Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

Towards an Arbitrage Interpretation of Optimization

Theory
David Ellerman
World Bank
December 2000
Table of Contents
Introduction: Finding the arkets in the ath
!rbitrage in "ra#h Theor$
E%am#les of !rbitrage&Free Conditions
'irchhoff(s )oltage *a+
!ssemblies of "ears or Wheels
Cli,ue Formation in -ocial "rou#s
.eat !rbitrage in Thermod$namics
!rbitrage in /robabilit$ Theor$
!rbitrage and 0#timi1ation Theor$
!rbitrage&Free Conditions on arket "ra#hs
!n Economic Inter#retation of Cofactors2 Determinants2 and Cramer(s 3ule
!rbitrage&Free arket atrices
First&0rder 4ecessar$ Conditions as !rbitrage&Free Conditions
3eferences
!##endi%: -econd&0rder Conditions as !rbitrage&-tabilit$ Conditions
Introduction: Finding the Markets in the Math
0ne of the fundamental insights of mainstream neoclassical economics is the connection bet+een
com#etitive market #rices and the *agrange multi#liers of o#timi1ation theor$ in mathematics5
6et this insight has not been +ell develo#ed5 In the standard theor$ of markets2 com#etitive
#rices result from the e,uilibrium of su##l$ and demand5 But in a constrained o#timi1ation
#roblem2 there seems to be no mathematical version of su##l$ and demand functions so that the
*agrange multi#liers could be seen as e,uilibrium #rices5 .o+ can one 7Find the markets in the
math7 so that *agrange multi#liers +ill emerge as e,uilibrium market #rices8
We argue that the solution to the 7Finding the markets in the math7 #roblem is to reconce#tuali1e
e,uilibrium as the absence of #rofitable arbitrage instead of the e,uating of su##l$ and demand5
With each #ro#osed solution to a classical constrained o#timi1ation #roblem2 there is an
associated market5 The ma%imand is one commodit$2 and each constraint #rovides another
commodit$ on this market5 "iven a marginal variation in one commodit$2 one can define the
marginal change is an$ other given commodit$ so the market has a set of e%change rates bet+een
the commodities5 The usual necessar$ conditions for the #ro#osed solution to solve the
ma%imi1ation #roblem are the same as the conditions for this mathematicall$ defined 7market7 to
be arbitrage&free5 The #rices that emerge from the arbitrage&free s$stem of e%change rates
9normali1ed +ith the ma%imand as numeraire: are #recisel$ the *agrange multi#liers5 We also
sho+ the cofactors of a matri% describing the marginal variations can be taken as the #rices
9before being normali1ed: so the *agrange multi#liers can al+a$s be #resented as ratios of
cofactors5
-tarting +ith an$ s,uare m m matri% 9+ith rank m;<:2 a market can also be defined and the
cofactors given a #rice inter#retation so that an economic inter#retation can be constructed for
the inverse matri% and for Cramer(s 3ule5
The relevant mathematical result2 +hich dates back to !ugustin Cournot in <=>=2 is that:
there e%ists a s$stem of #rices for the commodities such that the given e%change
rates are the #rice ratios if and onl$ if the e%change rates are arbitrage&free 9in the
sense that the$ multi#l$ to one around an$ circle:5
This sim#le gra#h&theoretic theorem is kno+n in its additive version as 'irchhoff(s )oltage *a+
9')*::
there e%ists a s$stem of #otentials at the nodes of a circuit such that the voltages
on the +ires bet+een the nodes are the #otential differences if and onl$ if the
voltages sum to 1ero around an$ c$cle5
'irchhoff(s +ork +as #ublished in <=?@2 so it might be called 7the Cournot&'irchhoff la+57
There is also an additive version of the additive ')*5 If t+o commodities are s+a##ed2 one unit
for one unit2 then usuall$ some additional 7boot7 must be #aid for the higher valued commodit$5
For each #air of goods i and A2 su##ose +e are given an amount boot9i2A: that is the additional cash
boot that needs to be #aid along +ith one unit of good i in order to receive one unit of good A5
Then ')* takes the form:
"iven a s$stem of boots for commodit$ s+a#s2 there e%ists a set of unit #rices for
the goods such that the boot necessar$ for an e%change of units is the #rice
difference if and onl$ if the s$stem of boots is arbitrage&free in the sense of
summing to 1ero around an$ circle5
We sho+ that this Cournot&'irchhoff la+ has man$ a##lications outside of electrical circuit
theor$ and economics5 For instance2 the second la+ of thermod$namics can be formulated as the
im#ossibilit$ of a certain form of 7heat arbitrage7 bet+een tem#erature reservoirs2 and the
7#rices7 that emerge in this case are the 'elvin absolute tem#eratures of the reservoirs5 6et
another a##lication of the arbitrage frame+ork is in #robabilit$ theor$5 /rofitable arbitrage in the
market for contingent commodities is called 7making book57 ! #erson(s subAective #robabilit$
Audgments satisf$ the la+s of #robabilit$ if the$ are 7coherent7 in the sense of not allo+ing book
to be made against the #erson5 Thus arbitrage on the market for contingent commodities enforces
the la+s of #robabilit$5
!rbitrage&related conce#ts have been a##lied successfull$ in financial economics5 erton .5
iller and Franco odigliani used im#ressive arbitrage arguments in #roving their famous
irrelevance theorem B<CD=E5 -te#hen !5 3oss B3oss <C@Fa2 <C@FbE and his colleagues have
develo#ed !rbitrage /ricing Theor$ so that it is no+ recogni1ed as a fundamental #rinci#le in
finance theor$ B)arian <C=@E5 0ur #ur#ose here is not to use arbitrage conce#ts to stud$ financial
markets2 but to find the mathematicall$ defined 7markets7 and the related arbitrage&conce#ts in
the mathematics of all classical constrained o#timi1ation #roblems5
2
Arbitrage in Graph Theory
! directed graph " G9"
0
2"
<
2 t2h: is given b$ a set "
0
of nodes 9numbered 02<25552m:2 a set "
<
of
arcs 9numbered <2225552b:2 and head and tail functions h2t:"
<
"
0
2 +hich indicate that arc A is
directed from its tail2 the t9A: node2 to its head2 the h9A: node5
t9A: h9A:
!rc A
Figure 1. !rc A from Tail t9A: to .ead h9A:
It is assumed that there are no loo#s at a node2 i5e52 h9A: t9A: for all arcs A5 ! path from node i to
node i( is given b$ a se,uence of arcs connected at their heads or tails that reach from node i to
node i(5 ! gra#h is connected if there is a #ath bet+een an$ t+o nodes5 It is assumed that the
gra#h " is connected5 ! closed circular #ath +here no arc occurs more than once is a cycle Bfor
more gra#h theor$2 see an$ te%t such as Berge and "houila&.ouri <CFDE5
*et T be an$ grou# 9not necessaril$ commutative: +ritten multi#licativel$ 9i5e52 a set +ith a binar$
#roduct o#eration defined on it2 +ith an identit$ element < and +ith ever$ element having a
multi#licative inverse or reci#rocal:5 For most of our #ur#oses2 T can be taken as 3H2 the
multi#licative grou# of non1ero reals5 In the motivating economic inter#retation2 a different
commodit$ is associated +ith each node2 and the arcs re#resent channels of e%change or
