Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

A Bounded Budget Network Creation Game

Published: 13 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

We introduce a network creation game in which each player (vertex) has a fixed budget to establish links to other players. In this model, each link has a unit price, and each agent tries to minimize its cost, which is either its eccentricity or its total distance to other players in the underlying (undirected) graph of the created network. Two versions of the game are studied: In the MAX version, the cost incurred to a vertex is the maximum distance between the vertex and other vertices, and, in the SUM version, the cost incurred to a vertex is the sum of distances between the vertex and other vertices. We prove that in both versions pure Nash equilibria exist, but the problem of finding the best response of a vertex is NP-hard. We take the social cost of the created network to be its diameter, and next we study the maximum possible diameter of an equilibrium graph with n vertices in various cases. When the sum of players’ budgets is n − 1, the equilibrium graphs are always trees, and we prove that their maximum diameter is Θ(n) and Θ(log n) in MAX and SUM versions, respectively. When each vertex has a unit budget (i.e., can establish a link to just one vertex), the diameter of any equilibrium graph in either version is Θ(1). We give examples of equilibrium graphs in the MAX version, such that all vertices have positive budgets and yet the diameter is Ω(√logn). This interesting (and perhaps counterintuitive) result shows that increasing the budgets may increase the diameter of equilibrium graphs and hence deteriorate the network structure. Then we prove that every equilibrium graph in the SUM version has diameter 2O(√logn). Finally, we show that if the budget of each player is at least k, then every equilibrium graph in the SUM version is k-connected or has a diameter smaller than 4.

