Sprawozdania
archeologiczne
instytut archeologii i etnologii
polskiej akademii nauk
Sprawozdania
archeologiczne
kraków 2018
Copyright © by the Authors and Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk 2018
Editors
SŁAWOMIR KADROW, slawekkadrow@gmail.com
PIOTR WŁODARCZAK, wlodarczak.piotr@gmail.com
Editorial Secretary
ANNA RAUBA-BUKOWSKA, sprawozdania.archeologiczne@gmail.com
Editorial Committee
SYLWESTER CZOPEK, JANUSZ KRUK (CHAIRMAN) JAN MACHIK, SARUNAS MILISAUSKAS,
JOHANNES MÜLLER, JAROSLAV PEŠKA, ALEKSANDER SYTNIK, PRZEMYSŁAW URBAŃCZYK
All articles in this volume of „Sprawozdania Archeologiczne” obtained approval of the following specialists: JUSTYNA
BARON (Wrocław), ALIAKSANDR BASHKOU (Brest, Belarus), EWA BUGAJ (Poznań), LECH CZERNIAK (Gdańsk),
ALEKSANDR DIACHENKO (Kyiv, Ukraine), KAROL DZIĘGIELEWSKI (Kraków), MICHAŁ DZIK (Rzeszów), KLARÁ
PUSZTAINÉ FISCHL (Miskolc, Hungary), JACEK GÓRSKI (Kraków), ANDRZEJ JANOWSKI (Szczecin), ANDRZEJ
MICHAŁOWSKI (Poznań), ADAM NOWAK (Rzeszów), ANDRZEJ PELISIAK (Rzeszów), ANDRZEJ ROZWAŁKA
(Rzeszów), SEWERYN RZEPECKI (Łódź), ROMAN SHIROUKHOV (Schleswig, Germany), TARAS TKACHUK (Galich,
Ukraine), SELENA VITEZOVIĆ (Belgrad, Serbia), ANNA ZAKOŚCIELNA (Lublin)
English proofreading
AEDDAN SHAW (1, 2, 4, 6-8, 10, 14, 16-19), MARK TOUSSAINT (3, 9, 11-13, 15)
Technical Editor and Layout
JOANNA KULCZYŃSKA-KRUK
Centre for Mountains and Uplands Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences
Cover: Węgry, Sztum Commune. Clay spindle whorl with an imitation of writing and bridle strap
divider in the form of a circle divided by the arms of a cross. Photo. L. Okoński
Editor’s Address
CENTRE FOR MOUNTAINS AND UPLANDS ARCHAEOLOGY, INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
AND ETHNOLOGY, POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 31-016 KRAKÓW, UL. SŁAWKOWSKA 17
PL ISSN 0081-3834
DOI: 10.23858/SA70.2018
Printed by PARTNER POLIGRAFIA Andrzej Kardasz
ul. Zwycięstwa 10, 15-703 Białystok
Edition: 300 pcs.
„Sprawozdania Archeologiczne” is regulary listed in the: SCOPUS, CEJSH, ERIH Plus
Contents
Articles ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Michał Pawleta
Historical re-enactment as a new form of contemporary people’s relation to the past ................................................ 9
Michał Adamczyk, Marta chmiel-chrzanowska
Useless Stones? The Potential of Lithics in Palaeodemographic Research ................................................................... 31
Nadezhda Kotova
Revisiting the Neolithic chronology of the Dnieper steppe region with consideration of a reservoir effect
for human skeletal material ............................................................................................................................ 47
elena starkova, Anna Zakościelna
Traditions of Ceramic Production in the Central and Eastern Europe Eneo-lithic: Tripolye, Late Malice
and Lublin-Volhynian Cultures ....................................................................................................................... 67
Marie-lorraine Pipes, Janusz Kruk, sarunas Milisauskas
Neolithic Textile Production Artifacts at Bronocice ..................................................................................................... 87
Aleksandr Diachenko, Małgorzata rybicka
Świeciechów Flint and the Trans-regional Interactions of the Funnel Beaker Populations ........................................ 119
Mateusz stróżyk
Fortifications in landscape. Preferences in the location of the Early Bronze Age settlement in Bruszczewo ............ 139
Anna lasota-Kuś
A cinerary urn from site 21 in Ostrów, Przemyśl District. A contribution to studies on the meaning and role
of ornamentation of Early Roman Period ceramic vessels in the Przeworsk culture .................................. 153
tomasz Kurasiński, Kalina skóra, Viktor Gayduchik
A grain against a vampire? Some remarks on so-called anti-vampire practices in the light of archaeological
and folkloristic-ethnographic data ................................................................................................................ 173
sławomir Wadyl
Recent Developments in the Archaeology of the Pomeranian-Prussian borderland in the Early Middle Ages.
The case of the settlement complex in Węgry, northern Poland ................................................................ 203
FielD surVey AND MAteriAls ....................................................................................................................... 227
Valeska Becker, Maciej Dębiec, Andriy B. Bardetskiy
We are One: Figural finds from the eastern border of the Linear Pottery Culture distribution ............................ 227
Bernadeta Kufel-Diakowska, stanisław Wilk
Microliths from Graves of the Lublin-Volhynian at Site 2 in Książnice, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship ........................ 243
Marcin s. Przybyła, Joanna Jędrysik
A classification of objects made of bone, antler, tooth and horn from the Early Bronze Age fortified
settlement in Maszkowice ............................................................................................................................ 269
Kamil Niedziółka, Paweł szczepanik, Mikołaj lisowski
A unique find of a silver cross-shaped earring from an early medieval settlement at Szemud, site 4,
in Eastern Pomerania, Poland ....................................................................................................................... 297
Kornelia Kajda, Maksymilian Frąckowiak
Archaeological Investigation of the Microhistories of the Second World War. A Case of a Soviet Soldier’s
Grave in Western Poland ............................................................................................................................. 327
DiscussioNs AND PoleMics .......................................................................................................................... 339
Jacek Gackowski
The most recent monograph on the Kashubian barrow s in the Bronze and Iron Ages, in other words,
how some archaeologists find themselves in a post-truth world ...................................................................... 339
Michał Pawleta
Towards a new synthesis of the prehistory of Polish lands. Some remarks on “The Past Societies. Polish lands
from the first evidence of human presence to the early Middle Ages” ........................................................ 353
reVieWs AND short reVieW Notes ......................................................................................................... 375
elżbieta sieradzka
(review) P. Jarosz, J. Libera and P. Włodarczak (eds.), Schyłek neolitu na Wyżynie Lubelskiej
(The decline of the Neolithic on the Lublin Upland). Kraków 2016: Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii
Polskiej Akademii Nauk, 562 pages ............................................................................................................. 375
tomasz Bochnak
(review) H. J. M. Green, Durovigutum. Roman Godmanchester (= Archaeopress Roman Archaeology 33).
