לזכרו של פרופ פוירשטיין
לזכרו של פרופ פוירשטיין
לזכרו של פרופ פוירשטיין
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to describe evidence-based research carried out
in populations related to the field of mental health, based on the theories
and work done by Prof. Reuven Feuerstein. These studies originated from
Hadas-Lidors Dynamic Cognitive Intervention (DCI) approach, which is derived from Feuersteins Structural Cognitive Modifiability theory. DCI is specifically intended for enhancement of therapeutic-based relationships with a
direct emphasis on emotional-related issues and the way they affect cognitive development.
One of the populations in which functional-cognitive abilities may be compromised is the population of people coping with mental disorders, due to effects of the illness and/or medication side effects.
The outlook for people diagnosed with mental illness has improved in the
past several decades due to reasons related to brain research development,
third generation medications and various psychosocial and cognitive treatments. These have allowed those coping with mental illness to achieve
meaningful recovery, manage residual symptoms, and lead productive lives.
Yet additional efforts are needed to consolidate these improvements and
help more people with mental illness to reach these goals.
Due to the negative effects of mental illness, positive communication skills
and abilities may be compromised, whether for those coping with mental illness themselves, or for those providing care for them either professionally or
as family members. In order to enhance learning and cognition, improve
communication and instill hope and meaning for all involved, the DCI approach provides a basis for various interventions related to mental health
that promote resilience, participation and recovery.
DCI incorporates use of Mediated Learning Experiences, exercises from Feuersteins Instrumental Enrichment program, and additional tools developed,
such as reading and writing tasks, utilization of personal picture albums and
Meaningful Interactional Life Episodes (MILEs). The studies reviewed in this
Introduction
Over the past fifty years the field of mental health care has greatly developed.
In the past, mental illness was often associated with neuro-cognitive degeneration and chronic deterioration of cognitive functions and abilities, with no
hope for rehabilitation and recovery. This usually was translated into a focus
on disability and weaknesses, social exclusion, lessened participation and a
lack of independence. For many years those suffering from mental illness did
not receive cognitive therapy, due to the belief that the cognitive impairment
was irreversible, together with the fact that cognitive intervention foundations were based on neuropsychology and therefore applied primarily for
people coping with brain injury (Green et al., 2000).
In recent years there are growing interactions between the fields of mental health and neuroscience research. Current trends in research on brain
plasticity, together with the exponential growth in new technology, show the
brain to be a far more plastic organ than previously thought (Doidge, 2007;
Kleim & Jones, 2008). After injury, the brain is capable of considerable reorganization that forms the basis for functional recovery (Sohlberg & Mateer,
2001). The fact that specific alterations in behaviour are reflected in characteristic functional changes in the brain is currently accepted by biologists
(Kandel, 1998, 2006). Thus, the ideas related to cognitive modifiability expressed by Feuerstein (Feuerstein et al., 1979; Feuerstein et al., 1980), pertaining to structural cognitive changes, are being found to be not just theoretical but are becoming scientifically validated (Hadas-Lidor et al., 2011).
Thanks to the developments in the field of brain research as it relates to
mental illness, together with advances in psycho-pharmacology, new attitudes and approaches that promote recovery, community integration and
rehabilitation are developing. These include psycho-education and psychosocial approaches and programs, cognitive interventions, psychiatric rehabil-
itation approaches and settings. These have brought about a huge change in
the quality of life of many people coping with severe mental health illness
(Lachman &Hadas-Lidor, 2003).
Concurrent with the changes in the mental health field, in the 80s' the
consumers of mental health services started the Recovery movement. The recovery movement has turned into the central approach to interventions in
mental health, primarily within the community (Friedli, 2010). In Recovery,
illness is viewed as a process and journey toward a satisfying and meaningful
life despite the illness, instead of regarding recovery as a cure (Anthony,
1993; Deegan, 1996; Liberman & Kopelowitz, 2005). Recovery places an emphasis on therapeutic relationships, demanding that providers collaborate
closely with each consumer to discover their unique path to healing (Tew et
al., 2011). Recovery is defined as a deeply, personal, unique process of changing one's attitudes, values, feelings, goals, skills and roles. It is a way of living
a satisfying, hopeful and contributing life even with limitations caused by the
illness. Recovery involves the development of new meaning and purpose in
one's life, as one goes beyond the catastrophic effects of mental illness (Anthony, 1993).
