Hindawi Publishing Corporation Clinical and Developmental Immunology Volume 2011, Article ID 678570, 11 pages doi:10.1155/2011/678570 Review Article Modulation of Cell Death by M. tuberculosis as a Strategy for Pathogen Survival Markos Abebe,1, 2, 3 Louise Kim,2 Graham Rook,2 Abraham Aseffa,1 Liya Wassie,1, 3 Martha Zewdie,1 Alimuddin Zumla,2 Howard Engers,1 Peter Andersen,3 and T. Mark Doherty3 1 Armauer Hansen Research Institute, P.O. Box 1005, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Centre for Infectious Diseases and International Health, Windeyer Institute of Medical Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London WC1T 4JF, UK 3 Department of Infectious Disease Immunology, Statens Serum Institute, Artillerivej 5, København S, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark 2 The Correspondence should be addressed to T. Mark Doherty, tmd@ssi.dk Received 17 September 2010; Accepted 27 November 2010 Academic Editor: Nicholas West Copyright © 2011 Markos Abebe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. It has been clearly demonstrated that in vitro, virulent M. tuberculosis can favor necrosis over apoptosis in infected macrophages, and this has been suggested as a mechanism for evading the host immune response. We recently reported that an effect consistent with this hypothesis could be observed in cells from the blood of TB patients, and in this paper, we review what is known about evasion strategies employed by M. tuberculosis and in particular consider the possible interaction of the apoptosis-inhibiting effects of M. tuberculosis infection with another factor (IL-4) whose expression is thought to play a role in the failure to control M. tuberculosis infection. It has been noted that IL-4 may exacerbate TNF-α-induced pathology, though the mechanism remains unexplained. Since pathology in TB typically involves inflammatory aggregates around infected cells, where TNF-α plays an important role, we predicted that IL-4 would inhibit the ability of cells to remove M. tuberculosis by apoptosis of infected cells, through the extrinsic pathway, which is activated by TNF-α. Infection of human monocytic cells with mycobacteria in vitro, in the presence of IL-4, appears to promote necrosis over apoptosis in infected cells—a finding consistent with its suggested role as a factor in pathology during M. tuberculosis infection. 1. Introduction It is generally accepted that tuberculosis (TB) is responsible for 2-3 million deaths and more than 8 million new cases annually [1]. The majority of these occur in developing countries, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa [2], where a substantial proportion of the population (perhaps as much as a third) is thought to be latently infected. Though they are able to control the initial infection, they may later reactivate their disease if they become immunocompromised [3]. Infection with M. tuberculosis is associated with an active inflammatory immune response, characterized by elevated expression of both TNF-α [4–7] and IFN-γ [8–10]. These two cytokines are essential for controlling mycobacterial infections [11–14] but it is clear that in many cases, M. tuberculosis is able to survive this inflammatory process. Indeed, M. tuberculosis depends on the induction of an inflammatory response and the subsequent tissue damage for cavitation and dissemination via pulmonary disease to new hosts. It is probably for this reason that it expresses multiple molecules on its surface to promote inflammatory responses by the host. It is therefore no surprise that M. tuberculosis has evolved a number of mechanisms by which it interacts with, and modulates, the host’s immune response. In addition to inflammation-promoting molecules [15], M. tuberculosis also expresses surface antigens that can induce IL-10 and IL4, [16–18] that typically have an anti-inflammatory effect. Elevated expression of IL-4 (a cytokine with pleiotropic activity) has been implicated as a potential virulence factor, both for its anti-inflammatory capacity and apparent ability to promote tissue damage in association with TNF-α [19]. 2 Higher levels of IL-4 expression also correlate with heightened immune responsiveness to ESAT-6, a proxy marker for infection in TB contacts [20–22] and for bacterial load. Finally, the ratio of IL-4 to IFN-γ or the IL-4 antagonistic splice variant, IL-4δ2, appears to be correlated with clinical status and in particular, with TB-related pathology [23–26] rather than of infection. These studies suggest that IL-4 (alone or together with TNF-α) may play a role in tissue destruction and/or cell death during M. tuberculosis infection. Since cell death (by apoptosis) is a mechanism by which the host can remove infected cells [27, 28] while minimizing cell death and tissue destruction in adjacent, uninfected cells [29], this has obvious relevance for the control of M. tuberculosis infection. Indeed, there is a substantial body of literature suggesting that M. tuberculosis can directly interfere with the apoptosis of infected cells in vitro [30, 31] and that this appears to be directly related to virulence [32, 33]. In contrast, nonvirulent mycobacteria have a much weaker effect and, being dependant on dose, may even promote apoptosis [30]. This question has come under increasing scrutiny in the last few years, and the mechanisms by which M. tuberculosis can inhibit apoptosis are being rapidly identified [34]. However, the relative importance of apoptosis as a virulence mechanism in vivo and interaction of apoptotic mechanisms with the host cytokine response have until recently been largely unexplored and it is only recently that this area has come into focus [35]. 2. M. tuberculosis and the Generation of Pathology M. tuberculosis normally enters the host though the mucosal surfaces—via the lung after inhalation of exhaled droplets containing bacteria or less frequently through the gut after ingestion of bacteria (e.g., in milk from an infected animal). Although some M. tuberculosis-exposed individuals show no signs of infection or T cell memory—having possibly eliminated the pathogen via the innate immune response— the majority of exposed persons display the induction of a rapid inflammatory response. Cytokine and chemokine release triggers the swift accumulation of a variety of immune cells and, with time, the formation of a granuloma, characterized by a relatively small number of infected phagocytes, surrounded by activated monocyte/macrophages and lymphocytes [36]. Traditionally, the granuloma has been thought of as a containment mechanism of the host, but recent work suggests that granulomas are dynamic entities, growing and shrinking as cells are recruited and die [37]. The granuloma may eventually disappear, leaving a small scar or calcification, and the patient’s T cells become responsive to M. tuberculosis-derived antigens. However, if bacterial replication is not successfully controlled, the granuloma can increase in size and cellularity. The end point of this process is necrosis, and the tissue destruction caused by necrosis, can breach the mucosal surface allowing the granuloma contents to leak into the lumen of the lung or allowing M. tuberculosis to escape into the blood vessels of the lung, leading to further dissemination. Destruction of the lumen of the lung—a Clinical and Developmental Immunology process referred to as cavitation—gives rise to the prototypic symptom of TB, a persistent cough with blood in the sputum. At this point the patient is infectious, spreading the bacteria by aerosol. 