Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Chemico-Biological Interactions 173 (2008) 115–121
Immune up regulatory response of a non-caloric
natural sweetener, stevioside
Irum Sehar a,∗ , Anpurna Kaul a , Sarang Bani b ,
Harish Chandra Pal a , Ajit Kumar Saxena a
a
Pharmacology Division, Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (CSIR), Canal Road, 180001 Jammu, India
b Cell Biology Laboratory, Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (CSIR), Jammu, India
Received 18 October 2007; received in revised form 11 January 2008; accepted 14 January 2008
Available online 31 January 2008
Abstract
Immunomodulation is a process, which alters the immune system of an organism by interfering with its functions. This interference
results in either immunostimulation or immunosuppression. An immunomodulator is any substance that helps to regulate the
immune system. This “regulation” is a normalization process, so that an immunomodulator helps to optimise immune response.
Immunomodulators are becoming very popular in the worldwide natural health industry as these do not tend to boost immunity, but to
normalize it. Keeping this in view, major efforts have to be directed to modulate the immune responses, to permit effective treatment
of various ailments associated with immune system and thus the development of a safe and effective immunomodulator for clinical us.
Leaves of Stevia rebaudiana are a source of several sweet glycosides of steviol. The major glycoside, stevioside, diterpenoid
glycoside—is used in oriental countries as a food sweetener. Its medical use is also reported as a heart tonic. Besides, it is used
against obesity, hypertension, and stomach burn and to lower uric acid levels. Here in this study, stevioside was tested for its
immunomodulatory activity on different parameters of the immune system at three different doses (6.25, 12.5 and 25 mg/kg p.o.)
on normal as well as cyclophosphamide treated mice. Stevioside was found effective in increasing phagocytic activity, haemagglutination antibody titre and delayed type hypersensitivity. In parallel, stevioside substantially increase proliferation in the LPS and
Con A stimulated B and T cells, respectively. Present study, therefore, reveals that the drug holds promise as immunomodulating
agent, which acts by stimulating both humoral as well as cellular immunity and phagocytic function.
© 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Stevioside; Immunomodulatory activity; Humoral response; Cellular immunity; Phagocytosis
1. Introduction
Leaves of Stevia rebaudiana are a source of several
sweet glycosides of steviol [1]. The major glycoside,
stevioside, diterpenoid glycoside—is used in oriental
countries as a food sweetener. Other major glycosides
named rebaudioside, which is sweeter and more deli∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 191 2569000 6x241;
fax: +91 191 2569333.
E-mail address: sehar irum@yahoo.co.in (I. Sehar).
cious than stevioside, is utilised in beverages. To improve
the sweetness and the taste, modifications of sugar
moieties of both the glycosides were performed by enzymatic glycosylations and/or enzymatic trimming.
Stevioside (Fig. 1) is a sweet-tasting glycoside
occurring abundantly in the leaves of S. rebaudiana
(Compositae). It has been used popularly in Japan
and Brazil as a sugar substitute for decades. Previous study has shown that it lowered blood pressure in
spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) when administered intravenously. This study shows that intraperitoneal
0009-2797/$ – see front matter © 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2008.01.008
116
I. Sehar et al. / Chemico-Biological Interactions 173 (2008) 115–121
experimental protocols (n = 6). Animals were housed and
maintained following standard guidelines (CPCSEA,
2003). The study protocol was approved by Institutional
Animal Ethics Committee.
2.2. Test sample
Fig. 1. Structure of stevioside.
injection of stevioside 25 mg/kg also has antihypertensive effect in SHRs [2].
For hundreds of years, indigenous people (Guaranis)
native to Paraguay and Brazil have used its leaves as a
sweetener, particularly to sweeten their tea (mate), which
is very consumed among these tribes. Its medical use is
also reported as a heart tonic. Besides, it is used against
obesity, hypertension, and stomach burn and to lower
uric acid levels [3].