Feuerstein and the Recovery movement share common beliefs and concepts, such as the belief in a persons' ability to change, focusing on strengths
and not weaknesses, hope, the importance of experiencing competency. Hadas-Lidor, in the development of DCI combines these entities, both in theory
and practice.
There is a growing body of knowledge that provides evidence that cognition is a good predictor of functional rehabilitation outcomes in schizophrenia (Green et al., 2000). Cognitive interventions, whether in group or individual format, have become one of the central methods of intervention in this
population (Silverstein et al., 2001). The literature provides evidence to the
fact that cognitive interventions are beneficial for the population of the people with severe mental illness (Bellack et al., 2004; Hadas-Lidor et al., 2001;
Kandel, 1998; Kern et al., 2001; Silverstein et al., 2001; Spaulding, 1994).
One of the developments in the field of cognitive interventions in mental
health is based on the theories developed by Feuerstein (Feuerstein, Rand,
Hoffman, & Miller 1980; 2006).
Feuerstein (1980) formulated his theory of Structural Cognitive Modifiability (SCM), which presented the human being as an open system that can
be modified regardless of age and disability status. In general, Feuersteins
hance and bring into awareness meta- cognition by teaching the cognitive
principles and mediation components themselves in order to promote both
occupational and social skills.
In addition to Instrumental Enrichment, various intervention techniques
are activated, such as using family picture albums, reading and writing assignments, one of which is the Meaningful Interactional Life Episode (MILE).
MILEs are used in order to enhance learning and encourage the transfer of
knowledge and communication skills acquired during DCI individual or
group interventions, to participants natural environment. MILEs are real-life
documented verbal interactions experienced and submitted by those receiving DCI. The DCI expert analyses these MILEs and provides feedback to DCI
recipient regarding central components crucial to the development of learning and/or improved communications that are present or lacking within the
MILE (Weiss, 2013).
DCI principles
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The intervention is structured in accordance with the consumers' choices and needs and not in relation to the diagnosis or the aetiology of the
illness.
Throughout the intervention there is a continuous process of discourse
between mediator and person receiving DCI regarding goals, purpose,
progression rate and the intervention methodology.
The DCI involves relating to various life aspects and roles- as long as the
Mediator uses Mediation within the verbal interaction taking place
throughout the intervention.
Meta-cognition is used, as DCI principles and intervention strategies are
shared and explained to person receiving the intervention, following the
belief, which professional tools of trade have to be shared as much as
possible with the person receiving the intervention (Knowledge Translation).
The entire intervention process is based on mediation, therefore, mediation is taught as a unique and separate methodology, to be applied in
every interaction. This entails specialized courses for the teaching of Mediation.
All those involved with the person receiving the intervention are familiarized with Mediation strategies.
7. There is no definitive line drawn between assessment, intervention and
follow-up. They are intertwined throughout the entire process.
8. Highlighting, cognitive enquiry and analysis of experiences of success,
rather than focusing on difficulties and failures. This enables learning
from success and turns success into a model for replication.
9. Clearly defining between emotions, cognition and actions is used to help
understand the central role cognition plays within interactions, as well as
to enable improved cognitive self-control and improved understanding
of others participating in interaction.
10. Coexistence of Competence and Dysfunction- Focus on incorporation of
different characteristics that permanently reside side by side in each and
every one of us, in particular important for persons coping with mental
health illness.
DCI additionally expands Feuersteins approach in relevance to the environmental component. For years, Feuerstein related to the environment as
being dynamic and opposed segregation of persons with special needs. DCI
goes beyond this by focusing on the human component in the environmentparents, family, caregivers and professionals involved in caring for those with
special needs , under the assumption that it is not enough to improve the
persons self-ability to learn, but together with a change in the belief system of
the carer, in his/her ability to have faith in the person under care on a basis of
equality together with acquiring the ability to improve communications by
use of mediation techniques based on Mediated Learning Experience parameters- towards promoting Recovery-change, rehabilitation and integration.
