Rana Özbal
Koç University, Archaeology and History of Art, Faculty Member
- Anatolian Archaeology, Anatolian Prehistory, Near Eastern Archaeology, Prehistoric Western Anatolia, Halaf culture, Ubaid culture, and 11 moreUbaid expansion, Uruk Period, Anatolian Neolithic, Chalcolithic Anatolia, Archaeological Theory, Near Eastern Prehistory, Tell Kurdu, Pre-State Societies, Ceramic Analysis (Archaeology), Prehistoric Archaeology, and Cooking and Food Preparation (archaeology)edit
Research Interests:
Inspired by Frangipane’s work, this chapter compares Ubaid-related settlements of northern Mesopotamia and contemporaneous settlements in Central Anatolia in the fifth millennium BC. Staple finance economies typical of Ubaid influenced... more
Inspired by Frangipane’s work, this chapter compares Ubaid-related settlements of northern Mesopotamia and contemporaneous settlements in Central Anatolia in the fifth millennium BC. Staple finance economies typical of Ubaid influenced sites may ultimately have followed sustainable pathways to complexity and power. Such situations differ notably from the few contemporaneous sites in Central Anatolia and Cilicia where wealth and stored foodstuffs appear to have been horded in inequitable ways.
Research Interests:
Using Barcın Höyük (Bursa province, Turkey), a Late Neolithic settlement that spans six centuries from 6600–6000 BC, as the main case-study, this chapter addresses questions of the northwestern spread of Neolithic communities from the... more
Using Barcın Höyük (Bursa province, Turkey), a Late Neolithic settlement that spans six centuries from 6600–6000 BC, as the main case-study, this chapter addresses questions of the northwestern spread of Neolithic communities from the mid-seventh millennium onwards. Presented here is the idea that the inhabitants that settled Barcın Höyük in the earliest levels of habitation were migrant pioneers, although it is too early to be certain about their point of origin. We compare the multifarious lines of data regarding architectural features, faunal data, and pottery styles known from Barcın Höyük to assess the similarities and differences with other published sites. However, rather than providing clarity on these issues, this first assessment mainly aims to draw attention to some parallel developments. Overall, this initial analysis does suggest that within a few centuries of their arrival, the inhabitants of Barcın Höyük participated in multiple spheres of interaction and exchange of ...
Research Interests:
The social organization of the first fully sedentary societies that emerged during the Neolithic period in Southwest Asia remains enigmatic, mainly because material culture studies provide limited insight into this issue. However, because... more
The social organization of the first fully sedentary societies that emerged during the Neolithic period in Southwest Asia remains enigmatic, mainly because material culture studies provide limited insight into this issue. However, because Neolithic Anatolian communities often buried their dead beneath domestic buildings, household composition and social structure can be studied through these human remains. Here, we describe genetic relatedness among co-burials associated with domestic buildings in Neolithic Anatolia using 59 ancient genomes, including 22 new genomes from Aşıklı Höyük and Çatalhöyük. We infer pedigree relationships by simultaneously analyzing multiple types of information, including autosomal and X chromosome kinship coefficients, maternal markers, and radiocarbon dating. In two early Neolithic villages dating to the 9th and 8th millennia BCE, Aşıklı Höyük and Boncuklu, we discover that siblings and parent-offspring pairings were frequent within domestic structures, ...
Research Interests: Archaeology, Prehistoric Archaeology, Bioarchaeology, Anatolian Archaeology, Family, and 15 moreNeolithic Archaeology, Anthropology of Kinship, Ancient DNA Research, Medicine, Prehistory, Anatolian Prehistory, Neolithic, Central Anatolian Neolithic, Kinship, Biological Sciences, History of Population Studies, aDNA Analysis, Paleogenomics, Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, and Medical and Health Sciences
The Neolithisation of the Marmara Region has often been considered as having been shaped by a combination of farmer immigration and interaction between farmers and forager groups. This is based on archaeological evidence for the presence... more
The Neolithisation of the Marmara Region has often been considered as having been shaped by a combination of farmer immigration and interaction between farmers and forager groups. This is based on archaeological evidence for the presence of Epipalaeolithic or Mesolithic groups in the region, and on particular aspects of Neolithic settlements in the greater Istanbul region that have been interpreted as forager cultural traits. The lack of an absolute dated chronological framework has made it difficult to corroborate the model. The recent Barcın Höyük excavations provide firm dates for the crucial middle and late 7th millennium BC period, during which pioneer farming groups settled down permanently in the region and the Fikirtepe Culture formed as a regional cultural entity. To assess the changes that took place, this article proposes a six-stage developmental model to review the archaeological evidence from surveys and excavations from the Epipalaeolithic to the Middle Chalcolithic Period.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Sheep was among the first domesticated animals, but its demographic history is little understood. Here we present combined analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear polymorphism data from ancient central and west Anatolian sheep dating to the... more
Sheep was among the first domesticated animals, but its demographic history is little understood. Here we present combined analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear polymorphism data from ancient central and west Anatolian sheep dating to the Late Glacial and early Holocene. We observe loss of mitochondrial haplotype diversity around 7500 BCE during the early Neolithic, consistent with a domestication-related bottleneck. Post-7000 BCE, mitochondrial haplogroup diversity increases, compatible with admixture from other domestication centres and/or from wild populations. Analysing archaeogenomic data, we further find that Anatolian Neolithic sheep (ANS) are genetically closest to present-day European breeds, and especially those from central and north Europe. Our results indicate that Asian contribution to south European breeds in the post-Neolithic era, possibly during the Bronze Age, may explain this pattern.
