A Comprehensive Survey for Deep-Learning-Based Abnormality Detection in Smart Grids with Multimodal Image Data
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Related Works on Abnormality Detection Based on Multimodal Image Data
- (i)
- To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey paper on abnormality detection in smart grids using multimodal image data, which can provide solution examples both in the air and over the air.
- (ii)
- This survey paper is formatted in a comprehensive manner so that interested readers can obtain a wide range of knowledge, which may help them in developing their own ideas in the research area of abnormality detection in smart grids.
- (iii)
- This survey compares both the methods and application scenarios so that interested readers will understand the cons and pros of the employed/compared methods or data quickly, further serving as a road map for academic researchers to start their own works and avoid duplication.
3. Abnormal Detection with Images over Short Distances
3.1. Visible Light
3.1.1. Self-Blast Glass Insulator Location
3.1.2. Icing Detection and Measurement
3.1.3. Vegetation Encroachment Monitoring
3.2. Infrared Image
3.2.1. Infrared-Image-Based Anomaly Detection for Low-Voltage Pulse Technology in Smart Grids
3.2.2. Infrared-Image-Based Anomaly Detection for Intelligent Sensor Technology in Smart Grids
3.2.3. Infrared-Image-Based Anomaly Detection for Internet of Things Technology in Smart Grids
4. Abnormality Detection with Images over Long Range
4.1. The Application of Satellites in Smart Grid Abnormality Detection
4.1.1. Satellite Positioning Theory
4.1.2. Optical Satellite Images
4.1.3. Synthetic Aperture Radar Images
4.2. Grid Anomaly Detection Based on Satellite Positioning
4.2.1. Intelligent Unmanned Inspection Systems
4.2.2. Tower Pole Monitoring and Settlement Detection
4.3. Grid Anomaly Detection Based on Optical Satellite Images
4.4. Grid Anomaly Detection Based on SAR Images
5. Methodologies
5.1. Abnormality Detection with Model-Driven Methods
5.2. Data-Driven Modeling for the Power System
5.3. Abnormality Detection with Deep Learning Methods
5.3.1. Supervised Learning
5.3.2. Semi-Supervised Learning
5.3.3. Unsupervised Learning
5.4. Discussion
6. Conclusions and Future Work
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhao, J.; Gómez-Expósito, A.; Netto, M.; Mili, L.; Abur, A.; Terzija, V.; Kamwa, I.; Pal, B.; Singh, A.K.; Qi, J.; et al. Power system dynamic state estimation: Motivations, definitions, methodologies, and future work. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2019, 34, 3188–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, C.; Shi, B.; Wu, X.; Sun, H. Advancing China? s smart grid: Phasor measurement units in a wide-area management system. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 2015, 13, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandola, V.; Banerjee, A.; Kumar, V. Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2009, 41, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milano, F.; Zárate-Miñano, R. A systematic method to model power systems as stochastic differential algebraic equations. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2013, 28, 4537–4544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bollen, M.H. Understanding power quality problems. In Voltage Sags and Interruptions; IEEE Press: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, L.; Chen, Y.; Kumar, P. Dimensionality reduction of synchrophasor data for early event detection: Linearized analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2014, 29, 2784–2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.; Chu, L.; Qiu, R.C.; Ai, Q.; Ling, Z.; Zhang, J. Invisible units detection and estimation based on random matrix theory. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2019, 35, 1846–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pinto, N.; Cruz, D.; Monteiro, J.; Cabrita, C.; Semião, J.; Cardoso, P.J.; Oliveira, L.M.; Rodrigues, J.M. IoE-Based Control and Monitoring of Electrical Grids: A Smart Grid’s Perspective. In Research Anthology on Smart Grid and Microgrid Development; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 843–868. [Google Scholar]
- Moeller, M.S. Monitoring powerline corridors with stereo satellite imagery. In Proceedings of the MAPPS/ASPRS Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, 6–10 November 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Shepard, D.P.; Bhatti, J.A.; Humphreys, T.E.; Fansler, A.A. Evaluation of smart grid and civilian UAV vulnerability to GPS spoofing attacks. In Proceedings of the 25th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2012), Nashville, TN, USA, 17–21 September 2012; pp. 3591–3605. [Google Scholar]
