Daria Dorokhina
Russian State University for the Humanities, Philosophy, Graduate Student
Статья посвящена сравнительному анализу политических сочинений русского философа Семена Людвиговича Франка и немецкого философа и социолога Ханса Фрайера, написанных ими в период с 1918 по 1931 гг. ХХ в. В центре внимания двух авторов –... more
Статья посвящена сравнительному анализу политических сочинений русского философа Семена Людвиговича Франка и немецкого философа и социолога Ханса Фрайера, написанных ими в период с 1918 по 1931 гг. ХХ в. В центре внимания двух авторов – вопросы о природе противостояний правой и левой идеологии, о политическом утопизме, структурных особенностях революции, о возможности и необходимости реконструкции политического события. Отдельные фрагменты посвящены оценке роли интеллигенции в революционном событии.
The research compares political writings of Russian philosopher S. Frank with those of German sociologist H. Freyer. The focus is on texts written in the period from 1918 to 1931. Both authors study issues on the nature of the right and left-wing opposition, the political Utopia, main features of the revolution, the possibility and necessity of political reconstruction. The authors also view the political responsibility of intellectuals.
The research compares political writings of Russian philosopher S. Frank with those of German sociologist H. Freyer. The focus is on texts written in the period from 1918 to 1931. Both authors study issues on the nature of the right and left-wing opposition, the political Utopia, main features of the revolution, the possibility and necessity of political reconstruction. The authors also view the political responsibility of intellectuals.
Research Interests:
Статья посвящена краткому анализу отдельных фрагментов книги F. Nethercott. Russia's Plato: Plato and the Platonic Tradition in Russian Education, Science, and Ideology (1840-1930). В фокусе исследования находится идеологический аспект... more
Статья посвящена краткому анализу отдельных фрагментов книги F. Nethercott. Russia's Plato: Plato and the Platonic Tradition in Russian Education, Science, and Ideology (1840-1930). В фокусе исследования находится идеологический аспект русского и советского платоноведения. Последовательно рассматриваются интерпретативные модели, применявшиеся в истории философии с 1840 по 1940 гг. Делаются выводы о необходимости выхода за рамки контекстуальной предопределенности.
The article presents a brief and fragmentary review of Frances Nethercott’s book on Russia’s Plato (Ashgate, 2000). The review focuses on the discussion of the ideological aspects of Platonic studies in Russia and the Soviet Union and examines the interpretative models employed in the history of philosophy from 1840 to 1940. The guiding question is whether there existed a specific “Russian Plato”. For each stage of Russia’s history of this period, Nethercott identifies a particular paradigm of describing and understanding Plato and shows its relation to the respective political setting.She then draws conclusions regarding concurrent necessity and impossibility of going beyond contextual predetermination Plato’s reception.
The article presents a brief and fragmentary review of Frances Nethercott’s book on Russia’s Plato (Ashgate, 2000). The review focuses on the discussion of the ideological aspects of Platonic studies in Russia and the Soviet Union and examines the interpretative models employed in the history of philosophy from 1840 to 1940. The guiding question is whether there existed a specific “Russian Plato”. For each stage of Russia’s history of this period, Nethercott identifies a particular paradigm of describing and understanding Plato and shows its relation to the respective political setting.She then draws conclusions regarding concurrent necessity and impossibility of going beyond contextual predetermination Plato’s reception.
Research Interests:
The paper is devoted to the problem of the correlation of such phenomena as post-secularism and Russian religious philosophy. The author considers the possibility of analyzing some basic concepts of Russian religious philosophy in a... more
The paper is devoted to the problem of the correlation of such phenomena as post-secularism and Russian religious philosophy. The author considers the possibility of analyzing some basic concepts of Russian religious philosophy in a post-secular context, because this will give a description language that will allow get the most complete and considerate understanding of the meaning of these concepts. In particular, according to the author, the some concepts of the philosophical system of S. Frank describes the complex problem of the
fundamental transformation of relations between people and
God. There are concepts that can only be expressed in extreme, ultimate meaning. This concepts allows to overlap the edge of rationality, and “dreaming” is the only possible method of a philosophical text in this case.
fundamental transformation of relations between people and
God. There are concepts that can only be expressed in extreme, ultimate meaning. This concepts allows to overlap the edge of rationality, and “dreaming” is the only possible method of a philosophical text in this case.
Research Interests:
Статья посвящена осмыслению феномена «скорбного неверия», описанного С. Франком в работе «Свет во тьме» (1949), а также описанию сходных процессов в католической теологии и постсовременной философии. Автор статьи кратко анализирует... more
Статья посвящена осмыслению феномена «скорбного неверия», описанного С. Франком в работе «Свет во тьме» (1949), а также описанию сходных процессов в католической теологии и постсовременной философии. Автор статьи кратко анализирует исторический и социально-философский контекст формирования идеи гуманизма, рассматривает проблемы, связанные с кризисом гуманизма и кризисом веры. Вслед за Франком, автор статьи указывает на некоторые проблемы христианской этики, и показывает, как эти проблемы решаются в постсекулярной теологии.
The article is devoted to understanding the phenomenon of “scorbnoe neverye”,
described by S. Frank in his work “The Light in the Darkness” (1949). The author of the article briefly analyzes the Historical and Philosophical context of the formation the humanism’s idea, examines the problems associated with the crisis of humanism and the faith‘s crisis. The author points to some problems of Christian ethics, and shows how these problems are resolved in Post-secular theology.
The article is devoted to understanding the phenomenon of “scorbnoe neverye”,
described by S. Frank in his work “The Light in the Darkness” (1949). The author of the article briefly analyzes the Historical and Philosophical context of the formation the humanism’s idea, examines the problems associated with the crisis of humanism and the faith‘s crisis. The author points to some problems of Christian ethics, and shows how these problems are resolved in Post-secular theology.
Research Interests:
The article focuses on political aspects of philosophical views of Russian philosophers S. Frank and P. Florensky. We tried to problematize the phenomenon of political indifference, which was declared by the authors. We also describe the... more
The article focuses on political aspects of philosophical views of Russian philosophers S. Frank and P. Florensky. We tried to problematize the phenomenon of political indifference, which was declared by the authors. We also describe the opinion of philosophers on the responsibility of intellectuals.