Applied Catalysis A: General 237 (2002) 171–180
Dehydrogenation of methanol over copper-containing catalysts
T.P. Minyukova a,∗ , I.I. Simentsova a , A.V. Khasin a , N.V. Shtertser b ,
N.A. Baronskaya a , A.A. Khassin a , T.M. Yurieva a
a
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, 5, Pr. Lavrentieva, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
b Novosibirsk State University, 2, Ul. Pirogova, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
Received 18 October 2001; received in revised form 23 May 2002; accepted 28 May 2002
Abstract
The catalytic properties in methanol dehydrogenation of copper metal formed as a result of reduction by hydrogen of
copper-containing oxides with different structure: copper chromite (tetragonally distorted spinel), copper hydroxysilicate
(Chrysocolla), and copper-zinc hydroxysilicate (Zincsilite) have been studied. This process proceeds via successive reactions:
(I) 2CH3 OH = CH3 OOCH + 2H2 and (II) CH3 OOCH = 2CO + 2H2 .
The methyl formate selectivity for the catalysts studied was close to 1.0 at low methanol conversion, X ≤ 0.1, where the
dehydrogenation process is represented by reaction (I), occurring far from its equilibrium. At 0.2 ≤ X ≤ 0.55, the selectivity
decreases with increasing conversion, and the ratio of the activities in successive reactions may serve as a comparative
characteristic for the catalysts. At high conversions, when reaction (I) is close to its equilibrium, selectivity is independent of
the properties of studied catalysts and depends on the methanol conversion.
Reaction (I) shows low sensitivity to the state of metal copper of reduced catalysts and, hence, low sensitivity to the
composition and structure of oxides-precursors. The catalysts’ activity in reaction (II) greatly depends on the state of metal
copper in the catalysts. It was assumed that the catalyst activity in methyl formate conversion to CO and H2 and, hence,
the selectivity of methanol dehydrogenation with respect to methyl formate in the region of moderate methanol conversion
depends on the strength of interaction between metal copper particles and catalyst oxide surface, which is determined by the
composition and structure of oxide-precursor.
© 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Methanol dehydrogenation; Methyl formate; Cu-containing catalysts
1. Introduction
CH3 OOCH = 2CO + 2H2 .
The consecutive reactions of methanol dehydrogenation yielding methyl formate as an intermediate
were shown to occur over the copper-containing
catalyst of methanol synthesis [1,2]:
In addition, a direct decomposition of methanol into
CO and H2 is likely to occur (the reaction reverse of
methanol synthesis):
2CH3 OH = CH3 OOCH + 2H2 ,
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +7-3832-34-41-09;
fax: +7-3832-34-30-56.
E-mail address: min@catalysis.nsk.su (T.P. Minyukova).
(I)
CH3 OH = CO + 2H2 .
(II)
(III)
The reactions differ essentially in their thermodynamic properties. According to Stull et al. [3], at
473 K the values of equilibrium constants, Kp , for
these reactions are Kp (I) = 3.4 × 10−2 , Kp (II) =
0926-860X/02/$ – see front matter © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 2 6 - 8 6 0 X ( 0 2 ) 0 0 3 2 8 - 9
172
T.P. Minyukova et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 237 (2002) 171–180
2.0 × 104 , Kp (III) = 2.6 × 10. It means that the equilibrium conditions are most unfavorable for reaction
(I), significantly limiting its occurrence. The equilibrium conditions are more favorable for reaction (III),
and reaction (II) has practically no thermodynamic
restriction.
Studies on dehydrogenation of methanol are of
practical interest since methyl formate is a valuable
product used for synthesis of various organic compounds [4]. Studies in this field are also important
for the theory of catalytic syntheses from CO and
H2 .
Recently, many studies were performed on dehydrogenation of methanol over copper oxide-containing
catalysts, among them copper-silicon [5–8], coppertitanium and copper-zirconium [6], copper-zinc and
copper-cerium [9], copper-chromium [10], copperaluminum [11], and copper-containing catalysts of
methanol synthesis [1,2]. These studies provided the
data on the catalysts’ activity and selectivity with
respect to the formation of methyl formate, and on
the kinetics and mechanism of the methanol dehydrogenation reactions.
Copper oxide-containing catalysts are active in the
methanol dehydrogenation reaction only after their
reductive activation with hydrogen. The opinions on
the nature of active component are different, e.g. the
authors of [11] believe all three copper states, Cu2+ ,
Cu+ , and Cu0 , to be active. At the same time, many
researchers [5–10] supposed that the activity is determined by the particles of metal copper forming at
the oxide surface as a result of hydrogen activation.
