Assessment of Water Quality of Hand-Dug Wells in Zaria LGA of Kaduna State, Nigeria
Assessment of Water Quality of Hand-Dug Wells in Zaria LGA of Kaduna State, Nigeria
Assessment of Water Quality of Hand-Dug Wells in Zaria LGA of Kaduna State, Nigeria
: 2319 1805
Assessment of Water Quality of Hand-Dug Wells in Zaria LGA of Kaduna State, Nigeria
By Samuel Yakubu
Department of Geography, Osun State University, Okuku Campus, Nigeria
----------------------------------------------------ABSTRACT--------------------------------------------This study assessed the water quality of some hand-dug wells in Zaria Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria. Water samples were collected from eight (8) different wells at strategic positions and determined to ascertain how safe the water is for directly human consumption without treatment. The physical and chemical parameters assessed include temperature, pH, total hardness, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), nitrate, manganese, iron, copper, zinc, lead and nickel. The result revealed high variation between the WHO standard for potable water and the obtained values. The implication is that water from most wells in the study area is not in any way safe nor suitable for direct human consumption. Closeness of wells to refuse dumpsites was blamed for the increase levels of concentration of pollutants. To avoid further pollution of groundwater, the study therefore recommends that the site for well should be at least 30m away from source of contamination most especially refuse dumpsite, the surrounding environment of the existing wells should be kept clean and tidy to avoid or reduce contaminations, disinfection of wells water by chlorination and continuous monitoring to determine any change in the level of pollution at the sources.
www.theijes.com
The IJES
Page 1
II.
METHODOLOGY
The study area The study area is Zaria which lies on latitudes 11 07N and 12 00N, and longitude 07 44E and 8 00E. Located at a distance of about 962 kilometers from the Atlantic Ocean, it is about 80 kilometers from Kaduna (the state capital). Zaria lies at a height of about 700 metres above sea level and is part of the Hausa High Plains of the northern Nigeria. The area falls within the tropical wet-dry climate and experiences two distinct seasons namely; the wet and dry seasons which are caused by the movement of the Inter-Tropical Discontinuity (ITD) under the influence of two major air masses namely the tropical continental (cT) and the tropical maritime (mT). It has a mean annual rainfall of about 800mm, concentrated in a wet season between April and October (Yakubu, 2009). The temperature is high throughout the year, with the monthly mean rising from January (21 0C) and attaining a maximum in April (290C). A decade mean annual temperature (1999-2008) is 26oC (Yakubu, 2009). Zaria is drained majorly by Galma River with three other rivers as its tributaries which are River Kubanni, Shika and Saye. Data collection and Analysis Water samples were collected from eight (8) wells (w1-w8) in households at specific locations. The wells were basically considered as of small, medium and large sizes given the common sizes of wells in most homes in the study area. A small plastic bottle of one (1) litre capacity rinsed with distilled water was used to collect water samples. Water sample collected from each well was taken to the laboratory for analysis the same day for the following parameters: temperature, pH, total hardness, BOD, nitrate, copper, iron, manganese, zinc, lead and nickel using standard laboratory techniques. The analysis was carried out at the Centre for Energy Research and Training (CERT), Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria. The results obtained were compared with the secondary data gotten from publications of the World Health Organization (WHO) Standard to ascertain conformity with the national and international guidelines. Results and Discussion From the analysis of the samples, variations in the levels of both physical and chemical concentration were observed. The values of each of the parameters examined from well 1 to well 8 are tabulated in table 1. However, Table 2 which is the summary of data in Table 1 shows the variation in terms of range, mean level of concentration of each parameter examined, WHO standard and deviation from the standards. From Table 2, the results show that most parameters tested were either above or below the international and national standards with the exception of pH, which fall within the range. The mean value of temperature for instance is 25.3 which is above the WHO standard. A high temperature causes thermal pollution and adversely affects aquatic life. More so, a rising water temperature lowers the viscosity of water and so causes faster settling of solid particles. Total hardness has the mean concentration of 197.9mg/l higher than the 100mg/l WHO standard. This excess according to Appello and Postma (2005) causes cataract, diuretics disease and diarrhea in man and scouring disease among livestock.
www.theijes.com
The IJES
Page 2
Note: W = well Table 2: Suitability of drinking water quality Parameters Range Mean WHO Standard (2004) 23.5 6.5 - 8 500 10 1.5 0.4 0.3 1.0 5.0 0.01 0.02 Deviation
Temperature pH Total Hardness BOD Nitrate Manganese Iron Copper Zinc Lead Nickel
22.6 - 8.0 6.8 8.0 125 - 302 12 - 21 1.2 2.0 0.422.33 0.75-5.25 0.82-4.30 0.18-2.11 0.04-1.0 0.02-0.12
25.3 7.45 197.9 17.5 1.63 1.43 2.85 2.15 1.13 0.33 0.06
+1.81 +0.95, -0.55 -302.3 +7.5 +0.13 +1.03 +2.55 +1.12 -3.88 +0.32 +0.04
Field observation, the contamination or high levels of heavy metal content observed in the selected wells could be attributed to the indiscriminate dumping of refuse around most of the wells, which could leached down from the surface. Several other studies such as Akungbo (1990); Ariziki (19991), Gideon (1999), (Folorunsho, 2010) revealed that refuse dumps distance is not the only factor responsible for the level of concentration of pollutants in wells. Other factors such as nature of the geologic material developed on the poorly weathered crystalline basement complex rocks, poor drainage and sewage systems, discharge from industries and application of fertilizers could also be responsible for the level of pollution in the well water. The health risk with manifesting symptoms of acute toxicity is only associated with known exposure and or ingestion. While heavy metals reaching toxic levels have health risks associated with it, some symptoms associated with this health risk are experienced by some consumers and it is an indication that ill-health affect efficiency in one way or the other (Yakubu and Baba, 2010). Similarly, Okechukwu et al (2012) reported rampant cases of water borne diseases like typhoid fever in some hospitals in Nsukka metropolis. It is obvious that this common resource - water brings with it the blessing of continual survival but where carelessly handled is accompanies with it a silent epidermic, capable of hindering the attainment of individuals goal, wrecking havoc to the society' potential labour force and thus becomes the bane of national development.
III.
CONCLUSION
From the study, it is observed that the water quality of the eight wells present a vivid picture of the nature of pollutants found in the well water where many consumers relay on. Based on the WHO standard for safe drinking water, most of the wells are in critical state of pollution. This means that water from most wells is not in any way suitable for direct consumption as practiced in the area. However to avoid further pollution of groundwater, the study therefore recommends that the site of any well to be dug should be at least 30m away from any source of contamination, the surrounding environment should be kept clean and tidy to avoid or reduce contaminations from dirt around the wells, disinfection of wells water by chlorination and continuous monitoring to determine any change in the level of pollution at the sources.
www.theijes.com
The IJES
Page 3
www.theijes.com
The IJES
Page 4