JCI 2013 Awards Manual

JCI PHILIPPINES
AWARDS MANUAL
2013 EDITION
PREPARED BY
2012 NATIONAL AWARDS COMMITTEE
AWARDS MANUAL CONTENTS

SECTION ONE: RULES & REGULATIONS
I. INTRODUCTION: WHY THE NEED FOR AWARDS?
II. HISTORY OF JCI PHILIPPINES AWARDS PROGRAM
III. THE NATIONAL AWARDS COMMITTEE
IV. GENERAL AWARD RULES
V. SPECIFIC AWARDS GUIDELINES
VI. DUTIES OF HOSTING JCI LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
SECTION TWO: AWARDS PROGRAM WEB-TOOL USERS MANUAL
I. HOW TO CREATE AN ENTRY FOR THE AWARDS PROGRAM
II. HOW TO EDIT AN ENTRY FOR THE AWARDS PROGRAM
III. HOW TO VIEW AN ENTRY FOR THE AWARDS PROGRAM
IV. HOW TO EVALUATE AN ENTRY (JUDGES EVALUATION SITE)
SECTION THREE: EVALUATION CRITERIA
I. SUMMARY OF 2013 AWARDS CATEGORIES
II. CRITERIA
PREFACE
There are many different factors that motivate individuals and groups. These
include financial reasons, power, achievement, opportunity for advancement,
the ability to contribute; but one major factor is the power of RECOGNITION.
We, at the National Awards Committee, are aware that awards are an excellent
supplement to almost any recognition program. JCI Members who are recognized
for their abilities and their contributions to their local organization are more
likely to be happy, content and motivated; they will also continue striving for
excellence in their desire to excel.
We believe that the memberships inherent desire for accomplishment is the
spark that lights the fire from which JCI Philippines derives the warmth that
sustains it. Because of our individual contributions to our local organizations, the
JCI movement in the Philippines has, since 1955, maintained its glorious
tradition of rewarding excellence that continues to shine until this day.
2012 JCIP E-AWARDS SYSTEM AMENDMENT COMMITTEE
CHAIRMAN
JCI Sen. GEAN T. CESAR, NAC 2012

JCI Bai Lawanen, Inc.
CO-CHAIR
JCI Sen. MARK LESTER MANALO, NSG 2012

JCI Sen. REGGIE YU
CONSULTANTS
JCI Sen. REGGIE YU

JCI Sen. BEA JARANTILLA
MEMBERS
2012 AREA 1 Chairman
JCI Mem. Melody Lim

JCI Echague Balamban
2012 Area 2 Chairman
JCI Mem. Carlo Galarrita

JCI Manila
JCI Mem. Maan Velasco- Clemeno

JCI Batangas Caballero
JCI Mem. Maria Liza Nava

JCI Iloilo Ilang-Ilang
JCI Mem. Doreen Ranada

JCI Bai Lawanen
SECTION ONE: RULES & REGULATIONS

I. INTRODUCTION: WHY THE NEED FOR AWARDS?
To recognize and honour outstanding achievement in pursuance of the purposes
of Junior Chamber by local organization and individual members, Junior Chamber
International (JCI) Philippines has instituted a formal system of granting awards
and recognition.
This system hopes to bestow recognition to deserving individuals and local
chapters for outstanding performance, to provide motivation to the award
winners, and as a primary gesture of appreciation by the national organization to
the winners for their excellent work done during the fiscal year.
II. BRIEF HISTORY OF THE JCI PHILIPPINES AWARDS PROGRAM
The history of Junior Chamber International (JCI) awards for the Philippines goes
back to the very first years of the organization; the evolution of the program
follows that of the organization itself.
At the International Councillor's Meeting (now called General Assembly) of Junior
Chamber International in 1947, it was decided how many awards should be
presented at the next Congress and for which activities the awards should be
designated. Initially, JCI presented just two awards the New Zealand Award for
Outstanding National Work and the Unit
(JCI Local Organization) Membership Extension Award presented by Canada.
At the 6th JCI World Congress held in 1951 in Montreal, Canada, the Awards
Commission presented a program with more specific rules for qualifications.
Also, an awards judging panel was mentioned for the first time.
The year 1954 brought big changes and new ideas. JCI introduced the criteria for
judging the awards and the grouping of awards into categories for Individual,
Chapter and National members. During this year, a Certificate of Merit was
presented for the first time, recognizing that sometimes more than one entry
could be worthy of merit.
Following JCIs structured awards program in 1954, JCI Philippines instituted its
first awards system in 1955 during its 7th National Convention in Bacolod City.
At that time, the National Board served as the Committee on Awards, headed by
then National President Amelio R. Mutuc, which gave out the first twenty awards
for outstanding chapters and individuals.
The presentation of the awards at the National Convention has always been a
highlight, although the ceremonies have undergone some changes. From the
years 1961 to 1974, corporate entities sponsored the awards program during the
same period. From 1974 onwards, it became the responsibility of the National
Records and Recognition Committee to provide for a permanent system of

handing.
In 2002, the Junior Chamber International (JCI) General Assembly, during the Las
Vegas World Congress, decided to develop the e-Awards system a web-based
tool that allows members to submit electronic award entries. This was pilottested during the simultaneous International JCI Area Conferences and World
Congress in 2003. Consequently, in 2004, all entries during the Asia Pacific
Conference and World Congress were also submitted electronically. When JCI
adopted a system to cascade the e-Awards web-based tool to the entire National
Organizations in 2004, the National Board of the JCI Philippines adopted eAwards system for all the local and national conferences of the JCI Philippines.
However, since JCI Philippines was unable to procure the web-based software
from JCI, the National Records and Recognition Commission opted to follow the
format of the JCI e-Awards system during this year.
The following year with the numerous technical problems that involved e-awards
communications between JCI and JCI Philippines, which threatened to endanger
the entire e-Awards program of JCI Philippines, the 2005 NRRC Chairman opted
that the submission of the various bids in CDs format was done. This was also a
transition in preparation for an on line bids that gave the impetus for the 2006
National Records and Recognition Commission to embark on an ambitious
program of setting-up a completely new e-Awards software entirely independent
from JCI which JCI Philippines is now using up to the present. This was also the
time when JCI Philippines awards categories were entirely aligned with those of
JCI.
In March 2012, new policies on JCI Awards were adopted in
simultaneous International Conventions and World Congress. New bid
categories and criteria were introduced.
III. THE NATIONAL AWARDS COMMITTEE
As promulgated by Article XIII, Section 11 of the 2009 JCI Philippines By-Laws,
the development of the national awards shall be initiated by the National Awards
Committee (NAC) who shall recognize and honor outstanding achievements in
the fulfilment of the purpose of JCI by Local Organizations or individuals.
The National Awards Committee is charged with the following duties and
functions:
1. To supervise and control the submission, screening and judging
of bids for awards at the Area Conferences and National
Convention; and,
2. To conduct the presentation of awards at the said Area
Conferences and National Convention.
The National Awards Committee shall be composed of a Chairman with five (5)
Area Awards Committee Chairmen as members.
The National Awards Committee Chairman shall be appointed by the National
President and confirmed by the National Board.
Area Awards Committee Chairman - An Area Awards Committee Chairman in
each of the five (5) geographical areas of JCI Philippines is charged with the
following duties and functions under the supervision of the National Awards
Committee, to wit:
1. To administer the submission, screening and judging of bids for
awards at the said Area Conferences; and,
2. To administer the presentation of awards at the said Area Conferences.
3. Area Awards Chairpersons are appointed by Area Vice
Presidents whose qualifications should include any two of the
following: a. Has done and submitted an e-bid project b. Has been
an e-bid judge in the past and c. Has adequate knowledge on the
awards manual. His appointment will go through an approval of
the Area Board members.
IV. GENERAL AWARD RULES
National Awards Program is regulated by the provisions stated in Article XIII,
Section 11 of the JCI Philippines Constitution and By-Laws, which states to wit:
1. FUNCTION. To recognize and honor the outstanding achievements in the
fulfilment of the purpose of the JCI Local Organizations or Individuals.
2. DEVELOPMENT. The development of the national awards shall be
initiated by the National Awards Committee (NAC) who shall ensure their
relevance to the areas of opportunities and to the membership
development of Local Organizations.
3. NEW AWARDS AND AWARD CHANGES. The adoption of new awards,
substitutions of or changes in the award descriptions shall require a twothirds (2/3) vote of the General Assembly.
A. Each of the five (5) area councils shall submit twenty (20)
names to compose the pool of judges one month prior to the first
day of the Area Conference. However, they should not come from
the same JCI local Organization. Only 3 e-bid judges are
allowed from each chapter endorsing e-bid judges both in

Area Conventions and National Awards.
B. Each member of the panel of judges shall have one (1) vote. All
decisions will be made by a simple majority.
C. Upon completion of judging, the awards judges shall review the
entry rules and related matters, and propose desirable changes
to the National Board at their meeting immediately after the
convention. The Board may adopt these rules by a simple
majority.
V. SPECIFIC AWARDS GUIDELINES
A. TYPES OF AWARDS
There are two classifications of JCI awards in the JCI Philippines Awards System:
Group A: JCIP Awards Category

Group B: JCI Awards Category
A.1 JCIP Special Awards
This group pertains to award categories exclusively created by the JCI
Philippines National Records and Recognition Commission and given
during the simultaneous Area Conferences and/or the annual National
Convention.
Joaquin V. Gonzalez Memorial Award (National Convention Only)
First Timer Programs (awarded at JCI international conferences only)
Most Outstanding JCI Family
Asia-Pacific Development Council Training Program Award
Best JCI Week Celebration
Best JCIP Area Convention award (national convention only)
A.2 Local individual awards
This group pertains to all categories relating to individual members
who have done the most to promote the organization by making an
outstanding contribution toward the pursuance of JCIs goals and
objectives.
Most Outstanding JCI Senator
Most Outstanding JCI Trainer

