One of the main themes in today’s global economic system is whether or not certain countries will ever be able to ‘catch up’, and if so, how to go about this. There is no shortage of institutions and schools of thought willing and wanting...
moreOne of the main themes in today’s global economic system is whether or not certain countries will ever be able to ‘catch up’, and if so, how to go about this. There is no shortage of institutions and schools of thought willing and wanting to prescribe the best ways to go about this quest of economic catching up, growing and developing.
One of the most popular ideas on how to achieve economic growth and development currently is that of foreign direct investment (FDI). Neatly in line with reigning neoliberal ideals, proponents of FDI as a strategy for growth and development believe it to link its host countries into the rest of the globalised world in ways that will benefit both, and that it will provide countries with much-needed capital for more investment in the pursuit of profit by the private sector.
Despite global enthusiasm for and focus on FDI, some regions and countries – in this particular instance the Southern African Development Community (SADC) – have not managed to attract as much FDI as they would have liked to, and developed countries continue to be both the major hosts and homes to FDI.3 This essay proposes that this is due to the fact that policies and programmes are designed with general determinants in mind, while the more important industry- and country-specific contextual aspects are not adequately dealt with. One-size- fits-all rarely works, and there is no reason to believe the realm of FDI would be different.
The research question examined in this essay is:
Can the main industries in SADC countries better account for differences in values of FDI attracted than the FDI determinants generally agreed upon in literature and followed in typical FDI promotion programmes?
This essay argues that one can indeed make better sense of the differences in values of FDI attracted in SADC when one looks more closely at differences in industrial composition. The implication of this for future FDI-related research is that more attention must be paid to the country-, industry-, even firm-, - but at least context- - specific factors in assessing how much FDI a country is likely to attract, or what it can do to attract more.
The essay follows the following structure: First it provides a short overview of why FDI is believed to be of such importance to economic growth and development. Following this, an overview is given of the common agreed-upon determinants for FDI attraction, relating to the business and economic environment. Finally, FDI attraction in SADC countries is analysed, comparing the country-specific factors of industrial composition and the common FDI determinants in order to show that the latter lead to puzzlement, while a focus on the former generally helps clear matters up. Ultimately, not the business environment but rather the structure of the economy determines success or failure in attracting FDI.