3. Inhibition of Early Host Responses M. tuberculosis’s ability to persist within the host is directly linked to the fate of the immune cells which phagocytose it. The macrophage/monocyte thus occupies a pivotal place, as the prototypic host cell for M. tuberculosis, and also as the cell responsible for both killing the bacteria directly and priming immune responses by antigen presentation. M. tuberculosis interferes with immune activation at virtually every stage. The processes involved in the pathogen’s interference with vesicle trafficking and intracellular killing have been well described [38]. The processes involved in large-scale tissue destruction and cell death, however, remain to be mapped out. Tissue destruction is not mediated directly by M. tuberculosi; the bacterium has little or no lytic activity; it is primarily an immunopathological process. Unlike pathogens such as Leishmania spp, which can establish chronic infection by evading the host immune response, M. tuberculosis actively provokes it. The pathogen expresses a number of molecules that bind to the host’s pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) receptors, such as the Toll-like Receptor (TLR) family [39]. Interestingly, despite M. tuberculosis’s long coevolutionary history with humanity, these molecules are largely conserved, even though most of them do not appear to be essential for the pathogen’s growth or invasive ability [40, 41]. The simplest explanation is that M. tuberculosis depends on the immunopathology that promotes necrosis both for dissemination within the host and for spread to new hosts, but also subverts this response, to allow it to persist in the host. Moreover, the ability of M. tuberculosis to rapidly alter its pattern of gene expression in response to stress [42] suggests that the pathogen may do both: in response to the local microenvironment, it may manipulate immune responses so as to favor apoptosis (reducing inflammation, thus allowing persistent infection) or necrosis (promoting tissue destruction, cavitation, and spread to new hosts). Inhibition of inflammation at early stages may give M. tuberculosis a breathing space to initiate a productive infection. It has been suggested that invasion of phagocytes which are not yet activated is important for the bacteria’s survival since exposure of macrophages to IFN-γ and/or TNFα before—but not after—infection decreases the ability of pathogenic mycobacteria to inhibit phagosome maturation and function [43] at least partially by upregulating the production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen derivatives [44–48]. Mannose derivatives on the pathogen’s surface molecules from pathogenic (but not nonpathogenic) mycobacteria inhibit phagocytosis by activated macrophages [49] perhaps targeting the pathogen to cells less prepared to contain it and inhibiting the initiation of inflammatory responses. It does this in part, by targeting the very mechanisms involved in activating cell-mediated immunity. Though TLR2/4 ligation can initiate the inflammatory cascade in Clinical and Developmental Immunology response to mycobacterial infection [50–53], it appears that interference in IFN-γ-signaling via TLR signaling is also a potential virulence mechanism [54]. The 19 kDa lipoprotein of M. tuberculosis appears to be a virulence factor [55] that reduces overall immunity to the bacterium in mice [56]. It is known to bind to TLR1/2 on host cells [57, 58] with resulting inhibition of inflammatory cytokine production (reducing expression of over a third of the IFN-γ-activated genes [59]), and reduced antigen-processing and MHC II expression [59–61]. The virulence factor ESAT-6 has a similar effect, also operating through TLR-2 [62], apparently by modulating TCR signaling pathways downstream of the proximal TCR signaling molecule, ZAP70 [63]. And other factors such as phosphoglycolipids bind to other PAMPs to induce IL-4 and IL-13, apparently contributing to virulence [16, 17, 64], and modulating cytokine expression in concert with other factors [65]. Indeed, M. tuberculosis appears to actively modulate cytokine expression at multiple levels. The mannose derivative lipoarabinomannan (LAM), which is expressed by pathogenic (but not nonpathogenic) mycobacteria, can bind to the DC-SIGN molecule, expressed on the surface of dendritic cells. The binding of LAM to DC-SIGN inhibits maturation and induces dendritic cells to secrete IL-10 [18, 66]. This inhibits antigen presentation, expression of MHC molecules, and expression of costimulatory receptors. Consistent with this, recent studies have found that expression of IL-10 is significantly elevated in TB patients with active disease [67–69]. LAM binding to DC-SIGN also inhibits the production of IL-12 by affected antigen-presenting cells. IL12 is crucial to immunity to M. tuberculosis, as indicated by the effect of gene polymorphisms on susceptibility to TB, and the extreme susceptibility to mycobacterial disease of individuals with lesions in genes of the IL-12 and IL12R pathways [70, 71]. Control of IL-12 expression is key to the expansion and activation of IFN-γ—secreting CD4 T cells which are crucial for immunity to TB, as shown by the susceptibility of animals or patients defective in CD4 T cell function or IFN-γ expression or recognition [72–76]. 4. Activating and Modulating the Adaptive Immune to M. Tuberculosis Both CD4 and (to a lesser extent) CD8 T cells are thought to be crucial to containing M. tuberculosis infection via IFN-γ production and possibly cytotoxicity [77–79]. As discussed above, M. tuberculosis appears to subvert the host’s immune response, in part by directly countering the activation of T cell—particularly Th1-responses. Consistent with this, IFN-γ recall responses are generally reduced in patients with advanced TB [80], while IL-4 is elevated [81–83]. The level of IL-4 gene expression appears to correlate with both disease severity in TB patients [81, 82] and risk of subsequent disease in TB-exposed individuals [23, 25]. The IFN-γ/IL-4 ratio increases in most patients during therapy, but decreases in contacts that become ill, suggesting that this state is directly related to the disease [25]. This is supported by reports that increased production of the IL-4 antagonist IL-4δ2 is seen in individuals who are 3 controlling TB in its latent stage [20] and that the IL-4δ2/IL4 ratio increases during treatment of TB patients [25] and in those TB patients who respond most rapidly to therapy [84]. Similar observations have also been made in animal models of TB [85, 86]. A poor prognosis in TB is associated with a low IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio just as is seen for IFN-γ/IL-4 [8, 25, 87]. Altering the balance between IFN-γ and IL-4 or IL-10 production and function thus seems to be a second major survival strategy for M. tuberculosis, and the studies above suggest that when this balance is shifted towards IL-4, the result is increased pathology. Although IL-4 can inhibit the effect of IFN-γ by decreasing the production of IFN-γ response factor-1 (IRF-1), a transcriptional element that enhances expression of IFN-γinducible genes such as iNOS [88], high levels of IL-4 are not associated with an absence of inflammatory factors. The proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α is a crucial component for protection against M. tuberculosis, as shown by the rapid reactivation of latent M. tuberculosis infection in people treated with TNF-α receptor antagonists [89, 90] and the susceptibility of TNF-α-deficient animals to M. tuberculosis [5, 7]. Nonetheless, TNF-α mRNA is elevated in TB patients [4] and in TB/HIV-infected patients elevated levels of TNFα were associated with necrosis [91]. It has been suggested that while it is essential for protection, that in the presence of elevated levels of IL-4, TNF-α appears to promote tissue damage rather than protection [19, 92], possibly by a cooperative effect of transcription [93, 94]. These studies indicate that M. tuberculosis seems to have multiple mechanisms devoted to inhibiting both IFN-γ and TNFα function and that the pathogen can evade killing by the immune system while still generating the pathology it needs for dissemination—and suggest that IL-4 may play a crucial role. 5. Cytokines, Cell Death, and Pathology One clue to the mechanisms possibly involved is reports showing that resolving granulomas are rich in apoptotic cells and that inhibition of apoptotic capacity leads to reduced ability to control M. tuberculosis [95]. Granulomas are metabolically active sites, with cells being continually recruited and eliminated [37]. This can occur by several processes—but apoptosis or necrosis feature prominently. It has been suggested that apoptosis is a “silent” method whereby the host can remove infected cells [27, 28] while minimizing cell death in adjacent, uninfected cells, thus decreasing tissue destruction [29]. Antigens from engulfed apoptotic cells are presented, thus enabling cross-priming of the immune response [96]. Modeling studies suggest that TNF-α is one of the strongest factors controlling monocyte recruitment to the granuloma and that TNF-α-driven apoptosis is the strongest negative factor [97]. This is not surprising: TNF-α is a potent inducer of cell death by apoptosis [98]. Necrosis, on the other hand, is associated with the lysis of the infected cell, release of viable M. tuberculosis, and damage to the surrounding tissue [29] and TNF-α is also a major player here [91]. The centre of large unresolved granulomas often becomes necrotic and 4 as mentioned above, this tissue destruction is an essential feature in the spread of M. tuberculosis. There is now a substantial body of evidence from both in vitro and in vivo studies indicating that virulent M. tuberculosis (but not avirulent mycobacteria) can inhibit apoptosis, and that this may represent an escape mechanism whereby the pathogen can avoid the death of its host cell by apoptosis (and the internalized bacteria along with it as the apoptotic cell is digested) [32, 99–105]. Recent work suggests that M. tuberculosis can actively promote necrosis over apoptosis, consistent with the idea that this is a survival/virulence mechanism for the bacteria [106–109]. Supporting this hypothesis, studies indicate that elevated levels of necrosis are associated with genetic susceptibility to M. tuberculosis in mice [110] or virulence of humanderived clinical isolates [111] and that control of apoptosis via CD43/TNF-α inflammatory responses is important for control of M. tuberculosis [112]. Some of the genes involved such as nuoG have already been identified [113]. 