Alissa Trotz: Sexual Violence and the State in Guyana: Reflecting on the Colwyn Harding Case
Sexual Violence and the State in
Guyana: Reflecting on the Colwyn
Harding Case1
Alissa Trotz
Associate Professor, Caribbean Studies
New College and Women and Gender Studies, University of Toronto, Canada
Key words: Torture, sodomy, police, human rights, force, activism
On January 10, 2014, a story surfaced in the Kaieteur News in Guyana of
Colwyn Harding, a 23-year old African-Guyanese man hospitalized at the
Georgetown Public Hospital (GPH). Harding suffered severe internal injuries
allegedly caused in November 2013 when police apprehended him at the
house of a friend after some goods were reported stolen (someone else was
later identified and arrested). 2 According to Harding, in addition to being
beaten, he was sodomized by a constable with a condom covered wooden
police baton in the presence of members of the Community Policing Group.
Four persons (Harding, a 12-year old boy and two women, Teneisha Edwards
and Tiffany Evans) were then taken to the Timehri police station where it was
alleged further abuses took place in plain sight of other officers: the 12-year old
was handcuffed to a bed; Harding was violently beaten again and left in a cell
despite the fact that he was clearly in severe physical distress and orders were
given for him to be taken for medical attention; and Tiffany Edwards, two
months pregnant at the time, accused the same officer who had sexually
violated Colwyn Harding of kicking her in her stomach, causing a miscarriage
later.
351
www.sta.uwi.edu/crgs/index.asp
UWI IGDS CRGS Issue 8
ISSN 1995-1108
After spending four days in jail, Harding, Edwards and Evans were formally
charged on November 19 with assaulting a police officer and disorderly
conduct. Unable to raise bail, Edwards and Harding were remanded to prison.3
In mid-December, suffering from severe pain, Harding was eventually admitted
to the GPH (he would spend some 33 days), where he underwent surgeries for
an incarcerated inguinal hernia, with a significant portion of his intestines having
to be removed. He remained handcuffed to his bed at the GPH at the time that
his story became public, and the handcuffs were only removed on January 17,
despite the fact that at least four days earlier he had been granted bail on his
own recognizance. Harding was eventually discharged and readmitted to a
private hospital where he received an independent medical examination, and
in February funds were raised by the public that facilitated his travel to Jamaica
for further examination and diagnosis.
Investigations into Harding’s allegations only kicked into high gear after
widespread outrage condemning what the Guyana Human Rights Association
(GHRA) described in a press release as yet another instance of the routinization
of excessive force.4 This was in stark contrast to the swiftness with which the trio
were denied due process, and despite Colwyn Harding’s mother bringing the
allegations to the attention of senior members of the Guyana Police Force (GPF)
in December (initially the complaint was only seen as a disciplinary issue and not
one that might require criminal charges). The constable accused of the baton
rape was placed – temporarily only – under arrest, and along with some other
officers was transferred from the Timehri police station where the assaults
allegedly took place. The Guyana Police Force’s Office of Professional
Responsibility (OPR) sent the file with its recommendations to the Police
Complaints Authority (PCA). In mid-May, more than six months after the alleged
assault and four months after the story first surfaced in the press, Chairperson of
the PCA Cecil Kennard recommended to the Director of Public Prosecutions
(DPP) that two police officers be charged and disciplinary actions be taken
against five or six others. On June 3rd, a male and female constable - Devin
Singh and Roselle Tilbury-Douglas – were charged with assaulting Harding “so as
352
Alissa Trotz: Sexual Violence and the State in Guyana: Reflecting on the Colwyn Harding Case
to cause him actual bodily harm.” No charges were recommended in the case
of the alleged assault on Tiffany Edwards (in fact it does not appear to have
even been a matter for consideration by the OPR and PCA).
At the very least, one might have hoped for a swift response from public
officials that acknowledged the severity of the allegations and affirmed a zerotolerance approach to police brutality. Important too would have been a
public commitment to an independent investigation into the specific allegations
along with reassurances offered to potential witnesses that they would be
protected from intimidation. The significance of this latter point was underlined a
few days after the allegations surfaced in the media, when in full view of
attending nurses and while still handcuffed to his hospital bed, Colwyn Harding
was assaulted by male prison officers forcibly attempting to seize a cellphone
left with him by his family.
