Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
My contribution to the Brill's Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy (2017)
The Libertarian Ideal
Rethinking Markets: Anarchism, Capitalism and the State2016 •
This article examines markets as structures independent of capitalist socio-economic organisation. It rethinks markets as economic tools that can be placed in radically different economic systems far removed from the normalities of capitalism. By examining how markets are shaped by five monopolies created by state intervention and artificial economies of scale that rely on massive subsidisation, I see how some of the fundamentals of capitalism, the factor markets and capital-labour relations, are reshaped in a conception of free markets that are not influenced by capitalist agency. I go on to see how the Austrian School's subject of the individual as an agent of subjective economic desires is changed when placed within structures of free, or freed, markets. The institutions of markets, the surplus value distribution and the multiple social relations that present themselves as possible under a regime of rethought markets shows this subject as instituted in a diverse economy of possibilities and existences. I then examine how, even under capitalism, such a diverse economy already exists on the peripheries and in the interstices of the modern economy.
‘Postmodern Philosophy and Market Anarchism: Allies or Enemies?’ aims to evaluate the extent to which postmodern philosophy can strengthen the case for market anarchism, as well as provide novel modes of praxis for combating power structures (including, but not limited to, the state). Examining the ideas of Foucault, Deleuze, Crenshaw, Derrida, Lyotard and Rorty amongst others, this paper represents a wide-ranging examination of how the two traditions can be mutually reinforcing, as well as why they are sometimes in conflict. Owing to the breadth of thinkers and topics covered, it is intended to be a preliminary foray into an area of research that holds promise for both market anarchists and those who subscribe to certain tenets of postmodern philosophy. The study in divided into three main chapters, each of which critically analyzes a shortcoming in market anarchist theory before exploring the ways in which postmodern philosophy may address that shortcoming. Chapter One discusses the importance of recognising non-state forms of hierarchy, whilst Chapter Two asks how market anarchists should go about judging whether any given hierarchy is acceptable. Finally, Chapter Three examines the ways in which postmodern philosophy can assist market anarchists in defending of a non-totalizing conception of society without the state.
2017 •
Despite the recent proliferation of scholarship on anarchism, very little attention has been paid to the historical and theoretical relationship between anarchism and philosophy. Seeking to fill this void, Brill’s Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy draws upon the combined expertise of several top scholars to provide a broad thematic overview of the various ways anarchism and philosophy have intersected. Each of its 18 chapters adopts a self-consciously inventive approach to its subject matter, examining anarchism’s relation to other philosophical theories and systems within the Western intellectual tradition as well as specific philosophical topics, subdisciplines and methodological tendencies.
The market is traditionally hailed as the very exemplar of a system under which people enjoy freedom, in particular the negative sort of freedom associated with liberal and libertarian thought: freedom as noninterference. But how does the market appear from the perspective of a rival conception of freedom (freedom as non-domination) that is linked with the Roman and neo-Roman tradition of republicanism? The republican conception of freedom argues for important normative constraints on property, exchange, and regulation, without supporting extremes to the effect that 'property is theft' or 'taxation is theft' or anything of that kind. It does not cast a cold eye on commerce; it merely provides an alternative view of the attractions.
Competition & Change
'Historicizing the Ideology of "the Market"', Competition & Change, 25 (2021), 5, 517-533.2021 •
ESTUDIO SDT - CAF-CITEC
ESTUDIO SECTORIAL DE LA INDUSTRIA DE SERVICIOS DIGITALES TECNOLÓGICOS2024 •
La Educacion Superior como Derecho
¿QUÉ (NO) VES CUANDO ME VES? UNIVERSIDAD: DERECHO DE LOS PUEBLOS, DERECHO DE LAS DISIDENCIAS SEXOGÉNERICAS.2022 •
2023 •
2023 •
Crystal Research and Technology
Precipitation of sparingly soluble salts in packed sandbeds in the presence of miscible and immiscible organic substances2016 •
YUMUŞAK GÜÇ VE KAMU DİPLOMASİSİ ÜZERİNE AKADEMİK ANALİZLER Türkiye ve Dünyadan Örnekler
Türkiye'nin Avrasya Eksenli Yumuşak Gücü Üzerine Bazı Tespitler2018 •
International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing
A link-adapted fragment and rate matching (FaRM) MAC protocol for wireless LANs2014 •
2018 •
Regulatory Peptides
Differences in insulin and glucagon responses during oral and intraduodenal glucose application in azothemic patients before and after hemodialysis1980 •
Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology
The Unwanted Paradoxes Of the Right to Be Forgotten