- Sivaneri, V.O.; Gross, J.N. Flight-testing of a cooperative UGV-to-UAV strategy for improved positioning in challenging GNSS environments. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2018, 82, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gazzea, M.; Pacevicius, M.; Dammann, D.O.; Sapronova, A.; Lunde, T.M.; Arghandeh, R. Automated Power Lines Vegetation Monitoring using High-Resolution Satellite Imagery. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2021, 37, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, T.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Gao, K. Ultra high voltage power tower SAR interferometry and icing tower testing results. In Proceedings of the 2019 6th Asia-Pacific Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar (APSAR), Xiamen, China, 26–29 November 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- He, H.; Zhou, L.; Lee, H. Ground Displacement Variation around Power Line Corridors on the Loess Plateau Estimated by Persistent Scatterer Interferometry. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 87908–87917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarighat, F.; Foroughnia, F.; Perissin, D. Monitoring of power towers’ movement using persistent scatterer SAR interferometry in south west of Tehran. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwarz, G.; Soccorsi, M.; Chaabouni-Chouayakh, H.; Espinoza, D.; Cerra, D.; Rodriguez, F.; Datcu, M. Automated information extraction from high resolution SAR images: TerraSAR-X interpretation applications. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Cape Town, South Africa, 12–17 July 2009; Volume 4, pp. 667–680. [Google Scholar]
- Sha, L.; Tao, L.; Mingzhou, W.; Ailing, H.; Wenhao, W.; Kan, X.; Yan, L. Study on extra-high voltage power line scatterers in time series SAR. In Proceedings of the 2014 Third International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications (EORSA), Changsha, China, 11–14 June 2014; pp. 47–51. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, L.; Wu, W.; Li, T. Power transmission tower monitoring technology based on TerraSAR-X products. In International Symposium on Lidar and Radar Mapping 2011: Technologies and Applications; International Society for Optics and Photonics: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2011; Volume 8286, p. 82861E. [Google Scholar]
- Mataloto, B.; Ferreira, J.C.; Cruz, N. LoBEMS—IoT for Building and Energy Management Systems. Electronics 2019, 8, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aslam, W.; Soban, M.; Akhtar, F.; Zaffar, N.A. Smart meters for industrial energy conservation and efficiency optimization in Pakistan: Scope, technology and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 44, 933–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, G.; Vale, Z.; Faria, P.; Gomes, L. BRICKS: Building’s reasoning for intelligent control knowledge-based system. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 52, 101832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ipakchi, A.; Albuyeh, F. Grid of the future. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 2009, 7, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khrennikov, A.Y.; Mazhurin, R.V.; Radin, P.S. Infra-red and ultraviolet control, LVI-testing, partial discharges and another diagnostic methods for detection of electrical equipment’s faults, defects. J. Multidiscip. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2014, 1, 184–189. [Google Scholar]
- Alam, M.K.; Khan, F.H.; Johnson, J.; Flicker, J. PV faults: Overview, modeling, prevention and detection techniques. In Proceedings of the IEEE 14th Workshop on Control and Modeling for Power Electronics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 23–26 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, X.; Zhang, K.; Liu, K.; Lin, X.; Dey, S.; Onori, S. Advanced Fault Diagnosis for Lithium-Ion Battery Systems: A Review of Fault Mechanisms, Fault Features, and Diagnosis Procedures. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2020, 14, 65–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smv, S.; Jeg, O.; Fja, C. Remote Monitoring of High-Voltage Disconnect Switches in Electrical Distribution Substations. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Istanbul, Turkey, 1–4 June 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Novák, M.; Biňas, M.; Jakab, F. Unobtrusive anomaly detection in presence of elderly in a smart-home environment. In Proceedings of the 2012 ELEKTRO, Rajecke Teplice, Slovakia, 21–22 May 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Howedi, A.; Lotfi, A.; Pourabdollah, A. Employing entropy measures to identify visitors in multi-occupancy environments. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2020, 13, 1093–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richter, J.; Wiede, C.; Kaden, S.; Weigert, M.; Hirtz, G. Skin Temperature Measurement based on Human Skeleton Extraction and Infra-red Thermography—An Application of Sensor Fusion Methods in the Field of Physical Training. In Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications, Porto, Portugal, 27 February–1 March 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Sonntag, D.; Zillner, S.; Smagt, P.V.D.; Lörincz, A. Overview of the CPS for Smart Factories Project: Deep Learning, Knowledge Acquisition, Anomaly Detection and Intelligent User Interfaces. In Industrial Internet of Things; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Ibrahim, M.; Alsheikh, A.; Awaysheh, F.M.; Alshehri, M.D. Machine Learning Schemes for Anomaly Detection in Solar Power Plants. Energies 2022, 15, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barman, B.K.; Yadav, S.N.; Kumar, S.; Gope, S. IOT Based Smart Energy Meter for Efficient Energy Utilization in Smart Grid. In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Power, Energy and Environment: Towards Smart Technology, Shillong, India, 1–2 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Baidya, S.; Potdar, V.; Ray, P.P.; Nandi, C. Reviewing the opportunities, challenges, and future directions for the digitalization of energy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 81, 102243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noorwali, A. Modelling and Analysis of Smart Grids for Critical Data Communication. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 2016; p. 444. [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez, V.G.; Pfeiffer, C.F.; Skeie, N.O. A Review of Smart House Analysis Methods for Assisting Older People Living Alone. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2017, 6, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Krishnamurthi, R.; Kumar, A.; Gopinathan, D.; Nayyar, A.; Qureshi, B. An Overview of IoT Sensor Data Processing, Fusion, and Analysis Techniques. Sensors 2020, 20, 6076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Habibzadeh, H.; Soyata, T.; Kantarci, B.; Boukerche, A.; Kaptan, C. Sensing, communication and security planes: A new challenge for a smart city system design. Comput. Netw. 2018, 144, 163–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatt, J.; Verma, H. Design and Development of Wired Building Automation Systems. Energy Build. 2015, 103, 396–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernstein, R.; Di Gesù, V. A combined analysis to extract objects in remote sensing images. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 1999, 20, 1407–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, J.M.; DeMarco, C.L. SVD-based voltage stability assessment from phasor measurement unit data. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2015, 31, 2557–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.E. A novel data-driven situation awareness approach for future grids—Using large random matrices for big data modeling. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 13855–13865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, X.; Qiu, R.; He, X.; Ling, Z.; Yang, H.; Chu, L. Early anomaly detection and localisation in distribution network: A data-driven approach. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2020, 14, 3814–3825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ling, Z.; Qiu, R.C.; He, X.; Chu, L. A new approach of exploiting self-adjoint matrix polynomials of large random matrices for anomaly detection and fault location. IEEE Trans. Big Data 2019, 7, 548–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yang, H.; Qiu, R.C.; Chu, L.; Mi, T.; Shi, X.; Liu, C.M. Improving power system state estimation based on matrix-level cleaning. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2020, 35, 3529–3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, S.; Qiu, C.; Zhang, D.; He, X.; Chu, L.; Yang, H. A deep learning approach for fault type identification of transmission line. Proc. CSEE 2019, 39, 65–74. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Z.; Xu, G.; Qi, Y.; Liu, N.; Zhang, T. Multi-patch deep features for power line insulator status classification from aerial images. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 24–29 July 2016; pp. 3187–3194. [Google Scholar]
- Jenssen, R.; Roverso, D. Automatic autonomous vision-based power line inspection: A review of current status and the potential role of deep learning. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2018, 99, 107–120. [Google Scholar]