Instead, in addition to the delayed and partial charges, the public was
treated to a series of utterances that can only be described as defensive,
accusatory and dismissive. Guyanese President Donald Ramotar’s caution
against hanging people without a trial (a reference to the police officers against
whom the allegations had been made) did not prevent senior officials from
commenting on the case in ways that underlined that they had already
reached their own conclusions. Responding to a comment that Colwyn Harding
might be suffering from septicemia as a result of his injuries (in fact this led to a
second surgery having to be performed), Head of the Presidential Secretariat
Roger Luncheon reportedly remarked that since this condition occurred or
continued to persist some two months following the alleged act, ‘God must be
on his side.’5 The Minister of Health shared selective medical information with
Parliament while Harding remained chained to his hospital bed, while the
following day doctors at the Georgetown Public Hospital gave a press
conference; in both cases what appeared to be confidential patient
information was disclosed, begging the question of patient permission about
public disclosure. Despite reiterating the Government’s claimed position that
353
www.sta.uwi.edu/crgs/index.asp
UWI IGDS CRGS Issue 8
ISSN 1995-1108
persons should refrain from pronouncing on the case until investigations were
complete and “a dispassionate analysis can be made,” Minister of Home Affairs
Clement Rohee (under whose portfolio the matter falls) had no problem publicly
musing that from his reading of preliminary reports he believed that “the case is
very complicated as the allegations made are challengeable.”6 The opposition
was accused of seeking to exploit the case for their own partisan ends against
the minority government, a claim heightened by the fact that the lawyer
representing Colwyn Harding, Nigel Hughes, is chairperson of the Alliance for
Change (AFC), one of the opposition parties that comprises the parliamentary
majority. Sections of the media were also singled out by President Ramotar and
other government officials of being irresponsible and of having an agenda. In
fact, were it not for the press reports, this shocking story might never have come
to light in the first place, highlighting the conclusion of the United Nations
Development Programme’s 2012 Caribbean Human Development Report about
the importance of “external informal systems of police accountability” that
include “an alert press and active, credible and organized human rights groups
focused on police misconduct” (UNDP 2012, p.184).
Against this backdrop, there is understandable cynicism in the face of
President Donald Ramotar’s eventual statement, close to two weeks after the
story first appeared in the media, that his government is categorically against
torture; skepticism undoubtedly compounded in early June by the report that a
15-year old had been arrested and shot in his mouth by a cadet officer
allegedly playing Russian roulette during an interrogation over suspected stolen
goods.7 Moreover, the official promises of an independent investigation were
belied by designating the Office of Professional Responsibility (essentially police
investigating themselves) and the Police Complaints Authority as lead agencies
to address the matter. According to its own annual reports, the PCA received
238 written complaints in 2010 and recommended none for prosecution and just
one inquest, and received 241 written complaints in 2011 but recommended not
a single prosecution or inquest.8 It is therefore not surprising that, when reporting
that security institutions across the Caribbean region are in serious crisis, the 2012
354
Alissa Trotz: Sexual Violence and the State in Guyana: Reflecting on the Colwyn Harding Case
UNDP Study quoted a 2010 opinion survey carried out in Guyana in which the
police force ranked 14th in response to a question about levels of trust in 15
institutions.
All this does little to reinforce public confidence that justice will be served
in this case, and only contributes to a sense that, as the GHRA put it, the police
“is more engaged in a cover-up than an investigation of the original brutality to
Colwyn Harding.” The government’s preoccupation with accusing virtually
anyone who spoke out of having a hidden political agenda should also not
distract us from reflecting on what this case says about the moral and ethical
fabric of Guyanese society, and in fact should be the occasion for wondering
whether their response suggests that police brutality comes with the official
imprimatur of state approval. Specifically, the sexual violence that Colwyn
Harding was allegedly subjected to, an assault carried out in the presence of
other law enforcement officers, underlines the authoritative status accorded to
violent, predatory and heteronormative masculinist norms, in which the act of
penetration with a police baton operates as an instrument of emasculation and
violent subordination. Nor is this an isolated case. In 2009 a 15-year old held on
suspected murder charges had a highly flammable liquid poured on his genitals,
which were then set alight by the arresting officers (although he has since been
awarded damages in the High Court, no-one has ever been arrested and
brought before the courts for this gruesome and sexualized act of torture). And
in January 2014, just weeks after the Harding case became news, another
teenager climbed on the roof of a media house threatening suicide, alleging
that he had been raped by three police officers in Georgetown.
These criminal acts, and the apparent sense among perpetrators that
such sexual violence is sanctioned and that they will in fact be protected
(highlighting the uneven distribution of justice that produces and is sustained by
social hierarchy), occur in a context in which the supremacy of
heteronormativity finds support in the law. In a 2012 study on the conditions
facing LGBT persons in Guyana, Christopher Carrico concluded that the
355
www.sta.uwi.edu/crgs/index.asp
UWI IGDS CRGS Issue 8
ISSN 1995-1108
continued criminalization of non-heterosexual relations creates an environment
in which sexual minorities in Guyana must regularly contend with “harassment,
abuse, arrest, prosecution and conviction of crimes,” and where they also
reported being fearful of reporting crimes committed against them (Carrico
2012, p. 4).