Compiled, collated and edited by Tim Malin. Oxford (2017): Archaeopress Publishing Ltd.;
xxi + 460 pages and 67 illustrations ............................................................................................................ 379
“Sprawozdania Archeologiczne” is regulary listed in the International Current Awareness Service: Anthropology. Selected material is
indexed in the International Bibliography of social and Cultural Anthropology.
Indexed in:
IBZ – International Bibliography of Periodical Literature
IBZ – CD-ROM
SPRAWOZDANIA ARCHEOLOGICZNE 70, 2018
PL ISSN 0081-3834
DOI: 10.23858/SA70.2018.012
Bernadeta Kufel-Diakowska*, stanisław Wilk**
microliths from graves
of the lublin-volhynian at site 2 in książnice,
Świętokrzyskie voivodeship
AbstrAct
Kufel-Diakowska B. and Wilk S. 2018. Microliths from Graves of the Lublin-Volhynian at Site 2 in Książnice,
Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 70, 243-268.
Trapezoidal flint microliths have been attributed to various early agricultural cultures in Central Europe.
They are found in both settlements and cemeteries. The cemetery of the Lublin-Volhynian Culture in Książnice,
Site 2, one of the two biggest necropolises of younger Danubian cultures in southern Poland, has provided the
greatest number of trapezes. Use-wear analysis has revealed the manner in which trapezes were used and has
shed some light on the reasons for the presence of these artifacts in graves. Microliths differ in terms of their
shapes, their production and usage. The location of microliths within grave pits is heterogeneous, both in relation to the human remains and to other flint artifacts. We observe a different situation at the cemetery of the
Jordanów Culture in Domasław, Site 10/11/12. Despite the fact that burial rites of both societies were similar in
many respects, the distribution and the function of trapezes from graves in Domasław is quite uniform as compared to Książnice.
Keywords: Eneolithic, Lublin-Volhynian Culture, trapezes, graves, function
Received: 04.05.2017; Revised: 21.01.2018; Accepted: 14.09.2018
* Institute of Archaeology, University of Wroclaw, Laboratory for Archaeological Conservation and Archaeometry
** Institute of Archaeology of the Jagiellonian University, Karkonoskie Museum in Jelenia Góra
244
bernadeta kufel-diakowska, stanisław wilk
IntroDuCtIon
Trapezes, which have been described by many Mesolithic researchers as a component
of Neolithic flint inventories, have been attributed to various early agricultural cultures in
Central Europe. Trapezes are discovered in large numbers in excavations of Linear Pottery
Culture settlements in Moravia and Lower Austria (Mateiciucová 2008, 91-95), and less
abundantly in Poland (Balcer 1983, 68). A sizable collection of thirty-five specimens was
found in a Jordanów culture cemetery (10/11/12) in Domasław, Kobierzyce Commune
(Kufel-Diakowska et al. 2017, 223). Trapezes also appear in excavations of Lengyel-Polgár
Culture sites (Kulczycka-Leciejewiczowa 1979, 145; Balcer 1983, 111), in the inventories of
Malice Culture burials (Kadrow 2009, 57, 59; Kadrow et al. 2009, 222, 227-229), and
more rarely in the burial complexes of the Funnel Beaker and Globular Amphora Cultures
(Wiślański 1979a, 222; Wiślański 1979b, 222, 286; Balcer 1983, 127, 217; Bronowicki et al.
2001; Zakościelna and Libera 2007, 259).
This is also true of the Lublin-Volhynian culture. Trapezoidal microliths are found in
both the settlements and cemeteries of this culture. Among the former, Anna Zakościelna
lists site 1C in Gródek, Hrubieszów Commune (3 trapezes), site 7 in Las Stocki, Końskowola
Commune (8 trapezes), site 1 in Łopatki, Wąwolnica Commune (2 trapezes), site 6 in
Wąwolnica (9 trapezes), and the Grodzisko site in Złota, Samborzec Commune (3 trapezes). Graves containing trapezes have been discovered at site 5 in Jaszczów, Milejów
Commune (4 trapezes), at sites 1 (3 chisel-ended arrowheads), 10 (1 trapeze fragment) and
26 (1 trapeze) in Strzyżów, Horodło Commune, and at site 16 in Krasne-Kolonia, Uścimów
Commune (5 trapezes), as well as the Grodzisko site in Złota, Samborzec Commune (2 trapezes) (Zakościelna 1996, 71; Zakościelna and Libera 2007, 258; Zakościelna 2010, 137-140).
Considering the overall frequency of flint artifacts deposited in Lublin-Volhynian
graves, trapezes are the most abundant group of retouched tools. Retouched blades and
other objects of this type appear in smaller quantities. This frequency is amplified by the
high number of artifacts discovered in the Świętokrzyskie region. The trapezes discovered
at the cemetery in Książnice, Pacanów Commune, which are the subject of this study, currently constitute the largest collection of artifacts of this type attributed to the LublinVolhynian Culture.