transformation bet+een the commodities at the nodes5 ! function r:"
<
T is a rate system giving
e%change or transformation rates5 "iven an arc A2 one unit of the t9A: commodit$ can be
transformed into r9A: G r
A
units of the h9A: commodit$5
t9A: h9A:
!rc A
3ate r
A
Figure 2. Transformation 3ate r
A
on !rc A
! gra#h 9"2r: +ith a rate s$stem r re#resents a market2 so it +ill be called a market graph. These
grou#&labeled gra#hs are also called 7voltage gra#hs7 B"ross <C@?E or 7grou# gra#hs7 B.arar$ et
al5 <C=2E5
!ll transformations are reversible5 If arc A is traversed against the arro+2 the transformation rate
is the reci#rocal <Ir
A
5 "iven a #ath c from node i to i(2 the composite rate rBcE is the #roduct of the
rates along the #ath using the reci#rocal rate for an$ arc traversed against the direction of the
arro+5 ! function /:"
0
T labeling the nodes is a price system 9or absolute #rice s$stem:5 !
rate s$stem J9/::"
<
T can be derived from a #rice s$stem b$ taking the #rice ratios
J9/:9A: G /9h9A::
;<
/9t9A::5
Equation 1. Derived 3ate on arc A G /rice at Tail Divided b$ /rice at .ead
Derived rate s$stems have certain s#ecial #ro#erties:
<5 for an$ #ath c from i to i(2 J9/:BcE G /9i(:
;<
/9i:2
>
25 for an$ t+o #aths c and c( from i to i(2 J9/:BcE G J9/:Bc(E2 and
>5 for an$ c$cle c2 J9/:BcE G <5
"iven a market gra#h 9"2r:2 the rate s$stem r is said to be path-independent if for an$ t+o #aths c
and c( bet+een the same nodes2 rBcE G rBc(E5 The rate s$stem is said to be arbitrage-free if for an$
c$cle c2 rBcE G < B7arbitrage&free7 G 7balanced7 in much of the gra#h&theoretic literature follo+ing
.arar$ <CD>E5
r G <I2
r G >
r G >I2
r G ?I>
r G ?
r G <I<2
# G < # G 2
# G F
# G ?
# G >
# G <2
rBcE G9<I2:9<I>:9>I2:9?I>:9<I?:9<2: G <
Figure 3. !n !rbitrage&Free arket "ra#h
In an ideali1ed international currenc$ e%change market +ith no transaction costs2 if the #roduct of
the e%change rates around a circle is greater than one2 #rofitable arbitrage is #ossible5 If the
#roduct is less than one2 then e%change around the circle in the o##osite direction +ould be
#rofitable arbitrage5 .ence the market is arbitrage&free if the #roduct of e%change rates around
the circle is one5
! rate s$stem derived from a #rice s$stem has both the #ro#erties of being #ath&inde#endent and
arbitrage&free2 and2 in fact2 the three #ro#erties are e,uivalent5 That e,uivalence theorem is the
finite multi#licative version of the calculus theorem about the e,uivalence of the conditions:
<5 a vector field is the gradient of a #otential function2
25 a line integral of the vector field bet+een t+o #oints is #ath&inde#endent2 and
>5 a line integral of the vector field around an$ closed #ath is 1ero5
Cournot!irchhoff Arbitrage Theorem: *et 9"2r: be a market gra#h +ith r:"
<
T taking
values in an$ grou# T5 The follo+ing conditions are e,uivalent:
<5 there e%ists a #rice s$stem / such that J9/: G r2
25 the rate s$stem r is #ath&inde#endent2 and
>5 the rate s$stem r is arbitrage&free5
For a #roof of this straightfor+ard noncommutative generali1ation of 'irchhoff(s )oltage *a+
9<=?@: and Cournot(s earlier 9<=>=: arbitrage&free condition2 see Ellerman B<C=?2 <CC0E5
?
"#amp$es of ArbitrageFree Conditions
!irchhoff%s &o$tage 'aw
The original 7arbitrage&free7 condition in electrical circuit theor$ is 'irchhoff(s voltage la+
9')*:5 It is the additive version of the multi#licative arbitrage #rinci#le5 In economics2 the
commodit$ +ith the #rice of < is the numeraire5 In circuit theor$2 the node +ith a #otential of 0 is
the 7ground7 or 7datum7 node5 ! real&valued function on the nodes of a gra#h is a 7#otential57
The additive version of the ,uotient o#erator J9: is the difference o#erator2 +hich assigns to each
arro+ the difference bet+een the #otentials at the tail and head of the arro+5 If an assignment of
reals to the arro+s of the gra#h comes from a #otential on the nodes b$ taking these differences2
then the assignment to the arro+s is called a 7#otential difference7 or 7tension57 3eals assigned to
the arro+s can be added u# around an$ c$cle 9taking care to take the negative of the number if
the arro+ is traversed back+ards:5 The !rbitrage Theorem then $ields:
')*: !n assignment to the arro+s is a #otential difference if and onl$ if it adds
to 1ero around an$ c$cle5
Assemb$ies of Gears or (hee$s
! train of gears 9or +heels: that +ent around in a circle +ould be #erfectl$ useless2 but it #rovides
an amusing e%am#le of an arbitrage&free condition5 "ear ratios multi#l$ along a gear train so this
e%am#le uses the arbitrage theorem in its multi#licative form5 !ngular velocities on the shafts
#la$ the role of the commodit$ #rices5 If angular velocities can be assigned to the shafts so that
their ,uotients are the gear ratios2 then the +hole gear assembl$ can move5 0ther+ise it +ould be
rigid5 Thus a gear assembl$ has a motion if and onl$ if the #roduct of gear ratios around an$
circular gear train is one5
B$ #lacing t+o or more gears on the same shaft2 a circular gear train need not have all the gears in
the same #lane5 But if all the gears are in the same #lace 9e5g52 if the$ are all l$ing on a table:2
then the #roduct of gear ratios around an$ circle +ill al+a$s be #lus one 9even number of gears in
the circle: or minus one 9odd number of gears in the circle:5 Thus a circular gear train +ith all the
gears in the same #lane can move if and onl$ if it has an even number of gears5 "ra#hic artists
sometimes dra+ a sim#le #icture of three gears meshing in a circle2 and some organi1ations have
even used such an image as their logo5 But such a gear train is a #erfect e%am#le of gridlock
since it cannot move5
)
Figure 4. ! 3igid Circular Wheel !ssembl$
D
C$i*ue Formation in +ocia$ Groups
The arbitrage condition a##lied to 7likes7 and 7dislikes7 in social grou#s might give some insight
into the ethnic mentalit$ +here likes and dislikes are based largel$ on being inside or outside of
the cli,ue2 clan2 or tribe5 Each node in the gra#h is a #erson and each arro+ has K< or ;<
according to +hether the #erson at the tail of the arro+ likes or dislikes the #erson at the head of
the arro+5 Then a gra#h is said to be 7balanced7 if it is arbitrage&free in the sense of the likes and
dislikes multi#l$ing to K< around an$ circle Be5g52 .arar$ <CD>2 .arar$2 4orman and Cart+right
<CFDE5 The classic 7mother&in&la+ triangle7 is an e%am#le of an unbalanced gra#h5
other&in&*a+
.usband Wife
K<
K<
&<
Figure . !n 7Lnbalanced7 -ocial "rou#
! 7#rice s$stem7 marks each node or #erson +ith K< or ;<2 and a given #attern of likes and
dislikes is derived from such a marking if each #erson likes others +ith the same marking and
dislikes those +ith a different marking5 Then the arbitrage theorem gives the follo+ing result5
! social grou# +ith a given #attern of likes and dislikes can be #artitioned into t+o
clans such that all likes are intraclan and all dislikes are bet+een clans if and onl$ if
