Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916 Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.17/March-2024/1.pdf RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Spatial and temporal distribution of foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in Algeria from 2014 to 2022 Meryem Guessoum1 , Mounir Adnane2 , Ratiba Baazizi3 , and Madina-Saliha Derguini4 1.Local Animal Resources Management Laboratory, National Veterinary School, BP161 El-Harrach, Algiers, Algeria; 2.Department of Biomedicine, Institute of Veterinary Sciences, University Ibn Khaldoun of Tiaret, Tiaret 14000, Algeria; 3.Department of Clinic, National Veterinary High School, ENSV, Algiers, Algeria; 4. Veterinary Inspection of Algiers, Department of Agricultural Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Algeria. Corresponding author: Meryem Guessoum, e-mail: m.guessoum@ensv.dz Co-authors: MA: mounir.adnane@univ-tiaret, RB: r.baazizi@ensv.dz, MD: derguini.m.ms@gmail.com Received: 28-11-2023, Accepted: 06-02-2024, Published online: 05-03-2024 doi: www.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2024.509-517 How to cite this article: Guessoum M, Adnane M, Baazizi R, and Derguini M (2024) Spatial and temporal distribution of foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in Algeria from 2014 to 2022, Veterinary World, 17(3): 509–517. Abstract Background and Aim: Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), a major transboundary animal ailment in Algeria, is a serious economic burden on the livestock sector. This study aimed to investigate the spatiotemporal distribution of FMD in Algeria and identifies the factors contributing to this phenomenon. Materials and Methods: Data on FMD cases occurring in Algeria from 2014 to 2022 were collected from various sources, including archives at the Ministry of Agriculture, peer-reviewed journal articles, conference proceedings, reference laboratory reports, and unpublished scientific reports. The data were compiled and analyzed using MS Office Excel® and SPSS® software. Results: A total of 22,690 FMD cases and 1,141 outbreaks were reported in Algeria between 2014 and 2022. The apex of infections occurred in 2014 (34.5%), followed by an increase in the number of infections in 2019 and 2017. The prevalence of FMD extended to 91.6% of the districts of the country, particularly in the north (center) and eastern regions. Cows were the most affected, with 654 outbreaks and more than 3,665 cases. Although FMD affected all four regions, there was a statistically significant long-term decline in the incidence. Conclusion: These spatial and temporal trends underscore the robust disease control methodologies implemented by the Algerian government, such as the strategic immunization of livestock to fortify their viral resistance, stringent constraints on animal mobility, and enlightenment of farmers regarding the hazards associated with unrestricted livestock movement to effectively curb FMD dissemination. Keywords: control measures, distribution, foot-and-mouth disease, livestock, outbreaks. Introduction Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious viral infection that inflicts severe economic losses on susceptible cloven-hoofed animals, including cattle, sheep, goats, swine, and various wildlife species [1–3]. The causative agent of FMD is the Aphthovirus genus belonging to the Picornaviridae family [4]. This virus induces the formation of vesicular lesions on the feet, oral mucosa, and mammary glands, which cannot be clinically distinguished from other vesicular diseases such as vesicular stomatitis, swine vesicular disease, and vesicular exanthema of swine, all of which can exhibit comparable clinical indications [5]. The FMD virus (FMDV) exhibits antigenic diversity and includes seven recognized distinct serotypes: A, O, C, Asia-1, and South African Copyright: Guessoum, et al. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http:// creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916 Territories 1–3, each containing multiple subtypes and strains [6]. Although there is no cross-protection among the serotypes, there are notable serological cross-reactions [3, 7, 8]. Affected animals usually show symptoms such as fever, lameness, and vesicular lesions on the tongue, snout, feet, and teats. In severe cases, the epithelium may slough off, leading to rupture of vesicles and significant release of viral load [9]. The clinical manifestations of FMD may vary according to species, particularly in sheep, where it is particularly difficult to detect because of the lack of obvious symptoms. Unrecognized FMD infections in sheep can rapidly propagate outbreaks [10]. In most adult animals, FMD is generally not considered a fatal disease. Although it may lead to significant economic losses because of reduced productivity and trade restrictions, it does not usually lead to death in adult animals. However, FMD may be more severe in young animals, particularly in very young calves and lambs [11]. Young animals are particularly vulnerable to FMD, and the current trend in animal breeding, which focuses on efficient and disease-sensitive animals, continues to jeopardize agricultural growth in many African countries. 