African Journal of Business Management Vol.6 (34), pp. 9658-9670, 29 August, 2012
Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM
DOI: 10.5897/AJBM12.1111
ISSN 1993-8233 ©2012 Academic Journals
Full Length Research Paper
A model of employee satisfaction amongst healthrelated professionals in South Africa: The case of
Western Cape Province
Chux Gervase Iwu1*, Charles Allen-Ile1 and Wilfred I. Ukpere2
1
Faculty of Business, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, South Africa.
Department of Industrial Psychology and People Management, Faculty of Management, University of Johannesburg,
Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa.
2
Accepted 31 July, 2012
The study’s main objective was to come up with a model of employee satisfaction for the health-related
professionals in South Africa. Among the reasons for this were high levels of health-related
professional attrition and low levels of employee satisfaction within the health-related professions of
South Africa. This original study derives its relevance on the basis of lack of a model for measuring
employee satisfaction in the health-related profession in South Africa. Also, studies on employee
satisfaction in South Africa focus hugely on medical doctors and nurses, without a commensurate
interest in health-related professionals such as pharmacists, emergency medical services personnel,
optometrists, and laboratory technologists. A descriptive survey design was utilised in this study
warranting the use of a questionnaire which combines facets of job satisfaction with organisational
climate dimensions. Making use of exploratory factor analysis, the study realised a rotated component
matrix, which then helped in grouping together all the items with high correlation to each other. From
the grouped items emerged new factors. Each factor was then labelled differently. The new factors are
role clarification and job design; equitable performance management; and integrated leadership and
knowledge sharing. The others include self-efficacy; family-friendly work environments (FFWE’s),
leader credibility and innovation and excellent customer relations and technology. These new factors
represent a significant component of the model of employee satisfaction amongst the health-related
professionals in South Africa.
Key words: Model of employee satisfaction, health-related profession, allied health profession, exploratory
factor analysis, South Africa.
INTRODUCTION
This is an original study necessitated by (1) high levels of
health-related professional attrition; (2) poor reporting of
health-related professionals; (3) high levels of acclaimed
job insecurity; and (4) low levels of employee satisfaction
within the health-related professions of South Africa.
*Corresponding
author.
chuxiwu@gmail.com
E-mail:
iwuc@cput.ac.za,
Employee satisfaction was, on the basis of literature and
in consonance with the objectives of this study,
operationally defined as the satisfaction derived by an
employee from; given his or her own preferences, the
positive presence of the facets of job satisfaction and
dimensions of organisational climate. This study‘s main
objective was to come up with a model of employee
satisfaction for the health-related professionals in South
Africa.
Several models exist for measuring satisfaction (Kano‘s
Iwu et al.
model, 1996; Price-Mueller Turnover model, 1986; EFQM
Excellence model, 1991; Hackman and Oldham, 1975),
yet none pays attention to health-related professionals;
specifically within the South African practice community.
Models represent suggestions and/or solutions designed
to ameliorate or check for efficiency of a phenomenon or
something that presents challenges. Often models have
been touted as answers and or panacea to unresolved
situations. Models abound in almost every discipline.
Within the engineering sciences, models exist for tackling
unpalatable engineering situations, while in the
behavioural and management sciences, models have
been known to assist in explaining or providing better
insight into work place dynamics. In South Africa, no
model exists specifically for health-related professionals.
Who are health-related professionals?
Health-related professionals comprise a diverse group of
practitioners who deliver high quality care to patients
across a wide range of care pathways and in a variety of
settings. Health-related professionals include nurses,
optometrists, radiographers, pharmacists, laboratory
technologists/technicians, and emergency medical
services. These skilled professionals can be found in
both the private and public sector, while their roles are
diverse. They perform essential diagnostic and therapeutic roles, and work across a wide range of locations
within acute, primary and community care. They perform
functions, which include assessment, diagnosis, emergency care, treatment and discharge throughout the care
pathway–from primary prevention through specialist
disease management and rehabilitation. Health-related
professionals‘ help to provide a well-rounded team that
diagnose and treat patients.
It is not uncommon to consider nurses as the first point
of call in health care. They not only serve the doctors who
ultimately see to the medical needs of patients, but they
also ensure that patients are examined properly. An
effective nurse assists both doctors and the patients that
he or she serves. Quoting a number of authors, Fox et al.
(1990: 227) refer to nurses as those who provide care for
people in the midst of health, pain, loss, fear, disfigurement, death, grieving, challenge, growth, birth, and
transition on an intimate front-line basis. Saunders (1954)
indicated that nurses do not only do the work of nursing,
namely looking after patients, but are also involved in
teaching. The good nurse teaches patients about their
ailments and gives them at-home instructions.
Radiographers perform a multitude of complex and life
dependent functions. Some of these include x-rays,
fluoroscopy, computed tomography, magnetic resonance
imaging, and ultrasound. Radiographers play an important role in detecting disease and broken bones (Demand
Media, Inc., n.d).
Pharmacists, like radiographers, play important roles in
health care. They have direct input into the prescribing
9659
process and help doctors, nurses, other health
professionals and especially patients, with all aspects of
drug therapy. Their other roles include patient education
and counselling, liaison with hospitals and the distribution
of drugs prescribed by health professionals (Royal
Pharmaceutical Society, n.d).
An Optometrist is trained to test people for spectacles
and provide comprehensive eye and vision care,
including refraction and dispensing, detection and
diagnosis and management of eye diseases. (Millidot,
2004; Oxford Medical Concise Dictionary, 2007).
Laboratory technologists/technicians support laboratory
operations, by performing maintenance functions and
completing non-technical routine laboratory tests and
procedures under the direction of professional staff. The
roles that they play allow scientists to perform the more
complex analytical processes within the laboratory. Some
of their typical functions include routine laboratory
procedures such as preparation of media and basic preparation of slides and smears, setting-up and operation of
laboratory equipment in preparation for specimen
examinations, and maintaining simple laboratory records
and inventory for supplies and reagents (United Kingdom,
2010).