the #attern of likes and dislikes is balanced 9arbitrage&free:5
Thus there is no +a$ to grou# the three #eo#le in the mother&in&la+ triangle into t+o families to
account for the likes and dislikes5 The husband and mother&in&la+ 9+ife(s mother: have to be in
different families to account for their dislike2 but then the +ife has an identit$ crisis5 When
arbitrage is #ossible then2 in effect2 a commodit$ has t+o #rices 9so one can bu$ lo+ and sell
high:5 In the #revious e%am#le2 a +heel had to rotate in t+o directions at once in order for the
+heel assembl$ to move5 In this e%am#le2 the #attern of likes and dislikes in the mother&in&la+
triangle #uts the +ife in the #osition of having t+o conflicting famil$ identities5
,eat Arbitrage in Thermodynamics
The Carnot engine a##roach to the second la+ of thermod$namics 9sim#lified for a finite number
of tem#eratures: gives an a##lication of the arbitrage theorem in #h$sics5 Each node is a heat
reservoir +ith a different tem#erature 9including for calibration #ur#oses the free1ing and boiling
#oints of +ater:5 Each arro+ is a Carnot engine that can reversibl$ +ithdra+ the heat dJ
c
from
the lo+&tem#erature reservoir b$ #erforming the +ork dW2 and dum# the heat dJ
h
into the hotter
reservoir +here dJ
h
G dW K dJ
c
b$ the first la+ of thermod$namics 9conservation of energ$:5
The ratio r G dJ
c
IdJ
h
is called the efficiency debit and is the #ositive real number assigned to the
arro+5 When Carnot engines are hooked in series2 the com#osite efficienc$ debit is the #roduct of
the efficienc$ debits of the individual engines5
F
.ot
Cold
dJ
h
dJ
c
dW dJ
h
dJ
c
r G I
Figure !. ! Carnot Engine
0ne formulation of the second la+ of thermod$namics is that bet+een an$ t+o tem#eratures2
there is #ath inde#endence in the sense that the various connecting #aths must have the same
efficienc$ debit Be5g52 orse <CF?2 D0E5 0ther+ise one could #erform a t$#e of 7heat arbitrage7
9move heat from the cold to hot reservoir +ith no net e%#enditure of energ$: and have a
7#er#etual motion machine of the second kind7 Be5g52 Castellan <CF?2 Cha#ter =E5 B$ the
arbitrage theorem2 the second la+ im#lies that there e%ists a thermod$namic 7#rice7 T at each
node or reservoir such that the efficienc$ debit of each Carnot engine is the 7#rice ratio7
T
cold
IT
hot
5 If +e normali1e the free1ing #oint of +ater to 0 and the boiling #oint to <002 then the
7#rices7 are the 'elvin absolute tem#eratures of the reservoirs5
Arbitrage in -robabi$ity Theory
7aking book7 means making a series of bets so that one has #ositive net earnings no matter
+hat ha##ens5 That is e,uivalent to #erforming #rofitable arbitrage on the market for contingent
commodities5 ! contingent commodit$ is a commodit$ conditioned on the occurrence of an
event2 e5g52 M<000 if $our number comes u# in a lotter$5 ! #erson subAectivel$ assigns a
#robabilit$ #9E: to an event E if the #erson is Aust +illing to #a$ #9E:- in order to receive the
stake - if the event E occurs5 Thus #9E: is the #rice the #erson is +illing to #a$ for the
contingent commodit$ 7M< if E57 -u##ose that a bettor #laces t+o bets +ith a bookie: the bettor
#a$s M< to get M2 if it is raining at noon2 and #a$s M<50D to get M2 if it is not raining at noon5 B$
taking both bets2 the bookie 7makes book57 4o matter +hat ha##ens2 the bookie gives u# M2 and
receives M250D 9G <500K<50D: for a net #rofit of M50D5 The bettor(s #robabilit$ assignments are
said to be coherent if book cannot be made against the bettor 9unlike the e%am#le:5 3amse$
B<CF0 9orig5 <C2F:E and de Finetti B<CF? 9orig5 <C>@:E sho+ed that the la+s of #robabilit$ theor$2
such as #9E: K #9not&E: G <2 could be derived from the re,uirement of coherence5 !rbitrage on
the market for contingent commodities enforces the la+s of #robabilit$5 Even if each #erson has
coherent #robabilit$ Audgments2 bookies can still make their living off the combined incoherence
of different #eo#le(s #robabilit$ Audgments5
Arbitrage and Optimization Theory
! sim#le e%am#le of an o#timi1ation #roblem +ill no+ be used to illustrate our main to#ic2 the
inter#retation of the necessar$ conditions for o#timi1ation as an arbitrage&free condition5
-u##ose that the #roblem is to find the #ro#ortions for a rectangular fenced field of ma%imum
area for a given cost +hen one length of the field re,uires a form of fencing costing four times the
fencing used on the other three sides5
@
M? #er foot
M< #er foot
on other three sides
Width
G W ft5
*ength
G * ft5
Figure ". a%imi1e 3ectangular !rea +ith "iven Cost
There are t+o commodities on the market2 cost dollars and s,uare feet of area5 There are t+o
+a$s to transform an e%tra dollar into area: s#end the dollar to increase the +idth of the field or
to increase the length of the field5 If the dollar is s#ent on the +idth2 then it bu$s an e%tra half
foot on the +idth 9the e%tra foot needs to be s#lit bet+een the t+o +idths to kee# the rectangular
sha#e: so the area goes from W* to 9W K <I2:*5 .ence the e%tra area is *I25 If the dollar is
s#ent on the length2 then onl$ one&fifth of a foot can be added to the length 9M5=0 for one&fifth
foot on the e%#ensive side and M520 for one&fifth foot on the chea# side:5 Thus the area is
increased from W* to W9* K <ID: and the e%tra area is WID5 .ence there are t+o e%change rates
from the cost dollars to the s,uare feet of area are *I2 and WID5 This 7market7 can be #ictured in
an 7arbitrage diagram57
Cost Dollars -,uare Feet of !rea
*I2
WID
Figure #. !rbitrage Diagram for a%imum !rea /roblem
This market is arbitrage&free if and onl$ if the t+o e%change rates bet+een the commodities are
e,ual: *I2 G WID5 .ence the ma%imum area field is obtained +hen the length is t+o&fifths or ?0
#ercent of the +idth5 When formulated as a constrained ma%imi1ation #roblem 9ma%imi1e area
subAect to a fi%ed cost:2 that common rate *I2 G WID is the *agrange multi#lier for the #roblem5
ArbitrageFree Conditions on Market Graphs
The value grou# T +ill no+ be s#eciali1ed to 3H2 the multi#licative grou# of non1ero real
numbers5 But #rice s$stems / +ill no+ be e$tended b$ allo+ing 1ero values in the reals 32 i5e52
/:"
0
35
!n e%tended #rice s$stem / and a rate s$stem r are associated if for an$ arc A2
/9h9A::r
A
; /9t9A:: G 05
=
If the #rice s$stem has all non1ero values2 this is the same as the rate s$stem being derived from
the #rice s$stem5
The 1ero&#rice s$stem 9all 1ero #rices: is triviall$ associated +ith an$ rate s$stem5 If a rate s$stem
is not arbitrage&free2 then the 1ero&#rice s$stem is the onl$ associated #rice s$stem5 With that
fi%ed&rate s$stem2 #rofitable arbitrage means 7getting something for nothing27 so all commodities
become free goods and have 1ero #rices5
It is useful to reformulate some of the gra#h&theoretic notions using incidence matrices5 "iven
9"2r:2 the node-arc incidence matri$ - G B-
iA
E is the 9mK<: b matri% +here:
-
iA