Research Interests: Archaeology and Geology
Research Interests: Archaeology and Geology
This article investigates the process of Neolithisation of the eastern Marmara region of north-west Anatolia by discussing the results of a pilot study to define the development of the clay preparation methods of the first ceramics at... more
This article investigates the process of Neolithisation of the eastern Marmara region of north-west Anatolia by discussing the results of a pilot study to define the development of the clay preparation methods of the first ceramics at Barcın Höyük. We used petrographic analysis on a sample of sherds (n = 34) from Neolithic levels (c. 6600–6200 cal. BC) at the site, and compared our findings with the ceramic technology of Neolithic settlements in neighbouring regions. The results suggested that the composition of the clays used changed over time, moving from the use of heterogeneous metamorphic clays in the first phase of the settlement, to the extensive use of crushed calcite temper in later phases. The development in clay recipes may have involved changes in the strength, toughness and thermal behaviour of the ceramic vessels when used for cooking or boiling over fire. Although the development of cooking ware is seen in Central Anatolia at about the same time as the beginning of the settlement at Barcın Höyük, the use of crushed calcite temper may be specific to the eastern Marmara region and adjacent inland areas. The use of crushed calcite temper may therefore represent a local innovation, although future petrographic studies of early ceramics in Anatolia are necessary to support this interpretation.
Research Interests:
Recent excavations at the site of Barcın Höyük provide a detailed view of a settlement founded and inhabited during the early stages of the Neolithic of the Marmara Region of northwestern Anatolia. The occupation history of the site... more
Recent excavations at the site of Barcın Höyük provide a detailed view of a settlement founded and inhabited during the early stages of the Neolithic of the Marmara Region of northwestern Anatolia. The occupation history of the site complements and extends further back in time the regional sequence as it had been established for the eastern Marmara Region on the basis of excavations at nearby Mentese, Aktopraklık and Ilıpınar, and Fikirtepe and Pendik in the Istanbul environs. The site of Barcın Höyük is therefore of critical importance for our understanding of the initial neolithisation of northwestern Anatolia. This paper summarizes some of the main findings of the Barcın Höyük excavations with regard to the Neolithic occupation phases.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
ABSTRACT
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
The Chalcolithic Period in southwest Asia covers over 3,000 years, from the beginning of the sixth to the end of the fourth millennium cal b.c.e . In comparison with the well-researched Neolithic and the Urban Revolutions between which it... more
The Chalcolithic Period in southwest Asia covers over 3,000 years, from the beginning of the sixth to the end of the fourth millennium cal b.c.e . In comparison with the well-researched Neolithic and the Urban Revolutions between which it is sandwiched, the Chalcolithic has received considerably less attention. Because it is geographically part of the Fertile Crescent, the archaeological styles, cultural elements, and developments in southeast Anatolia were closely connected to those in northern Mesopotamia. Trade and economic relations continuing over the millennia and analogous social and political trajectories have contributed to a high degree of regional interdependence. Moreover, the lack of well-defi ned local southeast Anatolian ceramic sequences (excluding perhaps the Amuq region), has resulted in a threefold division of the cultural chronology based on the better defined northern Mesopotamian Halaf, Ubaid, and Uruk or Late Chalcolithic Phases.
Research Interests:
While the Uruk Period is generally accepted as the earliest state society in the Near East, assessing the social, political and economic organization of the antecedent Halaf and Ubaid phases has been a matter of longstanding debate.... more
While the Uruk Period is generally accepted as the earliest state society in the Near East, assessing the social, political and economic organization of the antecedent Halaf and Ubaid phases has been a matter of longstanding debate. Over-schematized evolutionary categories like “tribes” or “chiefdoms” provide little resolve in characterizing the socio-political complexity of Near Eastern prehistory because they fail to account for the variability these phases encompass. This paper invites us to move beyond typological categories, yet considers issues of political economy and explores conscious strategies towards social complexity between these two well-known phases of Near Eastern prehistory. Located in the Hatay province of southern Turkey, Tell Kurdu has relatively wide horizontal exposures dating both to the Halaf-related and to the Ubaid-related phases, providing a unique opportunity to explore at a single settlement the contrasting levels of social complexity in the sixth and fifth millennia BC.
