Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2K views

    DIN 2076 vs. ASTM A 877

    Uploaded by

    tobypadfield
    The document compares material specifications for two types of steel: DIN 2076 patented cold-drawn carbon steel and ASTM A 877-93 oil-tempered Cr-Si alloy steel. ASTM A 877-93 has more stringent requirements controlling surface defects, decarburization, and inclusion levels, making it better suited than DIN 2076 carbon steel for applications with high dynamic stresses or stresses at moderately elevated temperatures.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    DIN 2076 vs. ASTM A 877

    Uploaded by

    tobypadfield
    2K views1 page
    The document compares material specifications for two types of steel: DIN 2076 patented cold-drawn carbon steel and ASTM A 877-93 oil-tempered Cr-Si alloy steel. ASTM A 877-93 has more stringent requirements controlling surface defects, decarburization, and inclusion levels, making it better suited than DIN 2076 carbon steel for applications with high dynamic stresses or stresses at moderately elevated temperatures.

    Original Description:

    Comparison of two spring steel specifications

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document compares material specifications for two types of steel: DIN 2076 patented cold-drawn carbon steel and ASTM A 877-93 oil-tempered Cr-Si alloy steel. ASTM A 877-93 has more stringent requirements controlling surface defects, decarburization, and inclusion levels, making it better suited than DIN 2076 carbon steel for applications with high dynamic stresses or stresses at moderately elevated temperatures.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    2K views1 page

    DIN 2076 vs. ASTM A 877

    Uploaded by

    tobypadfield
    The document compares material specifications for two types of steel: DIN 2076 patented cold-drawn carbon steel and ASTM A 877-93 oil-tempered Cr-Si alloy steel. ASTM A 877-93 has more stringent requirements controlling surface defects, decarburization, and inclusion levels, making it better suited than DIN 2076 carbon steel for applications with high dynamic stresses or stresses at moderately elevated temperatures.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    DIN 2076 Patented, cold-drawn carbon steel (material spec DIN 17223 Part 1) Generally used for high

    static stress, low dynamic stress applications

    ASTM A 877 93 Oil-tempered, Cr-Si alloy steel Valve spring quality, suitable for high dynamic stresses at moderately elevated temperatures No defects allowed within 1% of outer diameter (hot-acid etch) Decarburization must be < 25 m (measured from outer diameter) Stringent requirements for inclusion levels (ASTM E 45)

    No real requirements for surface defects No real requirement for decarburization limit No real requirement for inclusion levels

    KEY POINTS Both materials have similar requirements for tensile strength, but microstructure (oil-tempered alloy steel vs. patented, cold-drawn carbon steel) differences result in better load loss for Cr-Si, especially at 150 C. The additional requirements for surface defects, decarburization, and inclusion levels make the Cr-Si Valve Spring Quality wire substantially better for fatigue applications.

    You might also like