+ r
A
if
!rc A

< if
!rc A

0 0ther+ise

'





4ode i
4ode i
Equation 2. 4ode&!rc Incidence atri%
The A
th
column of - has a minus one 9;<: and a rate r
A2
+hich are the results of transforming one
unit of the t9A: good into r
A
units of the h9A: good5 !n$ linear combination of the columns +ould
re#resent a #ossible market&e%change vector using the rate s$stem r5 The negative com#onents
re#resent the goods given u# in e%change for the goods re#resented b$ the #ositive com#onents5
Thus the vector s#ace of all linear combinations of columns of -2 the column space Col9-:2 +ill be
called the e$change space of the market gra#h 9"2r:5
*et -
0
2 called the reduced incidence matri$2 be the m b matri% obtained from - b$ deleting the
to# ro+2 the ro+ corres#onding to node 05 If " is a connected gra#h 9a #ath bet+een an$ t+o
nodes:2 then the reduced incidence matri% -
0
has linearl$ inde#endent ro+s2 i5e52 -
0
has full ro+
rank5 *et /H G 9/
<
25552/
m
: be a ro+ vector such that /H-
0
G 05 -ome node i +as connected to
the 7deleted7 node 0 b$ some arc A5 In order for /H to 1ero the A
th
column of -
0
2 /
i
must be 1ero5
If arc A is from node i to i( both in the node set Ni25552mO2 then /H-
0
G 0 im#lies /
i(
r
A
; /
i
G 0 so /
i(

and /
i
are both 1ero or both non1ero5 Thus each node connected to node i must have a 1ero
#rice5 -ince " is connected2 all #rices must be 1ero2 i5e52 /H G 02 so the ro+s of -
0
are linearl$
inde#endent5
!dding back the to# ro+2 the ro+ rank of - is either m or mK<2 so the column rank2 i5e52 the
dimension of Col9-:2 is also either m or mK<5 ! subs#ace of 3
mK<
of dimension m 9one less than
the dimension of the full s#ace: is a hyperplane through the origin5 Thus the e%change s#ace is
either a h$#er#lane in 3
mK<
or is the full s#ace5
The left nullspace *eft4ull9-: of an$ matri% - is the s#ace of vectors / such that /- G 05 If - is
the incidence matri% of a market gra#h 9"2r: and / G 9/
0
2/
<
25552/
m
: is in *eft4ull9-:2 i5e52 /- G 02
then for all arcs A
/
h9A:
r
A
; /
t9A:
G 0
so / is a #rice s$stem associated +ith the rate s$stem r5 .ence *eft4ull9-: is called the price
space associated +ith the e%change s#ace Col9-: and the elements / are called price vectors5 The
C
e%change s#ace Col9-: and the #rice s#ace *eft4ull9-: are orthogonal complements of one
another2 i5e52
a5 P is an e%change if and onl$ if for an$ #rice vector /2 /P G 02 and
b5 / is a #rice vector if and onl$ if for an$ e%change P2 /P G 05
-ince the$ are orthogonal com#lements2 dimBCol9-:E K dimB*eft4ull9-:E G mK<5 -ince the
e%change s#ace is of dimension m or mK< 9" is assumed connected:2 the dimension of the #rice
s#ace is either one or 1ero5 ! #rice vector +ith an$ non1ero com#onents must have all non1ero
com#onents5 !n$ t+o non1ero #rice vectors must be scalar multi#les on one another5 The t+o
cases of a one or 1ero dimensional #rice s#ace corres#ond to the cases of 9"2r: being arbitrage&
free or allo+ing #rofitable arbitrage5 If #rofitable arbitrage is #ossible2 then the fi%ed non1ero
e%change rates r +ould allo+ one to generate an$ ,uantities of the goods so all commodities are
free goods2 i5e52 / G 0 is the onl$ #rice vector5 These results and some eas$ conse,uences are
collected together in the follo+ing theorem5
Arbitrage Theorem for Market Graphs: *et 9"2r: be a market gra#h +here " is connected
and r:"
<
3H5 The follo+ing conditions are e,uivalent:
<5 there e%ists a #rice s$stem /:"
0
3H such that J9/: G r2
25 the rate s$stem r is #ath&inde#endent2
>5 the rate s$stem r is arbitrage&free2
?5 the #rice s#ace *eft4ull9-: is one&dimensional2
D5 the e%change s#ace Col9-: is a h$#er#lane 9+ith a non1ero #rice vector as a normal vector:2
F5 the to# ro+ of -2 s
0
2 can be e%#ressed as a linear combination of the bottom m ro+s -
0
of -2
i5e52 there e%ist Q G 9Q
<
25552Q
m
: such that s
0
K Q-
0
G 02 and
@5 if an e%change vector b G -% has b
<
G 555 G b
m
G 02 then b
0
G 05
The incidence&matri% treatment of market gra#hs suggests a generali1ation of the economic
inter#retation to a more general matri% conte%t5 The ro+s re#resent commodities5 The columns
s#ecif$ e%change or #roduction #ossibilities5 4egative entries re#resent goods given u# in
e%change or in#uts to #roduction2 +hile #ositive com#onents stand for goods received or the
out#uts5 !n$ scalar multi#le2 #ositive or negative2 of a column also re#resents a #ossible
e%change or transformation so the column s#ace is the s#ace of #ossible e%changes or
transformations5 The orthogonall$ com#lementar$ left nulls#ace is the set of #rice vectors such
that all the e%changes can be obtained as trades at those #rices Bfor more linear algebra2 see an$
te%t such as -trang <C=0E5
An "conomic Interpretation of Cofactors. /eterminants. and Cramer%s 0u$e
*et ! be a s,uare 9mK<: 9mK<: of reals2 and let !9k: be the 9mK<: m matri% obtained b$
deleting column k for k G 02<25552m5 The column s#ace Col9!9k:: is the s#ace of e%changes
s#anned b$ the remaining m columns5 *et
/9k: G 9/
0
9k:2/
<
9k:25552/
m
9k::
<0
be the cofactors of the deleted column k5 B$ the #ro#ert$ of 7e%#ansion b$ alien cofactors27
/9k:!9k: G 0 so /9k: is a 7#rice vector7 in *eft4ull9!9k::5 The cofactors in /9k: +ill be called
the k-prices. The cofactors of an$ column of ! are #rices so that the e%changes defined b$ the
remaining columns can be obtained at those market #rices5
4o+ introduce the e%change 9or #roductive: #ossibilities given b$ the deleted column k into the
market5 Its value at the reigning #rices /9k: is the determinant R!R obtained b$ the cofactor
e%#ansion of column k5 If R!R 0 then an$ vector b can be obtained as an e%change vector
!% G b5 !s in a market that allo+s #rofitable arbitrage at fi%ed e%change rates2 an$ e%change is
allo+ed and the onl$ #rice vector is the 1ero vector5
It is therefore desirable to alter tem#oraril$ the inter#retation of the columns of !5 /reviousl$ the
columns re#resented e%change or #roduction #ossibilities +ith all commodities involved as in#uts
or out#uts listed as com#onents5 We no+ inter#ret each column as re#resenting the reversible
in#ut&out#ut vector of a machine o#erating at unit level5 But the machine(s services are not
re#resented in the in#ut&out#ut vector2 so the value of the vector can no+ be inter#reted as the
com#etitive rent im#uted to a unit of the machine services5
The vector of cofactor k&#rices /9k: G 9/
0
9k:2/
<
9k:25552/
m
9k:: can no+ be inter#reted as a set of
commodit$ #rices that im#ute 1ero rents to all the other m machines 9e%cluding the k
th
machine:5
The determinant R!R is the com#etitive rent 9or subsid$2 if negative: im#uted to the unit services
of machine k at those k&#rices5 Dividing b$ the determinant&as&rent2 the normali%ed k-prices are
the k&#rices e%#ressed in terms of the units of machine k services as numeraire5
( )
( )
/ k
/ k
!
H
Equation 3. /rices to "ive Lnit 3ent to achine k2 Sero 3ent to 0ther achines
!t the normali1ed k&#rices /H9k:2 all machines have 1ero im#uted rentTsave machine k2 +hich
has an im#uted rent of unit$5 This $ields an economic inter#retation of the inverse matri$ !
;<
as
the normali%ed price matri$ obtained as the column of ro+ vectors /H9k: for k G 02<25552m5
( )
( )
( )
<
!
m H /
< H /
0 H /
H /

