Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 109 views

    Quaker Chemical Presentation

    Uploaded by

    npskier205
    The document compares the machinability of compacted graphite iron and two types of ductile iron when machined with three different coolants. Tool wear was measured after successive cuts to examine the effectiveness of the coolants. For the 80-55-06 ductile iron and CGI, the Quakercool 7020 coolant resulted in the slowest tool wear over time. For the 65-45-12 ductile iron, the Quakercool 7020-2.5 coolant led to the longest tool life based on analysis of tool wear graphs. Regression analysis supported that 7020 provides the best performance for 80-55-06 and CGI, while 7020-2.5 is best for 65-45-12

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Quaker Chemical Presentation

    Uploaded by

    npskier205
    109 views23 pages
    The document compares the machinability of compacted graphite iron and two types of ductile iron when machined with three different coolants. Tool wear was measured after successive cuts to examine the effectiveness of the coolants. For the 80-55-06 ductile iron and CGI, the Quakercool 7020 coolant resulted in the slowest tool wear over time. For the 65-45-12 ductile iron, the Quakercool 7020-2.5 coolant led to the longest tool life based on analysis of tool wear graphs. Regression analysis supported that 7020 provides the best performance for 80-55-06 and CGI, while 7020-2.5 is best for 65-45-12

    Original Description:

    Presentation of Information for IE 480W.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document compares the machinability of compacted graphite iron and two types of ductile iron when machined with three different coolants. Tool wear was measured after successive cuts to examine the effectiveness of the coolants. For the 80-55-06 ductile iron and CGI, the Quakercool 7020 coolant resulted in the slowest tool wear over time. For the 65-45-12 ductile iron, the Quakercool 7020-2.5 coolant led to the longest tool life based on analysis of tool wear graphs. Regression analysis supported that 7020 provides the best performance for 80-55-06 and CGI, while 7020-2.5 is best for 65-45-12

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    109 views23 pages

    Quaker Chemical Presentation

    Uploaded by

    npskier205
    The document compares the machinability of compacted graphite iron and two types of ductile iron when machined with three different coolants. Tool wear was measured after successive cuts to examine the effectiveness of the coolants. For the 80-55-06 ductile iron and CGI, the Quakercool 7020 coolant resulted in the slowest tool wear over time. For the 65-45-12 ductile iron, the Quakercool 7020-2.5 coolant led to the longest tool life based on analysis of tool wear graphs. Regression analysis supported that 7020 provides the best performance for 80-55-06 and CGI, while 7020-2.5 is best for 65-45-12

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 23

    Comparative Analysis of Ductile Metals vs Compacted Graphite Iron Under Machining Conditions: Final Report

    Quaker Chemical, Group 1


    -Talal Al-Quassar -Bethany Ford -Robert Conrad -Philip Jaunzemis

    -Patrick Reilly

    4/16/2013

    Background
    The objective of this project is to test the machinability of Compacted Graphite Iron (CGI) and two ductile metals (80-55-06 and 65-45-12) with the use of three coolants: Quakercool 3750, Quakercool 7020-CG, and Quakercool 7020-CG-2.5
    The cutting tools (Kennametal CNMA KCK05) were used as the test for machinability Tool wear was measured after a certain number of cuts to examine how well the coolants were working

    Cutting Parameters Ductile


    1300 Surface Feet Per Minute
    Right Hand Turning Tool Varying Level Cuts

    5 Levels (separated by 2 inches) 1.6 inches in depth per level.

    Ductile 80-55-06 7020 Coolant

    1st Level 10 completed Passes 0.347 mm Tool Wear

    5th Level 50 completed Passes 0.714 mm Tool Wear

    Ductile 80-55-06 7020 2.5 Coolant

    1st Level 10 completed Passes 0.362 mm Tool Wear

    5th Level 50 completed Passes 0.861 mm Tool Wear

    Ductile 80-55-06 3750 Coolant

    1st Level 10 completed Passes 0.297 mm Tool Wear

    5th Level 50 completed Passes 0.823 mm Tool Wear

    Ductile 65-45-12 3750 Coolant

    2nd Level 20 completed Passes 0.293 mm Tool Wear

    5th Level 50 completed Passes 0.659 mm Tool Wear

    Ductile 65-45-12 7020 Coolant

    2nd Level 20 completed Passes 0.278 mm Tool Wear

    5th Level 50 completed Passes 0.636 mm Tool Wear

    Ductile 65-45-12 7020 2.5 Coolant

    2nd Level 20 completed Passes 0.312 mm Tool Wear

    5th Level 50 completed Passes 0.636 mm Tool Wear

    Cutting Parameters CGI


    1300 Surface Feet Per Minute
    Right Hand Turning Tool Scale removal process:

    Machines off up to 7 inches of the surface. Machines down to 5.645 inches in diameter.
    Varying Level Cuts

    9 Levels (separated by 0.5 inches) 0.08 inches in depth per level.

    CGI 7020 Coolant

    Level 20 completed Passes 0.324 mm Tool Wear


    4th

    9th Level 45 completed Passes 0.454 mm Tool Wear

    CGI 7020 2.5 Coolant

    4th Level 20 completed Passes 0.335 mm Tool Wear

    9th Level 45 completed Passes 0.450 mm Tool Wear

    CGI 3750 Coolant

    4th Level 20 completed Passes 0.301 mm Tool Wear

    9th Level 45 completed Passes 0.480 mm Tool Wear

    Microstructure

    CGI Bulk Material at 20x

    65-45-12 Bulk Material at 20x

    80-55-06 Bulk material at 20x

    CGI

    CGI 7020 Coolant at 20x

    CGI 7020-2.5 Coolant at 20x

    CGI 3750 Coolant at 20x

    80-55-06

    7020 Coolant at 50x

    3750 Coolant at 50x

    7020-2.5 Coolant at 50x

    65-45-12

    7020-2.5 Coolant at 50x

    7020 Coolant at 50x

    3750 Coolant at 50x

    Tool Wear by Pass 80-55-06

    Tool Wear by Pass 65-45-12

    Tool Wear by Pass CGI

    Analysis
    It can be seen from the graphs presented that, although tool wear values seem similar, there is a difference in which section of the tool curve the values are arriving at
    7020, in terms of the graphs, is wearing the slowest over time since it is in the plateau phase for both the 80-55-06 and the CGI 7020-2.5 wears slower for the 65-45-12 than both the 3750 and 7020

    Regression Analysis
    Regression Equation: y = 0.766 - 0.156x1 - 0.338x2 + 0.0527x3 + 0.0477x4

    Predictor Constant x1 x2

    Coefficient 0.76589 -0.15567 -0.338

    SE Coefficient 0.03218 0.03525 0.03525

    T 23.8 -4.42 -9.59

    P 0 0.012 0.001

    x3
    x4

    0.05267
    0.04767

    0.03525
    0.03525

    1.49
    1.35

    0.21
    0.248

    Conclusions and Recommendations


    It can be seen from the graphs above that Quakercool 7020 will have the longest tool life for the 80-55-05 ductile iron and CGI
    Additionally, the 7020-2.5 will have the longest tool life based off of the graph for 65-45-12 This is based on the idea that these lubricants are not yet in the final phase of tool life as compared to the other coolants in their respective categories

    You might also like