Control N Instrumentation Lab Experiments
Control N Instrumentation Lab Experiments
General Instructions
The laboratory classes will begin in the very first day of class in each semester. However for
those who are attaining the classes for the first time, the very first week is scheduled for
giving instructions, laboratory sheet etc.
The students must come to the laboratory duly prepared with the knowledge of the theories
and the methods on the experiment to be performed.
The attendance in laboratory classes is must. The grade will be allotted by the concerned
teacher based on the knowledge, performance of the experiments, lab reports and
examination.
Grade will be awarded on the following basis
Grade Marks Grade Marks Grade Marks Grade Marks Grade Marks Grade Marks
S+
9.5 A+
8.5 B+
7.5 C+
6.5 D+
5.5 E+
4.5
S
9 A
8 B
7 C
6 D
5 E
4
Shovan Bhaumik
Ahmad Ali
EE, IIT Patna
EE 371
Experiment 2
IIT Patna
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Figure 1
Figure 2
Apparatus: (i) Cantilever beam (ii) strain gage (iii) OP AMP (v) multimeter etc
Procedure & Experimental Results:
(i) Measure the resistance of the strain gage with multimeter. Now deform the cantilever beam and
note down the resistance of the strain gauges for maximum possible deformation.
(ii) Now set up the experiment using single strain gage as shown in figure 1. Set the micrometer such
that there is no deformation of the beam but the micrometer is just touching the rod located to
deform the beam.
(iii) Set the wheatstone bridge resistance R1 and R2 as 1K. Set the amplifier gain as 100, vary the value
of R3 such that zero (or nearest to zero) is obtained on the output of the amplifier. To obtain zero
voltage at the amplifier output corresponding to zero deflection; you may external offset balancing
technique.
(iv) Now in step vary the slider up to 6mm in micrometer screw gage and note down the output voltage,
micrometer and dial gage readings. Also move the micrometer in reverse order and note down the
same parameters.
(v) Plot the output voltage with displacement of cantilever beam. You may subtract the bias voltage
from the readings if necessary. Calculate the slope in volt/mm.
(vi) Knowing the amplifier gain and the bridge supply voltage; (given that G=2.2 for the gage in use and
Rst gage=120 ohm) calculate strain in each reading. Now plot strain with the output voltage values.
From the graph calculate the change in output voltage to the change in strain, ie volt output per unit
strain change.
(vii) Now displace the cantilever beam arbitrarily. Observe the output voltage. From the graph
calculate the strain in the beam. Now calculate the theoretical value of the strain and compare the
both.
(viii) Connect the circuit as shown in figure 2 using two strain gages.
(ix) Repeat the steps from (iii) to (viii). Compare the sensitivity in both the cases.
Few Questions for Viva Voce:
(i) What are the different types of material used for strain gage? How the gage is fixed with the
specimen under measurement?
(ii) What is semiconductor strain gage? What are the advantages and disadvantages of that?
(iii) State the advantages of using dual strain gage instead of single one? What is dummy gage?
(iv) Can the strain gage be used as an extensometer or to measure force and torque?
Reference:
(i) Feedback manual, complete transducers kit TK2942-001.
(ii) E O Doebelin and D.N. Manik, Measurement systems, Tata McGraw Hill, special Indian edition, 2007.
(iii) A.D. Helfric and William D. Cooper, Modern electronics instrumentation and measurement techniques, PHI
learning private limited, New Delhi.
1
EE 371
Experiment 3
IIT Patna
Objective:
To plot the gain and phase angle with frequency of an unknown linear system and to
determine the transfer function of the system from the graph.
1.2
Apparatus: (i) Black box (ii) Audio frequency oscillator (iii) CRO
1.3
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
EE 371
Experiment 4
IIT Patna
Apparatus: (i) Thermocouple (ii) Heat bar (iii) Thermometer (iv) OP AMP etc.
1.3
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
(ix)
Warning: Do not touch the heat bar during experiment. It contains hot surface
EE 371
Experiment 5
IIT Patna
Objective:
To determine the coefficient of discharge of orificemeter and venturimeter
Determine the flow inside a pipe using orificemeter and venturimeter
Apparatus: (i) Venturimeter orificemeter apparatus (ii) Stop watch (iii) Thermometer.
Procedure & Experimental Results:
Open the bypass valve and start the motor.
Close the venturimeter valve and open the orificemeter valve fully.
Note the manometer displacement (hm) actual discharge rate (Qact in m3/s) and calculate
theoretical discharge rate (Qth), discharge coefficient (Cd) and Reynolds number (Re.)
(iv)
Vary the bypass valve position in steps from fully close to fully open. Note the readings and
calculate the parameters described above.
(v)
Now open the venturimeter valve and close the same of orificemeter. Follow the steps from
(ii) to (iv).
(vi)
Plot actual discharge rate (Qact )vs manometer height (hm) and discharge coefficient vs
Reynolds number. You may also plot log(Qact) vs log(hm) to calculate the constants K and n
in the Qact=K(hm)n.
(vii)
Closing the bypass valve partially open the orificemeter and venturimeter valve so that water
flows through both the tubes. Now determine the flow through both the tubes, add them and
compare that with actual discharge.
1.4
Instrumental Details:
(i)
Measuring tank dimensions 300x300x300 mm.
(ii)
Test pipe diameter 28mm. Venturimeter throat and orifice diameter 14mm.
1.5
Few Questions for Viva Voce:
(i) Can you draw the flow profile of venturimeter and orificemeter?
(ii) What is vena contracta? What is head type flow measurement?
(iii) What is Reynolds number? How the coefficient of discharge varies with Reynolds
number?