In the latter case, no exhaustive explanation of the
dependence of catalytic properties of copper on its
dispersion and morphology is made in the literature.
The data on the effect of oxide-precursor structure
and composition on the catalytic properties of copper
are also lacking.
In the present work, a study of the catalytic
properties was performed for copper, obtained via
the reductive activation with hydrogen of coppercontaining oxide compounds of various composition,
namely:
• copper chromite (CuCr2 O4 ) with a tetragonally distorted spinel structure;
• copper hydroxysilicate (Cu:Si = 0.14:0.86) with
Chrysocolla mineral structure;
• copper-zinc hydroxysilicate (Cu:Zn:Si = 0.13:0.30:
0.57) with Zincsilite mineral (TOT trioctahedral
phyllosilicate) structure.
The structure and composition of reduced catalysts were studied previously [12–15] using various
physico-chemical methods. The resulting particles of
metal copper in these catalysts were shown to have
different morphology and dispersion.
2. Experimental procedure
2.1. Catalyst preparation
The samples of copper hydroxysilicate with Cu:
Si = 0.14:0.86 and copper-zinc hydroxysilicate with
Cu:Zn:Si = 0.13:0.30:0.57 were prepared by the
deposition–precipitation method at a gradually increasing pH from the appropriate mixtures of aqueous
solutions of copper and zinc nitrates with aerosol suspended in urea, and calcined at 723 K in flowing air
[16].
The copper chromite sample CuCr2 O4 was prepared via thermal decomposition of coprecipitated
copper-chromium hydroxycarbonate carried out in air
at 1173 K.
Then the catalysts were reduced in flowing hydrogen at the following temperatures: 533 K for copper hydroxysilicate (CS-0.14), 533 K for copper-zinc
hydroxysilicate (CZS-0.13-1), 653 K for copper-zinc
hydroxysilicate (CZS-0.13-2), and 573 K for copper
chromite (Cu-Cr).
2.2. Catalyst characterization
Thermal analysis (STA), infrared spectroscopy
(IRS), X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), and electron
microscopy (EM) were used at every preparation step
to control the conformity of the obtained samples’
composition and structure to the results of previous studies on the catalysts forming under the given
conditions [12–15].
Thermal analysis was made with a Netzsch STA409 with 50–100 mg samples in platinum crucibles
in hydrogen flowing at 150 ml/min and increasing the
temperature at 5 K/min.
Infrared transmission spectra were recorded in the
region of 400–4000 cm−1 with a Bomem MB-102
T.P. Minyukova et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 237 (2002) 171–180
Fourier spectrometer. The samples were prepared as
pellets with CsI.
The X-ray diffraction study was performed with a
Siemens D-500 diffractometer under monochromatic
Cu K␣ radiation.
The electron microscopy study was conducted using a JEM-100CX transmission electron microscope.
The samples for the study were prepared as an alcohol suspension supported over perforated carbon
film-supports after ultrasound dispersion.
The surface area of metal copper in the reduced
samples was determined via titration with nitrous oxide using pulse chromatography [17]. The surface area
was calculated from the amount of fast-interacted N2 O
for exclusion of copper metal bulk oxidation influence in accordance with [18]. The calculation was performed using the assumption that one oxygen atom is
bound by two surface copper atoms, and the number
of copper atoms/1 m2 is 1.46 × 1019 [19]. The metal
copper surface area was evaluated also from the XRD
and EM data.
vity detector. No analytic measurement of the hydrogen concentration CH2 was made, it was calculated
from the methyl formate and carbon monoxide concentrations on the basis of stoichiometric ratios according to Eq. (1):
CH2 = 2Cmf + 2CCO .
The catalytic properties of the samples were studied
by the continuous flow method at atmospheric pressure
in a temperature range of 423–543 K. Catalyst grains
of size 0.25–1.0 mm, mixed with the quartz particles,
were loaded in the reactor.
Before the reaction, the initial samples were activated in a hydrogen flow at the temperatures indicated
above. The temperature was elevated at the rate of
2 K/min, and then the catalyst was kept in hydrogen
flow for 2 h at a specified temperature. After the activation, the initial mixture, containing 0.14–0.16 molar fractions of methanol in helium, was fed to the
catalyst. The temperature of experiment was set, and
after an hour the composition of the reaction mixture at the reactor outlet was successively analyzed
several times (to the point of establishing a constant
0 (in
composition). The concentrations of methanol, Cm
the initial mixture) and Cm (in the reactor outlet mixture), of methyl formate, Cmf , and carbon monoxide,
CCO , were determined chromatographically and expressed in terms of their molar fractions. No substantial amounts of other carbon-containing products were
found in the experiments. The analysis was made with
a flame-ionization detector and a thermal conducti-
(1)
Conversion degree (X) and selectivity (S) were calculated by Eqs. (2) and (3), respectively:
X=
2Cmf + CCO
,
0 (1 − C
Cm
mf − 2CCO )
(2)
S=
2Cmf
.