6. Interplay between TNF-α, IL-4, and Cell Death In Vivo We therefore have started to examine the significance of TNF-α-mediated apoptosis in human TB. Recently published data [4] indicates that there is a strong upregulation of genes for factors that promote apoptosis in PBMC from individuals with active disease, including TNF-α and its receptors, Fas and FasL and pro-Caspase 8, when compared to exposed individuals without active disease. This is consistent with an important role for apoptosis in human TB. The fact that expression of these molecules are elevated in those with overt disease and also that the degree of expression of TNF-α correlated with severity of pathology in humans (author’s unpublished data and [91, 114]) suggests that TNFα is directly involved in the generation of immunopathology. However, it is hard to reconcile inhibition of apoptosis as a mechanism for pathology if expression of apoptotic genes is highest in those with the worst pathology. A possible explanation for this is the observation that while expression of proapoptotic markers was elevated in PBMC from TB patients, when the CD14+ monocytic fraction was examined, the reverse was true [4]. Our conclusion was that monocytes from TB patients—but not monocytes from those infected with M. tuberculosis but asymptomatic, such as individuals with latent TB—were likely less responsive to extrinsic stimuli promoting apoptosis such as TNF-α. Further, we hypothesized that since it was highly unlikely that the majority of CD14+ cells in the blood were infected with M. tuberculosis, this effect was likely modulated by soluble factors. IL-4 is an obvious candidate, given that it is also the most elevated in these patients, it declines as symptoms abate during treatment [25], and its modulation of necrosis induced by TNF-α has been suggested in the past [115, 116]. Increased IL-4 and TNF-α expressions are also apparently associated with severity of pathology in mouse model [117], but interestingly, the only study to look at these factors in granulomas from human disease found no association between IL-4 Clinical and Developmental Immunology and necrosis—though as the authors note, they could not distinguish between IL-4 and the IL-4 antagonistic splice variant IL4δ2 [91] which renders this difficult to interpret. 7. Interplay between TNF-α, IL-4, and Cell Death In Vitro In the current absence of more data from human studies, we have examined this hypothesized interaction in vitro, infecting the human monocytic cell line THP-1 to observe what, if any, effect IL-4 had on the expression of genes that have been shown to be differentially regulated by mycobacterial infection [118–122] particularly those involved in activation of the extrinsic (inflammation-induced) pathway of apoptosis (TNF-α, TNFR1, TNFR2, Fas, FasL, and Caspase 8). Although not a perfect substitute, THP-1 cells have been frequently used as proxies for alveolar macrophages and have been used in many prior studies of mycobacteriainduced apoptosis [123]. We therefore infected these cells with the virulent M. tuberculosis Erdman strain (a clinical isolate) as a prototypical virulent mycobacteria, while the TB vaccine strain BCG Danish 1337 was used as the prototypical avirulent strain. Pilot experiments with the H37Rv and H37Ra virulent and avirulent strains were also done, with similar results to those reported here (data not shown). Bacterial infections were titrated down from a high dose (MOI of 50) down to a low dose (MOI of 5) based on previous publications [124]. We chose the higher dose, based on previous work, which suggested that a higher MOI was needed to induce rapid and detectable apoptosis in vitro [30, 123, 125]. To ensure that the infection protocol used induced significant levels of apoptosis, we infected THP-1 cells in the presence or absence of IL-4 at 10 ng/ml and monitored apoptosis and necrosis with a cell death ELISA kit, optimized to detect both apoptosis and necrosis. As can be seen in Table 1, after 24 hours, infection with BCG led to a major increase in the amount of apoptosis. Interestingly, the level of apoptosis was slightly reduced by IL-4 treatment alone, though this did not significantly decrease the increase of apoptosis induced by BCG. However, supernatants from the same cultures were assayed for total cell death to assess necrosis and this revealed that IL-4 had a significant effect on the balance of cell death. While IL-4 alone did not significantly affect the level of necrosis, in combination with BCG infection, it had a clear pronecrotic effect. Thus, IL4 appears to bias cell death slightly towards necrosis over apoptosis, and this effect was enhanced by BCG infection (Table 1). The results with M. tuberculosis Erdman were strikingly different from BCG. At 24 hours, M. tuberculosis infection slightly reduced apoptosis and this effect was marginally (but not significantly) augmented by IL-4 (Table 1). But either M. tuberculosis infection or IL-4 treatment led to an increased ratio of cell death by necrosis compared to apoptosis. This effect required living bacteria, as heat killed bacteria had no significant effect on apoptosis or necrosis after 24, 48, or 72 hours of culture (data not shown). We also looked Clinical and Developmental Immunology 5 Table 1: Alteration in cell death by apoptosis or necrosis in THP-1 cells infected with BCG or M. tuberculosis Erdmann (MOI 50) assessed at 24 hours by the Cell Death Detection ELISAPLUS photometric enzyme immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Lewes, UK) which measures cell death by both apoptosis and necrosis on fractionated samples. Associated changes in mRNA for the major host genes involved in the activation of the extrinsic pathway of apoptosis were assessed by quantitative Real-Time PCR, using HuPO as a housekeeping gene for normalization. Results shown are relative to untreated cells, of the means of assays from a single experiment (representative of 4) performed in triplicate (ELISA) or quadruplicate (RT-PCR). Values marked in bold text represent a significant increase, those in italics a significant decrease. The ANOVA test (with Dunnett’s multiple comparison posttest for all groups against untreated controls) was used for analyses between groups. In all instances, a P value < .05 was considered significant. A value of “<.1” indicates below the limit of detection, with “ND” indicates that the experiment was not done. Fold change over uninfected THP-1 cells Infected with: null BCG BCG Erdmann Erdmann + IL-4 − IL-4 + IL-4 − IL-4 + IL-4 Apoptosis Necrosis TNF-α TNFR1 TNFR2 Fas FasL 0.67 ± 0.13 3.38 ± 0.04 3.29 ± 0.08 0.44 ± 0.22 0.37 ± 0.12 0.79 ± 0.19 1.06 ± 0.18 2.68 ± 0.14 1.13 ± 0.30 1.34 ± 0.07 0.51 2.15 0.05 17.43 4.21 0.68 15.59 2.27 4.96 1.38 0.57 18.99 3.00 5.20 1.89 0.66 0.13 <0.1 0.65 0.34 0.96 ND ND 1.30 1.15 at the effect of BCG and M. tuberculosis infection (with or without IL-4) after 72 hours of culture and obtained very similar results (data not shown). Finally, we confirmed the ELISA data by FACS analysis for annexin V, which was expressed by 16.28% after 24 hours of culture with BCG, while only 7.26% of control cells were positive. In the presence of IL-4, only 7.06% of BCG-exposed cells were annexin-V positive, confirming the ELISA data. These data are thus consistent with earlier studies suggesting that virulent (but not avirulent) mycobacteria are capable of inhibiting apoptosis, possibly as a defence mechanism against clearance by the host [32, 33]. In addition, the data suggest that IL-4 can also have a mild antiapoptotic effect—though it appears in this in vitro model that this inhibition of apoptosis by IL-4 does not prevent cell death, so much as renders host cells more susceptible to death by necrosis—potentially releasing bacteria which could reinfect adjacent cells, thus further promoting inflammation and immunopathology. 