The views regarding the presence of microlithic forms in the material of the LublinVolhynian Culture have evolved over the past several decades. It was previously believed
that they were the result of contacts with Mesolithic communities. The analysis of technological and metric qualities has led to a shift in this perspective. A. Zakościelna currently
believes that trapezes were most likely manufactured locally. The technical skills required
for their production would have been acquired via Para-neolithic cultures (Zakościelna
1996, 106; Zakościelna and Libera 2007, 266).
There are also various opinions regarding the function of trapezoidal microliths. They
are most frequently associated with projectile weapons and described as tips, barbs, or
fig. 1. Książnice, site 2, Pacanów Commune. Plan of the Lublin-Volhynian Culture cemetery
fig. 4. Książnice, site 2, Pacanów Commune. The arrangement of the trapezes in the grave 4 (photo by S. Wilk)
fig. 16. Domasław 10/11/12, Kobierzyce Commune. Arrangement of trapezes in graves; 1,3,5,7 – sketches of
skeletons with locations of the trapezes (black dots); 2, 4, 6, 8 – trapezes in situ; 1-2 – grave 12987; 3-4 – grave
13109; 5-6 – grave 13132; 7-8 – grave 13352 (photo by T. Murzyński; illustration: B. Kufel-Diakowska
microliths from graves of the lublin-volhynian at site 2 in książnice…
245
projectiles, and less frequently as knife or sickle blades. In light of these functions, it is
interesting to note the fact that trapezes are frequently deposited in graves. This is noteworthy due to their practical function as well as the symbolic dimension of that utilitarian
aspect, expressed through the transfer of tools to the realm of the sacred. Use-wear analysis of microliths discovered in the Lublin-Volhynian Culture cemetery in Książnice reveals
the manner in which they were used and the reasons for the presence of these artifacts in
the graves.
sIte
The Lublin-Volhynian Culture cemetery at site 2 in Książnice (AZP 95-67: 100, Pacanów
Commune, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship) is located at the eastern end of the Pińczów
Hummock and occupies the central part of a small hill (200.15 m a.s.l.), bordered from the
south and southeast by a nameless stream, a left tributary of the river Kanał-Strumień.
Excavations ongoing since 2001 have revealed 17 graves forming two separate grave fields
located less than twenty meters apart (Fig. 1). The eastern field contains eight burials of
members of the local elite. The western field contains eight poorer burials. Grave 17, located between the two fields, may have served as the central burial around which the entire
cemetery was founded. Excavations of the cemetery additionally revealed traces of four
destroyed graves, from which only a few vessels remained.
In the light of radiocarbon dating, the cemetery at site 2 in Książnice functioned from
the turn of the 5th and 4th millennia into the early part of the 4th millennium BC, most
probably between 4030-3830 BC (Wilk 2016, 21).
Graves WIth mICrolIths
The trapezes found in the grave pits are highly diverse both in terms of their location
and their frequency. Each grave containing specimens that are of interest to us therefore
warrants a separate description. Burial nos. 1, 4-5, 14-15 and 17, which have already been
published, are described in a general way. Burial nos. 12 and 13, which were not a subject
of previous publications, are described in detail. One of the analyzed artifacts was found in
an empty space between the eastern and western grave fields.
G rave 1. The grave pit contained a small amount of highly damaged human remains,
including parts of long bones, which indicated a burial in a crouched position on the right
side (skeletal analysis unavailable) (Fig. 2). The grave inventory comprised three pottery
vessels, discovered in the northeastern part of the pit, and 10 chocolate flint specimens
(three blades – two complete and one partial), three blade-like flakes, and two trapezes.
Unfortunately, in the case of the burial in question, accurate information regarding the
location of flints within the grave pit – including the trapezes that are the subject of this
analysis – is unavailable (Wilk 2004, 225, 227).
246
bernadeta kufel-diakowska, stanisław wilk
fig. 2. Książnice, site 2, Pacanów Commune. Grave 1 (illustration: s. Wilk)
microliths from graves of the lublin-volhynian at site 2 in książnice…
247
fig. 3. Książnice, site 2, Pacanów Commune. Grave 4 (illustration: s. Wilk)
G rave 4 . The fully preserved skeleton of a maturus male, aged approximately 50
years, was discovered in a crouched position, buried on the right side with the skull pointing
south (Fig. 3). The rich grave inventory comprised three pottery vessels, a copper chisel and
18 flint objects. Two of them (a chocolate flint blade and a Świeciechów flint blade) lay near
to the proximal end of the right femur, while the semi-circularly arranged assemblage of
16 chocolate flint microliths (12 trapezes and 4 Sośnia arrowheads) was found in the northwestern corner (Fig. 4) (Wilk 2004, 232).
Such trapeze arrangements were previously suggested to have been the remains of
a composite tool deposited in the grave, e.g. a sickle with an organic hafting that had not
been preserved, or a sheaf of arrows that had been shifted slightly by post-depositional
processes (Zakościelna and Libera 2007, 260). Initial use-wear observations conducted by
Natalia N. Skakun have excluded the possibility that the specimen had been a harvesting
248
bernadeta kufel-diakowska, stanisław wilk
fig. 5. Książnice, site 2, Pacanów Commune. Grave 5 (illustration: s. Wilk)
microliths from graves of the lublin-volhynian at site 2 in książnice…
249
fig. 6. Książnice, site 2, Pacanów Commune. Grave 6 (illustration: s. Wilk)
tool. Rather, the microwear found on two of the artifacts indicated a tool used for cutting
soft materials such as meat, hence the supposition that trapezes may have served as the
blades of a tool employed in the burial ritual and manufactured right before being deposited in the grave (Wilk 2004, 237).
Importantly, the retouched edges of two of the specimens are rounded, indicating contact with a softer material, though they lack any microscopic linear impact polish that
would indicate a parallel motion. These traces are more likely to be associated with storage
or transportation in a leather bag. Numerous fractures were noted on nine of the trapezes,
including crescent-shaped negative scars on the shorter, unretouched edges of six specimens. Less numerous, yet equally characteristic fractures, appeared on the longer edges and
corners of the trapezes. Six specimens display no use-wear traces. It should therefore be assumed that the deceased was buried with a sheaf of arrows, most likely contained in a quiver.
