Investigating the Impacts of YouTube's Content Policies on Journalism and Political Discourse
Authors: 
Jared Van Natta, Saleem Masadeh, and Bill HamiltonAuthors Info & Claims
Jared Van Natta, Saleem Masadeh, and Bill HamiltonAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 66, Pages 1 - 28
Abstract
Social media has become a primary mode of journalism and political discourse as evidenced by recent online political movements. Platforms like YouTube, by monetizing content through advertising revenue, have fostered a new group of online political professionals, including journalists and commentators. Recently, to limit the spread of misinformation and hateful content, these platforms have begun revising their content monetization, recommendation, and removal policies. To explore the impact on creators, we present an interview based study of journalists and political commentators on YouTube. Our participants report that these policies' implementations are inadequate technically and impacting their ability to survive financially. In their view, these policies may result in the suppression of legitimate reporting and discourse that dissents from mainstream consensus. We identify potential systemic effects of these polices and develop implications for the future design of online media.
References
[1]
2018. Building a better news experience on YouTube, together. YouTube Official Blog (2018). https://youtube.googleblog.com/2018/07/building-better-news-experience-on.html
[2]
2019. Our ongoing work to tackle hate. YouTube Official Blog (2019). https://youtube.googleblog.com/2019/06/our-ongoing-work-to-tackle-hate.html
[3]
2021. An Insight, An Idea with Susan Wojcicki|Global Technology Governance Summit 2021. https://www.weforum.org/events/global-technology-governance-summit-2021/sessions/an-insight-an-idea-with-susan-wojcicki
[4]
Hunt Allcott, Matthew Gentzkow, and Chuan Yu. 2019. Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research & Politics 6, 2 (2019), 2053168019848554.
[5]
Julia Angwin and Hannes Grassegger. 2017. Facebook's secret censorship rules protect white men from hate speech but not black children. Available from: www. p ropub lica. org/a rticl e/fac ebook-hatespee ch-ce nsors hip-i ntern al-do cumen ts-al gorit hms.[Accessed 3 November 2017.] (2017).
[6]
Mihai Avram, Nicholas Micallef, Sameer Patil, and Filippo Menczer. 2020. Exposure to Social Engagement Metrics Increases Vulnerability to Misinformation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.04682 (2020).
[7]
Marina Azzimonti and Marcos Fernandes. 2018. Social media networks, fake news, and polarization. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.
[8]
Vian Bakir and Andrew McStay. 2018. Fake news and the economy of emotions: Problems, causes, solutions. Digital journalism 6, 2 (2018), 154--175.
[9]
David Beers. 2006. The public sphere and online, independent journalism. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation (2006), 109--130.
[10]
Matt Carlson. 2018. Facebook in the news: Social media, journalism, and public responsibility following the 2016 trending topics controversy. Digital journalism 6, 1 (2018), 4--20.
[11]
Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Azadeh Nematzadeh, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2018. How algorithmic popularity bias hinders or promotes quality. Scientific reports 8, 1 (2018), 1--7.
[12]
Katherine Clayton, Spencer Blair, Jonathan A Busam, Samuel Forstner, John Glance, Guy Green, Anna Kawata, Akhila Kovvuri, Jonathan Martin, Evan Morgan, et al . 2019. Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media. Political Behavior (2019), 1--23.
[13]
John W Creswell and J David Creswell. 2017. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA.
[14]
Clara Crivellaro, Rob Comber, John Bowers, Peter C. Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. A Pool of Dreams: Facebook, Politics and the Emergence of a Social Movement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3573--3582. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557100
[15]
Audubon Dougherty. 2011. Live-Streaming Mobile Video: Production as Civic Engagement. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Stockholm, Sweden) (MobileHCI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 425--434. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037437
[16]
Elizabeth Dwoskin, Jeanne Whalen, and Regine Cabato. 2019. Content moderators at YouTube, Facebook and Twitter see the worst of the web and suffer silently. The Washington Post (2019).
[17]
Kristofer Erickson and Martin Kretschmer. 2018. This Video is Unavailable. J. Intell. Prop. Info. Tech. & Elec. Com. L. 9 (2018), 75.
[18]
Seth Flaxman, Sharad Goel, and Justin M Rao. 2013. Ideological segregation and the effects of social media on news consumption. Available at SSRN 2363701 (2013).
[19]
DJ Flynn, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. 2017. The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology 38 (2017), 127--150.
