Aalborg Universitet
Overtopping Measurements on the Wave Dragon Nissum Bredning Prototype
Frigaard, Peter; Kofoed, Jens Peter; Rasmussen, Michael R.
Published in:
The Proceedings of The Fourteenth (2004) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
Publication date:
2004
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Link to publication from Aalborg University
Citation for published version (APA):
Frigaard, P., Kofoed, J. P., & Rasmussen, M. R. (2004). Overtopping Measurements on the Wave Dragon
Nissum Bredning Prototype. In J. S. Chung, K. Izumiyama, M. Sayed, & S. W. Hong (Eds.), The Proceedings of
The Fourteenth (2004) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference (14 ed., pp. 210-216). The
International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
General rights
Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners
and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.
- Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.
- You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain
- You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at vbn@aub.aau.dk providing details, and we will remove access to
the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from vbn.aau.dk on: December 31, 2023
Proceedings of The Fourteenth (2004) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
Toulon, France, May 23−28, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers
ISBN 1-880653-62-1 (Set); ISSN 1098-6189 (Set)
Overtopping Measurements on the
Wave Dragon Nissum Bredning Prototype.
Peter Frigaard1, Jens Peter Kofoed1 & Michael R. Rasmussen1
1
Depart. Civil Engineering, Aalborg University
Aalborg, Denmark
ABSTRACT
The paper describes the methods used to estimate (calculated
from some indirect measurements) the overtopping of the
wave energy converter Wave Dragon placed in a real sea
environment. The wave energy converter in quistion is the
237-tonne heavy Wave Dragon Nissum Bredning Prototype.
Comparisons are made with laboratory measurements of the
overtopping of a laboratory-scale model.
KEY WORDS: Wave Energy; Overtopping; Prototype Testing;
Wave Dragon; Low-Pressure Turbine; Scale E ects;
INTRODUCTION
Figure 2: Location of the Nissum Bredning Prototype
waves towards a ramp, a oating reservoir for collecting the
overtopping water, and some hydroturbines for converting the
pressure head into power.
Over the period 1998 to 2001, extensive testing on a scale 1:50
model was carried out at Aalborg University. During recent
months, testing has started on a prototype of the Wave Dragon
in Nissum Bredning, Denmark (scale 1:4.5 o the North Sea).
Figure 1: The Wave Dragon Nissum Bredning Prototype.
The Wave Dragon is an o shore wave energy converter of the
overtopping type. 4-11 MW if placed in the North Sea. For the
Nissum Bredning 18.2 kW is installed.
Figure 2 shows the location of the Nissum Bredning Prototype,
indicated on the map by the ellipse. The Nissum Broads
(Nissum Bredning) are just o the North Sea, separated from
it by two tongues of land.
Basically it consists of two oating wave re ectors focusing the
210
Figure 3 shows the average wave energy density in the Broads.
The upper arrow on the gure indicates the present location
of the Nissum Bredning Prototype; the lower arrow shows the
most exposed location in the Broads, to which the machine
will be moved during early summer 2004.
(calculated from indirect measurements) of the Nissum Bredning Prototype with overtopping rates measured in a hydraulic
laboratory using a scale 1:50 model (scale 1:11.1 relative to the
Nissum Bredning Prototype).
THE WAVE DRAGON CONCEPT
The present location was chosen to test the functionality of
the machine, as easier access to the machine makes it possible
to sort out the inevitable 'teething troubles' before deploying
it in the most exposed position.
The Wave Dragon consists of three main elements:
Two wave re ectors focusing the waves towards the ramp,
linked to the main structure. The wave re ectors have
the veri ed e ect of increasing the signi cant wave height
substantially, and thereby increase the energy captured
by approx. 100% under typical wave conditions.
The main structure consisting of a doubly curved ramp
and a reservoir.
A set of low head Kaplan-propeller turbines for converting
the hydraulic head in the reservoir into electricity.
The Nissum Bredning Prototype was grid connected at its rst
location (upper arrow on gure 3), thus making it the world's
rst o shore wave energy converter.
Figure 4: The Basic principle of the Wave Dragon.
When the waves overtop the ramp, this water is lled into the
oating reservoir at a higher level than the surrounding sea, and
this hydraulic head is utilized for power production through the
specially designed hydroturbines.
Figure 3: Energy density in Nissum Bredning. The
gure also
shows the 2 di erent locations where the machine will be placed.
The Wave Dragon Nissum Bredning Prototype has a total
weight of 237 tonnes, still it is only a scale 1:4.5 of the eventual
North Sea Prototype.
