This project began by noticing that congregations have grown weary of preaching, and the only explanation they have for this problem is a methodological failure on the part of the preacher. Many members of our congregations do not realize...
moreThis project began by noticing that congregations have grown weary of preaching, and the only explanation they have for this problem is a methodological failure on the part of the preacher. Many members of our congregations do not realize that they are part of the preaching experience and can improve their experience by listening well. The problem is complicated by their lack of a theology of preaching. Further, the congregation has no resources available to correct the problem. The congregation shapes the preaching that it receives over time; therefore, for the theology of preaching to be corrected, it must be corrected for the members of the congregation. The Biblical-Theological Rationale of this project begins by discussing the theology of words. Afterward, several New Testament words translated as "preaching" are discussed, followed by an exegesis of two Pauline passages: Romans 10: 14-21 and 1 Corinthians 1: 17-2:5. The project then explores the role of the Holy Spirit in preaching; insisting that preaching is a means of grace. The project uses a sample group from Samaria Baptist Church in Raleigh, NC and pre-tests their existing thinking about preaching. The sample was then divided into a focus group and a control group. The focus group attended a series of Bible studies about preaching. The teaching methods were lecture and discussion. The Bible studies lasted about one hour each. Following the Bible studies both were groups post-tested. There was a follow-up conversation with the focus group as well as interviews with two members of the focus group to detect bias. This project used both quantitative and qualitative analysis. The focus group participants were able to increase their scores significantly from pre-test to post-test. Furthermore, the focus group participants demonstrated their competency during the follow-up conversation by declaring their improved ability to listen to preaching in the follow-up conversation. For future research, a larger focus group could be drawn and taught the same information. Afterward, they could be tested immediately following the completion of the teaching process. Several months later, the effectiveness of listening to preaching over time could be determined.