[20]
Google. 2019 (accessed August 31, 2020). YouTube Recommendations. https://support.google.com/youtube/thread/1456096?hl=en
[21]
Google. 2020 (accessed August 31, 2020). YouTube Partner Program Overview & Eligibility. https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/72851?hl=en
[22]
Google. 2020 (accessed August 31, 2020). YouTube Press. https://www.youtube.com/about/press/
[23]
Google. 2020 (accessed August 31, 2021). Responsible Policy Enforcement during COVID-. https://blog.youtube/inside-youtube/responsible-policy-enforcement-during-covid-19/
[24]
Google. 2020 (accessed September 9, 2020). How AdSense Works - AdSense Help Center. https://support.google.com/adsense/answer/6242051?hl=en&ref_topic=1319753
[25]
Robert Gorwa, Reuben Binns, and Christian Katzenbach. 2020. Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data & Society 7, 1 (2020), 2053951719897945.
[26]
Chris Greer and Eugene McLaughlin. 2010. We predict a riot? Public order policing, new media environments and the rise of the citizen journalist. The British Journal of Criminology 50, 6 (2010), 1041--1059.
[27]
Vassia Gueorguieva. 2008. Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The impact of alternative communication channels on the 2006 election cycle and beyond. Social Science Computer Review 26, 3 (2008), 288--300.
[28]
Jessica Guynn. 2021. Do Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube censor Conservatives? USA Today (2021). https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2021/02/01/censorship-conservatives-trump-facebook-twitter-youtube/4316155001/
[29]
Anthony Ha. 2018. YouTube Tightens the Rules Around Creator Monetization and Partnerships. Tech Crunch (2018). https://techcrunch.com/2018/01/16/youtube-tightens-rukles/
[30]
Muhammad Nihal Hussain, Serpil Tokdemir, Nitin Agarwal, and Samer Al-Khateeb. 2018. Analyzing disinformation and crowd manipulation tactics on YouTube. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE, 1092--1095.
[31]
Creator Insider. 2018. Ads Friendly Guidelines - Barbara's Take. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=81&v=x58Ff1-joeU&feature=emb_logo
[32]
Prerna Juneja, Deepika Rama Subramanian, and Tanushree Mitra. 2020. Through the Looking Glass: Study of Transparency in Reddit's Moderation Practices. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, GROUP (2020), 1--35.
[33]
Ilkka Koiranen, Aki Koivula, Sanna Malinen, and Teo Keipi. 2021. Undercurrents of echo chambers and flame wars: party political correlates of social media behavior. Journal of Information Technology & Politics (2021), 1--17.
[34]
David MJ Lazer, Matthew A Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J Berinsky, Kelly M Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, et al. 2018. The science of fake news. Science 359, 6380 (2018), 1094--1096.
[35]
Yu-Hao Lee and Gary Hsieh. 2013. Does slacktivism hurt activism? The effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 811--820.
[36]
Ada Lerner, Helen Yuxun He, Anna Kawakami, Silvia Catherine Zeamer, and Roberto Hoyle. 2020. Privacy and Activism in the Transgender Community. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[37]
Danielle Lottridge and Frank R Bentley. 2018. Let's Hate Together: How People Share News in Messaging, Social, and Public Networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[38]
Jairo Lugo-Ocando. 2014. Blaming the victim: How global journalism fails those in poverty. Pluto Press.
[39]
Renkai Ma and Yubo Kou. 2021. " How advertiser-friendly is my video?": YouTuber's Socioeconomic Interactions with Algorithmic Content Moderation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1--25.
[40]
Md Mahfuzul Haque, Mohammad Yousuf, Ahmed Shatil Alam, Pratyasha Saha, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, and Naeemul Hassan. 2020. Combating Misinformation in Bangladesh: Roles and Responsibilities as Perceived by Journalists, Fact-checkers, and Users. arXiv e-prints (2020), arXiv--2007.
[41]
Jamie Mahoney, Tom Feltwell, Obinna Ajuruchi, and Shaun Lawson. 2016. Constructing the Visual Online Political Self: An Analysis of Instagram Use by the Scottish Electorate. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3339--3351. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858160
[42]
Aaron Mak. 2018. Facebook content moderation rules: How company decides what to remove.
[43]
Sarah Myers West. 2018. Censored, suspended, shadowbanned: User interpretations of content moderation on social media platforms. New Media & Society 20, 11 (2018), 4366--4383.
[44]
BBC Tech Newsroom. 2020. YouTube video removals doubled during lockdown. BBC (2020). https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-53918584
[45]
Jack Nicas. 2017. Google's YouTube Has Continued Showing Brands' Ads With Racist and Other Objectionable Videos. The Wall Street Journal (2017). https://www.wsj.com/articles/googles-youtube-has-continued-showing-brands-ads-with-racist-and-other-objectionable-videos-1490380551.
[46]
OptOut. 2022. OptOut News - About. https://www.optout.news/about
[47]
Jack O'Reilly, Lara. Nicas. 2017. YouTube Wins Back Some Marketers After Ad Uproar, but Others Stay Away. The Wall Street Journal (2017).
