Presentation - Power Electronics Arrangements in Distributed Systems
Presentation - Power Electronics Arrangements in Distributed Systems
Distributed generation = DG
Distributed storage = DS
DISTRIBUTED GENERATION: WHAT IS IT?
Wind
Remote
Genset Loads
PV
Fuel Cell
Battery
Customer
Efficiency
Microturbine
Customers
COMMON TRAITS IN DG TECHNOLOGIES
z Mass produced
z Modular
z Small (<20 MW)
z Support system reliability
z Provide economic advantage to end-user
z Provide customer an alternative to standard
generation options
ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE FROM DG SYSTEMS
DC AC
Photovoltaic
generation
DC-to-AC
Conversion
Fuel cells
* kW ~ * MW AC Lines
(usually isolated
Variable-speed from utility lines)
wind generator
Frequency
Conversion
Small
hydrogenerator
Variable Fixed
frequency frequency
POWER ELECTRONICS IN
DC
Batteries
AC Power electronics
Converters/ Automated
Controllers processing/
Superconducting AC/DC
magnet energy manufacturing
Conversion Switching
storage customers
Equipments
Low-quality *0 kW ~ *0 MW High-quality
Large
* kW ~ * MW power power
Capacitors
AC Utility
Lines
FACTS - APPLICATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATIONS
Line Enhanced
Transmission Power Transfer
Reconfiguration
Link and Stability
Better
Protection SVC
FACTS STATCOM
Increased TCSC, SSSC
Devices UPFC, IPFC,
Inertia
FACTS - THE CONCEPT
A transmission system can carry power up to its thermal loading limits. But in
practice the system has the following constraints:
-Transmission stability limits
-Voltage limits
Voltage limits: limits of power transmission where the system voltage can be
kept within permitted deviations from nominal. Voltage is governed by
reactive power (Q). Q in its turn depends of the physical length of the
transmission circuit as well as from the flow of active power. The longer the
line and/or the heavier the flow of active power, the stronger will be the flow of
reactive power, as a consequence of which the voltage will drop, until, at some
critical level, the voltage collapses altogether.
FACTS - THE CONCEPT
The term ”FACTS” covers several power electronics based systems used for
AC power transmission. Given the nature of power electronics equipment,
FACTS solutions will be particularly justifiable in applications requiring one
or more of the following qualities:
-Rapid dynamic response
-Ability for frequent variations in output
-Smoothly adjustable output.
CONTROLLABLE PARAMETERS
E1 / δ1 P&Q E2 / δ2
I
X
Vin
Injected Voltage
P1 = E1 . E2 . sin (δ) / (X - Vin / I) E1
E1 - E2
E2
Injecting Voltage in series with the line mostly change real power
VOLTAGE - PARALLEL CONTROL
E2 / δ2
E1 / δ1 P&Q
I
Q/V
E1
E2
E1 / δ1 P&Q E2 / δ2
I
Vc I Vx
Vx
Vc
Vr Vr
Vxo Vs Vseff = Vs + Vc
Vs
Vseff I Xeff = X - Xc
Changes in X will increase or decrease real power flow for a fixed angle or
change angle for a fixed power flow. Alternatively, the reactive power flow
will change with the change of X. Adjustments on the bus voltage have
little impact on the real power flow.
SERIES AND PARALLEL COMPENSATION
E1 / δ1 P&Q E2 / δ2
I
X
P
Injected Voltage
E1
E1 - E2
E2
Integrated voltage series injection and bus voltage
regulation (unified) will directly increase or decrease real
and reactive power flow.
SERIES AND PARALLEL COMPENSATION
Coupling Coupling
Transformer Transformer
I I
Transformer leakage Transformer leakage
X inductance X inductance
Vo Vo
DC-AC DC-AC
Switching Switching
Converter Converter
Cs Cs
+ +
Vdc Vdc
MULTILEVEL INVERTERS
FACTS DEVICES
Parallel Connected:
Parallel Active Power Filters (Parallel APF)
Static VAR Compensator (SVC)
Static Synchronous Compensator (STATCOM)
Battery Energy Storage System (BESS)
IS
i
ic
C
V I
MAJOR TASKS:
PWM
i*c
CONTROL z Reactive power
compensation
z Source current’s higher
harmonics compensation