References

[1]
Susanne Albers, Stefan Eilts, Eyal Even-Dar, Yishay Mansour, and Liam Roditty. 2006. On Nash equilibria for a network creation game. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’06). ACM, New York, 89--98.
[2]
Noga Alon, Erik D. Demaine, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, and Tom Leighton. 2013. Basic network creation games. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 27, 2 (2013), 656--668.
[3]
Xiaohui Bei, Wei Chen, Shang-Hua Teng, Jialin Zhang, and Jiajie Zhu. 2011. Bounded budget betweenness centrality game for strategic network formations. Theoretical Computer Science 412, 52 (Dec. 2011), 7147--7168.
[4]
Davide Bilò, Luciano Gualà, and Guido Proietti. 2012. Bounded-distance network creation games. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Internet and Network Economics (WINE’12). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 72--85.
[5]
Dietrich Braess, Anna Nagurney, and Tina Wakolbinger. 2005. On a paradox of traffic planning. Transportation Science 39, 4 (2005), 446--450.
[6]
Ulrik Brandes, Martin Hoefer, and Bobo Nick. 2008. Network creation games with disconnected equilibria. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE’08). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 394--401.
[7]
Michael Brautbar and Michael Kearns. 2011. A clustering coefficient network formation game. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT’11). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 224--235.
[8]
Nicos Christofides. 1976. Worst-case Analysis of a New Heuristic for the Travelling Salesman Problem. Technical Report CS-93-13. Carnegie Mellon University, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Pittsburgh, PA.
[9]
Jacomo Corbo and David Parkes. 2005. The price of selfish behavior in bilateral network formation. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC’05). ACM, New York, NY, 99--107.
[10]
Erik D. Demaine, Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi, Hamid Mahini, and Morteza Zadimoghaddam. 2007. The price of anarchy in network creation games. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed computing (PODC’07). ACM, New York, NY, 292--298.
[11]
Reinhard Diestel. 2005. Graph Theory (3rd ed.). Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 173. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
[12]
Alex Fabrikant, Ankur Luthra, Elitza Maneva, Christos H. Papadimitriou, and Scott Shenker. 2003. On a network creation game. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC’03). ACM, New York, NY, 347--351.
[13]
Michal Feldman, Kevin Lai, Ion Stoica, and John Chuang. 2004. Robust incentive techniques for peer-to-peer networks. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 102--111.
[14]
Philippe Golle, Kevin Leyton-Brown, Ilya Mironov, and Mark Lillibridge. 2001. Incentives for sharing in peer-to-peer networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Electronic Commerce (WELCOM’01). Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 75--87.
[15]
Wen Lian Hsu and George L. Nemhauser. 1979. Easy and hard bottleneck location problems. Discrete Applied Mathematics 1, 3 (1979), 209--215.
[16]
Matthew O. Jackson and Asher Wolinsky. 1996. A strategic model of social and economic networks. Journal of Economic Theory 71, 1 (1996), 44--74.
[17]
David S. Johnson, Maria Minkoff, and Steven Phillips. 2000. The prize collecting Steiner tree problem: Theory and practice. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’00). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 760--769.
[18]
Bernd Kawald and Pascal Lenzner. 2013. On dynamics in selfish network creation. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA’13). ACM, New York, NY, 83--92.
[19]
Elias Koutsoupias and Christos Papadimitriou. 1999. Worst-case equilibria. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS’99). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 404--413. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1764891.1764944
[20]
Nikolaos Laoutaris, Laura J. Poplawski, Rajmohan Rajaraman, Ravi Sundaram, and Shang-Hua Teng. 2008. Bounded budget connection (BBC) games or how to make friends and influence people, on a budget. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC’08). ACM, New York, NY, 165--174.
[21]
Jyh-Han Lin and Jeffrey Scott Vitter. 1992. ε-approximations with minimum packing constraint violation. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’92). ACM, New York, NY, 771--782.
[22]
Matúš Mihalák and Jan Christoph Schlegel. 2010. The price of anarchy in network creation games is (mostly) constant. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT’10). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 276--287.
[23]
Matúš Mihalák and Jan Christoph Schlegel. 2012. Asymmetric swap-equilibrium: A unifying equilibrium concept for network creation games. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS’12). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 693--704.
[24]
F. Sibel Salman, Joseph Cheriyan, Ramamoorthi Ravi, and Sairam Subramanian. 2000. Approximating the single-sink link-installation problem in network design. SIAM Journal on Optimization 11 (March 2000), 595--610. Issue 3.
[25]
Brian Skyrms and Robin Pemantle. 2000. A dynamic model of social network formation. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97, 16 (2000), 9340--9346.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)The Impact of Cooperation in Bilateral Network CreationProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3583668.3594588(321-331)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
  • (2023)On the PoA Conjecture: Trees versus Biconnected ComponentsSIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics10.1137/21M146642637:2(1030-1052)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2023
  • (2022)On Tree Equilibria in Max-Distance Network Creation GamesAlgorithmic Game Theory10.1007/978-3-031-15714-1_17(293-310)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Algorithms
ACM Transactions on Algorithms  Volume 11, Issue 4
June 2015
302 pages
ISSN:1549-6325
EISSN:1549-6333
DOI:10.1145/2756876
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 April 2015
Accepted: 01 December 2014
Revised: 01 November 2014
Received: 01 June 2012
Published in TALG Volume 11, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Braess’s paradox
  2. Nash equilibria
  3. eccentricity
  4. game theory
  5. network creation games
  6. network design
  7. price of anarchy

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 03 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)The Impact of Cooperation in Bilateral Network CreationProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3583668.3594588(321-331)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
  • (2023)On the PoA Conjecture: Trees versus Biconnected ComponentsSIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics10.1137/21M146642637:2(1030-1052)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2023
  • (2022)On Tree Equilibria in Max-Distance Network Creation GamesAlgorithmic Game Theory10.1007/978-3-031-15714-1_17(293-310)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
  • (2021)Network Creation Games with Traceroute-Based StrategiesAlgorithms10.3390/a1402003514:2(35)Online publication date: 26-Jan-2021
  • (2019)Distance-Uniform Graphs with Large DiameterSIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics10.1137/17M115791X33:2(994-1005)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2019
  • (2019)Geometric spanner gamesTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2019.07.020Online publication date: Jul-2019
  • (2018)On network formation games with heterogeneous players and basic network creation gamesTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2017.03.041717(62-72)Online publication date: Mar-2018
  • (2017)Efficient Best Response Computation for Strategic Network Formation Under AttackAlgorithmic Game Theory10.1007/978-3-319-66700-3_16(199-211)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2017
  • (2016)Celebrity gamesTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2016.08.005648:C(56-71)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2016
  • (2016)On Selfish Creation of Robust NetworksAlgorithmic Game Theory10.1007/978-3-662-53354-3_12(141-152)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media