PWC Basics of Mining 6 Som A Future of Mining
PWC Basics of Mining 6 Som A Future of Mining
PWC Basics of Mining 6 Som A Future of Mining
com
Agenda
GeologicalConcepts MiningMethods MineralProcessingMethods MineWasteManagement MiningandMoney AFutureofMining
Somedifferentconcepts
PwC
AFutureofMining
2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Antamina Northparkes New Afton Minto
PwC
AFutureofMining
PwC
AFutureofMining
70.5%
6.8% 9.47% 7%
This is the average from the annual reports of five mining companies in 2005. Mining companies have a lot of their balance sheet tied up in physical assets. This affects return on equity and return on invested capital.
PwC
AFutureofMining
Creating value
ReturnonEquity
RevenuesCosts Assets
UsualapproachtoincreaseRoE istoreduceoperatingcosts
PwC
AFutureofMining
Mine Automation
Why?Toreducecosts.Alsosafer Possible,inprinciple,toautomateanypartoftheminecycle moreefficientuseofassetsandlabor Teleoperation:
teleoperatedLHDs,threedrills,oneoperatoraboveground somesuccessatVale(formerlyINCO)minesinSudbury,Ontario
Autonomoustrucksandshovels:
BHPandRioTinto forapplicationtocoalandironoremines
PwC
AFutureofMining
PwC
AFutureofMining
10
www.canadianminingjournal.com
PwC AFutureofMining 11
PwC
AFutureofMining
12
RioTintosWestAngeles ironmine,Australia
PwC
AFutureofMining
14
Roadheader
PwC
AFutureofMining
15
PwC
AFutureofMining
16
Notreally,ifcomparisonsmadeto otherindustries
PwC
AFutureofMining
17
Industryfocus
Capital productivity
With existing technology it is possible to find ways of using assets more efficiently or to use less of them.
PwC
AFutureofMining
18
Mine
Mill
Currentparadigm metal
the wall Thesubjectofalot ofresearch Wasteore Existing technologies separationatface oratpitwall Concentrate tosurface metal
PwC
AFutureofMining
19
Ore and waste minerals often have different optical properties (i.e., they respond to a particular kind of light differently), different electrical conductivities, and different densities. Thus ore and waste minerals will reflect a particular kind of light differently. In the presence of an electrical current, one will resist the current (typically the waste) and the other will pass the current. If a dense medium is mixed with the ore, the lighter minerals (typically the waste minerals) will float to the top. Thus each of these differences in properties can be used to separate the two types of minerals.
PwC
AFutureofMining
20
New technologies
metal
PwC
AFutureofMining
21
DOWENEEDMACHINES?
PwC
AFutureofMining
22
PwC
AFutureofMining
23
PwC
AFutureofMining
24
PwC
AFutureofMining
25
Nickelmine wasterock
Plantnickelaccumulators
PwC
AFutureofMining
26
PwC
AFutureofMining
27
ForavideoofanAussiefindinganuggetsee www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5nv1lcbN54
AFutureofMining 28
Chemicalaccretion crystallizationfromsolution
Butgoldisnotthatreactive(rememberitsanoblemetal) Wheresthewater?Howwoulditgetintosolution?
Theremustbeanotherway.
PwC
AFutureofMining
29
Looks like goldencrusted bacteria white arrows show cell wall structure Genetic analysis of biofilms on gold showed evidence of bacteria
(JustliketheydoDNAanalysisonCSI)
Source: Reith et al, 2006. Biomineralization of gold: Biofilms on bacterioform gold. Science, 313: 233236
PwC
AFutureofMining
30
goldparticle
PwC
AFutureofMining
31
PwC
AFutureofMining
32
Carbon source
Metalsulfides precipitate
PwC AFutureofMining 33
Sucrose+acid+sulphate+water hydrogensulphide+carbonicacid C12H22O11 +12H+ +6SO42 +H2O 6H2S(aq)+12H2CO3(aq) Metalion+hydrogensulphide metalsulphide+hydrogenion Me2+ +H2S(aq) MeS(solid)+2H+
Acarbonsourceisnotusuallypresent SRBaredormant. Asimplecarbonsource:addsugar
PwC
AFutureofMining
34
PwC
AFutureofMining
35
ZnS
SRBbiofilm
PwC
AFutureofMining
36
Remediation by SRBs
Seewww.bioteq.com
PwC
AFutureofMining
37
PwC
AFutureofMining
38
PwC
AFutureofMining
39
Electronicandmetalscrap
Contaminated water
Notyettried
METALS
Demonstratedat labscale
Feasible
PwC
AFutureofMining
40
The idea of recovering metals from such sources using microbes might seem crazy, but really the only major barrier is our poor understanding of the interaction between metals and microbes. The amounts of valuable metals in these sources vary, but could be significant in the case of metal scrap. Metals are already being recovered from some contaminated waters. There are obvious practical problems with dealing with a hydrothermal zone, but the temperatures are not too high. Orderofmagnitude estimates of bacterial oxidation in one fracture at the Morenci mine in Arizona demonstrated that a few kg of thiobacilli could leach between 0.14 0.87 t of Cu annually. (See Enders et al, 2006. The role of bacteria in the supergene environment of the Morenci porphyry copper deposit, Greenlee County, Arizona. Economic Geology, 101:5970) Experiments have shown that bacteria and fungi grown in the presence of finegrained electronic scrap lead to acid formation and leaching of metals such as copper, tin, aluminum, lead and zinc. (See Brandl H, Bosshard R, Wegmann M, 2001. Computermunching microbes: metal leaching from electronic scrap by bacteria and fungi. Hydrometallurgy, 59:319326.)
PwC
AFutureofMining
41
metalscrap
biological agents
tailingsand minewaste
PwC
AFutureofMining
42
PwC
AFutureofMining
43
orebody
Thispictureisnottoscale
PwC
AFutureofMining
44
THE END
PwC
AFutureofMining
45