Revista Linguagem & Ensino
https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/ojs2/index.php/rle/index
Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, ABR-JUN (2020)
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as
a Second Language
Rosane Silveira1
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj2
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Inglês, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil
Abstract: This article reports on the design and adaptation of a task cycle (SKEHAN, 1996; 1998)
originally designed by student-teachers attending a workshop on teaching Portuguese to
speakers of other languages. The original task was adapted by the researchers having in mind
a group of pre-intermediate immigrants attending Portuguese classes. The data consisted of
field notes made by the authors while the student-teachers were conceiving the task cycle,
the original and the adapted tasks. We observed that, even though the Task-Based Approach
seems to be a good proposal to expand and improve the Communicative Approach to
language teaching, the design of tasks can be challenging, in particular the idea of the
outcome for a language task and the maintenance of a coherent focus among the different
subtasks that compose a task cycle. Nevertheless, the task cycle analyzed in this paper, with
adaptations to the teaching context, was successfully used in the classroom.
Keywords: Task-Based Approach; Material design; Portuguese as a Second Language; Teacher Education.
Título: O uso de tarefas no ensino de português como segunda língua
Resumo: Este artigo relata a elaboração e a implementação de um ciclo de tarefas (SKEHAN, 1996;
1998), originalmente concebido por três alunos-professores que frequentavam uma oficina
sobre o ensino do Português para falantes de outras línguas. As tarefas originais foram
adaptadas pelas pesquisadoras tendo como inspiração um grupo de imigrantes de nível préintermediário matriculados em um curso de português da instituição. Os dados consistem em
notas de campo feitas pelas autoras enquanto os alunos-professores concebiam o ciclo de
tarefas original e as tarefas adaptadas. Pudemos observar que o design de tarefas pode ser
desafiador, em particular a ideia de que deve haver um outcome (produto) para uma tarefa
de linguagem e a manutenção de um enfoque coerente entre as diferentes subtarefas.
Apesar desses desafios, o ciclo de tarefas analisado neste artigo, com adaptações ao contexto
de ensino, pôde ser utilizado com sucesso em sala de aula.
1
Doutora em Letras-Inglês (UFSC), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina/CNPq. Orcid: http://orcid.org/00000003-0329-0376.
E-mail: rosanesilveira@hotmail.com
2
Doutora em Letras-Inglês (UFSC), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-00022560-2919.
E-mail: donesca@hotmail.com
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
Palavras-chave: Abordagem Baseada em Tarefas; Elaboração de materiais; Português como segunda
língua; Formação de professores.
Introduction
In our experience as teacher-educators in Brazil, we often encounter students who are
eager to gain experience teaching Portuguese to speakers of other languages. Generally, these
are individuals who are pursuing or who hold a degree in a foreign language or in Portuguese as
a mother tongue. The perspective of teaching their first language (Portuguese) motivates them,
but, at the same time, the challenge of knowing what and how to teach is always present at the
initial stages. Every time we offer a workshop or a course addressing the teaching of Portuguese
to speakers of other languages, we observe how language students, some of them with
experience regarding second/foreign language teaching, tend to focus on grammar items as a
point of departure to teach Portuguese as a second language in the Brazilian context. This
recurrent observation inspired us to propose a workshop on how the Task-Based Approach
(TBA) could be an alternative to implement the teaching of Portuguese having language use and
successful communication as the central goals, rather than a narrow focus on language
structure.
We side with Ellis (2003) who explains that though a relationship between research and
pedagogy where the researchers dictate the most effective means for teachers to achieve their
aims is not desirable, research can inform language pedagogy in many ways, such as suggesting
new ideas for teachers to experiment with in their classrooms.
The present study investigated the design and implementation of a task cycle designed
by student-teachers to be used as part of an outreach project in the field of Portuguese as Host
Language, as our target audience for teaching Portuguese consists of immigrants and refugees.
In this sense, the study addresses issues related to teacher education, material design, and TaskBased teaching. The task cycle proposed by the student-teachers was based on Skehan’s
framework for task design and implementation (1996, 1998), having in mind a specific group of
learners: immigrants, mostly refugees and asylum seekers attending Portuguese classes offered
in an extension project (PLAM – Português como Língua de Acolhimento) at Universidade
Federal de Santa Catarina.
The article is organized as follows. First, we present an overview of the Task-Based
Approach to Language Teaching, the theoretical framework informing the present study. Then,
we describe the method employed to gather data for the study, focusing on the steps followed
to design the task and to adapt it for implementation, and on the characteristics of the students
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
474
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
attending the Portuguese as a Host Language course in which the task cycle was implemented.
The third section presents the results by comparing the original task cycle and its adapted
version, and discusses major challenges in designing a task cycle. Finally, we conclude by posing
some reflections about teacher education in the field of Portuguese as a Second Language.
Overview of Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT)
In this section, we start by providing an explanation of the proposal known as the TaskBased Approach3 and how it differs from the Communicative Approach (CA). We then move on
to define what we understand by task, also comparing and contrasting this type of activity from
communicative activities. Finally, we briefly present Skehan’s proposal of a framework for the
design and implementation of tasks within a task-based cycle.
TBLT
One recurrent problem in attempts to design tasks we have encountered is the
perception that TBLT and the CA are basically the same thing. This is probably due to the fact
that TBLT and CA are both communicative approaches4. That is, both see language as social
interaction, do not have grammar as their main focus, view learning as being constructed
(rather than transmitted), see the teacher as a facilitator/mediator (rather than as a
model/provider of knowledge), welcome errors, and aim at communicative competence
(OLIVEIRA, 2014). This type of proposal for L2 teaching emerged in the 70s, after years of
language instruction through methods that focused heavily on form, with the objective of
developing, in learners, the capacity to express meanings (WIDDOWSON, 1978, in SKEHAN,
2003). For Breen (1984, in NUNAN, 2004), “when we put communication in the center, the goal
of the curriculum (learners who can communicate in the L2) and the means (classroom
procedures to achieve this goal) begin to merge: learners learn to communicate by
communicating” (p. 8). According to Ellis (2003), this shift in focus – from form to meaning –
was the result of lack of evidence that supported the more traditional methods combined with
evidence of the existence of a learner’s internal syllabus, which was not amenable to the
instruction provided by the teacher (which followed a linguistic syllabus prescribed by the
course/material designer).