509 Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.17/March-2024/1.pdf In addition, FMD outbreaks have resulted in significant restrictions on the export of animals and animal products from affected countries [12]. The main consequences are reduced productivity, limited entry into the market, widespread culling of animal populations, adverse effects on biodiversity, and irreplaceable loss of genetic resources. The World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) has formalized an official registry of disease-free countries and regions, underlining its profound global importance [13]. FMD is not considered as a major zoonosis, however, in very rare cases, people may be infected with FMDV, usually through direct contact with infected animals or tissues. The resulting disease in humans is generally mild and self-limiting, consisting of fever and blisters on the hands and feet. FMD is considered an endemic disease in specific regions worldwide, affecting extensive areas of Africa, Asia, and South America. The geographical distribution of each FMD serotype varies, with serotype O having the widest spread [14, 15]. Direct losses caused by FMD, such as reduced milk and meat production, and indirect losses significantly impact the food security and livelihoods of communities in low-income areas where FMD is prevalent [3, 13, 16, 17]. After the recurrence of FMD in Algeria in 2014, FMD continued to be a persistent problem, and Algeria has been designated as an FMD-afflicted region. Health authorities work diligently to eradicate the disease, and breeders, veterinarians, and other experts serve as the first line of defense in the detection chain. To mitigate the risk of the introduction and spread of FMD, veterinary services have implemented vaccination of cattle. Prophylactic measures included the control of animal movements, vaccination in farms and livestock markets, and strict control in slaughterhouses. These efforts have significantly reduced the incidence of FMD in Algeria. The national control plan recommended by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OIE) serves as a strategy for FMD management in Algeria. This approach requires a comprehensive understanding of the spatiotemporal distribution of FMD, which involves analyzing the monthly, yearly, and geographical clusters of FMD outbreaks. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of FMD in Algeria from 2014 to 2022, with a particular focus on evaluating the effectiveness of the control measures implemented. Materials and Methods Ethics approval Ethics approval was not applicable to this study. Study period and location The data were collected for FMD outbreaks in Algeria from 2014 to 2022. Algeria, located in North Africa, is the largest country on the African continent and the tenth largest in the world. The border connects Tunisia to the northeast, Libya to the Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916 east, Niger to the southeast, Mali to the southwest, Mauritania and Western Sahara to the west, and Morocco to the northwest. To the north, Algeria has a coastline along the Mediterranean Sea. With an area of 2.3 million km2, Algeria is characterized by a diverse geographical landscape, ranging from coastal areas along the Mediterranean coast to vast desert areas in the south. The distribution of livestock production systems in Algeria varies significantly due to the country’s large geographical area, resulting in different weather patterns in different regions, where small ruminants are predominantly concentrated in the steppes and dairy farms are more prevalent in coastal regions [18, 19]. The livestock sector contributes approximately 5%–10% of the total income of farmers, predominantly smallholders who represent 70% of the livestock production in Algeria [20]. These small farms in Algeria usually lack awareness about biosecurity measures, leading to unrestricted movement of animals. In addition, limited access to information on livestock management and veterinary services is considered a significant constraint for livestock production activities. National FMD surveillance data from 2014 to 2022 were obtained from the Department of Animal Health (DAH) in the Algerian Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MADR). These national data contain information on the number of cases, animal species (cattle, goats, and sheep), identified serotypes, and estimated outbreak dates and locations in communes, districts, and municipalities. The data were collected by the local sub-DAH through passive surveillance on a daily/weekly basis. Most reported cases were diagnosed on the basis of clinical observations by local animal health professionals, whereas some cases were confirmed through laboratory tests performed at the national level. Data collection Algeria is geographically divided into 48 wilayas, which are equivalent to administrative provinces or territorial communities. The country is divided into four main administrative regions: central, western, eastern, and northern. These regions are further divided into 160 sub-prefectures and 1540 communes. Note that Algeria underwent a reorganization in 2021, which resulted in the establishment of 58 departments. However, it should