Small Hybrid Solar Power System: Ernciency,-Cost, Optimizï 3: 1liijil - Ffiil"I?Ffit, T,1,0"., Orenergy Sysrems
Small Hybrid Solar Power System: Ernciency,-Cost, Optimizï 3: 1liijil - Ffiil"I?Ffit, T,1,0"., Orenergy Sysrems
Small Hybrid Solar Power System: Ernciency,-Cost, Optimizï 3: 1liijil - Ffiil"I?Ffit, T,1,0"., Orenergy Sysrems
optimiz;3:;1liijil*-ffiil"i?ffiT,T,1,0".,
orEnergy
sysrems
First
IntemationalConferenceon Applied Thermodynamics
(68/4)
Introduction
Drawbacks of solar power generationare:
the low density of solar radiation requiring
large collector areas,
high investmentcostspartly due to the useof
specific technologies produced in small
seriesand,
the lack of reliability and the fluctuations of
the solar supply, which are highly dependent
on the meteorologicalconditions.
Recent technological progress opens new
perspectivesfor Integrated Solar Fossil Cycle
Systems(ISFCS). In the context of increasing
global environmental concerns these offer the
possibility to acceleratefossil fuel substitution
(even if only partial), and therefore reduce
emissions, while ensuring adequate power
availability(Favrat,1995;Allani et al., 1996).
. ISTANBUL347
ECOS'o1
. ISTANBUL
348 ECOS'o1
2,
Figurel.
unit
. ISTANBUL34S
ECOS'o1
.1
- ISTANBUL
350 ECOS'o1
E xperi mentalresul ts
aa
a
aa
J-
A A
()
o
o
i!
3
35
45
efficiency
l3
t2
^:;
rl
3 r 0
l , l 9
o ooo
,
99
v 9
q?
9
Net efficiencY
aa
9v
6
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Heat at evaporator[kW]
50
55
60
65
Heat [kW]
EcrgE-ffirfenT
45
*J+
* { F
r*zvf t
v E
+F
i B q o Effcienqy
+
o
r'E
ifi 3s
o
o
.E'
\
{
% B
.P
i g0
17
\
\
N et Efficiency
UJ
25L
30
Heararepporetol{tcWl
Figure 7. Exergt efficienciesof the superposed
ORCsfor various supply heat rates.
Note that the efficiency decreaseat low supply
heat rates can be explainedby the losseslinked
to the inadaptedpressuresat the expanderof the
bottomingcycle (seeFigure 8). This is due to the
fact that, for simplicity, the two generatorsare
directly connected to the grid without any
variablespeedelectronics.This simple and cheap
approachimposesgliding pressureswith variable
loads. Moreover the high amount of oil mixed
with the refrigerant increases the boiling
temperaturein the end phase of evaporation
moving the pinch point there.This phenomenon
is well known in heatpumpsand is accompanied
by a significant drop in heat transfer with a
coresponding drop of the evaporationpressure.
This is particularly negative at the evaporatorcondenser where the resulting temperature
differenceis excessive.Solutionsto improvethis
sifuation are: change of evaporator-condenser
type (falling filrn shall-in-tubeinstead of plate
evaporator), introduction of expander speed
regulation,separationof the oil at the discharge
. ISTANBUL351
ECOS'01
cf tire l-=*i"toming
cycle with a separateoil pump,
r ic .
Neveitiislcss these preliminary tests on the
supsr[josedcyclcs allowed a ciemonstnation
of the
: obustne:s of the present onrcpt, providing
sriii i:rsight n thc confrol etraracteristics
ri:quir',:Jlbr all ;r;l-cnrulcl
olrciati<;nof the power
piarLt.
t0
68
66
f
c
q.)
62
6n
(N
58
c)
l
-\6
(:
CJ
X
LU
54
6 Turbine
4, lliiroineBT
.*
Rend. con'ol
52
5rl
PR/t,Ri[-]
Electrlc output vs
Hert Source Tempcreture
wilh motor
=
ts
4
. ISTAT{BUL
S5? f;C(fS'{J1
f
*
4
t
11 0
120
130
| j0
140
160
l7o
Hcat SourccTcnpcraurrc('C)
-I
ou$rtt tu tlA
Ellc
I
I
rl ! r+ 1l r
It
"b
4*
\^
r4
-
or'clr
ooo *\
ta{E
.r
o o
{l l ort r+ 1}+
T
9F
tD
rrr
tG
,G
rryU! *t1111orl!Yl
Figure I0: Electic power produced by the
expanders(with or without engine
These initial points are first attemptsto validate
the concept, which, so far, meets the early
expectations.
4.
t20/t25
8
3.4
28 (evaporator)
1.3
Conclusions
LT Cycle
Engine
Electrical
power12,8kWe
I 1.5
5
+ l8
25 (recuperator)
(preheater)
2.5
Heatratefrom combustion
gasesl2 kwth
Exchangerinletgas
temperature580"C
Nomenclature
HSPS Hybrid SolarPower Sysrem
ISCCS IntegratedSolarCombinedCycle
System
ISFPP IntegratedSolar-FossilPowerPlants
PAESI ProjetPiloted'Amnagemenr
EnergtiqueSolaire tntgr
SEGS SolarElectricGeneratingSystem
SPS
SolarPower Svstem
References
Allani Y., Favrat D. Concept Global d'une
Nouvelle CentraleSolaire Cycle CombinDual
Fuel.Entropie1991,;YoL 27,No. I 64/165.
Allani Y., Favrat D., von Spakovsky M. CO2
mitigation through the use of hybrid solarcombined cycles. Third Int. Conf. on Carbon
Dioxide Removal Technologies (ICCDR-3),
MIT, Cambridge,USA. 1996.
Buck R., Goebel O., Koehne R., Tamme R.,
Trieb F. Advanced solar/fossilcombined power
plants.Proc. of the Int. Energy and Environment
Conf, pp.423-434,Changhai,1998.
Favrat
D.
Concept
de
centrale
lectrothermosolaire
alpine. CISBAT'95. EPFL.
I 995.
Goswami O.Y. Solar Energy and the
Environment, Int. Conferenceon Energy Systems
and EcologyASME,pp.77-85, Poland.1995.
Kane M., Favrat D, Approche de conception et
d'optimisationde centralesolaire intgre cycle
combin inspire de la mthode du pincement
(part I and II). Int. J. Therm. Sci..1999.Vol 38,
No 6: pp 501-524.
Kane M., Favrat D et al. Thermoeconomic
analysisof advancedsolar-fossilcombinedcycle
power plants, ECOS2000, accepted for
publication
in
Int.
J.
Applied
of
Thermodynamics,2001.
Acknowledgments
. ISTANBUL353
ECOS'o1
. ISTANBUL
354 ECOS'o1