It is against this backdrop that we must reckon with the fact that,
notwithstanding Colwyn Harding’s allegations of sodomy with a baton at the
hands of the police, and two independent medical reports that found physical
evidence consistent with his claims, the DPP directed that the police officers be
charged simply with assault.9 At one level, this exemplifies the absence of
effective implementation and enforcement of the recently passed and
potentially far-reaching Sexual Offences Act (SOA), reinforcing a growing sense
that sexual assaults occur in Guyana in an environment of relative impunity.10
The DPP’s failure to invoke the SOA in this case is also instructive in that it reveals
how the crime allegedly visited upon the body of Colwyn Harding did not
appear legible to the state as an act of horrific sexual violence against a young
man in police custody.11 It is reinforced by the official responses (reaching as far
up as the President) to Harding’s allegations: belatedly, and only under public
pressure, addressing the complaint as possibly entailing a criminal act; the
repeated violation of due process; the disclosure of confidential records by
medical professionals entrusted with his care; publicly doubting and even
ridiculing his story. Disappeared from all of this is the original allegation of sexual
violation.
It is important to consider how such illegibility shapes and is shaped by
hegemonic notions of masculinity. Accusing Harding and his lawyer of being
part of an opposition conspiracy to extort huge sums of money from the state
(through claims of damages), an editorial in the taxpayer-funded state
newspaper, the Guyana Chronicle, went on to state:
Now he [the lawyer] is trying to get millions of taxpayers’ money
356
Alissa Trotz: Sexual Violence and the State in Guyana: Reflecting on the Colwyn Harding Case
through allegations of sodomy allegedly committed on a criminal
with a history of armed robbery, who is reputed to live an
alternative lifestyle… One wonders how that doctor is so convinced
that Harding was roughly sodomised by a policeman wielding a
baton and not one of his “clients”. Be that as it may, Government
needs to take steps that the treasury is not raped anymore by
members of the Opposition and their “clients”.12
In this remarkable passage, it is the accuser who becomes the perpetrator, and
the entire Guyanese public who emerge as his victim. There is a deeply
racialized subtext in the move to associate Colwyn Harding with the divisive
arena of party politics, a chain of equivalence between Blackness, criminality
and a political opposition that threatens to return the country to the days of
electoral fraud and African-Guyanese political domination.13
Moreover, Harding’s claims are dismissed not just because he is identified
as someone who according to the editorial has a criminal past (and who
therefore does not deserve due process), but crucially because of suppositions
that he is homosexual and further that he engages in work - sex work - that
entails deviant and disreputable acts. In fact, it is difficult not to see the editorial
as suggesting that non-normative sexualities are equivalent, in this case, to
armed robbery, that is that they are criminal (at the very least the ‘alternative
lifestyle’ reinforces the claim of criminality here). Through this chain of
equivalences, Harding’s claim is rendered not just suspect (even impossible) but
as a fraudulent, opportunistic, criminal allegation itself. His apparent rape is thus
transmogrified into the potential rape of the treasury, displacing state violence
and the specifically sexual forms it takes. The preemptive violence of the state
against a suspect can thus be folded into a narrative in which it is the
respectable citizens of the country who need to be protected from criminal
sexual deviants; in fact within this logic, even the alleged rape of Harding proves
that he is not a real or manly man. This fits into a broader narrative of
homophobia/transphobia, as illustrated by a letter that appeared in another
newspaper, the Guyana Times:
357
www.sta.uwi.edu/crgs/index.asp
UWI IGDS CRGS Issue 8
ISSN 1995-1108
A very interesting fact which this media house left out of the
equation in its analysis is the fact that an organisation protested on
behalf of Harding. It is a well-established fact that this group never
protests on behalf of anyone unless that person is part of the
lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgender (LGBT) community.14
One wonders why the involvement of an LGBT organization should be
considered an interesting, indeed relevant fact. What does Colwyn Harding’s
sexuality have to do with his claims of sexual assault? Bringing to mind the way
that female rape survivors have to contend with discussions of their sexual history
(the survivor shaming and blaming tactics that constitute a further act of
violence), what appear to be at stake here are underlying notions of
(hetero)sexual respectability, policing the boundaries not only of who is a
deserving victim, but who can even make the claim to have suffered a vicious
sexual assault. Put simply, implicit in the letter is the suggestion that Harding’s
supposed (homo)sexuality disqualifies him from any claim of sexual abuse; his is
an unrapeable body.
