Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
Сашо Стоицов. Пробив, изложба в Националната галерия, София, 2016 / Sasho Stoitzov. Breakthrough, exhibition at The National Gallery, Sofia, 2016 Куратор Мария Василева / Curator Maria Vassileva
Introduction to Bulgarian Contemporary Art (1982– 2015) /book review/, 2020
A book review of Vessela Nozharova's "Introduction to Bulgarian Contemporary Art (1982– 2015)"
Envison SADiS, 2021
(EN) 25 authors represent a wide range of art techniques and formal stylistic categories. The focus of the exhibition is a painting, but sculpture and artistic object or photography are also represented. The exhibition project includes a performance by action graphic artists. The whole collection is closed by media installations in cooperation with DIG gallery platform. (SK) 25 autorov predstavuje široké spektrum výtvarných techník a formálnych, štylistických kategórií. Ťažiskom výstavy je maľba, ale svoje zastúpenie tu má aj sochárska a objektová tvorba a v neposlednom rade fotografia. Súčasťou výstavného projektu je tiež performatívne vystúpenie akčných grafikov. Celú kolekciu uzatvárajú inštalácie medialistov v spolupráci s platformou DIG gallery.
Genova, Irina, 2019
Irina Genova NEW ARTISTIC PRACTICES IN THE 1990s BULGARIA Following the change of governmental regime in Bulgaria in 1989 and the amendments of the constitution, the arrangements in the artistic sphere abandoned the centralized governance model. Overcoming the isolation of artistic life in Bulgaria and connecting it with current international artistic forums and practices, became the common feature of projects emerging from various artistic circles. The Expectations The main expectations of then young artists and art critics, of those in the beginning of their creative career paths, as well as those, who had until then remained uninvolved in the former power mechanism, can be summarized as follows: • Opportunities to realize various art projects, financed by diverse sources (and not as it used to be: by the ideologically indoctrinated centralized government – state, municipal, professional, etc.) within a context of a liberal public domain arrangements; • Setting up of artistic institutions independent of the state: private galleries, artists’ associations other than the Union of Bulgarian Artists, donators and collectors, private foundations; • Establishment of new international art forums in Bulgaria to place our country on the map and the calendar of worldwide art events; • Private media, providing platform for independent art criticism. Expectations were that in result of these so desired changes, an independent arts market would be created, viable to function under the conditions of globalization. As regards artistic education, along with proposed changes of the curricula at the national academy of arts, alternatives were being discussed– private higher education institutions. To what extent and which of these expectations have been realized in the last decade of the twentieth century? In the first decade of the changes there were significant transformations of the artistic domain in Bulgaria. The artistic life model was replaced in the context of a new liberal social background. Modern art trends, popular from the international stage, were adopted and re-worked in our country. Conceptually new forms and practices of expression and influence were created. Visual artists experimented with different media, including photography and video. New thematic fields were explored. Various version of performance developed. Artists, critics and amateurs, art pieces and exhibitions travelled across the border. However, the expectations of visual artists and the wider artistic circles in our country were not satisfactorily fulfilled. Chances to stabilize the liberal aspects of the environment were missed. The opportunities for funding artistic projects were few, and philanthropists and cultivated collectors of contemporary art were almost absent. There were no large exhibition spaces either. The activity of art museums is also not normalizing as expected. No new modern art museum was established. Only few significant contemporary foreign exhibitions came to Bulgaria and the country still seemed isolated on the art map. Criticism did not have enough media space for adequate expression. Provided these circumstances, the audience had difficulties finding the way to the actual artistic forms and practices. Many young artists and critics left Bulgaria. Nevertheless, looking from a two-decade distance, now the 1990s look as if having been filled with energy and will for change. Times in which the birth of a stimulating art environment seemed possible.
Ananiev, Vitaliy; Katsaridou, Iro. This obscure object of desire: object, photography, museum and damaged churches [Этот смутный объект желания: предмет, фотография, музей и разрушенные церкви]// Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. № 2(24). 2018. С. 5-24.
