Lecture 44 45 AGC 1 and 2
Lecture 44 45 AGC 1 and 2
Lecture 44 45 AGC 1 and 2
1.0 INTRODUCTION Maintaining power system frequency at constant value is very important for the health of the power generating equipment and the utilization equipment at the customer end. The job of automatic frequency regulation is achieved by governing systems of individual turbine-generators and Automatic Generation Control (AGC) or Load frequency control ( LFC) system of the power system. 2.0 FREQUENCY VARIATION IN A SINGLE MACHINE To understand the variation of frequency in a power system, we can consider a single machine connected to an isolated load, as shown in the figure below.
Turbine
Gen
Pl
Pm
Fig.1 SINGLE TURBINE GENERATOR WITH LOAD
Normally, the turbine mechanical power (Pm) and the electrical load power (Pl) are equal. Whenever there is a change in load, with mechanical power remaining the same the speed () of the turbine generator changes as decided by the rotating inertia (M) of the rotor system, as given by the following differential equation.. Pm-Pl = M [d/dt ] The governing system senses this change in speed and adjusts steam control valve so that mechanical power (Pm) matches with the changed load (Pl). Speed variation stops but at a different steady value. The change in frequency () at steady state can be described using the following equation in terms of change in load ( Pl) and a factor R called speed regulation or droop. = - [ Pl ]( R) A 20 % change in load ( Pl = 0.2 per unit) causes 1 % change in frequency ( = 0.01 p.u) with a per unit (p.u) droop value of 0.05. Similarly full load throw off ( Pl = - 1.0)
causes 5 % change in speed. ( = + 0.05). This is described by the well known droop characteristic.
52 5
Frequency (Hz)
50 5% Droop
0% Fig.2
50%
100%
Load
3.0 NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTARY CONTROL Now when there is a load change, speed settles down after a transient period at a value different from the original steady speed. This new speed value is dictated by the droop value. For instance a 100 % load rejection will cause the machine speed to settle down at 105 % speed, with a droop value of 5 %, as shown in the figure below. During the transient, speed may touch a higher value as shown in the figure (by TSR: transient speed rise). The speed however has to be brought back to the original value for which speed/ load reference (Pref) has to be adjusted either by the operator or by a supplementary control system.
Load TSR (6 - 10%) 100% 0% t 5% Droop 100%
Speed (%)
In the speed control system block diagram shown in Fig. 4, when elec. load changes, reference set point is to be adjusted to restore speed to the pre-disturbed value. This is equivalent to shifting the speed droop characteristic to match the new operating load as shown in Fig. 5.
GOVERNOR
TURBINE
ROTOR INERTIA
Valve Position
Mechanical
Power
Elec. load
S P E E D
Frequency (Hz)
50
0% Fig.5
50%
100%
Load
4.0 AUTOMATIC GENERATION CONTROL (AGC) Automatic Generation Control (AGC) usually implemented in Energy Management system (EMS) of Energy Control centers (ECC) consists of Load frequency control Economic Dispatch Interchange scheduling
LOAD FREQUENCY CONTROL The speed/ frequency variation concept can be extended from a single turbine- generator system to a power system comprising several turbine- generators as shown in Fig.6. Now the mismatch between the total power generated and the total electrical load causes the frequency change as dictated by the combined system inertia. The governors of all the
machines sense the frequency and the mechanical power outputs will be changed automatically to match the combined generation with the new combined load. This action is called primary regulation. But frequency remains at a new value and set points must be adjusted, just as in single machine case for frequency restoration. This job is done by the Automatic Load Frequency controller (ALFC) as shown in Fig. 7. This process of set point adjustment is called secondary regulation. When load change occurs frequency varies and the regulation initially for the first few seconds is due to the action of the governors of all generating units and subsequently the Load frequency control system prevails.
Pref
Composite Governor
Composite Turbine
Frequency
Set point AUTOMATIC LOAD REQUENCY CONTROLLER Generator Other m/c Power Governor Turbine
Secondary regulation
Total Load
+ +
GRID INERTIA
+
Frequency
Area Frequency
5.0 POWER SYSTEM FREQUENCY CONTROL :INDIAN SCENARIO In India, the power system is divided into regions. Load Despatch Center in each region monitors the frequency by interacting with State Load Despatch Centers and generating 4
stations under the control of States and the generating companies like NTPC, NHPC. The Regional Load Despatch Centers (RLDC) function under Power Grid Corporation of India. So, for the purpose of frequency each region can be considered as one coherent unit. For instance Southern RLDC comprises AP, TN, Karnataka, Kerala and Goa. SRLDC is located in Bangalore. For the load frequency control, the generating units at Hydro power plant are normally adjusted as the response is faster to raise/lower the power. Thermal power plants have rate limitations due to thermal stresses. But all units are expected to participate in primary regulation. Load Generation imbalance causes frequency variation. Load is never constant. Precise frequency control is possible only if there is a surplus generating capacity, which is not the case in many states. Hence load shedding is resorted to for frequency management. There is no AUTOMATIC load frequency control in many regions as many utilities want to generate to the maximum possible extent and would not like their generation levels adjusted by ALFC. Mostly manual control is only exercised to maintain frequency. In many cases, generators are not allowed to participate in primary regulation also i.e., the natural tendency of the governors to raise/ lower generation when frequency falls/ rises is suppressed. With the result, frequency is always less than the rated value of 50 Hz. When sudden disturbances occur, system collapses causing blackouts. The situation has vastly improved in the recent years after the introduction of availability cased tariff (ABT) and free governor mode of operation (FGMO) regimes. 6.0 FREE GOVERNOR MODE OF OPERATION (FGMO) To maintain grid discipline, all generating units shall have their governors in free operation (natural governing ) at all times. In Indian grid code the following specifications are given. The rated System frequency is 50 Hz and the target range for control should be 49.0 Hz 50.0 Hz the statutory acceptable limits are 48.5 - 51.5Hz. Each operating machine should pick up load as below: Up to MCR: 5% extra load for at least 5 minutes. Above MCR :105 % of MCR Facility available like load limiters, ATRS etc, shall not be used to suppress natural governor action in any manner All governors shall have a droop of between 3% and 6%. No dead band or time delays should be deliberately introduced Each Generating Unit shall be capable of instantaneously increasing output by 5% when the frequency falls, limited to 105% MCR.
