Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
EFFECT OF COIR WASTE ON THE GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF FLYASH E.Rakesh Reddy,‭ ‬UG Student,‭ ‬Malla Reddy Engg College,‭ ‬Hyderabad. B.Haritha Reddy,‭ ‬UG Student,‭ ‬Malla Reddy Engg College,‭ ‬Hyderabad. ABSTRACT:‭ ‬For the development of any country,‭ ‬a satisfactory mode of transport and communication is‭ ‬indispensable.‭ ‬This can be achieved through an economically viable transportation system.‭ ‬The quality of subgrade governs the pavement design.‭ ‬Practically it is not possible to have good subgrade always.‭ ‬During the last few decades research has been conducted on various aspects of low volume roads resulting in innovative and unconventional approaches of road construction.‭ ‬.‭ ‬Flyash is an important industrial by-product‭ ‬that comes from the combustion of coal.‭ ‬In our country,‭ ‬only a small percentage is used for the construction of technical projects,‭ ‬while the rest is stockpiled.‭ ‬Coir waste is a by-product left after extracting fiber from coconut husks.‭ ‬Being dumped in bulk it causes environmental hazards and other menace.‭ ‬The present investigation assesses the usefulness of coir waste as an admixture in flyash,‭ ‬especially for construction of rural roads. INTRODUCTION The transportation infrastructure system is one of the main investments every modern society must make for their economic and social development.‭ ‬In India,‭ ‬a special drive has been taken at the beginning of the new millennium to improve the road and highway systems in the country.‭ ‬It is well-known that naturally occurring aggregates used for road construction are depleting rapidly.‭ ‬They are extracted from natural rocks and possess certain engineering properties.‭ ‬Quite often these materials are not available locally in sufficient quantities and are to be brought from far off places which increases the transportation cost.‭ ‬It increases the project cost.‭ ‬During the last few decades research has been conducted on various aspects of low volume roads resulting in innovative and unconventional approaches of road construction.‭ ‬Fly ash management causes serious environmental problem for developing countries and its proper utilization with a missionary zeal is required to save the mother earth on many counts The civil engineering use of flyash is already tried mainly in highways,‭ ‬embankments but with limitations.‭ ‬Specific gravity is one of the important physical properties needed for the use of coal ashes for geotechnical and other applications‭[‬4‭]‬.‭ ‬Coal ashes are predominantly silt sized with some sand-size ‭ fraction‭[‬1‭]‬.‭ ‬Various studies have indicated that the mixing of polypropylene fiber can increase the strength of soils to make them suitable for subbase construction.‭ ‬It is true for fly ash also‭ [‬5‭]‬.CBR value of flyash increases on adding fibers.‭ ‬Thus thickness of the pavement could be considerably reduced upon addition of fibers and fly ash‭ [‬6‭]‬.‭ ‬Pith is another waste by-product left after extracting fiber from coconut husks.‭ ‬.‭ ‬Particle size of pith varied between‭ ‬0.098‭ ‬to‭ ‬0.925mm‭ [‬2‭]‬.‭ ‬More over coir pith being dumped in bulk causes environmental hazards and other menace. The present investigation leads to study if two waste materials mixed together can‭ ‬be used in rural road construction as sub-grade/sub-base material.