The first written article about it dates back to 1900. In
1931, however, it has been found that the glycosides are
the responsible constituents for the sweetening properties of its leaves [4]. Post phytochemical analyses of the
results have recorded the presence of 5–10% of stevioside, 2–4% of rebaudioside and dulco-sides. Stevioside
is the sweetest and its sweetening power was shown to
have been 300 times greater than sacarosis and accounted
for 18% of the leaf total composition.
Today, Stevia sweetener has been traded almost all
over the world and has been used to sweeten hundreds of
diabetic products, particularly soft drinks. The Japanese
are considered to be the greatest consumers. In addition to being a non-caloric sweetener, this plant has been
reported to be hyploglycemiant, hypo-tensor, diuretic
and cardiotonic. In Brazil, it has been successfully used
as the most suitable sweetener for diabetic people.
A great deal of clinical studies has validated such uses
even in the USA, where its employment is forbidden
due to the pressure and the lobbying led by the powerful industry of artificial sweeteners [5]. The present
investigation was aimed to study the immunomodulatory
activity of stevioside using reported methods in order to
justify the drug as an immunomodulator.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Animals
Balb/c mice of either sex, 10–12 weeks old, weighing 20–25 gm were randomly distributed in groups as per
Stevioside was prepared as freshly homogenized suspension in 1% (w/v) gum acacia and administered orally
daily once a day for the duration of the experiment. The
control animals were given an equivalent volume of gum
acacia vehicle. Cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg p.o.) was
used to induce immunosuppression 2 days prior to immunization with SRBC. LPS and Con A were used as
standard mitogens for in vitro lymphocyte proliferation.
2.3. Antigen
Sheep red blood cells (SRBCs) were used as antigen. Fresh sheep blood was collected aseptically from
the jugular vein of the sheep in sterile cold Alsever’s
solution. Blood was washed three times with pyrogen free sterile normal saline (0.9% NaCl w/v) and
0.2 ml of 5 × 109 SRBCs/ml were used for immunization. Animals were challenged on 6th day from the day
of immunization [6].
2.4. Effect on general behaviour and acute toxicity
The acute oral toxicity studies were carried out following OECD guidelines. Three different doses 6.25,
12.5 and 25 mg/kg body weight of test drug were administered orally to the groups of six mice. The animals were
observed for 14 days for any change in gross behavior
and mortality.
2.5. Humoral antibody (HA) titre
The method described by Nelson and Midenhall
was adopted [7]. Humoral immunity was determined
in normal as well as immunosuppressed mice. For
immunosuppression a single dose of cyclophosphamide
(200 mg/kg, p.o.) was administered on 2-day prior to
immunization (day 0). Animals were divided into groups
of six mice each. The control group received 1% gum
acacia solution only as vehicle; while animals in the
treatment groups were given the test drugs (6.25, 12.5
and 25 mg/kg, p.o.) daily for 7 days. The animals were
immunized by injecting 0.2 ml of 5 × 109 SRBC/ml suspension i.p. on 0 day. Blood samples were collected
from individual animal by retro-orbital plexus on 7th
day to obtain serum. Antibody levels were determined
I. Sehar et al. / Chemico-Biological Interactions 173 (2008) 115–121
by haemagglutination technique. The reciprocal of the
highest serum dilution of the test serum causing visible
agglutination was taken as the antibody titre.
2.6. Delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) response
The method of Doherty was followed to determine
SRBC induced DTH response in normal as well as
immunosuppressed mice [8]. Mice were immunized by
injecting 20 l of 5 × 109 SRBC/ml suspension subcutaneously into the right hind footpad. Treatment groups
received test drug (6.25, 12.5 and 25 mg/kg, p.o.) in 1%
gum acacia daily for 7 days. On 7th day, the thickness
of the right hind footpad was measured using digital
vernier caliper (0.1 mm pitch) which served as control.
The mice were then challenged by injection of same
amount of SRBCs in left hind footpad. Foot thickness
was again measured after 24 h of this challenge. The difference between the pre and post challenge foot thickness
express in mm was taken as a measure of delayed type
hypersensitivity (DTH).