Most Outstanding JCI Project Chairman
A.1 Local organization awards
This group pertains to all categories relating to outstanding long term
or short term projects and programs organized by JCI local chapters in
good standing with the organization and including wards for the Most
Outstanding JCI Local Organizations and newly-organized JCI Local
Organizations.
Best JCI Local Organization Publication
Best JCI Local Organization Web Site
Best International Development Program
Best Environment Development Program
Best Youth Activities Program
Best Sports Development Program
Best Cultural Affairs Program
Best Civic Involvement Program
Best Public Health Program
Education for Peace Award
Award for Assistance to the Handicapped
Best Public Relations Program
Best Fund Raising Program
Hall of Fame award
Best of the Best Local Organization project (natcon only)
Most Outstanding Local President (best of the best; natcon only)
Most Outstanding Local Organization (best of the best; natcon only)

This group pertains to award categories exclusively given during the JCI
Asia-Pacific Conference and/or the JCI World Congress for which JCI
Philippines has adopted the same.
Best Local Community Empowerment Program
Best Long-term Local Community Program
Best Local Economic Development Program
Best Local Personal Skill Development Program
Best Local Growth & Development Program
Best Local UN MDG Project
Best Local Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Program
Best Inter-organization Collaboration Project
Best Local OMOIYARI Project
Most Outstanding New member
Most Outstanding member

Most Outstanding New LO
Outstanding JCI Chapter President (Category 3)
Most Outstanding JCI Local Organization Award (Cat 1)
B. ELIGIBILITY
All JCI Local Organizations affiliated with the JCI Philippines may submit entries
for JCI Philippines Awards subject to the following provisions:
1. All individual bids should have a certification by the JCI Local
Organization President that the individual bidding for an award is
a member in good standing with the JCI Local Organization.
2. All LO bids should contain certification by the National Secretary
General that the bidding JCI Local Organization is a member in
good standing of JCI Philippines.
3. A JCI Local Organization may submit only one entry for each award.
4.
The same project cannot be submitted for more than one award. If an
award is given for joint projects between two or more JCI Local
Organizations, then all JCI Local Organizations concerned may submit a
single entry. In this event, any one of the JCI Local Organizations may
submit the entry on behalf of all JCI Local Organizations participating.
4. The JCI Local Organization must have met the required JCIPEA points
during the deadline of uploading of bids which is 15 days prior to the
opening of the Area Conference to qualify for the Awards Program.
AREA CONFERENCE:
NATIONAL CONVENTION :
50 JCIPEA POINTS
100 JCIPEA POINTS
5. The JCIPEA points of each local organization shall be certified by the

National Secretary General and the required JCIPEA points shall be set and
approved by the National Board.
C. WHO MAY SUBMIT ENTRIES
1. GROUP A:
10
By a Local Organization and Individual member (with the certification of the

National Secretary General) and subject to the following provisions:
a. A Local Organization may submit one (1) entry for each sub-category of
Group A award.
b. A Local Organization may not submit the same project for more than
one award.
2. GROUP B:
By Local Organization and Individual Member (approval of its Local President
and certification of the National Secretary General) and subject to the
following provisions:
a. A LOM may submit only one entry for each award.
b. A LOM may not submit the same project for more than one award.
5. BEST OF THE BEST PROCESS - In order to enhance the value of Area
Conference and National Convention Awards, JCI Philippines will follow the
Best of the Best Concept for certain Individual Awards Categories that will
eventually represent JCIP in the Asia Pacific Convention Awards.
a. JCI Awards: only the major winner and/or, best of the best
winner, and/or hall of fame awardee (for long term
community project) during the Temiong Awards are
allowed to bid for JCI Awards ASPAC bid category which is
subject to National organization Presidents review and
endorsement
b. For World Congress Awards only the Asia-Pacific Awards winners
and/or entries from the National Organization are allowed to
submit entries and should be approved by our National President.
6. Winning entries of Area Conference must not switch to other categories during
the National Convention Awards.
D. WHEN TO SUBMIT ENTRIES
1. All JCI Local Organizations may submit entries for JCI Philippines Awards
during the Area Conference Award Program. Entries must be received by
15 days before the start of the Conference and Convention.
2. All award entries must be created and edited using the tool provided by JCI
Philippines: www.e-awards.org
www.jci.org.ph
or
at
the
new
JCI
Phils
website
11
3. Once an entry has been completed, it must be approved by the Local

Organizations President in office. Local organizations must learn how to
use the JCI Philippines Awards Program Software.
4. The system is open and will start accepting bid entries beginning every
15th of June. The Local Organization should receive a time stamp response
from the website server notifying you of the submission. This will serve as
the official receipt of your bid entry. As a back-up and further ensure the
acceptance of the bid entry, it is suggested that the LO will email the bid
entry document in word format to the NAC Chairman and AAC chairman
following the schedules. The National Organization is not to be liable for
any inconsistency of the system or broadband service for that matter.
Technologies are subject to limitations of service providers and budgetary
constraints.
5. Only one registration per chapter is allowed for both in Areacon
and National Awards e-bid account.
E. AWARD-YEAR PERIOD OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
These regulations apply:
1. The Area Conference Awards period extends 15 days prior to the opening of
the previous years Area Conference and 15 days prior to the opening of the
current year of the Area Conference.
Area Conference: Final dates to be circularized by the NSG and NAC
Chairman
August 2012 August 2013
2. The National Convention Awards period extends 15 days prior to the opening
of the previous years National Convention and 15 days prior to the opening of
the current National Convention.
National Convention: Final dates to be circularized by the NSG and NAC
Chairman
September 2012 September 2013
Projects held in from the previous year CANNOT be included in the
National Convention bid EVEN if it will get an award in the current
Area Conference as that project should have been entered as a bid
during the previous years National Convention.
3. Local organizations must complete any program or project submitted for an
award during the current award year.
12
4. For continuing programs and projects, most of the activity should have taken
place during this period.
5. For the Outstanding Local President Award, the presidents year of office
should be completed in the award year.
F. JUDGING
1. Composition of the Judging Panel - Each of the five (5) Areas shall nominate at
least twenty (20) names that would compose the judging panel one (1) month
prior to the Area Conference. These forms should be forwarded to the National
Awards Committee for the official screening and appointment of judges.
However, no more than three (3) judges should come from the same JCI Local
Organization.
Deadline: To be circularized by the NAC Chairman thru the NSG
July 31, 2013
2. The selection of awards judges is critical to the success of the JCI Philippines
awards program. In this regard, judges must be screened to comply with the
necessary competency and integrity. The selected judges should possess the
following qualifications:
a. Must have been an active JCI Member for the last two years prior
to his appointment and has been an LO Officer;
b. Must have prepared at least one (1) JCI bid for his local chapter or
national organization prior to his appointment;
c. Must not be an incumbent JCI Local Organization President of
Elected/Appointed National Officer;
d. Within the JCI Age;
e. Computer Literate.
f. Must not have an individual bid uploaded under his name
during the year he applies to be an e-bid judge: Most
Outstanding member, Most Outstanding Senator, Most
Outstanding traineretc.
3. The NAC shall send thru email a primer for all the judges which will serve as
their guide in evaluating the entries prior to the judging of awards entries.
4. Judges must not evaluate entries of his Local Organization, and the chapter of
his Region and Area.
5. Each judge must use the JCI Philippines Awards Software to evaluate the
entries during the period established by the NAC. Each judge will mark scores
following the criteria specified for each award.
13
6. The NAC Chairman may conduct the judging by distributing the awards entries
among judges on a process set by the NAC. If the NAC Chair finds it
necessary to replace an ebid judge or distribute assigned bids to
others if he/she thinks the judging is compromised, her/she may do
so without notice.
7. The National Awards Committee is not obliged to grant an award if they feel,
after consultation with the awards chairman, that entries of sufficient merit
have not been received.
For SINGLE entry bids (no other LOs submitted an entry for the category) an
average score of 80% must be met for it to be considered as a MAJOR AWARD
winner both in Area Awards and national awards. This is to ensure that the bid
is sufficient enough in content for it to be considered a major award winner.
8. There will be no merit recognition in any award category except the
Group A Awards for Local Organizations during National Awards. Area
Conventions may also adopt merit awards in the said Group Category.
9. Members of the panel of judges shall keep results secret until they are
announced at the official Awards Ceremony. The element of surprise is
essential.
10. Decision of the panel of judges shall be final and binding, and there will be
no appeals regarding these decisions.
11.Upon completion of the judging, the NAC chairman shall submit a short,
handwritten report to the National Secretary General within 30 days from
completion of the National Convention including:
a. The names of all judges and their Local Organization.
b. The results of the judging arranged in the same format and order as the
awards appear in the Awards Manual. A clear listing of the Awards is
important.
c. It should contain:
- Recommendations from the awards judging panel including a
review of the entry forms, awards judging procedures,
scrapbooks, logistics, etc.
- List of awards winners and scores of judges and each awards
entry.
- Any other relevant statistics on the awards judging for future
reference.
14
- Recommendations and comments on the awards judging and

