research-article

Open access

Designing robots with movement in mind

Authors:

Wendy JuAuthors Info & Claims

Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, Volume 3, Issue 1

Pages 91 - 122

https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.3.1.Hoffman

Published: 28 February 2014 Publication History

Abstract

This paper makes the case for designing interactive robots with their expressive movement in mind. As people are highly sensitive to physical movement and spatiotemporal affordances, well-designed robot motion can communicate, engage, and offer dynamic possibilities beyond the machines' surface appearance or pragmatic motion paths. We present techniques for movement centric design, including character animation sketches, video prototyping, interactive movement explorations, Wizard of Oz studies, and skeletal prototypes. To illustrate our design approach, we discuss four case studies: a social head for a robotic musician, a robotic speaker dock listening companion, a desktop telepresence robot, and a service robot performing assistive and communicative tasks. We then relate our approach to the design of non-anthropomorphic robots and robotic objects, a design strategy that could facilitate the feasibility of real-world human-robot interaction.

References

[1]

Adalgeirsson, S. O., & Breazeal, C. (2010). MeBot: A robotic platform for socially embodied telepresence. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 15--22), Osaka, Japan.

Digital Library

[2]

Akers, D. (2006). Wizard of Oz for participatory design: Inventing a gestural interface for 3D selection of neural pathway estimates. In Proceedings of CHI '06: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 454--459), Montreal, Canada.

Digital Library

[3]

Alami, R., Clodic, A., Montreuil, V., Sisbot, E. A., & Chatila, R. (2005). Task planning for human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on smart objects and ambient intelligence (SOC EUSAI) (pp. 81--85). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Digital Library

[4]

Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily Communication (2nd ed.). Methuen & Co, UK.

[5]

Aucouturier, J., Ogai, Y., & Ikegami, T. (2008). Making a robot dance to music using chaotic itinerancy in a network of Fitzhugh-Nagumo neurons. Neural Information Processing, 4985, pp. 647--656.

Digital Library

[6]

Baldwin, D. A., & Baird, J. A. (2001). Discerning intentions in dynamic human action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(4), 171--178.

[7]

Baron-Cohen, S. (1991). Precursors to a theory of mind: Understanding attention in others. In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural theories of mind (pp. 233--250). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Press.

[8]

Barrett, H. C., Todd, P. M., Miller, G. F., & Blythe, P. W. (2005). Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(4), 313--331.

[9]

Bates, J. (1994). The role of emotion in believable agents. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 122--125.

Digital Library

[10]

Blythe, P. W., Todd, P. M., & Miller, G. F. (1999). How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions. In Gigerenzer, G., and Todd, P. M. (eds), Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. Oxford University Press, New York.

[11]

Bohren, J., Rusu, R. B., Jones, E. G., Marder-Eppstein, E., Pantofaru, C., Wise, M., .., Holzer, S.(2011). Towards autonomous robotic butlers: Lessons learned with the PR2. In Proceedings from the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 5568--5575).

[12]

Breazeal, C., Brooks, A., Chilongo, D., Gray, J., Hoffman, G., Kidd, C., ... Lockerd, A. (2004). Working collaboratively with Humanoid Robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE RAS/RSJ International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids). Santa Monica, CA.

[13]

Breazeal, C., Wang, A., & Picard, R. (2007). Experiments with a robotic computer: Body, affect and cognition interactions. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 153--160). New York, NY: ACM.

Digital Library

[14]

Bretan, M., Cicconet, M., Nikolaidis, R., & Weinberg, G. (2012). Developing and Composing for a Robotic Musician Using Different Modes of Interaction. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC) (pp. 498--503), Ljubljana, Slovenia.

[15]

Chambers, J. (2011). Artificial Defense Mechanisms P. Antonelli (Ed.). New York, NY: The Museum of Modern Art.

[16]

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

[17]

Clark, H. H. (2005). Coordinating with each other in a material world. Discourse Studies, 7(4--5), 507--525. Dennett, D. C. (1987). Three kinds of intentional psychology. In The intentional Stance (chap. 3). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[18]

DiSalvo, C. F., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., & Kiesler, S. (2002). All robots are not created equal: The Design and Perception of Humanoid Robot Heads. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS) (pp. 321--326). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Digital Library

[19]

Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3--4), 177--190.

[20]

Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1(1), 49--98.