be noted that this new distribution in statistical services is yet to be fully implemented. This study used a retrospective case series approach to examine FMD. The data for this study were collected from MADR and the Algerian Ministry of Public Health (MPH). FMD was defined based on clinical observation of characteristic lesions and confirmed through laboratory analysis. Data on FMD cases in Algeria between 2014 and 2022 were collected from different sources. These include peer-reviewed journal articles, conference 510 Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.17/March-2024/1.pdf proceedings, reference laboratory reports, unpublished scientific reports, and gray literature. The gray literature encompassed records from authoritative sources such as the National Epidemiology Unit, the Central Veterinary Research Laboratory’s Virology Database, annual reports from the Ministry of Agriculture, and FMD reports from the National Institute of Animal Health. The case data consisted of details such as the date of occurrence, location, number of cases, population at risk (if available), serotype involved, type of vaccination, and type of vaccine used. Subsequently, outbreak information and livestock data were recorded in Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft Office, Washington, USA) and analyzed using STATA version 14 software (StataCorp. TX, USA). Exclusion and inclusion criteria Only FMD outbreaks in cattle, sheep, and goats were identified as inclusion criteria in this study. This information was limited to outbreaks occurred from July 2014 to December 2022. Statistical analysis MS Office Excel® software was used to compile and analyze data on the number of FMD cases and outbreaks. Continuous data are presented as averages, and categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. The SPSS® Statistics Version 20.0 (IBM Corp., NY, USA) enabled the use of a 5% confidence interval and Chi-square test. The difference was significant when the p-value was 5%. Results Case distribution of FMD infections by years From 2014 to 2022, there were 70,750 cases of FMD in all 48 departments of Algeria. The highest infection rate was observed in 2014 (p < 0.05), accounting for 34.5% of cases, followed by 2019 (15.3%), 2017 (13.3%), and 2018 (11.2%). In contrast, 2015 and 2022 exhibited the lowest infection rates of 2.9% and 5.4%, respectively (Figure-1). Of these, 80.1% (56,715 cases), 13.5% (9,592 cases), and 6.3% (459 cases) were reported in sheep, cattle, and goats, respectively (Figure-2). Temporal distributions by years of FMD outbreaks From July 2014 to the end of 2022, 1,141 FMD outbreaks were recorded in Algeria. These outbreaks occurred in 91.6% (44 out of 48) districts of the country (Figure-3). The highest number of outbreaks (p = 0.001) was reported in 2014 (40.9%), followed by 2019 (24.1%). On the other hand, 2015 exhibited the lowest outbreaks at 2.1% and 2022 at 3.5% (Figure-1). Regional distributions and temporal patterns of FMD cases During the study period, the northern (center) region reported the highest number of outbreaks (460 outbreaks; 40.3%), followed by the eastern region (382 outbreaks; 33.4%) (Figure-3). The southern and western regions had the lowest number of outbreaks, with 156 (13.6%) and 143 (12.5%) outbreaks, respectively. Significant regional variations were observed in the number of reported outbreaks within the same year (p = 0.05) (Figure-4). In 2014, 257 cases (55%) occurred in the central region, followed by 183 cases (38.7%) in the eastern region. Similar trends emerged in 2017 and 2018, with the central and eastern regions being the most affected regions. In 2015, the southern region experienced the highest outbreak rate (91.6%). Notably, in 2019 and 2022, the eastern region faced the highest impact, with 82 outbreaks (29.4%) and 21 outbreaks (56.7%), respectively (Figures-4 and 5). In 2014, the highest incidence of infection was observed in cattle, with 2,755 of 7,083 cows showing clinical symptoms in the outbreak regions (Figure-2). A cumulative incidence of 1,009 affected cows was observed in the district of Setif in the northeastern part of the country (Figure-4). Adjacent areas such as TiziOuzou, Bejaia, Mila, and Bouira also reported varying infection rates (Figure-3). Suspected cases of FMD 30000 40% 35% 25000 30% 20000 25% 20% 15000 15% 10000 10% 5000 0 5% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 No. of outbreaks 467 24 0 128 207 278 0 0 37 No. of suspected 8020 5490 0 3167 28353 24211 0 0 1509 No. of affected 2767 159 0 420 3173 3694 0 0 82 Infection rate 35% 3% 0% 13% 11% 15% 0% 0% 5% 0% Figure-1: Annual foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks, suspected cases, and affected cases recorded in Algeria between 2014 and 2022. N°= number. Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916 511 Number of suspected cases Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.17/March-2024/1.pdf In 2022, there were 37 reported FMD outbreaks. Out of 1,509 suspected cases, 82 were confirmed, with 80 cases affecting cattle. Table-1 summarizes FMD outbreaks and cases from 2014 to 2022. 