2Cmf + CCO
(3)
Contact time (t) was determined as a ratio between
the catalyst volume loaded to the reactor (v) and
adjusted to normal conditions volume of the initial
steam-gas mixture fed in a unit time (V):
t=
2.3. Catalytic properties
173
v
.
V
(4)
Changing the amount of catalyst loaded and the
rate of steam–gas mixture feeding allowed to vary the
contact time from 0.02 to 3 s. The catalyst volume
was found as the ratio of the catalyst mass to its bulk
weight.
The reaction rates were calculated from the expression, which follows from the differential material
balance for the gas flow. In the case of low concentrations of the reaction mixture components it may be
represented by the following approximation:
W =
aNa
dC
×
,
Vm ρ
dt
(5)
where W is the reaction rate (molecule/g s); a the stoichiometric coefficient; C the concentration of component being consumed or formed (molar fraction);
Na the Avogadro number; Vm = 2.24 × 104 cm3 /mol
the volume of 1 mol gas under the normal conditions;
ρ the catalyst bulk weight (g/cm3 ) and t is the contact
time (s). Note that, despite the presence of the catalyst bulk weight in Eq. (5), the calculated rate values
are actually independent of ρ and relate to the catalyst weight unit, since implicitly ρ enters also into
denominator of the t value.
174
T.P. Minyukova et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 237 (2002) 171–180
Fig. 1. Experimental DTG (solid line) and DTA (dash line) profiles of the temperature programmed reduction in the hydrogen flow: (1)
sample CS-0.14, uncalcined; (2) sample CZS-0.13, calcined at 723 K in the inert gas flow.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Catalyst composition and structure
3.1.1. Copper hydroxysilicate of Chrysocolla
structure
Chrysocolla mineral with the Cu:Si ratio 1:1 contains a jelly-like sediment with crystal admixtures,
in which the presence of Si4 O10 layers was shown
[16]. The structure of hydroxysilicate retains with a
decrease in the Cu:Si ratio to 1:6 [14,16]. Chrysocolla remains stable up to 1200 K in air and in an inert medium. Reduction of copper hydroxysilicate with
hydrogen yielding the metal copper proceeds with
exothermic effect (the maximum at 455 K) accompanied by a weight loss. The observed effect of weight
loss at 520 K characterizes a structural rearrangement
with evolution of water. After the reduction at this
temperature, the sample consists of silicon oxide, with
copper particles located on its surface [15].
The STA, IRS, XRD, and EM studies of the CS-0.14
sample, obtained in the present work, showed the sample to be copper hydroxysilicate of Chrysocolla structure. The specific surface area of the CS-0.14 sample
calcined at 723 K was 390 m2 /g.
Fig. 1 shows DTG and DTA curves for the CS-0.14
sample reduction with hydrogen (curve 1). As expected, in accordance with [14,15], the sample reduction occurs at 455 K, and the structure is ruptured at
520 K. The 533 K was chosen as the temperature of
sample activation. After the reduction at 533 K, the
sample constitutes silicon oxide, with metal copper
particles of size 30–50 Å located at its surface, as it
was determined from XRD. According to the results
of N2 O titration, the surface area of metal copper comprised 31.0 m2 /g catalyst (Table 1).
Table 1
Characteristics of reduced samples
Sample
CS-0.14
CZS-0.13-1
CZS-0.13-2
Cu-Cr
Cu content in precursor (at.%)
Cu0 content (at.%)
Size of particles (Å)
Cu0 surface area (m2 /g catalyst)a
Cu0 surface area (m2 /g catalyst)b
14.0
14.0
30–50
∼27
31.0
13.0
4.3
30–70
∼7
8.0
13.0
8.4
30–70
∼13
7.0
33.3
14.0
50 × 100 × 100
∼8
6.0
a
b
Copper surface area was calculated from the structural data.
Surface area was determined by N2 O titration.
T.P. Minyukova et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 237 (2002) 171–180
3.1.2. Copper-zinc hydroxysilicate of Zincsilite
structure
Zincsilite has a layered structure and belongs to the
Smectite group. Zincsilite is represented by the formula Znx (Zn3−x 䊐x )[Si4 O10 ](OH)2 × nH2 O, where
Zn3−x are the zinc ions located at octahedral positions of the layers formed by [Si4 O10 ] tetrahedrons,
Znx are the zinc ions located in water interlayer, and
䊐x are the vacancies [20]. Copper ions partially substitute zinc ions in each structural position, being distributed among the ‘layer’ and ‘interlayer’ in a 2:1
ratio [14,15].