There is a growing body of studies based on DCI principles. Those that focus
on populations of persons coping with mental illness; studies that focus on
family caregivers: and studies that focus on professionals. A number of these
studies are described below.
static form on second copying, second drawing from memory, the rate of
change and the grading of competence at the end of the test. The researchers
conclude that the dynamic form of the ROCF provides a more in-depth understanding of learning propensity and subject's competence. Increasing use
of the dynamic form could guide occupational therapists and other professionals in constructing a better tailored intervention plan for consumers, increase their feeling of competence, encourage them to continue in their efforts and activities and therefore promote their rehabilitation.
of 50 MILEs illuminated the significant role that religious and cultural norms
had in the perceptions of what the participants considered stressors and the
dynamic in the families in regard to these stressors. Four themes were identified: (a) conflicts between religious rituals and the disability; (b) stressors that
stem from the need to maintain the secrecy of familial events in a collectivist
society; (c) stressors that stem from time-related events, such as holidays;
and (d) mothers as a major bearer of the burden of caregiving. The authors
emphasized the importance of relating to cultural factors in family educational programs and interventions, because this may contribute to the potential use and success of mental health services within a population that essentially underutilizes these services. Accruing this knowledge is essential if
therapists want to adapt the methods of interventions in educational programs, such as Keshet, to the needs of parents living in a closed religious collectivist society. The MILEs could also be applied as a means of developing
culturally oriented techniques with other cultural populations and members
of racial/ethnic minority groups that underutilize mental health services because of cultural barriers. In the work of Feuerstein, there is an emphasis on
the adaptations needed for minority populations, such as immigrants from
countries such as Ethiopia and North Africa, stating that we should not regard them as people who lack intelligence, rather as people who are culturally different (Feuerstein, &Richel, 1963).
A comprehensive effectiveness study of Keshet was conducted by Weiss
(2014).
Study objectives were (a) to develop an instrument for structured analysis
of the MILEs (b) to examine the effectiveness of the Keshet course for family
caregiver wellbeing and (c) to develop a "Knowledge Translation" based
model of cognitive educational intervention for family members of persons
coping with mental disorders based on an occupational therapy domain perspective relating to communication and recovery.
Methodology: The first section of this study includes the development of
a tool for the analysis of MILES, the Meaningful Interactional Life Episodes
Evaluation Tool (MILEET). Keshet moderators were the designated population for the tool development study. Their written responses to MILEs were
compared and analysed pre/post use of this newly developed tool.
As Keshet is a complex health intervention, the intervention effectiveness
section of this study utilized a mixed methodology approach. Quantitative
questionnaires relating to family attitudes, problem solving, communication
Findings
The MILEET development resulted in the structuring of a reliable tool for
MILE analysis, yet the use of the MILEET did not evoke a significant improvement in MILE analysis for experienced Keshet moderators. Regarding
the effectiveness outcome study, following Keshet participation, and as compared with the study control condition, quantitative findings pointed to significant changes in participants attitudes regarding knowledge of how to
cope with a mentally ill family member. Participants also reported a significant improvement with regard to objective and subjective burden. Participants and moderators identified a significant positive change in the ability of
participants to cope with the MILEs. Qualitative data analysis revealed three
central themes (1) Keshet is an attempt to go beyond the despair and frustration to improved relationships with self, child and the health system; (2)
Keshet is a means to improve communication empowerment and feelings of
competency and (3)The group leaders meaningful role and effect on learning and promoting recovery and change.
Conclusions
Keshet aids family caregivers in mental health in the development of skills
and attitudes that improve cognitive communication skills and in turn, improves resilience in the caregiving role. This is accomplished with the use of
the MILEs that provide meaningful links between theoretical components
taught and the participants actual experiences. Caregiver resilience is identified as being a meaningful outcome which to date has not received sufficient
attention. The MILEET, developed within the framework of this study, is a re-
liable tool, apparently primarily useful for novice moderators. For the population of family caregivers in mental health, Keshet is an intervention model
that promotes Knowledge Translation that may positively affect public health
and promotion.
Conclusions
Prof. Reuven Feuersteins work and the theories he developed have reached
and are being applied far and beyond the populations he started out working
with. One of these populations, as described in this paper are those coping
with mental health illness. DCI is based on the SCM and MLE theories, together with elements from the recovery vision, an emphasis on emotions and
cognition and meta-cognition as implemented in the profession of occupational therapy. We believe that the DCI principles which integrate these
components can advance people on their Recovery journey.
This paper reviewed studies based on DCI in populations related to the
field of mental health. Three studies were conducted within the population of
persons coping with mental health illness, five studies involved families of
persons coping with mental illness and two studies were carried out with
professionals who provide mental health services.
