Power in Human-Robot Interaction
Pages 269 - 282
Abstract
Power is a fundamental determinant of social life, yet it remains elusive in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). This paper unveils power's pervasive but largely unexplored role in HRI by systematically investigating its varied manifestations across HRI literature. We first introduce definitions of power and then delve into the existing HRI literature through a lens of power, examining studies that directly address power and those exploring power-related social configurations and concepts such as authority, dominance, and status. Leveraging Fiske and Berdahl's model and French and Raven's bases of power framework, we also explore the nuances of power in many HRI studies where power is not explicitly addressed. Finally, we propose power as a core concept to advance HRI--- explaining fragmented existing findings through a coherent theory and delineating a cohesive theoretical trajectory for future investigations.
References
[1]
Ernest Adams. 1962. Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting.
[2]
Henny Admoni, Bradley Hayes, David Feil-Seifer, Daniel Ullman, and Brian Scassellati. 2013. Are you looking at me? Perception of robot attention is mediated by gaze type and group size. In 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 389--395.
[3]
Siddharth Agrawal and Mary-Anne Williams. 2017. Robot authority and human obedience: A study of human behaviour using a robot security guard. In Proceedings of the companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 57--58.
[4]
Siddharth Agrawal and Mary-Anne Williams. 2018. Would you obey an aggressive robot: A human-robot interaction field study. In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 240--246.
[5]
A. Allen. 1999. The Power of Feminist Theory: Domination, Resistance, Solidarity. Avalon Publishing. 98041071 https://books.google.com/books?id=WvwtmQEACAAJ
[6]
Amy Allen. 2007. The Politics of Our Selves. Columbia University Press, New York Chichester, West Sussex. https://doi.org/
[7]
Mehdi Ammi, Virginie Demulier, Sylvain Caillou, Yoren Gaffary, Yacine Tsalamlal, Jean-Claude Martin, and Adriana Tapus. 2015a. Haptic Human-Robot Affective Interaction in a Handshaking Social Protocol. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Portland, Oregon, USA) (HRI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 263--270. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696485
[8]
Mehdi Ammi, Virginie Demulier, Sylvain Caillou, Yoren Gaffary, Yacine Tsalamlal, Jean-Claude Martin, and Adriana Tapus. 2015b. Haptic human-robot affective interaction in a handshaking social protocol. In Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 263--270.
[9]
Sean Andrist, Erin Spannan, and Bilge Mutlu. 2013. Rhetorical robots: making robots more effective speakers using linguistic cues of expertise. In 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 341--348.
[10]
Hannah Arendt. 1957. The human condition. University of Chicago press.
[11]
Stephanie Arevalo Arboleda, Max Pascher, Annalies Baumeister, Barbara Klein, and Jens Gerken. 2021. Reflecting upon Participatory Design in Human-Robot Collaboration for People with Motor Disabilities: Challenges and Lessons Learned from Three Multiyear Projects. In The 14th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference. 147--155.
[12]
Alexander Mois Aroyo, T Kyohei, Tora Koyama, Hideyuki Takahashi, Francesco Rea, Alessandra Sciutti, Yuichiro Yoshikawa, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Giulio Sandini. 2018. Will people morally crack under the authority of a famous wicked robot?. In 2018 27th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 35--42.
[13]
Zahra Ashktorab, Q Vera Liao, Casey Dugan, James Johnson, Qian Pan, Wei Zhang, Sadhana Kumaravel, and Murray Campbell. 2020. Human-ai collaboration in a cooperative game setting: Measuring social perception and outcomes. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1--20.
[14]
Ilhan Bae and Jeonghye Han. 2017. Does Height Affect the Strictness of Robot Assisted Teacher?. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 73--74.
[15]
Robert F Bales. 1950. Interaction process analysis; a method for the study of small groups. (1950).
[16]
Jimmy Baraglia, Maya Cakmak, Yukie Nagai, Rajesh Rao, and Minoru Asada. 2016. Initiative in robot assistance during collaborative task execution. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI). IEEE, 67--74.
[17]
Barry Barnes. 1988. The nature of power. (No Title) (1988).
[18]
Christoph Bartneck, Marcel Verbunt, Omar Mubin, and Abdullah Al Mahmud. 2007. To Kill a Mockingbird Robot. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Arlington, Virginia, USA) (HRI '07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81--87. https://doi.org/10.1145/1228716.1228728
[19]
Christoph Bartneck, Kumar Yogeeswaran, Qi Min Ser, Graeme Woodward, Robert Sparrow, Siheng Wang, and Friederike Eyssel. 2018. Robots and racism. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 196--204.
[20]
Nikolaus Bee, Stefan Franke, and Elisabeth Andreé. 2009. Relations between facial display, eye gaze and head tilt: Dominance perception variations of virtual agents. In 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops. IEEE, 1--7.
[21]
Tapomayukh Bhattacharjee, Ethan K Gordon, Rosario Scalise, Maria E Cabrera, Anat Caspi, Maya Cakmak, and Siddhartha S Srinivasa. 2020. Is more autonomy always better? exploring preferences of users with mobility impairments in robot-assisted feeding. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 181--190.
[22]
Dravz en Brvs vc ić, Hiroyuki Kidokoro, Yoshitaka Suehiro, and Takayuki Kanda. 2015. Escaping from children's abuse of social robots. In Proceedings of the tenth annual acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction. 59--66.
[23]
De'Aira Bryant, Jason Borenstein, and Ayanna Howard. 2020. Why should we gender? The effect of robot gendering and occupational stereotypes on human trust and perceived competency. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 13--21.
[24]
Julia Cambre and Chinmay Kulkarni. 2019. One voice fits all? Social implications and research challenges of designing voices for smart devices. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--19.
[25]
Dorwin Cartwright and James March. 1965. Handbook of Organizations.
[26]
Cristiano Castelfranchi and Rino Falcone. 2003. From automaticity to autonomy: the frontier of artificial agents. Agent autonomy (2003), 103--136.