Emergency medical services include ambulance
services and paramedics. Emergency medical services
are committed to providing out-of-hospital acute medical
care and/or transport to definitive care for patients with
illnesses and injuries, which the patient, or the medical
practitioner, believes constitutes a serious medical emergency (U.S National Library of Medicine, n.d; American
College of Emergency Physicians, 2010). The goal of
most emergency medical services is to either provide
treatment to those in need of urgent medical care, with
the goal of satisfactorily treating the malady, or arranging
for timely removal of the patient to the next point of
definitive care.
Study objectives
1. Main:-to develop a model which analyses levels of
employee satisfaction among health-related professionals
in South Africa
2. Proposed outcome:-to propose a model of employee
satisfaction to South African health-related professions
Inspiration for the study
This study was carried out because of the following
factors:
1. No model for measuring employee satisfaction in the
health-related profession exists
2. Studies on employee satisfaction in South Africa focus
hugely on medical doctors and nurses
3. Low levels of trust and confidence amongst SouthAfrican health-related professionals
9660
Afr. J. Bus. Manage.
Figure 1. Theoretical framework of employee satisfaction.
4. High levels of job insecurity within health sectors
reported in news magazines and academic journals.
5. High levels of health-related professional absenteeism.
6. High levels of health-related professional attrition.
7. Brain drain–difficulty in retaining health-related
professionals.
8. Brain gain from Cuba, prompting communication
challenges between patients and healthcare worker.
Research questions
1. Does a relationship exist between acclaimed job
satisfaction facets and employee satisfaction within
health-related profession?
2. Do demographic properties of a health-related
professional play any roles in his alignment and or nonalignment to acclaimed job satisfaction facets?
3. To what extent does organisational climate influence a
health-related professional‘s work behaviour?
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Review of literature for this study was based on the
framework shown in Figure 1. It must be noted that
because of the dearth of literature on health-related
professionals in South Africa, the researchers also made
use of relevant research reports in other sectors.
Facets of job satisfaction and employee satisfaction
Research indicates that employee satisfaction derives
from facets of job satisfaction. Overall employee
satisfaction is a combination of one‘s feelings towards the
different facets of job satisfaction (Locke, 1976. Cited in
Weiss, 2002:174).
These facets of job satisfaction include the job itself;
supervision; co-workers; income and promotion (Bowling
et al., 2008). Job characteristics such as pay,
opportunities for promotion, task clarity and relationships
with co-workers and supervisors have significant effects
on employee satisfaction (Volkwein and Parmley, 2000;
Smerek and Peterson, 2007). Numerous other studies
have revealed that employee satisfaction is significantly
influenced by employee‘s perceptions of satisfaction in
terms of pay, promotional opportunities, and relationships
with supervisors, employees‘ performance management
systems and fringe benefits (Ellickson and Logsdon;
2002, Pohlmann; 1999). Van Saane et al. (2003) found
eleven work factor domains to be representative of the
content of job satisfaction. These domains include
autonomy; growth/development; promotion; work content;
Iwu et al.
supervision; and financial rewards. Others include
meaningfulness; supportive colleagues; feedback; work
demands and workload. Grobler et al. (2006) add that the
desire, capability and the resources to do the job must
accompany these elements.
In closing, each individual employee will react to the
facets of job satisfaction differently (Nel et al., 2008).
Organisational climate and employee satisfaction
There is a thin line between the concepts of
organisational culture and organisational climate. This
common ground stems from the use of the concepts by
different authors in a manner that suggests that the
concepts can be used interchangeably. This has perhaps
prompted Castro and Martins (2010: 2) to admit that
organisational culture and climate are interwoven and
often used interchangeably. According to them, since the
concepts of organisational culture and climate gained
applause within the field of organisational behavior, many
authors have had the challenge of making helpful
distinctions between the two concepts. Mearns and Flin
(1999: 6) referring to several authors also admit that the
concepts of culture and climate have been widely
debated within the organisational literature, and
researchers have been at pains to make clear distinctions
between them. Denison (1996. Cited in Mearns and Flin,
1999:6) had earlier called for an integration of the two
concepts, in order to better serve the future study of
organisational contexts. Sempane et al. (2002: 24) also
commented that organisational culture and climate are
interdependent and reciprocal in nature since climate is
to a certain extent the manifestation of organisational
culture.
Organisational culture is a system of shared meaning
held by organisation‘s members that distinguishes one
organisation from other organisations (Robbins et al.,
2009: 424). Nel et al. (2008: 17) describe organisational
culture as the manner in which things are done in an
organisation. They add that it is also the personality of an
organisation. Earlier, Reichers and Schneider (1990: 6)
had suggested that climate denotes the way ‗things are
around here’. Climate could also be described as
organisations‘ members‘ perception of the organisations
offerings (Erwee et al., 2001; Peek, 2003; Mullins, 2007)
and could potentially influence behavior in an
organisation (Castro and Martins, 2010: 2). Koberg and
Chusmir (1987: 397) had said that favourable work
outcomes were a function of how well people‘s needs or
personalities were matched by a number of workenvironment variables, which included the culture of an
organisation.
The aforementioned thus suggest that the concepts are
used interchangeably. Both concepts are however
constantly challenged by the external environment (Nair,
2006; Castro and Martins, 2010) and therefore
9661
susceptible to change dynamics (Lussier, 2000; Schultz
et al., 2003). O‘Rourke (2007: 32) adds that many
organisations rely on a particular culture for their daily
operations and as a result employees must not expect
the existing climate to change for them rather they must
adapt to the climate.
This study utilised the terms – organisational culture
and organisational climate - interchangeably.