30000 25000 20000 15000 Discussion 10000 This study identifies the temporal and spatial patterns of FMD in Algeria from 2014 to 2022. The disease remained prevalent throughout the study period, with notable peaks in 2014, 2018, and 2019. Algeria is listed as an FMD-endemic country, and the disease continues to pose economic and productivity challenges [21]. During the study period, 1,141 outbreaks were recorded, with an average annual incidence of 138.8 outbreaks. The distribution of outbreaks was extensive, covering almost all regions, with a higher incidence in the central and eastern regions. In 1999, there was a call for increased alertness in all Algerian regions, leading to a comprehensive active monitoring of farms. All veterinary professionals were mobilized and strictly adhered to the biosafety measures. Media channels have been used to raise awareness, emphasizing farmers’ participation in disease prevention and control programs to protect livestock. All cattle affected on the farms were culled, and the owners received appropriate compensation from the local government. In addition, enhanced surveillance activities covered a 10-km radius of the outbreak zone. Extensive vaccination campaigns included 1.4 million cattle and 160,551 boosters every month. In addition, 600,000 sheep and 34,733 goats were vaccinated around the outbreak areas. Since 1999, Algeria has reported no FMD cases [22]. On July 23, 2014, an FMD outbreak was detected in the Setif district, eastern Algeria, near the Tunisian border [23, 24]. The outbreak originated on a cattle farm and was linked to the illegal introduction of animals from Tunisia. Subsequent testing identified the virus as part of the O/MESA/Ind2001d lineage, which is closely related to strains isolated during Tunisia’s 2014 FMD outbreaks [22]. The outbreak spreads rapidly, and cases were documented in many districts. Since late August, more than 350 outbreaks have been officially registered in 33 different districts. Notably, none of the documented cases involved cattle, with no clinical or serological evidence of FMD in small ruminants. To limit the spread of the disease, regional authorities have put in place a national emergency vaccination program targeting cattle. In addition, imports of susceptible animal species from high-risk countries have been temporarily suspended. Rigorous sanitary measures, such as the isolation of infected animals, hygienic slaughter procedures, and thorough disinfection, have been rigorously enforced within households and their surroundings. These comprehensive measures effectively halt the transmission of the disease and prevent the emergence of new cases. In 2015, there was a significant decrease in the number of recorded outbreaks, which could be 5000 0 cow 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 7083 sheep 817 goat 120 46 0 904 0 0 255 5350 0 2063 25821 21624 1116 172 0 0 1040 94 0 200 0 0 214 1416 2415 Figure-2: Annual distribution of foot-and-mouth disease cases reported in Algeria, by species, during 2014–2022. Figure-3: Spatial distribution of foot-and-mouth disease in the districts of Algeria (2014–2022). The map depicts the district-level administration divisions represented by gray lines. The shaded area highlights the cumulative reports of foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in each district from 2014 to 2022, providing an overview of the disease’s distribution across the country over the specified period [Source: The base map was adopted from https://www. pngegg.com/en/png-chhsm, accessed November 5, 2023]. were observed in 200 goats and 1,572 sheep, with the El-Bayadh region reporting the highest infection rate among sheep, affecting 142 animals. In 2017, 128 FMD outbreaks were detected in different regions, with distribution as follows: 35% (45/128) in the central region, 28% (36/128) in the east, 20% (21/128) in the west, and 16% (21/128) in the south. Of the 420 confirmed cases, 59.3% (249 cases) were observed in cattle, whereas 40.7% (171 cases) were identified in small ruminants. In 2018, the majority of FMD outbreaks occurred in the northern regions of the country, with some outbreaks also reported in the western and southeastern regions. Overall, a total of 207 FMD outbreaks affected 580 ruminants. In 2019, 278 FMD outbreaks were reported. The highest number of outbreaks occurred in the eastern region (29.5%), followed closely by the central and western regions. Small ruminants showed the highest susceptibility, with 24,039 clinically diagnosed cases. Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916 512 Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.17/March-2024/1.pdf 140 No. of outbreaks 120 100 80 60 40 20 adrar Chlef Laghouat Oum El Bouaghi Batna Béjaïa Biskra Béchar Blida Bouira Tamanrasset Tébessa Tlemcen Tiaret Tizi Ouzou Alger Djelfa Jijel Sétif Saïda Skikda Sidi Bel Abbès Annaba Guelma Constantine Médéa Mostaganem M'Sila Mascara Ouargla Oran El Bayadh Illizi Bordj Bou Arreridj Boumerdès El Tarf Tindouf Tissemsilt El Oued Khenchela Souk Ahras Tipaza Mila Aïn Defla Naâma Aïn Témouchent Ghardaïa Relizane 0 Districts 2014 2015 2017 2018 2019 2022 Total Figure-4: Spatial distribution of foot-and-mouth disease in Algerian districts during 2014–2022. Number of outbreaks 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 center 257 0 0 