the Awards Ceremony.
12. For the following Awards, JCI Philippines Efficiency Ranking Points (JCIPEA)
shall contribute one-fourth () weight of the total award points, to wit:
a. Outstanding JCI Local Organization President of the Year Award
b. Outstanding JCI Local Organization of the Year Award
c. Outstanding New JCI Local Organization of the Year Award
Under this setup where one hundred percent (100%) will be considered the
maximum score (perfect score); three-fourths () of the final score shall be
prorated from the results of the scrapbook judging, while one-fourth () of the
final score shall be taken from the total number of points from JCIPEA.
13. Prior to the distribution of bids to the awards judges for evaluation, a prescreening of Bids will be conducted by the National Awards Committee to
check that all bids are valid and ALL criterias are properly filled up. If ONLY
the Basic Entry Information is filled up, the bid will automatically be
disqualified from judging. A letter will then be sent to the Local Organization
by the NAC informing them of the disqualification of the bid.
For bids forwarded for judging/ evaluation, an automatic score of 50 will be
given to other criterias found to be blank.
14. Deadline for bids uploading:
AREA CONFERENCE:
NATIONAL CONVENTION:
August 6, 2013
September 16, 2013
G. THE SCRAPBOOK.
Please refer to Section Two (Awards Program Web Tools Users Manual) of this
guide to learn how to use the JCI Award Program Software. This software is
accessible through www.e-awards.org
H. EXPLANATION OF SOME TERMS USED IN JUDGING.
a. GENERAL PLANNING, EXECUTION AND FINANCE.
These include the outline and general planning of the project, its
objectives, how the committees were formed, and the various steps
for completion. It also includes financial information.
15
b. PARTICIPATION.
This embraces the percentage of a chapters active members
compared to the total membership and the degree of non-JCI
participation.
c. BENEFIT TO COMMUNITY.
This is decided by the judges, who determine how much the project
helped the community.
d. BENEFIT TO THE ORGANIZATION.
This is determined by the judges, who evaluate how the project
helped JCI internationally or locally. The entry should show how the
project gave leadership training and offered opportunities for selfdevelopment to members.
e. CONTINUITY.
This is evaluated by the judges, who examine the length and/or
frequency
2. Introduction:
The purpose of this document is to provide easy guidelines in evaluating the
content of each entry bid. Each criterion requirement is defined and describes
the minimum required content of the entry bids.
In this document, the processes considered are equally important as the
output of the project; therefore, there is strong necessity to demand
explanation of the processes involved in the project or undertaking.
3. Survey:
The survey criterion shall refer to the inputs or data gathering processes
considered to support the analysis and planning activities.
Inputs such as the strategic/tactical/operational considerations like community
demand, market demand, organizational need, technological demand, legal
requirement; what are the tools or technique used in the process and why
were these tools or technique chosen to effectively support the survey
process.
16
At the least, there should be a clear narration on how the process was
conducted and explanations on why the activities were undertaken to support
the survey. Output should include documentations.
4. Analysis:
The analysis criterion shall refer to the examination process on how the
decision was made to pursue the project or undertaking.
The examination process should include the evaluation survey result, clear
description of project objectives including the reasons why a specific project is
the best solution to satisfy the requirements, tools and techniques used in the
process and the output documentations.
The documentation for this analysis also contains a basic description of the
project scope, the deliverables, project duration, and a forecast of the
resources for the organizations investment analysis and the framework.
5. Planning / General Planning:
The planning or the general planning criterion shall refer to the project
planning processes considered to successfully achieve the desired output of
the project or undertaking. Planning should include the preliminary activities,
approach in developing the plan and the related fundamental elements of
the plan such as the scope, time, cost, quality, resources, communication,
risk, procurement and closure of the project. The plan should also explain the
prioritizations, negotiation and conflict management and the problem solving
management. The Plan becomes the primary source of information for how
the project will be planned, executed, monitored and controlled, and closed.
6. Execution / Action:
The Execution or Action shall refer to the processes used or actions made to
complete the work defined in the project management plan to accomplish the
projects requirements. This criterion should explain how the team was
developed and selected, how the project was directed and managed, how the
quality assurance was performed and how the information was distributed in
accordance with the plan. Tools and techniques used should be explained
clearly if any.
7. Monitoring and Control, Evaluation.
The evaluation, monitoring and control shall refer to the processes performed
to observe the project execution and closure. A clear explanation should
include how potential problems are identified in a timely manner and
corrective action can be taken, as necessary, how the control of execution
happened to prevent possible problem; strengths, weaknesses, opportunities,
17
strengths; how the post project evaluation was conducted and terminated.
Process includes collecting, measuring, and disseminating performance
information, change in measures to apply improvements, documentations,
scope control / verifications, problem mitigations and stakeholder
management.
8. Membership Participation:
Membership participation shall refer to the number of members who
participated against total number of members, their specific involvement
whether as an individual or group and activity(ies) to which the member(s)
participated. Explanation should include who participated, the organization,
the job descriptions, how many members in a job, the significance of the job to
the achievement of goals. (Participation by JCI Members, delegates, JCI
Senators and Spouses, Participations of Members in Activities and Program,
Membership by Participation, Participation of Public)
9. Benefit to Community and or Participants; (Benefit of project to
community)
This criterion shall refer to the tangible (quantified) gain of the community or
the participants provided by the project or undertaking. Gain should describe
the significance of the benefit against the need or requirement of the
community or participants and other indirect value added benefit. Benefit
should be specific and answers the goal or objective of the project or
undertaking. It is considered as one of the output.
10. Benefit to Organization Image and Profile:
Benefit to organizations image and profile shall refer to the tangible
(quantified) gain achieved that can be directly attributed to the
organization. Organization Image shall refer to perception of stakeholders and
organization profile shall refer to the distinctiveness. Explanation should
include how the certain benefit improves the perception of stakeholders to the
organization and why is this significant to the organization. Gain to the
organizations profile should show how the said benefit can be distinctly
associated to the organization by the stakeholders.
11. Value to JCI (Membership, Local, National, JCI Movement)
Value to JCI shall refer to non-tangible (qualified) gain in terms of information,
authority, economic, marketing, personal or cultural, individual or
organizational capabilities as a whole, influence, political and resources. Value
to JCI may be one or combination benefiting the membership, local, national
and or movement.
18
Value to JCI Membership should explain how members can attribute the gain
in improving their personal status in community, personal skills and know-how
and other factors because of the project or undertaking whether they
participated or not.
Value to JCI Local should explain how positively the community sees the
organization after the project or undertaking. Value to JCI National shall
likewise be explained how the project or undertaking improves how the
community or selected target audience or beneficiaries sees the gain.
Value to JCI Movement shall be described particularly relating the gain on how
the project or undertaking was able to promote on a wider scale the
advocacies of JCI Movement. Explanation should include who were the target
audience and why was the target audience significant to the movement.
12. Promotion of Free Enterprise
This criterion shall specifically refer to promotion of business in a multi
industry / dimensional (product and services) arrangement. The project or
undertaking should not focus on particular brand or business. Explanation
should include how each enterprise equally promoted in the project or
undertaking, what equal opportunities presented or provided and why is this
significant to the objective of the project and to the stakeholders.
13. Project Achievement and Impact (Achievement of Project)
This criterion shall specifically refer to what was achieved based from the
baseline objective of the project or undertaking; and the effect of the output in
terms of what was expected plus the unexpected. Explanation in this section
should include specific details that are quantifiable and qualified result against
the projection and objective of the project. Whether in the context of Best
Business Development Program or other categories, this definition shall
remain.
14. Finance, Financial Management and Budgeting
Finance shall refer to how the money was saved/spent against priorities in a
timely manner with consideration of risk factors and investments. Explanation
should include the framework on how the policies and measures were
developed, the prioritization, the timing of expenditures, the investment
involved and risk associated. Accounting and budgeting procedures are
standard across the industry, there is no need to explain how this was
conducted.
15. Individual Participation
19
Individual participation shall refer to the number of members who were

actively involved in the project, whether as committee member or support
staff. This can be correlated to the number of members the organization have.
Explanation should also include the participation of each member from
beginning or inception of the project to project closure. Participation shall
likewise involve the job, the job description, the significance of the job to the
achievement of goals.
16. Supporting Materials
Supporting materials should be specific tangible supplies, tools, media,
equipment and or resources critical to support the implementation of the
project; that the absence of the said material would halt the delivery of a
specific deliverable. Materials should be listed and supported by valid proof.
(Support with photograph or attachment of file in .pdf format)
17. Promotion of International Understanding
International understanding shall refer to exchange of information, interaction
(in all aspect. i.e. skill, know-how, social, cultural) and or joint undertaking to
improve or better the relationship and cooperation of local organization with a
foreign JCI organization. Explanation here should include the approach of the
undertaking, how the undertaking was conducted and why this was significant
to the promotion of understanding.
18. Overall favorable public impact
This criterion shall refer to the positive view of beneficiary community on the
project or undertaking implemented. The statement here should be
measurable and not speculative. Explanation should describe the view of the
community, how the response was acquired, tools and techniques used in
gathering the response.
19. Continuity of Program
Continuity of Program shall refer to the strategy of the organization to sustain
the program, relative consistency of result and repeatability of the program
for the next JCI year. Statement description should include sustainable
activities, why the specific activity was chosen to be sustainable, attributes of
the activity to qualify it to be sustainable. Enumerate also the regularity of
activity results. Explain further how the activity can be repeated the next JCI
year.
20. Participation by Sponsor
20
Participation by Sponsor shall refer to the actual personal representation of

the sponsor in specific activities of the project or undertaking. Details should
include the buy-in approach, relative role of the sponsor during any of the
project cycle stages, respective contribution or result or output of each
sponsor. Please site specific documentations relative to the participation of
sponsors.
21. Chapter Management (Membership, Finance, PR, Planning, etc.)
Chapter Management shall refer to the strategic approach against
organizational demand and requirement in managing the local organization.
Explanation should include processes how the organizational demand and
requirement were acquired, enumeration of demand and requirements,
decision making process in selecting the strategic approach and
implementation of the strategic approach.
22. Individual Development Programs
This criterion shall refer to over all programs for mental and physical wellness
and advancement of each member. This among others shall encompass
sports, capacity building, interpersonal skills etc. Explanation should state the
approach in designing the programs, list of programs, target member,
outcome, significance or relation of the program to target member need and
strategy of implementation. Statement should be relevant or centered to
overall plan of local and national organization.
23. Community Development Programs
This criterion shall refer to over all programs for community wellness and
advancement. Explanation should state the approach in designing the
programs, list of programs, target sector of the community, outcome,
significance or relation of the program to community need and strategy of
implementation. Statement should be relevant or centered to overall plan of
local and national organization.
24. International Programs
International programs shall refer to projects or undertaking conducted
abroad. Explanation should site relevance to local organization statement or
thrust or demand or need. Explain the objectives, decision-making process,
opportunities, strategy of implementation and outcome.
25. Business Programs
Business programs shall refer to projects or undertaking specifically to
propagate entrepreneurship and trade, capacity building on business industry,
venture to generate fund or income of a member or the organization.
21
Explanation should state the approach in designing the programs, list of