- Terzija, V.; Valverde, G.; Cai, D.; Regulski, P.; Madani, V.; Fitch, J.; Skok, S.; Begovic, M.M.; Phadke, A. Wide-area monitoring, protection, and control of future electric power networks. Proc. IEEE 2010, 99, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.; Qiu, R.C.; Ai, Q.; Chu, L.; Xu, X.; Ling, Z. Designing for situation awareness of future power grids: An indicator system based on linear eigenvalue statistics of large random matrices. IEEE Access 2016, 4, 3557–3568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, L.; Qiu, R.; He, X.; Ling, Z.; Liu, Y. Massive streaming PMU data modelling and analytics in smart grid state evaluation based on multiple high-dimensional covariance test. IEEE Trans. Big Data 2017, 4, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, R.; Tian, W. Electric signature detection and analysis for power equipment failure monitoring in smart grid. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 17, 3739–3750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, R.; Sun, H.; Hatziargyriou, N.; Poor, H.V. (Eds.) Big data analysis of power grid from random matrix theory. In Chapter 7 of Smarter Energy: From Smart Metering to the Smart Grid; The Institution of Engineering and Technology: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, R.; He, X.; Chu, L.; Shi, X. Random Matrix Theory for Analyzing Spatio-Temporal Data. In Advanced Data Analytics for Power Systems; Tajer, A., Perlaza, S.M., Poor, H.V., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021; Volume 7. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, R.; Chu, L.; He, X.; Ling, Z.; Liu, H. (Eds.) Spatiotemporal Big Data Analysis for Smart Grids Based on Random Matrix Theory. In Transportation and Power Grid in Smart Cities: Communication Networks and Services; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 591–633. [Google Scholar]
- Tajer, A.; Perlaza, S.M.; Poor, H.V. Advanced Data Analytics for Power Systems; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Agrawal, S.; Agrawal, J. Survey on anomaly detection using data mining techniques. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015, 60, 708–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cook, A.A.; Mısırlı, G.; Fan, Z. Anomaly detection for IoT time-series data: A survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019, 7, 6481–6494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chalapathy, R.; Chawla, S. Deep learning for anomaly detection: A survey. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1901.03407. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandes, G.; Rodrigues, J.J.; Carvalho, L.F.; Al-Muhtadi, J.F.; Proença, M.L. A comprehensive survey on network anomaly detection. Telecommun. Syst. 2019, 70, 447–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, M.; Mahmood, A.N.; Hu, J. A survey of network anomaly detection techniques. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2016, 60, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ling, Z.; Qiu, R.C.; Jin, Z.; Zhang, Y.; He, X.; Liu, H.; Chu, L. An accurate and real-time self-blast glass insulator location method based on faster R-CNN and U-net with aerial images. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1801.05143. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Q.; An, J.; Lin, B. A texture segmentation algorithm based on PCA and global minimization active contour model for aerial insulator images. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2012, 5, 1509–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, H.; Zhai, Y.; Chen, R.; Wang, D.; Dong, Z.; Wang, Y. Self-shattering defect detection of glass insulators based on spatial features. Energies 2019, 12, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y. Automatic identification and location technology of glass insulator self-shattering. J. Electron. Imaging 2017, 26, 063014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reddy, M.J.B.; Mohanta, D. Condition monitoring of 11 kV distribution system insulators incorporating complex imagery using combined DOST-SVM approach. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2013, 20, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murthy, V.S.; Tarakanath, K.; Mohanta, D.; Gupta, S. Insulator condition analysis for overhead distribution lines using combined wavelet support vector machine (SVM). IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2010, 17, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murthy, V.S.; Gupta, S.; Mohanta, D. Digital image processing approach using combined wavelet hidden Markov model for well-being analysis of insulators. IET Image Process. 2011, 5, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ronneberger, O.; Fischer, P.; Brox, T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 234–241. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiao, H. Insulator identification and self-shattering detection based on mask region with convolutional neural network. J. Electron. Imaging 2019, 28, 053011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, X.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhang, H.; Xu, D. Detection of power line insulator defects using aerial images analyzed with convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2018, 50, 1486–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, Y.; Wang, G.; Yu, H.; Wei, G. Research on the application of the edge detection method for the UAVs icing monitoring of transmission lines. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), Takamatsu, Japan, 6–9 August 2017; pp. 1110–1114. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, Y.P.; Zuo, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, C. A new image-based algorithm for icing detection and icing thickness estimation for transmission lines. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW), San Jose, CA, USA, 15–19 July 2013; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, H.; Ma, X.; Zhao, L.; Du, H.; Luo, H.; Mao, X.; Tang, M.; Liu, Y. Transmission line icing measurement on photogrammetry method. In Proceedings of the MIPPR 2015: Remote Sensing Image Processing, Geographic Information Systems, and Other Applications, Enshi, China, 30 October–1 November 2015; Volume 9815, p. 98150Z. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, J.; Malik, A.S.; Abdullah, M.F.; Kamel, N.; Xia, L. A novel method for vegetation encroachment monitoring of transmission lines using a single 2D camera. Pattern Anal. Appl. 2015, 18, 419–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rong, S.; He, L.; Du, L.; Li, Z.; Yu, S. Intelligent Detection of Vegetation Encroachment of Power Lines with Advanced Stereovision. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2020, 36, 3477–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, A.; Shah, T.; Yousefhussien, M.; Pandey, A. Combining Remotely Sensed Imagery with Survival Models for Outage Risk Estimation of the Power Grid. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, TN, USA, 20–25 June 2021; pp. 1202–1211. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, S.; An, J. A robust insulator detection algorithm based on local features and spatial orders for aerial images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2014, 12, 963–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krizhevsky, A.; Sutskever, I.; Hinton, G.E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2012, 25, 1097–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Y. Road extraction by deep residual u-net. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2018, 15, 749–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McKinnon, C.; Carroll, J.; McDonald, A.; Koukoura, S.; Infield, D.; Soraghan, C. Comparison of new anomaly detection technique for wind turbine condition monitoring using gearbox SCADA data. Energies 2020, 13, 5152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Recherche, D.G. Vision and Strategy for Europe’s Electricity Networks of the Future: European Technology PlatformSmartGrids; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, Y.; Li, J.; Gao, D.W. Condition parameter modeling for anomaly detection in wind turbines. Energies 2014, 7, 3104–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alves, J.M.; Carreira, P.; Ferreira, H.; Pereira, H.; Cardoso, F. Smart Grids: Asset management in primary distribution substations, with smart sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution (CIRED 2013), Stockholm, Sweden, 10–13 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Moghe, R.; Iyer, A.; Lambert, F.C.; Divan, D. A robust smart sensor for smart substations. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 22–26 July 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Yerra, R.; Bharathi, A.K.; Rajalakshmi, P.; Desai, U.B. WSN based power monitoring in smart grids. In Proceedings of the 2011 Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, Adelaide, Australia, 6–9 December 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Zangl, H.; Bretterklieber, T.; Brasseur, G. A Feasibility Study on Autonomous Online Condition Monitoring of High-Voltage Overhead Power Lines. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2009, 58, 1789–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhuiyan, R.H.; Dougal, R.A.; Ali, M. A Miniature Energy Harvesting Device for Wireless Sensors in Electric Power System. IEEE Sens. J. 2010, 10, 1249–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roscoe, N.M.; Judd, M. Harvesting energy from magnetic fields to power condition monitoring sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 2013, 13, 2263–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, S.; Du, Y.; Sun, J.; Fang, Q.; Weng, Y.; Ma, L.; Zhang, X.; Wu, J.; Qin, Q.; Shi, Q. Research Status of Deformation and Inclination Detection of Transmission Towers. J. Telecom Power Technol. 