‭ ‬No major studies are conducted on the influence of the coir waste in the engineering behavior of flyash.‭ ‬The main objective of the present investigation is to assess the usefulness of coir‭ ‬waste as an admixture in flyash,‭ ‬especially for pavement construction.‭ ‬Hence the compaction characteristics and CBR values of flyash mixed with different percentage of coir waste has been studied. Page‭ ‬1‭ ‬of‭ ‬5 EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME Flyash used for the study was collected from Hindusthan Newsprint kottayam,Kerala.‭ ‬Coir waste was collected from a defibering unit in Kerala. The physical properties of coir flyash and coir waste are shown in table‭ ‬1‭ ‬and table‭ ‬2‭ ‬respectively.‭ ‬The coir waste used in this study was in a soaked state and it was then sun dried to reduce the water content to‭ ‬0%.‭ ‬The coir pith was obtained by sieving‭ ‬the coir waste through‭ ‬4.75‭ ‬mm sieve,‭ ‬by this process medium to large fibres along with gravel sized coir waste are all removed.‭ ‬The sieved pith consisted of baby fibres which were difficult to separate manually.‭ ‬The coir pith was brown in colour and was‭ ‬light in weight.‭ ‬It has a property of imbibing water and swells‭ ‬600‭ ‬times more than its weight.‭ ‬The portion of coir waste retained on‭ ‬4.75mm sieve is short fiber‭ [‬3‭]‬. Table‭ ‬1‭ ‬Properties of flyash Description Values Specific gravity‭ (‬G‭) 2.14 Liquid limit‭ (‬%‭) 48 Plastic limit‭ (‬%‭) Non plastic Shrinkage limit‭ (‬%‭) Not obtained Maximum dry 11.6 density‭ (‬kN/m3‭) Optimum moisture 31.6 content‭ (‬%‭) Unsoaked CBR‭ (‬%‭) 3 Soaked CBR‭ (‬%‭) 0.56 The samples were prepared by mixing coir pith with flyash in‭ ‬0%,‭ ‬0.5%,‭ ‬0.75%,‭ ‬1%,‭ ‬1.5%,‭ ‬2%,‭ ‬2%‭ ‬3%‭ ‬and‭ ‬4%‭ ‬by weight of flyash. Standard Proctor Compaction test was conducted for each mix to find out maximum dry density and optimum moisture content.California Bearing Ratio tests,‭ ‬both soaked and unsoaked were also conducted. Optimum coir pith content which gives better compaction and CBR results was selected from the ‭ above mentioned studies for the base soil mix in this study.‭ ‬Short fibers are added in different percentages to the above mentioned mix and compaction characteristics and CBR values were found out. Table‭ ‬2‭ ‬Properties of coir waste Properties of Coir Values Waste Specific gravity 0.38 Coefficient of 1.17 curvature Coefficient of 4.28 uniformity Effective size‭ (‬mm‭) 0.5 Percentage Gravel 6 sized particles‭ (‬%‭) Percentage sand sized 93 particles‭ (‬%‭) Percentage fine sized 1 particles‭ (‬%‭) . Chemical properties of flyash were determined from Center for earth science studies Trivandrum and the results are given in table‭ ‬3. Table‭ ‬3‭ ‬Chemical properties of flyash Components Class F fly ash‭ (‬%‭) SiO2 49.410 TiO2 1.420 Al2O3 23.670 MnO 0.069 Fe2O3 6.885 MgO 2.803 Na2O 0.426 K2O 0.864 SO3 0.350 P2O5 0.367 LOI 6.444 Page‭ ‬2‭ ‬of‭ ‬5 Effect of coir waste on the geotechnical properties of flyash RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Effect of coir pith on dry density and optimum moisture content of flyash It was observed that dry density decreases and OMC increases with increase in coir pith content.‭ ‬The variation of dry density and OMC with coir waste content is shown in Figures‭ ‬1‭ ‬and‭ ‬2‭ ‬respectively. 