В статье говорится о роли А.И. Тереножкина в становлении полевой археологии Средней Азии, и о его предшественниках - И.А. Сухареве, Г.В. Григорьеве, Н.Н. Забелиной, П.В. Лифиренко.
The article considers Moscow Sociological School of the 1960s - 1970s, which originated on the basis of the research project “Social Organization” developed by talented Moscow sociologists and philosophers. Under the leadership of N.I.... more
The article considers Moscow Sociological School of the 1960s - 1970s, which originated on the basis of the research project “Social Organization” developed by talented Moscow sociologists and philosophers. Under the leadership of N.I. Lapin, they made a methodological breakthrough that was not correctly understood at that time and is still underestimated. The concept “labor collective” used by the overwhelming majority of Soviet scientists to describe personnel of an industrial enterprise or a working team had a huge ideological potential and was politically engaged. This concept helped not to explain the empirical data, but rather to demonstrate the high socialist morality of the working class and its solidarity with the leading party cell. The sector for the study of labor collectives was established in 1968, and in 1969 it was transformed into a department focusing on the world science achievements. Due to the thorough study of such innovations, the concept “labor collective” gradually evolved into a more fruitful and promising concept “social organization”. Such a methodological move allowed to use the system approach that was popular at that period, to rely on the findings of Western sociology, mainly on the structural-functional analysis, and on the motivational models of social interaction developed in management. In just five years, participants of the project conducted 28 empirical studies of 100 objects. The total number of respondents was about 25 thousand. The list of publications of the project participants consists of 35 monographs, 10 thematic collections and more than 50 articles (more than 600 publications in total). The team of scientists was dismissed for political reasons.
The article considers the problem of educational institution promotion in the external socio-cultural environment via innovative management, in particular, the Public relations system. The solution to this problem is important in terms of... more
The article considers the problem of educational institution promotion in the external socio-cultural environment via innovative management, in particular, the Public relations system. The solution to this problem is important in terms of fierce competition in the educational services market. The authors draw attention to the fact that scientific schools as unique associations of university science representatives can be considered as one of the effective elements of the university image policy development. They outlined the primary tasks of the university scientific school positive image development in the public relations system, PR tools are highlighted in the internal university environment and in the external sphere of the university, where the following segments are considered as the target audience: the scientific community outside the university, potential employers of university graduates, and the population represented by potential applicants and their parents.
Статья является второй из двух статей автора по теме сетевого анализа историографии Ассоциации «История и компьютер» (АИК) с 1992 по 2016 гг. В предыдущей статье рассматривается динамика состава и структуры сети АИК на уровне региональных... more
Статья является второй из двух статей автора по теме сетевого анализа историографии Ассоциации «История и компьютер» (АИК) с 1992 по 2016 гг. В предыдущей статье рассматривается динамика состава и структуры сети АИК на уровне региональных центров исторической информатики, их специализации в проблемном, методическом, технологическом аспектах. Данная статья посвящена анализу структуры и динамики межрегиональной группы – основной компоненты сети АИК. Рассматривается специализация четырех традиционных школ исторической информатики – московской, минской, барнаульской и тамбовской – и их взаимодействие. Исследование проводится на материалах созданной автором информационной системы, включающей библиографическую и полнотекстовую базы данных публикаций АИК. Методом исследования является сетевой анализ. В статье сформулированы выводы о перспективах изучения научных связей между исследователями, работающими в русле одного направления, полученные с помощью методов и технологий сетевого анализа. Этот подход позволяет изучать формирование как формальных, так и «виртуальных» научных коллективов: на основе сведений о соавторстве можно проследить процесс появления научных центров и школ, их динамику, концентрацию, центральные фигуры, вокруг которых формируются эти группы. Связывая информацию о группах с тематическими рубриками публикуемых работ, можно выявлять специфику научных интересов этих групп, их сходство и различия.
The correspondence of Vasyl Oleksiyovych Gorodtsov (1860—1945) and Oleksiy Ivanovich Terenozhkin (1907—1981), the iconic persons for Russian and Ukrainian archaeology, is attractive first of all as the dialog between the Teacher and the... more
The correspondence of Vasyl Oleksiyovych Gorodtsov (1860—1945) and Oleksiy Ivanovich Terenozhkin (1907—1981), the iconic persons for Russian and Ukrainian archaeology, is attractive first of all as the dialog between the Teacher and the disciple. Eight letters of Terenozhkin are kept in archive collection of Gorodtsov in the Department of written sources of the State Historical Museum, two letters of Gorodtsov are present in the private archive of Terenozhkin. That communication was not long-lasting, only during years of 1939—1942, though the letters of those years elucidate some of previously unknown facts and events of episodes and affairs of the scientific activity of Terenozhkin and intricacies of his fate, in particular, in Uzbekistan. The letters dated by the years of 1939—1941 are related to the period of Terenozhkin’s search of his scientific mission and destiny and the beginning of his working in Uzbekistan: the transfer to Tashkent, energetic start of the archeological and teaching activities. In these letters he was eager to share with Gorodtsov the first results of the exploration in the zone of construction of Big canal of Tashkent and in Ak-Tepe hillfort, to acquaint the Teacher with the treasure of Chimbailyk and to ask an advise regarding its chronology. The letters dated by the years of 1941—1942 were written when Тerenozhkin participated in World War II combat but their major subjects were the same: the archeology, the thoughts about the adoring science and the hope to meet the teacher in the future. The letters of Gorodtsov were imbued with the amiability and sincere interest to the work of his disciple in Central Asia. He emphasized the importance of the newest archeological findings in Turkenstan, shared the news about the work progress of the second volume of «Archeology». So the published correspondence covers the veil in the relations and the dialog between the Teacher and his disciple.