2.7. Macrophage phagocytic response
2.7.1. In vitro
The method of Lehrer was adopted [9]. Peritoneal
macrophages (2 × 106 cells) allowed adhering to glass
cover slip (22 mm × 22 mm) for 90 min in CO2 incubator (37 ◦ C, 5% CO2 and 95% humidity). The cover slip
was washed gently with PBS to remove non-adherent
cells. Simultaneously heat killed Candida albicans cells
(100 ◦ C, 60 min) were opsonized for 90 min with 20%
autologous serum to promote phagocytosis. An aliquot
(100 l) of opsonized candida cells were added to the
cover slips and this mixture was allowed to incubate
for 15 min in CO2 incubator (37 ◦ C, 5% CO2 and
95% humidity). The samples were washed with PBS
and immediately evaluated microscopically. A total 100
macrophages were analyzed under microscope for C.
albicans’ ingestion. Average value was compared with
control and per cent phagocytosis was calculated.
2.7.2. In vivo
The phagocytic function of the reticuloendothelial
system was assayed in groups of six mice each by
injecting i.v. 160 mg/kg of 1.6% suspension of gelatin
stabilized carbon particles of 20–25 m. Three different doses of stevioside (6.25, 12.5 and 25 mg/kg p.o.
were administered daily for 7 days and 30 min prior
to the carbon injection. Blood samples were collected
before and at intervals varying between 2 and 90 min
after carbon injection [10]. An aliquot (10 l) of blood
117
sample was lysed with 2 ml of 0.1% acetic acid and the
transparency was determined spectrophotometrically at
675 nm (Uvikon 810, spectrophotometer, Kontron Ltd.,
Switzerland). The phagocytic index K, was calculated
by using the following equation:
K=
(ln OD1 − ln OD2 )
(t2 − t1 )
where OD1 and OD2 are the optical densities at times t2
and t1 , respectively.
2.8. Viability assay of murine spleenocytes
The viability of cells was determined by the
standard trypan blue exclusion assay. Approximately
2 × 106 cells/ml were treated with two-fold diluted concentration from 6.25 to 25 g/ml of stevioside and controls with 0.1% of ethanol for 3 days at 37 ◦ C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 . A visual count was
then made of the number of live (white) versus dead
(blue) cells using a hemocytometer following staining
by trypan blue (0.4% in normal saline – 0.9% NaCl) and
the percentage of live versus dead cells determined [11].
2.9. Lymphocyte proliferation assay
Spleen collected from the stevioside treated mice
under aseptic conditions, in PBS (PBS, Sigma), was
minced using a pair of scissors and passed through a
fine steel mesh to obtain a homogeneous cell suspension, and the erythrocytes were lysed with ammonium
chloride (0.8%, w/v). After centrifugation (380 × g at
4 ◦ C for 10 min), the pelleted cells were washed three
times in PBS, and resuspended in complete medium
[RPMI 1640 supplemented with 12 mM HEPES (pH
7.1), 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 100 IU/ml penicillin,
100 g/ml streptomycin, and 10% FCS]. Cell numbers were counted with a haemocytometer by trypan
blue dye exclusion technique. Cell viability exceeded
95%. Briefly, splenocytes were seeded into three to four
wells of a 96-well flat-bottom microtiter plate (Nunc)
at 2 × 106 cells/ml in 100 l complete medium. Suboptimal concentrations of LPS (10 g/ml) and Con A
(4 g/ml) were added to each well separately for priming B and T cells, respectively. The plates were incubated
at 37 ◦ C in a humid atmosphere with 5% CO2 . After
72 h, 50 l of MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) solution (5 mg/ml) was
added to each well and incubated for further 4 h [12].
The plates were centrifuged (1400 × g, 5 min) and the
untransformed MTT was removed carefully by pipetting 200 l of a DMSO (Sigma, USA) working solution
118
I. Sehar et al. / Chemico-Biological Interactions 173 (2008) 115–121
Table 1
Acute toxicity studies after stevioside treatment
Treatment groups
Control
Stevioside
Stevioside
Stevioside
Dose (mg/kg) p.o.
–
6.25
12.5
25
Body weight (mean ± S.E.)
