Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
93 views

Numerical Method For Linear Algebra

This document summarizes numerical linear algebra concepts for solving systems of linear equations. 1) It describes common matrix factorizations like LU, Cholesky, and LDLT and how they can be used to solve systems in cubic time. 2) It also discusses solving structured problems faster by exploiting the structure, like using block elimination to solve coupled systems. 3) Methods for underdetermined systems are also covered, explaining how to represent the infinite number of solutions.

Uploaded by

Ashwini Kumar Pal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
93 views

Numerical Method For Linear Algebra

This document summarizes numerical linear algebra concepts for solving systems of linear equations. 1) It describes common matrix factorizations like LU, Cholesky, and LDLT and how they can be used to solve systems in cubic time. 2) It also discusses solving structured problems faster by exploiting the structure, like using block elimination to solve coupled systems. 3) Methods for underdetermined systems are also covered, explaining how to represent the infinite number of solutions.

Uploaded by

Ashwini Kumar Pal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Convex Optimization Boyd & Vandenberghe

9. Numerical linear algebra background

matrix structure and algorithm complexity


solving linear equations with factored matrices
LU, Cholesky, LDLT factorization
block elimination and the matrix inversion lemma
solving underdetermined equations

91

Matrix structure and algorithm complexity


cost (execution time) of solving Ax = b with A Rnn
for general methods, grows as n3
less if A is structured (banded, sparse, Toeplitz, . . . )
flop counts
flop (floating-point operation): one addition, subtraction,
multiplication, or division of two floating-point numbers
to estimate complexity of an algorithm: express number of flops as a
(polynomial) function of the problem dimensions, and simplify by
keeping only the leading terms
not an accurate predictor of computation time on modern computers
useful as a rough estimate of complexity

Numerical linear algebra background

92

vector-vector operations (x, y Rn)


inner product xT y: 2n 1 flops (or 2n if n is large)
sum x + y, scalar multiplication x: n flops
matrix-vector product y = Ax with A Rmn
m(2n 1) flops (or 2mn if n large)
2N if A is sparse with N nonzero elements
2p(n + m) if A is given as A = U V T , U Rmp, V Rnp
matrix-matrix product C = AB with A Rmn, B Rnp
mp(2n 1) flops (or 2mnp if n large)
less if A and/or B are sparse
(1/2)m(m + 1)(2n 1) m2n if m = p and C symmetric

Numerical linear algebra background

93

Linear equations that are easy to solve


diagonal matrices (aij = 0 if i 6= j): n flops
x = A1b = (b1/a11, . . . , bn/ann)
lower triangular (aij = 0 if j > i): n2 flops
x1 := b1/a11
x2 := (b2 a21x1)/a22
x3 := (b3 a31x1 a32x2)/a33
..
xn := (bn an1x1 an2x2 an,n1xn1)/ann
called forward substitution
upper triangular (aij = 0 if j < i): n2 flops via backward substitution
Numerical linear algebra background

94

orthogonal matrices: A1 = AT
2n2 flops to compute x = AT b for general A
less with structure, e.g., if A = I 2uuT with kuk2 = 1, we can
compute x = AT b = b 2(uT b)u in 4n flops
permutation matrices:
aij =

1 j = i
0 otherwise

where = (1, 2, . . . , n) is a permutation of (1, 2, . . . , n)


interpretation: Ax = (x1 , . . . , xn )
satisfies A1 = AT , hence cost of solving Ax = b is 0 flops
example:

0 1 0
A = 0 0 1 ,
1 0 0
Numerical linear algebra background

A1

0 0 1
= AT = 1 0 0
0 1 0
95

The factor-solve method for solving Ax = b


factor A as a product of simple matrices (usually 2 or 3):
A = A 1 A2 Ak
(Ai diagonal, upper or lower triangular, etc)
1 1

A
compute x = A1b = A1
2 A1 b by solving k easy equations
k

A1x1 = b,

A2 x 2 = x 1 ,

...,

Ak x = xk1

cost of factorization step usually dominates cost of solve step


equations with multiple righthand sides
Ax1 = b1,

Ax2 = b2,

...,

Axm = bm

cost: one factorization plus m solves


Numerical linear algebra background

96

LU factorization
every nonsingular matrix A can be factored as
A = P LU
with P a permutation matrix, L lower triangular, U upper triangular
cost: (2/3)n3 flops

Solving linear equations by LU factorization.


given a set of linear equations Ax = b, with A nonsingular.
1. LU factorization. Factor A as A = P LU ((2/3)n3 flops).
2. Permutation. Solve P z1 = b (0 flops).
3. Forward substitution. Solve Lz2 = z1 (n2 flops).
4. Backward substitution. Solve U x = z2 (n2 flops).