8. Effect of IL-4 and Mycobacterial Infection on Expression of Apoptosis-Modulating Genes To examine the mechanism behind the IL-4 effect, we examined expression of multiple genes involved in activating pathways of induced cell death. It was clear from the apoptosis data (Table 1) that the processes driving apoptosis had already started by 24 hours. We thus performed the PCR analyses after 24 hours of culture, using quantitative PCR to compare the mRNA expression in infected and uninfected cells with or without IL-4 added to the cultures. As shown in Table 1, mycobacterial infection induced a strong TNFα response at 24 hours, and strongly activated expression of the genes for the two TNF-α receptors. All of these activating effects were antagonized by IL-4. We also analyzed the supernatants from these cultures and found that in parallel with the induction of TNFR2 mRNA by BCG and Caspase 8 0.67 4.35 0.61 0.36 0.35 M. tuberculosis, there was a significant increase (P < .01) in the amount of soluble TNFR2 protein detectable in culture supernatants 24 hours after infection (data not shown). This increase was identical for BCG and M. tuberculosis and was not inhibited in the presence of IL-4, suggesting that in the presence of IL-4, infected cells continue to shed the TNFR2 receptor at increased levels (compared to uninfected cells), at the same time in which mRNA production is downregulated by IL-4, potentially leading to reduced surface expression and further decreasing the responsiveness of these cells to TNFα. This is consistent with the picture we drew from patient PBMC [4]. Gene expression for the proapoptotic molecule Fas was not affected by BCG infection, although it was significantly decreased by IL-4. In M. tuberculosis-infected cells, however, Fas expression declined significantly, (Table 1). Since this is likely to render M. tuberculosis-infected cells more resistant to Fas-mediated death, we also assessed expression of FasL in these cells, to gain an idea of what effect they might have on sensitized cells that came into contact with them. However, despite some variability, no significant differences in FasL expression were seen that could be attributed to IL-4 or M. tuberculosis infection (Table 1). Downstream of both Fas and the TNF-α receptor complexes lies one of the major activating molecules of the extrinsic death pathway, Caspase 8. In BCG-infected THP1 cells, pro-Caspase 8 transcription increased dramatically and this increase was inhibited by IL-4 consistent with the effects seen on apoptosis. In contrast, in M. tuberculosisinfected cells, the opposite was seen, with falling proCaspase 8 expression. IL-4 also reduced pro-Caspase 8 expression by itself, but this effect was not significantly different from that induced by M. tuberculosis infection. To determine if the decrease in Caspase 8 induced by M. tuberculosis infection could be countered by falling levels of apoptosis-antagonising molecules, we also assessed the levels of gene expression for the antiapoptotic molecule FLIPs. Here, however, we found significantly increased expression 6 induced by M. tuberculosis infection (P < .01), suggesting that if anything, the antiapoptotic effect of decreased Caspase 8 would be amplified. Neither IL-4 nor BCG had a significant effect on FLIPs (data not shown). In total, these data are consistent with prior findings that M. tuberculosis has an apoptosis-blocking effect and indicate that this affects not just the intrinsic pathway but also extrinsic activation of apoptosis mediated through the pro-Caspase 8 molecule, which avirulent mycobacteria do not share. In addition, they suggest that this is potentiated by IL-4, which promotes necrosis instead, supporting a role in the virulence of M. tuberculosis. The data also indicate that this antiapoptotic effect occurs at the gene transcription level and affects multiple gene pathways—though the simple experiments presented here are indicative, not definitive. 9. A Model for M. Tuberculosis Pathogenesis There is a significant body of evidence from both in vitro and in vivo studies indicating that virulent M. tuberculosis can inhibit apoptosis and that this may represent an escape mechanism whereby the pathogen can avoid the death of its host cell—and the internalized bacteria along with it [32, 99–105]. Knock-in studies using the nuoG gene of M. tuberculosis showed that this gene conferred the ability to inhibit apoptosis and increased virulence in mice to avirulent mycobacteria, while its deletion rendered M. tuberculosis less able to inhibit apoptosis of infected THP-1 cells [113]. A number of genes involved in membrane repair and lipid biosynthesis have also been identified [34]. All of these studies indicate that M. tuberculosis actively interferes with the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis in the infected host cell as a means of virulence and that disregulation of the host’s lipid metabolism is a major pathway for generating pathology [126] and promoting necrosis over apoptosis [34]. The picture for inhibition via the extrinsic apoptotic pathway is also rapidly becoming filled in. Knockout studies of the OppA and OppD genes have implicated the peptide transporters encoded by Rv3665c-Rv3662c and Rv1280cRv1283c as inhibitors of apoptosis and this is associated with decreased production of cytokines, including TNFα [127]. Likewise, the hypothetical proteins Rv3654c and Rv3655c appear to interfere with the extrinsic pathway by diminishing the availability of active Caspase 8 through posttranscriptional modification [128]. Inhibition of signaling via members of the TNF receptor superfamily (TNF-α and Fas) has long been suggested as a major factor [32, 129, 130] for modulating pathology and more of the genes apparently involved in this process are being identified [131–133]. Interestingly, these findings are tying identified genotypes (such as nuoG mutants) to the same mechanisms—production of TNF-α and reactive oxygen species—already associated with defence and immunopathology in TB [113, 131, 132]. M. tuberculosis infection is known to induce TNFαproduction, but in vivo, infection of host cells does not occur in a vacuum, but in the presence of a variety of immunomodulating factors. We hypothesize that one such factor, IL-4, a cytokine whose expression appears to correlate with a poorer prognosis after M. tuberculosis infection Clinical and Developmental Immunology [21, 23–25, 92, 134] when combined with TNF-α, may worsen TB-related pathology, possibly by biasing cell death towards necrosis instead. If this effect is replicated in vivo, (and our data in clinical studies suggest it is [4]) it might help explain why a bias toward IL-4 expression can lead to aggravated pathology in TB [20, 26, 134, 135]. In addition, IL-4 strongly inhibits the expression of the pro-apoptotic molecule TNF-α and its two receptors, which are otherwise increased by mycobacterial infection—an effect which may be exacerbated since mycobacterial infection appears to promote the shedding of the soluble form of the receptors [4] that can act as competitive inhibitors. Inhibiting TNF-α in primate studies appears to promote pathology [136]. All of this supports the hypothesis that control of apoptosis via CD43/TNF-a inflammatory responses is important for control of M. tuberculosis [106, 108, 112]. Finally, IL-4 appears to play a role in the differentiation of M2 (or antiinflammatory) macrophages, [137–139], which not only promote IL-4 and IL-10 production, but also handle arginine and iron—two important resources for M. tuberculosis— differently from M1 macrophages [140, 141]. We suggest expanding the mechanisms by which M. tuberculosis actively interferes in this process to suggest that the induction of IL-4, which has been linked to virulence, does so via multiple pathways, and at least partially by promoting cell death by necrosis instead of apoptosis. Identifying the mycobacterial factors which drive this process could offer potential new targets for vaccine and drug development and we are thus investigating M. tuberculosis factors that may be involved. Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge Mrs Kidist Bobosha for technical assistance. They appreciate AHRI’s administration for the support they provided. Part of the work described here was funded by EU INCO contracts ICA-CT1999-10005, IC4-2001-10050, EU FP6 contract no. 503367, and the institutes’ core budgets. AHRI is supported by the Governments of Ethiopia, Norway, and Sweden. M. Abebe and L. Kim contributed equally to the work described in this paper. The VACSEL study group also includes University College London, Helen Fletcher (until 2003), University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia: Professor Chifumbe Chintu MD, Gina Mulundu MSc, Dr. Peter Mwaba MD.PhD. MRC, Gambia: Professor KPWJ McAdam (until 2003), Patrick Owiafe, Dr. David Warndorff (2001), Dr. Christian Lienhardt (until 2001), Dr. R Brookes, and Dr. Phillip Hill (2001–2006). References [1] M. W. Borgdorff, K. Floyd, and J. F. Broekmans, “Interventions to reduce tuberculosis mortality and transmission in low- and middle-income countries,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 217–227, 2002. [2] C. Dye, S. Scheele, P. Dolin, V. Pathania, and M. C. Raviglione, “Consensus statement. Global burden of tuberculosis: estimated incidence, prevalence, and mortality by Clinical and Developmental Immunology [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] country. WHO Global Surveillance and Monitoring Project,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 282, pp. 677–686, 1999. J. Úriz Ayestarán, J. Repáraz, J. Castiello, and J. Sola, “Tuberculosis in patients with HIV infectionTuberculosis en pacientes infectados por el VIH,” Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 131–142, 2007. M. Abebe, T. M. Doherty, L. Wassie et al., “Expression of apoptosis-related genes in an Ethiopian cohort study correlates with tuberculosis clinical status,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 291–301, 2010. J. L. Flynn, M. M. Goldstein, J. Chan et al., “Tumor necrosis factor-α is required in the protective immune response against mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice,” Immunity, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 561–572, 1995. V. P. Mohan, C. A. Scanga, K. Yu et al., “Effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha on host immune response in chronic persistent tuberculosis: possible role for limiting pathology,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1847–1855, 2001. T. Ogawa, H. Uchida, Y. Kusumoto, Y. Mori, Y. Yamamura, and S. Hamada, “Increase in tumor necrosis factor alpha- and interleukin-6-secreting cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from subjects infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 3021– 3025, 1991. R. Hussain, N. Talat, F. Shahid, and G. Dawood, “Longitudinal tracking of cytokines after acute exposure to tuberculosis: association of distinct cytokine patterns with protection and disease development,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1578–1586, 2007. I. Kawamura, “Protective immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Kekkaku, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 687–691, 2006. J. Ma, T. Chen, J. Mandelin et al., “Regulation of macrophage activation,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2334–2346, 2003. H. A. Fletcher, “Correlates of immune protection from tuberculosis,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 319–325, 2007. C. Goter-Robinson, S. C. Derrick, A. L. Yang, B. Y. Jeon, and S. L. Morris, “Protection against an aerogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in BCG-immunized and DNAvaccinated mice is associated with early type I cytokine responses,” Vaccine, vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 3522–3529, 2006. S. Hervas-Stubbs, L. Majlessi, M. Simsova et al., “High frequency of CD4+ T cells specific for the TB10.4 protein correlates with protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 3396– 3407, 2006. B. M. Sullivan, O. Jobe, V. Lazarevic et al., “Increased susceptibility of mice lacking T-bet to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis correlates with increased IL-10 and decreased IFN-γ production,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 175, no. 7, pp. 4593–4602, 2005. D. N. Dao, L. Kremer, Y. Guérardel et al., “Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipomannan induces apoptosis and interleukin12 production in macrophages,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 2067–2074, 2004. C. Manca, M. B. Reed, S. Freeman et al., “Differential monocyte activation underlies strain-specific Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenesis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 5511–5514, 2004. 7 [17] M. B. Reed, P. Domenech, C. Manca et al., “A glycolipid of hypervirulent tuberculosis strains that inhibits the innate immune response,” Nature, vol. 430, no. 7004, pp. 84–87, 2004. [18] Y. van Kooyk and T. B. H. Geijtenbeek, “DC-SIGN: escape mechanism for pathogens,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 697–709, 2003. [19] G. T. Seah and G. A. W. Rook, “IL-4 influences apoptosis of mycobacterium-reactive lymphocytes in the presence of TNF-α,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 167, no. 3, pp. 1230– 1237, 2001. [20] A. Demissie, M. Abebe, A. Aseffa et al., “Healthy individuals that control a latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis express high levels of Th1 cytokines and the IL-4 antagonist IL-4δ2,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 11, pp. 6938–6943, 2004. [21] A. Demissie, L. Wassie, M. Abebe et al., “The 6-kilodalton early secreted antigenic target-responsive, asymptomatic contacts of tuberculosis patients express elevated levels of interleukin-4 and reduced levels of gamma interferon,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 2817–2822, 2006. [22] H. A. Fletcher, P. Owiafe, D. Jeffries et al., “Increased expression of mRNA encoding interleukin (IL)-4 and its splice variant IL-4δ2 in cells from contacts of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, in the absence of in vitro stimulation,” Immunology, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 669–673, 2004. [23] D. J. Ordway, L. Costa, M. Martins et al., “Increased interleukin-4 production by CD8 and γδ T cells in healthcare workers is associated with the subsequent development of active tuberculosis,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 190, no. 4, pp. 756–766, 2004. [24] D. J. Ordway, L. Pinto, L. Costa et al., “Gamma delta T cell responses associated with the development of tuberculosis in health care workers,” FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 339–350, 2005. [25] L. Wassie, A. Demissie, A. Aseffa et al., “Ex vivo cytokine mRNA levels correlate with changing clinical status of Ethiopian TB patients and their contacts over time,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 1, Article ID e1522, 2008. [26] H. P. Wu, C. L. Wu, C. C. Yu, YU. C. Liu, and D. Y. Chuang, “Efficiency of interleukin-4 expression in patients with tuberculosis and nontubercular pneumonia,” Human Immunology, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 832–838, 2007. [27] M. G. Gutierrez, S. S. Master, S. B. Singh, G. A. Taylor, M. I. Colombo, and V. Deretic, “Autophagy is a defense mechanism inhibiting BCG and Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival in infected macrophages,” Cell, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 753–766, 2004. [28] L. Kremer, J. Estaquier, E. Brandt, J. C. Ameisen, and C. Locht, “Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette Guerin infection prevents apoptosis of resting human monocytes,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 2450– 2456, 1997. [29] M. Bocchino, D. Galati, A. Sanduzzi, V. Colizzi, E. Brunetti, and G. Mancino, “Role of mycobacteria-induced monocyte/macrophage apoptosis in the pathogenesis of human tuberculosis,” International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 375–383, 2005. [30] M. Rojas, L. F. Barrera, G. Puzo, and L. F. Garcia, “Differential induction of apoptosis by virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis in resistant and susceptible murine macrophages: role of nitric oxide and mycobacterial products,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 1352–1361, 1997. 8 [31] M. B. Santucci, M. Amicosante, R. Cicconi et al., “Mycobacterium tuberculosis-induced apoptosis in monocytes/macrophages: early membrane modifications and intracellular mycobacterial viability,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 1506–1509, 2000. [32] J. Keane, M. K. Balcewicz-Sablinska, H. G. Remold et al., “Infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis promotes human alveolar macrophage apoptosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 298–304, 1997. [33] J. Keane, H. G. Remold, and H. Kornfeld, “Virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains evade apoptosis of infected alveolar macrophages,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 2016–2020, 2000. [34] S. M. Behar, M. Divangahi, and H. G. Remold, “Evasion of innate immunity by mycobacterium tuberculosis: is death an exit strategy?” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 668–674, 2010. [35] V. Briken and J. L. Miller, “Living on the edge: inhibition of host cell apoptosis by Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Future Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 415–422, 2008. [36] M. Gonzalez-Juarrero, O. C. Turner, J. Turner, P. Marietta, J. V. Brooks, and I. M. Orme, “Temporal and spatial arrangement of lymphocytes within lung granulomas induced by aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1722–1728, 2001. [37] D. G. Russell, C. E. Barry, and J. L. Flynn, “Tuberculosis: what we don’t know can, and does, hurt us,” Science, vol. 328, no. 5980, pp. 852–856, 2010. [38] D. G. Russell, “Mycobacterium tuberculosis: here today, and here tomorrow,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 569–577, 2001. [39] J. Korf, A. Stoltz, J. Verschoor, P. De Baetselier, and J. Grooten, “The Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell wall component mycolic acid elicits pathogen-associated host innate immune responses,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 890–900, 2005. [40] R. Brosch, A. S. Pym, S. V. Gordon, and S. T. Cole, “The evolution of mycobacterial pathogenicity: clues from comparative genomics,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 452–458, 2001. [41] M. I. de Jonge, R. Brosch, P. Brodin, C. Demangel, and S. T. Cole, “Tuberculosis: from genome to vaccine,” Expert Review of Vaccines, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 541–551, 2005. [42] J. C. Betts, P. T. Lukey, L. C. Robb, R. A. McAdam, and K. Duncan, “Evaluation of a nutrient starvation model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis persistence by gene and protein expression profiling,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 717–731, 2002. [43] V. Deretic, S. Singh, S. Master et al., “Mycobacterium tuberculosis inhibition of phagolysosome biogenesis and autophagy as a host defence mechanism,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 719–727, 2006. [44] S. Axelrod, H. Oschkinat, J. Enders et al., “Delay of phagosome maturation by a mycobacterial lipid is reversed by nitric oxide,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1530–1545, 2008. [45] A. S. Davis, I. Vergne, S. S. Master, G. B. Kyei, J. Chua, and V. Deretic, “Mechanism of inducible nitric oxide synthase exclusion from mycobacterial phagosomes,” PLoS pathogens, vol. 3, no. 12, article e186, 2007. [46] S. J. Greent, L. F. Scheller, M. A. Marletta et al., “Nitric oxide: cytokine-regulation of nitric oxide in host resistance to intracellular pathogens,” Immunology Letters, vol. 43, no. 1-2, pp. 87–94, 1994. Clinical and Developmental Immunology [47] C. Nathan, “Role of iNOS in human host defense,” Science, vol. 312, no. 5782, p. 1874, 2006. [48] T. Schön, G. Elmberger, Y. Negesse, R. Hernandez Pando, T. Sundqvist, and S. Britton, “Local production of nitric oxide in patients with tuberculosis,” International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1134–1137, 2004. [49] R. W. Stokes, R. Norris-Jones, D. E. Brooks, T. J. Beveridge, D. Doxsee, and L. M. Thorson, “The glycan-rich outer layer of the cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis acts as an antiphagocytic capsule limiting the association of the bacterium with macrophages,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 5676–5686, 2004. [50] E. K. Jo, C. S. Yang, C. H. Choi, and C. V. Harding, “Intracellular signalling cascades regulating innate immune responses to Mycobacteria: branching out from Toll-like receptors,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1087–1098, 2007. [51] V. Quesniaux, C. Fremond, M. Jacobs et al., “Toll-like receptor pathways in the immune responses to mycobacteria,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 946–959, 2004. [52] P. Salgame, “Host innate and Th1 responses and the bacterial factors that control Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 374–380, 2005. [53] S. Stenger and R. L. Modlin, “Control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through mammalian Toll-like receptors,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 452–457, 2002. [54] N. Reiling, S. Ehlers, and C. Hölscher, “MyDths and unTOLLed truths: sensor, instructive and effector immunity to tuberculosis,” Immunology Letters, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 15–23, 2008. [55] M. Henao-Tamayo, A. P. Junqueira-Kipnis, D. Ordway et al., “A mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lacking the 19-kDa lipoprotein Rv3763 is highly attenuated in vivo but retains potent vaccinogenic properties,” Vaccine, vol. 25, no. 41, pp. 7153–7159, 2007. [56] V. V. Yeremeev, I. V. Lyadova, B. V. Nikonenko et al., “The 19-kD antigen and protective immunity in a murine model of tuberculosis,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 274–279, 2000. [57] I. Sugawara, H. Yamada, C. Li, S. Mizuno, O. Takeuchi, and S. Akira, “Mycobacterial infection in TLR2 and TLR6 knockout mice,” Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 327– 336, 2003. [58] K. Takeda, O. Takeuchi, and S. Akira, “Recognition of lipopeptides by Toll-like receptors,” Journal of Endotoxin Research, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 459–463, 2002. [59] R. K. Pai, M. E. Pennini, A. A. R. Tobian, D. H. Canaday, W. H. Boom, and C. V. Harding, “Prolonged toll-like receptor signaling by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and its 19kilodalton lipoprotein inhibits gamma interferon-induced regulation of selected genes in macrophages,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 6603–6614, 2004. [60] S. M. Fortune, A. Solache, A. Jaeger et al., “Mycobacterium tuberculosis inhibits macrophage responses to IFNγ through myeloid differentiation factor 88-dependent and -independent mechanisms,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 10, pp. 6272–6280, 2004. [61] E. H. Noss, R. K. Pai, T. J. Sellati et al., “Toll-like receptor 2-dependent inhibition of macrophage class II MHC Clinical and Developmental Immunology [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] expression and antigen processing by 19-kDa lipoprotein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 910–918, 2001. S. K. Pathak, S. Basu, K. K. Basu et al., “Direct extracellular interaction between the early secreted antigen ESAT-6 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and TLR2 inhibits TLR signaling in macrophages,” Nature Immunology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 610–618, 2007. B. Samten, X. Wang, and P. F. Barnes, “Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESX-1 system-secreted protein ESAT-6 but not CFP10 inhibits human T-cell immune responses,” Tuberculosis, vol. 89, supplement 1, pp. S74–S76, 2009. L. Tsenova, E. Ellison, R. Harbacheuski et al., “Virulence of selected Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates in the rabbit model of meningitis is dependent on phenolic glycolipid produced by the bacilli,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 192, no. 1, pp. 98–106, 2005. D. Sinsimer, G. Huet, C. Manca et al., “The phenolic glycolipid of Mycobacterium tuberculosis differentially modulates the early host cytokine response but does not in itself confer hypervirulence,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 3027–3036, 2008. B. J. Appelmelk, I. van Die, S. J. van Vliet, C. M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls, T. B. H. Geijtenbeek, and Y. Van Kooyk, “Cutting edge: carbohydrate profiling identifies new pathogens that interact with dendritic cell-specific ICAM-3grabbing nonintegrin on dendritic cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 170, no. 4, pp. 1635–1639, 2003. S. Jang, A. Uzelac, and P. Salgame, “Distinct chemokine and cytokine gene expression pattern of murine dendritic cells and macrophages in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1264–1270, 2008. J. O. Olobo, M. Geletu, A. Demissie et al., “Circulating TNFα, TGF-β, and IL-10 in tuberculosis patients and healthy contacts,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 2001. S. Redpath, P. Ghazal, and N. R. J. Gascoigne, “Hijacking and exploitation of IL-10 by intracellular pathogens,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 86–92, 2001. R. de Jong, F. Altare, I. A. Haagen et al., “Severe mycobacterial and Salmonella infections in interleukin-12 receptordeficient patients,” Science, vol. 280, no. 5368, pp. 1435–1438, 1998. H. W. Tso, L. L. Yu, C. M. Tam, H. S. Wong, and A. K. S. Chiang, “Associations between IL12B polymorphisms and tuberculosis in the Hong Kong Chinese population,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 190, no. 5, pp. 913–919, 2004. A. M. Cooper, D. K. Dalton, T. A. Stewart, J. P. Griffin, D. G. Russell, and I. M. Orme, “Disseminated tuberculosis in interferon γ gene-disrupted mice,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 2243–2247, 1993. J. L. Flynn, J. Chan, K. J. Triebold, D. K. Dalton, T. A. Stewart, and B. R. Bloom, “An essential role for interferon γ in resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 2249– 2254, 1993. T. H. M. Ottenhoff, F. A. W. Verreck, M. A. Hoeve, and E. van de Vosse, “Control of human host immunity to mycobacteria,” Tuberculosis, vol. 85, no. 1-2, pp. 53–64, 2005. B. M. Saunders, A. A. Frank, I. M. Orme, and A. M. Cooper, “CD4 is required for the development of a protective granulomatous response to pulmonary tuberculosis,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 216, no. 1-2, pp. 65–72, 2002. 