1
1
1
1
]
1

Equation 4. Inverse atri% as atri% of 4ormali1ed /rice )ectors


-u##ose the machines are o#erated at the levels % G 9%
0
2%
<
25552%
m
:
T
so the net #roduct vector is
!% G b5 In competitive equilibrium2 the com#etitive rents due on the machines must e,ual the
value of the net #roduct vector leaving no #ure #rofits for arbitrageurs5 "iven a commodit$ #rice
vector / G 9/
0
2/
<
25552/
m
:2 the unit machine rents 3 G 93
0
23
<
255523
m
: must be such that the total
rent 3% e,uals the value /b of an$ net #roduct b G !%2 i5e52
3% G /b G /!% for an$ %5
<<
Equation . achine 3ent G )alue of 4et /roduct in Com#etitive E,uilibrium
Thus com#etitive e,uilibrium re,uires the com#etitive rents 3 G /! in terms of /5
4o+ consider the s#ecific #rice vector /H9k:5 The com#etitive rents 3 G /H9k:! im#ute a rent
onl$ to machine k2 and that rent is unit$5 .ence the total rent 3% G %
k
G /H9k:!% G /H9k:b is the
level of o#eration %
k
of machine k so +e have derived Cramer(s 3ule5
Com#etitive achine 3ent G %
k
G /H9k:b G )alue of 4et /roduct5
Equation !. Cramer(s 3ule as a Com#etitive E,uilibrium Condition
ArbitrageFree Market Matrices
We no+ return to the 7full&disclosure7 inter#retation of the columns of !5 !ll commodities and
services involved in the e%change or #roductive transformation are e%#osed as com#onents of the
column vectors5
When is a matri% like a market8 0ne ans+er is +hen it is like the node&arc incidence matri% of a
market gra#h5 *et ! be a rectangular 9mK<: n matri% +ith mK< n5 !n$ matri% or its
trans#ose has that form5 -uch a matri% ! is a market matri$ if rank9!: m5 ! market matri% has
a rank of m or mK<5 ! market matri% ! is said to be arbitrage-free if rank9!: G m5 The node&arc
incidence matri% of a connected market gra#h is a market matri%5 The market gra#h is arbitrage&
free 9as a gra#h: if and onl$ if its incidence matri% is arbitrage&free 9as a matri%:5
! market matri% has m linearl$ inde#endent ro+s that2 for notational convenience2 +e ma$ take to
be the bottom m ro+s numbered i G <25552m 9the to# ro+ is ro+ 0:5 Ever$ set of m columns from
the 9mK<: n matri% ! determine a 9mK<: m submatri% !H 9taking the columns in the same
order as in !:5 !s a visual aid2 +e can consider a 9mK<: < 7dumm$7 column vector B828255528E
T

a##ended to the left of !H to form a mK< s,uare matri%5 The cofactors /
0
2 /
<
2 5552 /
m
of the
dumm$ column are the local cofactor prices determined b$ the m columns of !H5 The binomial
coefficient C9n2m: G nUI9mU9n;m:U: gives the number of +a$s of choosing m columns from among
n columns2 so there are C9n2m: vectors of local cofactor #rices 9not necessaril$ all distinct:5
!t least one vector of local cofactor #rices is non1ero since rank9!: m5 The ro+s have been
arranged so the bottom m ro+s are linearl$ inde#endent5 *et !H be a submatri% of m linearl$
inde#endent columns so it has a vector of local cofactor #rices /H G 9/
0
H2 /
<
H2 5552 /
m
H: such that
/
0
H 05 These cofactor #rices ma$ be normali1ed b$ taking commodit$ 0 as the numeraire to
obtain the relative #rices:
9<2Q
<
25552Q
m
: G 9<2 /
<
HI/
0
H2 5552 /
m
HI/
0
H:5
Equation ". 4ormali1ed Cofactor /rices
To com#lete the develo#ment of a 7market7 in the market matri% !2 +e need to define
transformation rates bet+een commodities5 The im#ortant rates are the transformation rates r
i
of
good i into good 0 for i G <25552m2 +hich can be defined using an$ m linearl$ inde#endent columns
!H5 The m activities are to be run at levels so that e%actl$ one unit of good i is used&u# and 1ero
units of good A are #roduced or used u# for A i205 Then the number of units of good 0 #roduced
<2
gives the transformation rate r
i
so that the < unit of good i used u# is transformed into r
i
units of
good 05
In matri% notation2 let !
0
H be the bottom m ro+s of a 9mK<: m matri% !H of m linearl$
inde#endent columns of ! so that
R!
0
HR G /
0
H 05
*et a
0
H be the to# ro+ of !H5 The activit$ vector % that uses u# e%actl$ one unit of good i is the
% such that
!
0
H% G 902555202;<20255520:
T
G ;I
i
+here I
i
is the i
th
column of the m m identit$ matri% I so % G ;9!
0
H:
;<
I
i
5 *et
r
i
G a
0
% G ;a
0
H9!
0
H:
;<
I
i
Equation #. Transformation 3ate of i
th
"ood into 4umeraire 0
th
"ood
so the vector r G 9r
<
25552r
m
: of the transformation rates defined b$ !H is r G ;a
0
H9!
0
H:
;<
5
Cofactor /rice Theorem: "iven an$ 9mK<: m submatri% !H of linearl$ inde#endent columns2
the transformation rates r determined b$ !H are e,ual to the normali1ed cofactor #rices:
9r
<
25552r
m
: G 9/
<
HI/
0
H25552/
m
HI/
0
H: G 9Q
<
25552Q
m
:5
/roof: For notational sim#licit$2 +e take the m columns of !H to be the first m columns of !5 For
the % used above in the definition of r
i
2 +e have the follo+ing:
5
0
<
0
r
%
a a
a a
a a
a a
i
mm < m
im < i
m < <<
m 0 0<
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
]
1