Ramping back to the previous MW level (in case the increased output level can not be sustained) shall not be faster than 1% per minute. At 49 Hz, all constituents shall resort to adequate manual load shedding instantly, Operating frequency should not touch such level, which may trigger Under Frequency Relay (UFR) operation; as UFR actuated shedding is meant only for taking care of contingencies like sudden losses of bulk generation etc. The recommended rate for changing the governor setting, i.e., supplementary control for increasing or decreasing the output (generation level) for all generating units, irrespective of their type and size, would be one (1.0) per cent per minute or as per manufacturers limits. However, if frequency falls below 49.5 Hz, all partly loaded generating units shall pick up additional load at a faster rate, according to their capability.
Implementation of FGMO in power plant In a typical 200 MW/ 250 MW thermal power plant, implementation scheme is shown in the figure below.
SCHEME OF FGMO.
FGMO WORKS WITHIN THE LOAD SET PT LIMITS OF 175 MW TO 220 MW ONLY CMC LOAD ST. PT. CMC MAX LOAD LIMIT. ( 220 MW) LOAD CORRECTION DUE TO FREQ. +/- 20 MW MIN. LOAD SET POINT.
LOAD CORRECTION OF +/- APPOX 2.5 MW FOR +/- 1 KG/CM2 MIN TURBINE CONTROL. TURB MAX LOAD LIMIT. (220 MW)
The Coordinated Master Control ( CMC) scheme gives commands to the turbine control as well as the boiler fuel control to raise/lower generation. When frequency changes these command signals are modified with a limit of plus or minus 20MW as shown below in Fig.9.
In case CMC is not there FGMO can be implemented in the Load control loop of the electro hydraulic turbine controller (EHTC).
LOAD CORRECTION WITHOUT DEAD BAND
Fig.9
+20 MW
48Hz
49Hz
50
51 Hz
52 Hz
- 20 MW
7.0 AUTOMATIC GENERATION CONTROL : DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS The objective of the AGC in an interconnected power system is to maintain the frequency of each area and to keep tie-line power close to the scheduled values by adjusting the MW outputs the AGC generators so as to accommodate fluctuating load demands. The components of AGC in the modern power system are: Load-frequency control (LFC) Economic dispatch (ED) Interchange scheduling (IS)
When frequency changes, under primary regulation, governors respond immediately. But as mentioned earlier, frequency does not get restored but will settle down at a different value. At this point of time LFC function comes in to the picture.LFC maintains the system frequency by performing the function of Secondary Regulation. It provides generation set points to the generators participating in the frequency regulation. But these set points may not be the optimum from cost point of view. Economic dispatch (ED) function readjusts the set points of the generations after the time scale of LFC. In a large interconnected power system there are a number of areas connected by tie lines with share agreements with neighbors. The LFC and ED functions have to take care of these agreements. This function is performed by Interchange Scheduling (IS).. Each of these areas is responsible for generating enough power to meet its own customers or "native load." By keeping the generated power equal to the power consumed by the load, utilities keep the overall system frequency at 50 Hz. Not only must areas adjust their generation to meet their own changing native load, but they must also maintain any scheduled tie-line transactions. It is possible, by monitoring both the tie-line flow and the system frequency to determine the proper generation action (raise or lower). Thus, electric utilities use an automatic generation control (AGC) system to balance their moment-to-moment electrical generation to load within a given control area.
The current practice of the load frequency control (LFC) function of automatic generation control (AGC) is based on a strategy known as tie-line bias control. In this control strategy each area of an interconnected system tries to regulate its area control error (ACE) to zero, where:
The term (T,-T, ) is the difference between the actual and the schleduled net interchange on the tie lines. The term representing the area's natural response to frequency deviations is lOp(f,-f,). The coefficient, p, is known as the system natural response coefficient. It is difficult to obtain an accurate value of p since it depends on the governor reslponse capability of the generating units presently on-line and the frequency dependence of the constantly changing load. This characteristic is expressed as:
where, (1/R) is the generator regulation or droop, D is the load damping Characteristic.