45 66 77 0 0 15 East 183 0 0 36 60 82 0 0 21 West 17 2 0 26 24 74 0 0 0 south 10 22 0 21 57 45 0 0 1 Figure-5: Distribution of foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in Algerian regions and per year during 2014–2022. attributed to extensive vaccination campaigns initiated in response to the 2014 outbreaks. Together with the early detection and culling of affected animals, these efforts are likely to have contributed to the decline in reported cases. Notably, a significant number of cases have been reported in western Algeria, coincident with the official outbreak of FMD in Morocco, involving the same serovar (O) [25]. According to the literature, sheep are typically asymptomatic or exhibit mild symptoms of FMD, yet they play a key role in transmitting the virus to more vulnerable ruminants, especially cattle [26]. However, some studies have indicated that sheep can also develop clinical signs of FMD because of the high mutation rate of the virus [27]. The absence of FMD outbreaks reported in Algeria in 2016 suggests the effectiveness of the control measures implemented after the 2014–2015 epidemic. In 2017, Algeria reported a new outbreak of FMD associated with a different strain, specifically serotype A. Four outbreaks associated with FMD serotype A occurred in the northern part of the country [28]. Subsequently, virus samples were forwarded to the OIE reference laboratory in Brescia, Italy (IZSLER), for confirmation and genetic lineage Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916 identification through sequence analysis. Phylogenetic analysis focusing on the VP1 coding gene revealed that FMDV serotype A detected in Algeria belonged to the A/Africa topotype, specifically falling within lineage G-IV. This lineage is endemic to sub-Saharan countries. Genetic analysis revealed that the closest genetic relatives of this Algerian serotype A virus are type A isolates from Nigeria dating back to 2015. The FMD World Reference Laboratory at the Pirbright Institute conducted vaccine-matching tests to identify the most suitable vaccine strain for potential use against a specific identified strain. According to the 2017 Biennial Report submitted by the Algerian authorities, a significant preventive vaccination campaign was conducted between July and December 2017. This large-scale vaccination campaign targeted almost two million cattle and involved the administration of a bivalent vaccine intended to confer immunity against serotypes A and O. However, the report did not specify the effectiveness of this vaccine against the previously identified strain. There is a need for further clarification and research to determine the efficacy of the vaccine against these specific FMD strains. Since July 9, 2018, Algerian veterinary authorities have reported a worrying resurgence of FMD, with nine new outbreaks documented across various regions in the northern part of the country. In response, many strict control measures have been swiftly implemented, including the culling of infected animals, strict restrictions on livestock movement, thorough disinfection of affected farms, and establishment of strict surveillance protocols both within and outside designated containment and protection zones [29]. Serotype O, belonging to the East Africa 3 topotype, was the FMD strain identified in these outbreaks [29]. Notably, FMD exhibited rapid transmission, with 207 FMD outbreaks detected. The Tizi-Ouzou region emerged as the epicenter of this outbreak, which was characterized by an alarmingly elevated infection rate. In this region, cattle species were the most affected by 513 Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.17/March-2024/1.pdf Table-1: Annual outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease, suspected cases, affected cases, animal species and regional occurrence in Algeria (2014–2022). Year Animal species Region Number of outbreaks Number of suspected cases Number of affected animals Infection rate (%) 2014 Cow Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South Center East West South 238 155 15 7 12 18 1 1 7 10 1 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 10 0 0 0 7 32 32 22 14 9 3 4 4 4 1 0 3 50 23 11 9 12 26 10 30 4 11 3 18 5 8 6 3 49 46 42 27 23 28 26 15 11 8 0 0 2620 4050 372 41 279 531 1 6 73 39 1 7 0 0 0 46 0 0 460 4890 0 0 0 94 127 302 401 74 575 60 716 712 42 8 0 150 423 414 116 163 1095 10219 2205 12302 87 531 93 705 8 56 100 8 3683 7355 6746 3840 394 790 986 245 114 141 0 0 1161 1458 115 21 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 16 142 0 0 0 0 0 95 136 18 17 2 4 132 2 0 0 14 327 143 34 76 81 780 266 1405 18 6 2 35 0 0 0 0 628 1055 1107 617 96 79 82 30 72 8 0 0 44.3 36.0 30.9 51.2 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 3.5 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.5 33.9 24.3 3.0 3.3 0.6 18.5 4.8 0.0 0.0 9.3 77.3 34.5 29.3 46.6 7.4 7.6 12.1 11.4 20.7 1.1 2.2 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.1 14.3 16.4 16.1 24.4 10.0 8.3 12.2 63.2 5.7 0.0 0.0 Sheep Goat 2015 Cow Sheep Goat 2017 Cow Sheep Goat 2018 Cow Sheep Goat 2019 Cow Sheep Goat 2022 Cow (Contd...) Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916 514 Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.17/March-2024/1.pdf Table-1: (Continued). Year Animal species Region Number of outbreaks Number of suspected cases Number of affected animals Infection rate (%) Sheep Center East West South Center East West South 2 8 0 1 2 5 0 0 16 989 0 35 4 210 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Goat the disease, with an average infection rate of 49.5%. In contrast, sheep and goats exhibited infection rates of 10.1% and 7.7%, respectively. Tizi-Ouzou, known for significant dairy production in Algeria, witnessed a notable spread of FMDV, potentially attributed to livestock trade within animal market. FMDV, characterized by rapid replication within infected animals and transmission to susceptible animals in close proximity, including through aerosol transmission, likely contributed to the extensive outbreak in Tizi-Ouzou [1]. As in the case of previous outbreaks, immediate vaccination campaigns targeting cattle with a bivalent vaccine containing serotypes A and O were launched following the identification of this disease. Temporary closure of livestock markets has been conducted, and newly acquired animals have been placed under quarantine as part of the control measures. In 2019, Algeria reported 278 FMD outbreaks with no clinical infection in bovine species; however, 3,694 confirmed cases occurred in sheep. In addition, there was a relatively high incidence of infection among goats, affecting 287 animals. These findings are mainly based on comprehensive veterinary control measures targeting cattle populations across multiple wilayas. All essential preventive measures have been rigorously enforced to prevent this epizootic disease and minimize the risk of livestock infection. Despite the stringent implementation of preventive measures and directives regarding the culling of infected animals, resistance persists among some farmers, presenting a challenge to containment efforts. Inspection teams have successfully mobilized all necessary human and material resources to effectively control disease outbreaks, with particular emphasis on enclaves and border regions. To ensure effective control of animal health in the region, officials have called for involving relevant authorities and associations. Coordination meetings were held with livestock breeders to assess herd sensitivity and locations, strategize vaccination campaigns, outline preventive measures necessary to protect animal health in border areas, and coordinate the mobilization of mixed brigades in cooperation with Saharawi refugees to vaccinate valuable animals. Algeria remained free from reported FMD outbreaks in 2020 and 2021, underscoring the continued effectiveness of comprehensive FMD control measures implemented in response to the 2018–2019 Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916 outbreaks. However, a resurgence occurred in 2022, with 37 outbreaks reported in nine provinces. Among ruminant species, bovines exhibited the highest average infection rate, emphasizing the persistent need for vigilance and effective FMD control strategies. The recurrence of FMD outbreaks in Algeria can be attributed to different factors. Insufficient vaccination coverage in susceptible animal populations is a significant contributor to FMD outbreak recurrence [30]. Challenges, such as inadequate vaccination campaigns and difficulties in reaching remote areas, can lead to the existence of pockets of vulnerable animals [31], highlighting the need for comprehensive vaccination programs. In addition, the persistence of FMDV in the environment, particularly in contaminated equipment, clothing, or vehicles, can introduce the virus to new areas or herds even after initial control [32]. This highlights the need for strict biosecurity measures to prevent virus transmission through fomites and other environmental sources. In addition, wild animals, especially cloven-hoofed species, can sometimes act as reservoirs for FMDV [33], emphasizing their role in carrying and transmitting the virus to domestic livestock. Movement of infected animals or contaminated products between regions can facilitate the geographical spread of FMD. Moreover, considerations related to the virus itself are crucial. Recent research indicates that FMD virus can undergo genetic changes, potentially leading to the emergence of new strains or serotypes [34]. These genetic variants may not be effectively covered by existing vaccines, leading to recurrence. To address the evolving nature of the virus, ongoing surveillance and vaccine development efforts are essential. In addition, favorable temperature and humidity conditions create an environment conducive to the survival and transmission of the FMDV [35]. These conditions can enhance the persistence of the virus in the environment, potentially leading to increased transmission. Furthermore, human activities such as handling infected animals, improper disposal of carcasses, and accidental virus release from laboratories contribute to the recurrence of FMD outbreaks. These activities pose a risk of introducing the virus into new areas or populations and highlight the need for strict biosecurity measures and responsible practices to mitigate these risks. 