(iv) What is contraction coefficient?
(v) Do you know the other types of flow measurement device?
(vi) How could you measure the flow of a river?
1.6
Acknowledgement:
Special thanks to Mechanical Engineering Department, IIT Patna for allowing their
instruments to perform this experiment.
1.7
Reference:
(i) E O Doebelin and D.N. Manik, Measurement systems, Tata McGraw Hill, special Indian edition,
2007.
(ii) B. G. Liptak, Instrument Engineers Handbook: Process Measurement and Analysis, vol 1, 4th
edition, CRC, 2003.
EE 371
Experiment 6
IIT Patna
Objective:
To study the O/P response characteristics of a position control servo system
Apparatus: (i) Power supply (PS150E) (ii) Servo amplifier (SA150D) (iii) DC motor
(DCM150F) (iv) Reduction gear tacho unit (GT150X), (v) Op Amp unit (OA150A) (vi) Input
potentiometer (IP 150H) (vii) Output potentiometer (OP 150H) (viii) Connecting wires.
1.3
Procedure & Experimental Results:
(i)
Connect the +15 and -15 volt with input potentiometer. Take the angular position (from 00 to
1800 both clockwise and anti clockwise direction) vs output voltage readings. Plot the data in
a graph paper and calculate the slope.
(ii)
Do the step (i) for output potentiometer.
(iii)
Now connect the input potentiometer and o/p potentiometer with the Op Amp unit as shown
in Fig 1. Put both the potentiometer at zero angle position and observe the O/P. If the O/P
voltage is not zero adjust the zero setting knob to bring the output voltage at zero. Vary the
input potentiometer position in step keeping the output potentiometer fixed at zero degree.
Plot error angle vs output voltage keeping Op Amp gain at unity.
(iv)
Now connect the position control circuit as shown in Fig 2. Draw the block diagram of the
circuit in control system point of view. Check your circuit with instructor. Set the Op Amp in
unity gain position (position 1). If necessary adjust the zero setting knob.
(v)
Suddenly change the input potentiometer angle approx to 200, 400 etc upto 1400 in both the
directions. Observe the steady state O/P potentiometer readings. Also draw the transient
response available through the optical encoder and computer interface for at least two step
inputs. From the plot calculate the rise time, settling time, peak overshoot, delay-time,
damping ratio, conditional frequency and steady state error.
(vi)
Now vary the input gain as 0.1, 0.2, , 0.9 and repeat the step (v).
(vii)
Put the amplifier gain control knob in position 2. Repeat the step (v). Is there any difference
observe in transient response and steady state response?
(viii) Now apply the eddy current break in three different positions. Repeat the step (v). ). Is there
any difference observe in transient response and steady state response?
(ix)
Calculate the transfer function of the overall system. Observe theoretical step response of the
transfer function and compare with that of obtained through experiment.
1.4
Few Questions for Viva Voce :
(i)
Can you say few applications where servo position control is being used?
(ii)
From the system transfer function, calculate the gain for which the system becomes
unstable?
(iii)
How the eddy current damping works?
(iv)
Can you represent DC motor using state variables?
1.7
Reference:
(i) Katsuhiko Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, Prentice-hall Of India Pvt Ltd, 4th edition, 2007.
(ii) Feedback manual, Modular Servo System MS 150.
EE 371
Experiment 6
IIT Patna
EE 371
Experiment 8
IIT Patna
1.4
Objective:
To model the magnetic levitation system
Design a controller to control the position of a steel ball in magnetic field
Apparatus: (i) Magnetic levitation apparatus with the steel ball, (ii) Data acquisition card
(iii) PC with Matlab and Simulink software etc.
Procedure & Experimental Results:
Prelab Tasks:
(i)
Write down the equation of motion of a steel ball under the magnetic and
gravitational field. Find out the point of equilibrium.
(ii)
Note that the equation governing the motion is nonlinear in nature. Linearise the
equation of motion at equilibrium point. You may take the equilibrium current and
positions are 0.8A and 0.009m respectively. Now find out the open loop transfer
function (take voltage as input and position of the steel ball as output). Now derive
the close loop transfer function with unity gain feedback.
(iii)
Find out the pole zero locations of the transfer function. Also draw root locus and
bode plot of the system. Is the system is stable?
(iv)
Implement the above system in Simulink. Observe the step response of the system.
(v)
Now add a transfer function in the form of (KP + KDS). Take some initial guess of KP
and KD.
(vi)
Plot the root locus and find out the values of KP and KD from desired root location.
Also study frequency response and find out the gain margin and phase margin of the
system.
(vii)
Write down the closed loop transfer function of the overall system. Also draw block
diagram of the system.
(viii) Implement the system with controller in Simulink and observe the step response as
well as response for square wave set point.
(ix)
Now instead of adding a transfer function in the form of (KP + KDS), add the transfer
function in the form of (KP +KI/S + KDS). Repeat the steps (vi) to (viii).
Tasks in Lab
(i)
Put the value of KP + KDS in real time Simulink model. Observe the out put response
for step input and square wave input with three different frequencies and amplitudes.
Plot input output waveforms in a graph paper and also plot the error. What is
maximum value of the error? When it is occurring?
(ii)
Put the value of KP + KI/S + KDS in real time Simulink model. Observe plot the
parameters as described in previous step.
(iii)
Give sine wave as desired position input. Observe and plot the parameters as
described in (i).
Reference:
(i) Katsuhiko Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, Prentice-hall Of India Pvt Ltd, 4th edition, 2007.
(ii) Feedback manual, Magnetic Levitation Control Experiments 33-942S.
EE 371
Experiment 9
IIT Patna
Fig 1