Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3511047.3537649acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

A Mobile Guide to Explore Interconnections between Science, Art and Territory

Published: 04 July 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Most Cultural Heritage mobile guides are developed using a location-based hypertext model that guides the exploration of individual itineraries. However, Cultural Heritage places are often immersed in parallel and interlaced stories about art, history and science, which might be relevant to the tourist. Therefore, we are interested in investigating the semantic connections between the narratives that involve different Point of Interests to provide tourists with interconnected views of the Cultural Heritage of a place.
As a first step in this direction, we present the Triangolazioni mobile guide, which allows users to thematically explore places through the navigation of narratives, and to connect narratives to each other based on topic similarity. Triangolazioni can be accessed from mobile phone, tablet and desktop, and supports the physical and virtual exploration of Points of Interest in the area around Torino, Italy.

References

[1]
Liliana Ardissono, Anna Goy, Giovanna Petrone, Marino Segnan, and Pietro Torasso. 2003. INTRIGUE: personalized recommendation of tourist attractions for desktop and handset devices. Applied Artificial Intelligence, Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence for Cultural Heritage and Digital Libraries 17, 8-9(2003), 687–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/713827254
[2]
Liliana Ardissono, Daniela Petrelli, and Tsvi Kuflik. 2012. Personalization in Cultural Heritage: The Road Travelled and the One Ahead. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. Special Issue on Coming of Age: Celebrating a Quarter Century of User Modeling and Personalization 22, 1-2(2012), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-011-9104-x
[3]
Mark Bernstein. 1998. Patterns of Hypertext. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia: Links, Objects, Time and Space—Structure in Hypermedia Systems: Links, Objects, Time and Space—Structure in Hypermedia Systems (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA) (HYPERTEXT ’98). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/276627.276630
[4]
Mark Blythe, Josephine Reid, Peter C. Wright, and Erik Geelhoed. 2006. Interdisciplinary criticism: Analysing the experience of Riot! a location-sensitive digital narrative. Behaviour & Information Technology 25, 2 (2006), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500331131
[5]
Matthias Braunhofer and Francesco Ricci. 2016. Contextual Information Elicitation in Travel Recommender Systems. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016, Alessandro Inversini and Roland Schegg (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28231-2_42
[6]
John Brooke. 1996. SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation In Industry 189 (11 1996). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35
[7]
Keith Cheverst, Nigel Davies, Keith Mitchell, and Paul Smith. 2000. Providing Tailored (Context-Aware) Information to City Visitors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems. Springer-Verlag, London, UK, UK, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44595-1_8
[8]
Berardina De Carolis, Cristina Gena, Tsvi Kuflik, and Joel Lanir. 2018. Special issue on advanced interfaces for cultural heritage. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 114 (2018), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.02.007 Advanced User Interfaces for Cultural Heritage.
[9]
Susan T. Dumais. 2007. LSA and Information Retrieval. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203936399.ch16
[10]
Charlie Hargood, Verity Hunt, Mark J. Weal, and David E. Millard. 2016. Patterns of Sculptural Hypertext in Location Based Narratives(HT ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1145/2914586.2914595
[11]
Todd Kashdan, Matthew Gallagher, Paul Silvia, Beate Winterstein, William Breen, Daniel Terhar, and Michael Steger. 2009. The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II: Development, Factor Structure, and Psychometrics. Journal of research in personality 43 (12 2009), 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.011
[12]
Pigi Kouki, James Schaffer, Jay Pujara, John O’Donovan, and Lise Getoor. 2019. Personalized explanations for hybrid recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Marina del Ray, California) (IUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302306
[13]
Pigi Kouki, James Schaffer, Jay Pujara, John O’Donovan, and Lise Getoor. 2020. Generating and Understanding Personalized Explanations in Hybrid Recommender Systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 10, 4, Article 31 (nov 2020), 40 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365843
[14]
Tsvi Kuflik, Oliviero Stock, Massimo Zancanaro, Ariel Gorfinkel, Sadek Jbara, Shahar Kats, Julia Sheidin, and Nadav Kashtan. 2011. A Visitor’s Guide in an ”Active Museum”: Presentations, Communications, and Reflection. ACM Journal of Computers and Cultural Heritage 3, 3 (2011), 175–209. https://doi.org/10.1145/1921614.1921618
[15]
Noemi Mauro, Angelo Geninatti Cossatin, Ester Cravero, Liliana Ardissono, Guido Magnano, and Marco Giardino. 2022. Exploring Semantically Interlaced Cultural Heritage Narratives. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HYPERTEXT’22). ACM, Barcelona, Spain, to appear. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511095.3536366
[16]
Noemi Mauro, Gianmarco Izzi, Marco Pellegrino, Liliana Ardissono, Claudio Grandi, Maurizio Lucenteforte, and Marino Segnan. 2020. Faceted Exploration of Cultural Heritage. In Adjunct Publication of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (Genoa, Italy) (UMAP ’20 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386392.3399279
[17]
Martijn Millecamp, Cristina Conati, and Katrien Verbert. 2022. “Knowing me, knowing you”: personalized explanations for a music recommender system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction(2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-021-09304-9
[18]
OWL Services Coalition. 2004. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.1B/owl-s/owl-s.html.
[19]
Yiwen Wang, Natalia Stash, Lora Aroyo, Peter Gorgels, Lloyd Rutledge, and Guus Schreiber. 2008. Recommendations based on semantically enriched museum collections. Journal of Web Semantics 6, 4 (2008), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2008.09.002

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UMAP '22 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
July 2022
409 pages
ISBN:9781450392327
DOI:10.1145/3511047
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 July 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Cultural Heritage
  2. mobile guides

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • Public Engagement Lab - University of Torino

Conference

UMAP '22
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

UMAP '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 121
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)61
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media