Through an advanced phenumatic system it is possible to adjust
the oating level. The entire main body of the Wave Dragon
can be raised or lowered, and in this way the crest freeboard can
be varied in order to maximize energy output from the Wave
Dragon under the sea conditions prevailing at any time. This
level adjustment happens continuously. The used time scale for
the operation corresponds to approx. 250 wave periods.
Over the next 2 years, an extensive measuring program will
establish the background for optimal design of the structure
and regulation of the power take-o system. Planning for a
full scale deployment within the next 2-3 years is in progress
(Srensen et. al. 2003). Such a structure will probably be
placed somewhere in the North Sea, or in the North Atlantic
Ocean.
Knowledge about overtopping rates is privotal for establishing
the optimal regulation strategy for the Wave Dragon and for
the eÆciency achievable from the Wave Dragon. What is the
optimal oating level for a given sea condition? When is the
optimal time to switch on or switch o the turbines?
The Nissum Bredning Prototype is instrumented to monitor
power production, wave climate, forces in mooring lines,
stresses in the structure, and movements of the Wave Dragon
reservoir and the re ecting arms.
Equations predicting average overtopping rates for the Wave
Dragon were rst established through tank tests at Aalborg
University on a scale 1:50 model in 1998-1999 (Martinelli and
Frigaard 1999).
The present paper compares the estimated overtopping rates
211
Hald and Frigaard 2001 reported overtopping from the tests
with the second-generation model, and presented a modi ed
overtopping equation:
Martinelli and Frigaard 1999 tested the Wave Dragon in longcrested seas as well as in short-crested seas with some standard
JONSWAP spectra. They presented the following equation to
predict overtopping (linear ramp inclination 45 deg.):
qS
R
= 0:017cd exp( 48 Hcs
q
where,
c
=
=
L
=
q
d
op
p
=
=
s
c
=
=
S
T
H
R
op )
2
p
L gH 3
p
q
s
Sop
2
discharge due to overtopping
reduction coeÆcient accounting for
directional spreading e ects, cd =
0:9
length of structure ramp; a length
of 86.6 meter was assumed
(21.3 meter for the Nissum Bredning Prototype)
g 2
Hs =Lop ; whereLop =
2 Tp
peak period; a constant ratio 1.2
between the peak and the mean period was assumed
signi cant wave height
crest freeboard
Rc
= 0:025cd exp( 40 H
s
qS
p
p
op L gHs3
2 )
Sop
2
Figure 6: Dimensionless overtopping relation.
The Wave Dragon model tested by Martinelli and Frigaard
1999 turned out to have some rather large movements;
consequently the dynamic behavour of the model was slightly
changed.
Figure 6 shows the test data from Hald and Frigaard 2001.
Tests rst carried out using the original model layout in
Martinelli and Frigaard 1999 were repeated by Hald and
Frigaard 2001; these tests are labelled Test series A and Test
series B in the gure. A reasonable t with the Martinelli
and Frigaard 1999 equation (full line) is seen. Test series C
and D represent minor modi cations made to the re ector
draught; resulting in a small increase in the overtopping. Test
series E to J represent data measured on the model with the
doubly curved overtopping ramp implemented. The e ect of
the doubly curved ramp is clearly seen. The Hald and Frigaard
equation (dotted line) is also shown on the gure together with
the original data points.
Kofoed 2003 tested various slope layouts in order to nd a
structure producing the maximum overtopping e ect. Kofoed's
tests veri ed a doubly curved ramp to have a signi cantly
positive e ect.
Incorporating these changes, a second-generation model was
constructed and tested at Aalborg University in 2001. A photo
of the model and the prototype can be seen in gure 5.
All data shown in gure 6 represent 5 standard wave conditions. Each data point corresponds to a test including approx.
1000 waves in a controlled wave environment. In table 1 the
wave conditions are listed in North Sea scale. The reason for
choosing the Nissum Broads location for the 1:4.5 scale model
of the Wave Dragon was indeed the fact that the wave climate
in Nissum Broads corresponds very well with the wave climate
in the North Sea, scaled by 4.5.
Situation
[-]
1
2
3
4
5
s
H
m
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
T
p
sec.
5.6
7.0
8.4
9.8
11.2
Frequency
% of time
46.7
22.6
10.8
5.1
2.4
Energy
MWhmyear
8.2
23.8
30.2
29.4
24.3
Tabel 1: Tested wave situations.
In addition, an overtopping simulation software tool had to be
developed, allowing real time simulations of overtopping rates
Figure 5: Photo showing the doubly curved ramp.