These studies point to the effectiveness of Dynamic Cognitive Intervention, its' importance for consumers, caregivers and professionals in the field
of mental health, and the broad spectrum with whom this intervention may
be applied. DCI does not focus on illness and illness management. It is rather based on a universal outlook on cognitive modifiability and the use of
mediation for positive communication applications. Regarding the Keshet
intervention for family caregiver's that is based on DCI, it is clear that the
mental health family caregivers needs should be addressed since homebased care is an integral component of all health and social systems. Keshet
is held within settings that are identified within a health and not an illness
perspective (academic setting vs. hospital/clinic). Within this context it is
important to initiate such interventions and encourage family caregivers to
participate in these interventions from the early stages of their coping with
family mental illness. The population of caregivers should be encouraged
and reinforced in their need for support, caring for themselves, and acquiring
practical strategies for improved caring and coping. Public health care providers and program instigators should be made aware of the importance of
these crucial needs.
Additional studies on the use of DCI as a basis for identifying communication patterns and the establishing of effective cognitive communication in
various populations of persons with special needs are warranted.
When Prof' Reuven Feuerstein was asked whether cognitive interventions
would make people happier, he answered "Happiness is in Gods' hands. My
role is to expand people's possibilities and ability to make choices".
References
Anthony, W.A. (1993). Recovery from mental health illness: The guiding vision of
the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychological Rehabilitation
Journal, 16, 1124.
Bellack, A.S., Mueser, K.T., Gingerich, S., & Agresta, J. (2004).Social skills Training
for Schizophrenia. NY London: The Guilford Press.
Deegan, P.E. (1996). Recovery as a journey of the heart. Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Journal, 19(3), 91-97
Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself. Penguin: London.
Feuerstein, R., with Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Feuerstein, R.,withRand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979) The dynamic assessment of
retarded performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Feuerstein, R. &Richel, M. (1963).Children of the Malach: Cultural depravation of
Moroccan children and its meaning for Education. The Jewish Agency, Henrietta Sold Institute, Jerusalem.
Feurstein, R., Rand, Y., &Feurstein, R.S. (2006).You love me!!...Dont accept me as I
am. Revised and enlarged edition. Jerusalem: InternationalCenter for Enhancement of Learning Potential Publications.
Green, M.F., Kern, R.S., Braff, D.L. &Mintz, J. (2000). Neurocognitive Deficits and
Functional Outcome in Schizophrenia: Are We Measuring the Right Stuff?
Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26, 119136.
Hadas-Lidor, N., Katz, N., Tiano, S., Weizman, A.(2001) Effectiveness of Dynamic
Cognitive Intervention in Rehabilitation of Clients with Schizophrenia. Clinical Rehabilitation: 15 (4), August 2001.349-359
Hadas-Lidor, N., & Weiss, P. (2007), An academic diploma program as a lever for
personal and professional growth and empowerment. The Israel Journal Of
Occupational Therapy, 16,3, E61-E74.
Hadas-Lidor, N., Naveh, E. & Weiss, P. (2006). From Therapist to Teacher: Development of Professional Identity and the Issue of Mediation. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 6,1, 100-116.
Hadas Lidor, N., Hasdai, A., Jarus, T., "KESHET" advancement participation and
communication course for parents and caregivers for cognitive communication Israel Journal of Occupational Therapy: 15 (1) February 2006, 31-46,
(Heb.)
Hadas-Lidor, N., Weiss, P. & Kozulin, A. (2011). Dynamic Cognitive Intervention:
Application in Occupational Therapy. In N. Katz (Ed.) Cognition, Occupation,
and Participation Across the Life Span (pp.323350). Bethesda, MD: AOTA.
Kleim, J., & Jones, T. (2008). Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity:
Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51 225-239.
Liberman, R.P., &Kopelowitz, A. (2005). Recovery from Schizophrenia: A concept
in search of research. Psychiatric Services, 56, 735742.
Rehabilitation of the Mentally Disabled in the Community Law, 2000 . Jerusalem,
Ministry
of
Justice,
2000.
Available
at
www.old.health.gov.il/Download/pages/lawENG040409_2.pdf
Silverstein SM1, Menditto AA, Stuve P. (2001) Shaping attention span: an operant
conditioning procedure to improve neurocognition and functioning in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin.;27(2):247-57.
World Health Organization. (2000). Home-based long-term care: Report of a WHO
study group.(Technical report series 898).Geneva: Author. Retrieved May 4,
20011, from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_898.pdf
Tew, J., Ramon, S., Slade, M., Bird, V., Melton, J., & Le Boutillier, C. (2011). Social
factors and recovery from mental health difficulties: A review of the evidence.
British Journal of Social Work [June]118
Friedli, L. (2010). Proceedings of the 2010 Refocus on Recovery conference, Institute
of
Psychiatry,
London.
Retrieved
http://www.researchintorecovery.com/conference/materials.html
1-2-11
from
accessed