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
]
1

.ence the 9mK<: % 9mK<: matri% obtained b$ adding the 3.- column vector as the mK<
st
column
is singular5 Thus its determinant obtained b$ the cofactor e%#ansion of the mK<
st
column is 1ero2
i5e52 /
0
Hr
i
; /
i
H G 0 so r
i
G /
i
HI/
0
H5
The ne%t theorem states a number of conditions e,uivalent to the market matri% ! being
arbitrage&free5 !n arbitrage&free market has uni,ue relative #rices so the C9n2m: local cofactor
#rices must mesh or fit together in the sense of being scalar multi#les of the non1ero #rice vector
/H +hich +as normali1ed to 9<2Q
<
25552Q
m
:5 The s#ace s#anned b$ the C9n2m: cofactor #rice
vectors is the one&dimensional s#ace *eft4ull9!:5 In the a##lication to classical o#timi1ation2 the
Q
i
(s are the *agrange multi#liers of m constraints2 +hich are thus inter#reted as the uni,ue #rices
of m resources in terms of the ma%imand as numeraire5
<>
!rbitrage Theorem for arket atrices: *et ! be an$ 9mK<: n market matri% +here +e
assume the ro+s < through m are linearl$ inde#endent5 *et a
0
be the to# ro+2 and let !
0
be the
bottom m ro+s of !5 The follo+ing conditions are e,uivalent:
<5 ! is arbitrage&free2
25 the #rice s#ace *eft4ull9!: is one&dimensional2
>5 the e%change s#ace Col9!: is a h$#er#lane 9+ith a cofactor #rice vector as a normal vector:2
?5 there e%ists Q G 9Q
<
25552Q
m
: such that a
0
K Q!
0
G 02 and
D5 if an e%change vector b G !% has b
<
G 555 G b
m
G 02 then b
0
G 05 B-ee Ellerman <CC0 for the
#roof5E
FirstOrder 1ecessary Conditions as ArbitrageFree Conditions
The intuitive arbitrage reasoning as +ell as the formal results for arbitrage&free market matrices
can be a##lied to $ield the first&order necessar$ conditions for regular constrained o#timi1ation
#roblems +ith e,ualit$ constraints5
Consider the one&constraint #roblem:
a%imi1e $ G f9%
<
25552%
n
:
-ubAect to: g9%
<
25552%
n
: G b
+here all functions are continuousl$ t+ice differentiable5 There are t+o commodities2 the
resource b and the ma%imand $5 There are n 7instruments7 +ith the levels of o#eration %
<
25552%
n
5
!t the levels %
<
25552%
n
2 the amount of the resource used&u# is g9%
<
25552%
n
:2 and f9%
<
25552%
n
: is the
amount of the ma%imand #roduced5
*et %
o
G 9%
<
o
25552%
n
o
: be levels of the instruments that use u# all of the available resource2 i5e52
g9%
<
o
25552%
n
o
: G b5 oreover2 +e assume that %
o
is 7regular7 in the sense that not all the #artials
g9%
o
:I%
i
G g
i
are 1ero5 We consider an intuitive 7marginal market7 defined b$ the #ossible
marginal transformations of b into $5 In an international currenc$ market 9+ithout transaction
costs:2 there might be n banks or e%change houses that to #revent arbitrage +ould have to offer
the same rate of e%change bet+een an$ t+o currencies5 In our market2 the n instrument variables
offer n +a$s to transform the resource b into the ma%imand $5 ! marginal variation %
i
uses&u#
g
i
%
i
units of b and #roduces f
i
%
i
units of $ so the rate of transformation is
b $
f %
g %
f
g
i i
i i
i
i

Equation &. 3ate of Transformation of 3esource into a%imand


The market is arbitrage&free if and onl$ if the n transformation rates f
i
Ig
i
#rovided b$ the n
instruments are e,ual +here the common rate of transformation is the *agrange multi#lier Q5
<?

n
n
2
2
<
<
g
f
g
f
g
f

Equation 1'. !rbitrage&Free Condition


$
b
Q
f Ig
< <
n n
f Ig
2 2
f Ig
Figure &. !rbitrage Diagram for the arginal arket
Thus the first&order necessar$ conditions for %
o
to be a constrained ma%imum are e,uivalent to
the intuitive market being arbitrage&free5
To use the machiner$ of market matrices2 let
1
]
1

n 2 <
n 2 <
g g g
f f f
!

+here ;g
i
is used instead of Kg
i
since g9%
<
25552%
n
: re#resents the amount of the resource used u#5
Consider an$ column of this market matri% cou#led +ith the dumm$ column to form a s,uare
matri%:
8
8
5
f
g
i
i

1
]
1
The cofactors of the dumm$ column are the local #rices /
$
G ;g
i
and /
b
G ;f
i
2 so 9assuming
g
i
0: the cofactor #rice ratio is the transformation rate defined b$ the marginal variations in the
instrument %
i
5
b $
/ / f g
b $ i i

Equation 11. Transformation as Cofactor /rice 3atio


-ince m G <2 there are C9n2<: G n sets of cofactor #rices5 The market matri% is arbitrage&free if
and onl$ if the n cofactor #rice vectors define the same #rice of b in terms of $ 9i5e5 the condition
of E,uation <0:5
<D
For the #revious e%am#le of ma%imi1ing the area of the rectangular field using different t$#es of
fencing2 the mathematicall$ formulated #roblem is:
a%imi1e $ G %
<
%
2
-ubAect to: 2%
<
K D%
2
G b5
The market matri% is:
!
f f
g g
% %

1
]
1

1
]
1
< 2
< 2
2 <
2 D
and the cofactor #rice ratios are given b$ the cofactors of the dumm$ columns in the matrices:
8
8
8
8
5
%
or
%
< 2
D 2

1
]
1

1
]
1
The mathematicall$ defined 7market7 is arbitrage&free if all the cofactor #rice ratios are the same:
/
/
% %
b
$

< 2
D 2
+hich gives the #revious necessar$ conditions that the length %
2
must be t+o&fifths or ?0 #ercent
of the +idth %
<
5
Consider a #roblem +ith m G 2 constraints:
a%imi1e $ G f9%
<
25552%
n
:
-ubAect to: g
<
9%
<
25552%
n
: G b
<
g
2
9%
<
25552%
n
: G b
2
+here n V m G 25 *et " be the matri% of #artials of the constraints evaluated at %
o
:
5
g g g
g g g
"
2
n
2
2
2
<
<
n
<
2
<
<
1
]
1

The candidate #oint %


o
is assumed to be regular in the sense that " is of full ro+ rank5
There are three commodities in the intuitive market for the #roblem: the ma%imand $ and the t+o
resources b
<
and b
2
5 To define a transformation rate from b
<
into $2 one cannot Aust var$ one
instrument %
i
because that ma$ also var$ b
2
5 0ne must consider variations in 9m: t+o variables %
i

and %
A
+hich leave b
2
constant and $ield variations ;db
<
and d$ to define a transformation rate r
<