3
4
Nowadays more commonly referred to as TBLT.
Others are the Project-based and the Content-based approaches, for example.
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
475
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
For this new type of instruction, there was the need to develop activities that would lead
learners to go beyond ‘knowing that’ (grammar rules), getting them to ‘know how’ (deploying
these rules to communicate) (NUNAN, 2004). Thus, a series of activities were developed so that
learners would use language in episodes of authentic communication, making the field fertile
for the emergence of communicative activities, which were later referred to as “tasks” (BYGATE;
SKEHAN; SWAIN, 2001).
Even if many authors in the past referred to meaning-based activities of the CA as ‘tasks’,
these two approaches cannot be equated. The main difference between TBLT and other
communicative approaches, including the CA, is the use of tasks as units of teaching and
learning, that is, having tasks themselves as the units for syllabus design (ROBINSON, 2001;
SKEHAN; FOSTER, 1999; WILLIS; WILLIS, 2001). Still, within TBLT itself there are different
possibilities of work which again can confound it with the CA. For example, Ellis (2003) argues
that one ‘line’ within a very broad understanding of TBLT is actually not task-based, but tasksupported. In a task-supported approach tasks are used in the place of communicative activities
in pedagogical sequences that are still similar to the presentation/practice/production (PPP)
technique. This approach is quite similar to the traditional ones, since it has a greater linguistic
focus (than the task-based one), and makes use of tasks only in moments of freer productionvery similar to what happens in the CA. The task-based approach, however, has tasks at the core
of the curriculum, with language being used in interaction and for authentic communication.
Nevertheless, even within the task-based strand there are different views on whether there can
exist tasks that ‘also’ focus on form or whether tasks should only focus on meaning5.
The description of the TBA we offer here – Nunan’s – is an encompassing one, that
brings characteristics that are common to different perspectives of this approach (that is, both
perspectives which do not see room for a focus on form in tasks and those which see this aspect
integral to a task – or at least to a cycle of tasks –, even if the main focus is on meaning and
communication). According to Nunan (2004), the principles and practices of TBLT are: to be a
needs-based approach, to propose that learning happens through interacting in the L2, to use
authentic texts, to focus on the learning process, to see learners’ personal experiences as
important, and to include both classroom language and language used outside the classroom.
We end this section by presenting in a more detailed way the specific framework which guided
the design of the cycle of tasks which was part of the present study – Skehan’s framework.
Since we have established that the major difference between TBLT and the CA (and also
other communicative approaches) is the fact that this approach has tasks as units of teaching, in
the section that follows we present the definition of task to which we subscribe.
5
Compare, for example, the frameworks of Willis and Willis (2007) and those of Skehan (1996; 1998) and Ellis
(2003).
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
476
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
Defining ‘task’
One of the main reasons why there are different frameworks for the design of tasks
and/or cycles of tasks within TBLT is the fact that different scholars have slightly different
definitions of task. In this study we follow Skehan (1998, p. 94), who defines task as an activity
where “meaning is primary, there is some communication problem to solve, there is some sort
of relationship to comparable real-world activities, task completion has some priority, and the
assessment of the task is in terms of outcome”. Willis and Willis (2001) emphasize that
“[l]anguage in a communicative task is seen as bringing about an outcome through the
exchange of meaning” (p. 173). The point we would like to stress here is the role of a
communicative outcome in tasks (something that is not necessary in a communicative activity).
To better illustrate this difference, we bring an example given by J. Willis (n/d) herself, on the
British council webpage. The rubrics of the activity is:
Figure 1 – Rubrics of the activity
Work in pairs. Talk about your grandparents. Tell each
other what you know about their past lives. Use the
phrases and patterns from the box above.
Source: Willis (n/d)
The author then goes on to explain why even though this is a communicative activity, it
is not a task. We could dismiss this activity as a task immediately, once it determines the
language the learners should use (i.e., it has a linguistic focus), but here we use this example to
illustrate what it means for an activity to have a communicative outcome. For Willis and Willis
(2007, pp. 12-14), the more confidently you can answer yes to each of the questions below, the
more task-like the activity is.
1.
Will the activity engage learners' interest?
2.
Is there a primary focus on meaning?
3.
Is there a goal or an outcome?
4.
Is success judged in terms of outcome?
5.
Is completion a priority?
6.
Does the activity relate to real world activities?'
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
477
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
For the activity presented, Willis (n/d) argued that we could probably answer yes to
questions 1 and 6, since we sometimes do talk about our grandparents (6) and usually enjoy
sharing their/our memories with other people (1). However, the answer to question 2 would
probably be ‘no’, as mentioned above, since we should use the language provided in the activity
(i.e., the purpose is much more of practicing a given linguistic structure than of sharing
memories from grandparents)6. Now, when it comes to outcome, our objective in bringing this
example, it is possible to notice that there is not a goal or purpose given for talking about
grandparents, so this would mean answering ‘no’ to question 3. Question 4 asks whether
success (in doing the task) can be judged in terms of outcome, but without an outcome there is
no way of knowing whether one has completed the task the way it was expected. Something
similar happens in relation to question 5, which asks whether (task) completion is a priority.
Without a clear outcome established, how can learners know when they have finished it? It is
not possible for learners to know when they have said enough to complete the activity and,
thus, some learners might end up saying very little.
