Nikolay Antov
University of Arkansas, History, Faculty Member
- Ottoman History, Ottoman Balkans, Early modern Ottoman History, Ottoman Studies, Ottoman Anatolia (1200-1500) Comparative empire, Early Modern History, and 16 moreLater Crusades, Islamic History, Islam, Islamic Studies, Historical Demography, Eurasian Nomads, Pastoral nomadism, Nomadism, Eastern European Studies, Eastern European history, Central and Eastern Europe, Islamization, Conversion to Islam in the Ottoman Empire, Conversion to Islam, Religious conversion and conversion to Islam, and Islamic Hagiographyedit
Research Interests:
Research Interests: Eastern European Studies, Ottoman History, Early Modern History, Balkan Studies, Balkan History, and 14 moreIslamic Studies, Early modern Ottoman History, Conversion to Islam in the Ottoman Empire, Ottoman Balkans, Islamic History, Early Modern economic and social history, Nomadism, Black Sea region, Black Sea Studies, Central and Eastern Europe, Moldavia, Conversion to Islam, Islamization, and Wallachia
"Crusading in the Fifteenth Century and Its Relation to the Development of Ottoman Dynastic Legitimacy, Self-Image, and the Ottoman Consolidation of Authority," in "The Crusade in the Fifteenth Century: Converging and Competing Cultures,"... more
"Crusading in the Fifteenth Century and Its Relation to the Development of Ottoman Dynastic Legitimacy, Self-Image, and the Ottoman Consolidation of Authority," in "The Crusade in the Fifteenth Century: Converging and Competing Cultures," ed. Norman Housley (London: Routledge, 2016), 15-33.
Research Interests:
The main subject of this article is the relationship between the Ottoman state and semi-nomadic groups in the Ottoman Danubian frontier zone (serhad) in the late 15 th and the first half of the 16 th century. Taking the two extremities of... more
The main subject of this article is the relationship between the Ottoman state and semi-nomadic groups in the Ottoman Danubian frontier zone (serhad) in the late 15 th and the first half of the 16 th century. Taking the two extremities of the Danubian frontier zone – the provinces of Smederevo in Serbia and Silistre in the northeastern Balkans – as case studies, the article compares the ways in which the Ottoman state dealt with semi-nomadic Vlachs at one end of the frontier zone and Turcoman yürüks (and related groups) at the other. Placing the subject in the broader context of the historical development of the Danubian frontier zone, the author analyzes the Ottoman state's changing policies toward these two groups. Taking into account the largely different historical legacies and demographic make-ups, the article analyzes the many commonalities (as well as some important differences) in the way the Ot-toman government integrated such groups in its administrative structure. It highlights the process in which such semi-nomadic groups, traditionally utilized by the Ottoman state as auxiliary soldiers, were gradually " tamed " by the state in the course of the 16 th century, becoming gradually sedentarized and losing their privileged status.