[27]
Shruti Chandra, Raul Paradeda, Hang Yin, Pierre Dillenbourg, Rui Prada, and Ana Paiva. 2018. Do children perceive whether a robotic peer is learning or not?. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 41--49.
[28]
Tiffany L. Chen, Chih-Hung King, Andrea L. Thomaz, and Charles C. Kemp. 2011. Touched by a Robot: An Investigation of Subjective Responses to Robot-Initiated Touch. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Lausanne, Switzerland) (HRI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 457--464. https://doi.org/10.1145/1957656.1957818
[29]
EunJeong Cheon and Norman Makoto Su. 2016. Integrating roboticist values into a Value Sensitive Design framework for humanoid robots. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 375--382.
[30]
EunJeong Cheon and Norman Makoto Su. 2017. Configuring the User: " Robots have Needs Too". In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 191--206.
[31]
Vijay Chidambaram, Yueh-Hsuan Chiang, and Bilge Mutlu. 2012. Designing persuasive robots: how robots might persuade people using vocal and nonverbal cues. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 293--300.
[32]
Meia Chita-Tegmark, Monika Lohani, and Matthias Scheutz. 2019. Gender effects in perceptions of robots and humans with varying emotional intelligence. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 230--238.
[33]
Francesca Ciardo, Davide De Tommaso, and Agnieszka Wykowska. 2019. Humans socially attune to their "follower" robot. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 538--539.
[34]
Houston Claure, Yifang Chen, Jignesh Modi, Malte Jung, and Stefanos Nikolaidis. 2020. Multi-armed bandits with fairness constraints for distributing resources to human teammates. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 299--308.
[35]
Stewart R Clegg. 1989. Frameworks of power. Frameworks of Power (1989), 1--320.
[36]
Simon Coghlan, Jenny Waycott, Amanda Lazar, and Barbara Barbosa Neves. 2021. Dignity, autonomy, and style of company: Dimensions older adults consider for robot companions. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--25.
[37]
Patricia Hill Collins. 1990. Black feminist thought in the matrix of domination. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment, Vol. 138, 1990 (1990), 221--238.
[38]
Joe Connolly, Viola Mocz, Nicole Salomons, Joseph Valdez, Nathan Tsoi, Brian Scassellati, and Marynel Vázquez. 2020. Prompting Prosocial Human Interventions in Response to Robot Mistreatment. In HRI, Vol. 20. 211--220.
[39]
Karen S Cook, Richard M Emerson, Mary R Gillmore, and Toshio Yamagishi. 1983. The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. American journal of sociology, Vol. 89, 2 (1983), 275--305.
[40]
Derek Cormier, Gem Newman, Masayuki Nakane, James E Young, and Stephane Durocher. 2013. Would you do as a robot commands? an obedience study for human-robot interaction. In International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction. 1--3.
[41]
Filipa Correia, Samuel Mascarenhas, Rui Prada, Francisco S Melo, and Ana Paiva. 2018. Group-based emotions in teams of humans and robots. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 261--269.
[42]
Robert A Dahl. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral science, Vol. 2, 3 (1957), 201--215.
[43]
Kerstin Dautenhahn, Michael Walters, Sarah Woods, Kheng Lee Koay, Chrystopher L Nehaniv, A Sisbot, Rachid Alami, and Thierry Siméon. 2006. How may I serve you? A robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction. 172--179.
[44]
Eric Dépret and Susan T Fiske. 1993. Social cognition and power: Some cognitive consequences of social structure as a source of control deprivation. Control motivation and social cognition (1993), 176--202.
[45]
Amol Deshmukh and Ruth Aylett. 2012. Socially Constrained Management of Power Resources for Social Mobile Robots. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (HRI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 119--120. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157714
[46]
Catherine D'ignazio and Lauren F Klein. 2023. Data feminism. MIT press.
[47]
Hubert L Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow. 2014. Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. University of Chicago press.
[48]
Skyla Y Dudek and James E Young. 2022. Fluid sex robots: Looking to the 2LGBTQIA community to shape the future of sex robots. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 746--749.
[49]
Juan Fasola and Maja J Mataric. 2012. Using socially assistive human--robot interaction to motivate physical exercise for older adults. Proc. IEEE, Vol. 100, 8 (2012), 2512--2526.
[50]
Susan T Fiske and Jennifer Berdahl. 2007. Social power. (2007).
[51]
Jodi Forlizzi and Carl DiSalvo. 2006. Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction. 258--265.
[52]
Marlena R Fraune, Yusaku Nishiwaki, Selma Sabanović, Eliot R Smith, and Michio Okada. 2017. Threatening flocks and mindful snowflakes: How group entitativity affects perceptions of robots. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 205--213.
[53]
John R French, Bertram Raven, and Dorwin Cartwright. 1959. The bases of social power. Classics of organization theory, Vol. 7, 311--320 (1959), 1.
[54]
Adam D Galinsky, Derek D Rucker, and Joe C Magee. 2015. Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. (2015).
[55]
Denise Geiskkovitch, Stela Seo, and James E Young. 2015. Autonomy, embodiment, and obedience to robots. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts. 235--236.
[56]
Denise Y Geiskkovitch, Derek Cormier, Stela H Seo, and James E Young. 2016. Please continue, we need more data: an exploration of obedience to robots. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, Vol. 5, 1 (2016), 82--99.
[57]
Aimi Shazwani Ghazali, Jaap Ham, Emilia Barakova, and Panos Markopoulos. 2018. The influence of social cues in persuasive social robots on psychological reactance and compliance. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 87 (2018), 58--65.
[58]
Matthew E Gladden. 2014. The Social Robot as' Charismatic Leader': A Phenomenology of Human Submission to Nonhuman Power. In Robophilosophy. 329--339.
[59]
Gerhard Göhler. 2009. Power to and power over. The Sage handbook of power (2009), 27--39.