Willis (n/d) then explains that some small changes in this communicative activity could
turn it into a task. First of all, to have learners focus on meaning, we should delete the final
instruction in the rubrics, which leads learners to a concern with using a given linguistic
structure when speaking, and not with communicating. Second, a goal or outcome should be
added, so that learners know when they have completed the task. A possible goal the author
suggests is: Try to find out three things that your grandparents' and your partner's grandparents'
lives had in common. What was the biggest difference between them? When the pair has this
answer, they have successfully reached the outcome of the task.
It is important, at this point, to bring another issue that can be misunderstood in relation
to TBLT, which is the role of form/grammar in this perspective. By re-reading the two definitions
of tasks we have offered in this section, it is possible to notice that both of them (WILLIS;
WILLIS’, 2001 and SKEHAN’S, 2003) refer to a ‘primary’ focus on meaning. That is, TBLT does not
propose a sole focus on meaning as it happened at the very beginning of the CA, when, due to
the proposal that L2 instruction started to focus on meaning rather than form, grammar often
was virtually banned from the classroom (Oliveira, 2014). On the contrary, as Willis and Willis
(2001) put it, “[m]ost current approaches to TB[L]T certainly recognize the importance of
grammar” (p. 2). What differs is the fact that explicit instruction on different linguistic structures
is not seen as a pre-requisite for language use, so these moments are expected to happen only
towards the end of a task-cycle (or even after the end of the cycle itself) (WILLIS; WILLIS, 2001).
Nunan (2004) further explains how it is possible to conciliate a focus on communication
with the acknowledgement of the importance of grammar. He states that saying that learners
6
But see Ellis’ focused tasks (ELLIS, 2003).
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
478
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
are free to use any language they have to accomplish a task does not mean implying that form is
not important. For him, “[g]rammar exists to enable the language user to express different
communicative meanings” (p. 4), and that is why at least some tasks in a cycle should attempt
to make learners focus, at least momentarily, on form7 in order to express their communicative
intentions. We side with Nunan (2004) in the understanding that grammar is a resource that
enables us to get things done, to make choices, to express ourselves as individuals, and to
articulate our feelings and attitudes.
It is for this reason that even though Skehan’s (1998) framework was used as a guide for
the task-cycle described in the present study, we will use Ellis’s (2003) definition of task, since it
explicitly addresses the role of a focus on form as well as on meaning. According to Ellis (2003),
a task is a work plan that involves primary focus on pragmatic meaning and real-world processes
of language use, focuses on one or more of the four language skills, promotes opportunities for
a focus on form, engages learners in cognitive processes, and has a defined communicative
outcome.
Finally, it is valid to bring a distinction between two types of tasks made by Nunan
(2004), so that we can clarify what we understand by a significant, meaningful, and ‘real’ use of
language. For the author, target tasks use ‘real world’ language; that is, you are reading a recipe
to your partner so that s/he can make and bake a cake, for example. However, there is another
type of task which also uses ‘real’ language - pedagogical tasks. In this case, the tasks are similar
to a target task, but they occur in the classroom, in a sort of ‘make-believe’ fashion. The
example the author gives is that of drawing a map while listening to someone describing it. Even
though the learner drawing the map might actually not have the intension of going to that place
(at least not on that specific day or in the near future), this activity is something people do in
real life and, thus, is seen as making use of meaningful language with the purpose of
communication. As it will become clear when we describe our cycle of tasks, we agree with
Nunan (2004) that this is a legitimate task.
In the last section of our theoretical background, we describe, with some detail, but not
exhaustively, Skehan’s (1996, 1998) framework for the use of tasks for L2 instruction.
This shift in focus, from meaning to form, with the purpose of expressing one’s communicative intention is what
Long (1991) termed Focus on Form, which differs from the focus on formS seen in more traditional L2 instruction,
when a specific linguistic structure was chosen and taught preemptively to be later used in ‘communication’.
7
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
479
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
Skehan’s framework for TBLT
Skehan (1996; 1998) argues that what makes his proposal different from that of other
scholars in the TBLT field is the fact that his framework was proposed based on results from
empirical research (e.g., FOSTER; SKEHAN,1996) and it takes the cognitive challenges posed by
different types of tasks into consideration (SKEHAN, 1998).
Skehan’s proposal is psycholinguistic in nature, grounded on information processing8,
and argues for the need for Focus on Form (LONG, 1991) to occur so as to allow for L2
development (SKEHAN, 1996). The rationale behind Skehan’s framework for task design is that
even though a focus on form is seen as necessary for L2 learning to happen, because of limited
attentional resources learners are not able to focus on meaning and form at the same time in
meaningful communication (the one TBLT aims at promoting). The result is that form will only
be attended to if there are spare attentional resources to deal with it, or if something happens
to direct attention to form (VANPATTEN, 1990, in SKEHAN, 1998). Skehan’s idea, then, is to
manipulate learners’ attention when designing a task (or a cycle of tasks). For him, “the
challenge is to channel attentional resources so that there is balanced concern for
communication on the one hand, and form at a general level on the other hand, so that neither
dominates at the expense of the other” (SKEHAN, 1998, p.126). With that, he proposes that L2
instruction revolve around cycles of tasks, which would comprise one (or more) pre-task(s), the
task itself (a while-task), and one (or more) post-task(s).
The purpose for pre-task activities would be to introduce new language, to enhance the
possibilities that restructuring will occur, to mobilize and recycle language previously learned,
to ease the cognitive processing load of the main task, and to push learners to interpret tasks in
more demanding ways (i.e., to get them to experiment with new forms of language). Some
possibilities pointed out by Skehan (1996) are: teaching, consciousness raising activities, and
planning. More explicitly, Ellis (2009) says the following activities might be good pre-task
options: supporting learners when performing a task similar to the main task, providing a
model9 of how the task might be performed by learners, activating learners’ content schemata
and providing background information through brainstorming, and predicting (pre-teaching)
some of the vocabulary the main task will require, among other possibilities.