212
The regulation strategy for the Wave Dragon consists of 2 steps.
First, the optimal crest freeboard ( oat level) for the actual
sea condition is calculated. For this calculation a time scale
corresponding to approx. 250 wave periods is used. Second,
the 'work span' for the turbines needs to be de ned. The 'work
span' is de ned as the the accepted variation in the water level
in the reservoir. Once the water level reaches the top of the
'work span' in question, all turbines will be switched on. And
correspondingly, when the water level reaches the lowest level
of the 'work span' all turbines will be switched o .
(Jacobsen and Frigaard 1999). The design of the reservoir and
the turbine con guration of the Wave Dragon had to be based
on a reasonable input discharge history. The time history was
considered a random process, and it was generated according
to a distribution of overtopping volumes per wave consolidated
in literature and mean values obtained by the tests previously
described.
The probability of occurrence of wave overtopping for vertical
structures, cf. Franco et al. 1994 and for rubble mound dikes,
cf. van der Meer and Janssen 1995, can be given in the form of
a Rayleigh type distribution:
ov
P
Rc )2 )
= exp( ( cH
s
where,
=
c
a constant; set to 1.21
c can be interpreted as a roughness factor.
According to van der Meer and Janssen 1995, the distribution
of the overtopping volumes of the individual waves, given that
overtopping takes place, is given by a Weibull distribution with
shape parameter 0.75:
V jov
P
= P (V
mean
V
j
0:75
( ( Vmean
)
a )
)=1
o
exp
where,
m
=
=
=
ov
=
a
q
T
P
mean
V
j
o
=
qTm
Pov
mean overtopping discharge
mean wave period; a constant ratio
1.2 between the peak and the mean
period was assumed.
the probability of overtopping given
in the equation above
mean overtopping of wave, given
wave is overtopping
Note that the scale factor a used for the quanti cation of the
overtopping, given that overtopping takes place, is the average
overtopped volume, magni ed due to the 'average' overtopping
probability.
The probability Pv , that a generic wave (the comming wave) is
associated to a overtopping volume V less or equal to Vmean is:
P
v
= P (V
mean ) = PV jov
V
ov
P
Kofoed and Burchart (2000) veri ed the equations giving the
time variations of the overtopping for smooth slopes
TURBINE CONFIGURATION
In order to maximize energy output from the Wave Dragon,
the machine is equipped with several small turbines rather than
one larger turbine. In this way it is possible e.g. to switch on
only a part of the installed power in sea conditions producing
relatively small amounts of overtopping water. Furthermore
this construction allows a single small turbine to be switched
on or switched o depending on the actual amount of water
coming from a single wave.
Figure 7: Kaplan turbine with cylinder gate.
A number of di erent strategies to control this mechanism will
be tested in the coming years in order to maximize energy output. For the time being, the 'work span' is simply divided into
a number of distances.
213
Ideally, the Wave Dragon would be equipped with several similar small turbines; however, the actual turbine con guration is a
result of compromises brought on by nancial constraints rather
than logical, optimal technical solutions. Like most other wave
energy projects, the Wave Dragon project had to adjust the turbine con guration according to the available funds. Therefore,
the Wave Dragon is equipped with 3 di erent types of turbines:
A Kaplan turbine with Siphon inlet, see gure 9. The turbine was developed through the EU CRAFT project: Low{
Pressure Turbine and Control Equipment for Wave Energy
Converters (Wave Dragon). Diameter of the Siphon turbine is 0.34 meter, and area of cross section is 0.0908 m2 .
Rated power output is 2.6 kW (500 kW for the North Sea
Wave Dragon). Calibrated ow is 0.22 M 3 =sec: at 0.5 meter head.
3 Dummy turbines, see gure 8. The turbines are not able
to produce power, but simply let the overtopped water
run back into the sea through a set of calibrated valves.
Diameter of the valves are 0.43 meter, and area A of cross
section is 0.147 m2 . The discharge Q through the dummy
turbines
was calibrated to follow the equation Q = k
p2gh, (h=pressure
A
head). For the 3 dummy turbines
the k-values were found to be 1.05, 1.07 and 1.09 (Knapp
and Riemann 2003).
6 Kaplan turbines with cylinder gates, see gure 7. These
turbines have data similar to the 'Siphon' Kaplan turbine.
Diameter of these turbines is 0.34 meter. Rated power
output is 2.6 kWatt. Calibrated ow 0.22 m3 =sec at a head
of 0.5 meter. The turbines were fabricated in Austria by
Kossler, and were installed in September 2003. Installation
of gear and generators were nished February 2004.