Figure 10: AREA CONTROL ERROR WITH FREQUENCY Area Control Error (ACE) ACE = Net Interchange + f Net Interchange = Interchange error = Scheduled Actual f = = frequency deviation = frequency bias ( pu MW/ pu frequency) Basic Idea in AGC design is that when :ACE> 0 generation decreased and ACE<0 generation is increased. As long as one frequency bias 0, if all areas have ACE=0: then = 0 and all Net Interchange =0 Driving ACE to zero restores frequency and interchange LFC Implementation: Ideally Prefi = -ACEi
More practically it is necessary to use integral control ( or Proportional integral control) Prefi = - Ki ACEi dt Note in steady state Prefi must become constant and ACEi=0. Then necessarily Prefi=Pli. Integral control with stable gain Ki guarantees zero error.
LFC Implementation
~ every 4 sec
ACE Filters
Allocation To Plants
Other Considerations Economic Dispatch Actual Unit Movement Minimum Movement Severity Unit Energy Balance Response Rate
Time error
In the modern Energy Management Systems (EMS) automatic load frequency control system (ALFC) is part of Automatic Generation Control (AGC). In power systems, where automatic control does not exist, manual control of set points is done on instructions from dispatch center. In this response curve taken from published literature, a loss of generation has resulted in a frequency fall from 60.01 Hz to 59.209 Hz and due to governor actions (primary regulation), frequency starts increasing and it should have settled around 59.75 Hz as shown
below.
Fig. 12 Typical frequency response of a 60-Hz power system with Automatic Generation Control (AGC) for a step load increase But Automatic Generation Control (AGC) system which includes Load Frequency Control (LFC) acts on the set points of the governors and frequency gets restored to the 60 Hz value as shown in the response curve (Fig. 12). For a similar system, measured frequency variation when large generation is lost is shown in Fig. 13.
Fig. 13 Typical frequency response of a 60-Hz power system with Automatic Generation Control (AGC) for a generation loss
10
The AGC implemented in developed countries includes load frequency control (LFC), economic dispatch (ED) and interchange scheduling (IS). These are implemented as application programs in Energy Management System (EMS) software located in Energy Control Centers. (ECC). The implementation scheme for AGC is shown in Fig. 14 .The AGC function within SCADA/EMS will receive frequency, generations (MW) etc., signals through remote terminal units (RTUs).
Generation Signals (MW) Frequency (f)
f Set Point Electro Hydraulic Governor (EHG) Set Point Electro Hydraulic Governor (EHG) f Set Point TurbineGenerator (TG) f TurbineGenerator (TG)
System Frequency
TurbineGenerator (TG)
HYDRO POWER PLANTS Fig. 14 Typical implementation schemeof Automatic Generation Control (AGC) When there is a frequency change primary control action is performed by the governors of prime movers. After few seconds Secondary Control function by Automatic generation controller (AGC) is initiated. AGC computes the set point changes required to restore the frequency to the set value and issues commands to participating generating units. 8.0 CONCLUSIONS The basic concepts of power system load frequency control system are described in this article. In the literature, it is also referred to as Automatic Generation Control (AGC) where apart from load frequency control, economic allocation is also included. The
11
computer based Energy Management System (EMS) installed in modern power systems includes AGC also. The concepts of Free governor mode of operation (FGMO) and implementation are also described. 9.0 REFERENCES 1. Frequency Control Concerns In The North American Electric Power System December 2002 by B. J. Kirby, J. Dyer, C. Martinez, Dr. Rahmat A. Shoureshi R. Guttromson, J. Dagle, December 2002, ORNL Consortium for Electric Reliability Technology Solutions 2. N. Jaleeli, D.N. Ewart, and L.H. Fink, Understanding Automatic Generation Control, IEEE Transactions on Power System, Vol. 7, No. 3 August 1992, pp. 1106- 1122. 3. A.J. Wood and B.F. Wollenberg, Power Generation, Operation, & Control, John Wiley & Sons, 1984. 4. R.L. King and R. Luck, Intelligent Control Concepts for Automatic Generation Control of Power Systems, NSF Annual Report ECS-92-16549, March 31, 1995. 5. P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control, The EPRI Power System Engineering Series, McGraw-Hill, 1994 6. C. Concordia, F. P. deMello, L.K. Kirchmayer and R. P. Schulz, "Effect of PrimeMover Response and Governing Characteristics on System Dynamic Performance," American Power Conference, 1966, Vol. 28, pp. 1074-85, IEEE transactions on Power Systems, Vol. XX, 1999 7. Dynamic Analysis of Generation Control Performance Standards Tetsuo Sasaki, Kazuhiro Enomoto 8. Nasser Jaleeli, Louis S. VanSlyck: NERCS NEW CONTROL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems,Vol.14,No.3,pp.1092-1099,1999 9. North American Electric Reliability Council, NERC Operating Manual, Policy 10, available at http://www.nerc.com.
12