9 [76] C. A. Scanga, V. P. Mohan, K. Yu et al., “Depletion of CD4+ T cells causes reactivation of murine persistent tuberculosis despite continued expression of interferon γ and nitric oxide synthase 2,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 347–358, 2000. [77] V. Lazarevic, D. Nolt, and J. L. Flynn, “Long-term control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is mediated by dynamic immune responses,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 1107–1117, 2005. [78] D. Sud, C. Bigbee, J. L. Flynn, and D. E. Kirschner, “Contribution of CD8+ T cells to control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 7, pp. 4296–4314, 2006. [79] J. S. M. Woodworth and S. M. Behar, “Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD8+ T cells and their role in immunity,” Critical Reviews in Immunology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 317– 352, 2006. [80] A. Sodhi, J. H. Gong, C. Silva, D. Qian, and P. F. Barnes, “Clinical correlates of interferon γ production in patients with tuberculosis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 617–620, 1997. [81] K. V. Jalapathy, C. Prabha, and S. D. Das, “Correlates of protective immune response in tuberculous pleuritis,” FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 139–145, 2004. [82] M. C. Jiménez-Martı́nez, M. Linares, R. Báez et al., “Intracellular expression of interleukin-4 and interferon-γ by a Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen-stimulated CD4+ CD57+ T-cell subpopulation with memory phenotype in tuberculosis patients,” Immunology, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 100– 106, 2004. [83] T. Roberts, N. Beyers, A. Aguirre, and G. Walzl, “Immunosuppression during active tuberculosis is characterized by decreased interferon-γ production and CD25 expression with elevated forkhead box P3 , transforming growth factorβ, and interleukin-4 mRNA levels,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 195, no. 6, pp. 870–878, 2007. [84] J. F. D. Siawaya, N. B. Bapela, K. Ronacher, N. Beyers, P. Van Helden, and G. Walzl, “Differential expression of interleukin4 (IL-4) and IL-4δ2 mRNA, but not transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), TGF-βRII, Foxp3, gamma interferon, T-bet, or GATA-3 mRNA, in patients with fast and slow responses to antituberculosis treatment,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1165–1170, 2008. [85] D. M. da Fonseca, C. L. Silva, P. F. Wowk et al., “Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture filtrate proteins plus CpG oligodeoxynucleotides confer protection to Mycobacterium bovis BCG-primed mice by inhibiting interleukin-4 secretion,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 5311– 5321, 2009. [86] S. G. Rhodes, J. Sawyer, A. O. Whelan et al., “Is interleukin4δ3 splice variant expression in bovine tuberculosis a marker of protective immunity?” Infection and Immunity, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 3006–3013, 2007. [87] E. Sahiratmadja, B. Alisjahbana, T. De Boer et al., “Dynamic changes in pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine profiles and gamma interferon receptor signaling integrity correlate with tuberculosis disease activity and response to curative treatment,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 820– 829, 2007. [88] K. R. Morris, R. D. Lutz, X. Bai et al., “Suppression of IFNγ + mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan-induced NO by IL-4 is due to decreased IRF-1 expression,” Tuberculosis, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 294–303, 2009. 10 [89] Anon, “Tuberculosis associated with blocking agents against tumor necrosis factor-alpha—California, 2002-2003,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report , vol. 53, no. 30, pp. 683– 686, 2004. [90] J. J. Gómez-Reino, L. Carmona, V. Rodrı́guez Valverde, E. M. Mola, and M. D. Montero, “Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors may predispose to significant increase in tuberculosis risk: a multicenter activesurveillance report,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 2122–2127, 2003. [91] J. Bezuidenhout, T. Roberts, L. Muller, P. van Helden, and G. Walzl, “Pleural tuberculosis in patients with early HIV infection is associated with increased TNF-alpha expression and necrosis in granulomas,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 1, Article ID e4228, 2009. [92] S. Sharma and M. Bose, “Role of cytokines in immune response to pulmonary tuberculosis,” Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 213–219, 2001. [93] J. L. Barks, J. J. McQuillan, and M. F. Iademarco, “TNFα and IL-4 synergistically increase vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 159, no. 9, pp. 4532–4538, 1997. [94] M. F. Iademarco, J. L. Barks, and D. C. Dean, “Regulation of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression by IL-4 and TNF-α in cultured endothelial cells,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 264–271, 1995. [95] N. R. Patel, J. Zhu, S. D. Tachado et al., “HIV impairs TNF-α mediated macrophage apoptotic response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 10, pp. 6973–6980, 2007. [96] M. Divangahi, D. Desjardins, C. Nunes-Alves, H. G. Remold, and S. M. Behar, “Eicosanoid pathways regulate adaptive immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Nature Immunology, vol. 11, pp. 751–758, 2010. [97] S. Marino, A. Myers, J. L. Flynn, and D. E. Kirschner, “TNF and IL-10 are major factors in modulation of the phagocytic cell environment in lung and lymph node in tuberculosis: a next-generation two-compartmental model,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 265, no. 4, pp. 586–598, 2010. [98] S. Stenger, “Immunological control of tuberculosis: role of tumour necrosis factor and more,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 64, supplement 4, pp. iv24–iv28, 2005. [99] L. Kremer, J. Estaquier, I. Wolowczuk, F. Biet, J. C. Ameisen, and C. Locht, “Ineffective cellular immune response associated with T-cell apoptosis in susceptible Mycobacterium bovis BCG-infected mice,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 4264–4273, 2000. [100] C. Loeuillet, F. Martinon, C. Perez, M. Munoz, M. Thome, and P. R. Meylan, “Mycobacterium tuberculosis subverts innate immunity to evade specific effectors,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 9, pp. 6245–6255, 2006. [101] Y. Ozeki, K. Kaneda, N. Fujiwara, M. Morimoto, S. Oka, and I. Yano, “In vivo induction of apoptosis in the thymus by administration of mycobacterial cord factor (trehalose 6,6′ -dimycolate),” Infection and Immunity, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1793–1799, 1997. [102] R. Placido, G. Mancino, A. Amendola et al., “Apoptosis of human monocytes/macrophages in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 31– 38, 1997. [103] V. A. Rı́os-Barrera, V. Campos-Peña, D. Aguilar-León et al., “Macrophage and T lymphocyte apoptosis during experimental pulmonary tuberculosis: their relationship to Clinical and Developmental Immunology [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] mycobacterial virulence,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 345–353, 2006. P. M. Roger and L. E. Bermudez, “Infection of mice with Mycobacterium avium primes CD8+ lymphocytes for apoptosis upon exposure to macrophages,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 378–386, 2001. V. E. Watson, L. L. Hill, L. B. Owen-Schaub et al., “Apoptosis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice exhibiting varied immunopathology,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 211–220, 2000. F. Budak, E. K. Uzaslan, S. Cangur, G. Goral, and H. B. Oral, “Increased pleural soluble Fas ligand (sFasL) levels in tuberculosis pleurisy and its relation with T-helper