z DC element voltage control
PARALLEL APF - STRUCTURE
S1 S3 S5
+
ica L
icb C
icc VSI
C S4 S6 S2
R
-
i fa ica
*
i fb icb
*
i fc Control icc
*
S1 S3 S5
id
ica L
icb
icc L
C
R
CSI S4 S6 S2
i fa ica
*
i fb icb
*
i fc Control
icc
*
MODULAR ACTIVE POWER FILTER - MAPF
iS=iL-iFA iL
∼3φ iFA
LOADS
APF-2 APF-1
APF-K
MAPF – EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
OFF
ON
MAPF – EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
IL
SVC
Thyristor Thyristor
Controlled Switched
Reactor Capacitor
E1 / δ1 I P&Q E2 / δ2
VS VC
VT
MAJOR TASKS:
Vc
z Voltage harmonics
VXL
I F+ I h compensation
XL
v+v
F h
z Stability improvement
VS VT
z Current harmonics blocking
V VS
VC iS
L
is C
V
V*c
Control PW M
SERIES APF - STRUCTURE
Vca
i sa
Va Vsa
S1 S3 S5
+
L C1
C
C S4 S6 S2 C2
R
-
Vfa Vca
*
Vfb Vcb
*
Vfc Control Vcc
*
SSSC
E1 / δ1 P&Q E2 / δ2
I
X
Xeff = X - Vinj/I
TCSC
E1 / δ1 P&Q E2 / δ2
Xeff = X- Xc
COMBINED CONTROLLERS
E1 / δ1 P&Q E2 / δ2
I
X
P1 = E1 (E2 . sin (δ)) / Xeff
Xeff = X - Vinj / I
Vc i
i s
i c H a rm o n ic s
s e n s ib le lo a d
UPQC
V
Vs
Vc iS
i
MAJOR TASKS: iC
Vs
V
•Source current harmonics
L L
compensation C
•Voltage control V
•Voltage harmonics iS
UPQC i
Control
compensation
UPQC - STRUCTURE
Linear load
V ca
i sa i a
Va Vsa i sb i b
i sc Non-
Unbalanced net i c
linear
with harmonicsi
i ca load
i so i o
Cs Rs
i co
S7 S9 S11 + S1 S3 S5
C1 Lf
i fa
S10 S12 S8 + S4 S6 S2
Cf
V fa V fc C2
Rf
V fb
Vca
* i ca
*
G1
L1
i
UPLC =UPFC + UPQC
G2
is Vc
ih L2
V
ic
C Vs
ih
VS
VC
ih iS
ic
L L
C
if
Current i*C V*
C Voltage if
cntrol control
V
is
ih UPLC control
UPLC – VOLTAGE REGULATION
i (q<0)
G1 VL1 VG1
.
V:
L1 i
V
VL1
VG1
V: .
VG1 VL1 V
V i
i (q>0)
i ( q > 0) ⇒ v ↓
i ( q < 0) ⇒ v ↑
UPLC – POWER FLOW CONTROL
Ps G2
is L2
V VL2
Vc VG2
Vs
ps:
V
ps: Vs VG (q>0)
VG (q<0)
VL2 V
Vs s
δ δ
VG2 VG2
ps& qs ps& qs
Vc
V
ps& qs ps& qs
VG (p>0) VG (p<0) Vs
Vs V
V VL2
. VL2 .
is . .
is
qs: qs:
VG2 VG2
IPFC
E1 / δ1 E3 / δ3
E2 / δ2
IPFC – PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION
r r r r
V11 VC 1 VX 1 r V21
I1
INVERTER X1
SYSTEM 1
DC LINK
r r r
V12 VC 2 VX 2 r V22
I2
INVERTER X2
SYSTEM 2
SYSTEM 1
r r r r
V12 VX 2 r V22
V C2 I2
X2
DC LINK
INVERTER
SYSTEM 2
r
V1n
INVERTER
SYSTEM n
n n V min
max 1i max * max
PParallel = ∑ PIPFCi = ∑ 1 − max cos δ i P2i
i =1
i =1
V2i
IPFC – RESULTS OF SIMULATIONS
30
40
case b
50
60
70
case a
80
2 4 6 8 10
Number of Systems
FACTS ATTRIBUTES
Interline Power Flow Controller (IPFC) Reactive power control, voltage control, damping oscillations,
transient and dynamic stability, voltage stability
VOLTAGE POWER QUALITY CONDITIONER
V
X
I I
~
s L
LOAD I
V L V
V S I
X
V V δ
S I
COMPENSATOR
C
V *
IS 2mH IL
~
C +
V PI
C
_
}
δ
0.25m F
25 µ F
-V ~
1Ω V S
Sd
+
400V/d VS 400V/
iv VI div VS VI 10ms/d
10ms/d
IL iv IL iv
100A/ 100A/
div div
10ms/d 10ms/d
IS iv IS iv
100A/d 100A/
iv div
10ms/d 10ms/d
704 VC iv 704 VC iv
V V
696V 10ms/d 696V 10ms/d
iv iv
INTERLINE POWER QUALITY CONDITIONER
r r
V11 r r V21
I11 I21
r
X11 I C1 X21
r
VC1
SYSTEM 1
DC LINK
r SYSTEM 2
r VC2 r
V12 r r r V22
I12 IC2 I22
X12 X22
r r δ 12 < δ 22
V X 11 δ 11 > δ 21 V X 12
r r
r r VC 2
r r VC 1 V X 21 V12 r
V11 IC1 V X 22
r
r IC 2
I 11 r r
V21 I 12 r
δ12 I 22 r
δ 11 r V22
δ 11 δ 21
I 21
δ12
2
δ 21 2
2 δ22
SYSTEM 1 SYSTEM 2
δ 22
2
SERIES VS. PARALLEL
• Increase the system security through raising the transient stability limit,
damping electromechanical oscillations of power systems and machines.
• Reduce reactive power flows, thus allowing the lines to carry more active
power.
CONCLUSIONS
The choice of FACTS device is simple and needs to be made the subject of
detailed system studies, taking all relevant requirements and prerequisites of
the system into consideration, so as to arrive at the optimum technical and
economical solution. In fact, the best solution may often be lying in a
combination of devices.
END