G d$Idb
<
from b
<
into $5 The rate for transforming b
2
into $ can be similarl$ defined5 Lsing the
cofactor #rice theorem2 these rates can be obtained as ratios of local cofactor #rices5
<F
-ince " is of full ro+ rank2 there are m G 2 instruments %
i
and %
A
such that
"
g g
g g
i A
i A
H

1
]
1
1
< <
2 2
is nonsingular5 "iven the matri% 9+ith the unkno+n dumm$ column:
8
8
8
f f
g g
g g
i A
i A
i A

1
]
1
1
1
1
< <
2 2
the cofactors of the dumm$ column $ield the #rices:
/ g g g g
/ f g f g
/ f g f g
$ i A i A
b i A A i
b A i i A



< 2 2 <
2 2
< <
<
2
Equation 12. Cofactor /rices
+here /
$
0 b$ the choice of i and A5 B$ the cofactor #rice theorem2 the cofactor #rice ratios
$ield the transformation rates from the resources into the ma%imand5 For instance2 if %
i
and %
A
are
varied to hold b
2
constant2 the relative cofactor #rice of b
<
in terms of $2 /
b
<
I/
$
G Q
<
2 gives the
rate of transformation of b
<
into $ defined b$ the variation in %
i
and %
A
5
For the intuitive market to be arbitrage&free2 all the local cofactor #rices 9/
$
(2/
b
<
(2/
b
2
(: defined b$
an$ set of m G 2 instruments must be scalar multi#les of the non1ero #rice vector 9/
$
2/
b
<
2/
b
2
:5 In
formal terms2 the market matri% defined b$ the #roblem is
!
f
"

1
]
1
5
The first&order necessar$ conditions for the candidate #oint to be a constrained ma%imum are then
e%#ressed b$ the market matri% ! being arbitrage&free and b$ the other e,uivalent conditions
given in the !rbitrage Theorem for arket atrices5
!ll these results for m G 2 e%tend to the general #roblem +ith m constraints and n variables
9n V m::
<@
a%imi1e $ G f9%
<
25552%
n
:
-ubAect to: g
<
9%
<
25552%
n
: G b
<
W
g
m
9%
<
25552%
n
: G b
m
5
The candidate #oint %
o
satisfies the constraints and is regular in the sense that the m n matri% "
G B g
A
i
E is of full ro+ rank5 Thus there are m columns forming a nonsingular submatri% "H5 If fH
is the vector of the corres#onding m #artials of f2 then consider the 9mK<: 9mK<: matri%:
8 H
8 H
5
f
"

1
]
1
The cofactors of the dumm$ column form the local cofactor #rices /
$
2/
b
<
25552/
b
m
determined b$
the m chosen instruments5 The intuitive market is arbitrage&free if all the C9m2n: vectors of local
cofactor #rices are scalar multi#les of this non1ero vector5 In formal terms2 the first&order
necessar$ condition for the candidate #oint %
o
to be a constrained ma%imum is e,uivalent to the
condition that the market matri% of the #roblem
!
f
"

