Economic Reforms: Kirit Jain Roll No:14
Economic Reforms: Kirit Jain Roll No:14
Economic Reforms: Kirit Jain Roll No:14
ECONOMIC REFORMS
DEFINATION
Reform means the improvement or amendment of what is wrong, corrupt, unsatisfactory, etc. The use of the word in this way emerges in the late 1700s and is believed to originate from Christopher Wyvills Association movement which identified Parliamentary Reform as its primary aim. In India, at least for the past three years, and arguably for much longer, such an approach has proved impossible. While the economy grew fast, politicians both national and regionalpreferred to argue about spending revenues rather than promoting growth. Each time Manmohan Singh, the prime minister, or his supporters, tried to raise an economic reform, such as allowing foreign supermarkets on to Indian soil, the political rage grew intolerable from opposition parties and the governments own allies. Mr Singh, timid, elderly and without robust backing from his party chief, Sonia Gandhi, would then back down. Thus Indias way of promoting reforms has had to be different. Getting any political backing for them has instead required a sharply slowing economygrowth is now down to nearer 5% a year, from a peak of 10%investors who refuse to spend, a grim fiscal position and a host of other alarming economic signs. And rather than announce changes piecemeal, the government of Mr Singh has gone for a big bang, a rush of reforms. The political reaction could be severe: but his boldness is both welcome and overdue. On September 13th came an announcement of a small, but politically important, reduction in diesel subsidies. Through state-owned firms the government has long kept the price of diesel artificially low. But as market prices have soared, the subsidy bill has exploded, helping to turn a bad fiscal situation into a dreadful one. India has been set to miss, by a mile, its deficit targets. The 12% increase in the price of diesel that Indian drivers (and those with generators) are now enduring will be politically difficult, but it is
essential. It was the better-off who gained most from costly fuel subsidies, while the fiscal problems hurt the economy as a whole.
RECENT REFORMS
MUTUAL FUND REFORM
Investments in mutual funds will get simpler and safer-- but a bit costlier in some cases-starting on Monday as the industry is set to implement some wide-ranging reforms by market regulator Sebi. Among various reform measures taken by Sebi (Securities and Exchange Board of India), the fund houses will have to make more disclosures in the interest of investors. They also have to shift to the one plan per scheme model, moving away from the present practice of cluttering one scheme with numerous plans. At the same time, fund houses will be able to charge their investors a little bit more as incentive for expanding to small cities, but would also have to set aside a small portion of their assets for investor education and awareness. The changes in mutual fund regulations were approved by Sebi's board in its last meeting on August 16 and have been notified over the past few days. Now, these would come into effect from tomorrow, October 1. As per the notifications, the fund houses might charge investment and advisory fee on their schemes, which would have to be fully disclosed in the offer document. In case of a fund of funds scheme, the total expenses of levied on the scheme would be capped at 2.50 per cent of the daily net assets of the scheme. In addition to the total expenses already levied on schemes, Sebi would allow the fund houses to levy brokerage and transaction costs, which is incurred for the purpose of execution of trade and is included in the cost of investment, with a ceiling of 0.12 per cent in case of cash market and 0.05 per cent in case of derivatives transactions. Besides, mutual funds can charge additional expenses of up to 0.30 per cent of daily net assets, if the new inflows from places other than top-15 cities are 30 per cent of the gross new inflows in the scheme, or are 15 per cent of the average assets under management (year to date) of the scheme, whichever is higher. The expenses charged under these clauses would have to be utilized for distribution expenses incurred for bringing inflows from such cities, and the amount incurred as expense on account of inflows from such cities would have to be credited back to the scheme in case the said inflows are redeemed within a period of one year. Among other measures, the fund houses would have to calculate the Net Asset Value
(NAV) of the scheme on daily basis and publish the same in at least two daily newspapers with nation-wide circulation. Also, any exit load charged by the fund houses would have to be credited to back to the scheme.
pulled down the growth rate to 6.7 percent in 2008-09. It was 8.4 percent in the last two financial years.
of around $ 650 billion by the year 2015. The latest decision of Indian Government is to boost the growth in retail, further more. According to percipient and discerning economists, the organized retail sector of India has potential to grow at the rate of over 15% every year, especially after this visionary decision of Indian Government. Currently contributing to about 15% of the national GDP of India, the Indian retail sector is expected to entice huge FDI ranging from $2.5 - 3 billion in the next five year, after this liberalizing and visionary decision of Indian Government. Foreign investors, retailers, and companies of the world over, including the Wal-Mart of USA, Metro of Germany, Carrefour of France, Tesco of UK, etc., are now fully free and well-facilitated to make their majority stake investments in the multi-brand retail sector of India, for bright and promising future. The significant recommendations of the latest FDI liberalization policies of India, in multi-brand retail sector, are the following: The minimum level of FDI in multi-brand retail sector will be worth $ 100 million Supermarkets are allowed in only those cities of India whose population is at least 1 million At least 50% of the total investment will be made on the Back-end Infrastructure And, at least 30% of their goods and products will be procured from the local companies and industries.
of India is expected to grow with a rate of over 10% every year. The foreign direct investment in the single-brand and multi-brand retail sectors is hoped to reach the level of US $ 2.5-3 billion, in the next five years. However, the foreign single-brand retailers will have to procure at least 30% of their products and goods from the local or domestic industries and companies, to do business in India. Providing well-rounded, perfect, and swift legal help and services for foreign direct investment in India in its diverse sectors, we are well-equipped to offer legal services for FDI in the retail sector of India, under both the categories of single-brand retail and multi-brand retail. Here, it may be noted that in the multi-brand retail sector, the permitted level of FDI is up to 51% only, according to the latest governmental declaration.
number of air travelers at domestic and international levels, which in turn, will promote further growth and prosperity in the aviation sector of India.
INSURANCE The Cabinet on 4TH October 2012 approved a Bill seeking to increase in the FDI cap in insurance from 26 per cent to 49 percent. The insurance regulator has backed the move. The announcement has been welcomed by the industry, which has been struggling to raise capital for a while. "The FDI increase to 49 per cent is essential for this capitalintensive industry that requires long-term investments. It will encourage more participation of foreign partners in insurance firms and lead to product development and innovation," says T R Ramachandran, CEO and MD, Aviva India. The four public sector general insurance companies - National Insurance, New India Assurance, Oriental Insurance and United India Insurance - along with General Insurance Corporation, the reinsurer, will also be permitted to raise capital from the market. However, the government's holding will not fall below 51 per cent.
PENSION FUND:
The government has allowed overseas companies to own upto 26% in pension funds. While talking about the proposed FDI cap for pension funds, Dhirendra Swarup, Former Chairman, Pension Fund Regulatory and Devlopment Authority (PFRDA), said that the move will bring in greater fund management expertise and will bring in competition. The consumer is going to gain to a large extent. However, investment norms will have to be reinvested, he pointed out.
Regulations. If set up as a company, the IDF would be structured as a Non-Banking Finance Company (NBFC) and will be under the regulatory oversight of RBI. Guidelines with enabling provisions have already been issued by the Reserve Bank of India and SEBI. An IDF-NBFC would issue either rupee or dollar denominated bonds and invest only in debt securities of Public Private Partnership projects which have a buy-out guarantee and have completed at least one year of commercial operations. Such projects are expected to be viewed as low-risk investments and would, therefore, be attractive for risk-averse insurance and pension funds.