to sell out": Exploring the relationship between political identity and learning in computer science education. Cognition and Instruction 38, 2 (2020), 87--115. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/07370008.2020.1730374
[24]
Joachim Walther, Nicola W Sochacka, and Nadia N Kellam. 2013. Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study. Journal of Engineering Education 102, 4 (2013), 626--659.
[25]
Billy Wong. 2016. 'I'm good, but not that good': digitally-skilled young people's identity in computing. Computer Science Education 26, 4 (2016), 299--317. https: //doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1292604

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Closing the gender gap in ICT higher education: exploring women’s motivations in pursuing ICT educationFrontiers in Education10.3389/feduc.2024.13520299Online publication date: 8-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Understanding Computing Identity for Latina Students at a Hispanic-Serving Community CollegeJournal of Hispanic Higher Education10.1177/15381927241278299Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Student Perceptions of Computer Science as a ProfessionProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653623(339-345)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. What is a Computer Scientist?: Unpacking the Ontological Beliefs of Black and Hispanic Female Computing Students

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - Volume 1
    February 2022
    1049 pages
    ISBN:9781450390705
    DOI:10.1145/3478431
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 February 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. broadening participation
    2. computer science education
    3. computing education
    4. undergraduate curriculum

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • National Science Foundation

    Conference

    SIGCSE 2022
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

    Upcoming Conference

    SIGCSE TS 2025
    The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
    February 26 - March 1, 2025
    Pittsburgh , PA , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)36
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Closing the gender gap in ICT higher education: exploring women’s motivations in pursuing ICT educationFrontiers in Education10.3389/feduc.2024.13520299Online publication date: 8-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Understanding Computing Identity for Latina Students at a Hispanic-Serving Community CollegeJournal of Hispanic Higher Education10.1177/15381927241278299Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Student Perceptions of Computer Science as a ProfessionProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653623(339-345)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Examining the Relationship between Socioeconomic Status and Beliefs about Large Language Models in an Undergraduate Programming CourseProceedings of the 2024 on ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference V. 110.1145/3649165.3690099(172-178)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2024
    • (2024)Undergraduate Student Attitudes towards a Social Justice Context in a Programming ProjectProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630955(1000-1006)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Recognition experiences of women of color in chemistry: an intersectional studyChemistry Education Research and Practice10.1039/D3RP00278KOnline publication date: 2024
    • (2022)“I Think I Am Getting There” Understanding the Computational Identity of Engineering Students Participating in a Computationally Intensive Thermodynamics CourseBiomedical Engineering Education10.1007/s43683-022-00084-13:1(1-21)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2022

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media