1
]
1
is arbitrage&free2 +hich in turn is e,uivalent to the other conditions stated in the !rbitrage
Theorem for arket atrices5
These results #oint to a research #rogram that could be develo#ed in several directions5 0ne
direction is to sho+ ho+ the second&order sufficient conditions for o#timalit$ could be inter#reted
economicall$ as the conditions for arbitrage to eliminate its o+n #ossibilit$5 /reliminar$ results in
this direction are outlined in the a##endi%5 !nother direction of develo#ment is to e%tend the
arbitrage inter#retation to other areas of o#timi1ation theor$ such as o#timi1ation +ith ine,ualit$
constraints and o#timal control theor$5
0eferences
Berge2 Claude2 and !5 "houila&.ouri2 <CFD5 (rogramming) *ames and +ransportation
,et-orks. Xohn 4e+ 6ork: Wile$ and -ons5
Castellan2 "ilbert5 <CF?5 (hysical .hemistry. 4e+ 6ork: !ddison&Wesle$5
Cournot2 !ugustin5 <=C@ 9orig5 <=>=:5 /athematical (rinciples of the +heory of 0ealth Trans5
4athaniel Bloom5 4e+ 6ork: acmillan5
de Finetti2 Bruno5 <CF? 9orig5 <C>@:5 7Foresight1 2ts 3ogical 3a-s) 2ts 4ub5ective 4ources5 In
4tudies in 4ub5ective (robability ed5 .5 '$burg and .5 -mokler2 C>&<D=5 4e+ 6ork:
Xohn Wile$5
<=
Ellerman2 David /5 <C=?5 7!rbitrage Theor$: ! athematical Introduction57 426/ 7evie-5 2F:
2?<&F<5
Ellerman2 David /5 <CC05 7!n !rbitrage Inter#retation of Classical 0#timi1ation57
/etroeconomica ?<2 no5 >: 2DC&@F5
"ross2 Xonathan5 <C@?5 7)oltage gra#hs57 8iscrete /ath C: 2>C&?F5
.arar$2 Frank5 <CD>5 70n the notion of balance of a signed gra#h57 /ichigan /ath. 9. 2: <?>&
?F5
.arar$2 Frank2 35 S5 4orman2 and D5 Cart+right5 <CFD5 4tructural /odels5 4e+ 6ork: Xohn
Wile$5
.arar$2 Frank2 B5 *indstrom2 and .5 Setterstrom5 <C=25 70n balance in grou# gra#hs57
,et-orks <2: ><@&2<5
'irchhoff2 "5 <=?@5 7Yber die !uflosung der "leichungen2 auf +elche man dei der Lntersuchung
der linearen )erteilung galvanischer -trome gefuhrt +ird57 6nnalen der (hysik und
.hemie @2: ?C@&D0=5
odigliani2 Franco2 and erton .5 iller5 <CD=5 7The Cost of Ca#ital2 Cor#oration Finance2
and the Theor$ of Investment57 6merican Economic 7evie- ?=: 2F<&C@5
orse2 /hili#5 <CF?5 +hermal (hysics5 4e+ 6ork: W5 !5 BenAamin5
3amse$2 Frank /lum#ton5 <CF0 9orig5 <C2F:5 +ruth and probability5 In +he Foundations of
/athematics) ed5 35 B5 Braith+aite5 /aterson 45X5: *ittlefield2 !dams Z Com#an$5
3oss2 -te#hen !5 <C@F5 7The !rbitrage Theor$ of Ca#ital !sset /ricing57 9. Econ. +heory <>:
>?<&F05
3oss2 -te#hen !5 <C@F5 73eturn2 3isk and !rbitrage57 In 7isk and 7eturn in Finance2 ed5 Ir+in
Friend and Xames *5 Bicksler5 Cambridge2 ass5: Ballinger5
-trang2 "ilbert5 <C=05 3inear 6lgebra and its 6pplications5 -econd edition5 4e+ 6ork:
!cademic /ress5
)arian2 .al 35 <C=@5 7The !rbitrage /rinci#le in Financial Economics57 +he 9ournal of
Economic (erspectives <2 no5 2: DD&@25
<C
Appendi#: +econdOrder Conditions as Arbitrage+tabi$ity Conditions
The arbitrage inter#retation e%tends to the second&order sufficient conditions5 There is a natural
stabilit$ notion based on arbitrage5 -tabilit$ re,uires that arbitrage eliminate its o+n #ossibilit$5
The e%change of ! for B tends to reduce the rate of e%change of ! into B5 Thus 7transformation
lo+ers the rate of transformation7 is a arshallian conce#t of 7arbitrage stabilit$57 When a##lied
to the market in the mathematics of classical o#timi1ation2 arbitrage stabilit$ is e,uivalent to the
second&order sufficient conditions5
"iven the demand #rice /
D
9,: and su##l$ #rice /
-
9,: as functions of ,uantit$2 arshallian
stabilit$ re,uires that
dB/
D
9,: ; /
-
9,:EId, G /
D
( ; /
-
( [ 05
arshallian stabilit$ is closel$ related to the stabilit$ notion of arbitrage eliminating its o+n
#ossibilit$5 If /
D
9,: V /
-
9,:2 an arbitrageur could bu$ lo+ at /
-
9,: and sell high at /
D
9,:5
,
M
/
D
-
/
Figure 1'. Circular Transformation Lsing -u##l$ and Demand /rices
In a circular transformation of mone$ into the commodit$ and back into mone$2 the arbitrageur
nets the amount /
D
9,: ; /
-
9,:5 Thus arbitrage +ill tend to eliminate its o+n #ossibilit$ if there is
arshallian stabilit$2 /
D
( ; /
-
( [ 05
Consider a sim#le t+o&variable constrained ma%imi1ation #roblem:
a%imi1e $ G f9%
<
2%
2
:
-ubAect to: g9%
<
2%
2
: G b5
!ll derivatives are evaluated at %
o
2 +hich satisfies the first&order necessar$ conditions5 .ence the
market
b $
f Ig
< <
f Ig
2 2
is arbitrage&free2 i5e5 f
<
Ig
<
G f
2
Ig
2
G Q5
Consider an$ differentiable #arameteri1ation %9t: G 9%
<
9t:2%
2
9t:: defined in a neighborhood of %90:
G %
o
that holds b constant2 i5e52
20
dgIdt G g
<
%
<
( K g
2
%
2
( G 0
9+here the #rime denotes differentiation:5 This variation in the % instruments can be thought of as
a circular transformation of $ into b and back into $5 For instance2 if g
2
%
2
( G ;g
<
%
<
( V 02 then R
f
<
%
<
(R units of $ are used u# and transformed into ;9g
<
If
<
:f
<
%
<
( G ;g
<
%
<
( G g
2
%
2
( units of b2 +hich in
turn are transformed into 9f
2
Ig
2
:g
2
%
2
( G f
2
%
2
( units of $5 The net change in $ is
d$Idt G f
<
%
<
( K f
2
%
2
(5
For this circular transformation2 f
<
Ig
<
is the 7su##l$ #rice7 and f
2
Ig
2
is the 7demand #rice7 of b in
terms of the numeraire $5
b $
f Ig
< <
f Ig
2 2
Figure 11. Circular Transformation in 3esource&a%imand arket
Thus 7arshallian stabilit$7 a##lied in this conte%t re,uires that
dBf
2
Ig
2
; f
<
Ig
<
EIdt [ 05
Evaluating the derivative2 dBf
2
Ig
2
; f
<
Ig
<
EIdt G
Bg
2
9f
2<
%
<
( K f
22
%
2
(: ; f
2
9g
2<
%
<
( K g
22
%
2
(:EIg
2
2
; Bg
<
9f
<<
%
<
( K f
<2
%
2
(: ; f
<
9g
<<
%
<
( K g
<2
%
2
(:EIg
<
2
5
ulti#l$ing through b$ the #ositive b G g
2
%
2
( G ;g
<
%
<
( V 0 and using the first&order conditions2
f
<
Ig
<
G f
2
Ig
2
G Q2 $ields
b dBf
2
Ig
2
; f
<
Ig
<
EIdt G
9f
2<
;Qg
2<
:%
<
(%
2
( K 9f
22
;Qg
22
:%
2
(
2
K 9f
<<
;Qg
<<
:%
<
(
2
K 9f
<2
;Qg
<2
:%
<
(%
2
( G
( )
% %
* *
* *
%
%
< 2
<< <2
2< 22
<
2
0
( (
(
(

1
]
1

_
,

<
for an$ 9%
<
(2%
2
(: such that g
<
%
<
( K g
2
%
2
( G 02 +here * is the *agrangian function
*9%
<
2%
2
2Q: G f9%
<
2%
2
: K QBb ; g9%
<
2%
2
:E5
Thus the 7arshallian stabilit$7 conditions ada#ted to this arbitrage conte%t $ield the usual
second&order sufficient conditions for a ma%imum5
The #roblem +ith arshallian stabilit$ conditions is the generali1ation to multi#le markets5 This
#roblem has a sim#le solution +hen reconce#tuali1ed in the arbitrage conte%t5 Instead of vie+ing
f
2
Ig
2
; f
<
Ig
<
as the difference bet+een the 7demand #rice7 and 7su##l$ #rice27 vie+ it as the net
2<
change in $ +hen f
<
Ig
<
units of $ are transformed into 9f
<
Ig
<
:9g
<
If
<
: G < unit of b2 +hich in turn is
transformed into <9f
2
Ig
2
: units of $ for the net change of $ G f
2
Ig
2
; f
<
Ig
<
5
In the circular transformation #reviousl$ described2 Rf
<
%
<
(R units of $ +ere transformed back into
f
2
%
2
( units for the net change d$Idt G f
<
%
<
(K f
2
%
2
(5 ! circular transformation is described b$ an$
variation %9t: +hich leaves b constant2 i5e52 g
<
%
<
( K g
2
%
2
( G 05 ! circular transformation defined in
a neighborhood of a critical #oint %
o
$ields no net change in $2 i5e52 f
i
%
i
( G 05 !rbitrage eliminates
its o+n #ossibilit$ if the rate of change of that net amount is negative5 Thus2 a critical #oint %
o
is
said to have arbitrage stability if for an$ circular transformation defined in a neighborhood of %
o
2
dBf
i
%
i
(EIdt [ 05
The notion of arbitrage stabilit$ e%tends to the 7multi#le markets7 conte%t of the general
o#timi1ation #roblem:
a%imi1e $ G f9%
<
25552%
n
:
-ubAect to: g
<
9%
<
25552%
n
: G b
<
W
g
m
9%
<
25552%
n
: G b
m
5
! circular transformation %9t: defined in a neighborhood of a critical #oint %90: G %
o
leaves all the
b
A
constant g
i
A
%
i
( G 0 for A G <25552m5 -ince the 7market7 is arbitrage&free2 the circular
transformation $ields no net change in $2 i5e52 f
i
%
i
( G 05 The critical #oint %
o
has arbitrage
stability in this more general conte%t if an$ circular transformation tends to reduce the net change
in $2 i5e52 for an$ circular transformation %9t:2
[ ]
d f %
dt
i i
(
5

< 0
Equation 13. !rbitrage&-tabilit$ Condition
This arbitrage&stabilit$ condition is sim#l$ a reformulation of the usual second&order sufficient
condition for a ma%imum2 so +e have an arbitrage inter#retation for the sufficienc$ conditions5
22

You might also like