On the page of Vitaly Ananiev: https://www.academia.edu/38204421/This_Obscure_Object_%D0%BEf_Desire_Object_Photography_Museum_%D0%B0nd_Damaged_Churches_Studia_Slavica_et_Balcanica_Petropolitana._2018._2_24_._P._5-24 The paper focuses on a collection of photographs recently (2016) donated to the Museum of Byzantine Culture of Thessaloniki, Greece, by Georges Kiourtzian, a Byzantine scholar associated with the College de France in Paris. The 17 mounted silver-prints date from the October Revolution of 1917 and portray the destruction by bombardments of churches and other monuments in the Kremlin, Moscow. Once part of the archive of Thomas Whittemore, the American Byzantine scholar, the photographs were discarded by the Byzantine Library in Paris, only to be collected by Georges Kiourtzian and then to find their way to the collection of the Museum of Byzantine Culture. This paper sheds light on the complicated itinerary of those photographs: from their production as documentation, to their use as propaganda material, to the Byzantine Library and their eventual discarding, and finally to their new life as museum artefacts in the Museum of Byzantine Culture. The disputed narratives of the photographs are revealed, along with challenges and potentials that reorganization and integration in this recent museum presents for unravelling contested dynamics of the collection. ******* В центре внимания статьи коллекция фотографий, относительно недавно (в 2016 г.) переданная в дар Музею византийской культуры (Салоники, Греция) Йоргисом Киурцаном, византинистом, связанным с парижским College de France. 17 фотографий, датированных периодом Октябрьской революции 1917 года, изображают разрушения, нанесенные в ходе бомбардировок церквям и другим памятникам московского Кремля. Некогда бывшие частью архива Томаса Уитмора, американского византиниста, эти фотографии были отвергнуты Византийской библиотекой в Париже, попали в коллекцию Йоргиса Киурцана и в итоге оказались в собрании Музея византийской культуры. В статье рассматривается непростая биография этих фотографий: от создания как документов к использованию в качестве инструмента пропаганды через изъятие за ненужностью из собрания Византийской библиотеки к новой жизни в качестве артефактов в Музее византийской культуры. В статье анализируются неоднозначные нарративы фотографий, а плюсы и минусы, предполагаемые их включением в музейную коллекцию, представлены через анализ конфликтной динамики развития самой коллекции. Конкретный пример анализируется в контексте общих подходов, предложенных современной гуманитарной мыслью для концептуализации предмета как элемента исторического исследования.
2008
Abstract. The article deals with the German-Bulgarian art relations in the fields of mosaics and stained glass production during the 30-th and 40-th years of the XX century, seeking to fill a gap in the investigation on the German-Bulgarian cultural relations. The paper focuses on the art production of one of the most famous German mosaics and stained glass manufacture Puhl & Wagner Gottfried Heinersdorf, particularly on its mosaics and stained glass production that nowadays decorate some of the most important public buildings in Sofia. The study is based on my investigation undertaken in the archive of the Berlinische Galerie where the completely preserved archive of the prominent Berliner workshop is kept. The aim of this paper is to report the results obtained in the analysis of visual and textual material (letters, sketches, photography) kept in the archive and to develop further the investigation of the United Workshops for Mosaics and Stained Glass Puhl & Wagner Gottfried Heinersdorf, in particular the relation between the German workshop and Bulgarian art. KEYWORDS: stained glass, mosaics, secession, expressionism, Gottfried Heinersdorff, Puhl & Wagner, Ivan Penkov, Dechko Usunov.
The text (part of the book by Irina Genova “Modern Art in Bulgaria: First Histories and Present Narratives beyond the Paradigm Modernity”, 2013) discuss critical articles by Sirak Skitnik concerning the role of the artist in the age of evolving industry. Special interest represents a growing tension between the self confidence of art as autonomous, and the forms of mass culture.
Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 2019
Fundberichte aus Österreich 60/2021, 2024
Bassano News, settembre - ottobre 2024
Natalia Sobrevilla Perea (ed.), Ayacucho, 1824. El fin del ciclo revolucionario, Lima, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2024
Journal of Neuroeducation, 2022
Italica. Vol. 73, No, 4, Pp. 580-581. , 1996
2023
Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 2010
International Journal of Power Electronics, 2011
Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2006
Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 2016
Life Science Journal