Daniel Franke

The wars of the Staufen emperors with the Lombard League have attracted a lot of attention in recent years, and modern scholars have spent much effort correcting the romantic mistakes of nineteenth-century national scholarship. Yet a good deal of work remains to be done. A detailed comparison of the two decisive battles in these conflicts allows us to examine serious issues in medieval warfare, including medieval generals’ decision-making processes, the role of chivalry in those processes, the external conditions that shaped military operations, and the utility of force, perceived and actual, in achieving political objectives. Both Frederick I and his grandson Frederick II emerge as capable commanders who pursued rational military policies and made the best decisions possible under the circumstances, despite the different outcomes of these two campaigns.

Introduction of my dissertation, written under the direction of my mentor Richard W. Kaeuper at the University of Rochester, recently profiled by the AHA, http://blog.historians.org/2015/02/aha-member-spotlight-richard-w-kaeuper/. I also owe a lot to my friends and mentors Clifford J. Rogers and Andrew Ayton, although I strike out in a slightly different direction.