12.0 ‭) 3 ‭(‬kN/m 11.5 DENSITY 11.0 10.5 DRY MAXIMUM 10.0 9.5 0 1 2 3 4 PERCENTAGE PITH‭(‬%‭) Effect of coir waste on California bearing ratio of flyash The variation of unsoaked and soaked CBR value with increase in coir pith content of flyash is shown in Figures‭ ‬3‭ ‬and‭ ‬4‭ ‬respectively.‭ ‬It is seen that there is an increase in CBR value at lower pith content and about‭ ‬2%‭ ‬decrease in CBR value thereafter. 10 9 CBR‭(‬%‭) 8 7 UNSOAKED 6 5 4 3 2 0 1 2 3 4 PERCENTAGE PITH‭(‬%‭) Fig.‭ ‬1‭ ‬Variation in Maximum dry density with‭ ‬addition of pith In all cases,‭ ‬optimum moisture content of fly ash increases because of the absorption of water by coir pith.‭ ‬The decrease in dry density can be attributed to the low density of coir pith. CONTENT‭(‬%‭) 44 42 40 MOISTURE 38 36 34 OPTIMUM 32 30 0 1 2 3 4 PERCENTAGE PITH‭(‬%‭) Fig.‭ ‬2‭ ‬Variation in optimum moisture content with‭ ‬addition of pith ‭ Fig.‭ ‬3‭ ‬Variation in unsoaked CBR with addition of‭ ‬pith 0.72 0.70 0.68 CBR‭(‬%‭) 0.66 0.64 SOAKED 0.62 0.60 0.58 0.56 0.54 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 PERCENTAGE PITH‭(‬%‭) Fig.‭ ‬4‭ ‬Variation in soaked CBR with addition of‭ ‬pith Page‭ ‬3‭ ‬of‭ ‬5 In all cases the CBR value of flyash-pith combination was higher than that of flyash. With an increase in the pith content there are sufficient pith particles to attain cohesive attraction between the pith particles and also the presence of baby fibers‭ (‬the amount of which is higher in higher grams of pith‭) ‬provides reinforcement effect.‭ ‬The decrease in CBR value can be due to the cushioning effect of pith and the higher replacement of flyash by pith. The optimum value of pith content in flyash is found to be‭ ‬0.75%‭ ‬and the corresponding un-soaked and soaked CBR values are‭ ‬9.3%‭ ‬and‭ ‬0.7%‭ ‬respectively. Effect of short fibers on MDD and OMC of optimum flyash-pith combination. Short fibers are the portions retained while sieving coir waste on‭ ‬4.75mm sieve.‭ ‬To understand the effect of short fibers on the compaction characteristics of fly ash coir pith mix,‭ ‬short fibers were added in different percentages.‭ ‬Optimum coir pith content which gives better compaction and CBR results was selected from the above mentioned studies for the base soil mix in this study.‭ ‬Accordingly fly ash with‭ ‬0.75%‭ ‬coir pith was selected as the base soil mix and to which short fiber was added at varying percentages. The variation in maximum dry density and optimum moisture content with the addition of short fibers are shown in figure‭ ‬5‭ ‬and‭ ‬6‭ ‬respectively. 10.8 ‭) 3 10.7 DENSITY(kN/m 10.6 10.5 10.4 10.3 DRY 10.2 MAXIMUM 10.1 10.0 9.9 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 PERCENTAGE SHORT FIBER‭(‬%‭) Fig.5‭ ‬Variation in MDD with the addition of short‭ ‬fiber ‭ From fig.5‭ ‬it is clear that as the percentage of short fiber increases,‭ ‬there is decrease in dry density and the maximum decrease is by‭ ‬7%.‭ ‬The decrease in dry density on addition of short fiber can be attributed to the low density of fibre. CONTENT‭(‬%‭) 46.5 46.0 45.5 45.0 MOISTURE 44.5 44.0 43.5 OPTIMUM 43.0 42.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 PERCENTAGE SHORT FIBER‭(‬%‭) Fig.6‭ ‬Variation in MDD with the addition of short‭ ‬fiber From figure‭ ‬6‭ ‬it is clear that the optimum moisture content of flyash-pith combination increases when short fibers are added.‭ ‬There was about‭ ‬2%‭ ‬increase in moisture content on adding short fibers.