Skehan (1996) proposes that it is also possible to influence the amount of attention
available for the learner (to focus on form) by manipulating the task in the during-task phase. In
According to information-processing theories, humans’ attention is limited and, therefore, they need to focus
attention selectively (MCLAUGHLIN, 1987).
9
Richard and Schmidt (2010) define a model as “something which is used as a standard or goal for the learner” (p.
370). We see this as an essential component of language learning, but as rather different from restricting language
structures that can be used by learners to perform a task.
8
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
480
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
relation to that, there are a number of choices that can be made in order to influence the
attentional availability of resources. The author gives as examples: time pressure (the more
pressure, the less time for attention to form), modality (spoken tasks will allow less time for online planning and attention to form), support (if visual support is given, as in a here-and-now
task, more resources will be left for the learner to attend to form), control (learners can control,
or not, how the task is done), and stakes (though some learners might be naturally predisposed
to avoid errors, it is the role of the teacher to induce learners to focus on form by linking task
completion to wider pedagogic goals).
It is also possible to change the focus of attention (from meaning to form and vice-versa)
in a more extended procedure (e.g., in a task-based course). Skehan (1998) briefly reviews two
similar proposals, Willis’ (1996) and Samuda et al.’s (1996), which tackle this issue. Both have a
concern with focus on form, but since the instruction will take place for some time, there is no
need to focus on form too explicitly at any moment (form is more (+) or less (-) focused on at
different stages of the task). As a result, focus on form permeates the whole task structure, but
meaning-based communication never has to be abandoned.
Finally, Skehan (1998) establishes two general objectives for post-task activities: altering
the attentional balance, and reflection and consolidation. Since during-task intervention to
make focus on form salient is not possible without interfering with the task objective, which is
to focus on meaning, it is possible to inform learners, prior to task completion, that there is a
post-task to come. The knowledge of a post-task might lead learners to devote a little more
attention to form during task completion if they think this will help their subsequent
performance. The effects of such intervention would possibly yield more accurate language
since learners would refrain from attempting to use more complex language and focus on using
what they are already familiar with.
Another possibility would be requiring that learners themselves (or others) analyze their
performance in a given task. The main aim of reflection and consolidation would be to
encourage learners to restructure, to use their performance in the task as input for “noticing
the gap” (SWAIN, 1998, in SKEHAN, 1998), and thus develop language to deal with such lack of
linguistic ability. It is expected that such activities will make form-meaning relationships and
pattern identification more likely to be integrated in the developing L2 system (SKEHAN, 1998).
Nevertheless, though TBLT seems attractive – focus on meaning plus focus on form –
and, according to Nunan (2004), almost a new orthodoxy, conceiving a task-cycle is complex and
requires theoretical knowledge. So, how much ‘training’ would be necessary for the average L2
teacher to be able to design a task or a cycle of tasks? With this in mind, we set out to conduct
this investigation being guided by the following research question: How do teachers incorporate
the main tenets of TBLT when creating a cycle of tasks?
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
481
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
In the following section, we provide information about the participants, the teaching
contexts (both the student-teacher workshop and the Portuguese as a Host Language course),
and the guidelines provided to the student-teachers for task design.
Contexts of Investigation and task design and selection
The task cycle to be analyzed here was designed as part of the program of a workshop
promoted by the Núcleo de Pesquisa e Ensino de Português – Língua Estrangeira (NUPLE). This
group was created in 1999 and has been coordinating PL2 teaching and research-related
activities at UFSC since then (SILVEIRA; XHAFAJ, 2017). One of its missions is to promote
activities (e.g., elective courses, mini-courses, workshops) to help in the education of teachers
of Portuguese as an L2. In the first semester of 2017, NUPLE researchers decided to offer a
workshop that would focus on the main tenets of TBLT and how this framework could be used
to design tasks to teach Portuguese to speakers of other languages.
The TBLT workshop took place in two three-hour meetings and required that attendees
dedicate at least four hours outside the classroom to finalize the designing of a task cycle. The
workshop was taught by three faculty members of the Department of Foreign Languages and
Literature who are affiliated to NUPLE (the two authors and a TBLT expert). Furthermore, three
guest speakers (2 undergraduate and 1 graduate student) with experience in teaching
Portuguese in the courses coordinated by NUPLE and elsewhere were invited to give an
informal talk about the challenges of teaching their native language, the role of grammar when
teaching Portuguese as a second language, as well as to demonstrate tasks designed to be used
with pre-intermediate or intermediate learners of Portuguese as a second language.
The workshop program included a lecture on the principles of TBLT, reports on the
peculiarities of teaching Portuguese to speakers of other languages, guidelines for the designing
of teaching materials, and hands-on practice with the designing of a task to teach Portuguese to
specific audiences: regular exchange students in the language courses offered by NUPLE or
immigrants attending outreach language courses. The lectures were delivered on the first
meeting, and at the end of this session, the student-teachers were organized in groups and
started outlining a task cycle for a specific group of learners they had in mind. The studentteachers were encouraged to produce a first draft of their task cycle before coming back for the
second meeting. In the second meeting, the groups brought their drafts and additional
materials and information to conclude the designing of the task cycle. The instructors talked to
each group to give them feedback on their task cycle. At the end of the second meeting, each
group presented their task cycle and received feedback from other student-teachers and the
instructors.
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
482
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
Sixteen people, undergraduate and graduate students, attended the two workshop
sessions in which the main objective was to design task-based materials for the teaching of
Portuguese as a second language. From this pool of participants, eleven gathered in four groups
and designed tasks, presented them to the whole group, received individualized feedback on
their tasks and had an opportunity to work on a second version of their tasks.