G rave 5. The fully preserved skeleton of a senilis male, aged approximately 55-60
years, lay on the right side and partially on the back in a crouched position, with the skull
pointing south (Fig. 5). The inventory of the grave comprised three pottery vessels, a small
copper axe (of the Felsőgalla type, or a transitional type between Hajdúszoboszló and
250
bernadeta kufel-diakowska, stanisław wilk
fig. 7. Książnice, site 2, Pacanów Commune. Grave 12 (illustration: s. Wilk)
Sakalhat) and 16 flint objects, the majority of which (3 whole chocolate flint blades and 1
partial blade, 1 Volhynian flint blade; 1 blade-like flake, 3 endscrapers – two on blades and
1 on a retouched blade – and a truncated blade made of chocolate flint) lay in two clusters
adjacent to the left ilium; the retouched blade made of Volhynian flint lay on the ribs of the
upper part of the chest, beneath the left shoulder, while the trapeze made of chocolate flint
(Ks/k/5/04) was found at the junction of the right fibula and the left tibia.
microliths from graves of the lublin-volhynian at site 2 in książnice…
251
G rave 6 . The cenotaph. The grave did not contain a skeleton; only animal bones belonging to a goat or sheep were found. The grave inventory consisted of eight pottery vessels uncovered in three clusters located in the northern, central, and southern parts of the
grave pit (Fig. 6). A polishing stone was found in one of the vessels. A trapeze made of
chocolate flint was uncovered at a depth of 199.89 m a.s.l. in the vicinity of feature 4/04,
had damaged grave 6 during construction (Wilk 2006, 249).
G rave 12. The grave pit was rectangular in shape and elongated north-south, 225 ×
105 cm in dimension, and had indistinct edges at the level excavated (Fig. 7). A small
quantity of poorly preserved fragments of human bone were found at a depth of 40-45 cm,
fig. 8. Książnice, site 2, Pacanów Commune. Grave 13 (illustration: s. Wilk)
252
bernadeta kufel-diakowska, stanisław wilk
fig. 9. Książnice, site 2, Pacanów Commune. Grave 14 (illustration: s. Wilk)
situated in the southern part of the grave. These included the remains of the skull and
teeth of a maturus individual, as well as long-bone fragments showing that the deceased
had been buried on the right side in a crouched position. The inventory consisted of four
pottery vessels deposited in the southern and southeastern parts of the grave, along with
eight flint artifacts, of which five (a double truncated blade formed by grooved retouch,
two blades, one trapeze made of chocolate flint and a dihedral burin made of Świeciechów
flint) were situated at a depth of 199.78-199.66 m a.s.l. in a cluster in the central part of the
pit, nearer to its western edge. The two remaining trapezes were found at a depth of 199.67199.70 m a.s.l. in the northwestern part of the feature.
microliths from graves of the lublin-volhynian at site 2 in książnice…
253
G rave 13. The grave pit had indistinct edges at the level excavated and was rectangular in shape (185 × 100 cm), oriented along a northeast-southwest axis (Fig. 8). Human
teeth were found at a depth of 30-40 cm in the southern part of the grave pit, while the
center contained very fine bone fragments belonging to a iuvenis individual. The inventory
consists of two pottery vessels uncovered in the southeastern corner of the grave pit and
six flint artifacts, of which a truncated blade and a chocolate flint blade were located in the
southern part, while a chocolate flint flake and a truncated burin were found in the southeastern area of the grave. Beyond the edge of the grave pit, approximately 50 cm north of
its northern edge, a trapeze made of chocolate flint was found at a depth of 199.57 m a.s.l.
G rave 14 . Cremation burial. In the southern part of the grave, a concentration of
burnt human bones belonging to a maturus individual was uncovered. The inventory consisted of two vessels and twelve flint objects. In the southern part of the grave, two blades
fig. 10. Książnice, site. 2, Pacanów Commune. Grave 15 (illustration: s. Wilk)
254
bernadeta kufel-diakowska, stanisław wilk
fig. 11. Książnice, site 2, Pacanów Commune. Grave 17 (illustration: s. Wilk)
microliths from graves of the lublin-volhynian at site 2 in książnice…
255
with retouched notches and a blade made of chocolate flint were uncovered, while a small
core made of erratic flint was found next to a miniature pot (Fig. 9). The remaining flint
artifacts (a burin spall made of Świeciechów flint, a retouched flake, a blade-like flake and
a blade fragment, all made of chocolate flint) were found in the northern part of the pit.
The only Sośnia arrowhead made of chocolate flint found in the assemblage lay at the
western edge of the grave (Wilk and Szczepanek 2017, 356).
G rave 15. The grave pit contained a very poorly preserved skeleton lacking a skull,
arranged on the right side in a crouched position with the lower limbs pointing north (skeletal analysis unavailable) (Fig. 10). Four objects made of chocolate flint were found in the
vicinity of the burial: two heavily used and worn retouched blades – one at chest level, the
other at the level of the deceased’s pelvis – a fragment of a small blade in the northeastern
corner of the pit, and a trapeze found between the retouched blades at a depth of 199.64 m
a.s.l. (Wilk and Kufel-Diakowska 2016, 155).
G rave 17. The grave pit contained an incomplete, poorly preserved skeleton of an
adultus individual. The grave inventory consisted of three pottery vessels, a copper earring, and six artifacts made of chocolate flint (Fig. 11). The flints were located at chest level
(the retouched blade and both trapezes), at the level of the pelvis (a Las Stocki-type truncated blade), and in the southwestern part of the grave (two flakes) (Wilk and KufelDiakowska 2016, 155).
materIals
A total of 30 trapezoidal microliths were discovered within the cemetery, including 5
Sośnia arrowheads (Table 1; Fig. 12). Twenty-two trapezes and all of the Sośnia arrowheads were recovered from seven graves, while one trapeze (Ks/k/5/05) was found in the
empty space between the eastern and western group of graves (about 2.4 m east of grave
17, 5.3 m south of feature 2/01, and 6.3 m west of grave 1), and two other trapezes were
discovered outside – but immediately adjacent to – the graves, from which it can be surmised that these artifacts were associated with particular burials. Specimen Ks/k/29/04
was recovered from the vicinity of feature 4/04, around 0.6 m west of the damaged western
edge of grave 6, while trapeze Ks/k/20/12 was discovered around 0.5 m north of the northern
edge of grave 13.