2018, 35, 91–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, P.; Ji, F.; Wang, J.; Na, L. Design of High precision Acquisition System for Power Grid Data Based on Beidou J. Microcomput. Appl. 2019, 35, 58–61. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, Y.; Wang, W.; Pei, L.; Chen, X.; Song, B. The Research and Implementation Transmission Line Tower Rod and Monitoring System Using Reverse Network RTK Technology; Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 1894, p. 012044. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, Z.; Yu, W.; Song, B.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; Jin, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, M. Research on the Tower Pole Tilt Mechanism and Risk Assessment Technology Based on BeiDou reverse network RTK. In Proceedings of the E3S Web of Conferences, Changchun, China, 20–22 March 2020; Volume 165, p. 03011. [Google Scholar]
- Kobayashi, Y.; Karady, G.G.; Heydt, G.T.; Olsen, R.G. The utilization of satellite images to identify trees endangering transmission lines. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2009, 24, 1703–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, J.; Malik, A.S.; Xia, L. Vegetation monitoring for high-voltage transmission line corridors using satellite stereo images. In Proceedings of the 2011 National Postgraduate Conference, Perak, Malaysia, 19–20 September 2011; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, C.; Qin, R.; Huang, X.; Li, J. Individual tree detection from multi-view satellite images. In Proceedings of the IGARSS 2018—2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Valencia, Spain, 23–27 July 2018; pp. 3967–3970. [Google Scholar]
- Henderson, F.M.; Lewis, A.J. Principles and Applications of Imaging Radar. Manual of Remote Sensing: Volume 2; OSTI: Ridge, TN, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Y.H.; Liu, P. Adaptive Ship Detection for Single-Look Complex SAR Images Based on SVWIE-Noncircularity Decomposition. Sensors 2018, 18, 3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Groves, P.D. Principles of GNSS, inertial, and multisensor integrated navigation systems, [Book review]. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 2015, 30, 26–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, T.; Pei, L.; Xiang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Xia, S.; Tao, L.; Guan, X.; Yu, W. P3-LOAM: PPP/LiDAR Loosely Coupled SLAM With Accurate Covariance Estimation and Robust RAIM in Urban Canyon Environment. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 21, 6660–6671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, F.E. Fast and positive definite estimation of large covariance matrix for high-dimensional data analysis. IEEE Trans. Big Data 2019, 7, 603–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, X.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, C.; Wang, D. Real-time robust forecasting-aided state estimation of power system based on data-driven models. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 125, 106412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, L.; Wen, F.; Qiu, R.C. Eigen-inference precoding for coarsely quantized massive MU-MIMO system with imperfect CSI. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 68, 8729–8743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xue, Q.; Li, G.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, S.; Chen, Z.; Liu, Y. Fault diagnosis and abnormality detection of lithium-ion battery packs based on statistical distribution. J. Power Sources 2021, 482, 228964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srikanth, P.; Koley, C. Fuzzified time-frequency method for identification and localization of power system faults. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2021, 42, 1027–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, H.; Omitaomu, O.A.; Cao, Q.C. Machine Committee Framework for Power Grid Disturbances Analysis Using Synchrophasors Data. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omitaomu, O.A.; Niu, H. Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Smart Grid: A Survey. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 548–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bose, I.; Hossain, F.; Eldardiry, H.; Ahmad, S.; Biswas, N.K.; Bhatti, A.Z.; Lee, H.; Aziz, M.; Khan, M.S.K. Integrating Gravimetry Data With Thermal Infra-Red Data From Satellites to Improve Efficiency of Operational Irrigation Advisory in South Asia. Water Resour. Res. 2021, 57, e2020WR028654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Hoey, J.; Nugent, C.D.; Cook, D.J.; Yu, Z. Sensor-based activity recognition. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C 2012, 42, 790–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, S.; Chu, L.; Pei, L.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, W.; Qiu, R.C. Learning Disentangled Representation for Mixed-Reality Human Activity Recognition With a Single IMU Sensor. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 2514314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, F.; Pei, L.; Chu, L.; Zou, D.; Yu, W.; Zhu, Y.; Li, T. A deep learning method for complex human activity recognition using virtual wearable sensors. In International Conference on Spatial Data and Intelligence; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 12567, pp. 261–270. [Google Scholar]
- Pei, L.; Xia, S.; Chu, L.; Xiao, F.; Wu, Q.; Yu, W.; Qiu, R. MARS: Mixed Virtual and Real Wearable Sensors for Human Activity Recognition With Multidomain Deep Learning Model. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 9383–9396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Chu, L.; Xia, S.; Pei, L. Open Set Mixed-Reality Human Activity Recognition. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), Madrid, Spain, 7–11 December 2021; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Kiran, M.B. Significance of Intruder Detection Techniques in the Context of Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Singapore, 7–11 March 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Mikkilineni, A.K.; Dong, J.; Kuruganti, T.; Fugate, D. A novel occupancy detection solution using low-power IR-FPA based wireless occupancy sensor. Energy Build. 2019, 192, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mataloto, B.; Ferreira, J.C.; Cruz, N. Full IoT Lora School Building Management System. Preprints 2019, 2019050206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, M.; Hashmi, U.S.; Imran, A. Edge computing in smart health care systems: Review, challenges, and research directions. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2019, 33, e3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, L.; Pei, L.; Qiu, R. Ahed: A Heterogeneous-Domain Deep Learning Model for IoT-Enabled Smart Health With Few-Labeled EEG Data. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 16787–16800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhammad, G.; Hossain, M.S.; Kumar, N. EEG-based pathology detection for home health monitoring. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2020, 39, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shorten, C.; Khoshgoftaar, T.M. A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning. J. Big Data 2019, 6, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namozov, A.; Im Cho, Y. An efficient deep learning algorithm for fire and smoke detection with limited data. Adv. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2018, 18, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngiam, J.; Khosla, A.; Kim, M.; Nam, J.; Lee, H.; Ng, A.Y. Multimodal deep learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Bellevue, WA, USA, 28 June–2 July 2011. [Google Scholar]
Scenario | Objective | Technique Taxonomy | Technique | Literature |
---|---|---|---|---|
Self-blast glass insulator location | Locate and identify self-blast glass insulator | Classical methods | MSMF descriptor to extract features, k-means algorithm to generate visual vocabulary of insulator based on local features and spatial orders, coarse-to-fine matching strategy for identification | [61] |
Texture segmentation algorithm based on PCA and global minimization active contour model (GMAC) | [62] | |||
Deal with the defect detection problems of twin insulator strings | Segmented from complex backgrounds based on color features, self-shattering based on spatial features of connected regions | [63] | ||
Locate and identify self-blast glass insulator | Maximum interclass variance method (OTSU) for segmentation, local binary pattern histograms for self-blast detection | [64] | ||
SVM and discrete orthogonal S transform (DOST) | [65] | |||
Wavelets analysis and SVM | [66] | |||
Wavelets analysis combined with hidden Markov model (HMM) | [67] | |||
Deep learning methods | Orientation angle detection and binary shape prior knowledge (OAD-BSPK), AlexNet, and SVM | [46] | ||
Faster R-CNN and U-net | [68] | |||
Mask R-CNN | [69] | |||
Four-operation data augmentation method, cascaded CNN architecture | [70] | |||
Icing detection and measurement | Analyzed three kinds of edge detection methods | Classical methods | Canny operator, Sobel operator, and adaptive weighted Sobel operator | [71] |
Automatically detect icing and estimate ice thickness of the transmission lines | A scheme to improve edge detection accuracy | [72] | ||