Figure 9: Kaplan turbine with Siphon inlet
some uncertainty. In particular, it must be stressed that the
actual amount of water passing the turbines will be slightly
lower than calculated, as the ow through the turbines is not
linearly depending on the head. However, relative to the typical
duration of the operations of the turbines (open valves), the
duration of the opening of and closing processes of the valves
are insubstantial.
WAVE MEASUREMENTS IN NISSUM BREDNING
Waves are measured indirectly through a pressure transducer
placed approx. 2 meter under the sea surface. The pressure
transducer is mounted on an arm attached to the mooring pile of
the Wave Dragon. The transformation from pressure to surface
is done by linear wave theory.
Wave parameters are calculated continuously in a 17 minutes
long time window. The length of the time window corresponds
to 250 - 300 waves. Zero down crossing analyses are performed
and the average period Tm is used to characterize the waves.
The peak periods Tp of the spectra are assumed to be Tp =
1:2 Tm .
PROTOTYPE OVERTOPPING
The Wave Dragon oats on air chambers to make it possible to
adjust the oating level of the machine. Therefore, scale e ects
have to be considered, and tank tests are not directly scalable.
Scale e ects will mainly be presented on the movements of the
Wave Dragon, and laboratory tests have shown that the overtopping is very strongly depending on the movements. It must
be mentioned that movements have been measured in all laboratory tests, and that the Nissum Bredning Prototype is equipped
with 6 accelerometers in order to measure movements. Analyses of the movements have still to be performed.
Figure 8: The 3 'dummy' turbines.
Based on measurements of the instantaneous pressure head, and
knowing the number of currently open turbines, it is possible to
calculate the ow through the turbines. The opening period is
de ned as the period from starting time of the opening process
to starting time of the closing process. Obviously the periods
of the opening and closing operations will be accompanied by
During the winter of 2003/2004 and over the coming winter,
overtopping results have been and will be collected continuously, in periods without down time of the instruments.
214
Obtaining measurements in a real sea condition is diÆcult. And
it has indeed turned out to be even more diÆcult and timeconsuming than expected. The sea is extremely rough on the
instruments. Nevertheless, throughout the months of November
and December 2003 average overtopping rates have been successfully monitored on the Nissum Bredning Prototype, both
under ordinary conditions and under storm conditions (Kofoed
and O'Donovan 2003).
Figure 10 also demonstrates the frequency for the turbines to
be switched on (and later switched o ). The situation seen on
the gure corresponds to a turbine being switched on almost
every 10 second in average.
It is assumed that all water overtopping the ramp passes
through the turbines. This means that no spill is expected.
Visual inspections support this assumption; at least in calmer
wave conditions.
where,
The outlet is calculated as:
Q
overtop
F
=
=
=
=
G
=
i
N
h
Therefore, an estimate of the overtopping amount can be calculated, knowing the characteristics of the turbines, the head
of the free surface and the opening time of the turbines.
Figure 10 gives an example of the measurements. Unfortunately,it is diÆcult to see the measurements clearly in the gure; however, the purpose of including the plot is to give an
idea of the variations in the signals.
'
Q
out
=
R PN
i
time
=1
i (h)Gi dt
F
turbine number
number of installed turbines
instantaneous head in reservoir
calibrated function describing ow out
through a turbine
function describing whether the turbine
valve is opened or closed. At present this
function can only take the values 0 or 1.
The overtopping data from the Nissum Bredning Prototype
show good agreement with the laboratory overtopping data,
although slightly more overtopping is seen on the Nissum Bredning Prototype than expected from the laboratory.
The x-axis represents the time. The length of the axis is 5 minutes corresponding to a little less than 100 waves.
Figure 11 gives an example of such a comparison.
0.003
Prototype data
3
2
Q*=q*sqrt(s op/(2 p ))/(sqrt(g H s L )
The y-axis shows 5 curves: 'work span' (in this example app.
10 cm), water level within 'work span' (in this example 0% 100%), number of running turbines (0-10 in the example), wave
height (approx 50 cm in the example) and water level in reservoir (50-60 cm in the example).
Hald & Frigaard (2001)
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
R*=Rc/Hs*sqrt(s op/(2p))
Figure 11: Example of Overtopping results
In the near future, much more data covering a larger parameter range can be expected. Hopefully, this will lead to
more detailed conclusions. For the time being, however, we
nd it surprising, that the data do in fact correspond so well.
