This user may have left Wikipedia. BrendelSignature has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

I am currently very busy in real life. For the time, please be patient with any inquiries or requests for administrative action. Thank you.

Archives
November 2005 to January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 to May 2006 June 2006 to December 2006 January 2007 to May 2007 May 2007 to June 2007 June 2007 to August 2007 August 2007 to October 2007 Administrative requests archive Thank you section

Link to message templates for my own use.

Thank you notes and barnstars from other editors:

See the "Thank you" section for posts I really appreciate!

Welcome!

Hello Brendel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! HGB 08:31, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've been editing as an unregistered user for a long time. I've made improvements to hundreds of articles, corrected spelling and grammatical errors, and challanged POV for almost 2 years. I've never had any urge to register officially until I noticed your page, and your contributes. I then realised that I would like a record of what I've done, and perhaps a snappy, efficient user page like yours. I'm not 100% proficient in how to use this site, or it's opportunites, and think I might benefit from someone more experienced than I. Would consider helping me make a signature, and maybe even a small, non-complex user page? I've researched your contributes, and would be honored if you would assist me in becoming a more substantial contributor to this site. If not, or if you don't have time, I completely understand! I have a lack of time myself, thats probably why I've never registered. Just a thought I guess... Regards, smooth_operator, September 8

Signature ^brendel

This is my new Signature! Signature ^brendel 06:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like it! I do have a question about how you managed to post this nice signature each time you sign. Surely you don't write all of the code out each time? Nhprman 07:16, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And of course, I just did three seconds of research and discovered on my own that the "nickname" line in My Preferences does this just fine. Thanks! I'll be working on a nicer one, like yours. User:Nhprman ^UserLists 07:23, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm glad you like my new signature. Thanks. Signature ^brendel 07:35, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I've admired your work on Super Power for a few years. Anyways, I also liked your signature. Hope you don't mind, but I used your signature for a model when I created mine. :) Thanks! Digital ^Ninja 19:11, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind comment; you are more than welcome to use my signature as a model. Happy editing, Signature ^brendel 19:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

United States presidential elections

Hello. We worked together for a brief period of time on the United States article. I'm contacting you because, as someone interested in American politics, I would like your opinion. I'm currently taking issue with the format for the U.S. presidential elections pages. I'd appreciate if you participated in the discussion on the 2004 talk page. As the changes in question have occurred to all the election pages it's hard to centralize the discussion, so the most recent election page seems like the best place to start. Here's my comment, thanks! SpiderMMB 04:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Winner/Runner-up

I have to voice my concern that this format is hurting the article. I will post this on a few notable election pages and hope that it's noticed. I have to admire the determination of whoever came up with this idea (it's apparently on every page) but ultimately, I think it should go. I think that having "winner/runner-up" displayed so prominently in the infobox overshadows the importance of the election. Some of these elections were not mere contests, but were epic events in American history where a variety of important viewpoints were symbolically represented and voted upon. Just in the last 50 years, the notable political climates of 1968 and 2004 came to a boiling point around election time. We should not be placing so much emphasis on the "winner" and the "runner-up" -- this is not a spelling bee. If we condense this into who "won" we are doing a disservice to the issues that drove these elections. SpiderMMB 23:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the update, but I am not able to devote as much time to WP as normal right now. Signature ^brendel 06:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibreak

I have been busy for a while and will be on a wikibreak for a week. I will likely not, however, be able to return to normal editing levels until early next year. Until then I will check my watchlist from time to time and undertake routine administrative tasks, i.e. Page Protection & some 3RR vios (3RR requires daily checking in case there's a dispute). Signature ^brendel 06:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The mods are on a crusade against your map Sir.

Personally I feel the Map you created on White Americans brings a lot of easily understandable and quick information for any reader on the subject. The mods however have decided to remove your map giving all manner of false reasons for doing so. I think they mean to convolute the subject so that it is not so easily understood for political reasons. I would like to request that you ask them to stop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:934C:3900:60D9:3C3:631E:1096 (talk) 21:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I need help....

I need help deleting my account or at least making it so that my name doesn't show up when I type my name in a google or yahoo search. I really value my privacy and had I known your name shows up in those sorts of searches I would never had signed up. Can you please help me? I would really appreciate it if you can do something to help, thanks. Daniel Chiswick 12:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Thomas Beauchamp controversy

Thank you for your assistance. — Steven Andrew Miller (talk) 06:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Prestige cars copy.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Prestige cars copy.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:GDP welfare.png

Thanks for uploading Image:GDP welfare.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 06:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding block of User:Eng rashid

The article this editor was accused of vandalizing was one that this apparent new editor had created and is the primary contributor of (Grid fabric). I tried leaving a comment in AIV (diff), but perhaps I was too late. I've left a welcome message on this editor's page in hopes that his editing practices don't trigger an anti-vandal bot in the future. --健次(derumi)^talk 08:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I too am concerned about this, as VoABot's setting mean it is warning users too easily. ~~I have~~ Another admin has unblocked the user as they seem like a new editor who was just unsure about editing and image tagging. If there is any other reason that you blocked them, please contact me or User:Neil. ELIMINATORJR 15:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see your point - I will also rember to be more suspicious of VoABot's warnings. Regards, Signature ^brendel 18:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Venn cars copy.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Venn cars copy.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Red Terror

when protecting pages please don't forget to tag them accordingly. `'Míkka >t 01:12, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It tells you whether or not a page is protecting when editing. Is it really neccessary to put a big, distracting tag on the top. I suppose that reveals my bias on tags ;-) Regards, Signature ^brendel 04:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Anglo-Saxon economy

An article that you have been involved in editing, Anglo-Saxon economy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anglo-Saxon economy. Thank you. Pastordavid 17:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your vote on the New Zealand dream, it really helped. Sorry to take a different view on the Anglo-Saxon economy, however when I was living in Switzerland I was frequently confronted by these stereotypes. I am a New Zealander and our country is not part of the United States, but to my colleagues I was an Anglo-Saxon. They made no distinction between the two countries. If President Bush did something, they would come to me and say "look what your president is doing".