The trapezes uncovered in Książnice are both high and low forms, featuring steep and
semi-steep retouch, some with very oblique truncation, with the exception of one specimen recovered from grave 4, which does not have a retouched opposing edge. The Sośnia
arrowheads, with flat and semi-flat retouch extending onto the dorsal aspect, represent
a separate form. All of the specimens were produced from chocolate flint. They are in very
good condition and bear no signs of heat treating, patina, or post-depositional damage.
256
table 1. Książnice, site 2, Busko Zdrój distr. microwear on microliths from lublin-volhynian graves
bernadeta kufel-diakowska, stanisław wilk
microliths from graves of the lublin-volhynian at site 2 in książnice…
257
bernadeta kufel-diakowska, stanisław wilk
table 1.
258
microliths from graves of the lublin-volhynian at site 2 in książnice…
259
fig. 12. Książnice, site 2, Pacanów Commune. trapezes: 1-2 – grave 1; 3-18 – grave 4; 19-20 – grave 5;
21 – grave 6; 22-24 – grave 12; 25 – grave 13; 26 – grave 14; 27 – grave 15; 28-29 – grave 17; 30 – loose
find (illustration: a. Zakościelna, m. szeliga, J. libera, B. Kufel-Diakowska, s. Wilk)
260
bernadeta kufel-diakowska, stanisław wilk
mICroWear on the traPeZes
Microscopic analysis of trapezoidal microliths from the Middle and Late Stone Age,
supported by the results of experimental research, reveals that they were primarily used to
arm arrows. The types and amount of wear varies depending on the manner in which the
arrow was armed. Compared to other inserts, including ones made of microliths, trapezes
fastened transversally onto the tips of shafts, i.e. with the shorter edge facing forward, and
rarely display the sort of use-wear typical of projectiles, (cf. Fisher et al. 1984; Yaroshevich
et al. 2010, 82; Pyżewicz 2012, 99). When such use-wear is present, it is usually fractures
of the longer edge, including crescent-shape snap fractures (Gibaja and Palomo 2004, 8789; Lammers-Keijsers et al. 2014, 461), individual minor scars (Gibaja and Palomo 2004,
87-89; Pyżewicz 2013, 34), or minor but continuous retouch scars (Gibaja and Palomo
2004, 87-89), as well as small negative scars in the corners of the projectiles (Yaroshevich
2012, 8). Crescent-shaped snap fractures have also been observed in the hafting area of the
trapezes, which is on their shorter edges (Pyżewicz 2013, 34). In the case of trapezes
mounted obliquely on the tips of the shaft or hafted as barbs, cone fractures and pseudoburin fractures occurred on the protruding angles (Nuzhnyĭ 1990, 115-117; Korobkowa
1999, 102-103; Gibaja and Palomo 2004, 87-89; Yaroshevich 2012, 8).
Another type of microwear observed on trapezes is heavy rounding of the corners
formed by the longer and the retouched edge. These traces bear no features that would
indicate a particular working direction, while their visual appearance suggests contact
with hide – hence the conclusion that this type of microwear is the result of the transportation of arrows in a quiver (e.g. Márquez et al. 2008, 324; Winiarska-Kabacińska 2008,
334; Kufel-Diakowska et al. 2017, 232, 236-237) or of the inserts themselves in a leather
container (Pyżewicz 2012, 101-102).
There are also traces characteristic of meat cutting found on the longer edges of the
specimens. These manifest as a rounding of the working edge, with poorly developed, greasy
polish, oriented linearly and marked by delicate striae (Osipowicz 2010, 228). Hide-perforation traces have also been observed (Korobkowa 1999, s. 86). Galina F. Korobkowa cites the
example of a markedly worn trapeze with one heavily rounded and slightly polished corner. These traces are accompanied by short and delicate yet numerous striae. Other forms
of wear appear less frequently, including the abrasion of the surfaces of trapezes, observed
by Annelou van Gijn (2014, 699) on artifacts discovered in Funnel Beaker Culture graves.
Use-wear analysis of the trapezes found in Książnice was carried out at the Laboratory
for Archaeological Conservation and Archaeometry at the Institute of Archaeology,
University of Wrocław, using an Olympus SZX9 stereomicroscope (up to 114×) and a Nikon
ECLIPSE LV100 metallographic microscope (50-500×). The microwear can be grouped
into three general categories (Table 1).