programs, target beneficiaries, outcome, significance or relation of the
program to need and strategy of implementation. Statement should be
relevant or centred to overall plan of local and national organization.
26. UN agencies participating in the Project
This criterion shall refer to the actual personal representation of a UN agency
in specific activities of the project or undertaking. Details should include the
buy-in approach, relative role of the agency during any of the project cycle
stages, respective contribution or result or output of each agency. Please site
specific documentations relative to the participation of agency.
27. General Management of President
The general management of president shall refer to how the president
efficiently (timing) and effectively (result) managed the organization. Skills
and know-how should not be considered because this may vary from ones
economic status. Explanation should include what processes the president opt
to implement to support chapter operation, management of conflict, resolution
of issues and organizational advancement. Statement should also site how the
president achieved the requirement.
28. Leadership of President
This criterion shall refer to the influence and motivational approach of the
president employed to achieve required results. Explanation should include
the relevant traits, principles, etc. that the president practice to positively
influence and motivate members, the local or the national organization to
achieve planned results.
29. Civic and Governmental Involvement
Civic involvement shall refer to contribution / participation which denote
certain degree of work provided for a non-government organization
undertaking. Likewise, governmental involvement shall refer to contribution /
participation which denote certain degree of work provided for a governmental
organization. Civic and governmental contribution / participation should be a
volunteer work and not part of personal or official business. Explanation
should include the name and nature of the venture, the level or degree of
work provided, relevance of involvement to JCI local, national and movement.
Period should cover current JCI Awards year.
30. Evidence of Continued Adherence to JCI Creed
22
Evidence shall refer to valid proof such as picture, official documents, or other
official instrument recognized in governmental transactions;
Continued adherence shall refer to act of participation, involvement and or
contribution that is related to any of the tenet. Explanation should include the
name and nature of the activity, organizations involved, the level or degree of
work provided, relevance of involvement to JCI Creed. Period should cover
current JCI Awards year.
31. Personal Involvement in development of young people
This criterion shall refer to contribution / participation which denote certain
degree of work provided for the advancement of young people aged 40 years
and below. Explanation should include particular undertaking to positively
advance certain group or sector of young people. Describe the name and
nature of the activity, beneficiary, the level or degree of work provided,
significance of activity in advancement of young people. Period should cover
current JCI Awards year.
32. Evidence of continued support to JCI Movement
Evidence shall refer to valid proof such as picture, official documents, or other
official instrument recognized in governmental transactions; continued
support to JCI Movement shall refer to act of contribution / participation /
involvement to JCI local or national activities. Explanation should include the
name and nature of the JCI local or national activities, the level or degree of
work provided, Period should cover current JCI Awards year only.
33. Innovation in Training Program concept developed
This criterion shall strictly refer to improved or new training module or
program (course) developed for JCI Philippines or JCI. The program developed
should have at least one improved or new module within. Improvement shall
refer to changes in materials to not less than 50% of original materials.
Indicate in the explanation the organizational need or requirement, the
approach in designing the module or program, the process undertaken to
ensure quality and effectiveness, and other materials or tools associated to
the roll out.
34. Scope and relevance of Training as it relates to JCI
Scope and relevance of training to JCI shall refer to content of modules relative
to the JCI creed or areas of opportunities. Explanation should include detailed
scope, purpose or objective, timeline, related materials, expected outcome,
approach in delivery, method, and related tools or technique
35. Quality and appearance of Training Program Outlines
23
Quality shall refer to a high degree of excellence in a work or effort.

Appearance shall refer to logical sequences and arrangement of outline to
facilitate learning effectively and efficiently. Explanation should entail the
program outline, justification on the quality and how the sequencing and
arrangement of outline facilitates effective and efficient learning.
36. Technical merit of the presentation techniques
This criterion shall refer to the arrangement of script and way of presentation
that will qualify the presentation to be effective for the purpose. Explanation
should discuss each presentation page or activity, the script in each page and
guide on how to present each pages.
37. Furtherance of the aims of Individual Development
This criterion shall refer to the specific wisdom or reason why the course or
program was created by the author. Explanation here should discuss
specifically why the course or program will improve or advance individual
development. Please site specific example and outcome which should not be
currently or previously addressed in JCI modules.
38. Participation of other Local and National Organization
Participation of local or national shall refer to the actual personal
representation of the organization in specific activities of the project or
undertaking. Details should include the buy-in approach, relative role of the
organization during any of the project cycle stages, the level or degree of work
provided, respective contribution or result or output of each organization.
Please site specific documentations relative to the participation of
organization.
39. Contribution to the public image of JCI Leadership
This criterion shall refer to the positive perception of the public to JCI as a
leader in individual development programs. Explanations should include what
process was undertaken to get the opinion or perception of the public, the
selection of tools, the result of the process and conclusion or the specific
perception.
40. Support to own Local and National Organization
Support to own local and national organization shall refer to involvement of
member to local and national activities and event. Explanation should show
type or kind of involvement, name and nature of activity or event, date and
time spent, level of work provided. Period should cover current JCI Awards
year.
24
41. Extension of Local and National Organization

This criterion shall refer to strictly to ones personal effort in local or national
organization creation or revival. Explanation should show the specific effort
provided to perform the processes in extension, level of coordination to
existing local or national organization in same location or general area, name
and location of organization and support mechanism provided. Period should
cover current JCI Awards year.
42. Training and orientation programs conducted
This criterion shall refer to specific personal conduct of orientation and
trainings to members and non-members of JCI. Personal conduct of
orientation and training should be 70% in own local organization and 30%
with other organization. Explanation shall include what orientation or training
program conducted, processes, trainer team if any, level of coordination with
NTC / NTD / ATD / RTD, target audience, data and time, summary response of
participants to the trainer and training. Period should cover current JCI
Awards year.
43. Initiative and innovation
This criterion shall refer to the ideas or concept and improvement or
advancement introduced by the member. Both attribute should be present.
Enumerate and explain the initiatives and innovations, buy-in approach,
significance of the initiative and innovation to the organization, expected
outcome, Implementation processes, and actions to sustain adoption. Period
should cover current JCI Awards year.
44. Contribution to public image of JCI
This criterion shall refer to the positive perception of the public to the JCI
organization. Explanations should include what process was undertaken to
get the opinion or perception of the public, the selection of tools, the result of
the process and conclusion or the specific perception.
45. Originality of course
Originality of course shall refer to newly developed course with newly created
training modules that are not within any official JCI national or international
training. Explanation should include how the course is original / different.
Indicate further in the explanation the organizational need or requirement,
the approach in designing the module or program, the process undertaken to
ensure quality and effectiveness, and other materials or tools associated to
the roll out.
25
46. Role of program in overall training of Local/National Organization

This criterion shall refer to specific purpose or function of the program to the
overall training strategy of Local / National Organization. The course should
conform to the local or national theme. Explanation should include how the
program conforms to the local or national theme and how the purpose or
objective plays a role in the local or national organization strategy.
47. Member involvement in development of program
This criterion shall specifically refer to the process to which members were
given opportunity to partake in the development of the program. Explanation
shall include how the consultation was conducted, level of work provided by
each member, significance of each work to the total value of the program,
and how the quality is ensured.
48. Clarity of presentation which includes notes, presentation and
documentation of program, including session notes
This criterion shall refer to the level of simplicity and intelligibility
(intelligence) in the construction of presentation. Explanation shall include
notes such as ideas as you present, emotions and expression related,
presentation and documentation of program, including session notes.
49. Clarity of construction in terms of achieving a positive result as a
training course
This criterion shall refer to how the training course was constructed to suit
target audience. Explanation should include who are the target audience,
choice of terminologies versus audience type, and wisdom or messages to
supplement a positive result.
50. Distribution and marketing program
This shall refer to the strategy in disseminating the program and the
propaganda to propagate the use of the program. Explanation should include
accessibility and availability of program, selection of medium to facilitate the
dissemination, campaign approach, and level of coordination to concern
body.
51. Involvement in own JCI Local Chapter affairs
Involvement to own local organization affairs shall refer strictly to activities
and event initiated by the local organization. Explanation should show type or
kind of contribution, name and nature of activity or event, date and time
spent, level of work provided. Period should cover current JCI Awards year.
26
52. Participation in Inter-Chapter, Regional, National and JCI affairs

Participation in inter-chapter, regional, national and JCI affairs shall refer
strictly to involvement in activities and event. Explanation should show type
or kind of involvement, name and nature of activity or event, date and time
spent, level of work provided. Period should cover current JCI Awards year.
53. Personal Growth, Contribution to Chapters Growth
This criterion shall refer to skills and know-how learned from JCI and how this
benefited the local organization where the member resides. Explanation
should site what are the new sets of skills or know-how acquired thru JCI,
what and where provided by JCI, what skill and know-how were applied to
benefit the local organizations and what instance the skills and know-how was
applied.
54. Promotion utilized
This criterion shall refer to what promotional campaign or materials were in
use for the activity or event; and the manner of utilization. Explanation should
include the activities, the materials used, system of use and how the system
of use significant to the implementation of the activity or event.
55. Theme and Program
This criterion shall refer to the idea or concept and the agenda or activities of
the project or undertaking. The theme and program should be in line with
local and national organization requirement. Explanation should include the
approach in defining the theme and program, selection process, relevance or
significance of theme to the program and relation to the local and national
theme and program.
56. Benefit to own JCI Local Organization and National Organization
Benefit to own local and national organizations shall refer to the tangible and
non-tangible (quantifiable) gain accomplished. Benefit should be for both
local and national. Explanation should include list of benefits to own local and
national organization, how was the benefit recognized by both level of
organizations and significance or relevance of these benefits.
57. Management ability
Management ability shall refer to the strategy in undertaking the project and
management processes implemented to achieve desired results. Explanation
shall enumerate the strategies and how these strategies significant to the
project, discuss each processes adopted to ensure the project success (See
27
Survey, Analysis, Planning, Execution, and Evaluation), and how the

strategies are related to the processes.
58. Active involvement in JCI affairs (local, national, JCI)
Active involvement shall refer to personal and physical representation in a JCI
activity or event whether local, national or international. Explanation should
show type or kind of involvement, name and nature of activity or event, date
and time spent, level of work provided. Period should cover current JCI
Awards year.
59. Contribution to the growth of the JCI movement
This criterion shall refer to tangible and non-tangible value provided to
advance the JCI movement. JCI movement shall refer to the creed and 4 areas
of opportunities. Explanation should enumerate the tangible and non-tangible
value specific to each tenet and the 4 areas of opportunities how are these
tangible and non-tangible values significant to the JCI movement. Period
should cover current JCI Awards year.
60. Meritorious service received
Meritorious service received shall refer to recognitions or commendations
relevant to the JCI Movement granted by any legitimate organized body.
Explanation shall include enumeration of recognitions or commendations,
relevance to the JCI movement and legitimacy of the organized body who
granted such.
61. Continued interest in the JCI movement
This criterion shall refer to the statement of commitment and evidences that
supports the statement. Explanation shall discuss level of commitment to the
JCI movement and proof that said commitment has been delivered and shall
continue to true for a certain period of time.
62. Effectiveness of program
Effectiveness of program shall refer to the usefulness of the set of project or
activity against the need or requirement of the beneficiary. Explanation shall
include how the need and requirement were assessed, use or value of the
program against detailed need or requirement of the beneficiary. Statement
shall include relevance of each activity and response of the beneficiary.
Response should be well documented and means of collection of information
is measurable.
63. Potential contribution to World Peace
28
This criterion shall refer to possible effect of a project or undertaking to world