Research Interests:
The site of Tell Kurdu, located in the Amuq Valley of southern Turkey, with occupation levels spanning the sixth and fifth millennia BC, offers a prime case study to diachronically investigate the emergence of Ubaid styles from the... more
The site of Tell Kurdu, located in the Amuq Valley of southern Turkey, with occupation levels spanning the sixth and fifth millennia BC, offers a prime case study to diachronically investigate the emergence of Ubaid styles from the perspective of a single settlement. Instead of relying on cross-regional and comparative perspectives as is common in Ubaid Period research, this approach allows us to gain insight into the social context of cultural appropriation and to assess how a local community took part in this larger transformation.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Recent work by Richard Evershed and colleagues published in Nature in 2008 concerning residue analysis on ancient potsherds has provided clear evidence for milk processing and dairying in Anatolia and SE Europe in the Neolithic. Good... more
Recent work by Richard Evershed and colleagues published in Nature in 2008 concerning residue analysis on ancient potsherds has provided clear evidence for milk processing and dairying in Anatolia and SE Europe in the Neolithic. Good results were acquired from ceramic samples taken from late 7th millennium cal BC sites in NW Anatolia. The investigation also suggestively linked the dominance of cattle in the bone assemblages of these sites to dairying. Building on this pioneering work, a new research project takes these primary results to the level of the pottery assemblages themselves. Integrating the residue analysis with ceramic studies, we regard residue sampling specific vessel categories as an important step into assessing pottery function and meaning in prehistoric assemblages. This paper presents background and first results of the research, and will focus on the NW Anatolian key area seen by Evershed as favourable in Neolithic milk processing.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
The last few decades of research have documented two major periods of expansion by the earliest complex societies of Mesopotamia—the Ubaid ranked polities of the sixth and fifth millennia and the Uruk states of the fourth millennium BC.... more
The last few decades of research have documented two major periods of expansion by the earliest complex societies of Mesopotamia—the Ubaid ranked polities of the sixth and fifth millennia and the Uruk states of the fourth millennium BC. In both periods, Mesopotamian material culture styles were broadly distributed in neighboring regions of Syria, southeast Anatolia, and Iran. In each case, architectural, ceramic, and artifactual commonalities of the Ubaid and Uruk horizon styles help define an oikumene or interaction sphere. Although some researchers argue that both periods can be explained as eras of Mesopotamian colonial expansion, we argue here that each oikumene had a fundamentally different expansionary dynamic and mode(s) of socioeconomic organization. A contextual analysis comparing different regions shows that the Ubaid expansion took place largely through the peaceful spread of an ideology, leading to the formation of numerous new indigenous identities that appropriated and transformed superficial elements of Ubaid material culture into locally distinct expressions. Volumes of interregional trade were low, and population movements were minimal. By contrast, the Uruk expansion was an actual colonial phenomenon, involving the founding of Mesopotamian trading enclaves among preexisting local polities and emulation by local groups in the so called peripheral areas. Relations between Uruk colonists and local polities varied from coercive to cooperative, depending on the distance from Mesopotamia and the degree of preexisting indigenous social complexity. Once the basic differences between the Ubaid and Uruk oikumenai are recognized, we can develop more accurate models of variation in the political economies of early Mesopotamian complex societies.
Research Interests:
A multi-disciplinary and multi-institutional industrial archaeology project was initiated in May 2002 at Demirköy-Samakocuk, an Ottoman period metal working site. The foundry is located in the northwestern part of Turkish Thrace, situated... more
A multi-disciplinary and multi-institutional industrial archaeology project was initiated in May 2002 at Demirköy-Samakocuk, an Ottoman period metal working site. The foundry is located in the northwestern part of Turkish Thrace, situated in the province of Kırklareli about 20 km east of the Bulgarian border and approximately 25 km south of İğneada, the westernmost port-city of Turkey on the Black Sea coast. Under the auspices of the Society for Turkish History of Science and the direction of the Museum of Kirklareli, the first season of salvage excavations were started during the summer season of 2003 at the deserted site of an iron foundry located around 4 km from the southeast of the town center of Demirköy. Excavations continued through the summer of 2006. This research was supplemented by industrial archaeological surface surveys conducted in the thickly forested area around the vicinity of this site.