All groups were given two weeks to prepare a complete version of their task cycles, using
a lesson plan framework provided by the instructors which contained the following sections:
target audience, topic, objectives, content, methodology, resources and materials, procedures,
evaluation, references, appendices. The student-teachers handed in the lesson plan with the
task cycles and received written feedback from two instructors, and were given a chance to
prepare a second version of the lesson plans.
From the four lesson plans, we chose one for analysis and implementation. This task was
produced by three graduate students, two enrolled in Letras programs and one enrolled in the
Anthropology program. They were all interested in the teaching of Portuguese as a second
language and had some experience working in the field of language teaching and/or the
teaching of Portuguese to speakers of other languages. These participants, henceforth referred
to as student-teachers, reported that their teaching experience was highly influenced by the
Communicative Approach to Language Teaching and that they would like to learn about how
the Task-Based Approach could be used to teach Portuguese to speakers of other languages.
We adapted the selected task for use with a group of immigrants enrolled in the course
of Portuguese as a host language, open to immigrants residing in Florianópolis and nearby cities.
The course is part of the PLAM project (Português como Língua de Acolhimento), an extension
program which is also coordinated by NUPLE researchers. This course is free of charge and is
taught by a group of volunteer teachers. The three-hour classes take place on Saturday
mornings, for four months (50-hours total). The target audience consists of immigrants, mostly
refugees and political asylum seekers. The task cycle to be analyzed here was considered
appropriate for the pre-intermediate group, which consisted of seven learners, five Haitians and
two Russians. The learners attending the course in 2017, when this study took place, were
adults in their 20s-40s, three females and four males and had been attending the PLAM classes
for two semesters.
It is worth mentioning that class attendance is very irregular in the PLAM courses, which
poses a challenge to the teachers. Due to the high drop-out rates (immigrants move around
very often seeking for job opportunities) and the constant arrival of new immigrants in the city,
the pedagogical team plans modular classes based on functions/themes, and does not assume
the same students will be following the course regularly.
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
483
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
The PLAM pre-intermediate group was taught by a 25-year-old Brazilian teacher, an
undergraduate student from the English Letras Program at Universidade Federal de Santa
Catarina (UFSC), with experience in the teaching of English and in the teaching of Portuguese to
speakers of other languages. The teacher was assisted by two volunteer teachers (a graduate
and an undergraduate student) who were in the classroom to help the students to complete
their learning activities, and to gain experience with the teaching or PL2.
Designing and adapting the task cycle
In this section, we will first report on the challenges faced by the student-teachers when
designing the task cycle. Next, we will describe the selected task cycle, and explain how the task
was adapted for use with the target audience of pre-intermediate learners. Finally, we will
briefly discuss how the task cycle was implemented in the PLAM class.
As the student-teachers started outlining their task cycle, we immediately noticed some
trends in how they conceived their lesson plan. One fact that stood out was how the planning of
the more experienced teachers was strongly influenced by the Communicative Approach to
language teaching. Their lessons always started with the presentation of the topic and/or
vocabulary. A few groups, though, had difficulty in tracing clear objectives to their lesson,
showing a tendency to prepare a lesson with strong focus on grammar and/or vocabulary
presentation. All groups were trying to use the labels pre-task, task, post-task persistently, thus
showing how they were trying to incorporate the TBLT tenets in their lesson planning. They had
difficulties in labeling each of the phases, which was expected (ELLIS, 2009). Furthermore, we
noticed that all groups found it hard to think of the outcome of their lesson as a point of
departure for their planning, as there was a clear tendency to think of linguistic outcomes (a
composition, a role-play, a scripted dialog) instead of a real-world use for the language being
learned.
As explained before, one task cycle designed by a group of student-teachers and deemed
relevant for the pre-intermediate class of the PLAM project was chosen to be implemented
after further adaptation by the researchers, in order to make the task cycle suit the target
audience needs and to better reflect the TBLT principles.
The topic for the selected task cycle is the use of public transportation in Florianópolis
city. The whole lesson revolves around providing information about how to use public
transportation and helping learners with language components that could be used in this reallife situation. The group structured the lesson around a pre-task and three tasks (the last three
were labeled Activity 1, 2, and 3 in the original lesson plan). The pre-task consists of questions
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
484
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
to introduce the topic and to help elicit and introduce relevant vocabulary. Task 1 elicits
information about how the students make use of public transportation and is intended to
expand relevant vocabulary. Task 2 provides an opportunity to present and elicit questions
related to the use of public transportation and asks learners to use these questions to create a
written dialog that depicts a situation in which someone is asking for information about public
transportation. The learners are expected to read aloud their dialog, and their written
production will be later evaluated by the teacher. Finally, Task 3 (the main task) asks learners to
produce another written text, and this time the genre is a WhatsApp message giving directions
to a person who is arriving in the city and needs to use public transportation to go to a specific
place. Here, visual support, in the form of maps and bus itineraries, is used to help learners
create the text. The outcome of this task, the WhatsApp message, will be read aloud and later
evaluated by the teacher.
As we can see, the original lesson plan is highly influenced by the tenets of the
Communicative Approach to Language Teaching, with an activity to elicit learners’ previous
knowledge and introduce the topic, followed by presentation of vocabulary and structures, and
by moments of more and less controlled practice based on role-play and simulation activities.
The idea of task cycles is present, but the connection between the activities is not very strong.
They all address the same topic, but the student-teachers seem to struggle with the notion of
outcome, which is essential for TBLT. If the outcome of this lesson is to give written directions to
use public transportation, why do learners need to practice the use of questions to ask for
directions as they did in Activity 2? Why do they need to write a dialog using these questions?
Having these concerns in mind, we decided to adapt the lesson plan in order to make it more
aligned with the idea of task cycles and to make it more adequate to be used with a particular
group of learners we knew well: the pre-intermediate learners of the PLAM project.