peace effort.
Possible effect should be enumerated and explanation shall be provided how
the effect could contribute to world peace. Discuss how the project or
undertaking ensured that the opportunity would lead to world peace.
64. Operation of Joint Body
This criterion shall explicitly refer to equal involvement and degree of work of
each partner organization. Explanation should site distribution or delegation of
work, level of coordination, type or kind of work, name and nature of each
activity or event, date and time spent, level of work provided. Period should
cover current JCI Awards year.
65. Benefits of Project (short term, medium term, long term)
Benefit shall refer to gain whether its tangible or non-tangible. In this
criterion, explanation should be provided specifically the short, medium and
long term gain from the project or undertaking, the differences of each gain,
how the short moves to medium to long term, and how is this realized.
66. Quality of news content
This criterion shall refer to relevancy and significance of the articles or writeup to the organization, community, national, social, business, individual, and
international affairs Evaluation should include the grammar, spellings, editing,
taglines, choice of titles, balance of information presented.
67. Appearance and layout (Layout and presentation)
This criterion shall refer to the creativity and innovation to the look or form
and the arrangement of presentation. Evaluation here should include logical
arrangement or sequences, the placing of images / titles / taglines, the design,
choices and combination of color, choice of paper size and cut, and value
added miscellany.
68. Circulation and distribution (methods and figures)
This criterion shall refer to effectiveness of medium or means of disseminating
the information. Explanation shall include choices of medium, justification to
the choices, the figures involved, target audiences and reach to these
audiences.
69. Effective coverage (local, national, JCI activities)
This criterion shall simply refer to the articles or write-up prepared for the
local, national organization, community, national, social, business, individual,
29
and international affairs. Evaluation shall include total presentation of

coverage, intelligence in writing, clarity of content and essence of story.
70. Interactivity and services provided
This criterion shall refer to features and functionalities that facilitate response
or comments, participation, contribution, accessibility and availability of
information required, and tools available. Evaluation shall include ease of use,
logical sequencing of prompts, interface design, relevance of tools provided,
completeness of information provided, performance of website response, and
usability of features/function.
71. Program
Program shall refer to set of activities that has a common goal / purpose /
objective (More than one Activity)
72. Handicap
As defined by the World Health Organization, a handicap is a disadvantage,
resulting from impairment or a disability that interferes with a persons efforts
to fulfil a role that is normal for that person. Handicap is therefore a social
concept, representing the social and environmental consequences of a
persons impairments and disabilities. Physical or mental disability - a person
who has some condition that markedly restricts their ability to function
physically or mentally or socially
73. Guide to Judging Best JCI Week
Following all other requirement as explained herewith in the evaluation guide
relative to specific criterion, Judges must consider the relevance of the Best JCI
week entry to the current national theme and or directives of the present
national board on specific thrust of the celebration and or how to celebrate it.
I. AWARDING.
1. AWARDING CEREMONY MECHANICS.
a. The Awarding Ceremonies shall be held on the second day of the
conference or convention prior to the election of area or national
officers as the case may be.
b. The panel of judges shall be introduced by the National Awards
Committee Chairman only during the National Convention.
c. The host JCI Local Organization of the National Convention shall
present an award to the members of the panel of judges.
30
d. The result of the Area Conference Award shall be announced by the

AAC Chairman and the National Convention Award shall be announced
by the NAC Chairman.
e. Winners will be announced in no particular order.
f. Members of the National Board headed by the National President shall
hand out the awards to the winners.
g. Any high ranking JCI officers present may be invited to hand out the
awards as well.
2. NAME OF THE AWARDS PROGRAM
a. The Area Conference Award shall be entitled AREA AWARDS NIGHT. Similar
provision must be observed strictly, to wit:
- The Area must not call their Area Awards night as Temiong Awards.
- Plaques or trophy must not resemble the Temiong trophy of the
National Awards Committee used during the National Convention.
- Standard Area Awards Night Program as regards to the sequence in
announcing the winners shall be followed across all areas as agreed by
the National Awards Committee.
-
Area e-bid judges should

Temiong Awards Night.
remain
confidential
until
the
b. The National Convention Award shall be named TEMIONG AWARDS where

standard trophies are handed out during the program
J. AWARDING GUIDELINES.
1. The Host JCI Local Organization of the Area Conferences shall provide the
frames for the certificates and trophies for each area. The National Awards
Committee will provide the merit certificates and the plates for the Major
Award.
2. Except for the awards with sponsors, the JCI Philippines National Secretariat
shall provide the plaques for the National Convention. The final form and
design of the awards trophy to be given during the said convention shall
emanate exclusively from the National Awards Committee.
3. All entry bids which fail to obtain/garner Awards or Certificates of Merit but
substantially conform to the objectives of Awards Committee may be
31
extended Certificates of Recognition, depending on the discretion of the

National Awards Committee.
6. The element of surprise is essential to every successful awarding ceremony.
In this case, judges are prohibited from divulging any information that would
spoil the disclosure.
5. The text of the award shall be based on the description of the awards
contained in the manual, if applicable.
6. Signatories of the award shall be as follows:
a. Area Conferences:
Area Vice-President, AAC Chairman, Area Conference Director,
and the Host JCI Local Organization President.
b. National Convention:
National President and National Awards Committee Chairman
K. HALL OF FAME.
Hall of Fame Awardees are barred from bidding for the same award
category for the succeeding year following the receipt of the said honour. Hall
of Fame award is only applicable for Long term Community related
projects under the Group A Awards for Local Organizations and
automatically will be endorsed as JCIP bid for Best in Long-term
Community Development Project in JCI Awards. In the event that no
Hall of Fame awardee is conferred in the current year, this bid category
will be open for bid uploads from any LO both for Area Convention and
National Convention Level.
1. A JCI Local Organization which has garnered the major award in the national
convention for three (3) consecutive years shall be elevated to the JCI
Philippines Hall of Fame.
2. A member of the Hall of Fame shall be ineligible for the same award for the
succeeding year following the receipt of the Hall of Fame.
3. The JCI Philippines shall award plaques to JCI Local Organizations elevated
to the Hall of Fame.
4. The form, design and text of the plaque shall depend upon the discretion of
the JCI Philippines National Secretary-General.
5. Signatories to the plaque shall include the National President, NEVP,
National Secretary General, National Convention Director, National Awards
Commission Chairman and Host JCI Local Organization President.
32
L. JCI AWARDS PROGRAM SEMINAR.

A JCI Awards Program Seminar shall be initiated by the NAC to cover the
workshop on bid book preparation and judging conducted in the five (5)
geographical areas of JCI Philippines at least once a year prior to the holding of
the area conference. However, Award Seminars may be conducted on regional
level. Interested JCI Local Organizations shall forward their proposal for the
conduct of the seminar in the area to the National Executive Vice-President who
shall coordinate with the National Awards Committee Chairman and National
Secretary-General.
VI. DUTIES OF HOSTING JCI LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS
1. LOGISTICS.
Hosting JCI Local Organizations of Area Conferences and National
Convention should provide for the following:
a.
Meeting room for the NAC/AAC and Judging panel.
b. Food for the commission and judges during the period.
c. Secretariat
d. Supplies: pencils, pens, papers, rulers, erasers, etc.
e. Equipment: computer, printer and calculators
And such items that maybe requested from time to time by the NAC
and AAC.
2. AWARDS NIGHT.
Host JCI Local Organizations of Area Conferences and National Convention
shall provide for the following during the Awards Night:
a.
Venue for Awards program with stage sounds system, multimedia projector and other equipment required
b. Food, refreshment and tables and chairs enough for the
number of delegates.
c.
Other requirements as maybe specified by NAC/AAC
such as NAC headquarters, tarps for event, etc.
SECTION TWO: AWARDS PROGRAM WEB-TOOL USERS MANUAL
NEW FEATURES OF THE E-AWARDS WEBSITE
The National Awards Committee is pleased to inform everyone of the additional
features that were added in the website for the convenience of the JCI members.
33
1. There is no need for the JCI member to copy-paste the bids from one site to
the other. The bids of the LO from the Area Awards e-bid site are
automatically uploaded to the NatCon e-bid site. It is the
responsibility of the LO to delete or add e-bid projects at the Natcon
e-bid site. There is no need to register again in the Natcon e-bid
site. Any LO can login right way to the Natcon page, using the Area
Awards registration details. Only one registration per LO is allowed
as security measure.
2. The images you upload in the website will also be sent to your email for your
back up file. This way you get to confirm that what you have uploaded in the
website has been received by website.
3. Mozilla Firefox is the recommended browser for the e-awards site as some
java scripts cannot be read by Internet Explorer. A download link is available
at the e-awards website for the JCI Members to download the browser easily.
I. HOW TO CREATE AN ENTRY FOR THE AWARDS PROGRAM
STEP ONE: GO TO THE E-AWARDS SECTION
To create an entry for the E-Award Program, go to the E-Awards section by
clicking on the TEMIONG AWARDS http://www.e-awards.org
homepage or
www.jci.phils.org and see the link of the e-awards from there.
STEP TWO: REGISTER USERS ENTRY INFORMATION

To be able to access all sections of the E-Awards webpage, you should first
register as a local organization member of the site. If you have not done so,
click the Registration link. You will then be directed to the Membership
Application Page where you will be prompted for your name, e-mail address,
password, address, picture and JCI Local Organization affiliation. As soon as
complete and correct datas have been placed, click the submit button. Only
one registration per chapter will be recognized by the system. This
registered account will be the official account of the chapter for the
current year. Password used should be shared among the chapter
members who are recognized to be part of the chapters e-bid
committee.
34
Please take note that all these fields are required for you to fill up before the
system can accept your registration.
35
After submitting your registration, go back to open your email then from there
click the link of the email message sent by the system to activate your e-awards
account.
36
STEP THREE: TYPE IN YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD

In order to access the E-Awards section page, one must type the USERNAME and
PASSWORD he/she used during registration. In the event that the JCI Member
has forgotten his password, he/she may click the Forgot Password option.
37
STEP FOUR: ADDING OF PROJECT ENTRIES

Upon validating your USERNAME and PASSWORD, the system will prompt you to
the E-Awards List of Entries Menu. To create a new entry, click the Add Project at
the upper right hand corner
38
STEP FIVE: CREATE THE ENTRY FOR THE E-AWARDS PROGRAM

Under the List of Entry page, you will be presented with buttons asking you to
Add, Edit, or Delete Entries. Click on the Add Project, where you will be asked to
choose the award category you wish to enter. You will also be asked to select
your Local Organization and the name of your project or individual.
II. How to Edit an Entry for the Awards Program
To edit an entry for the E-Awards Program, go to the E-Awards section by
clicking in the TEMIONG AWARDS box in the http://www.e-awards.com home
page
STEP TWO: TYPE IN YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD
STEP THREE: SELECT THE EDIT OPTION
A list of entries you uploaded will appear in the page. Click Edit on the Award
which you need to modify.
39
STEP FOUR: EDIT THE ENTRY FOR THE E-AWARDS PROGRAM

A new window will open with the E-Awards Scrapbook. In this window, you will be
able to edit all the information for the selected entry. Under the Criterion field
is a drop-down menu that helps you go through all the pages of the scrapbook.
The information shown depends on the award of the selected entry.
40
STEP FIVE: EDIT THE ENTRY FOR THE EAWARDS PROGRAMS IMAGE
PAGE
Pictures may be uploaded and changed by simply clicking on any of the four (4)
Picture fields. You cannot upload the pictures if no text content was entered
and saved in the criterion box. You will only see the Add Image button under the
picture box after a text has been entered. Do not upload pictures randomly.
Follow sequence of the photo boxes as they appear.
When you click the Add Image button, the image will be uploaded to the JCIP
awards system site. This may take a moment, depending on the speed of your
Internet connection. After the image has been uploaded, the picture thumbnail
will appear. Click on the Save button when you are done with uploading.
If you want to see the actual size of the image, click on the image you wish to
see and a new image window will open. If you want to change an image, click on
the Change option below the image and repeat the upload process.
41
IMPORTANT
The system will accept image files in jpeg format and not bigger than 2MB. Any
image higher than this will be automatically be rejected by the system. However
the system has now a feature that if an image is uploaded the system will
automatically reduce images uploaded to the system but it is advisable to
reduce your images to around 300 kb in order for faster uploading them using
file picture editor. You can also use Microsoft Picture Manager which is usually
available together with your Microsoft Word, Excel and Powerpoint applications.
If your picture is rejected despite its size within the limit, this may be caused by
your picture saved in a different file format aside from jpg.
III. How to View and Delete an Entry for the Awards Program
To view an entry for the E-Award Program, go to the E-Awards section by clicking
in the TEMIONG AWARDS at http://www.e-awards.com
STEP TWO: TYPE IN YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD
You should have first registered your user information before entering this
section.
STEP THREE: SELECT THE ENTRY YOU WISH TO VIEW
Upon validating your USERNAME and PASSWORD, the system will prompt you to
the E-Awards List of Entries Menu. To create a new entry, click the Add Project.
STEP FOUR: VIEW THE ENTRYS SCRAPBOOK
You can view all of your entries by clicking on the List of Projects
STEP FIVE: IF YOU WISH TO DELETE
You can delete an entry by clicking on the List of Project, and clicking on the
delete button. You will then be asked to confirm your action.
42
IV. How to Evaluate an Entry (Judges Evaluation)

To evaluate an entry for the E-Award Program, go to the E-Awards section by
clicking in the TEMIONG AWARDS box at the right sidebar of the http://www.eawards.com home page.
STEP TWO: GO TO AWARD JUDGE EVALUATION SITE SECTION In the EAwards section page, click on the Awards Judges & Evaluation Site.
You will then be asked to type your email address and password which will be
provided by the system when you receive your confirmation email that you
qualified as a judge.
43
STEP THREE: SELECT THE ENTRY TO EVALUATE

After you have successfully logged in, a window showing all the entries you have
to judge/evaluate.
Select the entry you wish to evaluate by clicking on the name/ title of the
project.
The Details of the entry will then be shown.
44
At the left portion of the screen are the different criterias of the bid category for
you to use as basis for evaluation. Choose the score that fits best for the criteria
of the bid. Scoring is from 50 to 100 points.
A drop down box has been provided for easier selection of scores per criteria.
45
The judges score is computed this way:

Each judge's scores are computed by PRO-RATA basis.
For instance, assuming Judge 1 has entered the following scores for an entry,
say Best JCI Week, based on the percentage points indicated in the awards
manual (in parenthesis):
Score: Criteria (percentage points):
54
General Management (20%)
86
Leadership (20%)
75
Participation of members in activities and programs (20%)
90
Achievement of projects (20%)
84
Value to JCI members (20%)
The system would compute as follows: Judge's raw score shall be multiplied (prorated) against the criterion percentage, like so:
54 x 20% = 10.8
86 x 20% = 17.2
75 x 20% = 15.0
90 x 20% = 18.0
84 x 20% = 16.8
Total pro-rated score for this judge, there for is: 10.8 + 17.2 + 15.0 + 18.0 +
16.8 = 77.8
STEP FOUR: EVALUATE THE ENTRY
46
Select the criterion you wish to evaluate through the Criteria Detail Panel. The
criterias shown will depend on the award category being evaluated.
You can click on the picture to enlarge it.
When you are done scoring the evaluation of the entry, click on the SAVE
button, at the bottom left of the window.
47
After clicking the save button, you will go through the summary project list
where you will see the summary of your scores. The system will then ask you to
click on save on the scores.
At any time you can change the score by clicking on change score button.
48
Each judge will be given 6 days to complete the evaluation procedure.

Important:
The NAC has the authority to replace any e-bid judge at any point of
the judging period if he/she feels that judging is compromised. Bids
assigned to such e-bid judge will be re-assigned to other e-bid judges,
or another qualified endorsed judge may replace him/her.
SECTION THREE: EVALUATION CRITERIA

SUMMARY OF AWARDS CATEGORIES

A.1 JCIP Special Awards
Joaquin V. Gonzalez Memorial Award (National Convention Only)
The Joaquin V. Gonzlez Memorial Award, created in honor of the 3rd JCI
Philippines National President and first JCI Senator who gave his life in the
service of JCI, is awarded posthumously to an individual upon the
recommendation of the JCI Philippines National President. The plaque is
presented to the chief delegate representing the national organization to which
the individual was affiliated. This award will be presented ONLY at the JCI
49
Philippines National Convention and the JCI World Congress. Judging: In this
category, judging will be based upon the recommendation of the JCI Philippines National
President.
Most Outstanding JCI Family

The Most Outstanding JCI Family Award is presented to a group of JCI Members
belonging to the same consanguine family (regardless of paternal or material
lineage), whose outstanding contributions and active involvement in the JCI
movement have enhanced the positive public image of JCI for that award year.
Family members who are beyond the age limit for Junior Chamber membership
are eligible for as long as there is at least one currently active JCI Member within
the said age limit included in this entry.
Criteria Points
Active involvement in JCI affairs
(local, national, JCI movement)
Contribution to the growth of the JCI movement
Meritorious service received
Continued interest in the JCI movement
25
25
25
25
Best JCI Week Celebration

The Best JCI Week Celebration Award is presented in recognition of the best
program by a JCI Local Organization toward promoting the positive image of JCI
during the annual JCI Week Celebration held every 2nd week of April (or a date
upon the discretion of the National Board).
Criteria Points
General planning, execution and finance
Promotion utilized
Evaluation
Participation by JCI Members and/or Public
Value to own JCI Local Organization
30
20
10
20
20
If the project was between two or more local organizations, All local
organizations concerned must submit a single entry for this event. They must
decide as to who may submit the entry in behalf of all the JCI Local Organizations
participating. If the local organizations participating are from the different
Areas, they can each submit their entry for the even for the Area Conference
awards ONLY. They must then decide whose entry will be submitted for the
National Convention Awards.
Best JCIP Area Convention award (national convention only)
The Best JCI Area Conference Award is presented to a host JCI Local Organization
(or a group of JCI Local Organizations) in recognition of the Most Outstanding
Area Conference program with a well-balanced curriculum of activities for its
constituent JCI Members. This category is exclusively conferred during the
annual JCI Philippines National Convention.
50
Criteria Points
Theme and Program
Promotion Utilized
Participation by JCI Members,
delegates, JCI Senators and Spouses
Benefit to own JCI Local Organization
and National Organization
Evaluation
10
(strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, strengths)
Supporting materials
20
20
10
15
15
10
If the project was between two or more local organizations, All local organizations
concerned must submit a single entry for this event. They must decide as to who may
submit the entry in behalf of all the JCI Local Organizations participating. If the local
organizations participating are from the different Areas, they can each submit their
entry for the even for the Area Conference awards ONLY. They must then decide whose
entry will be submitted for the National Convention Awards.
First Timer Programs (awarded at JCI international conferences only)

The First-Timers Program Award is conferred exclusively to new JCI Members
from National Organizations in good standing with JCI, who are attending as
official delegates to National Convention for the first time. The mechanics of this
award varies from host chapter to host chapter and is only conducted during
international conferences. Entries are not required for this award.
Asia-Pacific Development Council Training Program Award
At the JCI Asia-Pacific Conferences, the Asia-Pacific Development Council
Training Program Award is presented by the JCI Asia-Pacific Development Council
in recognition of the most outstanding National Organization project in the area
of training. At the JCI Philippines National Convention, a similar award with the
same name is conferred to a JCI Local Organizations outstanding ORIGINAL
training program, with the purpose of either assisting new JCI Local
Organizations (or foreign National Organizations), or reviving fading JCI Local
Organizations (or foreign National Organizations).
Criteria Points
Survey of need and pre-course preparation
Originality of course
Role of program in overall training of
Local/National Organization
Member involvement in development of program
Clarity of presentation which includes notes,
presentation and documentation of program,
including session notes
Clarity of construction in terms of achieving
10
10
15
10
20
25
51
a positive result as a training course