Castro and Martins (2010) report a very strong positive
relationship between organisational climate and
employee satisfaction. Their study detected very close
proximity between the dimensions of organisational
climate perceived as personal to the individual and job
satisfaction. However, the dimensions perceived as
indirectly affecting the job satisfaction of individuals also
contributed significantly to employee satisfaction.
Organisational climate is defined in many ways by
several authors and researchers as referring to a set of
values, beliefs and behaviour patterns that form the core
identity of the organisation (Schultz et al., 2003; Grobler
et al., 2006). These then help in shaping the employees‘
behaviour (Erwee et al., 2001: 7).
Elton Mayo‘s 1933 work on Western Electric (cited in
Castro and Martins, 2010:1) commenced the varied
interest in organisational climate. Since then researchers
have focused on how employees‘ perceptions of their
global work environment influence not only productivity
but also their levels of satisfaction.
Essentially, studies have shown that no matter the
dimension of organisational climate that is examined,
results have consistently shown that organisational
climate has an influence on employee satisfaction (Peek,
2003).
Positive organisational climate supports productivity,
keeps the organisation on a sound competitive front and
persuades
employees
to
maintain
acceptable
organisational behaviour.
The different organisational culture dimensions and
their interaction with this study‘s objectives are presented
in Table 1.
Demographic variables and employee satisfaction
Many studies (Stamps et al., 1978; Sarker et al., 2003;
Kavanaugh et al., 2006; Patterson et al., 2009) have
indicated a close association between demographic
variables of healthcare professionals and job satisfaction.
This interest in healthcare professional‘s job satisfaction has arisen due to a number of factors namely the
strategic importance of the healthcare professional in
disease control initiatives (Marchal and kegels, 2003: 89),
the need to retain healthcare professionals (Kavanaugh
et al., 2006: 304); and the need to stem the tide of
professional nurses‘ migration to developed economies
(Jacobs and Roodt, 2008: 64). Roos and Van Eeden
(2008: 54) capture the significance of a study into
9662
Afr. J. Bus. Manage.
Table 1. The different organisational culture dimensions and their interaction with the current study‘s objectives.
Jacobs and Roodts
(2008) organisational
culture dimensions
Goal clarity; identification
with the organization
Castro and Martins
(2010) organisational
climate dimensions
The various organizational culture dimensions and
their interaction with the objectives of this study
Trust; Communication
Right attitudes and behaviours from leadership produce
trust and better alignment with organizational goals
Democratic functioning of the organization with full
opportunities for participation; A sense of identity with,
and loyal to, the organization and a feeling of being a
valued and important member
Employee participation
Team work
Work groups that serve as support systems create an
enabling environment for growth thereby reducing
turnover and absenteeism.
Recognition of people‘s needs and expectations at work,
and individual differences and attributes
Task structure
Work environment
A job excites if it has a good degree of autonomy, proper
skill utilization, task variety as well as advancement
opportunities
Performance orientation
Performance
management
Organisation members retention possibilities are
enhanced by unlimited career development opportunities
based on among others, equitable performance
management
Mullins (2007) organisational culture dimensions
Integration of goals
Opportunities for personal development and career
progression
Managerial behavior and styles of leadership appropriate
to the particular work situations
Management style
Leadership
Managers play leading roles in issues that affect
employees. They provide opportunity for participation in
decision making and also assign tasks on the basis of
the degree of maturity of employees
Justice in treatment with equitable Human Resource
Management (HRM) and employment relations practices
and policies; mutual trust, consideration and support
among different levels of the organization
Reward orientation
Remuneration and reward
Poor pay and inequitable remuneration attract feelings of
insecurity, less motivation and consequently turnover,
absenteeism and poor productivity
Concern for job design and work-life balance
Human resource
orientation
Employee wellness
An environment that provides organisation‘s members
with task clarity, opportunity to distress is said to have a
conducive work environment.
employee satisfaction beyond the realm of the
healthcare professional –
“Against the background of increasing local and
global competitiveness, it is crucial for any
organisation, particularly for those in developing
countries with limited resources, such as South
Africa, to ensure that it consistently develops and
retains a loyal, committed and able workforce”.
Demographic variables include age, gender,
family size, family life cycle, income, occupation,
religion, race and education (Cronje et al., 2006:
303). These variables are also used to explain
organisation‘s diversity (Smit et al., 2007: 240).
Grobler et al. (2006: 76) divide these variables
into two – primary and secondary dimensions.
Primary dimensions include age, gender,
Iwu et al.
ethnicity, race, physical abilities/qualities and sexual
orientation. They are those human differences that are
inborn and that exert a major impact on human beings.
Secondary dimensions add depth and individuality to our
lives and they include education, geographical location,
income, marital status, military experience and parental
status.
Martin and Roodt (2008: 28) found a significant
relationship between demographic variables and organisational commitment. Commitment to the organisation
increases as age increases they say. This study enjoys
the support of previous works such as James and Jones
(1980); Mathieu and Zajac (1990); and Sarker et al.
(2003). James and Jones (1980: 127) argue that job
satisfaction seems to increase with age, which may
suggest a more realistic adjustment to the work situation
or less mobility. Mathieu and Zajac (1990) insist that the
longer a worker stays with an organisation, the better his
promotional opportunities as well as income and if this is
the case, then it can be argued that he will be more
satisfied with his job. The majority of studies on the
relationship between age and job satisfaction have found
some association between employee‘s age and job
satisfaction (Sarker et al., 2003: 745, 746). These
researchers contend that organisational tenure is a
covariate of age, where both have been found to
influence an individual‘s job satisfaction, thus, age and
organisational tenure are usually highly correlated with
each other. The researchers found that while there was a
significant relationship between tenure and facets of
satisfaction, the effect of tenure on satisfaction was
significantly modified by age. Thus, according to the
researchers, tenure and age need to be considered
simultaneously for better understanding of their effect on
the level of job satisfaction. The only positive and
significant correlation (Smerek and Peterson, 2007: 245)
found was between length of service and the work itself.