Copper ions are reduced with hydrogen in the following way [15]:
(a) Copper ions located between [Si4 O10 ] layers
(hereinafter referred to as copper ions located in
the Zincsilite ‘interlayer’) are reduced at a considerable rate in the temperature range of 493–533 K
producing metal copper particles. Copper ions
from the ‘interlayer’ are reduced completely.
(b) Copper ions at octahedral positions of the layers
formed by [Si4 O10 ] tetrahedrons (hereinafter referred to as copper ions located in the Zincsilite
‘layer’) are reduced giving metal copper as the
temperature increases from 553 K up to the point
of rupturing the structure at 753 K. At 653 K, ca.
50% of these ions are reduced, with the structure
being retained.
The STA, IRS, XRD, and EM studies of the
CZS-0.13 sample, obtained in the present work,
showed the sample to be copper-zinc hydroxysilicate
of Zincsilite structure. The specific surface area of the
CZS-0.13 sample calcined at 723 K was 420 m2 /g.
Fig. 1 shows DTG and DTA curves for the CZS-0.13
sample reduction (curve 2). The sample reduction
producing metal copper proceeds in two steps: at 530
and 610 K, which completely agree with the results of
[15]. So, the activation temperatures were chosen at
543 K (CZS-0.13-1 sample) and 653 K (CZS-0.13-2
sample). According to IRS, XRD and EM data,
the reduced samples represented hydroxysilicates
of Zincsilite structure, with metal copper particles
of size 30–70 Å located at its surface. According
to the results of N2 O titration, the surface area of
metal copper amounted 8.0 m2 /g for the CZS-0.13-1
sample, and 7.0 m2 /g for the CZS-0.13-2 sample
(Table 1).
175
3.1.3. Copper chromite
Copper chromite CuCr2 O4 has a spinel-like structure with tetragonal distortion of the lattice (a = 8.537
and c = 7.792 Å) and normal distribution of cations
[21]. As a result of interaction with hydrogen at
453–643 K, a partial (ca. 40% at 573 K) redox substitution of copper ions for protons occurs. In this case,
the spinel structure remains, and the metal copper
forms the plane particles of size 50 Å × 100 Å × 100 Å
at the spinel surface. Copper particles are well edged
and linked epitaxially with the spinel surface [12]. At
higher temperatures, chromite is destructed in hydrogen to give metal copper at the surface of chromium
oxide [22].
The STA, IRS, XRD, and EM studies of the Cu-Cr
sample, obtained in the present work, showed the sample to be a spinel with the lattice parameters indicated
above. The specific surface area of the Cu-Cr sample
was 3.3 m2 /g catalyst.
The sample under study was reduced at 573 K. According to the data of physico-chemical studies, its
composition corresponded completely to that of the
sample obtained in [12]. N2 O titration of the Cu-Cr
sample reduced at 573 K showed the surface area of
copper to be 6.0 m2 /g.
Table 1 lists the surface area values for copper
produced as a result of catalyst reduction with hydrogen. These values were obtained by titration with
nitrous oxide and calculated on the basis of structural studies. One may see that the surface area values for copper hydroxysilicate and copper chromite
obtained by different methods agree satisfactorily. In
the case of copper-zinc hydroxysilicate, an agreement
between the surface area values found by different
methods is observed only after the reduction at 543 K
(CZS-0.13-1 sample). As a result of catalyst reduction
at 653 K (CZS-0.13-2 sample), the amount of metal
copper increases up to 8.4 at.%, while the surface area
determined by N2 O titration shows no increase (it
even decreases to some extent), the particles size remains in the same range. These facts are discussed
below.
3.2. Catalytic properties
First of all, it is noteworthy that all the catalysts
under study exhibit catalytic activity in methanol
dehydrogenation only after reductive activation with
176
T.P. Minyukova et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 237 (2002) 171–180