Normally, overtopping data show an enormous scatter, even for
laboratory data. A factor of 5-10 is not unusual in literature.
However, for the conditions with large amounts of overtopping
less scatter is normally seen.
Figure 10: Measured data as shown in the control program.
In the controlled laboratory environment, the waves were
generated, Rayleigh distributed, with a standard JONSWAP
spectrum and a standard groupiness factor. The sea conditions
were kept constant for a period corresponding to 1000 waves.
In the real sea in Nissum Broads, the wave conditions are
much more scattered.
From gure 10 each individual wave can be recognized as a
change in the water level in the reservoir. This can be seen
most clearly when studying the curve for the water level within
the 'work span' (red curve).
215
It seems like, very few scale e ects can be observed. The Wave
Dragon oats on an air cushion, which means that in order to
establish a correct model, the sti ness of this air cushion has
had to be scaled. Such a scaling is very diÆcult to implement
correctly, and a certain amount of scale e ects was to be
expected.
Hald, Tue and Frigaard, Peter (2001): Forces and Overtopping
on 2. generation Wave Dragon for Nissum Bredning. Phase 3
project, Danish Energy Agency. Project no: ENS-51191/000067. Hydraulics & Coastal Engineering Laboratory, Aalborg
University.
Jacobsen, K.P. and Frigaard, P. (1999): User's manual for
the Program Wave Dragon { Power Simulation. Aalborg
University.
Measurements of the movements of the Nissum Bredning
Prototype have not been analysed yet, but based on several
visits and a preliminary look at the data, we think that some
scale e ects are present on the movements (larger movements
in laboratory).
Knapp, W. and Riemann, S. (2003): Measurements on Wave
Dragon, Nissum Bredning on 24th of May 2003: Dummy turbine calibration. Laboratorium fur Hydraulische Maschinen,
Technische Universitat Munchen.
CONCLUSION
Overtopping has been measured on the Nissum Bredning
Prototype of the Wave Dragon. The functionality of the Wave
Dragon overtopping concept has been proven.
Kofoed J. P. and Burcharth H. F. (2000): Experimental veri cation of an empirical model for time variation of overtopping
discharge. 4. European Wave Energy Conference (EWEC
2000), Aalborg, Denmark, Dec. 2000.
Good agreement to laboratory-based overtopping equations
was found, although some more overtopping was measured in
the Nissum Bredning Prototype.
Kofoed J. P., Frigaard P., H. C. Srensen and E. Friis-Madsen
(2000): Development of the Wave Energy Converter - Wave
Dragon. ISOPE-2000, Seattle, USA, May, 2000.
The extra overtopping is assumed to originate from wind
e ects, and from scale e ects on the movements of the Wave
Dragon.
Kofoed J. P.(2003): Wave Overtopping of Marine Structures
- Utilization of Wave Energy. Ph. D. Thesis, defended
January 17, 2003 at Aalborg University. Department of Civil
Engineering.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Kofoed, J. P. and O'Donovan, E. (2003): Status report First o shore experiences, Wave Dragon, Nissum bredning.
Hydraulics & Coastal Engineering Laboratory, Aalborg University, September 2003. (Con dential).
The Wave Dragon has recieved support from The European
Commission, The Danish Energy Agency and several private
companies and foundations. Please see homepage for a full list.
MORE INFORMATION
Martinelli, L. and Frigaard, P. (1999): The Wave Dragon: 3D
overtopping tests on a oating model. Low-Pressure Turbine
and Control Equipment for Wave Energy Converters (Wave
Dragon), contract JOR3-CT98-7027. Aalborg University.
Futher information on the project can be found at one of
the Web pages: www.wavedragon.net or www.civil.aau.dk for
further information on the project.
H.C. Srensen, E. Friis-Madsen, W. Panhauser, D. Dunce, J.
Nedkvinte, P. Frigaard, J.P. Kofoed, W. Knapp, S. Riemann,
E. Holmen, A. Raulund, J. Prst, L.K. Hansen, L. Christensen,
T. Nohrlind, T. Bree, P. McCullen (2003): Development of
Wave Dragon from Scale 1:50 to Prototype. Proc. 5th
European Wave Energy Conference, Cork Ireland.
REFERENCES
Franco, L., Gerlone, M.D. and Van der Meer, J.W. (1994):
Wave overtopping at vertical and composite breakwaters. Proc
24th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, Kobe,
Japan. ASCE.
Van der Meer, J.W. and Janssen, J. P. F. M. (1995): Wave
Run Up and Wave Overtopping at Dikes. Task Committee
Reports, ASCE.
216