There is a close association between age, race and
turnover as well as commitment to an organisation. As
one aged, intentions to stay are improved. This is the
argument of Sarker et al. (2003) and Okpara (2004).
Broadly these researchers claim that older workers place
more investment within an organisation, hence their
intention to stay longer. In the findings of Sarker et al.
(2003: 752, 755) tenure has a positive effect on the job
satisfaction level. Their study indicated a rise in
satisfaction with fringe benefits for the 11 to 20 years
tenure group. Okpara (2004: 335) found that older
managers and those with longer organisational tenure in
the work place have higher levels of job satisfaction than
younger workers and those with shorter organisational
tenure.
Several studies (Okpara, 2004, 2006; Okpara et al.,
2004) have shown the closeness of job satisfaction to the
education dimension of demography. Education and
experience combined contributed significantly to
satisfaction with pay which to some extent indicated that
62% of the variance in pay satisfaction could be
9663
accounted for by education, and experience among other
variables. Well educated employees tend to lower
commitment especially if they perceive the organisation
as not necessarily supporting them. Other studies
(Mathieu and Zajac, 1990; Martin and Roodt, 2008)
support this submission. A higher academic qualification
resulting in more job opportunities and task diversity tend
to promote job satisfaction.
Okpara‘s (2006) revealed that there were gender
differences in promotion. Male managers were overall
more satisfied with their company promotion policies than
their female counterparts. Govender (2006: 99, 100)
found to the contrary that there were no significant
differences between married and unmarried healthcare
providers at a military establishment in South Africa.
However, within emergency medical services, Patterson
et al. (2009: 86) reported that approximately six percent
of their sample indicated that they would not spend more
than a year within the profession. This intention to leave
was tightly linked to, among other factors, gender.
In a study of work satisfaction of medical doctors in the
South African private health sector, Pillay (2008: 259)
reported a close association between gender, age, group
practice and overall satisfaction. Pillay noted that certain
female doctors reacted positively or otherwise on the
basis of years of practice, group interaction and presence
of incentives. Having practiced for twenty years or more
in groups of more than six doctors and received
incentives, female doctors were significantly more
satisfied than their colleagues who have fewer years of
practice without a commensurate amount of group
practice support, Pillay adds.
Govender‘s (2006) study also disclosed that concerns
were raised by healthcare workers who had children.
Family size and family responsibility reacted negatively to
job satisfaction. While the military provides support for
families that are separated by their breadwinners, the fact
that individuals will be separated from their children for
extended periods of time would have a negative impact
on family life and thus lead to greater levels of
dissatisfaction. Demographic variables no doubt help in
confirming distinctions of correlations amongst employees regarding certain characteristic dimensions.
RESEARCH DESIGN
Research design refers to a plan or blueprint which specifies how
data relating to a given problem should be collected and analysed
(Nworgu, 1991). A descriptive survey design was utilised in this
study. Nwankwo (1994) argues that the purpose of a descriptive
survey method is used to describe all the facts, qualities,
characteristics of a given population, event or area of interest
systematically and as factually and accurately as possible to
answer the questions asked by the problem under investigation.
Data collection
The instrument which was utilized for data collection was the
9664
Afr. J. Bus. Manage.
Table 2. Categories in the data collection instrument.
S/N (categories)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Categories in the data collection instrument
Organisational design
Individual job characteristics
Co-worker relations
Culture/work environment
Senior management
Direct supervisor
Work processes
Communication
Technology
Customer satisfaction
Remuneration
revised closed-ended Plus Delta Organisational Climate
Questionnaire. This instrument was utilized because it is
condensed; and, according to De Cock (2006), combines facets of
job satisfaction with organisational climate dimensions. Plus Delta
Consulting, author of the Organisational Climate Questionnaire
confirm the following: It is an ideal tool to help management to
better understand how employees think and feel as contributing
members of their organisations. With an accurate picture of their
attitudes, management will be able to create an action plan with
specific solutions that address any areas of concern or in need of
improvement.
The preliminary literature review, as well as casual interaction
with some members of health-related professions revealed six
primary components of occupational satisfaction dimensions of
clinical and non-clinical health professionals. These dimensions
included compensation, nature of work (prestige/status), autonomy,
task requirements, growth opportunity, and support team
(illuminating the essence of co-worker relationships and
cooperative environment). These components relate to both the job
content and job context environments. Both these environments
have an effect on an organisation‘s climate (Nel et al., 2008: 17).
These components are also almost similar to Van Saane et al.‘s
(2003: 194, 197) work factors, which they insist meet the quality
criteria, as well as content validity that are relevant to employee
satisfaction studies. The facets of job satisfaction, as well as the
dimensions of organisational climate were considered as germane
to the research objectives, which firstly motivated the choice of the
Plus Delta Organisational Climate Questionnaire and, consequently
influenced the consideration to modify the Plus Delta Organisational
Climate Questionnaire.
The questionnaire comprised two sections, namely: (1) the
demographic information questionnaire; and (2) the modified
version of the Plus Delta Organisational Climate questionnaire.
Section 2 had 11 categories, which represented dimensions of
organisational climate, as well as job satisfaction facets (See Table
2). Of the 11 categories, 9 had 5 items each, while only two
categories had 4 items each. Respondents were asked to rate, by
using a five-point Likert scale on how they found each situation (53
in total). The five-point Likert scale ranged from (1) ―strongly
disagree‖ to (5) ―strongly agree‖.