Measured the distance and level angle of the ice | Photogrammetry method based on a laser range finder and inertial measurement unit (IMU) | [73] | ||
Vegetation encroachment monitoring | Locating the height of trees, distance between trees and poles, and distance between dangerous trees and HV lines outside ROWs | Classical methods | Uneven illumination filtering, Hough transform algorithm, motion tracking using 2D camera | [74] |
Detect the vegetation encroachment of transmission lines based on the image data monitored from towers with mounted binocular vision sensors | Deep learning methods | Faster R-CNN and Hough transform with advanced stereovision | [75] | |
Estimate vegetation profile within a buffer zone, outage risk estimation of the power grid | Residual U-Net based on GIS data, aerial and satellite imagery | [76] |
Method Category | Scenario of Anomaly Detection | Advantage | Shortcoming |
---|---|---|---|
Low-Voltage Pulse | Abnormal components of circuit | High precision, low energy consumption | Danger, sensitive to voltage fluctuations |
Intelligent Sensor | Conductor defect | High reliability high stability | High power consumption |
Internet of Things | Abnormal leakage of power grid system | Security, fast data processing | Low resolution |
Satellite Data Types | Commonly Used Anomaly Detection Areas | Related Work |
---|---|---|
Satellite positioning data | Tower pole tilt detection, ground settlement detection, inspection robot detection | [10,11,89,90,91,92] |
Optical satellite images | Vegetation monitoring | [9,12,39,93,94,95] |
Synthetic aperture radar images | Tower pole displacement detection, Ice-coated area detection | [13,14,15] |
Visible Light Data Resource | Advantages | Shortcomings |
---|---|---|
Ground patrol | High detection rate | Slow, tedious, dangerous for human, labor-intensive, impossible in extreme weather conditions and harsh terrains |
Fixed camera | Low maintenance | Limited observation range, complex deployment, high cost |
Climbing robot | High inspection accuracy | Slow, weight could damage the lines, hard to pass across various obstacles |
Helicopter | Fast inspection speed, wide observation range | High cost, safety issues |
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) | Automatic or human-controlled, real-time, safe, fly close to the detection target | Difficult for power line tracking and navigation |
Technique Used | References | Features |
---|---|---|
Convolutional neural network (CNN) | Supervised: [27,33] Semi-supervised: [20,35] | Ability to deal with large-scale data |
Recurrent neural network (RNN) Long short-term memory (LSTM) | Supervised: [19,28,29] Semi-supervised: [115] Unsupervised: [84,85] | Processing time series data |
AutoEncoder (AE) | Semi-supervised: [21,37] Unsupervised: [22,81,83] | Simple, ability to learn from unlabeled data |
Generative adversarial networks (GAN) | Semi-supervised: [30,38,86] Unsupervised: [87] | Generate plausible data to boost classifier |
Highlights | Disadvantages | Usage and Applicability | |
---|---|---|---|
Classical ML abnormality detection | (1) Data-driven; (2) Deterministic optimization strategy; (3) Performance may saturate with a large amount of data. | (1) High data/model error susceptibility; (2) Not robust to noisy data. | (1) Commonly used in lightweight devices; (2) Well-studied methods. |
DL-based abnormality detection | (1) Data-driven; (2) Scholastic gradient descent; (3) Data hungry; (4) Efficient inference with well-trained model. | (1) Data and label hungry; (2) High storage and computation requirement; (3) Model interpretability is needed. (4) Complex algorithm selection process; | (1) Mostly used in well-equipped platforms; (2) Widely studied, but not well studied. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhou, F.; Wen, G.; Ma, Y.; Geng, H.; Huang, R.; Pei, L.; Yu, W.; Chu, L.; Qiu, R. A Comprehensive Survey for Deep-Learning-Based Abnormality Detection in Smart Grids with Multimodal Image Data. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5336. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115336
Zhou F, Wen G, Ma Y, Geng H, Huang R, Pei L, Yu W, Chu L, Qiu R. A Comprehensive Survey for Deep-Learning-Based Abnormality Detection in Smart Grids with Multimodal Image Data. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(11):5336. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115336
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhou, Fangrong, Gang Wen, Yi Ma, Hao Geng, Ran Huang, Ling Pei, Wenxian Yu, Lei Chu, and Robert Qiu. 2022. "A Comprehensive Survey for Deep-Learning-Based Abnormality Detection in Smart Grids with Multimodal Image Data" Applied Sciences 12, no. 11: 5336. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115336