515 Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.17/March-2024/1.pdf Conclusion References The temporal distribution of FMD in Algeria from 2014 to 2022 showed significant variability, which was influenced by factors such as inadequate control measures, difficulties in regulating livestock movements, changes in diagnostic procedures, and free trade policies. In view of the significant economic impact and transboundary nature of the disease, these findings highlight the need for the Algerian government to strengthen regional control programs and surveillance systems. To effectively combat FMD in Algeria, a multifaceted approach is recommended. First, comprehensive education initiatives for cattle farmers should focus on the benefits of vaccination and active participation in control programs. Concurrently, consider the re-establishment of quarantine stations to monitor the movement of cattle and prevent disease spread. In addition, significant investment in the development of a novel vaccine offering long-term protection and reduced post-vaccination responses is crucial. This technological advancement would substantially enhance FMD prevention and control efforts in the country. Implementing these strategies together can mitigate the impact of FMD and protect the livestock industry in Algeria, thus contributing to regional and international FMD control efforts. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Authors’ Contributions MG, MA, MD, and RB: Played essential roles in collecting official statistics and analyzing official records. MG, MA, and MD: Initiated and guided the conceptualization of the study, conducted extensive literature search, and data compilation. MG and RB: Analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript with substantial input and revisions from all authors. All authors have read, reviewed, and approved the manuscript. Acknowledgments We extend our heartfelt gratitude to the Algerian Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MADR), the Algerian Ministry of Public Health (MPH), and the Department of Animal Health (DAH) of MARD for their valuable contributions to this study. Their collaboration and data provision were instrumental in the successful completion of this research. We appreciate their commitment to improving scientific knowledge and their support in addressing the challenges facing animal health in Algeria. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. 16. Publisher’s Note Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published map and institutional affiliation. Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916 17. Grubman, M.J. and Baxt B. (2004) Foot-and-mouth disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 17(2): 465–493. Jamal, S.M. and Belsham, G.J. (2013) Foot-and-mouth disease: Past, present and future. Vet. Res., 44(1): 116. Estevez Garcia, A.I., Lefebvre, D.J., Nyabongo, L., Haegeman, A., Nkundwanayo, C., De Vleeschauwer, A., Ntakirutimana, D., De Leeuw, I., Nsanganiyumwami, D., Niyokwizera, P., Van den Berg, T., Niyokwishimira, A. and Clercq, K. (2022) Outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease in Burundi, East Africa, in 2016, caused by different serotypes. Viruses, 14(5): 1077. Rowlands, D.J., Cartwright, B. and Brown F. (1969) Evidence for an internal antigen in foot-and-mouth disease virus. J. Gen. Virol., 4(4): 479–487. FAO/OIE. (2012) Ensuring Excellence and Ethics of the Veterinary Profession. In: The FAO/OIE Global Conference on Foot and Mouth Disease Control. FAO/OIE, Bangkok, Thailand. Diaz-San Segundo, F., Dias, C.C., Moraes, M.P., Weiss, M., Perez-Martin, E., Salazar, A.M., Grubman, M.J. and De Los Santos, T. (2014) Poly ICLC increases the potency of a replication-defective human adenovirus vectored foot-andmouth disease vaccine. Virology, 468–470: 283–292. Mwiine, F.N., Ayebazibwe, C., Alexandersen, S., OlahoMukani, W., Okurut Ademun, A. and Tjornehoj, K. (2010) Seroepidemiological investigation of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotypes in cattle around Lake Mburo National Park in south-western Uganda. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Health, 2: 46–54. Namatovu,A.,Belsham,G.J.,Ayebazibwe,C.,Dhikusooka,M.T., Wekesa, S.N., Siegismund, H.R., Muwanika, V.B. and Tjornehoj, K. (2015) Challenges for serology-based characterization of foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in endemic areas; identification of two separate lineages of serotype O FMDV in Uganda in 2011. Transbound. Emerg. Dis., 62(5): 522–534. Li, K., Wang, C., Yang, F., Cao, W., Zhu, Z. and Zheng H. (2021) Virus-host interactions in foot-and-mouth disease virus infection. Front. Immunol., 12: 571509. Mahmoud, M.A. and Galbat, S.A. (2017) Outbreak of foot and mouth disease and peste des petits ruminants in sheep flock imported for immediate slaughter in Riyadh. Vet. World, 10(2): 238–243. Feng, S., Patton, M. and Davis, J. (2017) Market impact of foot-and-mouth disease control strategies: A UK case study. Front. Vet. Sci., 4: 129. Adamchick, J., Rich, K.M. and Perez, A.M. (2021) Assessment of the risk of foot and mouth disease among beef cattle at slaughter from East African production systems. Viruses, 13(12): 2407. Knight-Jones, T.J.D. and Rushton, J. (2013) The economic impacts of foot and mouth disease - what are they, how big are they and where do they occur? Prev. Vet. Med., 112(3–4): 161–173. Moustafa, K. and Pam, D.L. (2016) Molecular epidemiology of foot and mouth disease, bluetongue and pest de petites ruminants in Algeria: Historical perspective, diagnosis and control. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 15(44): 2474–2479. Woldemariyamm, F.T., Leta, S., Assefa, Z., Tekeba, E., Gebrewold, D.S. and Paeshuyse J. (2022) Temporal and spatial patterns and a space-time cluster analysis of footand-mouth disease outbreaks in Ethiopia from 2010 to 2019. Viruses, 14(7): 1558. Barasa, M., Catley, A., Machuchu, D., Laqua, H., Puot, E., Tap Kot, D. and Ikiror, D. (2008) Foot-and-mouth disease vaccination in South Sudan: Benefit-cost analysis and livelihoods impact. Transbound. Emerg. Dis., 55(8): 339–351. McElwain, T.F. and Thumbi, S.M. (2017) Animal pathogens and their impact on animal health, the economy, food security, food safety and public health. Rev. Sci. Tech., 36(2): 516 Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.17/March-2024/1.pdf 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 423–433. Moula, N., Salhi, A., Touazi, L. and Philippe, F.X. (2015) Greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production in rural area of Algeria, the case of Chemini (Kabylie). Livest. Res Rural Dev., 27. Available from: http://www.lrrd.org/ lrrd27/10/moul27194.html. Retrieved on 24-02-2024. Siad, O., Deghnouche, K., Andrighetto, I., Contiero, B., Marchesini, G., Bedjaoui, H., Chala A. and Cortese, M. (2022) Traits of intensive livestock systems in Algerian steppe territories. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 21(1): 41–50. Bessaoud, O., Pellissier, J.P., Rolland, J.P. and Khechimi, W. (2019) Rapport de Synthèse sur L’agriculture en Algérie. Sinkala, Y., Simuunza, M., Muma, J.B., Pfeiffer, D.U., Kasanga, C.J. and Mweene, A. (2014) Foot and mouth disease in Zambia: Spatial and temporal distributions of outbreaks, assessment of clusters and implications for control. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res., 81(2): E1–E6. WRLFMD. (2017) WRLFMD Quarterly Report January to March 2017, Foot-and-Mouth Disease. The Pirbright Institute, England. Baazizi, R., Tellai, H.S., Mimoune, N., Chahed, A., Saidi, R., Khelef, D. and Kaidi, R. (2021) First incursion and evolution of foot and mouth disease during 2018–2019 outbreaks in Ghardaia district, Algeria. Agricultura, 118(1–2): 94–104. Baazizi, R., Mimoune, N., Mokhefi, M.E., Raza, M., Chahed, A. and Hussain, T. (2019) Knowledge and behavior of cattle and sheep owners and herders regarding footand-mouth disease in Northern Algeria. Vet. World, 12(8): 1285–1290. WRLFMD. (2015) WRLFMD Quarterly Report October to December 2015, Reference Laboratory Contract Report, Foot-and-Mouth Disease. The Pirbright Institute, England. Bravo de Rueda, C., De Jong, M.C., Eble, P.L. and Dekker, A. (2014) Estimation of the transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus from infected sheep to cattle. Vet. Res., 45(1): 58. Thiry, E. and Baazizi, R. (1999) Foot and mouth disease: the properties of the virus explain its high contagiousness 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. (Original title: La fièvre aphteuse: Les propriétés du virus expliquent sa grande contagiosité). Bull. Des GTV, 4: 260–270. WRLFMD. (2018) WRLFMD Quarterly Report January to March 2018, Foot-and-Mouth Disease. The Pirbright Institute, England. WAHIS. and World Organisation for Animal Health. (2018) Algeria-Foot and Mouth Disease Virus. EVENT 2597. Available from: https://wahis.woah.org/#/in-event/2597/ dashboard. Retrieved on 03-12-2023. Athambawa, M.J., Kubota, S. and Kono, H. (2021) Knowledge affecting foot-and-mouth disease vaccination behavior: Traditional dairy farmers in the dry zone of Sri Lanka. Trop. Anim. Health. Prod., 53(1): 88. Xaydalasouk, K., Innoula, N., Putthana,V., Chanthavongsa, K., Snoeck, C.J., Hubschen, J.M., Oudomphone, P., Chan, B., Muller, C.P., Black, A.P., Pommasichan, S. and Pauly, M. (2021) High seroprevalence of foot and mouth disease in Laos: Call for nationwide vaccination campaigns and disease surveillance. Transbound. Emerg. Dis., 68(4): 2345–2352. Mielke, S.R., Lendzele, S., Delgado,A.H.,Abdoulmoumini,M., Dickmu, S. and Garabed, R. (2023) Patterns of foot-andmouth disease virus detection in environmental samples in an endemic setting. Front. Vet. Sci., 10: 1157538. Fukai, K., Kawaguchi, R., Nishi, T., Ikezawa, M., Yamada, M., Seeyo, K.B. and Morioka, K. (2022) Risk of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease by wild animals: infection dynamics in Japanese wild boar following direct inoculation or contact exposure. Vet. Res., 53(1): 86. Dahiya, S.S., Subramaniam, S., Mohapatra, J.K., Rout, M., Biswal, J.K., Giri, P., Nayak, V. and Singh, R.P. (2023) Foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype O exhibits phenomenal genetic lineage diversity in India during 2018–2022. Viruses, 15(7): 1529. Bouguedour, R. and Ripani, A. (2016) Review of the foot and mouth disease situation in North Africa and the risk of introducing the disease into Europe. Rev. Sci. Tech., 35(3): 757–768. ******** Veterinary World, EISSN: 2231-0916 517