Fig. 2. The contact time dependencies of methanol (䊉), methyl
formate (䉱) and carbon monoxide (䊏) concentrations in the
reactor outlet mixture and virtual methanol concentration (䊊) at
473 K for the Cu-Cr catalyst.
Fig. 4. The contact time dependencies of methanol (䊉), methyl
formate (䉱) and carbon monoxide (䊏) concentrations in the
reactor outlet mixture and virtual methanol concentration (䊊) at
473 K for the CZS-0.13-1 catalyst.
hydrogen. Figs. 2–5 show the contact time dependencies of the methanol, methyl formate, and carbon
monoxide concentrations in the reaction mixture at
the reactor outlet, obtained for catalysts pre-reduced
with hydrogen: for Cu-Cr (Fig. 2), CS-0.14 (Fig. 3),
and CZS-0.13-1 (Fig. 4) at 473 K, and for CZS-0.13-2
at 543 K (Fig. 5). Note that the observed dependencies
reflect the changing concentrations of components
over the whole length of the catalyst bed at a certain
linear rate of the reaction mixture flow. At a flow rate
Fig. 3. The contact time dependencies of methanol (䊉), methyl
formate (䉱) and carbon monoxide (䊏) concentrations in the
reactor outlet mixture and virtual methanol concentration (䊊) at
473 K for the CS-0.14 catalyst.
Fig. 5. The contact time dependencies of methanol (䊉), methyl
formate (䉱), and carbon monoxide (䊏) concentrations in the
reactor outlet mixture and virtual methanol concentration (䊊) at
543 K for the CZS-0.13-2 catalyst.
T.P. Minyukova et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 237 (2002) 171–180
of 1 cm/s, the dependencies will accurately reflect
the dependence of component concentrations on the
catalyst bed length.
For all catalysts, at very short contact time, the
methanol consumption is accompanied by methyl formate accumulation with no CO formation. Thus, the
selectivity of methyl formate formation approaches
unity. As the contact time increases, so does the
methyl formate concentration. Then, after reaching its
maximum, it decreases to a rather low value. CO formation becomes noticeable at certain values of contact time, which differ with the catalysts, and the CO
concentration increases with increasing contact time.
This function has an inflection point at the maximal
concentration of methyl formate. Such a character of
kinetic dependencies is clearly shown for catalysts
Cu-Cr, CS-0.14, and CZS-0.13-1 at 473 K, while at
this temperature in the case of the CZS-0.13-2 catalyst, its lower activity at the studied contact times
does not allow to reach the maximum of the methyl
formate concentration function and the inflection
point of the CO concentration versus contact time
curve. For the CZS-0.13-2 catalyst, the character of
these dependencies is revealed completely at a higher
reaction temperature, 543 K.
Thus, for all the catalysts studied, the kinetic regularity typical of successive reactions is observed: the
inflection point for the contact time function of the
end product (CO) corresponds to the maximum of
the intermediate product (methyl formate) concentration curve. Hence, under the given conditions,
methanol dehydrogenation proceeds stepwise by reactions (I) and (II), and no direct dehydrogenation of
methanol to CO and H2 by reaction (III) is observed.
The dotted line in Figs. 2–5 shows the contact time
∗.
dependence of the virtual methanol concentration Cm
Virtual concentration is the proposed methanol concentration, which would provide, for the observed process, the methanol equilibrium with methyl formate
and hydrogen at their observed concentrations. The
∗ values were found as methanol virtual pressures,
Cm
Pm∗ , from the expression for equilibrium constant of
reaction (I):
1/2
Pm∗
=
Pmf PH2
1/2
,
(6)
Kp
where Kp is the equilibrium constant of reaction (I),
177
Pmf and PH2 are the partial pressures of methyl formate and hydrogen expressed as fractions of atmosphere and, at atmospheric pressure, numerically equal
to the experimental concentrations of components expressed in molar fractions. This relationship shows
how closely reaction (I) approaches its equilibrium
under the conditions of successive occurrence of reaction (II). The analysis of reaction kinetics in terms
of virtual partial pressure was many times used before [23]. The virtual concentration of methanol increases rapidly in the range of short contact times and
low methanol conversions, and attains a value close
to the experimental concentration of methanol at t =
0.1–0.5 s for various catalysts. Further, with increasing
contact time, its value closely follows the experimentally observed dependence of methanol concentration
on the contact time.
The catalysts’ activity in reaction (I) was characterized by the rate of methyl formate production, W1 ,
corresponding to methanol concentration in the initial
mixture, via differentiation of the contact time dependence of methyl formate concentration, and calculated
according to formula (5) (in this case, a = 1). This
variable may be considered as the “initial rate” of reaction (I) in the sense that its value characterizes the
rate of the process at the beginning of the catalyst bed
and corresponds to the initial composition of the reaction mixture. As evident from experimental data, at
low conversion no distorting effect of the reverse reaction or the successive conversion of methyl formate
by reaction (II) on the determined rate of forward reaction (I) takes place.
The catalysts’ activity in reaction (II) was characterized by the maximum value of methyl formate
conversion rate W2 . The W2 rate was determined
via differentiation of the contact time dependence
of carbon monoxide concentration at the inflection
point and calculated by formula (5) (in this case,
a = 1/2). Using the carbon monoxide concentration
versus contact time dependence allows to exclude the
effect of methyl formate generation and consumption
in reversible reaction (I) on the determined value
of W2 .