[60]
Matthew C Gombolay, Reymundo A Gutierrez, Shanelle G Clarke, Giancarlo F Sturla, and Julie A Shah. 2015. Decision-making authority, team efficiency and human worker satisfaction in mixed human--robot teams. Autonomous Robots, Vol. 39 (2015), 293--312.
[61]
Goren Gordon, Cynthia Breazeal, and Susan Engel. 2015. Can children catch curiosity from a social robot?. In Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 91--98.
[62]
Heather Griffiths, Nathan Keirns, Eric Strayer, Tommy Sadler, Susan Cody-Rydzewski, Gail Scaramuzzo, Sally Vyain, Jeff Bry, Faye Jones, Pamela Alcasey, et al. 2012. Power and Authority. Introduction to Sociology (2012).
[63]
Victoria Groom, Jimmy Chen, Theresa Johnson, F Arda Kara, and Clifford Nass. 2010. Critic, compatriot, or chump?: Responses to robot blame attribution. In 2010 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI). IEEE, 211--217.
[64]
Victoria Groom, Vasant Srinivasan, Cindy L Bethel, Robin Murphy, Lorin Dole, and Clifford Nass. 2011. Responses to robot social roles and social role framing. In 2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS). IEEE, 194--203.
[65]
Jaap Ham, René Bokhorst, Raymond Cuijpers, David Van Der Pol, and John-John Cabibihan. 2011. Making robots persuasive: the influence of combining persuasive strategies (gazing and gestures) by a storytelling robot on its persuasive power. In Social Robotics: Third International Conference, ICSR 2011, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, November 24--25, 2011. Proceedings 3. Springer, 71--83.
[66]
Kerstin S Haring, Kelly M Satterfield, Chad C Tossell, Ewart J De Visser, Joseph R Lyons, Vincent F Mancuso, Victor S Finomore, and Gregory J Funke. 2021. Robot authority in human-robot teaming: Effects of human-likeness and physical embodiment on compliance. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12 (2021), 625713.
[67]
Mojgan Hashemian. 2019. Persuasive Social Robots using Social Power Dynamics. In AAMAS. 2408--2410.
[68]
Mojgan Hashemian, Marta Couto, Samuel Mascarenhas, Ana Paiva, Pedro A Santos, and Rui Prada. 2020a. Investigating reward/punishment strategies in the persuasiveness of social robots. In 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 863--868.
[69]
Mojgan Hashemian, Marta Couto, Samuel Mascarenhas, Ana Paiva, Pedro A. Santos, and Rui Prada. 2020b. Persuasive Social Robots Using Reward/Coercion Strategies. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 230--232. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378373
[70]
Mojgan Hashemian, Marta Couto, Samuel Mascarenhas, Ana Paiva, Pedro A Santos, and Rui Prada. 2020c. Persuasive social robots using reward/coercion strategies. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 230--232.
[71]
Mojgan Hashemian, Marta Couto, Samuel Mascarenhas, Ana Paiva, Pedro A Santos, and Rui Prada. 2021. Persuasive Social Robot Using Reward Power over Repeated Instances of Persuasion. In Persuasive Technology: 16th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2021, Virtual Event, April 12--14, 2021, Proceedings. Springer International Publishing Cham, 63--70.
[72]
Mojgan Hashemian, Samuel Mascarenhas, Marta Couto, Ana Paiva, Pedro A. Santos, and Rui Prada. 2020d. The Application of Social Power in Persuasive Social Robots. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 564--566. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3377447
[73]
Mojgan Hashemian, Samuel Mascarenhas, Marta Couto, Ana Paiva, Pedro A Santos, and Rui Prada. 2020 e. The application of social power in persuasive social robots. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 564--566.
[74]
Mojgan Hashemian, Ana Paiva, Samuel Mascarenhas, Pedro A Santos, and Rui Prada. 2019a. The power to persuade: a study of social power in human-robot interaction. In 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 1--8.
[75]
Mojgan Hashemian, Ana Paiva, Samuel Mascarenhas, Pedro Alexandre Santos, and Rui Prada. 2019b. Social Power in Human-Robot Interaction: Towards More Persuasive Robots. In AAMAS. 2015--2017.
[76]
Mojgan Hashemian, Rui Prada, Pedro A Santos, and Samuel Mascarenhas. 2018. Enhancing social believability of virtual agents using social power dynamics. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. 147--152.
[77]
Mark Haugaard. 1997. The constitution of power: a theoretical analysis of power, knowledge and structure. Manchester University Press.
[78]
Mark Haugaard. 2010. Power: A family resemblance'concept. European journal of cultural studies, Vol. 13, 4 (2010), 419--438.
[79]
Guy Hoffman, Jodi Forlizzi, Shahar Ayal, Aaron Steinfeld, John Antanitis, Guy Hochman, Eric Hochendoner, and Justin Finkenaur. 2015. Robot presence and human honesty: Experimental evidence. In proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 181--188.
[80]
Laura Hoffmann, Nikolai Bock, and Astrid M. Rosenthal v.d. Pütten. 2018. The Peculiarities of Robot Embodiment (EmCorp-Scale): Development, Validation and Initial Test of the Embodiment and Corporeality of Artificial Agents Scale. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 370--378. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171242
[81]
Deanna Hood, Séverin Lemaignan, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2015. When children teach a robot to write: An autonomous teachable humanoid which uses simulated handwriting. In Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 83--90.
[82]
Yoyo Tsung-Yu Hou, Wen-Ying Lee, and Malte Jung. 2023. Should I Follow the Human, or Follow the Robot"-Robots in Power Can Have More Influence Than Humans on Decision-Making. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[83]
Iris Howley, Takayuki Kanda, Kotaro Hayashi, and Carolyn Rosé. 2014. Effects of social presence and social role on help-seeking and learning. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. 415--422.
[84]
Carlos T. Ishi, ChaoRan Liu, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. 2010. Head Motions during Dialogue Speech and Nod Timing Control in Humanoid Robots. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Osaka, Japan) (HRI '10). IEEE Press, 293--300.