The motivation to adapt the Plus Delta Organisational Climate
Questionnaire did not exclude the instrument from a rigorous
validity and reliability test. Every research instrument must be
assessed prior to use for both validity and reliability purposes
(NNSDO, 2005: 1) in order for the instrument to prudently measure
what it set out to measure (Coetzee and Schreuder, 2010: 125),
and also to lend some credibility to the findings of a study (Welman
et al., 2005: 145). The reliability of the data collection instrument
was tested by using the Cronbach Alpha coefficient. Each of the
categories was separately tested, achieving an acceptable score
(>0.9). Given this result, the instrument was deemed sufficient for
the study. Researchers such as Chen et al. (2006: 490) state that a
reliability coefficient, which exceeds 0.8 for any test or scale, was
the minimum acceptable reliability coefficient.
Analysis
The researchers took initial step to explore all the items in the
categories and then determined their degree of connectedness or
otherwise. This is referred to as exploratory factor analysis, which is
performed in order to understand how many factors exist among a
set of variables (Zikmund et al., 2010: 593). Following this, a
rotated component matrix (A) (Table 10). The rotated component
matrix was also important because it helped to identify the most
interpretable and meaningful structure of the groups of variables
(Leong and Austin, 2006: 251). Kline (1994: 7) adds that in
exploratory analysis, the aim is to explore the field, to deliver the
main constructs or dimensions … [essentially to ask] what
constructs or dimensions account for correlations [in a study]‘.
From the rotated component matrix (A), it was then necessary to
group together all the items with high correlation to each other.
From the grouped items emerged new factors. Each factor was
then labelled differently. The new factors are role clarification and
job design; equitable performance management; and integrated
leadership and knowledge sharing. The others include self-efficacy;
family-friendly work environments (FFWE‘s), leader credibility and
innovation and excellent customer relations and technology. These
new factors represent a significant component of the model of
employee satisfaction amongst the health-related professionals in
South Africa.
Tables 3 to 9 present the frequency statistics of the participants‘
demographics.
DISCUSSION OF
SATISFACTION
THE
MODEL
OF
EMPLOYEE
Empirical findings from this study indicate that role clarity
and job design were critical in explaining reasons for this
study‘s objectives. Previous studies provide eminent
support in this regard.
Iwu et al.
Table 3. Gender of respondents.
Parameter
Male
Valid
Female
Total
Frequency
62
55
117
Percent
53.0
47.0
100.0
Valid percent
53.0
47.0
100.0
Cumulative percent
53.0
100.0
Table 4. Age of respondent.
Parameter
Frequency
8
38
59
12
117
21-30 years
31-40 years
41-50 years
51-60 years
Total
Valid
Percent
6.8
32.5
50.4
10.3
100.0
Valid percent
6.8
32.5
50.4
10.3
100.0
Cumulative percent
6.8
39.3
89.7
100.0
Table 5. Marital status of respondent.
Parameter
Valid
Single
Married
Separated
Total
Frequency
16
88
13
117
Percent
13.7
75.2
11.1
100.0
Valid percent
13.7
75.2
11.1
100.0
Cumulative percent
13.7
88.9
100.0
Table 6. Household annual income.
Parameter
Valid
Frequency
1
1
90
23
2
117
Less than R100 000
R101 000-R200 000
R201 000-R300 000
R301 000-R400 000
R401 000-R500 000
Total
Percent
.9
.9
76.9
19.7
1.7
100.0
Valid percent
.9
.9
76.9
19.7
1.7
100.0
Cumulative percent
.9
1.7
78.6
98.3
100.0
Table 7. Ethnic groups of respondents.
Parameter
Valid
African
White
Indian
Coloured
Asian
Others
Total
Frequency
28
50
9
28
1
1
117
Percent
23.9
42.7
7.7
23.9
.9
.9
100.0
Valid percent
23.9
42.7
7.7
23.9
.9
.9
100.0
Cumulative percent
23.9
66.7
74.4
98.3
99.1
100.0
9665
9666
Afr. J. Bus. Manage.
Table 8. Educational levels of respondents.
Valid
National Diploma/Bachelor Degree
B.Tech/Honours/Postgraduate Diploma
Master Degree
Doctorate Degree
Total
Frequency
8
103
4
2
117
Percent
6.8
88.0
3.4
1.7
100.0
Valid percent
6.8
88.0
3.4
1.7
100.0
Cumulative percent
6.8
94.9
98.3
100.0
Table 9. Tenure.
Parameter
Valid
Less than 5 years
6-10 years
11-15 years
16-20 years
21-25
Total
Frequency
47
40
17
10
3
117
For instance Albion et al. (2008: 279) warn that role
clarity was the only organisational climate variable that
emerged in their study as a unique contributor to the
formation of intentions to leave the health profession.
There is also an urgent call by Rowe et al. (2005) for
health care establishments to improve role clarity. A welldesigned job improves the psychological meaningfulness
of a role and is, according to Bakker and Demerouti
(2007) cited in Xu and Thomas (2010: 401), associated
with high work standards. Tenure, race and age were the
demographic variables that interacted positively with this
factor.
It was also the contention of this study that equitable
performance management would prevent health-related
professionals from looking elsewhere (outside the country
or in other sectors) for greener pastures.
Health-related personnel would be comfortable in an
environment where both senior management and direct
supervisors show appreciation for one‘s work either
through the provision of helpful feedback, or through welldefined structures with policies, procedures and systems
that allow employees to achieve personal and organisational goals. This factor had a positive relationship with
income, tenure, race and age.
The factor–integrated leadership and knowledge
sharing–typifies a work environment where senior
management encourages collaboration across all levels;
where individuals appreciate the personal contribution of
their peers (without any form of negative attitude); and
where individuals are consulted to participate in matters
that affect them.
The factor–self-efficacy-draws inspiration from the
argument that health-related personnel function better if
Percent
40.2
34.2
14.5
8.5
2.6
100.0
Valid percent
40.2
34.2
14.5
8.5
2.6
100.0
Cumulative percent
40.2
74.4
88.9
97.4
100.0
they have a high sense of worthiness in and /or a belief in
their capabilities to manage responsibilities. This will
come from health-related personnel who are valued as
employees; receiving meaningful remuneration and
feeling that management treats them fairly.