Unlike Jamaica, where it was estimated that there was an extra-judicial
killing by the police for each day of the first two weeks of 2014, Guyana has no
organizations that address state violence like Jamaicans for Justice, the Peace
Management Initiative or Families Against State Terrorism. It is a country that
some see as hopelessly divided along racialised and party lines, and where the
simplest of matters is easily hijacked to partisan ends, hampering broad-based
organising around a variety of issues. Other efforts to publicly challenge police
brutality in recent years have for the most part been initiated by political parties
(such as the joint opposition’s release of a dossier documenting police brutality),
leading, not surprisingly, to accusations of partisan politicization.15 Discussions of
the racialized character of alleged police assaults (most of the victims of extrajudicial killings have been African-Guyanese males) have also led to the
dismissive response that the Opposition is invested in deepening racial
antagonisms while ignoring political and other forms of violence in which IndianGuyanese are targeted. The dangers of leaving it to political parties to take the
358
Alissa Trotz: Sexual Violence and the State in Guyana: Reflecting on the Colwyn Harding Case
lead on these critical questions are highlighted by the May 2014 appeal by
David Granger, leader of the People’s National Congress (PNC), for all acts of
police torture and shooting over the last seven years to be investigated, as if
there could be no reckoning with the continuities between the current situation
and the highly organized and repressive security apparatus that existed when
the PNC was in power (1968-1992).16
Against this backdrop, the determination from so many quarters to keep
the Harding case in the public eye is a tentative start. It has prompted outrage
and statements from individuals as well as the Guyana Human Rights
Association, the Bar Association, the Private Sector Commission, women’s and
anti-violence organizations (Red Thread, Help and Shelter), sexuality rights
organizations (Society Against all Forms of Sexual Orientation Discrimination,
SASOD) and labour organizations (Guyana Trades Union Congress). It also led to
the formation of the Colwyn Harding Support Group, which has affirmed its
commitment to “advocate, demand and fight for full justice for Colwyn Harding
and other victims of police brutality.” 17
Members of the group have
accompanied Harding as well as the two other young women arrested that
night to court, organized pickets and vigils, and monitored and spoken out
against the preferential treatment that seems to be afforded the two officers
recently charged with assault.
These concerted efforts to speak out cannot be discounted from the
eventual decision to take some kind of legal and disciplinary action – even if
belated and partial – against members of the police force. They underline the
importance of community mobilization and vigilance in establishing public
confidence in and ensuring accountability from the state and its security
apparatus. Moreover, it is through collective and reflective deliberation that we
might hope to address the “exceptional violence” that is constitutive of statesociety relations in the Caribbean (Thomas 2011), in which the contemporary
modalities of state power across the region bear the unmistakable imprint of
359
www.sta.uwi.edu/crgs/index.asp
UWI IGDS CRGS Issue 8
ISSN 1995-1108
colonial policing, and where the rule of law more often serves to secure the
interests of the powerful.
The broad-based response following the January 10th newspaper report,
and particularly the visible role of sexuality, women’s and anti-violence
organizations, offers perhaps the greatest hope that public conversations will
not tiptoe around or gloss over the specifically sexual violence that Colwyn
Harding allegedly suffered at the hands of the police and the epistemic
violence contained in the official responses to the assault. To mark the March
24th International Day for the Right to the Truth Surrounding Gross Human Rights
Violations and for the Dignity of Victims, The Colwyn Harding Support Group,
Red Thread, SASOD and Help and Shelter hosted a public forum on the use of
sexual violence in gross human rights violations, noting that
With more frequent allegations being made against the police
for utilising forms of sexual violence as a means of torture to
interrogate those in their custody, over 570 cases of child sexual
abuse being reported to the Childcare and Protection Agency in
2013, and with a prosecution rate of about one per cent for rape
cases in Guyana, the collaborating human rights groups have taken
note of how sexual violence is destroying society and are
determined to work towards securing justice for victims who suffer in
silence because of Guyana’s flourishing rape culture.18
Making these connections is an urgent necessity; at stake are deeply
historical and embedded ideas of Caribbean personhood, ideas that govern
how we live our lives, and that sanction, through the routinization and
normalization of violence, the policing of the boundaries of acceptability/
respectability, placing profound limits on what it means to be human today.