The adapted version of the lesson plan still kept the central goal of helping learners to
understand the public transportation system in the city they were residing and to provide and
understand directions about the use of public transportation. The idea was to adapt the lesson
plan in a way it would become more aligned with TBLT principles and to add a few teacher
resources that were missing from the original lesson plan (city maps and bus timetables). Chart
1 below summarizes the main changes made to the original lesson plan.
Chart 1 - Comparing the original lesson plan and the adapted version
Original Lesson Plan
Adapted Lesson Plan
Pre-Task: questions to elicit information about
transportation system
Pre-Task 1: The original idea was kept, but some
questions were rephrased.
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
485
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
Activity 1: eliciting/introducing key vocabulary (T/Ss)
Pre-Task 2: Students worked in pairs to classify some
words under major categories written on the board
and added other words they found relevant.
Activity 2: eliciting/introducing key questions to ask
about transportation. Students use questions to write
a dialog and act it out. Dialogs are collected for
correction.
Task 1: Pair-work: Explain to each other how to get
to their home using public transportation or by
walking.
Activity 3: writing a WhatsApp message to a visitor
giving instructions about how to use public
transportation from the bus terminal downtown to
the learner’s home.
Task 2: The first-draft of the lesson plan proposed an
email as the text genre to be produced. We
suggested the genre WhatsApp message would be
more appropriate for the learners of PLAM project.
Wrapping up: students read texts aloud and teacher
collects them for correction. Further information
about transportation.
Post-Task: Reading aloud10 was accompanied by
questions for students to compare itineraries.
As Chart 1 shows, the warm-up activity was kept, with a slight adaptation that involved
rephrasing the questions to elicit previous knowledge and introduce the topic. Chart 2 compares
the sets of questions, showing that, in the adapted task, we tried to narrow down the focus of
the questions, so that from the very beginning learners would discuss the transportation system
in Florianópolis and to elicit information about what they already knew about giving and
understanding directions related to transportation. We also included specific information about
the task outcome (question f), so that learners would know from the start what they should
accomplish towards the end of the lesson.
Chart 2 - Adaptions to the pre-task
Original task
Adapted task
1. Quais os principais meios de transporte aqui em
Florianópolis? E no país de cada um/a de vocês?
a) Como vocês vieram pra aula?
2. Vocês vieram de ônibus para a aula de hoje?
b) Vocês usam o sistema de ônibus de Florianópolis
com frequência?
3. Outros meios de transportes? Listar
vocabulário.
c)Vocês acham fácil
Florianópolis? Por quê?
4. Qual ônibus pegaram? (anote o nome ou
número das linhas citadas na lousa)
[Pode continuar fazendo outras perguntas, com
base nas respostas dos alunos, mas não estender a
conversa por mais de 10 min.]
usar
os
ônibus
de
10
The reason we opted to ask them to read aloud their messages rather than sending them to classmates so that
they could read in their phones was the fact that not all our students have access to the internet on their phones
while in class.
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
486
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
5. Quanto custou a passagem?
d) Você sabe explicar como usar os ônibus de
Florianópolis?
Perguntar aos alunos: Onde você pegou o ônibus?
Mostre a variação: pegar, tomar (outras variantes
regionais possíveis). Revise os advérbios de lugar,
se necessário for. Marcar no mapa com os alunos
o lugar de partida e verificar o tempo estimado.
1. Onde você pegou/tomou o ônibus?
2. Quanto tempo você levou de lá até aqui?
3. Quanto tempo você esperou no ponto?
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
[dependendo das respostas dos alunos, fazer mais
perguntas para explicitar o objetivo da aula –
tarefa escrita explicando como usar os ônibus de
Florianópolis]
Perguntas adicionais:
e) Sabe explicar, por exemplo, como chegar até o
aeroporto, ou à rodoviária?
f) Você sabe explicar como usar o ônibus para uma
pessoa escrevendo uma mensagem no Whatsapp?
In the original lesson plan, Activity 1 was a teacher-centered activity making use of
questions to elicit and present vocabulary, especially frequency adverbs. As Chart 3 shows, we
altered this activity by designing a vocabulary activity (Pre-task 2) that first had students work in
pairs to classify a few words under major vocabulary categories in the field of public
transportation in the city the learners were residing (people, actions, bus types, bus objects and
parts). The teacher should write these categories on the board, give some of the words to each
pair, and guide the learners to classify the words they already knew. The elicitation of
vocabulary should be done first in pairs, then by discussing all the vocabulary items with the
whole class. Finally, learners should be asked to add other words they knew or would like to
know to each category.
Chart 3 - Pre-Task 2 – adaptation of Activity 1
Pessoas
Coisas que você faz
Tipo de ônibus
Objetos e partes do ônibus
Motorista
Passageiro
Cobrador
Outros?
Pegar o ônibus
Subir
Descer
Perder
Pagar
Sentar
Passar na catraca
Ficar em pé
Parar
Outros?
Direto
Expresso
Semi-direto
Executivo (amarelinho)
Intermunicipais
Outros?
Porta
Catraca
Assento
Passagem
Corrimão
Campainha/cordinha
Degrau
Cartão passe rápido
Outros?
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
487
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
We also made changes to Activity 2, which originally elicited vocabulary and presented
question forms to ask information about transportations. The questions were intended to be
used by the learners to write a dialog simulating a situation in which they would need to ask
information about transportation, which would later be acted out and evaluated by the teacher.
We considered that this role-play activity was not in tune with the outcome that was expected
for the lesson, that is, producing written instructions about how to use public transportation to
arrive at a specific place. Thus, we changed the role-play activity into a pair-work activity (Task
1), which required learners to work in pairs and explain to each other how to go to their home
using public transportation or by walking, having as a point of departure the place where they
were at that moment. Our reasoning was that this simple exchange of information would
provide learners with an opportunity to display knowledge they already possessed about giving
directions and the use of public transportation, as well as give them a chance to ask for help if
they lacked grammar and vocabulary to explain directions and to talk about the bus system in
Florianópolis.