[48]
Gordon Pennycook, Adam Bear, Evan T Collins, and David G Rand. 2020. The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings. Management Science (2020).
[49]
Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Raphael Ottoni, Robert West, Virgílio AF Almeida, and Wagner Meira Jr. 2020. Auditing radicalization pathways on youtube. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 131--141.
[50]
Dennis Romero. 2020. YouTube thrives as a window for those isolated by coronavirus. NBC (2020). https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/youtube-thrives-window-those-isolated-coronavirus-n1173651
[51]
Kevin Roose and Kate Conger. 2019. YouTube to Remove Thousands of Videos Pushing Extreme Views. The New York Times (2019). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/05/business/youtube-remove-extremist-videos.html
[52]
Elisa Shearer and Elizabeth Grieco. 2019. Americans are wary of the role social media sites play in delivering the news. Pew Research Center 2 (2019).
[53]
Jieun Shin, Lian Jian, Kevin Driscoll, and François Bar. 2018. The diffusion of misinformation on social media: Temporal pattern, message, and source. Computers in Human Behavior 83 (2018), 278--287.
[54]
Kai Shu, Suhang Wang, and Huan Liu. 2018. Understanding user profiles on social media for fake news detection. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR). IEEE, 430--435.
[55]
Michael Soha and Zachary J McDowell. 2016. Monetizing a meme: YouTube, content ID, and the Harlem Shake. Social Media Society 2, 1 (2016), 2056305115623801.
[56]
Melodie Yun-Ju Song and Anatoliy Gruzd. 2017. Examining sentiments and popularity of pro-and anti-vaccination videos on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on social media & society. 1--8.
[57]
Dominic Spohr. 2017. Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media. Business Information Review 34, 3 (2017), 150--160.
[58]
Kate Starbird, Ahmer Arif, and Tom Wilson. 2019. Disinformation as Collaborative Work: Surfacing the Participatory Nature of Strategic Information Operations. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 127 (Nov. 2019), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359229
[59]
Kate Starbird, Dharma Dailey, Owla Mohamed, Gina Lee, and Emma S Spiro. 2018. Engage early, correct more: How journalists participate in false rumors online during crisis events. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 105.
[60]
Galen Stocking, Patrick Van Kessel, Michael Barthell, Katerina Eva Matsa, and Maya Khuzum. 2020. Many Americans, Get News on YouTube, Where News Organizations, and Independent Producers Thrive Side by Side. Pew Research Center (2020).
[61]
Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1994. Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research 17 (1994), 273--85.
[62]
Matus Tomlein, Branislav Pecher, Jakub Simko, Ivan Srba, Robert Moro, Elena Stefancova, Michal Kompan, Andrea Hrckova, Juraj Podrouzek, and Maria Bielikova. 2021. An Audit of Misinformation Filter Bubbles on YouTube: Bubble Bursting and Recent Behavior Changes. In Fifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1--11.
[63]
Ryan Tracy. 2017. Tech Giants Draw Fire in Congress. The Wall Street Journal (2017).
[64]
Dhavan V. Shah, Nojin Kwak Kwak, and R. Lance Holbert. 2001. "Connecting" and "disconnecting" with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political communication 18, 2 (2001), 141--162.
[65]
Kristen Vaccaro, Christian Sandvig, and Karrie Karahalios. 2020. "At the End of the Day Facebook Does What It Wants" How Users Experience Contesting Algorithmic Content Moderation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1--22.
Index Terms
- Investigating the Impacts of YouTube's Content Policies on Journalism and Political Discourse
Recommendations
Political Will and Strategic Use of YouTube to Advancing Government Transparency: An Analysis of Jakarta Government-Generated YouTube Videos
EGOV 2013: Proceedings of the 12th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government - Volume 8074Government transparency is critical to cut government bureaucracy and corruption, which diminish political accountability and legitimacy, erode trust in government, and hinder citizen engagement and government performance. Previously, Jakarta's local ...
Exploring the user-generated content (UGC) uploading behavior on youtube
WWW '14 Companion: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide WebYouTube is the world's largest video sharing platform where both professional and non-professional users participate in creating, uploading, and viewing content. In this work, we analyze content in the music category created by the non-professionals, ...
Profiling Online Political Content Creators: Advancing the Paths to Democracy
The Internet has allowed digital media users to be more than just consumers of political information, allowing the chance to create their own online political content. Thus, users can now create personal blogs, post comments on others' blogs, contribute ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 16 April 2023
Published in PACMHCI Volume 7, Issue CSCW1
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
- U.S. Department of Education
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 157Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)106
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in