Rezumat Principalele idei pe care se bazează propunerea de proiect sunt: 1.producerea unei baze d... more Rezumat Principalele idei pe care se bazează propunerea de proiect sunt: 1.producerea unei baze de date colaborative open-access pentru arhitectură contemporană; 2.propunerea unei metode de vizualizare structurată și a mai multor moduri de mapare și conectare de informație și imagini; 3.găsirea/identificarea și definirea unei noi generații de arhitectură proiecte-clădiri; 4.construirea unei discuții avansate pentru designul arhitectural viitor; 5.fabricarea de noi idei, găsirea de semnificații și tendințe prin scurte scrieri și discuții. Metoda propusă este de a structura ideile într-un concept singular totodată cu revizitarea, reeditarea și rescrierea manifestului arhitectural (architectural manifesto) pentru Restarting Avantgarde al echipei de autori, pentru declarația specifică de idei, făcînd din proiectul propus un instrument activ pentru un posibil viitor București cultural. Pe scurt, declarația membrilor echipei este să (se) conecteze și reconecteze la Școala de Arhitectură/ Facultatea de Arhitectură UAUIM București, pentru a contribui împreună și baza pe principii comune, să militeze, activeze și angajeze arhitectura de secol 21 a Bucureștiului în noile setări de valoare Europene. Propunerea de proiect include de asemeni înrolarea și contribuția arhitecților prin propriile proiecte construite de autor pentru cartarea unui ghid de secol 21 al Bucureștiului. Cuvinte cheie: arhitectura contemporană, București, capitala culturală, ghid de arhitectură secol 21 1 Din nou la început. O poveste cu generații (mai/ din ce în ce mai..) recente de arhitecți. In 2014 ne-am propus să facem o echipă creativă, venită deopotrivă din nostalgia școlii de arhitectură, de care mulți nu ne-am despărțit.., dar și din certitudinea că prezentul si viitorul pot fi un nou inceput, pe care exercitiul și exigența academică, dar și practica de arhitectură îl pot reuni pentru activarea unui nou suflu de dezbatere. Atunci eram 9 arhitecți făcând parte din 4 generații-de la cea mai proaspată.. până la cea de 15 ani distanță. Astăzi prezentăm inima ideilor de atunci pentru a le reedita sub forma unei aplicații practice și instrument de vizitare virtuală/digitală, dar și pentru cunoașterea reală a noilor arhitecturi cu potențial valoros ale Bucureștiului-cele de secol 21. Echipa prezentă a articolului și propunerii de
Argument 10/2018. Bucharest - European Capital pf Culture, 2018
https://argument.uauim.ro/en/issues/10/247/
Main ideas on which the project proposal is based a... more https://argument.uauim.ro/en/issues/10/247/ Main ideas on which the project proposal is based are : 1. producing a peer production collaborative open access data base for contemporary architecture; 2. proposing a structural visualization method and several modes of mapping and linking information and relevant images; 3. founding and defining a young generation of architectural projects-buildings; 4. gathering an advanced discussion for future architectural design; 5. fabricating new ideas, finding meaning and tendencies through short writings and discussions. Proposed method is to structure the ideas in a singular concept together with revisiting, reediting and rewriting the team's manifest Restarting Avant-garde for specific declaration of ideas, making from the specific proposed project an active instrument for a future cultural Bucharest. In few words, the team members declaration is to connect and reconnect with the School of Architecture / Faculty of Architecture UAUIM Bucharest, to contribute together and on common principles, militate for, activate and enrolling 21st century architecture to European new setups. The project proposal includes also the architects enrolling and contributing through their own projects to mapping a guide of 21st century Bucharest. keywords: contemporary architecture, Bucharest, cultural capital, 21st century architecture guide. 1 Again at the beginning. A story with (more and more..) recent generations of architects. In 2014 we would propose ourselves to start a creative team, coming also from the school of architecture dreaming, from which many of us never disunite.., but also from the certitude of the present and the future could be a fresh commencement beginning, that exercise and academic exigency, but architectural practice could reunite for activating a new breath of discussion. Then we were 9 architects, part of 4 generations-from the very fresh.. to the 15 years distance. Today we are presenting the ideas' core from then, for re-editing under a practical application and virtual/digital visiting instrument, but also for real acquaintance knowledge of the new architecture with valuable potential of Bucharest-the ones of the 21st century. The present team of the article and of the project proposal is formed from 6 members
From the wall that separated in the 20th century Berlin in two halves, to walls as signs of power... more From the wall that separated in the 20th century Berlin in two halves, to walls as signs of power, protection and demarcation in vast territories (with diverse motivations) – as Chinese Wall, Roman Wall(s), etc. -, to new insertions (past or contemporary citadels) – that represents the authority (big size buildings of the leadership powers), the construction narration message of the walls within the city and territory could be different and diverse: separation, power, oppression, protection, defensive, reinforcement. But all represents specific boundary limits that are to be remark in the land field and humanity culture, because they generated attitudes in the citizen communication over space and time, and anthropological attitude change points according with neighborhood, society, humans, private or public life reactions and needs. Theorizing the wall as a macro-scale construction action in the landscapes, scale and visibility are to be noted, together with the specific size, material and techniques, technology of meaning, established neighborhood relations, and the evolution of the wall insertion as significance/symbol. The article aims to expose what is the present purpose of past and present walls within territories, how their past-present significance uses resources of memory and architectural space anthropology, and to evaluate their change of message in urban atmosphere. The article is part of the postdoctoral research study of the author “Types of innovation in cultural spaces.\working with/in[ cultural spaces_ tradition and innovation.” developed between 2013 and 2015, work supported by a grant of the Romanian Ministry of Education, CNCS-UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-PD-2012-3-0515.
Natural and man-made hazard impact on urban areas, 2017
Către o investigare a protecţiei ariilor valoroase pentru specificul local şi global. Bucureşti: ... more Către o investigare a protecţiei ariilor valoroase pentru specificul local şi global. Bucureşti: seismele şi starea clădirilor._white paper | Towards an investigation of valuable areal protection for local and global singularity. Bucharest: earthquakes and buildings condition. _white paper
Presentation focuses on Migration in waterscapes: from royal model to new-scapes in Copenhagen as... more Presentation focuses on Migration in waterscapes: from royal model to new-scapes in Copenhagen as working paper, applying observations of previous studies of the authors on architectural cultural model of Copenhagen, but also discussing on a successive successful local policy of spatial development.
Proceedings Volume 3rd Central & Eastern European LUMEN International Conference New Approaches in Social and Humanistic Sciences NASHS 2017, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, June 8-10, 2017, 2018
Designing teams is quite important besides the dedication of the specialists' team to the design ... more Designing teams is quite important besides the dedication of the specialists' team to the design thinking creativity, knowing that results to achieve and reality to build are not the only weights to balance. More, selecting a team is a matter of drafting the project design and following the rules with creativity, and finally, reaching objectives and managing results for the future. Dedication to necessary (professional) specialties is a criterion for first selection. The next criteria are related to the quick understanding of design, innovation and/or customization, speed and difficulties to meet. Designing a building, a project or a research is not very different in architecture field. Each focuses on several successive phases: defining the inputs and correlated contexts; pre-designing the targets-final products and their nature; forming the best team according to best expectations; planning the design. Since
CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURES. FROM OBJECT TO TERRITORY, 2018
If architecture could be understood as a generic term and seen as a structure, a thinking module ... more If architecture could be understood as a generic term and seen as a structure, a thinking module of conceiving objects, so the Architecture of Architecture how might be perceived? Could formative education from architecture field be a way to "architecture"/ structure Architecture? The result analysis on the diploma projects could be a verifying instrument for sketching the future priorities and of new educational abilities to train. Misunderstandings from the students projects within the architecture education that are proving our results are not at the best level but equally the successful results of the students could set a high level of architecture school to be proud of. On the other direction, exhibitions with best diploma projects (two sessions of annual public defense having international jury) prove some durable principles implementing for forming abilities and demonstrating the necessary competencies for a sustainable thinking for the future architect, product of school of architecture. More, the development of the two editions of the international competition for architecture diploma projects EAM-European Architectural Medals for the Best Diploma Projects (EAM BDP)-organized by UAUIM / IMUAU in partnership with AEEA and ACE, value besides the abilities formation needed for the architect profession, also a synthetic decisional and critical thinking upon premises organizing, formulating questions and of the correlated decisions for targeting a final notable result. Concluding, architecture critic could be the applicable basis of a succinct analysis-included critic for the priority defining level of school of architecture, towards the model of conceiving of a project to diminish errors and prevent risks. The result of a critical analysis in forming abilities and demonstrating competencies could constitute a system of verification-communication on multiple levels of few common managerial and curricula's principles implication, simple in appliance, with multiple targets, for a sustainable professional space-time, and for rethinking a system of educational products: project-student-future professional-architectural community. Cuvinte cheie: diplome, arhitectură, model, rezultate educația universitară, UAUIM
We are used to conceive architecture in perspectives or even in sequential images, each having i... more We are used to conceive architecture in perspectives or even in sequential images, each having impact on the eye and the mind (of the preceptor as reader). Drawing architecture as status and by default as exercise is driven the imagination in resulting (sometimes) specific places and designs. Learning in architecture academies is actually based on sketching, diagramming and synthesizing information through drawing, which is in fact a 2D action-and-result, residing in an imagination of a model – spatial model – of possible architecture (existent or in the process of fabrication). As programming architecture is moving forward according with numbers of people, densities and present/future challenges of the 21st century, so are the new resources for perceiving in framing process and backwards of the impact on the new perspectives developed in new kinds of motion pictures as new cinematic dynamics. Even a list of architecture in motion pictures will resume for the most of the public at movies presenting architects, architecture and places, or even object design, the referential of presenter and of the (film topic) theme both influence the perception differently than in static representation of images – from sketching designs, photography or even panoramas (static or 360 degree moving representations). The proposed article is driven the sense of having architecture presented as discourse in motion pictures and new kinds of framing types of cinematic dynamics, as valuable resource for wide and academic learning, understanding the transformations on architectural design semantics and style of the 21st century. Several highlights and observations will be detailed on several examples. Present article " A discussion : (Framing) Motion pictures for architecture and critical architectural discourse – semantics and forms " / " O discuție: (Framing) Imaginile în mișcare pentru arhitectură și discursul critic arhitectural-semantici și forme " is the based of the authors' presentation (M.Mihaila & C.Enache) within Scientific Session " Arhitectura recenta – discurs critic " / " Recent architecture – critic discourse " , which took place at " Ion Mincu " , University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, 19-20 th May 2016
CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURES. FROM OBJECT TO TERRITORY, 2018
Learning building as urban program punctuates the city territory, as constant diurnal attraction ... more Learning building as urban program punctuates the city territory, as constant diurnal attraction space. Contemporary architecture practice informs on several mutations towards sustainable discourse – from the school as community center, meeting PLACE, until the transformation of schools in strategic territorial points to extreme disaster cases. In all approached cases, pre-university learning buildings architecture proposes from now on an idea of the community sustainability, from the common examples dedicated to scarcity areas, to the ones with special design, and beyond to the communities that invests active in education as driver of the society. We could speak also about a characteristic on activation of actual educational space at global level through kindergartens, schools and high-schools construction which are acting as social empowerment, but facilitated at community level. The investigation on space dedicated to learning process is lead through analyzing different hypostasis on which education defines today, the principles of sustainability being permanently ordinators factors. Independent or forming integrated educational systems, based on intergenerational principles, materialized in children learning dedicated ensemble from 0 to 18 years old and not only (important is the lifelong learning concept), these function as attractors for local communities. Developing more and more often on sustainable principles, architecture of learning buildings could have a profound didactic character, knowing the fact that the power of example is primordial, no matter of age but especially in the process of training. Green buildings principles are analyzed both in the new buildings case studies (Primary School Duranes, New Mexico, 2008 / Baker Architecture + Design; Primary School Duranes, New Mexico, 2009 / Baker Architecture + Design; Nueva School California, SUA, 2007 / Leddy Maytum Stacy Architects; Primary School Complex Techum, Olanda, 2009 / Zerodegree Architecture; Primary School and Sport Hall, Boulogne Billancourt 2011-2013/ Chartier-Dalix architects) and in the case studies of functional conversions, for example old industrial ensembles (Fyrstikkalleén School, Oslo, Norvegia, 2010/ GASA Architects) offer support for interesting exercises in case of architecture learning programs, having double connotation, weighting between social role in community and the depolluting role at the city level.
M. Zamfir. & M.Mihaila (2017). Tematică vs. exerciii de arhitectură: tendine în arhitectura conte... more M. Zamfir. & M.Mihaila (2017). Tematică vs. exerciii de arhitectură: tendine în arhitectura contemporană reflectate în atelierul de proiectare la anii iv-v, şcoala de arhitectură _ UAUIM /Theme vs. architectural exercises: trends in contemporary architecture reflected by architectural design studio, years iv-v, school of architecture _ UAUIM articol pentru/article for _ Rezumat: Adesea proiectele din cadrul atelierului de arhitectură sunt doar reacii succinte la tematica de an, atunci când aceasta direcionează prin limite stricte răspunsurile exerciiilor academice. Încălcarea unor limite tematice poate duce în acest caz la fluidizarea soluiilor sau la căutarea unor resurse arhitecturale mai nuanate, poetice sau bazate pe un anumit discurs arhitectural. Experimentarea unor teme mai particulare în formularea limitelor poate deopotrivă îngrădi imaginaia ca formulă de răspuns, şi obliga la analiza unor nuane dincolo de layerele spaiale obişnuite – de citire a contextului arhitectural. Completarea temei cerute la anii IV-V prin tematica de răspuns poate fi totuşi o soluie în formularea unui proiect integrat, dar şi foloseşte la inta finală a şcolii de arhitectură: formularea unui proiect complex coninând deopotrivă temă şi răspuns, şi bazându-se pe un studiu personal al autorului – student, şi al criticului – tutor. Articolul îşi propune să creioneze un discurs pe care arhitectura contemporană îl anună din peisajul exerciiilor din cadrul atelierului de la anii IV-V, şi sa conchidă asupra unor tendine cu plus şi minus, asupra unor maniere tematice. Discursul critic baleiază de la proiectele de an, comune ca temă tuturor grupelor la proiecte cu temă de atelier, care se încadrează în specificul didactic al departamentului Sinteza de Proiectare, de la proiectul de start din anul IV care face trecerea de la ciclul anterior exersat în cadrul departamentului Bazele Proiectării de Arhitectură la ultimul proiect din anul V care anună complexitatea proiectului de diplomă. Sunt investigate tipuri de teme, modalităi de abordare, de relaie cadru didactic-studeni şi studeni-studeni, rezultatele procesului didactic în relaie cu obiectivele propuse. Cuvinte cheie: atelier de proiectare, exerciiu de arhitectură, proces didactic, tematică, sinteza proiectării, discurs critic Abstract: Often, students' projects in the architectural design studio are only brief reactions to the thematic of the year, when this directs by strict limitations the replies of academic exercises. The breach of thematic limits in this case may lead to fluidization of the solutions or in finding more nuanced resources, poetic or based on some architectural discourse. Experimentation of some more particular themes in formulation of the limits can both restricts the imagination as formula response and compels the analysis of nuances beyond the usual spatial layers-of reading of architectural context. Completing the required theme in years IV-V by the response of thematic may still be a solution in formulating of an integrated project, but also used as final target of the school of architecture: formulating of a complex project containing both theme and answer, and relying on a personal study of the author-student and based on the tutor as critic. The article aims to create a speech which contemporary architecture announces from the landscape of exercises in the years IV-V, and to conclude over some tendencies with plus and minus, over some thematic manners. The critical discourse sweeps from year projects, common as theme to all groups, to projects with architectural studio design theme that are fit in the teaching specific of Synthesis of Architectural Design Department, from the start project from fourth year to the last project from fifth year that announces the complexity of the diploma project. There are investigated a few types of topics, ways of approaches, of relation tutor-students and students-students, and the results of the teaching process related to proposed objectives.
Lucrarile conferintei de cercetare in constructii, economia constructiilor, urbanism si amenajarea teritoriului, Editia a Xa: Concepte si solutii inovative pentru adaptarea la schimbarile climatice, Bucuresti, Oct.2015
ISSN 2393-3208
Lucrarile conferintei de cercetare in constructii, economia constructiilor, urbani... more ISSN 2393-3208 Lucrarile conferintei de cercetare in constructii, economia constructiilor, urbanism si amenajarea teritoriului, Editia a Xa: Concepte si solutii inovative pentru adaptarea la schimbarile climatice, Bucuresti, 16th October 2015 | Proceedings Book - Conference URBAN INCERC INCD: 10th edition of the research conference on constructions, economy of buildings, architecture, urban and territorial development | INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS AND SOLUTIONS FOR ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGES, BUCHAREST, OCTOBER 2015. http://incd.ro/evenimente/
Rezumat Principalele idei pe care se bazează propunerea de proiect sunt: 1.producerea unei baze d... more Rezumat Principalele idei pe care se bazează propunerea de proiect sunt: 1.producerea unei baze de date colaborative open-access pentru arhitectură contemporană; 2.propunerea unei metode de vizualizare structurată și a mai multor moduri de mapare și conectare de informație și imagini; 3.găsirea/identificarea și definirea unei noi generații de arhitectură proiecte-clădiri; 4.construirea unei discuții avansate pentru designul arhitectural viitor; 5.fabricarea de noi idei, găsirea de semnificații și tendințe prin scurte scrieri și discuții. Metoda propusă este de a structura ideile într-un concept singular totodată cu revizitarea, reeditarea și rescrierea manifestului arhitectural (architectural manifesto) pentru Restarting Avantgarde al echipei de autori, pentru declarația specifică de idei, făcînd din proiectul propus un instrument activ pentru un posibil viitor București cultural. Pe scurt, declarația membrilor echipei este să (se) conecteze și reconecteze la Școala de Arhitectură/ Facultatea de Arhitectură UAUIM București, pentru a contribui împreună și baza pe principii comune, să militeze, activeze și angajeze arhitectura de secol 21 a Bucureștiului în noile setări de valoare Europene. Propunerea de proiect include de asemeni înrolarea și contribuția arhitecților prin propriile proiecte construite de autor pentru cartarea unui ghid de secol 21 al Bucureștiului. Cuvinte cheie: arhitectura contemporană, București, capitala culturală, ghid de arhitectură secol 21 1 Din nou la început. O poveste cu generații (mai/ din ce în ce mai..) recente de arhitecți. In 2014 ne-am propus să facem o echipă creativă, venită deopotrivă din nostalgia școlii de arhitectură, de care mulți nu ne-am despărțit.., dar și din certitudinea că prezentul si viitorul pot fi un nou inceput, pe care exercitiul și exigența academică, dar și practica de arhitectură îl pot reuni pentru activarea unui nou suflu de dezbatere. Atunci eram 9 arhitecți făcând parte din 4 generații-de la cea mai proaspată.. până la cea de 15 ani distanță. Astăzi prezentăm inima ideilor de atunci pentru a le reedita sub forma unei aplicații practice și instrument de vizitare virtuală/digitală, dar și pentru cunoașterea reală a noilor arhitecturi cu potențial valoros ale Bucureștiului-cele de secol 21. Echipa prezentă a articolului și propunerii de
Argument 10/2018. Bucharest - European Capital pf Culture, 2018
https://argument.uauim.ro/en/issues/10/247/
Main ideas on which the project proposal is based a... more https://argument.uauim.ro/en/issues/10/247/ Main ideas on which the project proposal is based are : 1. producing a peer production collaborative open access data base for contemporary architecture; 2. proposing a structural visualization method and several modes of mapping and linking information and relevant images; 3. founding and defining a young generation of architectural projects-buildings; 4. gathering an advanced discussion for future architectural design; 5. fabricating new ideas, finding meaning and tendencies through short writings and discussions. Proposed method is to structure the ideas in a singular concept together with revisiting, reediting and rewriting the team's manifest Restarting Avant-garde for specific declaration of ideas, making from the specific proposed project an active instrument for a future cultural Bucharest. In few words, the team members declaration is to connect and reconnect with the School of Architecture / Faculty of Architecture UAUIM Bucharest, to contribute together and on common principles, militate for, activate and enrolling 21st century architecture to European new setups. The project proposal includes also the architects enrolling and contributing through their own projects to mapping a guide of 21st century Bucharest. keywords: contemporary architecture, Bucharest, cultural capital, 21st century architecture guide. 1 Again at the beginning. A story with (more and more..) recent generations of architects. In 2014 we would propose ourselves to start a creative team, coming also from the school of architecture dreaming, from which many of us never disunite.., but also from the certitude of the present and the future could be a fresh commencement beginning, that exercise and academic exigency, but architectural practice could reunite for activating a new breath of discussion. Then we were 9 architects, part of 4 generations-from the very fresh.. to the 15 years distance. Today we are presenting the ideas' core from then, for re-editing under a practical application and virtual/digital visiting instrument, but also for real acquaintance knowledge of the new architecture with valuable potential of Bucharest-the ones of the 21st century. The present team of the article and of the project proposal is formed from 6 members
From the wall that separated in the 20th century Berlin in two halves, to walls as signs of power... more From the wall that separated in the 20th century Berlin in two halves, to walls as signs of power, protection and demarcation in vast territories (with diverse motivations) – as Chinese Wall, Roman Wall(s), etc. -, to new insertions (past or contemporary citadels) – that represents the authority (big size buildings of the leadership powers), the construction narration message of the walls within the city and territory could be different and diverse: separation, power, oppression, protection, defensive, reinforcement. But all represents specific boundary limits that are to be remark in the land field and humanity culture, because they generated attitudes in the citizen communication over space and time, and anthropological attitude change points according with neighborhood, society, humans, private or public life reactions and needs. Theorizing the wall as a macro-scale construction action in the landscapes, scale and visibility are to be noted, together with the specific size, material and techniques, technology of meaning, established neighborhood relations, and the evolution of the wall insertion as significance/symbol. The article aims to expose what is the present purpose of past and present walls within territories, how their past-present significance uses resources of memory and architectural space anthropology, and to evaluate their change of message in urban atmosphere. The article is part of the postdoctoral research study of the author “Types of innovation in cultural spaces.\working with/in[ cultural spaces_ tradition and innovation.” developed between 2013 and 2015, work supported by a grant of the Romanian Ministry of Education, CNCS-UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-PD-2012-3-0515.
Natural and man-made hazard impact on urban areas, 2017
Către o investigare a protecţiei ariilor valoroase pentru specificul local şi global. Bucureşti: ... more Către o investigare a protecţiei ariilor valoroase pentru specificul local şi global. Bucureşti: seismele şi starea clădirilor._white paper | Towards an investigation of valuable areal protection for local and global singularity. Bucharest: earthquakes and buildings condition. _white paper
Presentation focuses on Migration in waterscapes: from royal model to new-scapes in Copenhagen as... more Presentation focuses on Migration in waterscapes: from royal model to new-scapes in Copenhagen as working paper, applying observations of previous studies of the authors on architectural cultural model of Copenhagen, but also discussing on a successive successful local policy of spatial development.
Proceedings Volume 3rd Central & Eastern European LUMEN International Conference New Approaches in Social and Humanistic Sciences NASHS 2017, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, June 8-10, 2017, 2018
Designing teams is quite important besides the dedication of the specialists' team to the design ... more Designing teams is quite important besides the dedication of the specialists' team to the design thinking creativity, knowing that results to achieve and reality to build are not the only weights to balance. More, selecting a team is a matter of drafting the project design and following the rules with creativity, and finally, reaching objectives and managing results for the future. Dedication to necessary (professional) specialties is a criterion for first selection. The next criteria are related to the quick understanding of design, innovation and/or customization, speed and difficulties to meet. Designing a building, a project or a research is not very different in architecture field. Each focuses on several successive phases: defining the inputs and correlated contexts; pre-designing the targets-final products and their nature; forming the best team according to best expectations; planning the design. Since
CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURES. FROM OBJECT TO TERRITORY, 2018
If architecture could be understood as a generic term and seen as a structure, a thinking module ... more If architecture could be understood as a generic term and seen as a structure, a thinking module of conceiving objects, so the Architecture of Architecture how might be perceived? Could formative education from architecture field be a way to "architecture"/ structure Architecture? The result analysis on the diploma projects could be a verifying instrument for sketching the future priorities and of new educational abilities to train. Misunderstandings from the students projects within the architecture education that are proving our results are not at the best level but equally the successful results of the students could set a high level of architecture school to be proud of. On the other direction, exhibitions with best diploma projects (two sessions of annual public defense having international jury) prove some durable principles implementing for forming abilities and demonstrating the necessary competencies for a sustainable thinking for the future architect, product of school of architecture. More, the development of the two editions of the international competition for architecture diploma projects EAM-European Architectural Medals for the Best Diploma Projects (EAM BDP)-organized by UAUIM / IMUAU in partnership with AEEA and ACE, value besides the abilities formation needed for the architect profession, also a synthetic decisional and critical thinking upon premises organizing, formulating questions and of the correlated decisions for targeting a final notable result. Concluding, architecture critic could be the applicable basis of a succinct analysis-included critic for the priority defining level of school of architecture, towards the model of conceiving of a project to diminish errors and prevent risks. The result of a critical analysis in forming abilities and demonstrating competencies could constitute a system of verification-communication on multiple levels of few common managerial and curricula's principles implication, simple in appliance, with multiple targets, for a sustainable professional space-time, and for rethinking a system of educational products: project-student-future professional-architectural community. Cuvinte cheie: diplome, arhitectură, model, rezultate educația universitară, UAUIM
We are used to conceive architecture in perspectives or even in sequential images, each having i... more We are used to conceive architecture in perspectives or even in sequential images, each having impact on the eye and the mind (of the preceptor as reader). Drawing architecture as status and by default as exercise is driven the imagination in resulting (sometimes) specific places and designs. Learning in architecture academies is actually based on sketching, diagramming and synthesizing information through drawing, which is in fact a 2D action-and-result, residing in an imagination of a model – spatial model – of possible architecture (existent or in the process of fabrication). As programming architecture is moving forward according with numbers of people, densities and present/future challenges of the 21st century, so are the new resources for perceiving in framing process and backwards of the impact on the new perspectives developed in new kinds of motion pictures as new cinematic dynamics. Even a list of architecture in motion pictures will resume for the most of the public at movies presenting architects, architecture and places, or even object design, the referential of presenter and of the (film topic) theme both influence the perception differently than in static representation of images – from sketching designs, photography or even panoramas (static or 360 degree moving representations). The proposed article is driven the sense of having architecture presented as discourse in motion pictures and new kinds of framing types of cinematic dynamics, as valuable resource for wide and academic learning, understanding the transformations on architectural design semantics and style of the 21st century. Several highlights and observations will be detailed on several examples. Present article " A discussion : (Framing) Motion pictures for architecture and critical architectural discourse – semantics and forms " / " O discuție: (Framing) Imaginile în mișcare pentru arhitectură și discursul critic arhitectural-semantici și forme " is the based of the authors' presentation (M.Mihaila & C.Enache) within Scientific Session " Arhitectura recenta – discurs critic " / " Recent architecture – critic discourse " , which took place at " Ion Mincu " , University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, 19-20 th May 2016
CONTEMPORARY ARCHITECTURES. FROM OBJECT TO TERRITORY, 2018
Learning building as urban program punctuates the city territory, as constant diurnal attraction ... more Learning building as urban program punctuates the city territory, as constant diurnal attraction space. Contemporary architecture practice informs on several mutations towards sustainable discourse – from the school as community center, meeting PLACE, until the transformation of schools in strategic territorial points to extreme disaster cases. In all approached cases, pre-university learning buildings architecture proposes from now on an idea of the community sustainability, from the common examples dedicated to scarcity areas, to the ones with special design, and beyond to the communities that invests active in education as driver of the society. We could speak also about a characteristic on activation of actual educational space at global level through kindergartens, schools and high-schools construction which are acting as social empowerment, but facilitated at community level. The investigation on space dedicated to learning process is lead through analyzing different hypostasis on which education defines today, the principles of sustainability being permanently ordinators factors. Independent or forming integrated educational systems, based on intergenerational principles, materialized in children learning dedicated ensemble from 0 to 18 years old and not only (important is the lifelong learning concept), these function as attractors for local communities. Developing more and more often on sustainable principles, architecture of learning buildings could have a profound didactic character, knowing the fact that the power of example is primordial, no matter of age but especially in the process of training. Green buildings principles are analyzed both in the new buildings case studies (Primary School Duranes, New Mexico, 2008 / Baker Architecture + Design; Primary School Duranes, New Mexico, 2009 / Baker Architecture + Design; Nueva School California, SUA, 2007 / Leddy Maytum Stacy Architects; Primary School Complex Techum, Olanda, 2009 / Zerodegree Architecture; Primary School and Sport Hall, Boulogne Billancourt 2011-2013/ Chartier-Dalix architects) and in the case studies of functional conversions, for example old industrial ensembles (Fyrstikkalleén School, Oslo, Norvegia, 2010/ GASA Architects) offer support for interesting exercises in case of architecture learning programs, having double connotation, weighting between social role in community and the depolluting role at the city level.
M. Zamfir. & M.Mihaila (2017). Tematică vs. exerciii de arhitectură: tendine în arhitectura conte... more M. Zamfir. & M.Mihaila (2017). Tematică vs. exerciii de arhitectură: tendine în arhitectura contemporană reflectate în atelierul de proiectare la anii iv-v, şcoala de arhitectură _ UAUIM /Theme vs. architectural exercises: trends in contemporary architecture reflected by architectural design studio, years iv-v, school of architecture _ UAUIM articol pentru/article for _ Rezumat: Adesea proiectele din cadrul atelierului de arhitectură sunt doar reacii succinte la tematica de an, atunci când aceasta direcionează prin limite stricte răspunsurile exerciiilor academice. Încălcarea unor limite tematice poate duce în acest caz la fluidizarea soluiilor sau la căutarea unor resurse arhitecturale mai nuanate, poetice sau bazate pe un anumit discurs arhitectural. Experimentarea unor teme mai particulare în formularea limitelor poate deopotrivă îngrădi imaginaia ca formulă de răspuns, şi obliga la analiza unor nuane dincolo de layerele spaiale obişnuite – de citire a contextului arhitectural. Completarea temei cerute la anii IV-V prin tematica de răspuns poate fi totuşi o soluie în formularea unui proiect integrat, dar şi foloseşte la inta finală a şcolii de arhitectură: formularea unui proiect complex coninând deopotrivă temă şi răspuns, şi bazându-se pe un studiu personal al autorului – student, şi al criticului – tutor. Articolul îşi propune să creioneze un discurs pe care arhitectura contemporană îl anună din peisajul exerciiilor din cadrul atelierului de la anii IV-V, şi sa conchidă asupra unor tendine cu plus şi minus, asupra unor maniere tematice. Discursul critic baleiază de la proiectele de an, comune ca temă tuturor grupelor la proiecte cu temă de atelier, care se încadrează în specificul didactic al departamentului Sinteza de Proiectare, de la proiectul de start din anul IV care face trecerea de la ciclul anterior exersat în cadrul departamentului Bazele Proiectării de Arhitectură la ultimul proiect din anul V care anună complexitatea proiectului de diplomă. Sunt investigate tipuri de teme, modalităi de abordare, de relaie cadru didactic-studeni şi studeni-studeni, rezultatele procesului didactic în relaie cu obiectivele propuse. Cuvinte cheie: atelier de proiectare, exerciiu de arhitectură, proces didactic, tematică, sinteza proiectării, discurs critic Abstract: Often, students' projects in the architectural design studio are only brief reactions to the thematic of the year, when this directs by strict limitations the replies of academic exercises. The breach of thematic limits in this case may lead to fluidization of the solutions or in finding more nuanced resources, poetic or based on some architectural discourse. Experimentation of some more particular themes in formulation of the limits can both restricts the imagination as formula response and compels the analysis of nuances beyond the usual spatial layers-of reading of architectural context. Completing the required theme in years IV-V by the response of thematic may still be a solution in formulating of an integrated project, but also used as final target of the school of architecture: formulating of a complex project containing both theme and answer, and relying on a personal study of the author-student and based on the tutor as critic. The article aims to create a speech which contemporary architecture announces from the landscape of exercises in the years IV-V, and to conclude over some tendencies with plus and minus, over some thematic manners. The critical discourse sweeps from year projects, common as theme to all groups, to projects with architectural studio design theme that are fit in the teaching specific of Synthesis of Architectural Design Department, from the start project from fourth year to the last project from fifth year that announces the complexity of the diploma project. There are investigated a few types of topics, ways of approaches, of relation tutor-students and students-students, and the results of the teaching process related to proposed objectives.
Lucrarile conferintei de cercetare in constructii, economia constructiilor, urbanism si amenajarea teritoriului, Editia a Xa: Concepte si solutii inovative pentru adaptarea la schimbarile climatice, Bucuresti, Oct.2015
ISSN 2393-3208
Lucrarile conferintei de cercetare in constructii, economia constructiilor, urbani... more ISSN 2393-3208 Lucrarile conferintei de cercetare in constructii, economia constructiilor, urbanism si amenajarea teritoriului, Editia a Xa: Concepte si solutii inovative pentru adaptarea la schimbarile climatice, Bucuresti, 16th October 2015 | Proceedings Book - Conference URBAN INCERC INCD: 10th edition of the research conference on constructions, economy of buildings, architecture, urban and territorial development | INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS AND SOLUTIONS FOR ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGES, BUCHAREST, OCTOBER 2015. http://incd.ro/evenimente/
Abstracts - ICAR 2012. ICAR 2012 International Conference on Architectural Research: (re)writing ... more Abstracts - ICAR 2012. ICAR 2012 International Conference on Architectural Research: (re)writing history. Book · May 2012
Edition: 1, Publisher: Editura Universitară „Ion Mincu” Bucureşti, Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger, Andra Panait, Editor: UAUIM, Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger, Andra Panait, Marina Mihaila, Daniel Comşa, ISBN: 978-606-638-022-5 Editura Universitară „Ion Mincu” Bucureşti, Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger, Andra Panait
authors: Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger, Andra Panait, Marina Mihaila, Daniel Comşa, Adham Abulnour, Ileana Apostol, Maria Boştenaru Dan, Dragoş Horia Buhociu, João Paulo Cardielos, Stefania Chirico, Laura Vivola, Luigi Chirone, Cristina Constantinescu, Mihaela Hărmănescu, Ilinca Constantinescu, Cerasella Craciun, Cristina Enache, Giuseppe Gangemi, Cristina Olga Gociman, Sever Georgescu, Tiberiu Florescu, Artan Hysa, Bob Jarvis, Valbona Koçi, Andrei Eugen Lakatos, Vera Marin, Ana Opriş, Gabriel Pascariu, Simona Pascariu, Alexandru-Ionut Petrişor, Andreea Popa, Alexandru Calcatinge, Radu Radoslav, Tudor Morar, Monica Rădulescu, Angelica Stan, Branislava Stoiljkovic, Goran Jovanovic, Nataša Petkovic, Tai-Chee WONG, Ramona Albert, Ionuţ Anton, Daniel Armenciu, Konstantinos Antoniou, Kleo Axarli, Aikaterini Meresi, Bogdan-Eugen Bănică, Laura Andreea Burlacu, Oana Andreea Caplescu, Andreea Iosif, Safaa M. Issa Abdou, Slaviša Kondic, Ivan Kostic, Milan Tanic, Aleksandra Kostic, Miloš Dacic, Nikola Cekic, Ana-Maria Machedon, Justin Ionescu, Oana Mihăescu, Ştefan Mihailescu, Ovidiu Mihalache, Anca Mitrache, Cristina Pană, Radu Pană, Sergiu Cătalin Petrea, Danica Stankovic, Mihailo Timotijevic, Daniela Tănase, Ovidiu-Horaţiu Teleche, Alexandra Anghelache, Bjelic Igor, Ana Momcilovic-Petronijevic, Letiţia Bărbuică, Ruxandra Berinde, Ana Elisabeta Botez, Daniela Calciu, Hanna Derer, Dragoş Mihai Dordea, Elena-Codina Duşoiu, Mihaela Bălan Lazăr, Petru Gheorghiu, Niculae GRAMA, arh. Marius PANDELE, Mihai CHISARĂU, Bahareh Hosseini, Ali Namazian, Elena Ion Tomlinson, Radosveta Kirova, Adriana Matei, Andreea Motu, Alexandra Bontea, Ioana Pop, Horia Radu Moldovan, Mihai OPREANU, Toader Popescu, Cecilia Ruiloba, Monica Sebestyen, Maria-Iulia Stanciu, Florian Stanciu, Matei Luca Stoian, Miruna Paula Stroe, Alexandra Teodor, Vlad Thierry, Irina Teodora Tulbure, Branko Belacevic, Antonino Di Raimo, Cosmin Caciuc, Silvia Costescu, Alexandru Crişan, Mihaela Criticos, Oana Diaconescu, Melania Coralia Maria Dulămea, Vlad Eftenie, Cristina Aurora Enuţă, Mihaela Zamfir Grigorescu, Desantila Hysa, Codruţa Iana, Emil Ivănescu, Ives Noah, Joanna Jablonska, Ljiljana Jevremovic, Tana - Nicoleta Lascu, Cristina - Victoria Ochinciuc, Mărgulescu Andrei, Irina Elena Mereoiu, Aleksandar Milojkovia, Marko Nikolia, Ioan Miloş, Georgică Mitrache, Adrian Moleavin, Florin Mureşanu, Daniela Negrişanu, Brânduşa Havasi, Delia Florescu, Bilge Atac Ozsoy, Bilgen Atac, Mihaela Pelteacu, Flavia - Maria Roşu, Livia Elena Rus, Anda-Ioana Sfinteş, Magdalena Stănculescu, MelekZühre (Sözeri) Yildirim, Raluca BUZDUGAN, Faredah Mohsen Al-Murahhem, Stefania Victoria Ruse, Beatriz Villanueva Cajide, Francisco Javier Casas Cobo, Staicu Mihaela, Andreadou Tatiana, Gavra Eleni, Vlachodimos George, Eugeniu Apostol, Fathi Bashier, Agnieszka Stepien, Lorenzo Barnó, Ana Maria Crişan, Alexandru M. Crişan, Carmen Ştefania Dumitrescu, Cristian Dumitrescu, Diana Giurea, Fani Vavili, Efthalia-Thaleia Grigoriadou, Zina Macri, Mihnea Ghilduş, Mihnea Ioan Mihăilescu, Gabriela Mindu, Anca Oţoiu, Cristina Constantin, Mihaela Şchiopu, Ioana Raluca Şerbănescu, Ştefan Simion, Dorina Onescu-Tărbujaru
EURAU 2016 European Symposium on Research in Architecture and Urban Design: In Between Scales. EU... more EURAU 2016 European Symposium on Research in Architecture and Urban Design: In Between Scales. EURAU 2016 – PROCEEDINGS ISBN 978-606-638-141-3 1262 pages 28-30th September 2016 UAUIM Bucharest http://eurau2016.uauim.ro/
Honor Committee Ministry of National Education and Scientific Research Ministry of Culture Emil Barbu Popescu – Honorary President of UAUIM Guillermo CISNEROS – Rector de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Luis Maldonado - Director de le Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid Carlos Alberto Esteves Guimarães – President of Faculdade de Arquitectura da Universidade do Porto – FAUP Promoting Committee Farid AMEZIANE, National Superior School of Architecture of Marseille (ENSAM), Founder of EURAU Roberta AMIRANTE, University of Naples Federico II Joaquin IBAÑEZ MONTOYA, Madrid Polytechnic University Madalena PINTO DA SILVA, Porto University Javier SÁNCHEZ MERINA, Alicante University Gulsun SAĞLAMER, Former Rector, Istanbul Technical University
Organizing Committee from Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest General Chair Zeno BOGDĂNESCU, Former UAUIM Rector Local arrange chair Beatrice-Gabriela JÖGER, Dean Faculty of Interior Architecture Daniel COMŞA, Head of International Relations Office Andra PANAIT, Visual Identity and Publications Coordinator
Sections 1. Actions, permeability, reflexivity Chair: Prof. Augustin IOAN, Arch, PhD, UAUIM Assistant chair: Lecturer Oana DIACONESCU, Arch, PhD, UAUIM 2. Actors, processes, constraints Chair: Prof. Ana-Maria DABIJA, Arch, PhD, UAUIM Assistant chair: Research assist. Anda SFINTEȘ, Arch, PhD, UAUIM 3. Projects, methods, results Chair: Assoc.Prof. Françoise PAMFIL, Arch, PhD, UAUIM Assistant chair: Assoc.Prof. Iulius CRISTEA, Arch, PhD, UAUIM Assistant chair: Lecturer Mihaela ZAMFIR, Arch, PhD, UAUIM 4. Future challenges Chair: Assoc.Prof. Beatrice-Gabriela JÖGER, Arch, PhD, UAUIM Assistant chair: Lecturer Marina MIHĂILĂ, Arch, PhD, UAUIM Assistant chair: Assoc.Prof. Marius VOICA, Arch, PhD, UAUIM From Partner Institutions Meltem AKSOY, ITU Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Ainhoa DIEZ DE PABLOS, ETSAM Carla GARRIDO, Faculty of Architecture, Porto University Manuel MONTENEGRO, Faculty of Architecture, Porto University Maria Luna NOBILE, University of Naples Federico II Maria José PIZARRO, ETSAM, Madrid Polytechnic University Conference secretariat at UAUIM Daniel ARMENCIU
Scientific Committee Meltem AKSOY, Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Architecture Farid AMEZIANE, National Superior School of Architecture of Marseille (ENSAM) Roberta AMIRANTE, University of Naples Federico II Ozan AVCI, Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Architecture Francisco BARATA, Faculty of Architecture, Porto University Zeno BOGDĂNESCU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Cosmin CACIUC, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Teresa CÁLIX, Faculty of Architecture, Porto University Rodrigo COELHO, Faculty of Architecture, Porto University Iulius CRISTEA, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Daniel COMŞA, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Ana-Maria DABIJA, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Pelin DURSUN, ITU Faculty of Architecture Codina DUŞOIU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Cristina ENACHE, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Arzu ERDEM, Faculty of Architecture, Abdullah Gul University Fatma ERKÖK, ITU Faculty of Architecture Orfina FATIGATO, National Superior School of Architecture Paris Malaquais (ENSAPM) Tiberiu FLORESCU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Ştefan GHENCIULESCU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Celia GHYKA, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Ángel Benigno GONZÁLEZ AVILÉS, Alicante University Joaquin IBAÑEZ MONTOYA, Madrid Polytechnic University Augustin IOAN, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Beatrice-Gabriela JÖGER, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Nurbin Paker KAHVECIOGLU, ITU Faculty of Architecture Arda INCEOGLU, Faculty of Architecture, University of MEF Rafael GURIDI, Madrid Polytechnic University Prof. Marta OLIVEIRA, Porto University Zina MACRI, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Marius MARCU LAPADAT, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest José PARRA MARTÍNEZ, Alicante University Marina MIHĂILĂ, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Anca MITRACHE, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Marian MOICEANU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Elodie NOURRIGAT, National Superior School of Architecture of Marseille (ENSAM) Françoise PAMFIL, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Andra PANAIT, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Gabriel PASCARIU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Alexandru PETRIŞOR, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Madalena PINTO DA SILVA, Porto University Carmine PISCOPO, University of Naples Federico II Rui PÓVOAS, Porto University Monica RĂDULESCU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Javier RUÍZ, Madrid Polytechnic University Claudiu RUNCEANU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Javier SÁNCHEZ MERINA, Alicante University Gulsun SAĞLAMER, Former Rector, Istanbul Technical University Paola SCALA, University of Naples Federico II Federico SORIANO, Madrid Polytechnic University Jose María TORRES NADAL, Alicante University Marco TRISCIUOGLIO, Politecnico di Torino Fernando VELA COSSÍO, ETSAM, Madrid Polytechnic University Marius VOICA, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Ana Maria ZAHARIADE, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Mihaela ZAMFIR, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest Keynote SPEAKERS Danilo VESPIER, RPBW - RENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOP Andrei SERBESCU, ADNBA
LIST OF AUTHORS:
Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger, Ana-Maria DABIJA, Augustin IOAN, Daniel COMŞA, Francoise PAMFIL, Oana DIACONESCU, Marina MIHAILA, Mihaela ZAMFIR GRIGORESCU, Anda SFINTEȘ, Danilo Vespier, Andrei Șerbescu, Cosmin Caciuc, Foued Bouzahzah, Naouel Hanane Boudjab, Gioconda Cafiero, Maria Bostenaru Dan, Alex Dill, Unciuleanu Oana, Andrea Giachetta, Turturică Ștefan Ciprian, Marta Rabazo Martín, Aurora Perra, Alexandra Vișan, Păcescu Alexandra, Sálvora Feliz Ricoy, Angela Juarranz, Vlad Thiery, Iana Codruța, Carlos Arcos Ettlin, Ruth Adalgiza Constantinescu, Genţiana Iacob, Irina Mereoiu, Sonja Lakic, Francesca Oggiano, Hakim nia Mostafa, Kaveh Nazanin, Moisescu Radu-Ioan, Marta Busnelli, Rosa Herrero, Sam Howard, María José Martínez, Mariana Sastre, Letiția Bărbuică, Tobias Baldauf, Florian Otto, Marie-Theres Okresek, Rupert Halbartschlager, Bianca Okresek, Kay Strasser, Bahareh Bathaei, Pablo Berzal Cruz, Ivo Vidal, Ciro Vidal, Delia-Alexandra Prisecaru, Federico Aru, Mihaela Staicu, Daniela Buonanno, Carmine Piscopo, Stefania Victoria Ruse, Guillaume Baron, Regina Campinho, Claudia Chirianni, Diana Ștefan, Javier Ruiz Sánchez, María José Martínez Sánchez, Francesca Avitabile, Bruna Sigillo, Oana Anca Abălaru, Milena Tasheva-Petrova, Claudia Piscitelli, Francesco Selicato, Daniel Nicolae Armenciu, Stefan Mihailescu, Sorina Vlaiescu, Andreea Nitu, Catalin Caragea, Stefan C. Popa, Silvia Colmenares, Mirela I. Weber-Andreșcov, Bárbara Fernandes LEITE, Angelica Stan, Hanna Derer, Belén Butragueño, Javier F. Raposo, Mariasun Salgado, Massimo Carta, Elena Teresa Clotilde MARCHIS, Giorgio GARZINO, Giovanni Multari, Claudia Sansò, Arian Heidari Afshari, Ana Horhat, Francesca Addario, Mirko Russo, Maria Luna Nobile, Manuela Antoniciello, Ioana Virginia Craiovan, Marco Bovati, Katrin Rappl, Leandro Medrano, Maria Pia Amore, Marianna Ascolese, Chiara Barbieri, Adriana Bernieri, Marica Castigliano, Vanna Cestarello, Francesca Coppolino, Raffaele Spera, Andra Panait, Luciana Macaluso, Flavia Zaffora, Fernando Ferreira, Cidália Ferreira Silva, Alessandro Gaiani, Norma Bellini, Luigi Siviero, Pina Ciotoli, Marco Falsetti, Davide Buccione, Alberto Calderoni, Giampiero Castiglione, Veronica Maria Zybaczynski, Mario Coppola, Pedro Bragança, Marta Oliveira, Giovanni Zucchi, Guglielmo Avallone, Markella Menikou, Adonis Cleanthous, Mircea Alexandru Mogan, Angela D’Agostino, Luigi Stendardo, Giovanni Battista Cocco, Silvia Alberti, Matilde Plastina, Mihaela Şchiopu, Ioana Moraru, Giorgia Di Cintio, Mehrnaz Rajabi, Paola Scala, Elena-Codina Duşoiu, Barbara Coppetti, Elena Fontanella, Chiara Toscani, Giorgia Cedro, Cristina Enache, Mihaela Hărmănescu, Andrei Eugen Lakatos, Radu-Matei Cocheci, Francesco Marras, María A. Leboreiro, Simona Canepa, Simona Butnariu, Ana-Maria Machedon, David Hidalgo Pérez, Moayyer Rouhollah, Simona Guergova, Ifonima Essien, Alessia Allegri, Filipa Serpa, Mihai-Viorel Zamfir, Adriano Dessi, Ana Nevado, Dorina Tarbujaru, Ana Muntean, Alexandra Tatar, Beatriz del Rio-Calleja, Alfonso Garcia-Santos, Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor, Andrei Mitrea
EURAU 2016 - ABSTRACTS BOOK, ISBN 978-606-638-140-6
Abstract & Poster Presentation
28-30th September 2016
EURAU2016, UAUIM BUCHAREST
http://eurau2016... more Abstract & Poster Presentation 28-30th September 2016 EURAU2016, UAUIM BUCHAREST http://eurau2016.uauim.ro/
Conference Paper · September 2016
Conference: EURAU2016, Universitatea de Arhitectura si Urbanism Ion Mincu Bucuresti, At Universitatea de Arhitectura si Urbanism Ion Mincu Bucuresti, Volume: abstracts book
Wine is a cultural and emotional event in the life of European society. Europe has a long histori... more Wine is a cultural and emotional event in the life of European society. Europe has a long historical tradition of wine and Romania is part of that. Wine tourism is becoming more and more a drive of sustainable regional development by creating a more dynamic economy, new jobs and activities but also by reshaping communities and facilitating social interaction.. Integrated wine architecture has become a new tool that supports oenotourism as part of a modern approach that enhances wine experience. Romania has a great potential that is still unexploited. Wine studies, good practice and further research should become a departing point in shaping the future of the local wine tourism.
Dacă arhitectura poate fi înteleasă ca un termen generic și este văzută ca o structură, un modul ... more Dacă arhitectura poate fi înteleasă ca un termen generic și este văzută ca o structură, un modul de gândire, concepere a obiectelor, atunci arhitectura arhitecturii cum ar putea fi văzută? Poate fi învățământul formativ din arhitectură un mod de a "arhitectura"/structura Arhitectura? Analiza rezultatului proiectului de diplomă poate constitui un instrument de verificare și de creionare a unor priorități viitoare și a unor noi abilități educaționale de antrenat. Neînțelegeri din proiecte ale studentilor din învățământul de arhitectură ne dovedesc că rezultatele noastre nu sunt la cel mai bun nivel dar în egală masură reușitele studenților pot da un nivel ridicat al școlii cu care sa ne mândrim. La polul opus, expozițiile cu cele mai bune proiecte de diplomă (două sesiuni de susținere anuale cu juriu internațional) dovedesc implementarea unor principii durabile pentru formarea abilităților și demonstratea competențelor necesare unei gândiri sustenabile a viitorului arhitect, produs al școlii de arhitectură.
Uploads
Main ideas on which the project proposal is based are : 1. producing a peer production collaborative open access data base for contemporary architecture; 2. proposing a structural visualization method and several modes of mapping and linking information and relevant images; 3. founding and defining a young generation of architectural projects-buildings; 4. gathering an advanced discussion for future architectural design; 5. fabricating new ideas, finding meaning and tendencies through short writings and discussions. Proposed method is to structure the ideas in a singular concept together with revisiting, reediting and rewriting the team's manifest Restarting Avant-garde for specific declaration of ideas, making from the specific proposed project an active instrument for a future cultural Bucharest. In few words, the team members declaration is to connect and reconnect with the School of Architecture / Faculty of Architecture UAUIM Bucharest, to contribute together and on common principles, militate for, activate and enrolling 21st century architecture to European new setups. The project proposal includes also the architects enrolling and contributing through their own projects to mapping a guide of 21st century Bucharest. keywords: contemporary architecture, Bucharest, cultural capital, 21st century architecture guide. 1 Again at the beginning. A story with (more and more..) recent generations of architects. In 2014 we would propose ourselves to start a creative team, coming also from the school of architecture dreaming, from which many of us never disunite.., but also from the certitude of the present and the future could be a fresh commencement beginning, that exercise and academic exigency, but architectural practice could reunite for activating a new breath of discussion. Then we were 9 architects, part of 4 generations-from the very fresh.. to the 15 years distance. Today we are presenting the ideas' core from then, for re-editing under a practical application and virtual/digital visiting instrument, but also for real acquaintance knowledge of the new architecture with valuable potential of Bucharest-the ones of the 21st century. The present team of the article and of the project proposal is formed from 6 members
MIHAILA, M. (2014). Museum Side of the City - From the Theory to Inquiry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 149, 570-574. WOS:000346372600101
May 2016, EDITOGRAFICA (former MEDIMOND Monduzzi Editore International Proceedings), Italy, ISBN 9788875877286
http://lumen.international/nashs2015ro/
WOS:000391521500009
Lucrarile conferintei de cercetare in constructii, economia constructiilor, urbanism si amenajarea teritoriului, Editia a Xa: Concepte si solutii inovative pentru adaptarea la schimbarile climatice, Bucuresti, 16th October 2015 | Proceedings Book - Conference URBAN INCERC INCD: 10th edition of the research conference on constructions, economy of buildings, architecture, urban and territorial development | INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS AND SOLUTIONS FOR ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGES, BUCHAREST, OCTOBER 2015. http://incd.ro/evenimente/
Main ideas on which the project proposal is based are : 1. producing a peer production collaborative open access data base for contemporary architecture; 2. proposing a structural visualization method and several modes of mapping and linking information and relevant images; 3. founding and defining a young generation of architectural projects-buildings; 4. gathering an advanced discussion for future architectural design; 5. fabricating new ideas, finding meaning and tendencies through short writings and discussions. Proposed method is to structure the ideas in a singular concept together with revisiting, reediting and rewriting the team's manifest Restarting Avant-garde for specific declaration of ideas, making from the specific proposed project an active instrument for a future cultural Bucharest. In few words, the team members declaration is to connect and reconnect with the School of Architecture / Faculty of Architecture UAUIM Bucharest, to contribute together and on common principles, militate for, activate and enrolling 21st century architecture to European new setups. The project proposal includes also the architects enrolling and contributing through their own projects to mapping a guide of 21st century Bucharest. keywords: contemporary architecture, Bucharest, cultural capital, 21st century architecture guide. 1 Again at the beginning. A story with (more and more..) recent generations of architects. In 2014 we would propose ourselves to start a creative team, coming also from the school of architecture dreaming, from which many of us never disunite.., but also from the certitude of the present and the future could be a fresh commencement beginning, that exercise and academic exigency, but architectural practice could reunite for activating a new breath of discussion. Then we were 9 architects, part of 4 generations-from the very fresh.. to the 15 years distance. Today we are presenting the ideas' core from then, for re-editing under a practical application and virtual/digital visiting instrument, but also for real acquaintance knowledge of the new architecture with valuable potential of Bucharest-the ones of the 21st century. The present team of the article and of the project proposal is formed from 6 members
MIHAILA, M. (2014). Museum Side of the City - From the Theory to Inquiry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 149, 570-574. WOS:000346372600101
May 2016, EDITOGRAFICA (former MEDIMOND Monduzzi Editore International Proceedings), Italy, ISBN 9788875877286
http://lumen.international/nashs2015ro/
WOS:000391521500009
Lucrarile conferintei de cercetare in constructii, economia constructiilor, urbanism si amenajarea teritoriului, Editia a Xa: Concepte si solutii inovative pentru adaptarea la schimbarile climatice, Bucuresti, 16th October 2015 | Proceedings Book - Conference URBAN INCERC INCD: 10th edition of the research conference on constructions, economy of buildings, architecture, urban and territorial development | INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS AND SOLUTIONS FOR ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGES, BUCHAREST, OCTOBER 2015. http://incd.ro/evenimente/
Book · May 2012
Edition: 1, Publisher: Editura Universitară „Ion Mincu” Bucureşti, Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger, Andra Panait, Editor: UAUIM, Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger, Andra Panait, Marina Mihaila, Daniel Comşa, ISBN: 978-606-638-022-5
Editura Universitară „Ion Mincu” Bucureşti, Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger, Andra Panait
authors: Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger, Andra Panait, Marina Mihaila, Daniel Comşa, Adham Abulnour, Ileana Apostol, Maria Boştenaru Dan, Dragoş Horia Buhociu, João Paulo Cardielos, Stefania Chirico, Laura Vivola, Luigi Chirone, Cristina Constantinescu, Mihaela Hărmănescu, Ilinca Constantinescu, Cerasella Craciun, Cristina Enache, Giuseppe Gangemi, Cristina Olga Gociman, Sever Georgescu, Tiberiu Florescu, Artan Hysa, Bob Jarvis, Valbona Koçi, Andrei Eugen Lakatos, Vera Marin, Ana Opriş, Gabriel Pascariu, Simona Pascariu, Alexandru-Ionut Petrişor, Andreea Popa, Alexandru Calcatinge, Radu Radoslav, Tudor Morar, Monica Rădulescu, Angelica Stan, Branislava Stoiljkovic, Goran Jovanovic, Nataša Petkovic, Tai-Chee WONG, Ramona Albert, Ionuţ Anton, Daniel Armenciu, Konstantinos Antoniou, Kleo Axarli, Aikaterini Meresi, Bogdan-Eugen Bănică, Laura Andreea Burlacu, Oana Andreea Caplescu, Andreea Iosif, Safaa M. Issa Abdou, Slaviša Kondic, Ivan Kostic, Milan Tanic, Aleksandra Kostic, Miloš Dacic, Nikola Cekic, Ana-Maria Machedon, Justin Ionescu, Oana Mihăescu, Ştefan Mihailescu, Ovidiu Mihalache, Anca Mitrache, Cristina Pană, Radu Pană, Sergiu Cătalin Petrea, Danica Stankovic, Mihailo Timotijevic, Daniela Tănase, Ovidiu-Horaţiu Teleche, Alexandra Anghelache, Bjelic Igor, Ana Momcilovic-Petronijevic, Letiţia Bărbuică, Ruxandra Berinde, Ana Elisabeta Botez, Daniela Calciu, Hanna Derer, Dragoş Mihai Dordea, Elena-Codina Duşoiu, Mihaela Bălan Lazăr, Petru Gheorghiu, Niculae GRAMA, arh. Marius PANDELE, Mihai CHISARĂU, Bahareh Hosseini, Ali Namazian, Elena Ion Tomlinson, Radosveta Kirova, Adriana Matei, Andreea Motu, Alexandra Bontea, Ioana Pop, Horia Radu Moldovan, Mihai OPREANU, Toader Popescu, Cecilia Ruiloba, Monica Sebestyen, Maria-Iulia Stanciu, Florian Stanciu, Matei Luca Stoian, Miruna Paula Stroe, Alexandra Teodor, Vlad Thierry, Irina Teodora Tulbure, Branko Belacevic, Antonino Di Raimo, Cosmin Caciuc, Silvia Costescu, Alexandru Crişan, Mihaela Criticos, Oana Diaconescu, Melania Coralia Maria Dulămea, Vlad Eftenie, Cristina Aurora Enuţă, Mihaela Zamfir Grigorescu, Desantila Hysa, Codruţa Iana, Emil Ivănescu, Ives Noah, Joanna Jablonska, Ljiljana Jevremovic, Tana - Nicoleta Lascu, Cristina - Victoria Ochinciuc, Mărgulescu Andrei, Irina Elena Mereoiu, Aleksandar Milojkovia, Marko Nikolia, Ioan Miloş, Georgică Mitrache, Adrian Moleavin, Florin Mureşanu, Daniela Negrişanu, Brânduşa Havasi, Delia Florescu, Bilge Atac Ozsoy, Bilgen Atac, Mihaela Pelteacu, Flavia - Maria Roşu, Livia Elena Rus, Anda-Ioana Sfinteş, Magdalena Stănculescu, MelekZühre (Sözeri) Yildirim, Raluca BUZDUGAN, Faredah Mohsen Al-Murahhem, Stefania Victoria Ruse, Beatriz Villanueva Cajide, Francisco Javier Casas Cobo, Staicu Mihaela, Andreadou Tatiana, Gavra Eleni, Vlachodimos George, Eugeniu Apostol, Fathi Bashier, Agnieszka Stepien, Lorenzo Barnó, Ana Maria Crişan, Alexandru M. Crişan, Carmen Ştefania Dumitrescu, Cristian Dumitrescu, Diana Giurea, Fani Vavili, Efthalia-Thaleia Grigoriadou, Zina Macri, Mihnea Ghilduş, Mihnea Ioan Mihăilescu, Gabriela Mindu, Anca Oţoiu, Cristina Constantin, Mihaela Şchiopu, Ioana Raluca Şerbănescu, Ştefan Simion, Dorina Onescu-Tărbujaru
ISBN 978-606-638-141-3
1262 pages
28-30th September 2016
UAUIM Bucharest
http://eurau2016.uauim.ro/
Honor Committee
Ministry of National Education and Scientific Research
Ministry of Culture
Emil Barbu Popescu – Honorary President of UAUIM
Guillermo CISNEROS – Rector de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Luis Maldonado - Director de le Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid
Carlos Alberto Esteves Guimarães – President of Faculdade de Arquitectura
da Universidade do Porto – FAUP
Promoting Committee
Farid AMEZIANE, National Superior School of Architecture of Marseille
(ENSAM), Founder of EURAU
Roberta AMIRANTE, University of Naples Federico II
Joaquin IBAÑEZ MONTOYA, Madrid Polytechnic University
Madalena PINTO DA SILVA, Porto University
Javier SÁNCHEZ MERINA, Alicante University
Gulsun SAĞLAMER, Former Rector, Istanbul Technical University
Organizing Committee
from Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning Bucharest
General Chair
Zeno BOGDĂNESCU, Former UAUIM Rector
Local arrange chair
Beatrice-Gabriela JÖGER, Dean Faculty of Interior Architecture
Daniel COMŞA, Head of International Relations Office
Andra PANAIT, Visual Identity and Publications Coordinator
Sections
1. Actions, permeability, reflexivity
Chair: Prof. Augustin IOAN, Arch, PhD, UAUIM
Assistant chair: Lecturer Oana DIACONESCU, Arch, PhD, UAUIM
2. Actors, processes, constraints
Chair: Prof. Ana-Maria DABIJA, Arch, PhD, UAUIM
Assistant chair: Research assist. Anda SFINTEȘ, Arch, PhD, UAUIM
3. Projects, methods, results
Chair: Assoc.Prof. Françoise PAMFIL, Arch, PhD, UAUIM
Assistant chair: Assoc.Prof. Iulius CRISTEA, Arch, PhD, UAUIM
Assistant chair: Lecturer Mihaela ZAMFIR, Arch, PhD, UAUIM
4. Future challenges
Chair: Assoc.Prof. Beatrice-Gabriela JÖGER, Arch, PhD, UAUIM
Assistant chair: Lecturer Marina MIHĂILĂ, Arch, PhD, UAUIM
Assistant chair: Assoc.Prof. Marius VOICA, Arch, PhD, UAUIM
From Partner Institutions
Meltem AKSOY, ITU Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul
Ainhoa DIEZ DE PABLOS, ETSAM
Carla GARRIDO, Faculty of Architecture, Porto University
Manuel MONTENEGRO, Faculty of Architecture, Porto University
Maria Luna NOBILE, University of Naples Federico II
Maria José PIZARRO, ETSAM, Madrid Polytechnic University
Conference secretariat at UAUIM
Daniel ARMENCIU
Scientific Committee
Meltem AKSOY, Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Architecture
Farid AMEZIANE, National Superior School of Architecture of Marseille
(ENSAM)
Roberta AMIRANTE, University of Naples Federico II
Ozan AVCI, Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Architecture
Francisco BARATA, Faculty of Architecture, Porto University
Zeno BOGDĂNESCU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban
Planning Bucharest
Cosmin CACIUC, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Teresa CÁLIX, Faculty of Architecture, Porto University
Rodrigo COELHO, Faculty of Architecture, Porto University
Iulius CRISTEA, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Daniel COMŞA, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Ana-Maria DABIJA, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Pelin DURSUN, ITU Faculty of Architecture
Codina DUŞOIU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Cristina ENACHE, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Arzu ERDEM, Faculty of Architecture, Abdullah Gul University
Fatma ERKÖK, ITU Faculty of Architecture
Orfina FATIGATO, National Superior School of Architecture Paris Malaquais
(ENSAPM)
Tiberiu FLORESCU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Ştefan GHENCIULESCU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban
Planning Bucharest
Celia GHYKA, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Ángel Benigno GONZÁLEZ AVILÉS, Alicante University
Joaquin IBAÑEZ MONTOYA, Madrid Polytechnic University
Augustin IOAN, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Beatrice-Gabriela JÖGER, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban
Planning Bucharest
Nurbin Paker KAHVECIOGLU, ITU Faculty of Architecture
Arda INCEOGLU, Faculty of Architecture, University of MEF
Rafael GURIDI, Madrid Polytechnic University
Prof. Marta OLIVEIRA, Porto University
Zina MACRI, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Marius MARCU LAPADAT, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban
Planning Bucharest
José PARRA MARTÍNEZ, Alicante University
Marina MIHĂILĂ, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Anca MITRACHE, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Marian MOICEANU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban
Planning Bucharest
Elodie NOURRIGAT, National Superior School of Architecture of Marseille
(ENSAM)
Françoise PAMFIL, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Andra PANAIT, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Gabriel PASCARIU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Alexandru PETRIŞOR, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban
Planning Bucharest
Madalena PINTO DA SILVA, Porto University
Carmine PISCOPO, University of Naples Federico II
Rui PÓVOAS, Porto University
Monica RĂDULESCU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban
Planning Bucharest
Javier RUÍZ, Madrid Polytechnic University
Claudiu RUNCEANU, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban
Planning Bucharest
Javier SÁNCHEZ MERINA, Alicante University
Gulsun SAĞLAMER, Former Rector, Istanbul Technical University
Paola SCALA, University of Naples Federico II
Federico SORIANO, Madrid Polytechnic University
Jose María TORRES NADAL, Alicante University
Marco TRISCIUOGLIO, Politecnico di Torino
Fernando VELA COSSÍO, ETSAM, Madrid Polytechnic University
Marius VOICA, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Ana Maria ZAHARIADE, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban
Planning Bucharest
Mihaela ZAMFIR, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urban Planning
Bucharest
Keynote SPEAKERS
Danilo VESPIER, RPBW - RENZO PIANO BUILDING WORKSHOP
Andrei SERBESCU, ADNBA
LIST OF AUTHORS:
Beatrice-Gabriela Jöger, Ana-Maria DABIJA, Augustin IOAN, Daniel COMŞA, Francoise PAMFIL, Oana DIACONESCU, Marina MIHAILA, Mihaela ZAMFIR GRIGORESCU, Anda SFINTEȘ, Danilo Vespier, Andrei Șerbescu, Cosmin Caciuc, Foued Bouzahzah, Naouel Hanane Boudjab, Gioconda Cafiero, Maria Bostenaru Dan, Alex Dill, Unciuleanu Oana, Andrea Giachetta, Turturică Ștefan Ciprian, Marta Rabazo Martín, Aurora Perra, Alexandra Vișan, Păcescu Alexandra, Sálvora Feliz Ricoy, Angela Juarranz, Vlad Thiery, Iana Codruța, Carlos Arcos Ettlin, Ruth Adalgiza Constantinescu, Genţiana Iacob, Irina Mereoiu, Sonja Lakic, Francesca Oggiano, Hakim nia Mostafa, Kaveh Nazanin, Moisescu Radu-Ioan, Marta Busnelli, Rosa Herrero, Sam Howard, María José Martínez, Mariana Sastre, Letiția Bărbuică, Tobias Baldauf, Florian Otto, Marie-Theres Okresek, Rupert Halbartschlager, Bianca Okresek, Kay Strasser, Bahareh Bathaei, Pablo Berzal Cruz, Ivo Vidal, Ciro Vidal, Delia-Alexandra Prisecaru, Federico Aru, Mihaela Staicu, Daniela Buonanno, Carmine Piscopo, Stefania Victoria Ruse, Guillaume Baron, Regina Campinho, Claudia Chirianni, Diana Ștefan, Javier Ruiz Sánchez, María José Martínez Sánchez, Francesca Avitabile, Bruna Sigillo, Oana Anca Abălaru, Milena Tasheva-Petrova, Claudia Piscitelli, Francesco Selicato, Daniel Nicolae Armenciu, Stefan Mihailescu, Sorina Vlaiescu, Andreea Nitu, Catalin Caragea, Stefan C. Popa, Silvia Colmenares, Mirela I. Weber-Andreșcov, Bárbara Fernandes LEITE, Angelica Stan, Hanna Derer, Belén Butragueño, Javier F. Raposo, Mariasun Salgado, Massimo Carta, Elena Teresa Clotilde MARCHIS, Giorgio GARZINO, Giovanni Multari, Claudia Sansò, Arian Heidari Afshari, Ana Horhat, Francesca Addario, Mirko Russo, Maria Luna Nobile, Manuela Antoniciello, Ioana Virginia Craiovan, Marco Bovati, Katrin Rappl, Leandro Medrano, Maria Pia Amore, Marianna Ascolese, Chiara Barbieri, Adriana Bernieri, Marica Castigliano, Vanna Cestarello, Francesca Coppolino, Raffaele Spera, Andra Panait, Luciana Macaluso, Flavia Zaffora, Fernando Ferreira, Cidália Ferreira Silva, Alessandro Gaiani, Norma Bellini, Luigi Siviero, Pina Ciotoli, Marco Falsetti, Davide Buccione, Alberto Calderoni, Giampiero Castiglione, Veronica Maria Zybaczynski, Mario Coppola, Pedro Bragança, Marta Oliveira, Giovanni Zucchi, Guglielmo Avallone, Markella Menikou, Adonis Cleanthous, Mircea Alexandru Mogan, Angela D’Agostino, Luigi Stendardo, Giovanni Battista Cocco, Silvia Alberti, Matilde Plastina, Mihaela Şchiopu, Ioana Moraru, Giorgia Di Cintio, Mehrnaz Rajabi, Paola Scala, Elena-Codina Duşoiu, Barbara Coppetti, Elena Fontanella, Chiara Toscani, Giorgia Cedro, Cristina Enache, Mihaela Hărmănescu, Andrei Eugen Lakatos, Radu-Matei Cocheci, Francesco Marras, María A. Leboreiro, Simona Canepa, Simona Butnariu, Ana-Maria Machedon, David Hidalgo Pérez, Moayyer Rouhollah, Simona Guergova, Ifonima Essien, Alessia Allegri, Filipa Serpa, Mihai-Viorel Zamfir, Adriano Dessi, Ana Nevado, Dorina Tarbujaru, Ana Muntean, Alexandra Tatar, Beatriz del Rio-Calleja, Alfonso Garcia-Santos, Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor, Andrei Mitrea
28-30th September 2016
EURAU2016, UAUIM BUCHAREST
http://eurau2016.uauim.ro/
Conference Paper · September 2016
Conference: EURAU2016, Universitatea de Arhitectura si Urbanism Ion Mincu Bucuresti, At Universitatea de Arhitectura si Urbanism Ion Mincu Bucuresti, Volume: abstracts book