Observations
Initial
Mortality
Sign of toxicity
6/0
6/0
6/0
6/0
–
–
–
–
21.66
22.00
21.41
21.91
Final
±
±
±
±
0.42
0.62
0.80
0.45
22.08
22.33
21.58
22.41
±
±
±
±
0.61
0.70
0.80
0.50
Acute toxicity study of stevioside was done by administering different doses of stevioside orally once and animals were observed for mortality.
Stevioside up to 25 mg/kg does not cause any mortality or any change in the behavior of mice. Data is represented as mean ± S.E.; (n = 6).
(192 l DMSO with 8 l 1N HCl) was added to each
well, and the absorbance was evaluated in an ELISA
reader at 570 nm after 15 min.
(P < 0.05) increase in antibody synthesis (15.38%) was
obtained with stevioside at the dose of 12.5 mg/kg, p.o.
in normal mice whereas in immunosuppressed
mice antibody titre response was insignificant
(Tables 2 and 3).
2.10. Statistical analysis
The results were expressed as mean ± S.E. and presented as fold increase/decrease values compared with
the untreated control. Experimental group were compared to the untreated and positive control group.
3.3. Delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) response
DTH response was checked by increased footpad
thickness using digital vernier caliper. Administration
of stevioside at the dose of 12.5 mg/kg, p.o. produced
significant increase of 18% in DTH response in normal
mice. In case of Cyclophosphamide treated mice, stevioside does not cause any significant change in DTH
response (Tables 4 and 5).
3. Results
3.1. Effect on general behavior and acute toxicity
A single dose of stevioside administered orally to each
group of mice did not show any change in the general
behaviour of the test animals. No mortality was observed
over a period of 14 days up to a dose of 25 mg/kg in mice
(Table 1).
3.4. Phagocytic response
3.4.1. In vitro
Stevioside was tested at three concentrations of
6.25, 12.5 and 25 g/ml against phagocytic function
of peritoneal macrophages. A significant increase of
4.92% in the phagocytosis was observed at 12.5 g/ml
(Table 6).
3.2. Humoral antibody (HA) titre
Humoral response to SRBCs was checked by
haemagglutination antibody titre. A significant
Table 2
Immunomodulatory effect of stevioside on humoral immune response in normal mice
Treatment groups
Control
Stevioside
Stevioside
Stevioside
Dose (mg/kg) p.o.
–
6.25
12.5
25
Humoral immune response
Antibody titre (mean ± S.E.)
Immunomodulatory activity %change
6.50
6.83
7.50
6.66
–
5.07 ↑
15.38↑
2.46 ↑
±
±
±
±
0.11
0.24
0.22*
0.19
Effect of stevioside on humoral response by antibody titre assay on normal mice. Groups of Balb/c mice (n = 6) were immunized intraperitoneally
with 200 ml of 5 × 109 SRBCs/ml alone or associated with three different doses of stevioside. Serum antibody titre was determined after 7 days
by heamagglutination technique. Reciprocal of highest dilution of the test serum causing visible agglutination was taken as antibody titre and
percent change was calculated. A significant change (P < 0.05) in antibody titre was observed only at 12.5 mg/kg p.o. dose. Data is represented as
mean ± S.E; (n = 6).
* (P < 0.05) = significant.
119
I. Sehar et al. / Chemico-Biological Interactions 173 (2008) 115–121
Table 3
Immunomodulatory effect of stevioside on humoral immune response in immunesuppressed mice
Treatment groups
Dose (mg/kg) p.o.
Control
Cyclophosphamide
Stevioside
Stevioside
Stevioside
Humoral immune response
Antibody titre (mean ± S.E.)
Immunomodulatory activity %change
6.16
4.50
5.83
6.00
5.50
–
27 ↓
81 ↑
91 ↑
61 ↑
–
200
6.25
12.5
25
±
±
±
±
±
0.29
0.17*
0.35
0.32
0.47
Effect of stevioside on humoral response by antibody titre assay on immunosuppressed mice. Groups of Balb/c mice (n = 6) were treated with a single
dose of cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg p.o) to induce significant immunosuppression 2 days prior to sensitization with 200 ml of 5 × 109 SRBCs/ml.