Employers of health-related personnel must be able to
show care, interest and empathy towards employees.
They should also be able to explain what is expected of
health-related professionals, as well as provide regular
and positive feedback and recognition for work well done.
Income, tenure and race were the demographic variables
that had a significant relationship with this factor.
There is an abundance of empirical evidence that
family responsive workplaces reduce absenteeism, intent
to leave the organisation as well as stress and conflict.
Family-friendly work environments are characterized by
flexible work arrangements and child-care and exercise
facilities.
They are essentially a more fluid environment where
health-related professionals experience a sense of
community. Family-friendly work environment was found
to have a positive relationship with income, tenure and
race. Leader credibility and innovation extends the
thinking of previous researchers who recommended
transformational leadership, and provision of quality
service by using adequate technology.
This factor gives impetus to the model of employee
satisfaction because it recognizes the influence of poor
technology on the quality of service delivery.
This factor also argues that the ability of the leader to
give helpful feedback also helps to generate some
confidence in the employee that he is dealing with a
competent superior.
Iwu et al.
9667
Table 10. Rotated component matrix.
Parameter
1
Component= Factors or possible underlying constructs
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0.860
-0.380
V1
The organisation's goals and objectives are clear to me.
V2
Employees have a shared understanding of what the organisation is
supposed to do
0.315
V3
V4
Roles and responsibilities within the groups are understood
Clear reporting structures have been established
0.843
0.410
V5
Employees at this organisation have the right skill sets to perform
their job functions
0.424
V6
V7
V8
V9
V10
V11
I derive satisfaction from my current job responsibilities
My skills and abilities are fully utilised in my current job
I have the opportunity to further develop my skills and abilities
I find my current role challenging
My work adds value to the organisation
I feel my input is valued by my peers.
V12
Knowledge and information sharing are group norms across the
organization.
0.684
0.461
V13
V14
Employees consult each other when they need support.
Individuals appreciate the personal contributions of their peers.
0.835
0.870
0.379
V15
When disagreements occur, they are addressed promptly in order
to resolve them.
0.745
V16
V17
V18
V19
V20
V21
I feel valued as an employee.
I enjoy being part of this organization.
Employees have a good balance between work and personal life.
Morale is high across the organization.
Employees speak highly about this organization.
Senior management sets high standards.
V22
Senior management encourages collaboration across the
organization.
V23
V24
V25
V26
V27
V28
V29
V30
V31
V32
V33
V34
V35
V36
Senior management treats employees fairly.
I trust the information I receive from senior management.
I believe senior management appreciates the work I do.
My direct supervisor gives me helpful feedback on how to be more
effective.
My direct supervisor listens to my ideas and concerns.
10
0.650
-0.304
0.391
0.651
0.556
0.554
0.618
0.344
0.617
0.630
0.604
0.916
0.651
0.316
0.566
0.826
0.316
0.566
0.416
0.311
0.651
0.860
0.745
0.416
0.853
0.826
-0.374
-0.384
0.843
0.311
0.311
0.816
0.826
0.916
0.324
0.781
0.856
My direct supervisor serves as a positive role model for me.
I believe my direct supervisor appreciates the work I do.
I am clear on how best to perform my work tasks
0.625
0.859
Work tasks are completed on time
0.860
We use efficient work processors when performing our jobs
0.860
0.635
9668
Afr. J. Bus. Manage.
Table 10. cont‘d
V37
V38
V39
V40
V41
V42
V43
V44
V45
V46
V47
V48
V49
V50
V51
V52
V53
When I need help, I can ask others in my work group for suggestions or ideas
0.842
Our face-to-face meetings are productive
My department has adequate tools and technologies to perform our work
The technology we use supports our business processes
The technology we use helps me get my job done.
The tools and technologies that I use help me to be efficient in my completing
my work
Our technology is reliable and works when we need it to work.
We understand the specific needs of our customers.
We are focused on delivering high quality services.
We deliver our service on time.
Our services meet our customer’s expectations
The income I receive is enough to provide for my basic needs
The income I receive is adequate for normal expenses
The income I receive is not less than I deserve
The income I receive fits my social standing
0.745
It, therefore, behoves the superior to act in a manner that
lends trust in his competence to lead. To gain the trust of
employees, managers must be seen to be knowledgeable in their work, caring of employees and
approachable. The consequence of credible leadership is
reduced tension and better handling of work roles. This
factor showed close association with tenure, race, and
marital status. To achieve world class excellence in
service and also meet and possibly exceed customers‘
expectations, health care establishments must understand the specific needs of their customers. To do this,
however, requires functional tools and technologies that
support health-related employees to complete their work.
Health-related establishments are technology-driven and,
as a result, must have technology that supports their
business processes. The factor - excellent customer
relations and effective technology - argues in support of a
model of employee satisfaction for health-related
professions in South Africa. Race was the only demographic variable found to have a positive relationship with
this factor.
Reporting on Kanter‘s (1994) findings, Lee and Teo
(2005: 28) submit that positive organisational behaviour
is supported by work environments that provide access to
information, resources, and an opportunity to learn and
develop. Essentially, Lee and Teo argue that supervisory
receptiveness to employee problems is a strong driver of
employee satisfaction. The model of employee satisfaction realised by this study is presented in figure 2.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Several factors plague an organisation‘s successful
0.367
0.416
0.777
0.953
0.953
0.953
0.777
0.750
0.311
0.803
0.646
0.736
0.867
0.734
0.686
0.626
0.393
realisation of its aim to exist. These factors reside both
within and outside the organisation. Some of the external
factors include political culture of the area(s) in which the
organisation does business; the economic climate of the
area in which it does business, including its social
dynamics; and the technology that is required to execute
its numerous tasks and activities. Internal factors can
include a mismatch between an employee and the job he
does, a lack of shared knowledge of what the organisation is about; poor leadership; unequal performance
management systems; unclear roles; and a frustrating
structure.