‭ ‬This may be attributed to the absorption of water by short fibers. 9.5 9.0 CBR‭(‬%‭) 8.5 8.0 UNSOAKED 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 PERCENTAGE SHORT FIBER‭(‬%‭) Fig.7‭ ‬Variation in unsoaked CBR with the addition‭ ‬of short fibers Page‭ ‬4‭ ‬of‭ ‬5 Effect of coir waste on the geotechnical properties of flyash Effect of short fibres on CBR values optimum flyash-pith mixture When short fibers were added,‭ ‬there was a decrease in unsoaked CBR values of flyash‭ ‬–pith mixture.‭ ‬The decrease was within‭ ‬1%-3%.figure‭ ‬7‭ ‬and‭ ‬8‭ ‬shows the variation in unsoaked and soaked CBR values respectively with the addition of short fibers. But there is an increase in the values of soaked CBR with the addition of short fibers as shown in figure‭ ‬8. In soaked CBR test the wetted fibers provide reinforcement to the fly ash pith mix by its tensile strength,‭ ‬but in unsoaked CBR test,‭ ‬since proper bond in not developed between the fibres and flyash pith mix fibres fail to provide reinforcement to the specimen. 1.6 1.4 CBR‭ (‬%‭) 1.2 1.0 SOAKED 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 PERCENTAGE SHORT FIBER‭(‬%‭) Fig.‭ ‬8‭ ‬Variation in soaked CBR with the addition‭ ‬of short fibers CONCLUSIONS Two waste materials,‭ ‬coir pith at varying percentage were added to fly ash in order to assess the improvement in geotechnical properties.‭ ‬Coir pith sieved through‭ ‬4.75‭ ‬mm sieve to separate short fibres of coir and coir pith with baby fibre. ‭ When coir pith with baby fibre is added to fly ash,‭ ‬it has been found that‭ ‬0.75%‭ ‬of coir pith will give good compaction parameters and CBR values.‭ ‬However soaked CBR values of such combination is less than‭ ‬1%.‭ ‬When pith was added to fly ash a maximum unsoaked CBR of‭ ‬9.3%‭ ‬was obtained at‭ ‬0.75%‭ ‬pith When short fibers were added to optimum fly ash-pith combination,‭ ‬at‭ ‬3%‭ ‬short fiber a maximum unsoaked CBR value of‭ ‬8%‭ ‬was obtained.‭ ‬Hence both the above combinations can be considered ideal for subgrade in rural roads. It is clear from the results of soaked CBR tests that the flyah-pith combination as well as flyash-pith-short fiber combination cannot with stand adverse situations like heavy rainfall.‭ ‬So alternate ground improvement techniques must be adopted to improve‭ ‬the soaked CBR value of mixture and thereby it can be used in the construction of rural roads. REFERENCES 1.‭ ‬Leonards,‭ ‬G and Bailey,‭ ‬B.‭ (‬1982‭)‬.‭ “‬ Pulverized coal ash as structural fill.‭”‬ J.‭ ‬Geotech.‭ ‬Engng Div.,‭ ‬108,‭ ‬517‭–‬531. Neethi,‭ ‬M.‭ (‬2006‭)‬.‭ “‬Study of physical properties of coir pith.‭”‬ International Journal‭ ‬of Green Energy.,‭ ‬24‭(‬6‭)‬,‭ ‬397-406.‭ Nisha,‭ ‬K.‭ ‬K,‭ ‬Thushara,‭ ‬T.,‭ ‬Balan,‭ ‬K.,‭ ‬and Jayasree,‭ ‬P.K.‭ (‬2013‭)‬.‭ “‬Studies on the engineering behavior of coir waste mixed soil.‭”‬ Geosynthetics,‭ ‬Long Beach,‭ ‬California,‭ ‬163-169.‭ Pandian,‭ ‬N.S.,‭ ‬Sridharan,‭ ‬A.‭ (‬1998‭)‬.‭ “‬Studies of the specific gravity of some Indian coal ashes.‭" ‬Journal of Testing and Evaluation,‭ 44‭(‬3‭)‬,‭ ‬177-186.‭ Praveen,‭ ‬K.,‭ ‬Singh,‭ ‬S.P.‭ (‬2008‭)‬.‭ “‬Fiber-reinforced fly ash subbases in rural roads.‭”‬ Journal of Transportation Engineering.,‭ ‬134‭(‬4‭)‬,‭ ‬171-180.‭ Rao‭ ‬,V.K.‭ (‬2012‭)‬.‭ “‬Effect of fiber on fly-ash‭ stabilized‭ ‬sub‭ ‬grade‭ ‬layer‭ ‬thickness.‭” International Journal of Engineering and Technology.,‭ ‬3‭(‬4‭)‬,‭ ‬140-147. Page‭ ‬5‭ ‬of‭ ‬5