Antibody titre was determined after 7 days treatment with different doses of stevioside. Maximum stimulatory response was observed at 12.5 mg/kg
p.o. dose of stevioside. Data is represented as mean ± S.E; (n = 6).
* (P < 0.05) = significant.
Table 4
Immunomodulatory effect of stevioside on cell mediated immune response (DTH response) in normal mice
Treatment groups
Control
Stevioside
Stevioside
Stevioside
Dose (mg/kg) p.o.
–
6.25
12.5
25
Cell mediated immune (DTH) response
Foot thickness (in mm after 24 h) (mean ± S.E.)
Immunomodulatory activity %change
0.85
0.93
1.00
0.90
–
9.41 ↑
18.00 ↑
5.88 ↑
±
±
±
±
0.02
0.03
0.05*
0.02
Cell mediated immune response (DTH) was determined in SRBC immunized normal mice treated with different doses of stevioside. On day 7th
mice were challenged with antigen. The difference between the pre and post challenge foot thickness (in mm) after 24 h was taken as a measure
of DTH and percent DTH response was calculated. Only 12.5 mg/kg p.o. dose of stevioside was able to exhibit significant (P < 0.05) cell mediated
immune response. Data is represented as mean ± S.E.; (n = 6).
* (P < 0.05) = significant.
Table 5
Immunomodulatory effect of stevioside on cell mediated immune response (DTH response) in immune suppressed mice
Treatment groups
Control
Cyclophosphamide
Stevioside
Stevioside
Stevioside
Dose (mg/kg) p.o.
–
200
6.25
12.5
25
Cell mediated immune (DTH) response
Foot thickness (in mm after 24 h) (mean ± S.E.)
Immunomodulatory activity %change
1.03
0.60
0.96
1.01
0.92
–
42 ↓
83 ↑
95 ↑
75 ↑
±
±
±
±
±
0.05
0.05*
0.09
0.09
0.04
Delayed type hypersensitivity response on immunosuppressed mice was assessed in cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg p.o two days prior to immunization) treated mice. DTH response was measured in terms of footpad thickness of mice 24 h after being challenged with SRBC. Data is represented
as mean ± S.E.; (n = 6)
* (P < 0.05) = significant.
3.4.2. In vivo
Stevioside possess macrophage stimulatory activity as evidenced by increased phagocytic index in
carbon clearance test. The phagocytic activity of reticuloendothelial is generally measured by the rate of
removal of carbon particles from blood stream. The
significant percent phagocytic index for stevioside at
the dose of 12.5 mg/kg, p.o was found to be 6.5
(Table 6).
3.5. Effect of stevioside on the viability of splenic
lymphocytes
Unstimulated splenic lymphocytes were cultured with various concentrations of the stevioside
(6.25–25 g/ml). Up to 25 g/ml, none of the stevioside
group induced cell death (88–92% viability, results not
included). However, at 25 g/ml, stevioside does not
rapidly affect splenic lymphocytes viability. Therefore,
120
I. Sehar et al. / Chemico-Biological Interactions 173 (2008) 115–121
Table 6
Immunomodulatory effect of stevioside on in vitro and in vivo phagocytic response of macrophages
Treatment groups and
dose (g/ml)
Percent phagocytosis (in vitro
study) (mean ± S.E.)
Treatment groups and
dose (mg/kg) p.o.
Phagocytic index (in vivo study)
(mean ± S.E.)