This study has interacted with the aforementioned
elements, and has built a strong case for the internal
factors. This study also indicated, to a reasonable
degree, that the antecedents to organisational effectiveness include an acknowledgement of factors such as
income, working conditions, collegiate work environment,
opportunities for advancement on the job (and career)
and a common knowledge of an organisation‘s reason for
existing. It is prudent to mention that these factors
interact differently with demographic factors such as
tenure, race, marital status and age.
The model of employee satisfaction lends credence to
the aforementioned. It is, therefore, necessary to state
that comparative competitiveness can be achieved
through a healthy and committed workforce that is
provided with a collegial environment, supportive leadership, clear and unambiguous roles, as well as an
environment that does not add to the pressures of daily
existence.
This study has argued that when an environment
described earlier is made available, health related
employees provide excellent customer service, are happy
Iwu et al.
9669
Figure 2. Model of employee satisfaction.
to retain their employment, and commit more to the
organisation‘s growth. Adhering to the model would
deliver the right rewards to the health-related professions
in South Africa, specifically the Western Province.
This study is the first of its kind on the basis that it
makes explicit links between job satisfaction facets and
organisational climate dimensions. Given that no study of
this nature existed apriori, and for purposes of furthering
this study, the researchers suggest that (1) the population
be enlarged, and (2) a data collection instrument should
be distilled from the model.
REFERENCES
Albion MJ, Fogarty GJ, Machin MA, Patrick J (2008). Predicting
absenteeism and turnover intentions in the health professions.
Austral. Health Rev. 32(2):271-281.
Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2007). The Job demands-resources model:
state of the art. J. Manag. Psychol. 22(3):309-328.
Bowling NA, Hendricks EA, Wagner SH (2008). Positive and negative
affectivity and facet satisfaction: A Meta-analysis. J. Bus. Psychol.
23:115-125.
Castro M, Martins N (2010). The relationship between organisational
climate and employee satisfaction in a South African information and
technology organisation. SA J. Ind. Psychol. 36(1), Art. #800, 9
pages. DOI: 10.4102/sajip.v36i1.800.
Chen S, Yang C, Shiau J, Wang H (2006). The development of an
employee satisfaction model for higher education. TQM Mag.
18(5):484-500.
Coetzee M, Schreuder D (2010). Personnel Psychology. An Applied
Perspective. Cape Town: Oxford.
Cronje GJ, du Toit GS, Motlatla MDC, Marais A (2006). Introduction to
Business Management. (6th ed.). Cape Town: Oxford.
De Cock C (2006). A Creativity Model for the Analysis of Continuous
Improvement Programmes: A Suggestion to Make Continuous
Improvement Continuous. Creativity Innov. Manag., 2(3):156-165.
Demand Media. Inc. (n.d). Role of a radiographer. Retrieved from
http://www.ehow.com/about_5087423_role-radiographer.html. March
24, 2010.
Denison D (1996). What is the difference between organisational culture
and organisational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of
paradigm wars. Acad. Manag. Rev. 21(3):619-654.
EFQM (1991), EFQM model for business excellence. european
foundation
for
quality
management.
Retrieved
from
http://www.efqm.org/en/tabid/132/default.aspx.
Ellickson MC, Logsdon K (2002). Determinants of job satisfaction of
municipal government employees. Public Pers. Manag. 31(3):343358.
Erwee R, Lynch B, Millet B, Smith D, Roodt G (2001). Cross cultural
equivalence of the organisational culture survey in Australia. SA J.
9670
Afr. J. Bus. Manage.
Ind. Psychol. 27(3):7-12.
Fox RC, Aiken LH, Messikomer CM (1990). The Culture of Caring:
AIDS and the Nursing Profession. Milbank Q., 68, Supplement 2
(Part 2):226-256.
Govender V (2006). Job satisfaction among healthcare professionals in
Area Military Health unit, KwaZulu Natal. Unpublished M.BA thesis.
University of KwaZulu Natal.
Grobler PA, Warnich S, Carrell MR, Elbert NF, Hatfield RD (2006).
Human Resource Management in South Africa. (3rd ed.). London:
Thomson Learning.
Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1975). Development of the job diagnostic
survey. J. Appl. Psychol. 60(2):159-170.
Jacobs E, Roodt G (2008). Organisational culture of hospitals to predict
turnover intentions of professional nurses. Health SA Gesondheid,
13:1-65.
James LR, Jones AP (1980). Perceived job characteristics and job
satisfaction: an examination of reciprocal causation. Pers. Psychol.
33:97-135.
Kano, N. (Ed.). (1996). Why is TQM necessary in the service sector? In:
Kano, Noriaki, Guide to TQM in service industries. Tokyo: Asian
Productivity Organization. 80-113.
Kavanaugh J, Duffy JA, Lilly J (2006). The relationship between job
satisfaction and demographic variables for healthcare professionals.
Manag. Res. News 29(6):304-325.
Kline P (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge.
Koberg CS, Chusmir LH (1987). Organizational culture relationships
with creativity and other job-related variables. J. Bus. Res. 15:397409.
Lee G, Teo A (2005). Organizational restructuring: Impact on trust and
work satisfaction. Asia Pacific J. Manag. 22:23-39.
Leong FTL, Austin JT (2006). The Psychology Research Handbook. A
Guide for Graduate Students and Research Assistants. (2nd ed.).
London: SAGE.
Lussier RN (2000). Management fundamentals. Concepts, applications,
skill development. Australia: South-Western College.