The results of the study are summarized in Table 2,
which lists the rates of reactions (I) and (II) in reference to unit catalyst weight and to unit surface area of
metal copper, at 473 K and molar fractions of methanol
Cm = 0.14–0.16 and methyl formate Cmf = 0.018.
178
T.P. Minyukova et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 237 (2002) 171–180
Table 2
Catalysts’ activity in methanol dehydrogenation at 473 K
Sample
W1 (molecule/g s)
W2 (molecule/g s)
W1 (molecule/m2 s)a
W2 (molecule/m2 s)a
W1 /W2
CS-0.14
3.0
1.3
9.7
4.2
∼2
1019
×
× 1019
× 1017
× 1017
CZS-0.13-1
CZS-0.13-2
1018
1018
4.5
6.8
5.6
8.5
∼7
×
× 1017
× 1017
× 1016
3.3 ×
1.6 × 1017
4.7 × 1017
2.3 × 1016
∼20
Cu-Cr
7.7
8.0
1.3
1.3
10
×
×
×
×
1018
1017
1018
1017
See text for details.
a The values of copper surface area determined by N O titration were used (see Table 1).
2
These conditions were taken as standard for the comparison of catalyst activity.
The obtained experimental data allow only an approximate evaluation of apparent activation energies
for reactions (I) and (II). For all catalysts, the values of activation energy of reaction (I) were shown
to vary in the range of 75–90 kJ/mol, while for reaction (II) in the range of 70–90 kJ/mol. Note that
in [7] the apparent activation energy of reaction (I)
for a copper-silicon catalyst with a copper content of
4 wt.%, obtained by ion exchange, was found to be
63 kJ/mol, while the apparent activation energy of reaction (II) for a copper-containing methanol synthesis
catalyst was found in [2] to be equal to ca. 60 kJ/mol.
Since all the studied catalysts exhibit catalytic activity in methanol dehydrogenation only after their reductive activation with hydrogen, it seems reasonable
to compare the catalysts properties by the values of
their specific activity, i.e. the reaction rate referred to
unit surface area of metal copper.
One may see from Table 2 that the catalysts’ specific activities in reaction (I) differ no more than by a
factor of 2.5. Thus, with the activation energies also
not being much different, we may conclude that reaction (I) shows low sensitivity to the state of metal copper in reduced catalysts and, hence, low sensitivity to
the composition and structure of the oxide-precursor.
Specific activities in reaction (II) for the studied
catalysts show a more considerable variation: the extreme values differ ca. 20-fold. It means that reaction (II) is sensitive to the state of metal copper and,
hence, sensitive to the composition and structure of
oxides-precursors.
Fig. 6 shows the selectivity of methyl formate generation versus methanol conversion. In the region of
low conversion values, X ≤ 0.1, the selectivity for all
studied catalysts are close to unity. In this region, the
methanol dehydrogenation is represented mainly by
reaction (I) proceeding far from its equilibrium. The
catalysts’ activities in reaction (II) are not high enough
to exert a considerable negative effect on selectivity
in this range of X values. As the conversion degree
increases, the selectivities decrease, and their values
diverge for different catalysts first gradually and then,
in the X range from 0.3 to 0.55, very sharply. In this
range, reaction (I) approaches its equilibrium, while
the methyl formate concentration, and hence the rate
of its conversion, attain the maximum values. One can
see from Fig. 6 that at X = 0.3 the selectivity for all
the catalysts is 0.9 and higher; at X = 0.45 it differs
significantly in the sequence CZS-0.13-2, CZS-0.13-1,
Cu-Cr and CS-0.14 and is equal 0.8, 0.7, 0.7 and 0.5,
correspondingly; at X = 0.5 the selectivity is equal,
0.7, 0.3, 0.3 and 0.2, correspondingly. In the region of
Fig. 6. Methyl formate selectivity vs. methanol conversion at
473 K: ( ) for the CS-0.14 catalyst, (䊏) for the Cu-Cr catalyst,
(䉱) for the CZS-0.13-1 catalyst and (䊊) for the CZS-0.13-2
catalyst.
T.P. Minyukova et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 237 (2002) 171–180
methanol conversion 0.2 ≤ X ≤ 0.55, the catalyst selectivity may be compared by the ratio of catalyst activities in successive reactions, W1 /W2 , with its values
for the studied reactions listed in Table 2.