Distribution and marketing program
10
A.2 Local individual awards

All entries submitted under this category SHOULD NOT BE admitted to other
individual awards categories. Should judges come across two or more separate
entries for the same individual, ALL entries for that individual shall be
automatically DISQUALIFIED regardless of merit.
Major winners of similar individual awards of the previous National Conventions
are not allowed to submit entries of the same category.
Most Outstanding JCI Senator
The Most Outstanding JCI Senator Award is conferred in recognition of
outstanding personal contribution and achievement of a JCI Senator who may be
within or beyond the age limit for Junior Chamber membership whose activities
during the current JCI award year and since becoming a Senator have furthered
the interests of the Junior Chamber movement.
Criteria Points
Civic and governmental involvement
Evidence of continued adherence
to the JCI Creed
Personal involvement in programs
to develop young people
Evidence of continued support
for the JCI movement
25
25
25
25
Most Outstanding JCI Trainer

The Most Outstanding JCI Trainer Award is bestowed to a JCI trainer (PRIME
Graduate, CLT, CNT, NG, IG, ITF, as well as JCI-certified trainers for various JCI
Programs), in recognition of his or her outstanding work in uplifting the programs
of JCI Training and the JCI Philippines National Training Commission.
Achievements in this field should primarily involve training as it relates to JCI,
although non-JCI training may also be cited, for as long as it contributes to the
overall public image of JCI. National Training Director/Chairman and JCI Training
Commissioner/Coordinator of the current year are disqualified to participate in
the awards program of the current year.
Criteria Points
Innovation in Training Program
concept developed
Scope and relevance of Training
as it relates to JCI
Quality and appearance of
Training Program Outlines
Technical Merit
of the Presentation Techniques
20
15
15
15
52
Furtherance of the aims of Individual Development

Participation of, and benefits to members,
Local and National Organization
Contribution to the public image of JCI Leadership
10
15
10
Most Outstanding JCI Project Chairman

The Most Outstanding JCI Project Chairman Award is presented to a JCI Member
of a JCI Local Organization who is in good standing with JCI Philippines, in
recognition of his or her outstanding personal participation and management of
a project undertaken by his or her own JCI Local Organization. Chairman or
Director of National and Area Projects and Programs are not qualified for this
award.
Criteria Points
Initiative and innovation
Involvement in own
JCI Local Organization affairs
Management ability
Benefit of project to community
Value to JCI
(membership, local, national, JCI movement)
20
15
30
20
15
A.3 Local organization awards

All entries submitted under this category SHOULD NOT BE admitted to other
awards categories. Should judges come across two or more separate entries for
the same project, ALL entries for that project shall be automatically
DISQUALIFIED regardless of merit.
If the project was between two or more local organizations.
All local
organizations concerned must submit a single entry for this event. They must
decide as to who may submit the entry in behalf of all the JCI Local Organizations
participating. If the local organizations participating are from the different Areas,
they can each submit their entry for the Area Conference awards ONLY. They
must then decide whose entry will be submitted for the National Convention
Awards.
Best JCI Local Organization Publication
The Best JCI Local Organization Publication Award is presented to a JCI Local
Organization in good standing with JCI Philippines, whose regular publication
embodies the spirit of an outstanding organ that promotes the best value to JCI.
Criteria Points
General planning and execution
Financing
Quality of news content
15
10
15
53
Appearance and layout

15
Circulation and distribution (methods and figures)
Effective coverage (local, national, JCI activities)
Benefit to community
10
Value to JCI
10
15
10
Best JCI Local Organization Web Site

The Best JCI Local Organization Website Award is presented to a JCI Local
Organization in good standing with JCI Philippines in recognition of the most
outstanding JCI Local Organization web page.
Criteria Points
Layout and presentation
Interactivity and services provided
Value to Own JCI Local Organization Members
25
25
25
25
Best International Development Program

The Best International Development Program Award is presented to a project or
program that best promotes the second tenet of the JCI Creed which states that
the Brotherhood of Man Transcends the Sovereignty of Nations. The award is
intended to recognize outstanding projects or programs which advance global
goodwill and international understanding.
Criteria Points
Participation by membership
Promotion of international understanding
10
Value to JCI (membership, local,
National, JCI movement)
20
20
40
10
Best Environment Development Program

The Best Environment Development Program Award is presented to a project or
program in recognition of the best contribution by a JCI Local Organization
toward improving the quality of life in the local environment executed in the
most original and efficient manner.
Criteria Points
Participation
Benefit to participating JCI members
25
15
25
25
54
Supporting material
10
Best Youth Activities Program

The Youth Activities Award is presented to a project or program in recognition of
the most outstanding undertaking in the field of youth activities. Youth projects
that may be submitted include those which include education, health care, civic
or government involvement, and community development.
Criteria Points
Membership participation
40
Continuity of program
10
Supporting material
20
15
10
5
Best Sports Development Program

The Best Sports Development Program Award is presented to a JCI Local
Organization who is in good standing with JCI Philippines, in recognition of the
most outstanding and well-rounded program in the field of sports development,
which either benefits its own individual members or the community at large.
Criteria Points
Participation of own
JCI Local Organization Members and public
Value to Members
Value to JCI
Benefit to the community
20
25
20
20
15
Best Cultural Affairs Program

The Best Cultural Affairs Program Award is presented to a project or program in
recognition of the most outstanding undertaking in the area of cultural heritage
preservation.
Criteria Points
Survey and analysis
Continuity of Program
20
Value to JCI
5
15
30
30
55
Best Civic Involvement Program

The Best Civic Involvement Program Award is presented to a project or program
in recognition of the most outstanding JCI program of government involvement
or cooperation with other agencies or groups. Projects that may be submitted
could include joint programs with government agencies and/or nongovernmental organizations, specialized civic groups, or associations espousing
special advocacies.
Criteria Points
Effectiveness of program
Value to JCI
15
40
20
10
15
Best Public Health Program

The Best Public Health Program Award is presented to a project or program in
recognition of the most outstanding JCI local organization endeavor conducted in
the field of public health.
Criteria Points
Survey and analysis
Value to JCI
5
20
25
25
25
Education for Peace Award

The Education for Peace Award is presented to a project or program in
recognition of the best educational program conducted outside the classroom for
children between the ages of 6 and 12.
Criteria Points
Survey and analysis
Benefit to participants
Potential contribution to World Peace
3
17
30
30
20
56
Award for Assistance to the Handicapped

The Award for Assistance to the Handicapped is presented to a project or
program in recognition of the most outstanding undertaking by a JCI Local
Organization in rendering humanitarian assistance to the physically and/or
mentally-challenged individuals or groups.
Criteria Points
Survey and analysis
Value to JCI
20
4
16
30
30
Best Public Relations Program

The Best Public Relations Program Award is presented to a project or program in
recognition of the best project or program in the field of public relations by a
local JCI Organization.
Criteria Points
Overall favorable public impact
Participation by members
Planning, execution and finance
40
10
15
25
10
Best Fund Raising Program

The Best Fund Raising Program Award is presented to a project or program in
recognition of the most outstanding fund-generating program incorporating
project innovation, level of financial success earned from the project or program,
and the degree of participation by sponsors and JCI members.
Criteria Points
Participation by sponsors and/or membership
Benefit to the organization
Finance
10
Supporting material
20
20
40
10
Best of the Best Awards and Hall of Fame

Because judging will be based on the previously-submitted entries of category
winners, SEPARATE ENTRIES ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS CATEGORY. This
57
award will only be presented during the National Convention. Entries are not
required for this award. Upon completion of judging of all awards category, a
committee comprised of at least one judge from each subcommittee, shall
review the award-winning entries to select the Best of the Best.
Hall of Fame award
Hall of Fame award on the other hand will be given to a Local organization
whose community project has won for 3 consecutive years. Furthermore, Hall of
Fame project may be uploaded for JCI Awards to represent JCIP for the Best on
Long term community Devt Program bid category. In case there is no Hall of
fame awardee in that particular year, this bid category will be open for other LO
to bid.
Best of the Best Local Organization project
The Best of the Best JCI Local Organization Project Award is awarded in
recognition of the best local project, among the award winners of the year. The
entries will be judged on the following:
Criteria Points
General Planning and Execution
Financial Management and Budgeting
Participation by members
Benefits (based on objectives of the project)
Supporting Material
20
20
10
40
20
Best of the Best Most Outstanding Local President

The Outstanding JCI Chapter President Award is given to a JCI Chapter President
whois among the 3 organization membership categories in recognition of
outstanding leadership in promoting and contributing to the interests of his or
her local organization in each of the following membership categories:
B.1a 25 to 45 members;
B.1b 46 to 75 members; and
B.1c more than 75 members
Criteria points:
Leadership, Motivation, Inspiration of Members
Community Impact
Impact on Local Organization
Participation in JCI Events
Exemplification of JCI Values in JCI Activities
Exemplification of JCI Values in Personal Life
20
20
25
15
20
Best of the Best Most Outstanding Local Organization

A trophy is given in recognition of the Best JCI Local Organization of the Year.
Since this comprises the Best of the Best among the three (3) Outstanding
Local Chapter winners from each membership category, the winner will be based
on the following criteria:
58
Criteria points:
Strategic Plan
Individual Development Programs and Results
Community Development Programs and Results
International Development Programs and Results
Economic Development Programs and Results
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
GROUP B: JCI Awards Category

This group award category pertains to bids that are exclusive for JCI Awards and
World Congress. Major winners in these bid categories will automatically
represent JCIP as bid entries to the JCI Awards. All bids in this award category
should not submitted to other bid award categories.
Best Local Community Empowerment Program (suggested for national
winner)
Criteria points:
Objectives, Planning, Finance and Execution
20%
Membership Participation
20%
Community Impact
20%
Benefit to the Local Organization
20%
Sustainability of the Program
20%
Best Long-term Local Community Program
The Best Long term Local community Program is primarily intended for the Hall
of Fame awardee for the year which requires that the bid should be Community
related and been running for a least 3 years. Bid should still be uploaded. If
there is no Hall of Fame awardee in that particular year, this bid category will be
open for bid uploads from all other Local organizations both in Area Convention
and National Convention level.
Criteria points:
20%
Community Impact
Best Local Economic Development Program
Criteria points:
Promotion of Free Enterprise
Impact on Local Economy
Impact on Community and Participants
Partnerships and Public Relations
20%
20%
20%
20%
15%
15%
25%
20%
10%
15%
59
Best Local Personal Skill Development Program