Activity 3, in the original lesson plan, was the main outcome for the task cycle and
consisted of having learners provide written instructions to a city visitor about how to use the
bus system to commute from the central bus station to their home address. In what we call Task
2, we kept the original task proposed by the student-teachers, as we had already given them
some relevant suggestions about how to make the task more adequate for the learners
attending the PLAM courses. For example, during class presentation, we explained to the group
of student-teachers that the original text genre they proposed in the first draft of the lesson
plan (e-mail message) was hardly used by the learners, who reported often using WhatsApp or
Facebook messages to communicate. Furthermore, in the first draft, the student-teachers
proposed that the directions should explain how to commute from the airport to the learners’
home. Instead, we suggested that the point of departure for the visitor should be the central
bus station, as this route would be easier for learners to explain. In the adapted version of the
task, however, we felt the need to provide additional scaffolding to help learners write the
WhatsApp message. As can be seen in Chart 4, we provided them with written instructions on
what should be written, including specific information about the content the message should
include: bus fare, bus schedule(s), bus stops relevant for the trip, approximate travel time.
Chart 4 - Tasks 1 and 2 – adaptation of Activity 2 and 3
Etapa 3: Dando instruções de como chegar à sua casa de ônibus (15-20m)
Organizar alunos em duplas ou trios. Escolher a casa de um dos alunos do grupo para explicar como
chegar da UFSC até a casa desse aluno de ônibus. Grupo anota as instruções e um representante vai na
frente da sala e utiliza o mapa da Grande Florianópolis e/ou dos transportes para explicar o caminho para
a casa do aluno X, de ônibus.
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
488
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
Professor e demais alunos reagem e comentam se as instruções ficaram claras ou se podem ficar melhor.
[Professores assistentes auxiliam os grupos na preparação do itinerário]
Etapa 4: Criar itinerário (aprox. 20 min)
• Mantenha a projeção do mapa. Explique a tarefa projetando as instruções no Power Point e entregando
uma cópia das instruções para os alunos:
Instruções:
- Uma pessoa que você conhece está chegando em Florianópolis e você precisa explicar no WhatsApp
para que a pessoa consiga ir de ônibus da rodoviária até a sua casa. Essa pessoa fala apenas português.
- Sua mensagem deve conter:
(a) o preço das passagens;
(b) os horários;
(c) os pontos de ônibus onde a pessoa deve subir e descer do ônibus;
(d) tempo aproximado da viagem.
Professor entrega informação sobre itinerário centro-casa dos alunos (alunos vão
trabalhar em pares e utilizar endereço do aluno para o qual tivermos mapa). Circule pela
sala de aula e auxilie os estudantes com suas dúvidas.
[professores assistentes auxiliam com a linguagem]
To close the task cycle, the student-teachers proposed that learners should read their
messages aloud and hand in the written texts for teacher’s evaluation, and that learners would
receive further information (e.g., bus schedule, maps) to use the public transportation in the
city of residence. We expanded the reading-aloud activity (Post-task) by proposing a set of
questions for learners to answer while listening to their classmates’ reading, as we thought this
was a good opportunity to ask learners to focus on specific information provided by their
classmates, thus increasing the chances for them to learn from each other by observing the
different linguistic resources they used to explain the itineraries. This follow-up activity was also
a way of promoting peer-feedback, as it gave learners an opportunity to tell each other whether
the instructions were clear and complete. As can be seen in Chart 4, learners had to fill out a
chart with the essential information that should be provided in the message (e.g., price,
schedule, trip duration, bus information) and then compare the different itineraries to answer
four questions that involved saying which learner (a) lives further from the bus terminal,
(b)spends more money with the bus fare, or (c) uses more buses to commute. The last
question was more subjective, as it asked which learner’s house they would like to visit and
why.
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
489
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
Chart 5 - The outcome Activity added to the cycle
Etapa 5: Comparar itinerários (aprox. 10-15 min)
● Passado o tempo da atividade, peça que cada grupo leia sua mensagem de Whatsapp.
● Enquanto os pares leem suas instruções, demais alunos fazem uma atividade de
compreensão e comparação dos itinerários, anotando os seguintes itens (tabela entregue pelo
professor). Professor lê as informações abaixo e certifica-se de que os alunos entenderam o que
devem fazer.
Comparando os itinerários
Assista à apresentação de seus colegas e anote informações importantes para responder
as perguntas abaixo:
Autor
da
Mensagem
Valor
passagem
da
Tempo
viagem
de
Número de ônibus que precisa
pegar
Compare suas anotações e responda:
a) Quem mora mais longe?
b) Quem gasta mais para ir da rodoviária até a sua casa?
c) Quem precisa trocar mais de ônibus
d) Quem você gostaria de visitar? Por quê?
• Professor coleta os textos preparados para comunicação via WhatsApp, para correção.
• Professor informa sites e locais para mais informações sobre o transporte público (handout –
fazer).
Informe ao grupo que é possível pedir horários impressos de qualquer ônibus na Secretaria de
Transportes no Terminal do Centro, acessando os sites das empresas de ônibus ou utilizando
aplicativos como o BusMaps Floripa e o App Fênix.
We believe the adapted Lesson Plan is aligned with the TBLT approach because it
incorporates essential features, namely:
a) It has a primary focus on meaning and it is expected to engage learners because it
addresses a topic that is relevant in the real world;
b) It is designed to elicit information learners already possess and requires their active
participation in the activities to reach an outcome;
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
490
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
c) It brings moments of focus on form to help learners boost their vocabulary knowledge
about public transportation and how to give directions;
d) It focuses on meaning and it integrates skills, mainly speaking and writing;
e) It allows evaluating the students’ performance by verifying whether they succeeded in
completing the two tasks that required explaining how to use public transportation.