Control
Stevioside (6.25)
Stevioside (12.5)
Stevioside (25)
25.00 ± 1.26
26.07 ± 0.22 (4.10%) ↑
26.23 ± 0.18* (4.92%) ↑
26.18 ± 0.71 (4.72%) ↑
Control
Stevioside (6.25)
Stevioside (12.5)
Stevioside (25)
1.22 ± 0.12
1.28 ± 0.32 (4.9%) ↑
1.30 ± 0.22 * (6. 5%) ↑
1.30 ± 0.12 (6. 5%) ↑
Influence of stevioside on phagocytic activity of peritoneal macrophages in vitro and in vivo was determined. For in vitro response peritoneal
macrophages (2 × 106 cells) were incubated with C. albicans and percent phagocytic activity was determined microscopically as described in
material and methods whereas in vivo effect of stevioside on phagocytosis was determined by carbon clearance method. Graded doses of stevioside
were administered to mice for 7 consecutive days. 160 mg/kg of 1.6% suspension of gelatin stabilized carbon particles injected i.v. Blood samples
collected and lysed with 2 ml of 0.1% acetic acid and transparency determined spectrophotometrically at 675 nm. Data is represented as mean ± S.E.;
(n = 6), figures in paranthesis represents percentage change.
* (P < 0.05) = significant.
the concentrations of stevioside used in the different
experiments were adjusted between 6.25 and 25 g/ml.
on B cells. Cells grown in the absence of mitogens did
not show any proliferation.
3.6. Effect of stevioside on lymphocyte proliferation
4. Discussion
Stevioside elicited substantial increase in proliferative response in the LPS stimulated B-lymphocytes.
The increase in proliferation was observed in a dose
dependent manner, the optimal significant effect being at
the concentration of 12.5 mg/kg (Fig. 2). Similar effect
was seen on Con A primed T cell proliferation but was
insignificant while the relative effect was more apparent
Immunomodulators are biological response modifiers; exert their effects by improving host defense
mechanisms against diseases. Immune regulation is
a complex balance between regulatory and effector
cells and any imbalance in immunological mechanism
can lead to pathogenesis. Stevia’s effects and uses as
a heart tonic to normalize blood pressure levels, to
regulate heartbeat, and for other cardiopulmonary indications first were reported in rat studies. In hypertensive
rats the leaf extract increased renal plasma flow, urinary flow, and sodium excretion and filtration rate
[2]. In other research, Stevia has demonstrated antimicrobial, antibacterial, antiviral and antiyeast activity
[5]. Here in this study, immunomodulatory activity of
stevioside was explored, by evaluating its effect on
antibody titre, DTH response, phagocytic function and
lymphocyte proliferation in mice. Administration of
stevioside showed significant stimulation at the dose
level of 12.5 mg/kg, p.o. with respect to these parameters. The increase in carbon clearance index reflects
the enhancement of phagocytic function of mononuclear
macrophage and non-specific immunity. Phagocytosis
by macrophages is important against the smaller parasites and its effectiveness is markedly enhanced by
opsonization of parasite with antibodies and complement C3b leading to more rapid clearance of parasite
from blood. The antibody production of T-dependent
antigen SRBCs requires the cooperation of T- and Blymphocytes and macrophages [13]. Results obtained
during present investigation showed increased antibody
production in response to SRBCs.
Fig. 2. Influence of stevioside on proliferation of T- and Blymphocytes ex vivo. Mice were exposed to graded doses of stevioside
p.o. daily for 15 days. Control mice received the vehicle only. Splenocytes were isolated and stimulated with sub-optimal amounts of
mitogens: LPS (10 g/ml), Con A (4 g/ml) for B and T cell proliferation, respectively. Cells were incubated for 72 h and proliferation
was measured by MTT reduction assay. Both B and T cells exhibited
proliferative response with stevioside treatment but on response to B
cells was significant (P < 0.05).
I. Sehar et al. / Chemico-Biological Interactions 173 (2008) 115–121
DTH is antigen specific and the general characteristics are an influx of immune cells at the site of
injection, macrophages and basophils in mice and induction becomes apparent within 24–72 h. T cells are
required to initiate the reaction [14] and [15]. Increase in
the DTH response indicates that drug has a stimulatory
effect on lymphocytes and necessary cell types required
for the expression reaction [16]. The present investigation therefore reveals that stevioside certainly possess
immunomodulatory properties.