[85]
Ryan Blake Jackson, Tom Williams, and Nicole Smith. 2020. Exploring the role of gender in perceptions of robotic noncompliance. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 559--567.
[86]
Wonse Jo, Jee Hwan Park, Sangjun Lee, Ahreum Lee, and Byung-Cheol Min. 2020. Design of a Human Multi-Robot Interaction Medium of Cognitive Perception. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Daegu, Republic of Korea) (HRI '19). IEEE Press, 652--653.
[87]
Himavath Jois and Alan R Wagner. 2021. What happens when robots punish evaluating human task performance during robot-initiated punishment. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), Vol. 10, 4 (2021), 1--18.
[88]
Wendy Ju. 2016. Power in Human Robot Interactions. In Robophilosophy/Transor. 13--14.
[89]
Takayuki Kanda, Masahiro Shiomi, Zenta Miyashita, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. 2009. An affective guide robot in a shopping mall. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. 173--180.
[90]
Merel Keijsers and Christoph Bartneck. 2018. Mindless Robots Get Bullied. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 205--214. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171266
[91]
James Kennedy, Paul Baxter, and Tony Belpaeme. 2015. The robot who tried too hard: Social behaviour of a robot tutor can negatively affect child learning. In Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 67--74.
[92]
Hammad ur Rahman Khan. 2018. RescueBot: Search - Rescue - Robot. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 351--352. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3177819
[93]
Boyoung Kim, Ruchen Wen, Qin Zhu, Tom Williams, and Elizabeth Phillips. 2021. Robots as Moral Advisors: The Effects of Deontological, Virtue, and Confucian Role Ethics on Encouraging Honest Behavior. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boulder, CO, USA) (HRI '21 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 10--18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3446908
[94]
Keunwook Kim, Minkyung Kim, Hotae Lee, Jaehoon Kim, and Jungwook Moon. 2020. A Contextual Inquiry of AVEC: Power Assist Wheelchair Enhancing Communication. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Daegu, Republic of Korea) (HRI '19). IEEE Press, 642--643.
[95]
Kheng Lee Koay, Kerstin Dautenhahn, SN Woods, and Michael L Walters. 2006. Empirical results from using a comfort level device in human-robot interaction studies. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction. 194--201.
[96]
Cherie Lacey and Catherine Caudwell. 2019. Cuteness as a dark pattern'in home robots. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 374--381.
[97]
Kate Ladenheim, Reika McNish, Wali Rizvi, and Amy LaViers. 2020. Live dance performance investigating the feminine cyborg metaphor with a motion-activated wearable robot. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 243--251.
[98]
Hee Rin Lee, EunJeong Cheon, Chaeyun Lim, and Kerstin Fischer. 2022. Configuring Humans: What Roles Humans Play in HRI Research. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 478--492.
[99]
Min Kyung Lee. 2018. Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data & Society, Vol. 5, 1 (2018), 2053951718756684.
[100]
Min Kyung Lee, Jodi Forlizzi, Paul E Rybski, Frederick Crabbe, Wayne Chung, Josh Finkle, Eric Glaser, and Sara Kiesler. 2009. The snackbot: documenting the design of a robot for long-term human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. 7--14.
[101]
Min Kyung Lee, Sara Kiesler, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. Receptionist or information kiosk: how do people talk with a robot?. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 31--40.
[102]
Min Kyung Lee, Daniel Kusbit, Anson Kahng, Ji Tae Kim, Xinran Yuan, Allissa Chan, Daniel See, Ritesh Noothigattu, Siheon Lee, Alexandros Psomas, et al. 2019. WeBuildAI: Participatory framework for algorithmic governance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--35.
[103]
Yi-Chieh Lee, Naomi Yamashita, and Yun Huang. 2020. Designing a chatbot as a mediator for promoting deep self-disclosure to a real mental health professional. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW1 (2020), 1--27.
[104]
Xin Lei and Pei-Luen Patrick Rau. 2021. Effect of relative status on responsibility attributions in human--robot collaboration: Mediating role of sense of responsibility and moderating role of power distance orientation. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 122 (2021), 106820.
[105]
Dan Leyzberg, Eleanor Avrunin, Jenny Liu, and Brian Scassellati. 2011. Robots that express emotion elicit better human teaching. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. 347--354.
[106]
Jamy Li. 2016. Robot Status: Investigating the Perception of Social Status in a Robot. Ph.,D. Dissertation. Stanford University.
[107]
Jamy Li, Andrea Cuadra, Brian Mok, Byron Reeves, Jofish Kaye, and Wendy Ju. 2019. Communicating dominance in a nonanthropomorphic robot using locomotion. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), Vol. 8, 1 (2019), 1--14.
[108]
Jamy Li, Wendy Ju, and Cliff Nass. 2015. Observer perception of dominance and mirroring behavior in human-robot relationships. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 133--140.
[109]
Phoebe Liu, Dylan F Glas, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. 2013. It's not polite to point Generating socially-appropriate deictic behaviors towards people. In 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 267--274.
[110]
Sara Ljungblad, Jirina Kotrbova, Mattias Jacobsson, Henriette Cramer, and Karol Niechwiadowicz. 2012. Hospital robot at work: something alien or an intelligent colleague?. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. 177--186.
[111]
Miriam A Locher. 2010. Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication. Vol. 12. Walter de Gruyter.
[112]
Diana Löffler, Judith Dörrenb"acher, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2020. The uncanny valley effect in zoomorphic robots: The U-shaped relation between animal likeness and likeability. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 261--270.
[113]
Gale M Lucas, Jill Boberg, David Traum, Ron Artstein, Jonathan Gratch, Alesia Gainer, Emmanuel Johnson, Anton Leuski, and Mikio Nakano. 2018. Getting to know each other: The role of social dialogue in recovery from errors in social robots. In Proceedings of the 2018 acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction. 344--351.