360
Alissa Trotz: Sexual Violence and the State in Guyana: Reflecting on the Colwyn Harding Case
1
This is a revised version of a newspaper column I wrote, “Public Confidence, Public Accountability and the
Police,” Stabroek Daily News, February 3rd, 2014
2
‘Man alleges police brutality, sodomy,’ Kaieteur News, January 10, 2014
3
Teneisha Evans was released on bail but was later apprehended for allegedly stealing from a relative in
an attempt to find the funds to bail Harding. After the story became public, monies were raised to
bail Tiffany Edwards. Thanks to the Society Against Sexual Orientation Discrimination (SASOD) for
helping to piece together the narrative and supplying an exhaustive inventory of press coverage
of the case.
4
‘News reports increase urgency of needed reforms in Guyana police force,’ Guyana Human Rights
Association Press Release, January 18, 2014
5
‘Government rules out voluntary compensation to baton-sodomized man,’ Demerara Waves, January
16th, 2014
6
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPgCowJDIF0 (accessed August 21, 2014)
7
‘Open and shut case,’ Stabroek Daily News, May 8th, 2014
8
‘Absent Home Affairs official delays 2012 Police Complaints Authority report’ Kaieteur News, March 3rd,
2014
9
“There is deep concern about the Colwyn Harding case,” Letter to the Editor, Stabroek Daily News, June
19, 2014
10
‘Sexual Offences Act still to be fully implemented,’ Stabroek Daily News, April 27, 2014
11
The charge of assault would appear to be consistent with the recommendation of retired justice
Kennard, head of the Police Complaints Authority, who according to the media suggested that
“there was nothing in the file to indicate that Harding had been baton-raped.” GPH doctors, in
their unauthorized discussion of the medical records, claimed that they had not looked for
evidence of sexual assault as they had not been directed – presumably by the prison guards or the
victim – to do so. In one news report, Colwyn Harding spoke of prison officials laughing when he first
attempted to tell them that he had been sodomized, and of being embarrassed to disclose the
assault to the doctors. See ‘Colwyn Harding alleged baton assault…Witness claims he was offered
$$$ to change his story,’ Kaieteur News, February 19, 2014; ‘Colwyn Harding says he was
embarrassed to tell doctors he was sodomized,’ iNews, January 17, 2014; ‘Doctors never offered
me a diagnosis, Harding says,’ Stabroek Daily News, January 19, 2014.
It is not clear whether the independent medical reports done in Guyana and Jamaica were included or
asked for, even though there appear to be several instances in which the police were asked to
supply further information. ‘See ‘Criminal charges to be recommended against two cops in Colwyn
Harding case – Kennard,’ Stabroek Daily News, May 22, 2014
12
‘Denied access to the exchequer, Opposition still tries to rob treasury of millions,’ Editorial page, Guyana
Chronicle, February 15, 2014
13
For a discussion of the Guyana Chronicle’s persistent stereotyping of African-Guyanese as deviant,
violent, criminal and racist in relation to Indian-Guyanese, see ‘We should not be silent: Speaking
out against the July 2 Guyana Chronicle Editorial,’ Stabroek News, In the Diaspora column, July 10,
2012
14
‘Much more about the Colwyn Harding matter,’ Letter to the Editor, Guyana Times, March 12, 2014
361
www.sta.uwi.edu/crgs/index.asp
UWI IGDS CRGS Issue 8
ISSN 1995-1108
15
For the dossier, see http://www.guyanapnc.org/MediaCentre/PressRelease/DOSSIER%20TORTURE%20IN
%20GUYANA.pdf, accessed August 20, 2014. WARNING: it contains a graphic image of police
torture in the prefatory note on page ii).
16
A motion was brought before parliament that was passed, without support from the government. See
‘House approves motion for police torture inquiry,’ Stabroek Daily News, May 22nd, 2014.
17
18
‘There is deep concern about the Colwyn Harding case’
‘Forum on sexual violence slated for Sunday,’ Guyana Times, March 29, 2014; ‘The police have been
accused of using sexual violence against citizens,’ Letter to the Editor, Stabroek Daily News, March
25, 2014
362
Alissa Trotz: Sexual Violence and the State in Guyana: Reflecting on the Colwyn Harding Case
References
Carrico, Christopher. 2012. Collateral damage: the social impact of laws affecting LGBT persons
in Guyana. Faculty of Law UWI Rights Advocacy Project, Barbados: COT Holdings Ltd.
Thomas, Deborah A. 2011. Exceptional violence: embodied citizenship in transnational Jamaica.
Durham and London: Duke University Press.
UNDP. 2011. Caribbean Human Development Report: Human development and the shift to
better citizen security. New York: UNDP
363
www.sta.uwi.edu/crgs/index.asp
UWI IGDS CRGS Issue 8
ISSN 1995-1108
http://sta.uwi.edu/crgs/index.asp
364