It has been substantiated that functional foods containing physiologically active components, either from
plant or animal sources, may improve health and
longevity. The great interest in stevia as a non-caloric,
natural sweetener has fueled many studies on it including immunomodulatory ones. The main sweet chemical,
stevioside, has been found to be an immunostimulator
as evidenced by the increase in B- and T-cell mediated
humoral and DTH response, respectively. It also has been
shown to enhance macrophage function and substantially modulate the T and B cell proliferation. Hence,
it may be concluded that oral administration of stevioside is well-tolerated and effective modality that may be
considered as an alternative or supplementary therapy.
References
[1] A.D. Kinghorn, D.D. Soejarto. Sweeteners: discovery, molecular
design, and chemoreception, in: D.E. Walters, F. Orthoefer, G.E.
DuBois (Eds.), American Chemical Society, Washington, DC,
Symp. Ser. No. 450 (1991) 14-27.
[2] P. Chan, D.Y. Xu, J.C. Liu, Y.J. Chen, B. Tomlinson, W.P. Huang,
J.T. Cheng, The effect of stevioside on blood pressure and plasma
catecholamines in spontaneously hypertensive rats, Life Sci. 63
(1998) 1679–1684.
[3] W.H. Lewis, Early uses of Stevia rebaudiana (Asteraceae) leaves
as a sweetener in Paraguay, Econ. Bot. 46 (1992) 336–337.
121
[4] M. Bridel, R. Lavielle, The sweet principle of Kaa-he-e (Stevia
rebaudiana), J. Pharm. Chim. 14 (1931) 99–154.
[5] M.S. Melis, A crude extract of stevia of normal and hypertensive
rats, Brazilian J. Med. Boil. Res. 29 (1996) 669–675.
[6] A. Kaul, S. Bani, U. Zutshi, K.A. Suri, N.K. Satti, O.P. Suri,
Immunopotentiating properties of Cryptolepis buchanani root
extract, Phytother. Res. 17 (2003) 1140–1144.
[7] D.S. Nelson, P. Midenhall, Studies on cytophilic antibodies. The
production by mice of macrophage cytophilic antibodies to sheep
erythrocytes: relationship to the production of other antibodies
and development of delayed type hypersensitivity, Aust. J. Exp.
Biol. Med. Sci. 45 (1967) 113–130.
[8] N.S. Doherty, Selective effect of immunosuppressive agents
against the delayed hypersensitivity response and humoral
response to sheep red blood cells in mice, Agents Actions 11
(1981) 237–242.
[9] R.I. Lehrer, Ingestion and destruction of Candida albicans, in:
D.O. Adams, P.J. Edelson, H. Koren (Eds.), Methods for Studying
Mono-Nuclear Phagocytes, Academic Press, New York, 1981, pp.
693–708.
[10] L. Hudson, F.C. Hay, Practical Immunology, second ed., Blackwell, London, 1980, pp. 73-92.
[11] A. Khajuria, A. Gupta, F. Malik, S. Singh, J. Singh, B.D. Gupta,
K.A. Suri, P. Sudan, V.K. Srinivas, K. Ella, G.N. Qazi, A new
vaccine adjuvant (BOS 2000) a potent enhancer mixed Th1/Th2
immune responses in mice immunized with HbsAg, Vaccine 25
(2007) 4586–4594.
[12] T. Mosmann, Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and
survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays, J.
Immunol. Methods 65 (1983) 55–63.
[13] B. Benacerraf, A hypothesis to relate the specificity of T lymphocytes and the activity of I region specific Ir genes in macrophages
and Borrower lymphocytes, J. Immunol. 120 (1978) 1809–
1832.
[14] B.H. Waksman, Cellular hypersensitivity and immunity: conceptual changes in the last decade, Cell Immunol. 42 (1979) 155–
169.
[15] L.W. Poulter, G.J. Seymour, O. Duke, G. Janossy, G. Panayi,
Immunohistological analysis of delayed-type hypersensitivity in
man, Cell Immunol. 74 (1982) 358–369.
[16] S.K. Mitra, M. Gupta, D.N.K. Sarma, Immunomodulatory effect
of IM-133, Phytother. Res. 13 (1999) 341–343.