[114]
Steven Lukes. 1974. Power: A radical view. Bloomsbury Publishing.
[115]
Steven Lukes. 1986. Power.
[116]
Eleonore Lumer and Hendrik Buschmeier. 2022. Perception of Power and Distance in Human-Human and Human-Robot Role-Based Relations. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan) (HRI '22). IEEE Press, 895--899.
[117]
Risa Maeda, Dravz en Brvs vc ić, and Takayuki Kanda. 2021. Influencing moral behavior through mere observation of robot work: Video-based survey on littering behavior. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 83--91.
[118]
Joe C Magee and Adam D Galinsky. 2008. 8 social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The academy of management annals, Vol. 2, 1 (2008), 351--398.
[119]
Bertram F Malle, Matthias Scheutz, Thomas Arnold, John Voiklis, and Corey Cusimano. 2015. Sacrifice one for the good of many? People apply different moral norms to human and robot agents. In Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 117--124.
[120]
Nikolas Martelaro, Victoria C Nneji, Wendy Ju, and Pamela Hinds. 2016. Tell me more designing hri to encourage more trust, disclosure, and companionship. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 181--188.
[121]
Shizuko Matsuzoe, Hideaki Kuzuoka, and Fumihide Tanaka. 2014. Learning English words with the aid of an autonomous care-receiving robot in a children's group activity. In The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 802--807.
[122]
Christoforos Mavrogiannis and Ross A. Knepper. 2017. Designing Algorithms For Socially Competent Robotic Navigation. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Vienna, Austria) (HRI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 357--358. https://doi.org/10.1145/3029798.3034810
[123]
Conor McGinn and Ilaria Torre. 2019. Can you tell the robot by the voice? An exploratory study on the role of voice in the perception of robots. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 211--221.
[124]
Stanley Milgram. 1963. Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of abnormal and social psychology, Vol. 67, 4 (1963), 371.
[125]
Elliot G Mitchell, Rosa Maimone, Andrea Cassells, Jonathan N Tobin, Patricia Davidson, Arlene M Smaldone, and Lena Mamykina. 2021. Automated vs. human health coaching: Exploring participant and practitioner experiences. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--37.
[126]
Kazuki Mizumaru, Satoru Satake, Takayuki Kanda, and Tetsuo Ono. 2019. Stop doing it! Approaching strategy for a robot to admonish pedestrians. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 449--457.
[127]
Youssef Mohamed and Séverin Lemaignan. 2021. Predicting Human Interactivity State from Surrounding Social Signals. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boulder, CO, USA) (HRI '21 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 540--543. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3447230
[128]
Mayumi Mohan, Anouk Neerincx, Cristina Zaga, and Naomi T. Fitter. 2022. Workshop YOUR Study Design! Participatory Critique and Refinement of Participants' Studies. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan) (HRI '22). IEEE Press, 1281--1283.
[129]
Brian Mok. 2016. Effects of Proactivity and Expressivity on Collaboration with Interactive Robotic Drawers. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (Christchurch, New Zealand) (HRI '16). IEEE Press, 633--634.
[130]
Brian Ka-Jun Mok, Stephen Yang, David Sirkin, and Wendy Ju. 2015. A place for every tool and every tool in its place: Performing collaborative tasks with interactive robotic drawers. In 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 700--706.
[131]
Ajung Moon, Maneezhay Hashmi, HF Machiel Van Der Loos, Elizabeth A Croft, and Aude Billard. 2021. Design of hesitation gestures for nonverbal human-robot negotiation of conflicts. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), Vol. 10, 3 (2021), 1--25.
[132]
AJung Moon, Chris AC Parker, Elizabeth A Croft, and HF Machiel Van der Loos. 2013. Design and impact of hesitation gestures during human-robot resource conflicts. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, Vol. 2, 3 (2013), 18--40.
[133]
AJung Moon, Daniel M Troniak, Brian Gleeson, Matthew KXJ Pan, Minhua Zheng, Benjamin A Blumer, Karon MacLean, and Elizabeth A Croft. 2014. Meet me where i'm gazing: how shared attention gaze affects human-robot handover timing. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. 334--341.
[134]
Dylan Moore, Rebecca Currano, Michael Shanks, and David Sirkin. 2020. Defense Against the Dark Cars: Design Principles for Griefing of Autonomous Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 201--209. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374796
[135]
Masahiro Mori, Karl F MacDorman, and Norri Kageki. 2012. The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & automation magazine, Vol. 19, 2 (2012), 98--100.
[136]
Terran Mott, Alexandra Bejarano, and Tom Williams. 2022. Robot Co-Design Can Help Us Engage Child Stakeholders in Ethical Reflection. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan) (HRI '22). IEEE Press, 14--23.
[137]
Ryo Murakami, Luis Yoichi Morales Saiki, Satoru Satake, Takayuki Kanda, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2014. Destination Unknown: Walking Side-by-Side without Knowing the Goal. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Bielefeld, Germany) (HRI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 471--478. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559665
[138]
Bilge Mutlu, Toshiyuki Shiwa, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. 2009. Footing in human-robot conversations: how robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. 61--68.
[139]
Kayako Nakagawa, Masahiro Shiomi, Kazuhiko Shinozawa, Reo Matsumura, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. 2011. Effect of robot's active touch on people's motivation. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction. 465--472.
[140]
Yukiko I Nakano, Takashi Yoshino, Misato Yatsushiro, and Yutaka Takase. 2015. Generating robot gaze on the basis of participation roles and dominance estimation in multiparty interaction. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), Vol. 5, 4 (2015), 1--23.
[141]
Manisha Natarajan and Matthew Gombolay. 2020. Effects of anthropomorphism and accountability on trust in human robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 33--42.
[142]
Stefanos Nikolaidis, Swaprava Nath, Ariel D Procaccia, and Siddhartha Srinivasa. 2017a. Game-theoretic modeling of human adaptation in human-robot collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 323--331.