To conclude this discussion, we would like to say a few words about the implementation
of the adapted lesson plan in the class of pre-intermediate learners of the PLAM course. We
gathered with the teacher in charge of working the class and explained the lesson plan to him.
He made a few suggestions about the procedures for classroom implementation and we
provided him with all the resources needed to implement the lesson (e.g., bus itineraries, maps,
copies of specific activities). On the day of the class, we read and explained the consent form to
the learners and explained to them why we were there. We sat in the back of the classroom,
together with one teacher assistant who was present, so we could observe the class and take
notes. Upon request, we joined the teachers and helped a few learners with the planning and
writing of the WhatsApp message.
What we could observe was that the lesson plan was adequate and relevant for that
group of learners. The teacher seemed to feel very comfortable while teaching the lesson and
managed to get the learners intensely involved with all activities. We noticed that the learners
particularly enjoyed the vocabulary building steps and the exchange of information about how
to commute to their homes. However, we also observed that the outcome for Task 2, that is,
the written task, posed a major challenge to a few learners. This was the only moment in class
when the help of teacher assistants was required, as a few students struggled to write in
Portuguese. The implementation of the lesson plan occurred on a rainy day and the class
started with some delay. Due to this problem, there was no time for wrapping up the lesson by
using the follow-up activity as we had planned. Thus, the teacher asked the learners to read
aloud their messages and elicited impressions and/or questions from the students in a brief
manner, which partially fulfilled our goal of providing a moment for peer-feedback about task
completion.
Final remarks
The present text was written to demonstrate how principles of the Task-Based Approach
can contribute to the teaching of Portuguese as an additional language. We began the text by
highlighting central ideas, frameworks, and definitions presented by important researchers in
the field. Then, we reported on a pedagogical experience with a group of student-teachers
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
491
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
attending a workshop designed to introduce the Task-Based Approach to the teaching of
Portuguese to speakers of other languages. In the data analysis section, we discussed a cycle of
tasks designed by a group of student-teachers during the workshop and pointed out the extent
to which this cycle incorporated the notions of the Task-Based Approach. Finally, we proposed
adaptations to the original task cycle in order to make it more aligned with the principles of the
Task-Based Approach, having in mind a specific group of learners, briefly mentioning how the
task cycle actually worked when it was implemented with a group of pre-intermediate learners
of Portuguese.
We hope this text has demonstrated that the Task-Based Approach has potential in
teacher education, and is a means to promote collaborative work in the language classroom. It
is our understanding that by designing task cycles, language teachers will take on an active role
in choosing the materials to be used in class, as well as better understand the need for planning,
reflecting, and adapting their lessons and course materials. The use of task cycles is also
expected to motivate learners, thanks to their focus on meaning and on real-world situations,
which are brought to the classroom, with the necessary adaptations.
References
BYGATE, M.; SKEHAN, P.; SWAIN, M. Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning,
teaching, and testing. London: Longman, 2001.
ELLIS, R. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
ELLIS, R. The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and
accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, v. 30, n. 4, p. 474-509, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp042
FOSTER, P.; SKEHAN, P. The influence of planning and task type on second language
performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, v. 18, n. 3, p. 299-323, 1996.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047
LONG, M. Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In: BOT, K. de;
GINSBERG, R.; KRAMSCH, C. (Eds.). Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1991. p. 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
MCLAUGHLIN, B. Theories of second language learning. London: Edward Arnold, 1987.
NUNAN, D. Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667336
OLIVEIRA, L. M. Métodos de ensino de inglês: teoria, práticas, ideologias. São Paulo: Parábola
Editorial, 2014.
RICHARDS, J. C.; SCHMIDT, R. Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied
linguistics (4th ed.). London: Longman (Pearson Education), 2010.
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
492
The use of tasks in the teaching of Portuguese as a Second Language
Rosane Silveira
Donesca C. Puntel Xhafaj
ROBINSON, P. Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: a triadic framework for
examining task influences on SLA. In: ROBINSON, P. (Ed.). Cognition and second language
instruction.
Cambridge:
Cambridge
University
Press,
2001.
p.
287-318.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.012
SAMUDA, V.; GASS, S.; ROUNDS, P. Two types of task in communicative language teaching. In:
TESOL CONVENTION. Chicago: TESOL, mar. 1996. Paper presentation.
SILVEIRA, R.; XHAFAJ, D. C. P. Português para falantes de outras línguas: a atuação do Núcleo de
Pesquisa e Ensino de Português - Língua Estrangeira. In: TOMITCH, L. M.; HEBERLE, V. M. (Orgs.).
Perspectivas atuais de aprendizagem e ensino de línguas. Florianópolis: LLE/CCE/UFSC, 2017. p.
237-283.
SKEHAN, P. A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics,
Oxford, v. 17, p. 38-62, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.38
SKEHAN, P. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900209
SKEHAN, P.; FOSTER, P. The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative
retellings. Language Learning, Ann Arbor, v. 49, p. 93-120, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/14679922.00071
SKEHAN, P. Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, Cambridge, v. 36, p. 1-14, 2003.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200188X
WILLIS,
J.
Criteria
for
identifying tasks
for
TBL.
[20--].
Available
in:
th
https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/criteria-identifying-tasks-tbl Access: Jul. 15 , 2019.
WILLIS, D.; WILLIS, J. Task-based language learning. In: CARTER, R.; NUNAN, D. (Eds.). Teaching
English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. p. 173179. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.026
WILLIS, D.; WILLIS, J. Doing task-based teaching: Oxford handbooks for language teachers.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Recebido em: 30/09/2019.
Aceito em: 30/12/2019.
Linguagem & Ensino, Pelotas, v. 23, n. 2, p. 473-493, abr.-jun. 2020
493