The first category consists of fractures on the unretouched, longer, or shorter edges,
and fractures on one of the corners formed by the longer and unretouched edges of the
microliths from graves of the lublin-volhynian at site 2 in książnice…
261
fig. 13. Książnice, site. 2, Pacanów Commune. use-wear traces on trapezes: 1 – Ks/k/23/14 (grave 17);
2 – Ks/k/1/1/01 (grave 1); 3-4 – Ks/k/4/9/03 (grave 1); 5-6 – Ks/k/9/9/03 (grave 1). the line represents
the extent of the microstructure, and the rectangular space shown in the photograph
(photo by B. Kufel-Diakowska)
262
bernadeta kufel-diakowska, stanisław wilk
fig. 14. Książnice, site 2, Pacanów Commune. use-wear traces on the trapezes: 1-2 – Ks/k/22/14 (grave
17); 3 – Ks/k/28/12 (grave 12); 4 – Ks/k/20/12 (grave 13); 5-6 – Ks/k/44/12 (grave 14). the line represents the extent of the microstructure, and the rectangular space shown in the photograph
(photo by B. Kufel-Diakowska)
microliths from graves of the lublin-volhynian at site 2 in książnice…
263
fig. 15. Książnice, site 2, Pacanów Commune. use-wear traces on the trapezes: 1-2 – Ks/k/5/05 (loose
find). the line represents the extent of the microstructure, and the rectangular space shown in the photograph (photo by B. Kufel-Diakowska)
trapeze. The longer edge was damaged in four specimens, with fractures in the form of
micronotches and crescents. Fractures of the shorter edge are features of eight trapezes; in
seven instances these are crescent-shaped snap fractures. Five specimens have fractured
corners. The negative scars are cone fractures and, in one case, a burin-like fracture. The
damage on the longer edges as well as the corners of the trapezes are very fine fractures,
and thus it is impossible to unambiguously determine the function of these artifacts. Only
in one instance was the microscopic linear impact polish typical of launched arrows observed (Fig. 13:1). The fracturing of the shorter edges may be associated with the hafting,
as indicated by experiments conducted by Katarzyna Pyżewicz (2013, 34). Assuming that
all of the damage described above is associated with projectile weapons, then two modes
of hafting would be involved: one with the trapezes fastened transversally onto the tips of
the shafts, and the other obliquely.
The other category of microwear includes the aforementioned rounding of part of one
or both retouched edges. This feature was observed on five trapezes. In some instances,
slight rounding occurs on the corners and even on part of the unretouched edge (Fig. 13:26). As mentioned above, traces of this type on the edges of trapezes may be the result of the
manner in which the arrows or the inserts themselves were transported or stored.
The final and highly complex category of use-wear comprises significant rounding of
the corners of the longer and retouched edge – including a minor portion of the truncation – greasy or matte polish in the area of the rounding, and numerous short and shallow
striae beginning in the corner and oriented obliquely to the edge (Fig. 14:1-2). This type of
damage was observed on five trapezes. These traces were produced as a result of working
hide, meat, or both. Individual trapezes differ in terms of the details of the microwear. In
one instance (Ks/k/28/12), traces appear on the longer edge rather than on the corner
264
bernadeta kufel-diakowska, stanisław wilk
(Fig. 14:3). This specimen may therefore have been used as an insert mounted in a cutting
tool. In the case of another specimen (Ks/k/20/12), the described traces overlap cone fractures (Fig. 14:4), which may have resulted from impact or perforation. Microwear on two
trapezes (Ks/k/44/12, Ks/k/5/05) is particularly intensive and abrasive in form, and also
appears on the ridges of the dorsal surface (Fig. 14:5-6; 15:1-2). These marks may be partially intentional in nature and the result of abrasion. The traces on the ridges resemble the
microwear visible on the ridges of retouched blades that have had prolonged contact with
a leather sheath. To sum up, the microwear on some of the five trapezes may have had a similar cause, one of which being associated with their use in projectile weapons (tips, barbs,
or blade inserts), while differences in the microwear may be the result of the duration of
their use (cf. Kufel-Diakowska and Bronowicki in press), different models of arming arrows, and additional processing such as edge abrading. It is nevertheless probable that
these traces were produced as a result of various prolonged activities: cutting, perforation,
shooting, or the storage of cutting implements in a sheath.
Nine trapezes display no use-wear traces, which does not rule out the possibility that
they served as parts of arrows or the inserts of other briefly used tools.
DIsCussIon
Considering the overall number of Lublin-Volhynian Culture graves discovered to date
at site 2 in Książnice, it is reasonable to conclude that trapezes were a common burial furnishing. This confirms previous observations made by A. Zakościelna (2010, 137). Trapezes
occurred within seven grave pits and in the vicinity of two (graves 6 and 13). Only one
specimen was found by surface collection.
The number of trapezes deposited in individual graves is diverse, ranging from one to
16 specimens, though the most frequently occurring numbers are one (4 graves), two (3
graves), and three items (1 grave). A similar distribution can be observed at other sites,
where graves contain from one to five trapezes each. Grave 4 in Książnice, which revealed
a concentration of 16 microliths, is an absolute exception.
It should be noted that while graves 4 and 5 were unambiguously demonstrated
through skeletal analysis to contain male burials, in the remaining cases only the age of the
deceased (graves 12, 13, 14, 17) or no information at all (graves 1, 6, 15) is available.
Nevertheless, considering the obvious arrangement of the skeletal material on the right
side in most burials and the grave inventories rich in flint artifacts, it may be assumed that
all of the analyzed features could have been male graves (all sex and age analyses were
conducted by A. Szczepanek). In this regard, there are no exceptions to the rule.
What differentiates the cemetery in Książnice is the heterogeneous location of the trapezes in the grave pits, both in relation to the human remains and to other flint artifacts. It
is worthwhile to compare these observations to the finds from the Jordanów Culture cemetery in Domasław, Kobierzyce Commune, which correspond to an identical chronological
microliths from graves of the lublin-volhynian at site 2 in książnice…
265
horizon (Furmanek and Mozgała-Swacha 2017, 181) and, in many aspects, a similar burial
ritual. Yet the trapezes found at that site were, without exception, uncovered in male
graves, in tight groups located at the knees or the feet of the deceased (Fig. 16). These assemblages are never accompanied by other flint products. Any use-wear present in these
specimens was limited to signs of storage – likely of ready-to-use arrows in a leather quiver
(Kufel-Diakowska et al. 2017, 232, 236-237).
The graves of the Lublin-Volhynian Culture present a more complex situation. Microliths
have been discovered in various parts of the grave pits: at the feet of the deceased accompanied by a group of vessels (Jaszczów 5, grave 2; Krasne Kolonia 16, grave 4; Strzyżów 1A,
grave 1; Złota “Grodzisko II”, grave 101) or as isolated objects (Strzyżów 26, grave 1), or near
the central (Strzyżów 10, grave 3) or upper part of the skeleton (Zakościelna and Libera
2007, 265-266; Zakościelna 2010, 170-171). The trapezes found in Książnice were situated
in the following locations: at the legs (graves 4, 5, 12), next to retouched blades in the vicinity of the chest (graves 15, 17), or grouped with other flint products at the hip (grave 12).