[21]

Fink, J. (2012). Anthropomorphism and human likeness in the design of robots and human-robot interaction. Social Robotics, 199--208.

Digital Library

[22]

Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

[23]

Gao, T., Newman, G. E., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). The psychophysics of chasing : A case study in the perception of animacy. Cognitive Psychology, 59(2), 154--179.

[24]

Gibson, J. J. (1977). The concept of affordances. Perceiving, acting, and knowing, 67--82, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.

[25]

Goldberg, K., & Kehoe, B. (2013, January). Cloud Robotics and Automation: A Survey of Related Work (Tech. Rep. No. UCB/EECS-2013-5). EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley.

[26]

Gray, J., Hoffman, G., Adalgeirsson, S. O., Berlin, M., & Breazeal, C. (2010). Expressive, interactive robots: Tools, techniques, and insights based on collaborations. In HRI 2010 Workshop: What Do Collaborations With the Arts Have to Say About HRI?

[27]

Hall, E. T. (1969). The hidden dimension. New York, NY: Anchor Books.

[28]

Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243--259.

[29]

Hendriks, B., Meerbeek, B., Boess, S., Pauws, S., & Sonneveld, M. (2011). Robot vacuum cleaner personality and behavior. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(2), 187--195.

[30]

Hoffman, G. (2005). HRI: Four Lessons from Acting Method (Tech. Rep.). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Media Laboratory.

[31]

Hoffman, G. (2012). Dumb robots, smart phones: A case study of music listening companionship. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Atlanta, Georgia.

[32]

Hoffman, G., & Breazeal, C. (2009). Effects of anticipatory perceptual simulation on practiced human-robot tasks. Autonomous Robots, 28(4), 403--423.

Digital Library

[33]

Hoffman, G., Kubat, R. R., & Breazeal, C. (2008). A hybrid control system for puppeterring a live robotic stage actor. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Munich, Germany.

[34]

Hoffman, G., & Vanunu, K. (2013). Effects of robotic companionship on music enjoyment and agent perception. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

Digital Library

[35]

Hoffman, G., & Weinberg, G. (2011). Interactive improvisation with a robotic marimba player. Autonomous Robots, 31(2--3), 133--153.

Digital Library

[36]

Höysniemi, J., Hämäläinen, P., & Turkki, L. (2004). Wizard of Oz prototyping of computer vision based action games for children. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Interaction Design and Children: Building a Community (pp. 27--34), College Park, Maryland.

Digital Library

[37]

Hudson, S., Fogarty, J., Atkeson, C., Avrahami, D., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., ... Yang, J. (2003). Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 257--264), Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.

Digital Library

[38]

Inhatowicz, E. (1970). Cybernetic Art. Available from http://www.senster.com/ihnatowicz/senster/. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14(2), 201--211.

[39]

Jones, C. (1965). The Dot and the Line. Available at http://vimeo.com/71888010

[40]

Ju, W., & Takayama, L. (2009). Approachability: How people interpret automatic door movement as gesture. International Journal of Design, 3(2), 1--10.

[41]

Kelley, J. F. (1983). An empirical methodology for writing user-friendly natural language computer applications. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 193--196), Boston, Massachuesetts.

Digital Library

[42]

Kim, J., Kwak, S., & Kim, M. (2009). Entertainment robot personality design based on basic factors on motions: A case study with Rolly. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, (RO-MAN) (pp. 803--808).

[43]

Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18(4), 513--549.

[44]

Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. (2002). Nonverbal communication in human interaction (5th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

[45]

Knight, H. (2011). Eight lessons learned about non-verbal interactions through robot theater. In Social robotics (pp. 42--51). Springer.

Digital Library

[46]

Kozima, H., Michalowski, M. P., & Nakagawa, C. (2009). Keepon: A playful robot for research, therapy, and entertainment. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 3--18.

[47]

Kozlowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception & Psychophysics, 21(6), 575--580.

[48]

Kraut, R. E. (1978). Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(4), 380.

[49]

Lasseter, J. (1986). Luxo Jr. Pixar Animation Studios. Pixar. Available from http://www.pixar.com/short_films/Theatrical-Shorts/Luxo-Jr.

[50]

Lasseter, J. (1987). Principles of traditional animation applied to 3D computer animation. Computer Graphics, 21(4), 35--44.

Digital Library

[51]

Lasseter, J. (2001). Tricks to animating characters with a computer. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 35(2), 45--47.