Criteria points:
Skills Developed
Benefit to Participating Members
20%
15%
25%
20%
20%
Best Local Growth & Development Program

Criteria points:
Strategic Plan
25%
Involvement of Local Board of Directors and Members
Methods of Implementation
Results Achieved
20%
15%
20%
20%
Best Local UN MDG Project
Note: Entries submitted to UN MDG Award may be also admitted to other awards
categories.
Criteria points:
Community Impact
Link with UN Agencies or Partnerships
20%
20%
30%
10%
20%
I. Background
In September 2000, at the United Nations (UN) Millennium Summit, world
leaders agreed to a set of time bound and measurable goals and targets for
combating poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, environmental degradation and
discrimination against women. Placed at the heart of the global agenda, they are
now called the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and are consisted of eight
topics:
1. Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
2. Achieve universal primary education
3. Promote gender equality and empower women
4. Reduce child mortality
5. Improve maternal health
6. Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases
7. Ensure environmental sustainability
8. Develop a global partnership for development
The MDGs provide a framework for the entire UN system to work
coherently together towards a common end. In this context, the world is making
progress toward the MDGs, but it is uneven and too slow.
60
A large majority of nations will reach the MDGs only if they get substantial
support advocacy, expertise and resources - from outside such as NonGovernmental Organizations (NGOs) like JCI.
Thus, as the result of the 2003 JCI-UN Leadership Summit held at UN
Headquarters itself in New York, JCI took over the responsibility to also contribute
to the efforts of UN and presented a resolution supporting the UN MDGs, which is
the main program put into practice by the Office of UN Secretary General Kofi
Annan.
II. The Eight Categories
Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger:
Reduce by half the proportion of people living on less than a dollar a

day
Reduce by half the proportion of people who suffer from hunger

Achieve universal primary education:
Ensure that all boys and girls complete a full course of primary
schooling
Promote gender equality and empower women:
Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education

preferably by 2005, and at all levels by 2015.
Reduce child mortality:
Reduce by two thirds the mortality rate among children under five.
Improve maternal health:
Reduce by three quarters the maternal mortality ratio.

Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases:
Halt and begin to reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS
Halt and begin to reverse the incidence of malaria and other major
diseases.
Ensure environmental sustainability:
Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country

policies and programs; Reverse loss of environmental resources;
Reduce by half the proportion of people without sustainable access

to safe drinking water;
Achieve significant improvement in lives of at least 100 million slum

dwellers, by 2020.
Develop a global partnership for development:
Develop further an open trading and financial system that is rulebased, predictable and non-discriminatory.
Includes a commitment to good governance, development and

poverty reductionnationally and internationally;
Address the least developed countries special needs. This includes

tariff-and quota-free access for their exports; enhanced debt relief for heavily
indebted poor countries; cancellation of official bilateral debt; and more generous
official development assistance for countries committed to poverty reduction;
Address the special needs of landlocked and small Island developing

states;
Deal comprehensively with developing countries debt problems

through national and international measures to make debt sustainable in the long
term;
61
In cooperation with the developing countries, develop decent and

productive work for youth;
In cooperation with pharmaceutical companies, provide access to

affordable essential drugs in developing countries;
In cooperation with the private sector, make available the benefits

of new technologiesespecially information and communications technologies.
Best Local Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Program

Criteria points:
10%
Community Impact
20%
Alignment to One or More of the Ten Principles through Concrete
Measures 25%
Results Achieved
15%
15%
15%
Background: At the JCI World Congress in Vienna, Austria, in October 2005, JCI officers
and several high-ranking political and business representatives signed the Vienna CSR
Treaty," which sets out Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a principle of
conducting business.
At the JCI World Congress in Seoul, Korea, in November 2006, JCI passes a Resolution
to Advance the CSR.
At the JCI Leadership Summit at the United Nations in New York, USA, in July 2007, JCI
deepens its work in the field of CSR. In 2008, JCI passes the JCI Commitment to Action
to Advance CSR Through the UN Global Compact.
Best Inter-organization Collaboration Project

The Best Joint Work by a Group of JCI Local Organizations Award is presented to
a joint undertaking planned and implemented by more than one JCI Local
Organization. The activity may be any JCI activity but should emphasize
cooperation to meet some national or global need.
Criteria points:
Cooperation between the Local Organizations
Impact on Members and Contribution to the JCI Vision
Community Impact
15%
20%
20%
25%
20%
62
Best Local OMOIYARI Project

Criteria points:
Cooperation for the Sake of World Peace
Community Impact
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
Most Outstanding New member

The Most Outstanding New JCI Member Award is presented to a JCI Member, who
has been affiliated with his JCI Local Organization in good standing with JCI
Philippines for not more than eighteen (18) months, excluding currently elected
national officers of JCI Philippines, appointed national officers of the JCI
Philippines Executive Committee, and currently elected and appointed officers of
Junior Chamber International, who has done displayed exemplary and
meritorious performance in furthering the interests and ideals of the JCI
movement.
Criteria points:
20%
Community Impact
20%
Participation in Training and Orientation programs
20%
Participation in Community and International Events
20%
Exemplification of JCI Values in JCI Activities & Personal Life
20%
Most Outstanding Member
The Most Outstanding JCI Member Award is presented to a JCI Member who has
been affiliated with his JCI Local Organization in good standing with JCI
Philippines for not less than eighteen (18) months, excluding currently elected
national officers of JCI Philippines, appointed national officers of the JCI
Philippines Executive Committee, and currently elected and appointed officers of
Junior Chamber International, who has done the most to promote the
organization by making an outstanding contribution toward its development
internationally.
Criteria points:
Impact on Local and National Organization
Community Impact
Exemplification of JCI Values in JCI Activities
20%
20%
20%
20%
63
Exemplification of JCI Values in Personal Life
20%
Most Outstanding New LO

The Most Outstanding New LO of the Year is presented to the most outstanding
local organization which has been officially affiliated with JCI Philippines for not
more than three (3) years and is currently an affiliate in good standing, in
recognition of its meritorious accomplishments in the pursuit of JCI goals and
objectives. Winner for this award category will automatically the official bid entry
of JCIP for the JCI Awards in the same bid category.
Criteria points:
Strategic Plan
Recruitment Strategy
10%
30%
15%
15%
15%
15%

The Outstanding JCI Chapter President Award is given to a JCI Chapter President
in recognition of outstanding leadership in promoting and contributing to the
interests of his or her local organization in each of the following membership
categories:
B.1a 25 to 45 members;
B.1b 46 to 75 members; and
B.1c more than 75 members
Criteria points:
Leadership, Motivation, Inspiration of Members
20%
Community Impact
20%
25%
15%
Exemplification of JCI Values in JCI Activities & Personal Life
20%
Outstanding JCI Local Organization Award (from 25 to 45 members)
category 3
Outstanding JCI Local Organization Award (from 46 to 75 members)
category 2
64
Outstanding JCI Local Organization Award (more than 75 members)

category 1
The Outstanding JCI Local Organization Award is given to a JCI Local Organization
in recognition of in recognition of the most outstanding JCI Local Organization of
JCI Philippines in each of the following membership categories:
Criteria points:
Strategic Plan
20%
GOODLUCK AND SEE YOU AT THE AREA AWARDS AND

TEMIONG AWARDS!
20%
20%
20%
20%

JCI 2013 Awards Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

JCI 2013 Awards Manual

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

JCI 2013 Awards Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

JCI PHILIPPINES

AWARDS MANUAL CONTENTS

JCI Sen. GEAN T. CESAR, NAC 2012

JCI Sen. MARK LESTER MANALO, NSG 2012

JCI Sen. REGGIE YU

JCI Mem. Melody Lim

2012 Area 2 Chairman

JCI Mem. Carlo Galarrita

2012 Area 3 Chairman

JCI Mem. Maan Velasco- Clemeno

2012 Area 4 Chairman

JCI Mem. Maria Liza Nava

2012 Area 5 Chairman

JCI Mem. Doreen Ranada

SECTION ONE: RULES & REGULATIONS

Records and Recognition Committee to provide for a permanent system of

allowed from each chapter endorsing e-bid judges both in

Group A: JCIP Awards Category

Most Outstanding JCI Trainer

Group B: JCI Awards Category

Most Outstanding member

5. The JCIPEA points of each local organization shall be certified by the

By a Local Organization and Individual member (with the certification of the

3. Once an entry has been completed, it must be approved by the Local

- Recommendations and comments on the awards judging and

Individual participation shall refer to the number of members who were

Participation by Sponsor shall refer to the actual personal representation of

Explanation should state the approach in designing the programs, list of

Quality shall refer to a high degree of excellence in a work or effort.

41. Extension of Local and National Organization

46. Role of program in overall training of Local/National Organization

52. Participation in Inter-Chapter, Regional, National and JCI affairs

Survey, Analysis, Planning, Execution, and Evaluation), and how the

This criterion shall refer to possible effect of a project or undertaking to world

and international affairs. Evaluation shall include total presentation of

d. The result of the Area Conference Award shall be announced by the

Area e-bid judges should

b. The National Convention Award shall be named TEMIONG AWARDS where

extended Certificates of Recognition, depending on the discretion of the

L. JCI AWARDS PROGRAM SEMINAR.

STEP TWO: REGISTER USERS ENTRY INFORMATION

STEP THREE: TYPE IN YOUR USERNAME AND PASSWORD

STEP FOUR: ADDING OF PROJECT ENTRIES

STEP FIVE: CREATE THE ENTRY FOR THE E-AWARDS PROGRAM

STEP FOUR: EDIT THE ENTRY FOR THE E-AWARDS PROGRAM

IV. How to Evaluate an Entry (Judges Evaluation)

STEP THREE: SELECT THE ENTRY TO EVALUATE

The judges score is computed this way:

You can click on the picture to enlarge it.

Each judge will be given 6 days to complete the evaluation procedure.

SECTION THREE: EVALUATION CRITERIA

Group A: JCIP Awards Category

Most Outstanding JCI Family

Best JCI Week Celebration

First Timer Programs (awarded at JCI international conferences only)

a positive result as a training course

A.2 Local individual awards

Most Outstanding JCI Trainer

Furtherance of the aims of Individual Development