In the case of four graves, the location of the trapezes either cannot be determined precisely (graves 1, 6, 13 and surface finds) or the deposit is dispersed in nature (grave 14).
Studies of the functions played by trapezes offer some possible interpretations. The
microliths differ significantly in terms of the types of microwear and the degree of wear.
The majority of specimens uncovered at the legs should be classified as projectile points
(graves 4, 5, 12, and possibly grave 1, where location of the trapeze is unknown), as
previously noted by A. Zakościelna (2010, 170). The microliths bear impact traces, fractures formed in the shaft or traces produced by storage or transportation. The exception is
one trapeze in grave 12, which displays use-wear associated with the cutting of soft material (hide, meat).
The specimen lacking use-wear, discovered in the area of the hip in grave 12, may have
been placed in a container along with other flints to serve as spare inserts and tools. Similar
groups of flint products appeared at the pelvic bones in all the male graves uncovered in
Domasław. It is difficult to explain the presence of trapezes at the chest, particularly in
light of the accompanying retouched blades. Zakościelna (2010, 171) believes that specimens found near the ribs or hips are the remains of arrows by which the men had been
struck, but, unlike B. Márquez and his team (2008, 322), she does not provide direct evidence for this claim in the form of signs of projectile traces on the bones or impact traces
on the tips. In the case of the Książnice finds, two radically different situations can be observed. The trapeze found between the retouched blades close to chest in grave 15 displays
no use-wear. One trapeze discovered in a similar position, next to the unused retouched
blade in grave 17, should be classified as a projectile point that was likely launched multiple
times. The other specimen can be interpreted either as belonging to an arrow that had
been launched multiple times, or as a tool used for perforating leather. It is impossible,
however, to determine whether the hypothetical arrows were the cause of the young person’s death.
bernadeta kufel-diakowska, stanisław wilk
266
The most heavily damaged specimens are the ones for which the least information is
available concerning their location vis-à-vis the deceased person: one is a surface find,
which came from an empty space between the eastern and western grave fields, while the
other was uncovered in a cremation burial (grave 14), in which flint products were dispersed throughout the entire grave pit. Both microliths display the most intensive microwear on the corner and the ridges. They may have been arrow barbs from which one edge had
been intentionally ground off, or a barb in a cutting tool that had been stored in a leather
sheath. One more heavily worn specimen with traces from the perforation of a soft material was found 0.5 m outside the grave 13.
More thorough interpretations are not possible at this time. New data may be provided
by use-wear analysis of the remaining flint products deposited in the graves. Nevertheless,
it may be tentatively assumed that the trapezes comprised the personal burial furnishings
of the deceased, which would establish a link between the Lublin-Volhynian and Jordanów
rituals.
references
Balcer B. 1983. Wytwórczość narzędzi krzemiennych w neolicie ziem Polski. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
Bronowicki J., Domański G. and Kosicki A. 2001. Badania wielokulturowego stanowiska Ślęża 10, gm.
Kobierzyce, woj. dolnośląskie. In K. Kraśniewska (ed.), Raport 96-99. Wstępne wyniki konserwatorskich badań archeologicznych w strefie budowy autostrad w Polsce za lata 19961999 (= Zeszyty Ośrodka Ratowniczych Badań Archeologicznych. Seria B: Materiały Archeologiczne).Warszawa: Wydawnictwo DiG, 107-129.
Fischer A., Hansen P. V. and Rasmussen P. 1984. Macro and Micro Wear Traces on Lithic Projectile
Points. Experimental Results and Prehistoric Examples. Journal of Danish Archaeology 3,
19-46.
Furmanek M. and Mozgała-Swacha M. 2017. Chronologia absolutna cmentarzyska kultury jordanowskiej w Domasławiu. In B. Gediga (ed.), (= Archeologiczne Zeszyty Autostradowe 19. Badania na autostradzie A-4 14. Cmentarzysko ludności kultury jordanowskiej w Domasławiu,
pow. wrocławski). Wrocław: Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN, 179-196.
Gibaja J. F. and Palomo A. 2004. Geometrics used as projectile points. Economic, social and ideological implications for the Neolithic societies of the 5th-3rd Millennium Cal. BC in Northeast
Iberia. Trabajos de Prehistoria 61(1), 81-97.
Kadrow S. 2009. Obrządek pogrzebowy kultury malickiej. In A. Czekaj-Zastawny (ed.), Obrządek
pogrzebowy kultur pochodzenia naddunajskiego w neolicie Polski południowo-wschodniej
(5600/5500-2900 BC). Kraków: Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN, 53-66.
Kadrow S., Czerniak L., Dobrzańska H., Golański A., Grabowska B., Kurgan-Przybylska M., Rola J.,
Rzepecki S., Sałacińska B., Suchorska-Rola M., Tunia K., Zakościelna A. and Zastawny A.
2009. Katalog źródeł – kultura malicka. In A. Czekaj-Zastawny (ed.), Obrządek pogrzebowy
microliths from graves of the lublin-volhynian at site 2 in książnice…
267
kultur pochodzenia naddunajskiego w neolicie Polski południowo-wschodniej (5600/55002900 BC). Kraków: Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN, 217-258.
Korobkova G. F. 1999. Narzędzia w pradziejach. Podstawy badania funkcji metodą traseologiczną.
Toruń: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika.
Kufel-Diakowska B. and Bronowicki J. in press. Problem użytkowania eneolitycznych grocików trzoneczkowatych. Śląskie Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 59.
Kufel-Diakowska B., Wiśniewski A. and Chłoń M. 2017. Wyroby ze skał krzemionkowych w pochówkach
kultury jordanowskiej stanowiska Domasław. In B. Gediga (ed.), (= Archeologiczne Zeszyty Autostradowe 19. Badania na autostradzie A-4 14. Cmentarzysko ludności kultury jordanowskiej
w Domasławiu, pow. wrocławski).Wrocław: Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN, 215-268.