Europe has economic troubles and they are constantly debating how to fix the problems, usually the reformists favor the neo-liberal Anglo-Saxon modelBadenoch 22:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, reasonable people can disagree - I do not hear the term commonly used, but perhaps that's becuase I'm in the U.S. By American standards, however, Canada and the UK is "to the left" in terms of economics, i.e. unviersal health care, etc... Social liberals in the U.S. often refer to Canada as an example can having a bigger well-fare state does not neccesarily inhibit economic growth. Talking about an Anglo-Saxon economy is too much of an over-simplification IMHO - which is why, I assume, I do not hear the term much in the U.S. Anyways, you do great work and I appreciate your continous efforts on the household income template! Regards, Signature ^brendel 02:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Anglo-Saxon country completely fits their Anglo-Saxon stereotype. The Anglo-Saxon policies they discuss don't normally include the US health care system, which is generally understood to be the most expensive and least effective in the OECD [1]. Europeans are more interested in America's strengths. Often the Anglo-Saxon policies that they are interested in relate to free-market competition and labor laws. In terms of free-trade they normally use Australia and New Zealand as examples of advanced free-trading countries because America is more protectionist (less economically liberal). Badenoch 06:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know about our health care sytem's abysmal preformance - something many liberals here point to as proof that the free market has limits. Nonetheless, my problem with the term as you have pointed out is that it is is a "stereotype" which leads to me to question how many European economists actually use the term in their dicussions and publications - in the U.S. it is rarely used. From you are telling me the term is used by continental Europeans (economists?) to cherry-pick economic policies of the rather heterogenous English-speaking countries they beleive ought to be part of economic reforms. You have given something to think about, though... I will think about deletion vote once more. Regards, Signature ^brendel 10:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Income news item

I thought the following income article may be of interest to you.[2] Regards Badenoch (talk) 06:34, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:USA Award

I have updated the award on the WP:USA talk page if you want to take a look and see how its turned out and feel free to tell me when you wan it put on the project permanantly, cheers (♠Taifarious1♠) 01:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MORI poll entries on UK newspapers

Hi, I notice you've added this info. to a number of UK newspapers with a number of errors. I've corrected the entry for The Times as an example - [3]. Please can you correct, and for balance, I'd recommend including the 3 main parties in each case. Thanks -- John (Daytona2 · talk) 18:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought I had included all three parties in each entry. As for the mistakes, tyicall INTJ, big picture oriented w/o much regard for details. Signature ^brendel 05:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:SF Left-Wing

Happy New Year to you too! I know you are not a wildly left-wing socialist/communist person. Don't get me wrong you are obviously liberal politically just as I am obviously conservative in most ways. You are a very nice, reasonable, and intelligent person and have given me a new found respect for liberals every where. I always respect and consider your opinions, and as you know, you've even taught me a thing or two about several things in the past. My recent edits have nothing to do with you.

You as an individual do not represent ALL of San Francisco's political views however. Left-wing as I use it in the "San Francisco values" article is not supposed to be used in a negative way, I just think the page in which it links to better describes San Francisco's political views than simply "liberal" or "progressive"; I think it's a broader term. Just reading the left-wing article from top to bottom I think describes San Francisco's political views very well. Read the article and tell me if you agree. Needless to say, it is common knowledge that San Francisco is also quite possibly the most liberal area of the United States. In addition to all this, the word "right-wing" is used numerous times in numerous articles in Wikipedia. I as a conservative think it is being used in a pejorative way but I also think it is the best word to use.--Lucky Mitch (talk) 21:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why would San Francisco be so "left-wing"? Maybe because it doesn't have much of a "classical" but creditable Hard Right. With its ethnic and religious diversity it would be a miserable place for a white racist or a religious bigot of any kind. A strong LGBT community would likely drive off homophobes. San Francisco has -- urban as it is -- no landed aristocracy and no romanticization of one that no longer exists (contrast the American South). Educational standards are high, so blatant superstition is rare. For its size, San Francisco has plenty of cultural opportunities.

But it's also a good place for fostering optimism. One is never far from a nice view -- contrast some place so bland in view as Dallas, Houston, or Indianapolis, where nobody can have a good view of anything. The climate is chilly but surprisingly sunny; the famous fog usually is a night-time phenomenon. It's just moist enough for beautiful foliage. Sure, there's rain; when it rains, it pours. The rain comes swiftly and disappears fast, unlike in Seattle. Snow? Heat waves? Both are common in Chicago in the expected seasons, but not in San Francisco.

The chilly climate is just cool enough to preclude the tacky display of flesh that one expects in... Florida. It's just too cold for tank tops or hot pants on women -- or short-sleeve shirts. It's a difficult place in which to get a suntan with early wrinkles. It's warm enough even in the winter that one need not wear one of the fashion disasters known as the overcoat. A suit and tie won't overheat one, and it is adequate. So it is with a sweater and jeans. Add to this, the mountainous terrain requires people to get fit and stay fit. Every walk is a hike... and think what that does to human physiques. I've been other places, and I see fewer obese people in San Francisco than anywhere else, even if the restaurants are great. It's also among the least car-friendly places in America.

People seem to look better in San Francisco, on the whole, than almost anywhere else for the same age, ethnicity, gender, or even social class.

All of that, I think, fosters optimism. Even if one is a conservative, one tends to lose one's grouchiness so that one's conservatism is restricted to supporting classical standards in culture and competition in economics.

"San Francisco values"? It's really a slap at a city for having so many LGBT people and so few fundamentalist Christians. That people like Reverend Pat Robertson depict it as a sort of Sodom and Gomorrah which God might strike at any time with "The Big One" should recognize that a place where people must get along with people who don't look like them, don't pray like them, have wildly dissimilar names, or have different economic backgrounds look the other way about something like homosexuality. San Francisco has been a place of diversity from the time that the 'Forty-Niners' got there -- and I'm not discussing the football team. --Paul from Michigan (talk) 03:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

US culture/society

Replied on my talk page. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Balham station

Thanks for the protection. Could i ask for the page to be reverted to the disambiguation page until this merge is sorted?

Secondly, your rfa promotion picture is blocking out the toc on your userpage. Simply south (talk) 11:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Attachement Europe.png

Do you have a source for Image:Attachement Europe.png? - $\mathrm {S}$ $\mathrm {Solberg}$ $\mathrm {J}$ 22:48, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, the 2005 Eurobarometer survey as found on the Pan European Identity article. Regards, Signature ^brendel 00:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC07505.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC07505.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:User Monterey County

A tag has been placed on Template:User Monterey County requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Median household income

Hi Brendel,

A problem has arisen with Figure 2 in median household income. Kelvinc wants it deleted as OR [4]. As you are the original creator of the graph I thought you may be interested.

Kelvinc is a self described cultural absolutist, a Chinese Candian into Anglo-spherism and Sino-spherism. He also has a history of trouble making[5]. His first ojection was to brain drain where he was concerned with Europhobes, having made no progress with that he moved to New Zealand dream, and then median household income in Australia and New Zealand. Yesterday he raised objections to median household income.

Thus far he has no other support from anyone.

I don't know the best way to deal with him. Should I ignore him or give into his wishes. If I give in to his wishes, he may be happy, but then again he may want delete other things, such as Template:International median household income, which is used in many places on the wikipedia.

As you have more experience than me, I was hoping that you may might be able to offer advice.Badenoch (talk) 00:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, BrendelSignature! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 22:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Int. Median Household Income

Hey Brendel, I found this excellent source of information known as the Luxembourg Income Survey which happens to collect data on equivalent median household income on all countries. Yes, they have many countries we can use. All you have to do is post the data on the "international comparisons" section of US household income article. Speaking of which, the PPP rates you use are outdated. According to the latest World Bank/OECD/IMF report (as of this year they will standardize PPP indices), the PPP rate for the UK is .65 and not .618.

Here is the link for you to work on household income:

http://www.lisproject.org/keyfigures/full_kf.xls

The info. is on where it says median equivalised income. In reality it means household income which is equivalised.

Here is more info:

http://www.lisproject.org/keyfigures/methods.htm

The LIS is a very well known org., which the Census has worked with.

By the way, this Swiss M.H.Income data should not be there, because it does not include renters, which obviously pushes the median much higher, because renters tend to be much lower on the income scale.

If you can email me with a response, that would be great: fonseca33@aol.com

Many Thanks,

Forest.

Nicholas Barr

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nicholas Barr, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://econ.lse.ac.uk/staff/nb/index_own.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:55, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poke

Hey, are you online right now? Khoi khoi 05:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you aren't online. I just wanted to notify you that I've change the protection level to semi on Karmapa controversy, because the user who started the conflict in the first place has been blocked as a sockpuppet of a banned user. However, it should probably stay at semi for awhile in case he/she tries to come back. Ciao. Khoi khoi 06:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of United States

An editor has nominated United States, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for noticing. Happy April Fools. Useight (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New voter registration stats

FYI The Ballot Access News updated stats (for the states that have party registration, anyway) is now online. Settler (talk) 05:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Signature ^brendel 00:01, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Income/Education graph

Hey BrendelSignature, I created a graph of education vs. income for personal income, which is similar to your household income graph. Since you're the arbiter of every income demographics page on wikipedia, I thought I'd show it to you. Feel free to do whatever you like with it, or ignore it too. Thanks :) --Lalala666 (talk) 03:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great graph, I will incorporate in many of the articles soon. Great job! Signature ^brendel 03:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Brendel, in January of 2006, you uploaded various photos of sculptures. I hope you've stopped doing this: the copyright issues for photos of sculptures are... tricky, and we've already received one complaint. DS (talk) 18:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know that there were copyright issues with uploading pictures of sculptures, since the law states that one is free to take photographs of any structure so long as one is standing on public land. But I haven't uploaded any more sculputre pics since, anyways. Signature ^brendel 06:17, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fuel economy

The discussion about fuel economy is being reopened on Infobox Automobile. You had an opinion once, are you still of the same mind? Skyemoor (talk) 01:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit breaking ref's

Hi, I notice that you have made an edit to Welfare state where you added a table and some references, however the references don't look right and they made some big red warnings come up down in the "References" section. I reverted your edits temporarily, just so we can fix the referencing issue. It's no big deal, it's a minor pain that when you preview your edit, you can't see what's happening down in the section where the ref's show up, and I've broken a few myself. I'll be glad to help you get the <ref> tags to work right, and as I say, I'm not reverting your addition of content. Let me know if I can help! Franamax (talk) 06:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Kemp

You are amontg those who has edited supply-side economics at least 20 times and at least once this year. You may want to participate at Wikipedia:Peer_review/Jack_Kemp/archive1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi from Badenoch

Who do you think will be the next president? Do you have a favorite yet? Badenoch (talk) 06:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I was in favor of either Obama or Hillary; but since the "gas tax holiday" idea supported by Clinton and rather casual dismissal of expert opinion have me rooting for Obama. Considering the mood in the country as of now, I would say that my pick has the best chances as well. Signature ^brendel 21:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Once I'm not as busy, I'll revist the income article series, I saw your comment on Household income in the United States, but didn't have time to respond or edit the article yet. Regards, Signature ^brendel 21:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Moyers RfC

Hi, given your political stance, I wonder if you have a moment to give some input on an issue please. I respect your opinion so I'm asking you to shed light on the issues. There is a dispute and RfC at Bill Moyers about weight given to an issue. The RfC section is here. Hope you can make a comment. Thanks. ► RATEL ◄ 10:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I need to complain about the threats and inexplicable arch-hostile behaviour of user LUCPOL towards me:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:81.106.128.119 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.106.128.119 (talk) 10:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Modern liberal American magazines

I have nominated Category:Modern liberal American magazines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Loonymonkey (talk) 23:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Lincoln 1970

Template:Lincoln 1970 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Vossanova ^o< 14:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GDP welfare.png and HDI welfare.png

I believe that the use of these two images in the article Welfare state violates Wikipedia's policy on using original research or unverified claims. The original source for the data did not show any correlation or least squares fit or residuals or any formula describing the relation of that data. The source just gave numbers. When you included a "correlation," you included original research and unverified claims. You indicated this by categorizing those images as "Self-published work" when you uploaded them. There's nothing wrong with that... until you included them as figures in the Welfare state article.

If you would, please, re-upload them with only the well-sourced data points. They'd be nice to include in that article if only it wasn't for the deceiving "correlation."

I think the linear relationship you graphed over the data points is seriously flawed. The residuals from fitting a linear function to that data are so high as to make the correlation dubious at best. That's putting it really nice. The questionable nature of those images (having not been peer-reviewed) is exactly why articles shouldn't contain original research.--Bodybagger (talk) 06:27, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite. The numbers are the correlation. I did not have to run any calculations or form any original hypothesis. I simply graphed the numbers, that's not OR. If I have numbers 1, 7, 9, 13, 21 in column A and numbers 2, 9, 15, 21 in column B, and I to display these statistics on Wikipedia in graphic form and state that they there is a positive correlation, I am not conducting original research, but am simply describing the data. I am not conducting research but simply stating that as numbers in column A go up, so do those in column B. By labeling the graph as "self-published work" I meant that I created the graph myself rather than having downloaded it from somewhere else. That's not OR, I simply decided to put the stats in graphic form rahter than in a table. Signature ^brendel 07:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

American middle class GA Sweeps Review: On Hold

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria and I'm specifically going over all of the "Culture and Society" articles. I have reviewed American middle class and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In reviewing the article, I have found there are several issues that need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left this message on your talk page since you have significantly edited the article (based on using this article history tool). Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix with the assistance of multiple editors. I have also left messages on the talk pages of a few related WikiProjects to spread the workload around some. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 16:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have also reviewed Social class in the United States and it has a few issues that need to be addressed. I will also leave it on hold for a week for you and other editors to make the suggested changes. Since you're working on two articles, if you need more time, please contact me on my talk page. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 05:29, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject: Power in international relations

Hey, as a member of Wikipedia: WikiProject Power in international relations, I'd like to invite you to come back and work on the project. There's still a lot of work to be done and we'd all appreciate your contributions. Please come back. --Hobie (talk) 02:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Introducing WikiProject United States Government...

Hello BrendelSignature,

Are you interested in Politics, Law or the United States? Do you enjoy expanding, creating or maintaining articles relating to those subjects? Or do you enjoy the small stuff? Or maybe you like learning about the United States Congress or the Commander in Chief.

Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying.

Thanks in advance, « Diligent Terrier Bot (talk) 21:23, 3 August 2008 (UTC) [reply]

This message has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot on behalf of WikiProject United States Government.
You have received it because you are a member of a related WikiProject or you have said you are interested in your userspace.
Message written by Leonard^Bloom and Diligent Terrier.

Help us get the project off the ground and flying.

Request for source

Hi, you added a section to Political parties in the United States here: [6] It had been deleted but I replaced it, see article talk for info on that. However, I just realized that the source is broken, and after going over the history I found that it was broken from the beginning. Would you please dig up that "Bartels" source and add it? Because I'd like the section to remain. Thanks! --71.241.217.171 (talk) 23:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I got it! --71.241.217.171 (talk) 04:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:White Americans.png data source?

Hi, I'd like to know the source of the data used for Image:White Americans.png. I'm trying to recreate it in SVG form. Tadpole9^{(talk • contribs)} 06:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:America Class.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:America Class.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:57, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:DSC03957.JPG

Image:DSC03957.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Delitzsch tenement.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Delitzsch tenement.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:23, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC05182.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Northridge Mall.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC04575.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Modern art display.JPG. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Downtown Salinas.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Downtown Salinas.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:28, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santa Cruz Victorian.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Santa Cruz Victorian.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick Question from a Young Grasshopper

Brendel, you don't know me, but I've followed a few of your pages and respect both your edits and experience. I need someone as a mentor. The question is:whether or not to ask an editor to add information that links to a page to which I contributed significantly? The page I helped author is about reactions to the KORUS FTA in South Korea, I think it's indirectly related the KORUS FTA article proper. RlndGunslinger (talk) 14:33, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Class Thompson Hickey copy.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Class Thompson Hickey copy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crime International.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Crime International.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Fredrick

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Paul Fredrick, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:NN company

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Toddst1 (talk) 07:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salinas Income copy.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Salinas Income copy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 21:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Salinas_City_Seal.gif

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Salinas_City_Seal.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 09:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Median household income

While doing research into the economy of Scotland, I quickly checked this page (which I believe you have contributed heavily to) for a comparison and because I noticed it had the OECD PPP factors. I found that many of the years are a little out of date and there is probably more up to date information available now to update this. I have been using "Scottish Economic Statistics 2008", published by the Scottish Government, I believe the data in this is from 2007. I am not sure if there will have been much change comparatively between countries median household incomes, but thought you might be interested? Benson85 (talk) 01:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Automobile ownership

I have nominated Automobile ownership, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automobile ownership (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Zunaid 21:36, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Bourgeois personality

I have nominated Bourgeois personality, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bourgeois personality. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jamesofur (talk) 04:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Household income in the United States GAR notice

Household income in the United States has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 15:31, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Northern United States

An article that you have been involved in editing, Northern United States, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern United States. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hoppingalong (talk) 19:08, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Income equality GAR

Letting you know I've opened a GAR for Income inequality in the United States. You can view it here. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coastal California

I have promoted your article to a top priority on the California WikiProject. I intend to expand its focus to include geography as well as politics. Purplebackpack89 (talk) 18:37, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Crime in the United States

Could I possibly direct you to my question regarding state-by-state articles at the bottom of the above talk page. Cheers. SGGH ^ping! 14:44, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Personal income 06.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Personal income 06.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 08:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Files listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 December 31 if you are interested in preserving them. Thank you. — Bility (talk) 23:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lethbridge Undergraduate Research Journal

The article Lethbridge Undergraduate Research Journal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Lethbridge Undergraduate Research Journal – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 10:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:UBX/DeportationNativists

Hello BrendelSignature, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, User:UBX/DeportationNativists, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:WOSlinker. This has been done because the page is a very short article providing no content to the reader (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:WOSlinker. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of WOSlinker (talk · contribs) 12:14, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of University of California, Santa Cruz

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:University of California, Santa Cruz/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Race Income.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Race Income.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:55, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Sociology Newsletter: II (April 2010)

Sociology Project • News • April 2010
The Sociology WikiProject is conducting a roll call (or min-census, if you prefer). More then five years down the road, we have over 50 members, but we don't know how many of them are still active in the sociology area. If you are or want to become once again an active contributor to the sociology content on Wikipedia, please move your name from the inactive to the active list on our roll call. In other news, we have reactivated the newsletter :) At least, for this announcement. We also have a new, automated to do listing, an active tag and assess project (which has identified about 1,800 sociology articles on Wikipedia, and assessed about 1,3000 of them), and three new userboxes for your self-identification pleasure :) On a final note, I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions.
You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a participant at WikiProject Sociology. • signed _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus\| talk} 18:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sociology Project • News • April 2010

The Sociology WikiProject is conducting a roll call (or min-census, if you prefer). More then five years down the road, we have over 50 members, but we don't know how many of them are still active in the sociology area. If you are or want to become once again an active contributor to the sociology content on Wikipedia, please move your name from the inactive to the active list on our roll call.

In other news, we have reactivated the newsletter :) At least, for this announcement. We also have a new, automated to do listing, an active tag and assess project (which has identified about 1,800 sociology articles on Wikipedia, and assessed about 1,3000 of them), and three new userboxes for your self-identification pleasure :) On a final note, I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions.

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a participant at WikiProject Sociology. • signed _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Logo sureharvest.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Logo sureharvest.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 06:07, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there BrendelSignature, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:BrendelSignature/SH. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Food Alliance

A tag has been placed on Food Alliance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jimmy Pitt (talk) 18:48, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:CS-Consumer Clr LR.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:CS-Consumer Clr LR.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 21:19, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of your addition to an article

Any comments on this? OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:59, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, but I probably mis-wrote the name of the book. Once I get around to it I'll find a source with a working ISBN number. Kind of strange that folks would create accounts for the sole purpose of reporting this... neways, it's not on my list of priorities. Signature ^brendel 01:29, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So you're not a member of that forum as accused on the talk page? OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:31, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Considering how many hours he's logged upon that forum since you've asked this question, answering it isn't on his list of priorities, either. Gojigoji (talk) 07:23, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

United States

What is holding this back from FAC. I'll help out.--Iankap99 (talk) 20:58, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Pro 7 shows

Category:Pro 7 shows, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 12:43, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Sociology Newsletter: III (December 2010)

Sociology Project • News • December 2010
Spreading the meme since August 2006
The Sociology WikiProject third newsletter is out! According to our April mini-census, we have 15 active members, 6 semi-active ones and 45 inactive. Out of those, 4 active, 3 semi-active and 1 inactive members have added themselves to corresponding categories since the mini-census. The next one is planned, roughly, for sometime next year. The membership list has been kept since 2004. On that note, nobody has ever studied WikiProjects from the sociological perspective... if you are interesting in researching Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Research and wiki-research-l listerv. Moving from research to teaching, did you know that many teachers and instructors are teaching classes with Wikipedia? This idea is getting support from the Wikimedia Foundation, and some really useful tools have been created recently. I have experience with that, having taught several undergad classes, so feel free to ask me questions on that! And as long as I am talking about professional issues, if any of you is going to any sociological conferences, do post that to our project - perhaps other members are going there too? In other news: the a automated to do listing reported in the April issue went down shortly afterwards, but seems to be on the path to reactivation. We still have an active tag and assess project, and comparing the numbers to the April report, we have identified about 350 more sociology-related articles (from 1,800 to 2,150) and assessed about 100 (from 1,300 to 1,400). We now have a listing of most popular sociology-related pages. It is updated on the 1st of every month, starting with August, and reports which of our sociology-tagged articles are most frequently read. Of course, GIGO holds true, so after looking at it right now and trying to determine what is our most popular article, my first action was to shake my head and remove Criminal Minds (which, perhaps not too surprisingly, outranks all sociology articles in period tested). Second item I noticed it this month's Industrial Revolution, beating Criminal Minds, that moved from close to 30th position in August/September, to 9th in October and 2nd in November. If you'd like to discuss this or any other trends, please visit WT:SOCIOLOGY! Finally, with the reactivation of Article Alerts, we are getting our own here. Bookmark that page so you can keep track of sociology related deletion debates, move debates, good and feature article discussions, and more. Our first task force (Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology/Social movements task force) was created (1 June 2010). If you have basic or better graphic skills, our projects needs a dedicated barnstar (award) (currently the closest we can get is the Society Barnstar. As always, I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions.
Authored by _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus\| talk} 04:05, 26 December 2010 (UTC) [reply] You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a recipient of WikiProject Sociology Newsletter (Opt-out).

Sociology Project • News • December 2010

Spreading the meme since August 2006

The Sociology WikiProject third newsletter is out!

According to our April mini-census, we have 15 active members, 6 semi-active ones and 45 inactive. Out of those, 4 active, 3 semi-active and 1 inactive members have added themselves to corresponding categories since the mini-census. The next one is planned, roughly, for sometime next year. The membership list has been kept since 2004.

On that note, nobody has ever studied WikiProjects from the sociological perspective... if you are interesting in researching Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Research and wiki-research-l listerv.

Moving from research to teaching, did you know that many teachers and instructors are teaching classes with Wikipedia? This idea is getting support from the Wikimedia Foundation, and some really useful tools have been created recently. I have experience with that, having taught several undergad classes, so feel free to ask me questions on that!

And as long as I am talking about professional issues, if any of you is going to any sociological conferences, do post that to our project - perhaps other members are going there too?

In other news: the a automated to do listing reported in the April issue went down shortly afterwards, but seems to be on the path to reactivation. We still have an active tag and assess project, and comparing the numbers to the April report, we have identified about 350 more sociology-related articles (from 1,800 to 2,150) and assessed about 100 (from 1,300 to 1,400).

We now have a listing of most popular sociology-related pages. It is updated on the 1st of every month, starting with August, and reports which of our sociology-tagged articles are most frequently read. Of course, GIGO holds true, so after looking at it right now and trying to determine what is our most popular article, my first action was to shake my head and remove Criminal Minds (which, perhaps not too surprisingly, outranks all sociology articles in period tested). Second item I noticed it this month's Industrial Revolution, beating Criminal Minds, that moved from close to 30th position in August/September, to 9th in October and 2nd in November. If you'd like to discuss this or any other trends, please visit WT:SOCIOLOGY!

Finally, with the reactivation of Article Alerts, we are getting our own here. Bookmark that page so you can keep track of sociology related deletion debates, move debates, good and feature article discussions, and more.

Our first task force (Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology/Social movements task force) was created (1 June 2010).

If you have basic or better graphic skills, our projects needs a dedicated barnstar (award) (currently the closest we can get is the Society Barnstar.

As always, I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions.

Authored by _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 04:05, 26 December 2010 (UTC) [reply]

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a recipient of WikiProject Sociology Newsletter (Opt-out).

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, BrendelSignature! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

United States

I would like to get this article up to FA status, I have listed it for peer review, but do you know of any problems off hand that can be fixed, please respond on the article talk page so that all editors can see. Thanks --Iankap99 (talk) 01:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC07678.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DSC07678.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 19:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for United States rankings

An article that you have been involved in editing, United States rankings , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Killian441 (talk) 18:03, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC01761.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DSC01761.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 09:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind updating the Welfare's effect on poverty chart?

I came across this study by Timothy Smeeding "Relative Poverty Rates and Antipoverty Effects in 8 Rich Nations at the Turn of the Century" and it has pre-welfare and post-welfare calcuations on Figure 9 or "Relative Poverty Rates and Antipoverty Effects in 8 Rich Nations at the Turn of the Century".

If you could add a third series of numbers based on Smeeding's calculations, it would be great!

Also big thanks for making the chart, I created a whole article on Welfare's effect on poverty based in part on that chart.

For reference, here is the old table with two sources.

Country	Absolute poverty rate (1960–1991) (threshold set at 40% of U.S. median household income)^[1]		Relative poverty rate (1970–1997)^[2]
	Pre-welfare	Post-welfare	Pre-welfare	Post-welfare
Sweden	23.7	5.8	14.8	4.8
Norway	9.2	1.7	12.4	4.0
Netherlands	22.1	7.3	18.5	11.5
Finland	11.9	3.7	12.4	3.1
Denmark	26.4	5.9	17.4	4.8
Germany	15.2	4.3	9.7	5.1
Switzerland	12.5	3.8	10.9	9.1
Canada	22.5	6.5	17.1	11.9
France	36.1	9.8	21.8	6.1
Belgium	26.8	6.0	19.5	4.1
Australia	23.3	11.9	16.2	9.2
United Kingdom	16.8	8.7	16.4	8.2
United States	21.0	11.7	17.2	15.1
Italy	30.7	14.3	19.7	9.1

CartoonDiablo (talk) 18:59, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Cite error: The named reference Kenworthy was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference Bradley et al. was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

Median Personal Income 1975 to 2005.png

Hi, I removed [7] from Income inequality in the United States due to issues discussed on its talk page. The measure is interesting, so if you can address the issues, please tell me of feel free to restore the image yourself. --Chealer (talk) 06:18, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC01761.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC01761.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC07183.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC07183.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gyrobo (talk) 18:00, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC07180.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC07180.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gyrobo (talk) 18:01, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC06973.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC06973.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gyrobo (talk) 18:16, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:DSC04596.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC04596.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gyrobo (talk) 19:02, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:DSC04592.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC04592.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gyrobo (talk) 19:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:DSC04571.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC04571.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gyrobo (talk) 19:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:DSC04586.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC04586.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Gyrobo (talk) 19:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marina Beach.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Marina Beach.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:52, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:T-bird.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:T-bird.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:27, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:S-Type-LLS.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:S-Type-LLS.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Me after hours in Photoshop.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Me after hours in Photoshop.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:31, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Eliane Lust (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Schumann, McMinnville, John Perry and Michael Steinberg

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Aggregate income distribution in the United States

Template:Aggregate income distribution in the United States has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 19:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please halt user

Please tell or stop User 23.143.236.49 Special:Contributions/24.143.236.49 (talk) and User:207.62.246.50 Special:Contributions/207.62.246.50 (talk) (the same user) to stop vandalizing the Chinese zodiac signs, Rat, Ox, Tiger, Rabbit, Dragon, Snake, Horse, Goat, Monkey, Rooster, Dog and Pig. I keep fixing the problem, but the user believes this is a game, please at least try to warn the user or stop the user from taking chances on reviewing the user's contributions, please halt the person's actions. I appreciate your concern.--74.34.83.89 (talk) 01:18, 11 February 2012

MSU Interview

Dear BrendelSignature,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk)23:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

United States Article

I would like to get this article up to FA status, I see that you are listed as a source on the article, would you like to join me on this task?

--Iankap99 (talk) 02:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:My edits.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:My edits.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:My edits Nov 05 to July 07 copy.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:My edits Nov 05 to July 07 copy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:My edits as of October 2006.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:My edits as of October 2006.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

update needed

Hi Brendel ! ,please can you update the map Image:White_Americans.png to reflect the independence of South Sudan, and according to [8] 2010 census 2nd page I believe more yellow is needed !! "Sub-Saharan African entries are classified as Black or African American with the exception of Sudanese and Cape Verdean because of their complex, historical heritage. North African entries are classified as White" best regards , Salman — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.96.123.171 (talk) 04:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:American affluence.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:American affluence.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:16, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:American mainstream culture.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:American mainstream culture.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 19:23, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:700k home.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:700k home.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:11, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Landyacht

Aloha. I've tagged landyacht as needing references. Please have a look. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 03:03, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Colonel Warden/Automobile ownership

User:Colonel Warden/Automobile ownership, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Colonel Warden/Automobile ownership and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Colonel Warden/Automobile ownership during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:International median household income

Template:International median household income has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlackHades (talk • contribs) 21:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the dollar

Thanks for the dollar you gave me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.236.86.221 (talk) 20:52, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? Signature ^brendel 09:00, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 19:01, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:286px-Map of USA bottom 15 2 svg.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:286px-Map of USA bottom 15 2 svg.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:36, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:286px-Map of below national USA 3 svg.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:286px-Map of below national USA 3 svg.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:38, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue Red States.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blue Red States.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:21, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liberal opinions copy.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Liberal opinions copy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:32, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Origins of Whites.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Origins of Whites.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:44, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hudson Heights Income.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hudson Heights Income.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:48, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edits Sept 07 copy.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Edits Sept 07 copy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:54, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brendel Signature.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brendel Signature.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:29, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Age personal income.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:32, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:American Income.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Armani.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Average Joe copy.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Brownstown Brooklyn Heights.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Coastal California (map).jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 06:47, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 03:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Acalamari 22:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mb 220S 1957 Mark Kurtz Norman Ridge.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mb 220S 1957 Mark Kurtz Norman Ridge.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Affluence in the United States's GAR

Affluence in the United States, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. GamerPro64 18:57, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Gold necklace and pendant.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gold necklace and pendant.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:59, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danke.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danke.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive (admin status)

Looks like you have not edited for 2 years. You might turn in your administrator badge. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 16:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Upon my request your badge is now off the user page. Thanks for your service. I'd give you a gold Apple Watch, but I'm a bit short on funds right now. Best wishes. – S. Rich (talk) 19:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eliane Lust

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eliane Lust requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://elianelust.com/eliane_lust_bio.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eat me, I'm a red bean (take a huge bite)^{i've made a huge mess} 05:35, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, BrendelSignature. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. ceradon (talk • contribs) 06:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eliane Lust for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eliane Lust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliane Lust until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ceradon (talk • contribs) 06:45, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Foreign born Americans

The article Foreign born Americans has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to Immigration to the United States

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cars Portal former selected articles

Template:Cars Portal former selected articles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gold mine (slang) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gold mine (slang). Since you had some involvement with the Gold mine (slang) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Widefox; talk 19:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Conservative American magazines has been nominated for discussion

Category:Conservative American magazines, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 02:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:TS temp.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TS temp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Modern liberal American magazines has been nominated for discussion

Category:Modern liberal American magazines, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 09:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Critique (journal) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Critique (journal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critique (journal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Data source for income share graph

Dear Brendel

I'd like to ask for the data source that you used for the graph Share top 1 percent.jpg. I'd like to reference the data source, update the graph with the latest data (if possible), and make the graph nicer looking. Thanks in advance for any pointers you can give me.

Best, LK (talk) 03:27, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Template:AutoProject" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:AutoProject. Since you had some involvement with the Template:AutoProject redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Magioladitis (talk) 11:58, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Homicide victimization by race.jpg

The file File:Homicide victimization by race.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ncsucr2.gif

The file File:Ncsucr2.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Percent below poverty line.png

The file File:Percent below poverty line.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no information on an encyclopedic use, poor quality with spelling mistakes, accuracy of data is questionable since source is from original upload not subsequent ones

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Average Joe GA Reassessment

Average Joe, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. — QuintessentialAnomaly ^[talk] 10:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Professional and working class conflict in the United States for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Professional and working class conflict in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional and working class conflict in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

czar 04:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Political ideologies in the United States vary considerably" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Political ideologies in the United States vary considerably and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 12#Political ideologies in the United States vary considerably until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:52, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Signaturebrendel

Hi

United States presidential elections

Winner/Runner-up

Wikibreak

The mods are on a crusade against your map Sir.

I need help....

Scott Thomas Beauchamp controversy

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Prestige cars copy.png)

License tagging for Image:GDP welfare.png

Question regarding block of User:Eng rashid

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Venn cars copy.png)

Red Terror

AfD nomination of Anglo-Saxon economy

Income news item

WP:USA Award

MORI poll entries on UK newspapers

RE:SF Left-Wing

US culture/society

Balham station

Image:Attachement Europe.png

Image:DSC07505.JPG listed for deletion

Speedy deletion of Template:User Monterey County

Median household income

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Int. Median Household Income

Nicholas Barr

Poke

AfD nomination of United States

New voter registration stats

New Income/Education graph

Photos

Fuel economy

Edit breaking ref's

Jack Kemp

Hi from Badenoch

Bill Moyers RfC

CfD nomination of Category:Modern liberal American magazines

TfD nomination of Template:Lincoln 1970

GDP welfare.png and HDI welfare.png

American middle class GA Sweeps Review: On Hold

WikiProject: Power in international relations

Invitation

Introducing WikiProject United States Government...

Request for source

Image:White Americans.png data source?

Image:America Class.jpg listed for deletion

NowCommons: Image:DSC03957.JPG

Quick Question from a Young Grasshopper

File:Class Thompson Hickey copy.jpg listed for deletion

File:Crime International.jpg listed for deletion

Proposed deletion of Paul Fredrick

File:Salinas Income copy.jpg listed for deletion

File copyright problem with File:Salinas_City_Seal.gif

Median household income

Articles for deletion nomination of Automobile ownership

Articles for deletion nomination of Bourgeois personality

Household income in the United States GAR notice

AfD nomination of Northern United States

Income equality GAR

Coastal California

Talk:Crime in the United States

File:Personal income 06.png listed for deletion

Files listed for deletion

Proposed deletion of Lethbridge Undergraduate Research Journal

Speedy deletion of User:UBX/DeportationNativists

GA reassessment of University of California, Santa Cruz

File:Race Income.png missing description details

WikiProject Sociology Newsletter: II (April 2010)

File copyright problem with File:Logo sureharvest.gif

Non-free files in your user space

Speedy deletion nomination of Food Alliance

File copyright problem with File:CS-Consumer Clr LR.jpg

Discussion of your addition to an article

United States

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Pro 7 shows

WikiProject Sociology Newsletter: III (December 2010)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

United States

Signature ^brendel