type 1 cytokines,” Lung, vol. 186, no. 5, pp. 337–343, 2008. H. Gan, J. Lee, F. Ren, M. Chen, H. Kornfeld, and H. G. Remold, “Mycobacterium tuberculosis blocks crosslinking of annexin-1 and apoptotic envelope formation on infected macrophages to maintain virulence,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1189–1197, 2008. T. Mustafa, S. J. Mogga, S. G. M. Mfinanga, O. Mørkve, and L. Sviland, “Significance of Fas and Fas ligand in tuberculous lymphadenitis,” Immunology, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 255–262, 2005. S. A. Porcelli and W. R. Jacobs, “Tuberculosis: unsealing the apoptotic envelope,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1101–1102, 2008. I. Kramnik, “Genetic dissection of host resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis: the sst1 locus and the Ipr1 gene,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 321, pp. 123–148, 2008. J. S. Park, M. H. Tamayo, M. Gonzalez-Juarrero, I. M. Orme, and D. J. Ordway, “Virulent clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis grow rapidly and induce cellular necrosis but minimal apoptosis in murine macrophages,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 80–86, 2006. A. K. Randhawa, H. J. Ziltener, and R. W. Stokes, “CD43 controls the intracellular growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through the induction of TNF-α-mediated apoptosis,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 2105–2117, 2008. K. Velmurugan, B. Chen, J. L. Miller et al., “Mycobacterium tuberculosis nuoG is a virulence gene that inhibits apoptosis of infected host cells.,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 3, no. 7, article e110, 2007. X. Y. He, L. Xiao, H. B. Chen et al., “T regulatory cells and Th1/Th2 cytokines in peripheral blood from tuberculosis patients,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 643–650, 2010. K. Dheda, H. Booth, J. F. Huggett, M. A. Johnson, A. Zumla, and G. A. W. Rook, “Lung remodeling in pulmonary tuberculosis,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 192, no. 7, pp. 1201–1210, 2005. R. Hernandez-Pando and G. A. W. Rook, “The role of TNFα in T-cell mediated inflammation depends on the Th1/Th2 cytokine balance,” Immunology, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 591–595, 1994. L. D. Aguilar, M. Hanekom, D. Mata et al., “Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains with the Beijing genotype demonstrate variability in virulence associated with transmission,” Tuberculosis, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 319–325, 2010. S. Kausalya, R. Somogyi, A. Orlofsky, and M. B. Prystowsky, “Requirement of A1-α for bacillus Calmette-Guérinmediated protection of macrophages against nitric oxideinduced apoptosis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 166, no. 7, pp. 4721–4727, 2001. Clinical and Developmental Immunology [119] M. Krzyzowska, A. Schollenberger, A. Pawłowski et al., “Lipoarabinomannan as a regulator of the monocyte apoptotic response to Mycobacterium bovis BCG danish strain 1331 infection,” Polish Journal of Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 89–96, 2007. [120] S. J. Mogga, T. Mustafa, L. Sviland, and R. Nilsen, “Increased Bcl-2 and reduced Bax expression in infected macrophages in slowly progressive primary murine Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 383–391, 2002. [121] L. M. Sly, S. M. Hingley-Wilson, N. E. Reiner, and W. R. McMaster, “Survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in host macrophages involves resistance to apoptosis dependent upon induction of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family member Mcl1,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 430–437, 2003. [122] J. Zhang, R. Jiang, H. Takayama, and Y. Tanaka, “Survival of virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis involves preventing apoptosis induced by Bcl-2 upregulation and release resulting from necrosis in J774 macrophages,” Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 845–852, 2005. [123] C. J. Riendeau and H. Kornfeld, “THP-1 cell apoptosis in response to Mycobacterial infection,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 254–259, 2003. [124] J. Lee, H. G. Remold, M. H. Ieong, and H. Kornfeld, “Macrophage apoptosis in response to high intracellular burden of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is mediated by a novel caspase-independent pathway,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 7, pp. 4267–4274, 2006. [125] K. Klingler, K. M. Tchou-Wong, O. Brändli et al., “Effects of mycobacteria on regulation of apoptosis in mononuclear phagocytes,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 5272–5278, 1997. [126] M. J. Kim, H. C. Wainwright, M. Locketz et al., “Caseation of human tuberculosis granulomas correlates with elevated host lipid metabolism,” EMBO Molecular Medicine, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 258–274, 2010. [127] A. Dasgupta, K. Sureka, D. Mitra et al., “An oligopeptide transporter of Mycobacterium tuberculosis regulates cytokine release and apoptosis of infected macrophages,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 8, Article ID e12225, 2010. [128] L. Danelishvili, Y. Yamazaki, J. Selker, and L. E. Bermudez, “Secreted Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv3654c and Rv3655c proteins participate in the suppression of macrophage apoptosis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 5, Article ID e10474, 2010. [129] M. K. Balcewicz-Sablinska, J. Keane, H. Kornfeld, and H. G. Remold, “Pathogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis evades apoptosis of host macrophages by release of TNF-R2, resulting in inactivation of TNF-α,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 161, no. 5, pp. 2636–2641, 1998. [130] J. Lee, M. Hartman, and H. Kornfeld, “Macrophage apoptosis in tuberculosis,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1– 11, 2009. [131] J. Hinchey, S. Lee, B. Y. Jeon et al., “Enhanced priming of adaptive immunity by a proapoptotic mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 117, no. 8, pp. 2279–2288, 2007. [132] J. L. Miller, K. Velmurugan, M. J. Cowan, and V. Briken, “The type I NADH dehydrogenase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis counters phagosomal NOX2 activity to inhibit TNF-alphamediated host cell apoptosis,” PLoS pathogens, vol. 6, no. 4, Article ID e1000864, 2010. 11 [133] G. Stadthagen, M. Jackson, P. Charles et al., “Comparative investigation of the pathogenicity of three Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutants defective in the synthesis of phydroxybenzoic acid derivatives,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 2245–2253, 2006. [134] G. A. W. Rook, R. Hernandez-Pando, K. Dheda, and G. Teng Seah, “IL-4 in tuberculosis: implications for vaccine design,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 483–488, 2004. [135] R. Hernandez-Pando, D. Aguilar, M. L. G. Hernandez, H. Orozco, and G. A. W. Rook, “Pulmonary tuberculosis in BALB/c mice with non-functional IL-4 genes: changes in the inflammatory effects of TNF-α and in the regulation of fibrosis,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 174–183, 2004. [136] P. L. Lin, A. Myers, L. Smith et al., “Tumor necrosis factor neutralization results in disseminated disease in acute and latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection with normal granuloma structure in a cynomolgus macaque model,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 340–350, 2010. [137] V. W. Ho and L. M. Sly, “Derivation and characterization of murine alternatively activated (M2) macrophages,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 531, pp. 173–185, 2009. [138] F. O. Martinez, A. Sica, A. Mantovani, and M. Locati, “Macrophage activation and polarization,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 453–461, 2008. [139] E. F. Redente, D. M. Higgins, L. D. Dwyer-Nield, I. M. Orme, M. Gonzalez-Juarrero, and A. M. Malkinson, “Differential polarization of alveolar macrophages and bone marrowderived monocytes following chemically and pathogeninduced chronic lung inflammation,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 159–168, 2010. [140] G. Corna, L. Campana, E. Pignatti et al., “Polarization dictates iron handling by inflammatory and alternatively activated macrophages,” Haematologica, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 1814–1822, 2010. [141] J. P. Edwards, X. Zhang, K. A. Frauwirth, and D. M. Mosser, “Biochemical and functional characterization of three activated macrophage populations,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1298–1307, 2006.