[143]
Stefanos Nikolaidis, Yu Xiang Zhu, David Hsu, and Siddhartha Srinivasa. 2017b. Human-robot mutual adaptation in shared autonomy. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 294--302.
[144]
Raquel Oliveira, Patr'icia Arriaga, Patr'icia Alves-Oliveira, Filipa Correia, Sofia Petisca, and Ana Paiva. 2018. Friends or foes? Socioemotional support and gaze behaviors in mixed groups of humans and robots. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 279--288.
[145]
Jahna Otterbacher and Michael Talias. 2017. S/he's too warm/agentic! The influence of gender on uncanny reactions to robots. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 214--223.
[146]
Jennifer R Overbeck and Bernadette Park. 2001. When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 81, 4 (2001), 549.
[147]
Steffi Paepcke and Leila Takayama. 2010. Judging a bot by its cover: An experiment on expectation setting for personal robots. In 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 45--52.
[148]
Ana Lucia Pais and Aude Billard. 2014. Encoding Bi-Manual Coordination Patterns from Human Demonstrations. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Bielefeld, Germany) (HRI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 264--265. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559844
[149]
Ana Lucia Pais Ureche and Aude Billard. 2015. Analyzing Human Behavior and Bootstrapping Task Constraints from Kinesthetic Demonstrations. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts (Portland, Oregon, USA) (HRI'15 Extended Abstracts). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 199--200. https://doi.org/10.1145/2701973.2702731
[150]
Talcott Parsons. 1963. On the concept of political power. Proceedings of the American philosophical society, Vol. 107, 3 (1963), 232--262.
[151]
Denis Pe na and Fumihide Tanaka. 2018. Touch to Feel Me: Designing a Robot for Thermo-Emotional Communication. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 207--208. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3177016
[152]
Giulia Perugia, Stefano Guidi, Margherita Bicchi, and Oronzo Parlangeli. 2022. The Shape of Our Bias: Perceived Age and Gender in the Humanoid Robots of the ABOT Database. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan) (HRI '22). IEEE Press, 110--119.
[153]
Aaron Powers and Sara Kiesler. 2006. The advisor robot: tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction. 218--225.
[154]
Akanksha Prakash, Jenay M Beer, Travis Deyle, Cory-Ann Smarr, Tiffany L Chen, Tracy L Mitzner, Charles C Kemp, and Wendy A Rogers. 2013. Older adults' medication management in the home: How can robots help?. In 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 283--290.
[155]
Irene Rae, Leila Takayama, and Bilge Mutlu. 2013. The influence of height in robot-mediated communication. In 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 1--8.
[156]
Daniel J Rea, Sebastian Schneider, and Takayuki Kanda. 2021. " Is this all you can do? harder!" the effects of (im) polite robot encouragement on exercise effort. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 225--233.
[157]
Daniel J Rea, Yan Wang, and James E Young. 2015. Check your stereotypes at the door: an analysis of gender typecasts in social human-robot interaction. In Social Robotics: 7th International Conference, ICSR 2015, Paris, France, October 26--30, 2015, Proceedings 7. Springer, 554--563.
[158]
Natalia Reich-Stiebert and Friederike Eyssel. 2017. (Ir) relevance of gender? On the influence of gender stereotypes on learning with a robot. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 166--176.
[159]
Paul Robinette, Wenchen Li, Robert Allen, Ayanna M. Howard, and Alan R. Wagner. 2016a. Overtrust of Robots in Emergency Evacuation Scenarios. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (Christchurch, New Zealand) (HRI '16). IEEE Press, 101--108.
[160]
Paul Robinette, Wenchen Li, Robert Allen, Ayanna M Howard, and Alan R Wagner. 2016b. Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI). IEEE, 101--108.
[161]
Maike AJ Roubroeks, Jaap RC Ham, and Cees JH Midden. 2010. The dominant robot: Threatening robots cause psychological reactance, especially when they have incongruent goals. In Persuasive Technology: 5th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2010, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 7--10, 2010. Proceedings 5. Springer, 174--184.
[162]
Bertrand Russell. 1938. Power: A new social analysis.
[163]
Martin Saerbeck and Christoph Bartneck. 2010. Perception of Affect Elicited by Robot Motion. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Osaka, Japan) (HRI '10). IEEE Press, 53--60.
[164]
Ghazal Saheb Jam, Jimin Rhim, and Angelica Lim. 2021. Developing a Data-Driven Categorical Taxonomy of Emotional Expressions in Real World Human Robot Interactions. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boulder, CO, USA) (HRI '21 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 479--483. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3447218
[165]
Yoichi Sakai, Yuuko Nonaka, Kiyoshi Yasuda, and Yukiko I. Nakano. 2012. Listener Agent for Elderly People with Dementia. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (HRI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 199--200. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157754
[166]
Maha Salem, Gabriella Lakatos, Farshid Amirabdollahian, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2015a. Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot? Effects of Error, Task Type and Personality on Human-Robot Cooperation and Trust. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Portland, Oregon, USA) (HRI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 141--148. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696497
[167]
Maha Salem, Gabriella Lakatos, Farshid Amirabdollahian, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2015b. Would you trust a (faulty) robot? Effects of error, task type and personality on human-robot cooperation and trust. In Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 141--148.
[168]
Maha Salem, Micheline Ziadee, and Majd Sakr. 2014. Marhaba, how may I help you? Effects of politeness and culture on robot acceptance and anthropomorphization. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. 74--81.
[169]
Nicole Salomons, Michael Van Der Linden, Sarah Strohkorb Sebo, and Brian Scassellati. 2018. Humans conform to robots: Disambiguating trust, truth, and conformity. In Proceedings of the 2018 acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction. 187--195.
[170]
Eduardo B Sandoval. 2019. Addiction to social robots: A research proposal. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 526--527.
[171]
Sarah Sebo, Brett Stoll, Brian Scassellati, and Malte F Jung. 2020. Robots in groups and teams: a literature review. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1--36.