Kulczycka-Leciejewiczowa A. 1979. Pierwsze społeczeństwa rolnicze na ziemiach polskich kultury kręgu naddunajskiego. In W Hensel and T. Wiślański (eds.), Prahistoria ziem polskich 2. Neolit.
Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, 19-164.
Lammers-Keijsers Y., Verbaas A., Van Gijn A. and Pomstra D. 2014. Arrowheads without Traces:
Not Used, Perfect Hit or Excessive Hafting Material? In J. Marreiros, N. Bicho and J. F. Gibaja (eds.), International Conference on Use-Wear Analysis Use-Wear 2012. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 457-465.
Márquez B., Gibaja J. F., González J. E., Ibáńez J. J. and Palomo A. 2008. Projectile point as signs of
violence in collective burials during the 4th and the 3rd millennia cal BC, in the north-east of
the Iberian penisula. In L. Longo and N. Skakun (eds.), “Prehistoric Technology” 40 years
later: Functional Studies and the Russian Legacy (= British Archaeological Reports. International Series 1783). Oxford: Archaeopress, 321-326.
Mateiciucová I. 2008. Talking stones: the chipped stone industry in Lower Austria and Moravia and
the Beginnings of the Neolithic in Central Europe (LBK), 5700-4900 BC (= Dissertationes
Archaeologicae Brunenses/Pragensesque 4). Brno, Praha: Masarykova univerzita.
Nuzhnyĭ D. 1990. Projectile Damage on Upper Paleolithic Microliths. Use of Bow and Arrow among
Pleistocene Hunters in the Ukraine. In B. Gräslund, H. Knutsson, K. Knutsson and J. Taffinder (eds.), The Interpretative Possibilities of Microwear Studies, Proceedings of the International Conference on Lithic Use-wear Analysis, 15th-17th February 1989 in Uppsala, Sweden (= Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis 14). Uppsala: Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis
Department of Archaeology, 113-124.
Osipowicz G. 2010. Narzędzia krzemienne w epoce kamienia na ziemi chełmińskiej. Studium traseologiczne. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
Pyżewicz K. 2012. Tropem mezolitycznych łowców. Interpretacja funkcji zbrojników z wybranych stanowisk. Fontes Archaeologici Posnanienses 48, 97-110.
Pyżewicz K. 2013. Inwentarze krzemienne społeczności mezolitycznych bytujących w zachodniej
części Niżu Polskiego. Zielona Góra: Wydawnictwo Fundacji Archeologicznej.
Van Gijn A. 2014. The materiality of Funnelbeaker burial practices: evidence from the microscope. In
J. Marreiros, N. Bicho and J. F. Gibaja (eds.), International Conference on Use-Wear Analysis
Use-Wear 2012. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 693-701.
bernadeta kufel-diakowska, stanisław wilk
268
Wilk S. 2004. Graves of the Lublin-Volhynian culture at site 2 in Książnice, district of Busko Zdrój.
2001/2002, 2003 exploration seasons. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 56, 223-270.
Wilk S. 2006. Graves of the Lublin-Volhynian culture at site 2 in Książnice, district of Busko Zdrój.
2004 exploration season, Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 58, 247-273.
Wilk S. 2016. A New data about chronology of the impact of the Hunyadihalom-Lažňany horizon on
Younger Danubian cultures north of the Carpathian Mountains. Recherches Archéologiques,
Nouvelle Serie 8, 7-28.
Wilk S. and Kufel-Diakowska B. 2016. The Lublin-Volhynian culture retouched blade daggers in light
of usewear analysis of artefacts from burials at site 2 in Książnice, Poland. Archaeologia Polona 54, 151-165.
Wilk S. and Szczepanek A. 2017. The first cremation traces in the Eneolithic period north of the Carpathian Mountains. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 69, 353-372.
Winiarska-Kabacińska M. 2008. Functional analysis as a tool for the interpretation of mortuary practices. A case study from the Corded Ware Culture graves at Zielona, southern Poland. In
L. Longo and N. Skakun (eds.), “Prehistoric Technology” 40 years later: Functional Studies
and the Russian Legacy (= British Archaeological Reports. International Series 1783).
Oxford: Archaeopress, 331-335.
Wiślański T. 1979a. Kształtowanie się miejscowych kultur rolniczo-hodowlanych. Plemiona kultury
pucharów lejkowatych. In W Hensel and T. Wiślański (eds.), Prahistoria ziem polskich 2.
Neolit. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, 165-260.
Wiślański T. 1979b. Dalszy rozwój ludów neolitycznych. Plemiona kultury amfor kulistych. In W. Hensel
and T. Wiślański (eds.), Prahistoria ziem polskich 2. Neolit. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im.
Ossolińskich, 261-300.
Yaroshevich A., Kaufman D., Nuzhnyy D., Bar-Yosef O. and Weinstein-Evron M. 2010. Design and
performance of microlith implemented projectiles during the Middle and the Late Epipaleolithic of the Levant: experimental and archaeological evidence. Journal of Archaeological
Science 37(2), 368-388.
Yaroshevich A. 2012. Experimentally obtained examples of projectile damage: cases of similar fracture
types on microlithic tips and side elements. Bulgarian e-Journal of Archaeology 1/2012.
Zakościelna A. 1996. Krzemieniarstwo kultury wołyńsko-lubelskiej ceramiki malowanej (= Lubelskie Materiały Archeologiczne 10). Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.
Zakościelna A. 2010. Studium obrządku pogrzebowego kultury lubelsko-wołyńskiej. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.
Zakościelna A. and Libera J. 2007. Geometric microliths in grave inventories of Neolithic cultures in
Małopolska (south-eastern Poland). In M. Masojć, T. Płonka, B. Ginter and S. K. Kozłowski
(eds.), Contributions to the Central European Stone Age. Wrocław: Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytet Wrocławski, 257-270.