cost: (2/3)n3 + 2n2 (2/3)n3 for large n


Numerical linear algebra background

97

sparse LU factorization
A = P1LU P2
adding permutation matrix P2 offers possibility of sparser L, U (hence,
cheaper factor and solve steps)
P1 and P2 chosen (heuristically) to yield sparse L, U
choice of P1 and P2 depends on sparsity pattern and values of A
cost is usually much less than (2/3)n3; exact value depends in a
complicated way on n, number of zeros in A, sparsity pattern

Numerical linear algebra background

98

Cholesky factorization
every positive definite A can be factored as
A = LLT
with L lower triangular
cost: (1/3)n3 flops

Solving linear equations by Cholesky factorization.


given a set of linear equations Ax = b, with A Sn++.
1. Cholesky factorization. Factor A as A = LLT ((1/3)n3 flops).
2. Forward substitution. Solve Lz1 = b (n2 flops).
3. Backward substitution. Solve LT x = z1 (n2 flops).

cost: (1/3)n3 + 2n2 (1/3)n3 for large n


Numerical linear algebra background

99

sparse Cholesky factorization


A = P LLT P T
adding permutation matrix P offers possibility of sparser L
P chosen (heuristically) to yield sparse L
choice of P only depends on sparsity pattern of A (unlike sparse LU)
cost is usually much less than (1/3)n3; exact value depends in a
complicated way on n, number of zeros in A, sparsity pattern

Numerical linear algebra background

910

LDLT factorization
every nonsingular symmetric matrix A can be factored as
A = P LDLT P T
with P a permutation matrix, L lower triangular, D block diagonal with
1 1 or 2 2 diagonal blocks
cost: (1/3)n3
cost of solving symmetric sets of linear equations by LDLT factorization:
(1/3)n3 + 2n2 (1/3)n3 for large n
for sparse A, can choose P to yield sparse L; cost (1/3)n3

Numerical linear algebra background

911

Equations with structured sub-blocks




A11 A12
A21 A22



x1
x2

b1
b2

(1)

variables x1 Rn1 , x2 Rn2 ; blocks Aij Rninj


if A11 is nonsingular, can eliminate x1: x1 = A1
11 (b1 A12 x2 );
to compute x2, solve
1
A
)x
=
b

A
A
(A22 A21A1
12
2
2
21
11 b1
11

Solving linear equations by block elimination.


given a nonsingular set of linear equations (1), with A11 nonsingular.
1
1. Form A1
11 A12 and A11 b1 .
1

2. Form S = A22 A21A1


11 A12 and b = b2 A21 A11 b1 .
3. Determine x2 by solving Sx2 =
b.
4. Determine x1 by solving A11x1 = b1 A12x2.

Numerical linear algebra background

912

dominant terms in flop count


step 1: f + n2s (f is cost of factoring A11; s is cost of solve step)
step 2: 2n22n1 (cost dominated by product of A21 and A1
11 A12 )
step 3: (2/3)n32
total: f + n2s + 2n22n1 + (2/3)n32
examples
general A11 (f = (2/3)n31, s = 2n21): no gain over standard method
#flops = (2/3)n31 + 2n21n2 + 2n22n1 + (2/3)n32 = (2/3)(n1 + n2)3
block elimination is useful for structured A11 (f n31)
for example, diagonal (f = 0, s = n1): #flops 2n22n1 + (2/3)n32

Numerical linear algebra background

913

Structured matrix plus low rank term


(A + BC)x = b
A Rnn, B Rnp, C Rpn
assume A has structure (Ax = b easy to solve)
first write as

A B
C I



x
y

b
0

now apply block elimination: solve


(I + CA1B)y = CA1b,
then solve Ax = b By
this proves the matrix inversion lemma: if A and A + BC nonsingular,
(A + BC)1 = A1 A1B(I + CA1B)1CA1
Numerical linear algebra background

914

example: A diagonal, B, C dense


method 1: form D = A + BC, then solve Dx = b
cost: (2/3)n3 + 2pn2
method 2 (via matrix inversion lemma): solve
(I + CA1B)y = CA1b,

(2)

then compute x = A1b A1By


total cost is dominated by (2): 2p2n + (2/3)p3 (i.e., linear in n)

Numerical linear algebra background

915

Underdetermined linear equations


if A Rpn with p < n, rank A = p,
{x | Ax = b} = {F z + x
| z Rnp}
x
is (any) particular solution
columns of F Rn(np) span nullspace of A
there exist several numerical methods for computing F
(QR factorization, rectangular LU factorization, . . . )

Numerical linear algebra background

916

You might also like