The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has made a tremendous effort to assess the costs of minimising climate change will do. Its results, recently presented in its Second Assessment Report (SAR), have to be treated with caution however, because if the cost of reducing or ...

We edited this book to share powerful ideas from some of the world's most thoughtful persons because we believe our shared destiny depends on all of us, everywhere, being engaged and doing our part.

Our human nature can be understood if we are able to see ourselves more clearly, outside of the pigeonholing of reductionism and the academic silos. We are left with humans having two natures - one as individuals and another as social creatures. Living sustainably and promoting human resilience depends upon approaches that are at once reductionist and holistic.

In the emerging realisation of the precariousness of the human condition an increasing urgency surrounds discussions of sustainability. Much of this urgency centres on attempts to find alternative paradigms for life on this planet. The dominant developmental paradigm currently assumes the centrality of modern, human-centred, market-driven, economic growth as the basis of human flourishing, marginally offset by ameliorative efforts to take the environment into account. Responses swirl through public discourse and practice. This chapter addresses two such alternative paradigms. The first is posthumanism, coming out of a critical postmodernism mixed with a new materialities discourse. The second is the Triple Bottom Line approach, much more conventional—hardly a paradigm break at all. Both these alternatives, it is argued, are fundamentally flawed. They both leave the dominant paradigm largely intact—the first because it caricatures what it is criticising and then allows a posthuman future of disassembled, fragmented, and technologized bodies/minds to become part of its contradictory alternative; the second because, in its utter pragmatism, it fails to actually challenge what should be the object of its critique: human-centred development based on the single bottom-line of profit. The essay introduces a further alternative, the Circles of Social Life approach, as one of a number of potentially viable ways of thinking through basic tensions.

The purpose of this document is to provide an outline for A Sustainable Future – Is it a Human Right?, a workshop on human rights with an Education for Sustainability (EsF) perspective for educational leaders at the LAHC Annual Conference in Mexico City in April 2013. The outline provides a rationale demonstrating how the planned activities and subsequent evaluation of the session have drawn from both the adult education and human rights theories. The Session Outline can be found in Appendix 1.

The title defines the enquiry within the paper.

In the last two years, the full report on Mitigation of Climate Change prepared by the IPCC scientists, as well as research from other centres, such as the Stockholm Resilience Centre, have consistently confirmed that we are following a trajectory of doom. Unless we veer fast in the opposite direction, the odds that we will be facing planetary catastrophes that will put at great risk the existence of life in our planet on the next twenty years are realistic and likely. Not surprisingly, we continue to see that such existential threat— the direct result of the dominant socioeconomic structures of capitalism—continue to fall on the indifferent ears of those in power, particularly in the Global North, the overwhelming precursor of the planetary rift we face. Instead, these elites persist on a narrative that makes most people think that all we need to do is to decrease our carbon dioxide emissions to address climate change (which is only one of the nine planetary boundaries that we are on the verge of or have already transgressed) without changing the consumeristic lifestyle systems required for capitalism to sustain itself. They push, explicitly and implicitly, the idea that Promethean technological prowess will solve our problems, such as the fact that we are well underway of the Sixth Mass Extinction, so that we can confidently continue to pursue our consumeristic impulses in our quest for happiness. Based on the track record delivered by the centers of power, it is evident that humans and nonhumans will surely reach our demise in the next few decades unless the common people rid themselves of the delusional and Promethean narrative advanced by the centers of power that has captured public opinion. To accomplish this, we must debunk this narrative and set the record straight. There is no possibility of future generations enjoying a sustainable and dignified life unless we radically change our culture and lifestyle habits and learn to live in harmony with our home, planet Earth. We must treat our planet with great care, as we would a friend we depend on for our lives. Hence, we must wake up, mobilise, and organise in order to force the replacement of the structures of unrelenting growth, endless consumption, and enormous inequality at the same time that we change our values and daily habits if we want to bequeath to future generations a life with dignity and joy. The great challenge is to provoke awareness and critical thinking among the common people. The market reigns supreme, transforming people into consumer units, alienating and depriving them of their dignity and making them believe that success and happiness lie in having things, so that we can consume and feel happy through instant gratification. Consequently, replacing the deeply embedded culture of consumerism that is instrumental for capitalism to sustain itself is a colossal challenge. Yet, people must become conscientious and internalise that the only way to save humans and nonhumans, and the resources required from nature for both to survive and prosper, is by drastically radically cutting consumption in order to diminish our ecological footprint, replacing our structures and steering our trajectory towards a transition of consumption degrowth until we reach a sustainable steady state of production and consumption. We must embark on a sustainable transition that is safe and just for all living things and the planet. Furthermore, because capitalism’s nature requires endless growth, the only way to accomplish this is through an ecosocial Geocratic Paradigm, or “Government by the Earth”. In this paradigm, humankind lives to take good care of its home as its friend, the planet. In Geocratia, instead of vying to possess and consume to survive, people enjoy a dignified life without all of the excesses of consumerism. In Geocratia, many basic needs, such as health care, education, and water—currently rendered as mere merchandise—are universal rights with guaranteed access to all people to live comfortably but frugally. There is no choice if we want to avoid the catastrophic trajectory of doom that we are rapidly undergoing, unless we prefer to ensure reaching our final demise in the next few decades.