[172]
Catherine E Sembroski, Marlena R Fraune, and Selma vS abanović. 2017. He said, she said, it said: Effects of robot group membership and human authority on people's willingness to follow their instructions. In 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 56--61.
[173]
Emmanuel Senft, Satoru Satake, and Takayuki Kanda. 2020. Would you mind me if i pass by you? socially-appropriate behaviour for an omni-based social robot in narrow environment. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 539--547.
[174]
Solace Shen, Petr Slovak, and Malte F Jung. 2018. " Stop. I See a Conflict Happening." A Robot Mediator for Young Children's Interpersonal Conflict Resolution. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 69--77.
[175]
Masahiro Shiomi, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. 2010. A larger audience, please!-Encouraging people to listen to a guide robot. In 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 31--38.
[176]
Toshiyuki Shiwa, Takayuki Kanda, Michita Imai, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. 2008. How quickly should communication robots respond?. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. 153--160.
[177]
Hung Sik and Ski Hung Ng. 1980. The social psychology of power. Number 21. Academic press.
[178]
Ashish Singh and James E. Young. 2012. Animal-Inspired Human-Robot Interaction: A Robotic Tail for Communicating State. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (HRI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 237--238. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157773
[179]
Gabriel Skantze. 2017. Predicting and regulating participation equality in human-robot conversations: Effects of age and gender. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. 196--204.
[180]
Heqiu Song, Zhiping Zhang, Emilia I Barakova, Jaap Ham, and Panos Markopoulos. 2020. Robot role design for implementing social facilitation theory in musical instruments practicing. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 253--260.
[181]
Maria Staudte and Matthew W Crocker. 2009. Visual attention in spoken human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. 77--84.
[182]
Angus Stevenson. 2010. Oxford dictionary of English. Oxford University Press, USA.
[183]
Megan Strait, Cody Canning, and Matthias Scheutz. 2014. Let me tell you! investigating the effects of robot communication strategies in advice-giving situations based on robot appearance, interaction modality and distance. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. 479--486.
[184]
Megan Strait, Florian Lier, Jasmin Bernotat, Sven Wachsmuth, Friederike Eyssel, Robert Goldstone, and Selma vS abanović. 2020. A three-site reproduction of the joint simon effect with the nao robot. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 103--111.
[185]
Megan K Strait, Cynthia Aguillon, Virginia Contreras, and Noemi Garcia. 2017. The public's perception of humanlike robots: Online social commentary reflects an appearance-based uncanny valley, a general fear of a "Technology Takeover", and the unabashed sexualization of female-gendered robots. In 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 1418--1423.
[186]
Sarah Strohkorb Sebo, Margaret Traeger, Malte Jung, and Brian Scassellati. 2018. The ripple effects of vulnerability: The effects of a robot's vulnerable behavior on trust in human-robot teams. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 178--186.
[187]
Yuan Sun and S Shyam Sundar. 2016. Psychological importance of human agency how self-assembly affects user experience of robots. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 189--196.
[188]
Leila Takayama, Wendy Ju, and Clifford Nass. 2008. Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: what everyday people think robots should do. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. 25--32.
[189]
Xiang Zhi Tan, Marynel Vázquez, Elizabeth J Carter, Cecilia G Morales, and Aaron Steinfeld. 2018. Inducing bystander interventions during robot abuse with social mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 169--177.
[190]
Fumihide Tanaka, Aaron Cicourel, and Javier R Movellan. 2007. Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 104, 46 (2007), 17954--17958.
[191]
Laetitia Tanqueray, Tobiaz Paulsson, Mengyu Zhong, Stefan Larsson, and Ginevra Castellano. 2022. Gender Fairness in Social Robotics: Exploring a Future Care of Peripartum Depression. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan) (HRI '22). IEEE Press, 598--607.
[192]
Benedict Tay, Younbo Jung, and Taezoon Park. 2014. When stereotypes meet robots: the double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human--robot interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 38 (2014), 75--84.
[193]
Angelique Taylor, Hee Rin Lee, Alyssa Kubota, and Laurel D Riek. 2019. Coordinating clinical teams: Using robots to empower nurses to stop the line. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--30.
[194]
Yunus Terzioug lu, Bilge Mutlu, and Erol cS ahin. 2020. Designing social cues for collaborative robots: the role of gaze and breathing in human-robot collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 343--357.
[195]
Raquel Thiessen, Minoo Dabiri, Denise Y. Geiskkovitch, Jacquie Ripat, and James Everett Young. 2023. Social Robots to Encourage Play for Children with Disabilities: Learning Perceived Requirements and Barriers from Family Units. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (HRI '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 625--628. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568294.3580161
[196]
Cristen Torrey, Susan R Fussell, and Sara Kiesler. 2013. How a robot should give advice. In 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 275--282.
[197]
Cristen Torrey, Aaron Powers, Matthew Marge, Susan R Fussell, and Sara Kiesler. 2006. Effects of adaptive robot dialogue on information exchange and social relations. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction. 126--133.
[198]
Tom R Tyler and E Allan Lind. 1992. A relational model of authority in groups. In Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 25. Elsevier, 115--191.
[199]
Guillaume Vailland, Yoren Gaffary, Louise Devigne, Valérie Gouranton, Bruno Arnaldi, and Marie Babel. 2020. Vestibular Feedback on a Virtual Reality Wheelchair Driving Simulator: A Pilot Study. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 171--179. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374825
[200]
Stephanie Valencia, Michal Luria, Amy Pavel, Jeffrey P Bigham, and Henny Admoni. 2021. Co-designing socially assistive sidekicks for motion-based aac. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 24--33.
[201]
Diede PM Van der Hoorn, Anouk Neerincx, and Maartje MA de Graaf. 2021. " I think you are doing a bad job!" The Effect of Blame Attribution by a Robot in Human-Robot Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 140--148.