Marchal B, Kegels G (2003). Health workforce imbalances in times of
globalization: brain drain or professional mobility? Int. J. Health Plan.
Manag. 18:89-101.
Martin A, Roodt G (2008). Perceptions of organisational commitment,
job satisfaction and turnover intentions in a post-merger South
African tertiary institution. SA J. Ind. Psychol. 34(1):23-31.
Mathieu JE, Zajac DM (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the
antecedents, correlates and consequences of organisational
commitment. Psychol. Bull. 108:171-194.
Mearns KJ, Flin R (1999). Assessing the State of Organizational Safety
- Culture or Climate? Curr. Psychol. 18(1):5-17.
Millidot M (2004). Dictionary of Optometry and Visual Science. (6th ed.).
China: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Mullins LJ (2007). Management and Organisational Behaviour. (8th
ed.). London: Pearson.
Nair A (2006). Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality
management practices and firm performance: Implications for quality
management theory development. J. Oper. Manag. 24(6):948–975.
Nel PS, Werner A, Haasbroek GD, Poisat P, Sono T, Schultz HB
(2008). Human Resources Management. (7th ed.). Cape Town:
Oxford.
NNSDO (2005). Validating research instruments. Retrieved from
https://www.nnsdo.org/dmdocuments/ValidatingResearchInstruments
.pdf. July 1, 2011.
Nwankwo JC (1994). Mastering research in education and social
science. Ibadan: Claverianum.
Nworgu BG (1991). Educational research: Basic issues and
methodology. Ibadan: Wisdom Publishers.
O‘Rourke JS (2007). Management communication: a case-analysis
approach. New Jersey: Pearson.
Okpara JO (2004). Personal characteristics as predictors of job
satisfaction. An exploratory study of IT managers in a developing
economy. Infor. Technolo. People 17(3):327-338.
Okpara JO (2006). Gender and the relationship between perceived
fairness in pay, promotion and job satisfaction in a sub-Saharan
African economy. Women Manag. Rev. 21(3):224-240.
Okpara JO, Squillace M, Erondu EE (2004). Gender differences and job
satisfaction: a study of university teachers in the United States.
Women Manag. Rev. 20(3):177-190.
Oxford Concise Medical Dictionary 2007.
Patterson PD, Moore CG, Sanddal NO, Wingrove G, La Croix B (2009).
Characterizing job satisfaction and intent to leave among Nationally
Registered Emergency Medical Technicians: An analysis of the 2005
LEADS survey. J. Allied Health 38(3):84-91.
Peek RC (2003). The relationship between organizational climate and
job satisfaction as reported by industrial research staff at Florida
Community College. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of
Florida, Gainsville.
Pillay R (2008). Work satisfaction of medical doctors in the South
African private health sector. J. Health Organ. Manag. 22(3):254-268.
Pohlmann C (1999). Study on workplace satisfaction in private, public
sectors. Retrieved from http://www.cfib.ca/research/reports/aspects_
e.asp.
Price JL, Mueller CW (1986). Absenteeism and turnover of hospital
employees. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Reichers A, Schneider B (1990). Climate and culture: an evolution of
constructs. In B. Schneider (Ed.) Organizational climate and culture:
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 5-39.
Robbins SP, Judge TA, Odendaal A, Roodt G (2009). Organisational
Behaviour. Global and Southern African Perspectives. Cape Town:
Pearson.
Roos W, van Eeden R (2008). The relationship between employee
motivation, job satisfaction and corporate culture. SA J. Ind. Psychol.
34(1):54-63.
Rowe AK, de Savigny D, Lanata CF, Victoria CG (2005). How can we
achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in
low-resource settings? Lancet 366:1026-1035.
Royal Pharmaceutical Society (nd). What do pharmacists do? Available
at http://www.rpharms.com/ipharmacist/what-do-pharmacists-do-.asp.
Sarker SJ, Crossman A, Chinmeteepituck P (2003). The relationships of
age and length of service with job satisfaction: an examination of
hotel employees in Thailand. J. Manag. Psychol. 18(7):745-758.
Saunders L (1954). The changing role of nurses. Am. J. Nurs.
54:1094-1098.
Schultz H, Bagraim J, Potgeiter T, Viedge C, Werner A (2006).
Organisational behaviour: A contemporary South African Perspective.
Cape Town: Van Schaik.
Sempane ME, Rieger HS, Roodt G (2002). Job satisfaction in relation to
organizational culture. SA J. Ind. Psychol. 28(2):23-30.
Smerek RE, Peterson M (2007). Examining Herzberg‘s theory:
Improving job satisfaction among non-academic employees at a
university. Res. Higher Educ. 48(2):229-250.
Smit PJ, Cronje GJ, de J, Brevis T, Vrba MJ (2007). Management
Principles. A contemporary edition for Africa. (4th ed.). Cape Town:
Juta.
Stamps PL, Piemont EB, Slavitt DB, Haase AM (1978). Measurement
of work satisfaction among health professionals. Med. Care 16(4).
U.S National Library of Medicine. (nd). Emergency Medical Services.
Retrieved
from
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/emergencymedicalservices.html.
United Kingdom (2010). Scientific laboratory technician. Job description.
Retrieved
from
http://www.prospects.ac.uk/scientific_laboratory_technician_job_desc
ription.htm.
Van Saane N, Sluiter JK, Verbeek JH, Frings-Dresen MH (2003).
Reliability and validity of instruments measuring job satisfaction—A
systematic review. Occupa. Med. 53(3):191-200.
Volkwein JF, Parmley K (2000). Comparing administrative satisfaction
in public and private universities. Res. Higher Educ. 41(1):95-116.
Weiss HM (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating
evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences. Hum. Resour. Manag.
Rev. 12:173-194.
Welman C, Kruger F, Mitchell B (2005). Research methodology. (3rd
ed.). Cape Town: Oxford.