Digital Library

[52]

Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 210--20.

[53]

Malle, B., Moses, L., & Baldwin, D. (Eds.). (2001). Intentions and Intentionality. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

[54]

Maulsby, D., Greenberg, S., & Mander, R. (1993). Prototyping an intelligent agent through Wizard of Oz. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (INTERACT '93 & CHI '93) (pp. 277--284), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Digital Library

[55]

Meerbeek, B., Saerbeck, M., & Bartneck, C. (2009). Towards a design method for expressive robots. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), (pp. 277--278), San Diego, California.

Digital Library

[56]

Michalowski, M., Sabanovic, S., & Kozima, H. (2007). A Dancing Robot for Rhythmic Social Interaction. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 89--96). Arlington, VA.

Digital Library

[57]

Michotte, A. (1946). La perception de la causalité (Etudes Psychology, Vol. VI.).

[58]

Moore, N.-J., Hickson, M., & Stacks, D. W. (2010). Nonverbal communication: Studies and applications. London: Oxford University Press.

[59]

Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33--35.

[60]

Mumm, J., & Mutlu, B. (2011). Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)(p. 331). New York, NY: ACM Press.

Digital Library

[61]

Murphy, R., Shell, D., Guerin, A., Duncan, B., Fine, B., Pratt, K., & Sourntos, T. (2010). A Midsummer Nights Dream (With Flying Robots). Autonomous Robots, 30(2), 143--156.

Digital Library

[62]

Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., Han, J., Shin, N., Burke, J., & Kato, K. (2008). What people assume about humanoid and animal-type robots: Cross-cultural analysis between Japan, Korea, and the United States. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 5(1), 25--46.

[63]

Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38--43.

Digital Library

[64]

Paulos, E., & Canny, J. (1998). PRoP: Personal roving presence. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 296--303), Los Angeles, California.

Digital Library

[65]

Riek, L. D. (2012). Wizard of Oz studies in HRI: A systematic review and new reporting guidelines. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(1).

Digital Library

[66]

Santos, K. B. (2012). The Huggable: A socially assistive robot for pediatric care. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[67]

Scholl, B., & Tremoulet, P. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(8), 299--309.

[68]

Setapen, A. (2011). Shared Attention for Human-Robot Interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[69]

Sharma, M., Hildebrandt, D., Newman, G., Young, J. E., & Eskicioglu, R. (2013). Communicating affect via flight path Exploring use of the Laban Effort System for designing affective locomotion paths. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 293--300)

Digital Library

[70]

Sirkin, D., & Ju, W. (2012). Consistency in physical and on-screen action improves perceptions of telepresence robots. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

Digital Library

[71]

Takayama, L., Dooley, D., & Ju, W. (2011). Expressing thought: Improving robot readability with animation principles. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 69--76). ACM Press

Digital Library

[72]

Thomas, F., & Johnston, O. (1995). The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation (revised ed.). New York: Hyperion.

[73]

Thornton, I. M., Pinto, J., & Shiffrar, M. (1998). The visual perception of human locomotion. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 535--552.

[74]

Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural ecology of young childrens interactions with objects and artifacts. Ecological Approaches to Cognition: Essays in Honor of Ulric Neisser, 153--170.

[75]

Venolia, G., Tang, J., Cervantes, R., Bly, S., Robertson, G., Lee, B., & Inkpen, K. (2010). Embodied social proxy: Mediating interpersonal connection in hub-and-satellite teams. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1049--1058)

Digital Library

[76]

Vertelney, L. (1995). Using video to prototype user interfaces. In Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 142--146).

Digital Library

[77]

Weinberg, G., & Driscoll, S. (2007). The design of a perceptual and improvisational robotic marimba player. In Proceedings from the 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 769--774). Jeju, Korea: IEEE

[78]

Wistort, R., & Breazeal, C. (2011). TofuDraw: A mixed-reality choreography tool for authoring robot character performance. In Proceedings from the IDC Conference Idc (pp. 213--216)

Digital Library

[79]

Woods, S. N., Walters, M. L., Koay, K. L., & Dautenhahn, K. (2006). Methodological issues in HRI: A comparison of live and video-based methods in robot to human approach direction trials. In Robot and human interactive communication,. In Proceedings from the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 51--58).