[202]
Jonathan Vitale, Meg Tonkin, Sarita Herse, Suman Ojha, Jesse Clark, Mary-Anne Williams, Xun Wang, and William Judge. 2018. Be more transparent and users will like you: A robot privacy and user experience design experiment. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 379--387.
[203]
Lin Wang, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Vanessa Evers, Benjamin Krisper Robinson, and Pamela Hinds. 2010. When in Rome: the role of culture & context in adherence to robot recommendations. In 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 359--366.
[204]
Max Weber. 1948. From Max Weber: essays in sociology. Routledge.
[205]
Max Weber. 1978. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Vol. 2. University of California press.
[206]
Astrid Weiss, Judith Igelsböck, Manfred Tscheligi, Andrea Bauer, Kolja Kühnlenz, Dirk Wollherr, and Martin Buss. 2010. Robots asking for directions-The willingness of passers-by to support robots. In 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 23--30.
[207]
Ruchen Wen, Boyoung Kim, Elizabeth Phillips, Qin Zhu, and Tom Williams. 2021. Comparing Strategies for Robot Communication of Role-Grounded Moral Norms. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boulder, CO, USA) (HRI '21 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 323--327. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3447185
[208]
Mary-Anne Williams. 2021. Designing Human-Robot Interaction with Social Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Boulder, CO, USA) (HRI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3--4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434073.3444865
[209]
Tom Williams. 2024. Understanding Roboticists' Power through Matrix Guided Technology Power Analysis.
[210]
Tom Williams, Saurav Acharya, Stephanie Schreitter, and Matthias Scheutz. 2016. Situated Open World Reference Resolution for Human-Robot Dialogue. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (Christchurch, New Zealand) (HRI '16). IEEE Press, 311--318.
[211]
Katie Winkle, Séverin Lemaignan, Praminda Caleb-Solly, Ute Leonards, Ailie Turton, and Paul Bremner. 2019. Effective persuasion strategies for socially assistive robots. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 277--285.
[212]
Katie Winkle, Donald McMillan, Maria Arnelid, Katherine Harrison, Madeline Balaam, Ericka Johnson, and Iolanda Leite. 2023. Feminist human-robot interaction: Disentangling power, principles and practice for better, more ethical HRI. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 72--82.
[213]
Katie Winkle, Gaspar Isaac Melsión, Donald McMillan, and Iolanda Leite. 2021. Boosting robot credibility and challenging gender norms in responding to abusive behaviour: A case for feminist robots. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 29--37.
[214]
Yaqi Xie, Indu P Bodala, Desmond C Ong, David Hsu, and Harold Soh. 2019. Robot capability and intention in trust-based decisions across tasks. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 39--47.
[215]
Sachie Yamada, Takayuki Kanda, and Kanako Tomita. 2020. An escalating model of children's robot abuse. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 191--199.
[216]
Akiko Yamazaki, Keiichi Yamazaki, Takaya Ohyama, Yoshinori Kobayashi, and Yoshinori Kuno. 2012. A techno-sociological solution for designing a museum guide robot: regarding choosing an appropriate visitor. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 309--316.
[217]
X Jessie Yang, Vaibhav V Unhelkar, Kevin Li, and Julie A Shah. 2017. Evaluating effects of user experience and system transparency on trust in automation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 408--416.
[218]
Sangseok You and Lionel P Robert Jr. 2018. Human-robot similarity and willingness to work with a robotic co-worker. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 251--260.
[219]
James Young. 2021. Danger! This robot may be trying to manipulate you. Science Robotics, Vol. 6, 58 (2021), eabk3479.
[220]
James Young and Derek Cormier. 2014. Can robots be managers, too. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 2014, 4 (2014).
[221]
Cristina Zaga. 2017. Something in The Way It Moves and Beeps: Exploring Minimal Nonverbal Robot Behavior for Child-Robot Interaction. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Vienna, Austria) (HRI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 387--388. https://doi.org/10.1145/3029798.3034816
[222]
Xuan Zhao, Corey Cusimano, and Bertram F Malle. 2015. Do people spontaneously take a robot's visual perspective?. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts. 133--134.
[223]
Yi Zhao, Lian Loke, and Dagmar Reinhardt. 2022. Preliminary Explorations of Conceptual Design Tools for Students Learning to Design Human-Robot Interactions for the Case of Collaborative Drawing. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan) (HRI '22). IEEE Press, 1135--1139.
[224]
ShaI Zucker. 2020. Introducing a Robotic Arm For Remedial Teaching: The Impact of Motion Type on Robot-Student Interaction. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (HRI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 546--548. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3378275 io
Index Terms
- Power in Human-Robot Interaction
Recommendations
“Should I Follow the Human, or Follow the Robot?” — Robots in Power Can Have More Influence Than Humans on Decision-Making
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsArtificially intelligent (AI) agents such as robots are increasingly delegated power in work settings, yet it remains unclear how power functions in interactions with both humans and robots, especially when they directly compete for influence. Here we ...
Social Power in Human-Robot Interaction: Towards More Persuasive Robots
AAMAS '19: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent SystemsSocial power is defined as one's ability to influence another to do something which s/he would not do without the presence of such power. Different theories classify alternative ways to achieve social power, such as providing a reward, using coercion, ...
Storage modeling for power estimation
SYSTOR '09: Proceedings of SYSTOR 2009: The Israeli Experimental Systems ConferencePower consumption is a major issue in today's datacenters. Storage typically comprises a significant percentage of datacenter power. Thus, understanding, managing, and reducing storage power consumption is an essential aspect of any efforts that address ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
March 2024
982 pages
ISBN:9798400703225
DOI:10.1145/3610977
- General Chairs:
- Dan Grollman,
- Elizabeth Broadbent,
- Program Chairs:
- Wendy Ju,
- Harold Soh,
- Tom Williams
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 11 March 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
Conference
HRI '24: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 11 - 15, 2024
CO, Boulder, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 411Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)411
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)45
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in