Indeed, as the X value is increasing the range
of 0.2 ≤ X ≤ 0.55, the decrease of the selectivity to methyl formate for CZS-0.13-2 catalyst (with
W1 /W2 = 20.4) is not so dramatic as for the other catalysts. The most sharp decrease of the selectivity takes
place for CS-0.14 catalysts having W1 /W2 = 2.3. In
the X > 0.55 region, where reaction (I) is close to
its equilibrium, shifting with the X increase, the selectivities are low and practically independent on the
catalyst properties. The methyl formate concentration
in this region agrees satisfactorily with the expression
for the equilibrium constant of reaction (I) at the concentrations of methanol and hydrogen varying due to
occurrence of reaction (II). In this case, the selectivity
is determined by a degree of methanol conversion.
Consider the dependence of metal copper activity in
the reaction of methyl formate conversion to CO and
H2 on the structure of oxide-precursor. The CS-0.14
sample was shown to be the most active in reaction (II)
and, hence, the least selective in methyl formate generation. After activation with hydrogen, the catalyst
constitutes silicon oxide, with metal copper distributed
over its surface as particles of size 30–50 Å and regular spherical shape. Copper chromite (Cu-Cr sample)
exhibits a lower activity in reaction (II) and a higher
selectivity in methyl formate generation. As a result
of sample activation with hydrogen, metal copper
forms as plane particles of size 50 Å × 100 Å × 100 Å,
linked epitaxially with the spinel surface. Evidently,
the interaction of copper particles with the surface
of reduced chromite is stronger than the interaction
of copper particles with the surface of silicon oxide.
This may lead to a decrease in the rate of reaction (II), probably, due to the decreasing strength of
methyl formate adsorption. For Zincsilite, the particle
shape was not studied, but copper ions in Zincsilite
are known to occupy two structural positions (in the
‘interlayer’ and in the ‘layer’) being reduced at various temperatures. At 543 K, copper ions from the
‘interlayer’ are reduced, and the CZS-0.13-1 catalyst
shows an activity in reaction (II) close to that of
copper chromite. In addition, at 653 K (CZS-0.13-2
catalyst), copper ions from the ‘layer’ are reduced.
This considerably decreases the activity in reaction
179
(II) and, hence, considerably increases the methyl
formate selectivity: the W1 /W2 ratio for CZS-0.13-1
catalyst is ∼7, while for the CZS-0.13-2 catalyst it is
∼20. To explain this result, it should be assumed that
copper particles, formed from the ‘interlayer’ copper
ions, change their properties as a result of activation at
a higher temperature. For example, one may assume
that copper atoms formed by the reduction of copper
ions from the Zincsilite ‘layer’ crystallize mainly at
the copper particles emerged after reduction of copper
ions from the ‘interlayer’, so that the copper surface area does not increase (Table 1). The observed
decrease in specific activity in reaction (II) may be
explained by a partial decoration of copper particles,
probably, with Si–Ox clusters. The decoration indicates a strong interaction of metal particles with the
Zincsilite surface (strong metal–support interaction
(SMSI)), which may change the electronic properties
of copper, and hence, its catalytic properties.
Thus, we are inclined to assume that the selectivity
of methyl formate generation depends on the strength
of the interaction between metal copper particles and
the catalyst oxide surface due to the interaction effect
on the catalyst activity in reaction (II). The character
of the metal particle interaction with the oxide surface
of reduced catalysts depends on the composition and
structure of the oxide-precursor. Note that in [7,8], in
the region of much higher dispersity of metal copper as
compared to the catalysts studied in the present work,
the structural sensitivity of methanol dehydrogenation
to methyl formate was observed over copper-silicon
catalysts, obtained by ion exchange.
4. Conclusions
1. Methanol dehydrogenation using copper-containing
catalysts of various nature, namely, copper chromite with the structure of tetragonally distorted
spinel, copper hydrosilicate of Chrysocolla structure, and copper-zinc hydroxysilicate of Zincsilite
structure, proceeds only after activation with hydrogen, which results in the formation of metal
copper of various dispersity and morphology at
the oxide surface.
2. Dehydrogenation of methanol over the studied catalysts proceeds via successive reactions:
(I) 2CH3 OH = CH3 OOCH + 2H2 and (II)
180
T.P. Minyukova et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 237 (2002) 171–180
CH3 OOCH = 2CO + 2H2 . No simultaneous reaction of direct dehydrogenation of methanol to CO
and H2 is observed.
3. In the region of low methanol conversion, X ≤ 0.1,
where the dehydrogenation process is represented
mainly by reaction (I), occurring far from its equilibrium, the methyl formate selectivity for all the
catalysts studied were close to 1.0. At 0.2 ≤ X ≤
0.55, the selectivity decrease with increasing conversion, and the catalyst activity ratio in successive
reactions may serve as their comparative characteristic. At high conversion values, when reaction (I)
is close to its equilibrium, the selectivity is independent of catalyst properties studied and depends
only on the methanol conversion.