[80]

Yankelovich, N., Simpson, N., Kaplan, J., & Provino, J. (2007). Porta-person: Telepresence for the connected conference room. In CHI'07: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2789--2794)

Digital Library

Cited By

Herdel VCauchard J(2024)Crafting for Emotion Appropriateness in Affective Robotics: Examining the Practicality of the OCC ModelProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36764938:MHCI(1-19)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3676493
Koike ACagiltay BMutlu B(2024)Tangible Scenography as a Holistic Design Method for Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661530(459-475)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661530
Lalioti VNakagaki KBhattacharya RKakehi YCiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)[e]Motion: Designing Expressive Movement in Robots and Actuated Tangible User InterfacesProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3634741(1-3)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623509.3634741
Show More Cited By

Designing robots with movement in mind
1. Computer systems organization
  1. Embedded and cyber-physical systems

Recommendations

Towards Designing Companion Robots with the End in Mind
HRI '23: Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

This paper presents an early-stage idea of using 'robot death' as an integral component of human-robot interaction design for companion robots. Reviewing previous discussions around the deaths of companion robots in real-life and popular culture contexts,...
Integrating Animation Artists into the Animation Design of Social Robots: An Open-Source Robot Animation Software
HRI '16: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction

Movements are an important part of robot design and we need dedicated tools to design them. As previous research has shown, 3D animation techniques are of great use to animate a robot. However, most robots don't benefit from an animation tool and ...
It’s Not Warm But That’s Okay: About Robots That Avoid Human Stereotypes
NordiCHI '22: Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference

Robot designs for social applications, such as care, often imitate human appearance and behavior. However, anthropomorphizing technology may reinforce connections between stereotypical characteristics and a robot’s assumed social category such as ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Human-Robot Interaction

Journal of Human-Robot Interaction Volume 3, Issue 1

Special Issue on Design in HRI: Past, Present, and Future

February 2014

139 pages

EISSN:2163-0364

Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Journal of Human-Robot Interaction Steering Committee

Publication History

Published: 28 February 2014

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Hasso Plattner Design Thinking Research Fund

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

22
Total Citations
View Citations
3,535
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)765
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)135

Reflects downloads up to 03 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Herdel VCauchard J(2024)Crafting for Emotion Appropriateness in Affective Robotics: Examining the Practicality of the OCC ModelProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36764938:MHCI(1-19)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3676493
Koike ACagiltay BMutlu B(2024)Tangible Scenography as a Holistic Design Method for Human-Robot InteractionProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661530(459-475)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661530
Lalioti VNakagaki KBhattacharya RKakehi YCiolfi LHogan TDöring TJenkins Tvan Dijk JHuron SLi ZCoyle DSigner B(2024)[e]Motion: Designing Expressive Movement in Robots and Actuated Tangible User InterfacesProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3634741(1-3)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3623509.3634741
Xu WHuff TYe SSanchez JRose DTung HTong YHatcher JKlein MMorales EGuo DHsu YPeng HAssadian ZRaiti JGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Virtual Reality-based Human-Robot Interaction for Remote Pick-and-Place TasksCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640748(1148-1152)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3640748
Cao JGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)How Robot Comes into Our Life in Urban Public Space: A Participatory StudyCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640638(292-296)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3640638
Kim HFischer MJeon JPyo SHonma KPennington MLiu HShimono KHiraoka TGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Design Exploration of Robotic In-car Accessories for Semi-autonomous VehiclesCompanion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610978.3640596(603-607)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610978.3640596
Mahadevan KChien JBrown NXu ZParada CXia FZeng ATakayama LSadigh DGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)Generative Expressive Robot Behaviors using Large Language ModelsProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634999(482-491)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634999
Chakravarthi Kumaran SBechor TErel HGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)A Social Approach for Autonomous Vehicles: A Robotic Object to Enhance Passengers' Sense of Safety and TrustProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634998(86-95)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634998
Chang XLi YLiu SMa LLc RGrollman DBroadbent EJu WSoh HWilliams T(2024)"Sorry to Keep You Waiting": Recovering from Negative Consequences Resulting from Service Robot Unintended RejectionProceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3610977.3634959(96-105)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610977.3634959
Pires GNero CLosik TCerqueira JAyanoğlu HDuarte E(2024)Exploring Empathetic Interactions: The Impact of Sound and Reactions in Human-Robot Relations Among University StudentsHuman-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-60412-6_2(19-28)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-60412-6_2
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents