- noneedit
- Hi, after studying at the Universties of Cambridge and York, I gained a degree in Theoretical Physics in 1990 (IIi). Cosmology is of interest to me and it seems that the Concordance Model is incorrect - and that changes are needed. After careful thought about the flatness problem and gravitation in 1996 the solution (uploaded to Academia) has been developed and improved during many years of independent research.... moreHi, after studying at the Universties of Cambridge and York, I gained a degree in Theoretical Physics in 1990 (IIi). Cosmology is of interest to me and it seems that the Concordance Model is incorrect - and that changes are needed.
After careful thought about the flatness problem and gravitation in 1996 the solution (uploaded to Academia) has been developed and improved during many years of independent research.
It's a serious and radical proposal that suggests a simple and philosophically satisfying alternative to Concordance Cosmology.
The solution naturally explains the flatness and coincidence problems and why the apparent matter density is measured to be between 0.25 and 0.33, (although really 1.0), it also gives a solution to the Hubble tension.edit
In the 25 years following the introduction of dark energy to cosmology there has been little progress in understanding this phenomenon. Recently the Hubble tension has also arisen. Therefore a radical solution is considered-to change the... more
In the 25 years following the introduction of dark energy to cosmology there has been little progress in understanding this phenomenon. Recently the Hubble tension has also arisen. Therefore a radical solution is considered-to change the redshift scale-factor relation. A new relation explains why Concordance Cosmology, using the wrong relation, needs an apparently low matter density and dark energy. There are solutions to the flatness problem, the coincidence problem and the Hubble tension.
Research Interests:
In the 25 years following the introduction of dark energy to cosmology there has been little progress in understanding this phenomenon. Recently the Hubble tension has also arisen. In light of these facts a radical solution is... more
In the 25 years following the introduction of dark energy to cosmology there has been little progress in understanding this phenomenon. Recently the Hubble tension has also arisen. In light of these facts a radical solution is considered-to change the redshift scale-factor relation. The advantages of a new relation are discussed and there is a discussion of the type of cosmologies that could be developed to incorporate it.
Research Interests:
A new cosmological model is suggested, a type of Big Bang cosmology but with a different redshift scale-factor relation and no cosmological constant. There is discussion of why observations often seem to support the possibly faulty... more
A new cosmological model is suggested, a type of Big Bang cosmology but with a different redshift scale-factor relation and no cosmological constant. There is discussion of why observations often seem to support the possibly faulty Concordance Cosmology. In the new model there is an apparent matter density of about 0.3 but no coincidence problem as the real matter density is 1.0. There is a solution to the Hubble tension.