4. Reaction (I) shows low sensitivity to the state
of metal copper in reduced catalysts and, hence,
low sensitivity to the composition and structure
of oxides-precursors. The catalysts’ activity in reaction (II) greatly depends on the state of metal
copper in the catalysts.
5. It was assumed that the catalyst activity in methyl
formate conversion to CO and H2 and, hence, the
selectivity of methanol dehydrogenation with respect to methyl formate generation in the region
of moderate methanol conversion depend on the
strength of the interaction between metal copper
particles and the catalyst oxide surface, which is
determined by the composition and structure of the
oxide-precursor.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to G.N. Kustova, L.M.
Plyasova, and V.I. Zaykovskii for structural and spectroscopic studies of the catalysts.
References
[1] L. Shlegel, D. Gutshik, A.Ya. Rozovskii, Kinet. Katal. 31 (4)
(1990) 1000 (in Russian).
[2] S.V. Gorshkov, G.I. Lin, A.Ya. Rozovskii, Kinet. Katal. 40 (3)
(1999) 334.
[3] D.R. Stull, E.F. Westrum, G.C. Sinke, The Chemical Thermodynamics of Organic Compounds, Wiley, New York, 1969,
pp. 450, 643.
[4] J.S. Lee, J.C. Kim, Y.G. Kim, Appl. Catal. 57 (1990) 1.
[5] T. Sodesawa, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 24 (3/4) (1984)
259.
[6] T. Sodesawa, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 32 (1) (1986) 63.
[7] T. Sodesawa, M. Nagacho, A. Onodera, F. Nozaki, J. Catal.
102 (1986) 460.
[8] E.D. Guerreiro, O.F. Gorriz, G. Larsen, L.A. Arrua, Appl.
Catal. A: Gen. 204 (2000) 33.
[9] A.L. Lapidus, S.N. Antonyuk, V.D. Kapkin, I.A. Bruk, S.D.
Sominskii, N.S. Nechuro, Neftechim 25 (1985) 761 (in
Russian).
[10] Y. Wang, R. Gang, S. Han, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 67 (2)
(1999) 305.
[11] S. Sato, M. Iijima, T. Nakayama, T. Sodesawa, F. Nozaki, J.
Catal. 169 (1997) 447.
[12] L.M. Plyasova, L.P. Solovyeva, T.A. Kriger, O.V. Makarova,
T.M. Yurieva, Kinet. Katal. 37 (4) (1996) 584 (English).
[13] T.M. Yurieva, L.M. Plyasova, O.V. Makarova, T.A. Krieger,
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 113 (1996) 427.
[14] T.M. Yurieva, G.N. Kustova, T.P. Minyukova, E.K. Poels, A.
Bliek, M.P. Demeshkina, L.M. Plyasova, T.A. Krieger, V.I.
Zaikovskii, Mat. Res. Innov. 5 (1) (2001) 3.
[15] T.M. Yurieva, T.P. Minyukova, G.N. Kustova, L.M. Plyasova,
T.A. Krieger, M.P. Demeshkina, V.I. Zaikovskii, V.V.
Malakhov, L.S. Dovlitova, Mat. Res. Innov. 5 (2) (2001) 74–
80.
[16] C.J.G. Van Der Grift, P.A. Elberse, A. Mulder, J.W. Geus,
Appl. Catal. 59 (1990) 275.
[17] J.J.F. Scholten, J.A. Konvalinka, Trans. Faraday Soc. 65
(1969) 2465.
[18] S. Sato, R. Takahashi, T. Sodesawa, K. Yuma, Y. Obata, J.
Catal. 196 (2000) 195.
[19] J.W. Evans, P.S. Casey, M.S. Wainwright, D.L. Trimm, N.W.
Cant, Appl. Catal. 7 (1983) 75.
[20] Minerals, Issue 2, Vol. IV, The Layered Silicates, Nauka,
Moscow, 1992 (in Russian) 101.
[21] V.M. Ust’yantsev, V.P. Mar’evich, Izv. Akad. Nauk Neorg.
Mater. 9 (2) (1973) 336 (in Russian).
[22] E.E. Rachkovskii, G.K. Boreskov, Kinet. Katal. 9 (4) (1970)
1249 (in Russian).
[23] M. Boudart, in: Proceedings of the Boreskov Conference
on Catalysis on the Eve of the XXI Century: Science and
Engineering, Memorial G.K., Abstracts, Novosibirsk, 1997,
Part 1, p. 5.